Size Matters
Spacetime geometry in subatomic collisions
 What is the strong force?
Why must we understand it?
 How can we study it?
 What tools do we use?
 Why size matters, &
what it’s told us
Mike Lisa
The Ohio State University
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
1
Forces and structures in Nature
1) Gravity
• one “charge” (mass)
• force decreases with distance
m1
m2
2) Electric (& Magnetic)
• two “charges” (+/-)
• force decreases with distance
+
-
+
+
7 June 2005
Atom
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
2
Atomic nuclei and the “nuclear” force
Nuclei composed of:
quark
• protons (+ electric charge)
• neutrons (no electric charge)
neutron
Does not blow up!?  “nuclear force”
• overcomes electrical repulsion
• determines nuclear reactions
(stellar burning, bombs…)
• arises from fundamental strong force (#3)
• acts on color charge of quarks
proton
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
3
An analogy… and a difference!
to study structure of an atom…
electron
…separate constituents
To understand
the strong force and
theour
phenomenon
ofatoms
confinement:
Imagine
understanding of
or QED if we
nucleus
could not isolate
charged
objects!!
Create and
study
a
system
of
deconfined
colored
quarks
(and gluons)
neutral atom
Confinement: fundamental & crucial (but not understood!) feature of strong force
- colored objects (quarks) have  energy in normal vacuum
quark-antiquark pair
created from vacuum
quark
“white” proton
(confined quarks)
7 June 2005
Strong color 2
field
“white” 0
E=mc
! separation(confined
“white”
proton
Energy
grows
with
!!!
quarks)
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
4
Generating a deconfined state
Present understanding of
Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
• heating
• compression
 deconfined color matter !
Hadronic
Nuclear
Matter
Matter
Quark
Gluon
Plasma
(confined)!
deconfined
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
5
Expectations from Lattice QCD
/T4 ~ # degrees of freedom
confined:
few d.o.f.
deconfined:
many d.o.f.
TC ≈ 173 MeV ≈ 21012 K ≈ 130,000T[Sun’s core]
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
6
The phase diagram of QCD
Temperature
Early universe
quark-gluon plasma
critical point ?
Tc
colour
superconductor
hadron gas
nucleon gas
nuclei
CFL
r0
vacuum
7 June 2005
Neutron stars
baryon density
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
7
The phase diagram of water
Analogous graphs
• superfluids
• superconductors
• metal/insulator
•…
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
8
Bulk Matter
• We must create/compress/heat a bulk (geometrically large) system
– freeze/melt a single H20 molecule?
– fundamental distinction from particle physics
• Only achievable through collisions of the heaviest nuclei (Au, Pb)
at the highest available energy– at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)
QuickTime™ and a
YUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1000’s of
particles produced
in each collision
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
9
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)
PHOBOS
PHENIX
1 km
RHIC
BRAHMS
STAR
v = 0.99995c = 186,000 miles/sec
AGS
TANDEMS
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
10
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)
PHOBOS
PHENIX
RHIC
BRAHMS
STAR
AGS
TANDEMS
STAR ~500 Collaborators
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
11
The STAR Experiment
STAR: Solenoidal Tracker at RHIC
multipurpose detector system for hadronic measurements
Solenoidal
Tracker
At RHIC
• large coverage
(geometrical
acceptance)
• tracking of charged particles in high multiplicity environment
• measure
correlations
of observables
goal: track
“all” charged
hadrons (bags of quarks)
• study ofemitted
hard processes
physics)
in each(jet
collision
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
12
Operation of a Time Projection Chamber
Electric
field
Charged particle flies
thru TPC gas…
“Avalanche” as electrons
approach anode wire...
..generating a cluster
of liberated electrons
Copper pads ~ 1cm2
SCA/ADC
V
DAQ
ADC
Anode wires with +HV
sitting ~5 mm above pads
t
..capacitively inducing
Amplifying and digitizing electronics connected to each
pad
bucket
#
a signal on nearby pads... ..which is amplified, digitized, and recorded for later analysis
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture -
13
One collision seen
by STAR TPC
Momentum determined by track
curvature in magnetic field…
…and by direction relative to beam
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
14
“RHIC is big”
•
•
•
•
big facility
big detectors
big collaborations
“big” collisions
as seen by the Landsat-4 satellite…
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
15
“Big” and “Small” – in meters
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 m
10-18
10-12
10-6
100
106
1012
1018
1024
0.000000000000000001 m
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
16
“Short” and “long” – in seconds
10-24
10-18
10-12
10-6
100
106
1012
1018
1024
as many yoctoseconds (10-24 s ~ 3 fm/c) in a second
as seconds in 10 thousand trillion years
Today’s lecture
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
17
Particle momentum
from tracking…
… how to get particle space-time
information??
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
18
Impact parameter & Reaction plane
Impact parameter vector b :
 beam direction
connects centers of colliding nuclei
b = 0  “central collision”
many particles produced
“peripheral collision”
fewer particles produced
b
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
19
Impact parameter & Reaction plane
Impact parameter vector b :
 beam direction
connects centers of colliding nuclei
Reaction plane:
spanned by beam direction and b
b = 0  “central collision”
many particles produced
“peripheral collision”
fewer particles produced
b
7 June 2005
b
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
20
How do semi-central collisions evolve?
1) Superposition of independent p+p:
momenta pointed at random
relative to reaction plane
b
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
21
How do semi-central collisions evolve?
1) Superposition of independent p+p:
high
density / pressure
at center
momenta pointed at random
relative to reaction plane
2) Evolution as a bulk system
Pressure gradients (larger in-plane)
push bulk “out”  “flow”
“zero” pressure
in surrounding vacuum
more, faster particles
seen in-plane
b
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
22
How do semi-central collisions evolve?
1) Superposition of independent p+p: N
momenta pointed at random
relative to reaction plane
0
/4
/2
0
/4
/2
3/4

