2011 BSI Steering Committee Report (PDF)

advertisement

2011 Report and

Recommendations

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

2011 Report and Recommendations

Introduction

The Basic Skills Initiative (BSI) at COM concludes the fifth year of its five-year plan in 2011. The purpose of this document is to:

 provide background on the purpose and goals of BSI in California

 summarize the work that the committee, faculty and staff have completed so far

 describe the changing context in the state for basic skills students and identify best practices cited in recent research

 examine our current institutional practices and their results

 recommend steps to improve access and success for basic skills students going forward.

In so doing, we hope to promote “a broad dialogue and critical analysis of research data, especially in light of the changing student demographics” (College of Marin Evaluation Report: A Report Prepared for The

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. December 10, 2010, Recommendation 4, p. 18).

The BSI in California

The statewide BSI was developed in 2006 as part of Strategic Plan Goal Area 2—Student Success and

Readiness through a partnership between the California Community College Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) and the statewide Academic Senate (ASCCC).

BSI is a response to growing concerns about the increasing numbers of students who enter community colleges unprepared for college-level work and their decreasing chances of ever achieving their educational goals. Students who place into one or more basic skills course at entry constitute 80% of community college students, yet they succeed at rates far below other students. BSI is built upon the premise that some practices—institutional, programmatic, instructional, and staff development—are more effective than others in promoting the success of these students. Local colleges’ efforts to improve student retention and success must be tied to these “best practices.”

Assistance from the state is offered to the community colleges through two streams. The first stream is a statewide professional development initiative that includes a constantly-evolving database of best practices; the second stream is through supplemental funding for individual colleges to develop and implement local plans to improve basic skills education. Colleges document their progress through locally-developed action plans documenting use of the funding, and outcomes are tracked using the

Accountability Report for Community Colleges (ARCC), specifically the ARCC Basic Skills report .

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

2

A basic finding of the preliminary research is that the cost of retaining a student to graduation or transfer is estimated as one-fifth the cost of recruiting a new student to replace one who has left college. In addition to the human cost of failing to move basic skills students forward to transfer/graduation, the financial cost to the state is also significant. Further, policymakers in the state are increasingly concerned with building the number of college-educated students to meet projected workforce needs and keep the state competitive.

Besides the financial incentive cited in the BSI documentation, additional incentives for improving the retention and success of our basic skills students are predicted in our state’s future. Recent information on the statewide budget process projects that accounting for apportionment purposes will not be solely determined at census, but will likely include benchmarks throughout the semester, thus creating a fiscal incentive for retention. Nationally, there is also the promise that financial aid accountability will include proof of attendance throughout the semester and proof of students’ progress through the curriculum to achieve their educational goals. Yet, as documented in the Recently Published Research section of this report, the numbers of basic skills students in the state are increasing rapidly and they are much less likely than other students to reach their educational goals. Furthermore, their likelihood of success decreases substantially the longer they spend in remedial courses or sequences.

BSI at College of Marin

In 2007, COM began an in-depth analysis of existing practices and policies affecting students who placed into basic skills courses (see Appendix A for self-assessment and recommendations). Building on the work of the Student Success Council that met at the College for five years, more than sixty faculty, staff and managers participated in this self-assessment that led to the following overarching 5-year goal: a.

To create a comprehensive support center, including a College Success Course, to better serve students who need assistance with Basic Skills/ESL, and b.

To create a program of professional development in culturally responsive teaching and student support services.

BSI has been funded at each college based on the number of student enrollments in math and English below the transfer level; at COM this allocation has been approximately $90,000 per year. Each college is also required to submit a college-wide assessment of current practices, and a plan, updated annually, for using BSI funds to improve student persistence and success in basic skills courses.

In 2008-2009, COM’s plan was expanded to include the formation of a Basic Skills Initiative Steering

Committee (BSISC) to guide the work. The BSISC includes representatives from Math, English, ESL,

Counseling, the Tutoring and Learning Center, EOPS, and the Office of Institutional Planning and

Research. The BSISC meets regularly throughout the semester and is responsible for developing the annual Action and Expenditure plans, reviewing faculty and staff proposals, setting and implementing a research agenda, reporting BSI information back to respective departments, and participating in campus-wide BSI events. The mission of the BSISC is to advocate for basic skills students at the College, assess our institutional practices related to BSI on an ongoing basis, and monitor progress towards

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

3

completion of our five-year Action Plan. As part of our approach to achieve our goals, funded projects have included the following:

Institutional Practices

Completing program review for basic skills courses (achieved in fall 2008)

Revival of the Road to Success, a faculty and staff initiative involving all disciplines in orientation, welcoming, and presentation of support services and department offerings at the start of each fall semester

Outreach to prospective students in Marin City

Saturday services during the weekend before and after classes start to address the needs of late enrollees

Two years of a full-time counselor funded half through BSI funds and half through Puente.

(Luz Moreno begins her second year in this position in August 2011.)

Programmatic Practices

Support for Math faculty to develop Math 85, a new course in the sequence to address the low success rate in Math 95

Math Lab services geared to basic skills students

Professional Math tutors embedded in a Math 95 class (pilot)

English course sequence alignment project

Mentoring and academic support for student athletes

Purchase of ten new computers for the Writing Lab

Hiring a basic skills liaison for the Tutoring and Learning Center

Funding grant-ineligible services as part of the successful Vocational noncredit ESL project funded by Marin Community Foundation (MCF)

Instructional Practices

A learning community pairing English 92 with Counseling 125

Continuation of the successful College Prep Academy pairing courses in the basic skills

English sequence with a transfer-level course

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

4

Staff Development

Faculty and staff development activities including participation in statewide and regional training and a joint presentation with the Modern Languages Department on the learning strengths of culturally diverse students

Funding the 21st Century Teaching Academy, an initiative on culturally sensitive teaching involving 15 COM faculty and staff, the first session of which was our fall 2010 convocation

As we approach the five-year mark, we find that although our major goal of creating a welcoming space on campus to meet the multiple needs of basic skills students is not near completion, the potential for this to happen seems much greater than it did in 2007. We now have a basic skills counselor, enhanced services for basic skills students in some areas, and, with the potential for redesigning LC 120, the potential for basic skills English faculty and staff to work across departmental lines. Student success and progress rates in the English and Math course sequences seem to have improved somewhat based on

ARCC data, although we still have room for improvement. WASC noted (page 32) that only eight fulltime faculty members participated in the21st Century Teaching Academy which BSI funded in an effort to improve understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity at COM. We believe that such efforts must be ongoing and we will be seeking suggestions and information about how we can work together to continuously improve the college environment for basic skills students.

Recently Published Research

Recent studies shed light on successful strategies for promoting success and retention for basic skills students. The October 2010 study Divided We Fail: Improving Completion and Closing Racial Gaps in

California’s Community College (C. Moore and N. Shulock, October 2010 Institute for Higher Education

Leadership and Policy) establishes the importance of basic skills students’ completing at least 20 credits during their first year in college, citing the achievement gap between white and minority students. Here is a summary of the findings:

Too few basic skills students reach their AA/AS/Certificate goals: Too many students fail to complete their educational plans; after 6 years, only 30% of basic skills students have completed a certificate or a degree. Of these, Latinos complete certificates/degrees at a rate 47% lower than other groups.

