[[1]]
The Camp,
Sunningdale.
March 8/[18]87, 9 p.m.
My dear [Asa] Gray *1
I have your's of 22nd which has only this day arrived & with the joyful news of your having taken your
passages! -- I shall say nothing about it to any one you may depend. We think ourselves
brutally unkind for not going to you, but it was clearly impossible for us & our thoughts are
now full of how to get a trip on the continent with you. This we must do in some shape, but
it is clear that we cannot go far, for we cannot overcome some impedimenta [two and a half
lines crossed out, illeg.]
I should have liked to have
[[2]] got out at least the Euphorbs of Fl[ora]. B[ritish]. I[ndia]. but that will be impossible for I
have enormous[?] deal still to do & it is boiling & dissecting all through. I have just got
through the first revision of Glochidion which, pace G. P. (i.e. G. B.) I must keep distinct
from Phyllanthus; -- with its habit, want of glands, & remarkable ovarian structures it is as
good a genera as any in Euphorbs.
I shall have upwards of 50 species I fear. -- & I am sure that India Botanists will never call
them Phyllantha. They are dreadfully difficult to diagnose, the ♀ fl[owers]. are so minute, &
the styles alter shape so rapidly, that one has to examine a multitude of flowers & proceed
with great caution. The foliage is simply aggravating. I have given
[[3]] off to Mallotus to flounder between that & Macaranga, of each of which I have a host
of species. I have kept Baccaurea for a bonne bouche I fancy they will be some 30 species
with leaves flowers ♀ & ♂ flowers & fruit -- all at cross--purposes & impossible to match
without blunders. The pile of species is quite 5ft. high -- & goes on growing by specimens
thrown out of other genera. The fruits are most remarkable. I suppose that no genera of
Phaenogam is so little known, not even Calamus ! -- not 1/10 of the species were in
Herb[arium] Kew (as named plants) & King's *2 Private collection of them is an enormous
addition to what we had. Enough of Euphorbs -- they are on my brain.
We have today the news of Eichler's *3 death, a great loss. It is hard to see Systematic &
descriptive Botany dying out so rapidly. Dyer *4 it is clear will
[[4]] never do any thing , & I begin to doubt Balfour *5. Oliver *6 won't look at any thing but
the "Icones [Plantarum]", & we must be thankful for that. -- Dear old Baker *7 & C[harles].
B[aron]. Clarke *8 are our last resorts. Lawson of [the] B[ritish] M[useum]. would I think
have done well, but we have sent him to Jamaica. Hemsley *9 is most useful -- but not I
fear up to the mark. Little Brown here would be good, but he goes a leasing[?] after
geological & tellurian speculations is deep in Croll *10 & matters he cannot understand.
Rolfe*11 is mistrusted & hopelessly dull, but a good fellow. -- He begged me to allow him to
do the India orchids! I had to tell him that the India Gov[ernmen]t would expect me to do so
important an order myself. The fact is I shall have to treat them in a very "broad spirit"). -e.g. to describe a dozen or two Dendrob[ium]s & for the rest -- say "D. xxx only differs from
D. xxx in the blue lip" giving its citations &c.
We are getting magnificent collections from interior of China.
Sincerely Y[ou]rs | J. D. Hooker [signature]
ENDNOTES
1. Gray, Asa (1810--1888). American botanist
2. Possibly King, Sir George (1840--1909)
3. Eichler, August Wilhelm (1839--1887). German botanist
4. Thiselton-Dyer, Sir William Turner (1843--1928). Botanist and Director of RBG Kew
(1885--1905).
5. Balfour, Sir Isaac Bayley (1853--1922). Botanist.
6. Oliver, Daniel (1830--1916). Botanist.
7. Possibly Baker, John Gilbert (1834-1920). Botanist.
8. Clarke, Charles Baron (1832--1906). Naturalist.
9. Hemsley, William Botting (1843--1924). Botanist.
10. Croll, James (1821--1890). Geologist.
11 Rolfe, Robert Allen (1855--1921). Botanist .
Please note that work on this transcript is ongoing. Users are advised to study electronic
image(s) of this document where possible.