3/4

-RP (rad)
2) Evolution as a bulk system
Pressure gradients (larger in-plane)
push bulk “out”  “flow”
more, faster particles
seen in-plane
7 June 2005
N
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
-RP (rad)
23
Azimuthal distributions at RHIC
STAR, PRL90 032301 (2003)
b ≈ 6.5 fm
b ≈ 4 fm
“central” collisions
midcentral
collisions
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
24
Azimuthal distributions at RHIC
STAR, PRL90 032301 (2003)
b ≈ 10 fm
b ≈ 6.5 fm
b ≈ 4 fm
peripheral collisions
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
25
Elliptic flow – collectivity
& sensitivity to early system
“Elliptic flow”
STAR, PRL90 032301 (2003)
• evidence of
collective motion
“v2”
• quantified by v2
• geometrical anisotropy
 momentum anisotropy
• sensitive to early pressure
• evidence for
• early thermalization
• QGP in early stage
Hydrodynamic
calculation of
system evolution
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
26
A more direct handle?
• elliptic flow (v2) and other measurements (not discussed) 
evidence towards QGP at RHIC
– indirect connection to geometry
• Are there more direct handles on the space-time geometry
of collisions?
– yes ! Even at the 10-15 m / 10-23 s scale !
• What can they tell us about the QGP and system evolution?
!
7 June 2005
Warning: some quantum mechanics coming
(feel free to concentrate on “bottom line”)
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
!
27
probing source geometry through interferometry
The Bottom line…
p1
r1
x1
  
  to
  i( r  x )p
if a pion is emitted, itis more
i ( r emit
x )p another
1 { likely
U(x1, p1)e
U(x 2 , p2 )e
 source
T
2
source
  
 
1 m momentum
r(x) pion with very similar
 if the
is small
i ( r  x )p
i ( r  x )p
 U(x 2 , p1)e
5 fm
p2
r2
1
1
1
2
1
2
U(x1, p2 )e

2
2
1
*TT  U1*U1  U*2 U 2  1  eiq( x1  x 2 )
experimentally measuring
this enhanced
Creation probability
r(x,p) =probability:
U*U
quite challenging
P(p1, p 2 )
2
C(p1, p 2 ) 
 1 ~
r (q )
P(p1 )P(p 2 )
C (Qinv)
x2
1
2

Width ~ 1/R
2
1
Measurable!
F.T. of pion source
  
q  p 2  p1
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
0.05
0.10
Qinv (GeV/c)
28
2
}
C2(Qinv)
Correlation functions for different
colliding systems
STAR preliminary
p+p
R ~ 1 fm
d+Au
R ~ 2 fm
Au+Au
R ~ 6 fm
Qinv (GeV/c)
Different colliding systems studied at RHIC
Interferometry probes the smallest scales ever measured !
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
29
More detailed geometry
Relative momentum between pions is a vector q  p1  p 2
 can extract 3D shape information
Rlong – along beam direction
Rout – along “line of sight”
Rside –  “line of sight”
K  p1  p 2
p1
q
Rside
Rout
p2
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
30
Source shape
small RSIDE
• “observe” the source from all angles
relative to the reaction plane
• expect oscillations in radii for
non-round sources
RSIDE
reaction plane
big RSIDE
0
7 June 2005
/4
/2
3/4