Transfer: Transfer success is low for basic skills students in general; about 23% of degree seekers transferred to a university; for Latino students only 14% transferred. Transfer does not mean completing two years of study (as we commonly assume); especially for black students the process takes much longer. The state Master Plan targets a far greater percentage of transfer students to meet state employment projections, but the majority of basic skills students do not meet those targets.

Success Models: Statewide, basic skills completion rates and levels of racial/ethnic disparity in achievement (the achievement gap) vary – however, some colleges find

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

5

ways to be more effective at helping students of all backgrounds make progress. The report identifies some patterns of student enrollment that provide clues for improvement. Students who followed certain enrollment patterns did much better: 59% who earned at least 20 credits in their first year completed a certificate, degree, or transfer within six years. However, few basic skills students follow the successful patterns, with large racial/ethnic gaps: only 25% of degree seekers who placed into basic skills courses earned at least 20 credits in the first year; 29% passed at least one college-level math course within two years; 36% passed at least one college-level

English course within two years.

Another paper, Something’s Got to Give: California can’t improve college completions without rethinking

developmental education at its community colleges (EdSource Report, October 2010), documents not only the increasing number of California Community College students who require basic skills instruction, but also the inverse relationship between the length of time spent completing the sequences and the likelihood that they will ever be completed. Here is a summary:

A large portion of community college students enter unprepared for college-level academic studies; many students enroll in developmental education programs. (At

COM, about 80% of our entering students test into at least one course below the college level; this level tracks with statewide trends.)

The greater the number of courses that must be completed in order for a student who tests into basic skills math and English courses to get to transfer level, the higher the non-completion rate. Therefore, community colleges need to accelerate the pace at which students get through these programs – so there is a significant increase in the numbers who successfully complete the (degree/certificate) programs.

California community colleges have responded to the need for remedial courses with vastly different approaches and programs’ and with various degrees of success.

Improvements to programs include: a) reducing the number of students who need development education, b) creating conditions that will help students be more successful in the courses they attempt, and c) compressing the time it takes students to get through remedial sequences.

One key conclusion – “students’ outcomes depended heavily on where they started in the remedial sequences.” The higher their placement, the more likely they were to complete.

Insight into the weakness of the link between high school advising and the requirements of community colleges, which leads to poor planning for those students who need basic skills instruction, is referenced in Misplaced from the Start, David Moltz, October 2010 ( http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/10/11/california

).

Here is a summary of the findings:

High school seniors do not fully understand that community college placement exams can significantly affect the number of math and English courses they need to take by determining whether they enroll in credit-bearing or development/remedial classes

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

6

(and how far ‘behind’ they are in the sequence). These students erroneously believe that if they graduate from high school that they are prepared to start credit-bearing college classes. While they are still in high school, students should be advised of the importance of these placement tests, and they should be encouraged to review and study for them. Specifically, high school students do not know how prepared they are to begin credit-bearing classes in a community college; students should be tested when they are juniors in high school and informed of their level and counseled on what academic classes to take to enter college better prepared.

Finally, the Legislative Analyst Policy Brief issued on January 20, 2011 a report entitled The 2011-2012

Budget: Prioritizing Course Enrollment at the Community College, Mac Taylor, which shows how individual colleges can design early registration policies to prioritize rapid success for their basic skills students:

California’s community colleges (CCCs) are legally “open access”; however, recent reductions in course offerings due to budget cuts and increasing demand for re-entry career courses by displaced adult workers have limited access for many students. The competition for a shrinking number of courses amounts to de facto “rationing” of enrollments. Currently, the legislature allows CCCs broad discretion in determining registration priorities. Virtually all 76 of the CCCs currently prioritize registration for military\veteran, DSPS, and EOPS students. Most CCCs also prioritize continuing students, regardless of academic goals or progress, but not first-time students. This brief argues that CCCs should use priority enrollment to direct their resources to those students who meet the highest priorities under the state’s Master Plan: that is, students who enroll to (1) earn credits for transfer to a four-year college, (2) obtain an associate’s degree or certificate, or (3) gain basic job or language skills.

For example, the highest priority would be given to continuing students who are making satisfactory academic progress as defined by federal financial aid and who are fully matriculated, i.e., who have completed assessment, orientation, counseling, and an educational plan. Second priority would go to new students, especially recent high school graduates who have completed these same elements of matriculation. Nonmatriculated students, students who declare their intent as personal enrichment, and students who are not making satisfactory progress would receive lower priority for registration.

To further these goals, the brief recommends that the Legislature eliminate taxpayer subsidy of CCC courses in two ways: (1) courses taken by students who have more than one hundred units (forty units more than typically required for a degree or transfer) and

(2) any repetition of the same or similar “activity course” such as physical education and the visual and performing arts. These could be offered through community education.

Exceptions would be made for intercollegiate sports, adaptive PE, and courses for PE or fine arts majors. The recommendation does permit individual CCCs flexibility to determine students’ priority enrollment ranking based on “extraordinary circumstances” such as lack of availability of counselors.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

7

Basic Skills Students at COM

The chart below shows the math and English sequences at COM in descending order with the percentages of our students who placed at each level between June 16, 2009 and February 15, 2011.

Any course below the transfer level is eligible for BSI funding to create sustainable support to student success.

COM Entering Student Placement Levels

Math English

104/110/115/123 transfer level (CSU) (11.3%)

103 (35.5%)

101 (17.9%)

150 transfer level (CSU and

UC) (25.9%)

120 (26.5%)

98 (17.4%)

95 (17.6%) 92 (16.5%)

85 (17.7%) 62 (7.0%)

*5.1% are recommended to take the ESL placement test

Placement: When BSI first began our self-assessment in 2007, 16% of entering COM students placed into transfer-level math compared to 9% at community colleges statewide, and 4% of our students placed into transfer-level English compared to 27% statewide.

1 At that time we were using an outdated test that is no longer accepted by the Chancellor’s Office. In fall 2008 the college piloted Accuplacer, a widely-used placement test in both math and English, and our placement rates changed substantially.

Between 2009 and 2011, 11.3% of our entering students placed into a transfer-level math course and

26% placed into a transfer-level English course: in both cases closer to the statewide averages. It is not known how many students placed into both pre-transfer math and pre-transfer English.

Student Success: A 5-year cohort study conducted in 2006 suggested that students who tested into the lowest levels of math and English when they entered COM did not progress through the sequence at a satisfactory rate: only 21% of the students who completed Math 95 as their first course in the sequence in fall 2001 had registered in Math 101 (the subsequent course in the required math sequence) by fall

2006. In fall 2010, the math department began offering a new course at the start of the sequence, Math

85, developed through BSI funds. In its first semester, Math 85 had a student success rate of 63%. It remains to be seen whether this course will positively affect the long-term success and completion rate

1 COM Data from Office of Organizational Development & Planning; statewide data from

Environmental Scan: A Summary of Key Issues Facing California Community Colleges

Pertinent to the Strategic Planning Process, Research and Planning Group for California

Community Colleges, 2005, p. 6

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee 01 June 2011

College of Marin

8

for our basic skills students in the math sequence because we know from national and statewide data that lengthening the sequences tends to decrease completion rates.

