INF 385T – Popular Music Digital Space Design
Supplemental Digital Content - Evaluation
Your Supplemental Digital Content contribution will be evaluated according to:
Content: 75
Technical Production: 75
Names of Team members:
A. _____________________________________________
B.
_____________________________________________
I.
Content
High
Low
5 4 3 2 1
1. Objectives/Purpose
Was the purpose of the content clear? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
2. Accuracy
Was the content accurate? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
3. Recency
Was content up-to-date? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
4. Usefulness
Was the content useful? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
5. Relevance
Was the content connected to the class project? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
6. Motivation
Did the content encourage the viewer to learn more? . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
7. Stimulation
Did the content stimulate interest? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
8. Understanding
Did the content help viewers understand the project? . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
9. Application
Did the content suggest ways the viewer might apply
new knowledge? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
10. Reflection
Does the content encourage viewer reflection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
11. Does the content complement existing project content? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
12. Uniqueness/Originality
Is the content original? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
II.
Technical Production
13. Planning: Was the digital content well planned? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
14. Organization: Was it well organized? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
15. Structure: Was it well structured? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
16. Focus: Did it focus content on the class project? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
17. Visual quality: were images clear? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
18. Scene changes: were scene changes smooth and logical? . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
19. If used, were special effects useful? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
20. If varying camera shots are used (e.g., close-ups and long shots),
are they useful? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
21. Audio quality: is vocabulary appropriate for audience? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
22. Audio quality: was narrative speed appropriate? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
23. Audio quality: was background noise (including music) appropriate? ____ ____ ____
24. Did the audio and visual components complement each other? . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
25. If captions are used, are they clear and relevant? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ____ ____ ____
Additional Comments