-RP (rad)
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
31
Measured final source shape
STAR, PRL93 012301 (2004)
central
collisions
mid-central
collisions
peripheral
collisions
Expected evolution:
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
32
More information
Relative momentum between pions is a vector q  p1  p 2
 can extract 3D shape information
Rlong – along beam direction
Rout – along “line of sight”
Rside –  “line of sight”
K  p1  p 2
p1
Rside
Rout
p2
study as K grows…
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
33
Why do the radii fall
with increasing momentum ??
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
34
Why do the radii fall
with increasing momentum ??
It’s collective flow !!
Direct geometrical/dynamical evidence
for bulk behaviour!!!
Amount of flow consistent with p-space
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
35
Timescales
• Evolution of source shape
– suggests system lifetime is shorter than
otherwise-successful theory predicts
• Is there a more direct handle on timescales?
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
36
Disintegration timescale
Relative momentum between pions is a vector q  p1  p 2
 can extract 3D shape information
Rlong – along beam direction
Rout – along “line of sight”  increases with emission timescale
Rside –  “line of sight”
K  p1  p 2
p1
q
Rside
7 June 2005
Rout
p2
R OUT

R SIDE
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
37
Disintegration timescale - expectation
3D 1-fluid Hydrodynamics
Rischke & Gyulassy, NPA 608, 479 (1996)
with
transition
with
transition
“”
“”
Long-standing favorite signature of QGP:
• increase in , ROUT/RSIDE due to deconfinement  confinement transition
• expected to “turn on” as QGP energy threshold is reached
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
38
Disintegration timescale - observation
• no threshold effect seen
RO (fm)
RS (fm)
• RO/RS ~ 1
8
6
4
8
6
4
RO / RS
1.5
1.25
1.0
increasing collision energy
RHIC
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
39
Disintegration timescale - observation
• no threshold effect seen
• RO/RS ~ 1
• toy model calculations
suggest very short timescales
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
40
Disintegration timescale - observation
• no threshold effect seen
• RO/RS ~ 1
• toy model calculations
suggest very short timescales
• rapid, explosive evolution
• too explosive for “real” models
which explain all other data
An important space-time
“puzzle” at RHIC
- actively under study
Heinz & Kolb, hep-ph/0204061
CYM & LGT
N()
PCM & clust. hadronization
NFD
NFD & hadronic TM
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
41
Summary
• Crucial feature of strong force: confinement
– study bulk system of deconfined quarks
• bulk system is created in heavy ion collisions at RHIC !
• geometric (v2) and other measurements strongly suggest bulk
deconfined matter !
• We can access the smallest size and time scales through
quantum-mechanical mechanism of interferometry
– close investigation of space-time: our understanding of the hot, dense
system evolution is incomplete
• Focusing on holes in understanding-- key to scientific progress
– these are exciting times in our study of the least well-understood force
in Nature … and clearly size matters in this quest !
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
42
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
43
Disintegration timescale - observation
• no threshold effect seen
• RO/RS ~ 1
• toy model calculations
suggest very short timescales
• rapid, explosive evolution
• too explosive for “real” models
which explain all other data
An important space-time
“puzzle” at RHIC
- actively under study
Heinz & Kolb, hep-ph/0204061
CYM & LGT
N()
PCM & clust. hadronization
NFD
NFD & hadronic TM
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
44
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)
PHOBOS
PHENIX
RHIC
PHENIX
~ 500 collaborators
BRAHMS
STAR
AGS
TANDEMS
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
45
An analogy… and a difference!
to study structure of an atom…
electron
…separate constituents
To understand
the strong force and
theour
phenomenon
ofatoms
confinement:
Imagine
understanding of
or QED if we
nucleus
could not isolate
charged
objects!!
Create and
study
a
system
of
deconfined
colored
quarks
(and gluons)
neutral atom
Confinement: fundamental & crucial (but not understood!) feature of strong force
- colored objects (quarks) have  energy in normal vacuum
quark-antiquark pair
created from vacuum
quark
“white” proton
(confined quarks)
7 June 2005
Strong color 2
field
“white” 0
E=mc
! separation(confined
“white”
proton
Energy
grows
with
!!!
quarks)
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
46
An analogy… and a difference!
to study structure of an atom…
electron
…separate constituents
To understand
the strong force and
theour
phenomenon
ofatoms
confinement:
Imagine
understanding of
or QED if we
nucleus
could not isolate
charged
objects!!
Create and
study
a
system
of
deconfined
colored
quarks
(and gluons)
neutral atom
Confinement: fundamental & crucial (but not understood!) feature of strong force
- colored objects (quarks) have  energy in normal vacuum
quark-antiquark pair
created from vacuum
quark
“white” proton
(confined quarks)
7 June 2005
Strong color 2
field
“white” 0
E=mc
! separation(confined
“white”
proton
Energy
grows
with
!!!
quarks)
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
47
Disclaimer
many of the concepts I will present are
“works in very active progress”
an unavoidable consequence of exciting, cutting edge science
7 June 2005
Mike Lisa - Kindergarten Lecture - Zakopane Poland
48