For those who entered the English sequence in English 92 in fall 2006, 47% had registered in the subsequent course, English 98, by fall 2006; however, only 12% of those who took English 92 as their first course in the sequence succeeded in passing the transfer-level course in the sequence, English 150.

We do not know enough about our students’ intentions when they begin the required course sequences in math and English to draw firm conclusions from these data. The registration form we use asks students for their intention, but offers choices “A through O” (see Appendix B) in a way that could be confusing to a new student. This information is not updated after the point of registration. As a result, many faculty and staff believe that a very small percentage of our students intend to transfer. But recent data for later cohorts suggest differently: nearly every student who passes a course in our writing sequence registers in the subsequent level. We need to learn more about why this is so.

A Changing Student Demographic: In the College’s latest Master Plan 2009-2019, it is projected that the

Hispanic student population is the only ethnic population that is anticipated to grow. This is partially related to a shift in population of the county in coming years. While in general the population of the county is projected to remain stable, the exception will be with the Hispanic population. This student demographic is expected to grow dramatically. According to the Department of Finance for the state of

California (2007), between the years 2000 and 2020 the projected increase in the Hispanic population in

Marin County will be 159%.

The Latino student population in the year 2010 assessed in larger numbers than any other ethnic group into basic skills English and Math. Only 14% assessed into college level English compared to 25% of the total student population. Only 5% assessed into college level Math compared to 11% of the total student population. The transfer rate in this year for the Latino population was also relatively low with only 8 Latino students out of a total of 97 transferring to the University of California system. Only 10

Latino students out of a total of 83 transferred to the California State University system.

BSISC Recommendations

Based on our four years of work, the BSI Steering Committee makes the following recommendations for consideration in going forward. The recommendations fall under two major goals:

A) Improve support services to enable basic skills students to navigate successfully through COM today

B) Work toward a cultural shift for the institution to make it easier for basic skills students to navigate successfully through COM in the future

A.

Improve Student Support Services

1.

Make student success in the English and math sequences a top institutional priority

Studies show that successful completion of the first year in the required math and English

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

9

sequences, based on placement testing, is a strong predictor of student persistence and success. BSI’s initial institutional assessment showed that we are not doing as well as our

ARCC cohort in this area. This year’s ARCC data show us as doing better than our cohort but student success rates in most courses below transfer level were still under 50% in spring

2010. COM’s rates of students’ first-year completion—basic skills course completion and success—should be studied and targeted for improvement on an ongoing basis. Students and faculty should be regularly surveyed to determine what supports are needed and these should be provided.

2.

Increase meaningful outreach to high school students and faculty COM’s Matriculation

Advisory Group has recommended that we implement the Early Assessment Program (EAP), a project that would engage students in testing for college placement in English and math during their junior year in high school. Those students who place below the college level would then have more than a year to bring their skills up to speed and avoid basic skills requirements in college. The 2003 Stanford Bridge Project Study found that although 88% of the high school students they studied nationally expected to go to college, only 11% of these students knew the academic requirements of the college of their aspirations. In the state of

California, the percentage was only 1%--the lowest in the nation.

2 One of the key misconceptions noted in the study was that community colleges have no academic standards.

3.

Emphasize and provide easy access to full matriculation for our basic skills students COM should improve access to all of the elements of matriculation for continuing and first-time students whose academic goals are transfer, degree or certificate. These students should be made aware of the importance of assessment, enrollment, orientation, counseling and educational planning from their first contact with the College and in every class they take.

Yet cuts in matriculation funds have reduced services in these areas, and students hard hit by the economy cannot find the time to complete these essential steps if they do not realize their importance. At the very least, an extended orientation for basic skills students could be offered in their English classes and BSI has funded a faculty project to create a common vocabulary and outcomes for this work.

4.

Strengthen practices to make students aware of the services available to enhance their

success: Continue and enhance Road to Success, Saturday Services, and other interdepartmental efforts to improve student awareness of the resources available at COM. An upcoming BSI project will create a central web directory for all of the resources that COM offers to our basic skills students; in order to make this guide meaningful, every area of the

2 Venezia, A., Kirst, M. K., & Antonio, A. L. Betraying the College Dream: How Disconnected

K–12 and Postsecondary Education Systems Undermine Student Aspirations. Final policy report from Stanford University’s Bridge Project, Stanford, CA: The Stanford Institute for

Higher Education Research. 2003. www.stanford.edu/group/bridgeproject/

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee 01 June 2011

College of Marin

10

college will need to contribute and update relevant information. Academic support services, student services, administrators and academic departments should develop systematic ways to communicate regularly and collaborate more seamlessly to meet our students’ needs.

B.

Improve the institutional climate for basic skills students

1.

Offer sufficient sections of basic skills courses to meet the demand Studies of basic skills student success conducted over the past decade have emphasized the importance of students’ completing the math and English courses into which they initially place during their first semester in college and then moving rapidly through the requirements. Yet in fall

2010, COM had wait-listed more than twice as many students in the initial level, Math 85, than students registered (see Appendix C). For these students, the path to transfer-level math is a long one: they must successfully complete four levels (Math 85, Math 95, Math

101, and Math 103) before they can register for a transfer-level Math course. For students who are already weak in math, this long road can be discouraging. By not providing them the opportunity to start their path to math transfer, we are making it even longer.

2.

Implement priority enrollment for COM students, not out-of-county students EOPS, DSPS, veterans and student athletes already receive priority registration and, with so many colleges statewide limiting enrollments, we should continue the policy implemented in fall

2010 of giving at least a week of priority registration to students who are already enrolled at

COM. If research capability permits, we also recommend giving an even greater priority to

COM students who were enrolled in the prior semester in a course in the required math or

English sequences below college level and who succeeded in those courses. We should set a lower priority courses for students from other colleges to transfer back to their home institutions.

3.

Embark on a serious study of our basic skills students’ aspirations Currently our students’ reasons for enrolling in college are logged only once, at entry. However, research suggests that community college students often make up their minds to transfer because of some positive experiences they have while attending their first year of classes. We need to update students’ evolving sense of what is possible for them so that we can design our programs to help them achieve those aspirations. The Matriculation Revitalization group is recommending an annual update of students’ goals and BSISC strongly supports that recommendation.

4.

Update and implement the Student Equity Plan (SEP) and the recommendations of the

Task Force on Campus Climate WASC has recommended that the goals of the SEP and Task

Force on Campus Climate be implemented (page 31). BSISC plans to address some of these goals in the coming year. Attached is a chart of activities that BSI has funded to help achieve the goals set forth in the SEP (Appendix D). We plan to continue to support this important

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

11

work especially in improving success for our ethnically diverse basic skills students and in helping to build understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity at our college .

5.

Embark on a college-wide effort to research and collaborate on Latino student trends and

issues Since Latino students are enrolling in large numbers at our college, and in even larger numbers in our basic skills courses, it is important to seek collaboration with community agencies external to the college—to find out where and why this trend is occurring, and to find a proactive approach in preparing this population for college ready English and Math in greater numbers. Also, research should be done internally with student input as to Latino students’ low transfer rate and low degree attainment rates.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

12

Respectfully submitted by

The Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee Spring 2011

Susan Andrien

Jim Arnold

Win Cottle

Melody Creel

Cheo Massion

Luz Moreno

Jason Murphy

Meg Pasquel

Becky Reetz

Rose Thompson

Director of Learning Resources (co-chair)

Dean of Math and Science

English faculty

Research (advisory)

ESL faculty (co-chair)

Puente/BSI Counselor

Math Lab Staff

College Skills faculty/staff

Interim EOPS Director/Tutoring

EOPS Counselor

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

13

Appendix A and Appendix A-2

R ESULTS OF S ELF -A SSESSMENT D ISSEMINATED F EBRUARY 21, 2008

I NSTITUTIONAL P RACTICES

Developmental courses in English and math should have their enrollment caps reduced to 25.

F ACULTY D EVELOPMENT /C OMMUNICATION

 Professional development in culturally responsive teaching is not readily available or offered on campus. Professional development in this area has not been offered in a while and would be useful now.

College should offer professional development in culturally responsive teaching.

 ESL teachers teach at different times of the day and week and it is difficult for them to meet to discuss issues of mutual concern or to develop common assessment tools. Develop methods or tools to facilitate faculty discussion (such as online discussion forums). Create simple but systematic tools for faculty to assess the overall progress of students in the program. Give faculty reassigned time to study and report about student success regularly. Consider ½ day staff development time perhaps once a month to bring ESL faculty together, particularly because all noncredit ESL is taught by part-time faculty.

 Faculty in English Skills and English would like professional development in current reading pedagogy, in techniques and methods proven to be effective with developmental students .

The college needs to hire a full-time reading specialist to lead this initiative.

 Provide support for interested faculty who teach developmental and transfer-level English to explore ways to help students develop digital literacy skills and portfolio self-assessment.

 English Skills: While problem-solving and critical thinking skills are an essential part of the developmental courses, the approaches and SLOs are not consistent from class to class. Faculty in

English Skills should continue to meet to discuss and refine critical thinking and behavioral

SLO’s to make improvements. A better way of measuring behavioral SLO’s may need to be developed and implemented. Faculty have few formal opportunities for professional development on the new developments in the field beyond faculty meetings and their own initiative.

 English 98 and English 120 instructors should also begin meeting to discuss and implement their critical thinking SLO’s and discuss strategies that help students become more active learners.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

14

 Since developmental English courses are taught in two departments (English skills and English), they are not as integrated as they could be. Formal discussions of alignments, exit skills, etc. have not taken place for several years between members of the two departments. Create a “joint commission” of developmental English instructors to articulate the sequence from 62 to 120, to create joint pre and post-tests and more unified curriculum. Establish “level meetings” for

English 98 and 120 to develop a set of norms for the exit criteria of these courses that are linked to SLOs and supported with examples of students’ work, and that are linked clearly with English 92 and English 150.

 Develop formal mechanisms for content discipline faculty and developmental English faculty to align their expectations and skills so that developmental students are fully prepared for content courses.

 Some of the “best practices” in the field indicate the importance of Learning Communities, which we have just begun exploring in English Skills with the “Transfer Prep Academy.” We would like to expand on this approach, by expanding the Transfer Prep Academy. This will require release time for teachers.

 Create institution-supported opportunities for teachers to share assignments, lesson plans, and assessment measures. As part of the College Skills Department (or the “College Success

Initiative”), assign an academic counselor and a personal/crisis counselor with training and interest in developmental education to work with developmental students.

 Provide ongoing and formal opportunities for English skills, English and ESL faculty to discuss approaches to tutoring, including tutoring for ESL and “generation 1.5” students who use both English and ESL labs and provide for developing and coordinating of lab resources.

 Create a committee of workforce, English skills, math faculty and counselors to create a network of transitional classes and supports, including collaborative/linked courses, community partnerships with local training programs, and new courses that could carry students “horizontally” in to workforce classes (parallel in rigor to the traditional transfertrack English courses).

H IRING N EEDS

Mathematics faculty members are not trained to identify learning problems. We are aware and appreciate the help that is available at DSPS from assistants who are dedicated to the students’ mathematical needs. It might also be helpful to have a trained, certificated mathematics resource teacher who specializes in the special needs of students and who is an expert in the learning differences that so often occur.

English skills needs a full-time faculty member who is trained as a reading specialist.

Noncredit ESL needs full-time faculty. Currently there are no full-time faculty in the noncredit ESL department, although they serve approximately 2,000 students per semester.

The college appears to be in a good position in percentage of full-time faculty teaching developmental courses except at the level of English 92 (which is skewed because one of the two full time

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

15

instructors is not available to teach English 92, and is instead located in English 62 and the

English lab). Using Fall 2007 for an example, the proportion of full time/part time instructors teaching sections at each level of the basic skills composition sequence breaks down as follows:

English 62

FT

1

PT

0

%FT

100%

English 92

English 98

English 120

TOTAL

2

5

7

15

3

2

3

8

40%

71%

70%

65%

65% is close to the ratio of FT/PT across the entire English program (65/35 in English Skills; 77/23 in

English).

S TUDENT D EVELOPMENT

Counseling/Orientation/Matriculation

Some students report they were encouraged to move ahead or skimp on prerequisites when they will almost certainly fail because they are not adequately prepared to do work which builds on the skills that were expected to be acquired beforehand. We should enforce placement testing requirement consistently.

Students are only required to take Math and English placement tests if test is prerequisite. Need

Counseling’s input. There may be a disconnect between a Counselor’s direction to test and follow up to be sure that student has tested.

Students are enrolling in classes without guidance of a Counselor due to inconsistent enforcement of matriculation.

We need counseling or at least advising for all incoming students.

Too much emphasis in Counseling is on the transfer-ready students. The ratio of students to

Counselor bears looking into.

The most recent ratio would be one Counselor to 1,000+ noncredit students.

Only in CalWorks or EOPS does monitorin g of basic skills students’ outcomes take place consistently. An

“early alert” system should ideally begin at assessment and flag that student for monitoring by

Counseling.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

16

There is insufficient data available to both Testing and Counseling. The college’s database system is a dinosaur. We are currently launching Banner, a cutting edge information system, which should help.

The noncredit ESL program needs program advisors/professional experts who know the ESL program and are ESL-credentialed.

These individuals can best serve the noncredit student ESL needs because at the lower levels. ESL classes are the only classes that they can take.

There is a 40 to 1 ratio of noncredit ESL students to staff at the noncredit test/orientation. Best practice is

20 to 1. This is a funding issue. Very recently, the budget has been increased with fixing this problem in mind. A lot of our Basic Skills students at COM are ESL students. COM has very few bilingual staff. In

Counseling, there has been only one Spanish-speaking counselor. Until recently, only one counselor would see ESL students, even advanced ESL students. We need bilingual counselors or advisors who understand the needs of basic skills students (almost all of our students).

Conduct workshops with counselors so they all fully understand the English developmental sequence, the skills and reading/writing levels for each course, and how it builds on each step.

Tutoring

Tutors are recommended by instructors from their mathematics classes, so they should be competent in the subject matter. The tutors in the Mathlab take a tutor training course, Math 199. Although tutors in the Tutoring Center are required to take a general tutor-training course, they are not required to take Math

199. Math 199 should be a requirement for tutors who work in all math tutoring programs.

To ensure consistency, the tutor training course taught through the tutoring center should be taken by all peer tutors who tutor at COM (or through COM). Tutors should also be supervised centrally.

Develop a formal faculty referral system for students who need tutoring in non-required English courses and other content area courses.

Institute a practice of assigning specific tutors to specific students who need the most support, linked to that stud ents’ English teacher (as a sort of “team” approach), so that ongoing working relationships can develop that focus on the core skills the student needs to improve.

Separate learning assistance centers for ESL, Basic Skills English, English, and Math. The Tutoring Center is not permitted to tutor students in English or Writing courses. Consolidate these services whenever possible.

Tutoring Center provides some course-related learning assistance but only group tutoring is available unless students belong to EOPS. The writing center offers some course-related learning assistance but because student learning outcomes for writing courses are not clearly defined, the value is limited. There are separate centers for ESL, Basic Skills English, English, and Math. Tutoring Center is not permitted to

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

17

tutor students in English or Writing courses. We need clear systems for maximizing tutoring resources.

The Tutoring Center currently serves a large population of Basic Skills students, but provides the bulk of support t in subjects not defined as Basic Skills., since Basic Skills students usually also take some transfer-level courses. Specialized student success workshops led by peer tutors, model students or pt faculty could support student success in these courses.

Financial Aid

Students not meeting normal residency requirement receive assistance. In fund raising in Marin County for AB 504 students, many reflect an attitude of not wanting to support this type of student. We need to develop several fund raising strategies so potential donors can support those values they endorse.

The development of a scholarship office should be considered as there are scholarships available for AB540 along with other scholarships that could benefit all students.

Placement/Assessment: A new assessment tool, Accuplacer, is about to be launched any day now.

Hopefully, with better placement the students will be in a more appropriate class and will be better prepared to succeed.

C URRICULUM /A LIGNMENT

Math

West Valley College has initi ated math intensive preparation “camps” for students during the week before the official start of the semester. These are very intense non-credit programs, meeting for 5 days, 5-6 hours/day, for students where they use ALEKS to identify and remediate the topics that they are weak in.

If we were able to do this at CoM students would be better prepared at the beginning of the semester or, alternately, they may realize that they are placed in a course that is too difficult for them. These camps could be recommended for all students who use the placement test and place below a certain level. Additionally, they could be recommended for students who have passed the prerequisite course, but who have earned a grade less than an A. These camps would have to be funded. Additionally, funding might be needed to pay for grants for ALEKS for some of the students.

A 10 hour/week section of Introductory Algebra course is being developed by one of our professors. This is modelled after a highly successful program at De Anza College. He is asking for funds from an I,R, & D grant. If this does not materialize, BSI it is hoped might provide funding.

The mathematics department feels that there are many students for whom placement in our lowest level course, Math 95, is too advanced. Therefore, a proposal needs to be made to institute a more basic

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

18

course (probably non-credit) which will start at the very beginning with the concept of number and basic arithmetic facts.

A possible “stretch” version of Math 95 which the students would take over the course of 2 semesters instead of just one semester (much like Math 101AB and Math 103AB.)

English

Create alternative methods for students to gain the requisite skills, via modular courses, linked courses, courses specific to workforce programs, etc.

Have a process that shows the relationship of students’ reading and vocabulary levels to the textbooks and expectation of transfer-level courses, so that students can understand more fully what’s expected at that level. This would require release time for faculty to examine textbooks’ readability level and/or to use the Accuplacer reading levels to develop tools to show students expected levels as compared to their current skill levels

Institute a “Reading across the Curriculum” series that targets specific textbooks used on campus.

As part of the effort to develop uniformity at all levels of developmental English, stipends and/or release time is needed to form instructional teams to formally share syllabuses, instructional methods, exit criteria, etc. (see D7) Such teams should also be formed between key transfer and vocational content faculty and developmental faculty, to ensure that the developmental courses are providing the skills that content faculty expect students to have

SLO’s are not yet fully implemented in English 98 and 120 in terms of having faculty use a shared rubric or other form of final assessment, and faculty do not meet by level for these courses.

The course outlines for all the developmental English classes have not been examined through any formal disciplinary discussion to ensure that they provide a streamlined sequence.

English Skills faculty want to re-evaluate the curriculum of the one-unit lab courses, to rewrite curriculum in courses with low retention, research computerized skills assistance at all levels, and re-evaluate the process and methods of the open-entry, open-exit labs. The one-unit lab courses need to improve their retention rates and possibly be offered in other modes (on line, etc.)

ESL : Developing “conversation circles” would enhance pronunciation, build vocabulary and would increase the ability of ESL students to use correct stress and intonation patterns in everyday conversation.

Content Courses

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

19

Create modular companion courses for targeted transfer classes that are commonly taken by

Basic Skills students.

A CADEMIC S UPPORT P RACTICES AND P ROCEDURES

Consider putting the current English Skills and Writing Center labs in the same physical space. does not exist, and so the amount of help a student gets often relies entirely on the initiative and knowledge of an individual faculty member. Implement a coordinated, integrated system of linking services to instruction

English faculty should work with the Tutoring program to train peer tutors, buddy tutors, and mutual help study groups for developmental students to supplement existing support.

Students who are not required to use either of these labs are often informally referred by their teachers or counselors. A formal referral system does not exist for students not in certain developmental English courses, and students work with whichever tutors are available. A formal referral system should be implemented.

Technology

Current computer software used for English skills courses needs to be updated and made ADAcompliant.

Need to provide adequate funding to permit students sufficient access to technological resources and support, as needed to create “innovative learning environment” as proposed in college mission statement.

Place ESL programs on all computers in labs.

-There is considerable enthusiasm in the Mathematics Department to use online homework resources such as MyMathLab and incorporate this use in some lecture sections to develop hybrid types of sections for developmental math students. One of our instructors did a pilot and found that some of the students didn’t have computers and this made it difficult for them to use the program unless they were able to stay on campus. The students who don’t have computers are generally the most financially challenged and have work schedules that make it most difficult for them to stay on campus. Perhaps a computer loan system could be developed with some of the BSI funds to help these students.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

20

Meeting of the Basic Skills Initiative

Friday, February 22, 2008 10:00 AM-12:00 PM

SS A & B

The BSI had another action-packed meeting marked by the sharing of ideas for improving the ways in which we welcome, instruct, and support students who are taking one or more courses below college level. The enthusiastic participants included Sara Mackinnon, Faye Mueller-Delia, Nick Chang, Patricia

Torres, Chris Schultz, Gwynne Petersen, Arnulfo Cedillo, Bruce Furuya, Susan Andrien, Vaughan Ariano,

Windee Cottle, Gaylene Urquhart, Jim Arnold, Janice Austin, Melody Creel, Becky Reetz, Candice

Garretson, Roz Hartman, Diana Verdugo, and John Jacob. Here are the high points:

1) A draft of the compiled recommendations from the four teams was distributed. Since many of the recommendations need to be reviewed by separate academic departments before we can go forward, we decided to focus our discussion on two major areas: a) the CSI: Marin idea of a College Success Initiative where academic and student services support would be available for students in one central location, and b) professional development in culturally responsive teaching and student

2) The CSI idea evolved from the recommendation in the recent Basic Skills English program review, written by Carol Adair, that recommended creation of a comprehensive and unified organizational structure and centralized space academic support, and student services for Basic

Skills students. This initiative would provide the kind of personal, consistent outreach and support that is currently offered through EOPS. At CSI students would find an integrated approach to providing all levels of support is needed (counseling, advising, referrals, cohortbuilding, etc.). It would include:

Create a “College Skills department” for all of College of Marin’s developmental, pretransfer programs; include disability testing, personal and academic counseling, academic advising, tutoring and job skills as an integral part of this department’s curricular offerings. Ideally, this department should be housed in a unified space or

“home” for basic skills students on campus, where students can access all the services they need to use in one location. In a comprehensive support program model, developmental English students should find

Links with COM’s workforce courses, county/local union training programs, job placement, etc.

Academic advising, Academic and personal/crisis counseling provided by professional with expertise in working with developmental students and their issues.

Links to on and off campus resources, such as child care, transportation, tutors,

Social activities and clearly designated, institutionalized welcoming/orientation

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

21

Electronic bulletin board announcing campus events.

A unified two-semester program that links students with the college services and resources through course offerings would be excellent. Key to success would be capable and supportive instructors, thereby creating the emotional/academic motivation for the attainment of developmental educational goals for these students.

A thorough communication of the philosophic, academic foundation of the program would need to be conveyed to all faculty, staff and administration, including the board, to garner program support. Identification of appropriate participants--students--would need to be formalized through early testing and additional resources. Consistent evaluation, assessments and review will need to be maintained, including academic tracking on student success to determine program effectiveness. Regular meetings will need to be structured into program for members.

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

22

Appendix B

College of Marin

Credit Application for Admissions – Question 15: Students are asked to state their Educational Goal at the time of admissions

15. Educational Goal (Please enter the appropriate letter here)

A. Obtain an associate degree and transfer to a 4-year institution

B. Transfer to a 4-year institution without an associate degree

C. Obtain a 2-year associate degree without transfer

D. Obtain a 2-year vocational degree without transfer

E. Earn a vocational certificate without transfer

F. Discover/Formulate career interests, plans, goals

G. Prepare for a new career (acquire job skills)

H. Advance in current job/career (update job skills)

I. Maintain certificate or license

J. Educational development

K. Improve basic skills

L. Complete credits for high school diploma or GED

M. Undecided on goal

N. To move from noncredit coursework to credit course work

O. 4 year college student taking courses to meet 4 year college requirements

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

23

Appendix C

103

103A

103B

103X

103Y

104

104Y

105

107

115

115 DE

116

121

123

124

199

223

Course Sections and Enrollments fall 2010: Draft for Discussion by BSI

Data from Saturday, August 14, 2010

Math

Course

Math 025

Math 085

Math 095

# Sections

1

2

1

Cap

20

50

40

Enrolled

11

44

35

Waitlist

0

47

32

Math 095B

Math 095G

Math 095X

Math 095Y

Math 101 2

Math 101 DE 2

Math 101A math 101B

2

1

Math 101X

101Y

103 DE

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

100

200

100

100

80

80

6

30

100

100

40

23

1

26

15

77

35

52

14

36

26

23

21

30

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

39

2

3

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

80

120

80

100

100

40

100

40

40

120

40

35

80

40

40

25

40

67

88

31

9

18

27

7

27

33

113

28

24

52

21

21

4

16

0

0

0

33

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

26

41

8

0

0

0

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

24

75

76

77

78

79

92

92L

98

98SL

116

62L

70

71

72

73

74

English

Course

Eng 62

120

120SL

150

151

1

5

1

3

2

1

1

1

1

1

4

1

16

11

1

1

1

1

# Sections Cap

1 20

1

1

19

25

25

25

25

25

278

25

448

308

25

25

0

25

25

100

100

140

40

25

8

95

93

85

38

25

5

6

-1

0

7

1

8

3

Enrolled

17

17

4

236

20

364

225

0

1

1

0

10

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Waitlist

15

15

0

16

12

118

58

Basic Skills Initiative Steering Committee

College of Marin

01 June 2011

25

Appendix D

The Student Equity policy adopted by the California Community Colleges Board of Governors in 1992 requires that each community college district develop a plan to address equity on each college campus (Title V, 54220). The goals in the Student Equity Plan align with the areas of excellence in Transfer, Basic Skills and ESL in the College’s Educational Master Plan*. The California Community College Chancellor’s Office

(CCCCO) requested evaluation for five equity indicators: Access, Course Completion, ESL and Basic Skills Completion (now known as Student

Improvement Rate), Degree and Certificate Completion and Transfer. The research is summarized thusly: Even though ethnic minorities represent a higher percentage of the College’s credit student population than their representation in the County’s population, the course success rate for ethnic minorities is generally lower when compared to the course success rate for White students. Moreover, the course completion rates have varied among ethnic minorities. In particular, course success rates for African-American and Latino students lag behind those of white and Asian students.

Goals:

* Check the Ed Master Plan

1. Access

1.1: Increase enrollment of ethnic minorities over a three-year period by increasing awareness of COM’s offerings and support services.

1.2: Improve the physical access of both campuses for disabled students.

1.3: Increase access to College services and information for non-native English speakers.

2. Course Completion

2.1: Increase the course completion rates of ethnic minorities over the next 5 years.

2.2: Increase course completion rates among identified populations through specific interventions based on data and best practices.

3. ESL and Basic Skills Completion

3.1: In three years, increase by 5%-10% the number of students from identified groups that move from ESL/Basic Skill courses to degree applicable courses.

3.2: Over the next five years, increase course retention through targeted intervention based on data and best practices.

4. Degree and Certificate Completion

4.1: Promote the value of receiving a Certificate.

4.2: Evaluate programs to ensure we are meeting the changing needs of students and changing workplace needs.

26

4.3: Promote the value of receiving a Degree.

4.4: Evaluate programs to ensure we are meeting the changing needs of students and changing workplace needs.

5. Transfer

5.1: Increase awareness of transfer opportunities for students from historically underrepresented groups.

5.2: Increase the number of UC and CSU articulation agreements over the next three years. Increase articulation agreements with three additional four-year private colleges over the next two years.

5.3: Create a two-year template of transfer courses the College is committed to offer by term.

5.4: Increase awareness of transfer opportunities in the high schools by outreaching to historically under-represented groups.

The Student Equity Committee will monitor and track goals and activities each semester. The departments and persons responsible for activities will submit reports to the committee who will evaluate if activities are being conducted and are succeeding. The Director of Student Affairs and

Health Center will prepare an annual report on progress.

Here is the schedule of Student Equity Plan activities with appropriate BSI initiatives in the “funding” column in blue.

1. Access

Goals Activities Outcomes Evaluation

1.1 Increase enrollment of ethnic minorities over a three-year period by increasing awareness of

COM’s offerings and support services

Increase outreach activities to high school students, parents, and counselors using multilingual informational materials, presentations, career exploration, counseling and peer guidance

Increase awareness of and satisfaction with COM’s programs and services to traditional and underrepresented populations; Materials are created and disseminated to show COM’s success in transfer and career development

Design and conduct research from high schools as to how we can better meet the needs of students transitioning from high school to college

Annually and ongoing

Target underrepresented populations through presentations and community partnerships to increase awareness of

Maintain or increase the percentage of students from public high schools that enroll at COM

Statistical comparison of the percentage of public high school students attending COM

Annually and ongoing

27

Timeline Source of Funding Departments

Responsible

General Fund;

CalWORKs; DSPS;

EOPS; Financial

Aid

BSI funded Juniors and Seniors Day

Research Office;

High School

Relations;

Community

Relations

Marin City Night

General Fund;

CalWORKs; DSPS;

EOPS; Financial

Aid

Research Office;

High School

Relations

courses, services and the benefits of attending

College. Areas of emphasis will include

West Marin, the Canal and Marin City.

BSI Marin City

Night; BSI members’ participation in

MarinCAN; BSI

MCF grant

(College for All

Partnership)

Focus group of disabled citizens from Marin County

2005-2008 Bond; General

Fund

1.2 Improve the physical access of both campuses for disabled students

Assess and prioritize areas where problems have been identified and incorporate into construction priorities from new bond funding

Finish completing the top five priorities within three years.

1.3 Increase access to

College services and information for nonnative English speakers

Develop bilingual phone and web infrastructure to provide access to nonnative English speakers

The number of non-native

English speakers attending

COM will increase by 5% over the next two years

Statistical comparison using baseline data will be done;

A survey will be given to measure ease of access for non-native English speakers

Begin

Spring

2006

General Fund

BSI Child Care

Translation

Project; BSI

Financial Aid

Translation

Project

College

Operations; DSPS

Community

Relations;

Information

Technology Dept;

Research Office

28

2. Course Completion

Goals Activities Outcomes

2.1 Increase the course completion rates of ethnic minorities over the next 5 years

Track identified populations to determine courses with lowest completion rates compared with the general population

Awareness of areas where course completion needs most improvement

Evaluation

Completed report

Conduct surveys with focus groups to gain a deeper understanding of minority needs

Gain a deeper understanding of why students are failing and/or dropping courses

Completed report

Analysis support programs already in place and look for areas needing improvement

Greater awareness of specific areas that lack support

Report on impact of existing support services

2.2 Increase course completion rates among identified populations through specific interventions based on data and best practices

Identify successful programs from other community colleges using state-wide data.

List of colleges with successful course completion

Review list to determine what would be most effective at COM

Timeline

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

Contact successful programs to determine their practices

More in-depth knowledge of proven best practices

Report on best practices

Source of Funding

General Fund; DSPS;

EOPS; Matriculation

Departments

Responsible

Research Office

General Fund

General Fund

Enrollment Services

Tutoring; College

Success Council;

Enrollment Services

Spring 2005

General Fund

BSI funded Saturday

Services and Road to

Success; BSI grants placed student tutors in math 95 section

Enrollment Services

BSI increased math lab hours and funded tutor presentations in math 95 classes

Matriculation ; BSI funded faculty travel to conferences and statewide BSI meetings

Enrollment Services

29

2. Course Completion (Continued)

Goals Activities

Design programs and interventions, using state of the art technology, to improve course completion rates

New programs and interventions in place

Outcomes Evaluation

Describe new programs and interventions and document number of student participants

Timeline

Fall 2005

Source of Funding

General Fund; DSPS;

Matriculation

Departments

Responsible

College Success

Council

BSI funds Transfer

Prep Academy and

Learning Communities

Coordinator position

Basic Skills Math tutors

Spring 2006 -Fall

2006

General Fund; DSPS;

Matriculation

College Success

Council; Enrollment

Services

Implement programs at

College of Marin based on successful practices used at other colleges

Measure impact of new programs and interventions compared to baseline data

Greater understanding of which interventions were most successful

Report on impact of new programs on course completion

Spring 2007 General Fund Research Office;

Enrollment Services

Provide staff development program workshops to assist faculty and staff improve service to historically underrepresented groups

30% of the classified staff will have attended a workshop in a two year-period

Staff will complete an evaluation form to measure the effectiveness of training

Fall 2005-Spring

2007

General Fund

BSI funded basic skills half-day faculty training in January

2009 (Kathe German) and E3’s 21 st Century

Teaching Academy

Enrollment Services

30

3. ESL and Basic Skills Completion

Goals Activities Outcomes Evaluation Timeline

3.1 In three years, increase the number of students from identified groups that move from

ESL/Basic Skill courses to degree applicable courses

Track identified populations to determine persistence issues related to course sequence

Awareness of persistence issues related to course sequences

Completed analysis and reports

Spring 2005

Conduct surveys with focus groups

To gain deeper understanding of barriers students encounter that affect persistence

Conduct analysis of support programs already in place and look for areas needing improvement

Greater awareness of areas that lack support

Completed analysis and reports

Report on impact of existing support services

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

3.2 Over the next five years, increase course retention through targeted intervention based on data and best practices

Identify successful programs at other community colleges using state-wide data.

Contact successful programs to determine their practices

List of colleges with successful course completion

More in-depth knowledge of proven best practices

Review list to determine what would work best at

COM

Report on best practices

Spring 2005

Spring 2005

Source of Funding Departments

Responsible

Research Office General Fund

BSI piloted a dedicated tutor for

98SL and funded an investigation of best practices by ESL instructors

General Fund;

Matriculation

Communications; English;

ESL; Math; Enrollment

Services

General Fund

General Fund;

Matriculation

Matriculation

Tutoring Dept.; College

Success Council;

Enrollment Services

Communications; English;

ESL; Math; Enrollment

Services

Counseling; Enrollment

Services

Design programs and interventions to improve course completion

New programs and interventions in place

Describe new programs and interventions and document number of

Basic Skill/ESL student participants

Fall 2005 General Fund;

Matriculation

College Success Council

Implement new programs and interventions to improve course completion

Measure the impact of programs and interventions as compared to baseline data

Greater understanding of which interventions were most successful

Report on impact of new programs on course completion

Spring 2006 -Fall

2006

General Fund

BSI faculty grants placed student tutors in math 95 section, increased math lab hours and funded tutor presentations in math 95 classes, funded creation of common curriculum for ENG92L.

College Success Council;

Enrollment Services

Spring 2007 General Fund

The BSI 98SL dedicated tutor project has produced data about student success rate and will track this improvement going forward through the sequence

Research Office;

Enrollment Services

32

4. Degree and Certificate Completion

Goals Activities Outcomes Evaluation

4.1 Promote the value of receiving a In high school outreach

Certificate activities incorporate information on the value of receiving a Certificate

Increase the number of students Survey students to receiving certificates, including

Skills Certificates, by 10% over obtain feedback the next three years

Timeline

Fall 2005 ongoing

Source of Funding

General Fund

BSI provided supplementary funding to the MCF-funded

VESL project

Departments

Responsible

High School

Relations

General Fund Enrollment Services Hold Success Workshops to provide new students with information on different programs and obtain names of students interested in earning a Certificate

Increase the number of students receiving certificates, including Skills Certificates, by

10% over the next three years

List of potential students Fall 2005 onto contact and follow-up going

Track students from beginning of program until program is completed

Increase number of students receiving certificates, including

Skills Certificates, by 10% over the next three years

Send letter to follow-up and see if students are continuing

Fall 2005 Ongoing

General Fund Enrollment Services

Student Learning

Conduct a separate workshop for students working on a Certificate

Students will gain a greater understanding on specific program requirements

Survey students to obtain feedback

Fall 2005 ongoing

General Fund

4.2 Evaluate programs to ensure we are meeting the changing needs of

Hold a Job Fair specializing in jobs for students working students and changing workplace needs on a Certificate

Increased awareness of job opportunities

Develop new Skills

Certificates that meet the changing needs of the workplace

Increase number of students who receive certificates, including Skills Certificates, by

10% over the next three years

Survey of employers and Fall 2005 and students to obtain annually feedback

Statistical comparison with baseline data

Begin process

Fall 2005

General Fund

General Fund

Student Learning

Counseling

Job Placement

Student Learning

33

Work with business advisory Increase number of students groups to identify challenges for under-served groups who receive certificates, including Skills Certificates, by

10% over the next three years

Statistical comparison with baseline data

Fall 2005 and on-going

General Fund

General Fund Develop a process for tracking Skills Certificates

We will know how many students have received a Skills

Certificate and have baseline data for comparison

Baseline data to make comparisons against

Spring 2006

Student Learning

Research Office

4. Degree and Certificate Completion (Continued)

Goals Activities Outcomes

4.3 Promote the value of receiving a Degree

Incorporate information about the value of a degree in high school outreach activities

Evaluation

Increase number of students receiving degrees by 5% over the next three years

Statistical comparison with baseline data

Timeline

Fall 2005 ongoing

Source of Funding

General Fund

Develop marketing material for current students describing the value of a degree and increased earning potential

Increase number of students receiving degrees by 5% over the next three years

Statistical comparison with baseline data

Begin Fall 2005 General Fund

Fall 2005 on-going General Fund Hold Success Workshops to provide new students with information on different programs and obtain names of students interested in earning a

Degree

Increase number of students receiving degrees by 5% over the next three years

List of potential students to contact and follow-up

Send letters to students to inform them how close they are receiving degrees by 5% over the to completing degree

Increase number of students next three years

Follow-up letter Fall 2005 General Fund

Departments

Responsible

High School

Relation

Community

Relations

Enrollment

Services

Student

Learning

34

requirements

4.4 Evaluate programs to ensure we are meeting the changing needs of students and changing workplace needs

Hold a job fair for students working on a degree

Develop criteria for degree expansion, phase-out and discontinuance

Increased awareness of job opportunities

Alignment between program curricula and workforce requirements

Survey of employers Begin process Fall and students to obtain 2005

General Fund feedback

Academic program review by discipline of underserved populations

Begin process

Spring 2006

General Fund

Job Placement

Student

Learning

5. Transfer

Goals Activities Outcomes Evaluation Timeline Source of Funding

5. 1 Increase awareness of transfer opportunities for students from historically under- represented groups

Design a project tailored to support

African American students which includes identifying the transfer cohort, identifying their barriers and intervention and support mechanisms necessary for the students to succeed.

Increase the number of students who successfully complete a transferable

Math and transferable

English course at College of Marin by 10% within three years in credit courses.

Phase I

1. Planning

 Identify potential transfer cohort

Identify barriers effecting students

 Design intervention and support mechanisms

Phase II

Increase the number in the identified cohort who successfully complete a transferable Math and

English course as well as

12 additional transferable units by 5% within three years in credit courses

Track cohort of students to increase completion and success rates and compare with previous data using a similar cohort

Begin 2006-2007 General Fund;

Matriculation

Spring 2006-

Fall 2006

2. Implementation

Departments

Responsible

Enrollment

Services;

Research Office;

Counseling Dept;

Transfer Center

35

Assign Staff

Initiate project

Spring 2007

Prepare specialized student education plans for students in the cohort; Provide scholarship information and Financial Aid workshops. Assist members of the cohort in researching potential fouryear institutions.

Students demonstrate an increased awareness and transfer at an increased rate

Student survey to measure effectiveness;

Quantitative data used for tracking

Workshops beginning Spring

2005 and ongoing

General Fund; EOPS;

Financial Aid;

Matriculation

Enrollment

Services;

Counseling;

Research Office

BSI funds a .50 basic skills counselor

5. Transfer (Continued)

Goals Activities

5.2 Increase the number of

UC and CSU articulation agreements by 10% over the next three years

Identify primary transfer institutions to assess the status of the articulation agreements

Hold a Transfer Day

Identify three Bay Area

Colleges where transfer

Outcomes Evaluation

Transfer agreements will be updated

Formal confirmation of agreements with the fouryear institutions up-todate and on file..

Timeline Source of Funding Departments

Responsible

Fall 2005 General Fund Enrollment

Services; Student

Learning

The percentage of students transferring will increase by 5% over the next three years

Transfer agreements will be developed with at

Feedback from representatives; Student survey to obtain feedback

Formal confirmation of agreements with the four-

36

Fall 2005 General Fund;

EOPS;

Matriculation

Fall 2005-

Spring

Transfer Center;

Research Office

Enrollment

Services; Student

5.3 Increase articulation agreements with three additional four-year private colleges over the next two years

5.3 Create a two-year template of transfer courses the College is committed to offer by term

5.4 Increase awareness of transfer opportunities in the high schools by outreaching to historically underrepresented groups agreements will be initiated and scholarship opportunities investigated;

Communicate widely all articulation agreements with students least two of three institutions; Awareness of transfer agreements, scholarships and financial aid opportunities year institutions will be on file; Agreements will be on-line and in hard copy

2006

Identify core curricular offerings that allow students to complete courses in a timely manner. This plan will begin with

Math/Science and ESL

Transfer agreements will be available to students in a variety of formats

Conduct a variety of outreach activities on and off-campus.

Blueprint available to counselors and students;

Courses are appropriately scheduled

Agreements will be on-line and in hard copy

Compare previous rate of progress toward transfer with progress under new blueprint model; Student survey to obtain feedback

Fall 2005 General Fund

Spring

2005-

Spring

2006

General Fund

Provide parent information sessions to targeted populations

Increase number of students who participate in outreach activities by

5% over the next two years.

Student survey to measure effectiveness; Increased enrolment in college of students served by this project; Parent survey to obtain feedback

Begin

Spring

2006

Learning;

Community

Relations;

Transfer Center

Enrollment

Services; Student

Learning

Curriculum

Committee;

Research Office

General Fund;

Matriculation

BSI members wrote

MCF-funded

College for All

Partnership to increase college awareness

High School

Relations;

Counseling;

Enrolment

Services; Research

Office

37

Download