ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Campus Name: Sacramento State
Please refer to the report instructions before completing this form. The instructions were sent as a separate attachment and they are also posted on the ATI Moodle Website .
1.0
Procurement Procedures
Goal
An ATI Electronic and Information Technology
E&IT Procurement Plan, documents, forms,
and other materials to support 508
procurements at the campus are created and
published.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Established  Revised Exceptions Request document
 Created and published a list of E&IT Products approved for the
entire fiscal year for purchase without re-evaluation.
 Reviewed and revised the current E&IT evaluation process to
streamline as preparation for a larger volume of evaluations to be
completed.
Key Plans 10/11


The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
Streamline EIT procurement review process (including but not
limited to reviewing the possibility of using the attachment
feature in CMS/CFS to attach ATI documents to the requisitions).
Identify ways to capture which technology purchase requests
need ATI reviews (e.g. with NIGP codes) before moving purchase
forward to Procurement.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
1.1 Developed and published an Accessible ATI E&IT
Procurement Plan
Established
1.2 Developed and published a document that defines what
products are categorized as Section 508 E&IT
procurements
1.3 Developed a procedure for procuring E&IT products at
and above the current ATI procurement threshold
Defined
07/08
Yes
Yes
Established
07/08
Yes
Yes
Comments
The new coded memo has been released by the CO office. Because of this we will now
need to revisit our ATI procurement plan to revise and update prior to implementing
new ATI procurement requirements on our campus.
Once we have revised our ATI Procurement plan we will need to update all
documentation and forms to reflect the newest version of our implementation plan.
As part of the revising of our campus implementation plan, we will look ahead and
determine the requirements of what each addition of our implementation will be for the
future and clear steps for us to follow to reach those goals. This will be completed along
with the updating of our procurement implementation plan.
1
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
N/A
Worked on
09/10?
(Yes/No)
No
1.4 Developed a documented rubric or process to determine
the level/complexity of 508 evaluation that will be
required for new procurements and/or renewals
1.5 Developed a process for all competitive bid procurements
that require an evaluation of Section 508 compliance
Not Started
Established
07/08
Yes
Yes
Standardized language for all of the campuses to use would be useful in providing a
united front in obtaining the documentation we are requesting for the ATI procurement
process.
1.6 Developed a process for all non-competitive bid
procurements that require an evaluation of Section 508
compliance
Established
07/08
Yes
Yes
Standardized language for all of the campuses to use would be useful in providing a
united front in obtaining the documentation we are requesting for the ATI procurement
process.
1.7 Developed a process for all purchase card purchases that
require an evaluation of Section 508 compliance
Not Started
N/A
Yes
Yes
Standardized language for all of the campuses to use would be useful in providing a
united front in obtaining the documentation we are requesting for the ATI procurement
process.
1.8 Documented a process used to verify Voluntary Product
Accessibility Templates (VPATs)
Initiated
08/09
No
Yes
This process will be made clearer in our updated procurement implementation plan.
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Procurement
Procedures
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
1.5
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
No

Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
1.6
Yes
Yes

Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
1.7
Yes
Yes

We would be very interested in how other campuses are using rubrics and how
successful they have been.
Comments
With the CSU mastering enabling agreements it would be very helpful for the VPAT
to already have been collected and accessibility evaluated prior to being approved as
a mastering enabling agreement.
We are always interested in receiving guidance from the Chancellor’s Office and in
hearing what other campuses are doing. This assists us in revising our policies and
procedures to make the entire process run smoother. Guidance of any kind on how
to handle procurement card purchases with relation to ATI would be very much
appreciated too, as we have not determined any methods to handle this as of yet
Working with an across campuses committee to create best practices/standards
documentation to bring the campuses closer together in process and language to
assist campuses in need of implementation and to assist other campuses including
ours in streamlining and automation of the process.
2
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
2.0
Staffing or role definition
Goal
ATI procurement team is fully staffed with
clearly defined roles for processing E&IT
procurements.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Established  Began to clarify which roles will do the accessibility evaluation of
the products
 A quick reference chart of the flow of the ATI process.
 Revised Exceptions team members and process
Key Plans 10/11
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
 Clarify roles of different parties involved in evaluation process,
requestor, procurement, specialists, and vendors. Development
of brochure for management hires about ATI procurement
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
Yes
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
2.1 Established a group that meets on a regular basis to
discuss accessible procurement topics
Managed
2.2 Identified contact person(s) and process for vendors,
purchase requestors, and staff to ask questions about
procurements
2.3 Documented in writing who is responsible for each
component of the accessible procurement process (e.g.,
Who does the purchase request? Who interacts with the
vendor on accessibility questions? Who does the
accessibility evaluation of the product?)
Established
07/08
Yes
Yes
Established
07/08
No
Yes
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Staffing or role
definition
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
2.3
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Yes
Comments
Our campus has an ATI procurement working group that meets several times per
semester in person and collaborates via email as needed. We also have an ATI steering
committee that meets approximately once per semester and via email as needed for all
three areas of ATI.
ATI procurement Compliance/Training Specialist
See Steps in Accessible E&IT Procurement and implementation plan at
http://www.csus.edu/accessibility/procure.html
Comments
We would like information as to which campuses are using a dispersed model for
collecting VPATs and evaluating accessibility and how this model is working on the
campuses, along with lessons learned.
3
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Staffing or role
definition
Indicator
Number
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Comments
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
3.0
Exemptions Process
Goal
A well-documented process has been
established and is used for exemptions to E&IT
procurements.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Initiated
 Developed a process to identify exceptions earlier in the
evaluations process. Processed several exceptions requests and
developed plans of alternative access.
 Revised Exceptions Request document
Key Plans 10/11
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on ATI coded memo.
 Streamline EIT procurement review process including exemption
process, alternate plans of access, especially as the dollar
threshold goes down.
 Conduct random follow up with requestors to evaluate
effectiveness of Alternative access plans.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
Yes
Comments
07/08
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
Yes
Yes
3.1 Established a process for granting exemptions
3.2 Documented the exemption process, posted it on public
website, and have communicated process to campus
3.3 Documented a process that ensures that supplementary
accommodations can be put in place when exemptions
are warranted
3.4 Established a follow-up process for communicating with
vendors and purchasers when a procurement is moved
forward without total resolution of the accessibility status
of the product
Defined
Initiated
Defined
07/08
Yes
Yes
This process will be updated as part of our procurement implementation plan update.
Initiated
08/09
Yes
Yes
This process will be updated as part of our procurement implementation plan update.
This process will be updated as part of our procurement implementation plan update.
This process will be updated as part of our procurement implementation plan update.
4
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Exemptions Process
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
4.0
3.2
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Yes
3.3
Yes
Yes
Comments
What are other campuses doing to communicate to their campus community, the
exceptions process and what/if any standard exemptions there are, including what the
criteria is for obtaining the exemption by the requestor?
How are other campuses following up to make sure that accommodations are available
to be put in place when exemptions are warranted? Guidance from the Chancellor’s
Office on how to accomplish this would also be helpful.
Equally Effective Access Plans
Goal
Equally Effective Access Plans are created for
E&IT products that are not fully 508 compliant.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Initiated
 Tested the Alternate Access Plan template by posting it on the
accessible procurement website for the campus community for
use.
Key Plans 10/11
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
 Streamline EIT procurement review process including exemption
process, alternate plans of access, especially as the dollar
threshold goes down.
 Conduct a random audit of departments notified during the
procurement process that an alternative plan of access was
required for their product.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
4.1 Documented a process that outlines when an equally
Defined
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
Yes
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
effective access plan is necessary
Comments
We would like guidance from the Chancellor’s Office as to whether an acceptable route
to equally effective access planning would be to obtain a letter of commitment to
accessibility containing acknowledgement of creating an equally effective action plan
based on the situation that arises for an individual, from the department making the
purchase rather than an equally effective access plan. There are some barriers in the
creation of alternate access plans because of the wide variety of possible
accommodations that may have to be created for one purchase.
5
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
Comments
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
No
4.2 Established a process with roles assigned for all parts of
creating an equally effective access plan
Initiated
4.3 Established a process that tracks how many equally
effective access plans have been created
Not Started
N/A
No
Yes
We would like guidance from the Chancellor’s Office as to whether an acceptable route
to equally effective access planning would be to obtain a letter of commitment to
accessibility containing acknowledgement of creating an equally effective action plan
based on the situation that arises for an individual, from the department making the
purchase rather than an equally effective access plan. There are some barriers in the
creation of alternate access plans because of the wide variety of possible
accommodations that may have to be created for one purchase.
4.4 Established a process to ensure that accommodations
were provided
Not Started
N/A
No
Yes
We would like guidance from the Chancellor’s Office as to whether an acceptable route
to equally effective access planning would be to obtain a letter of commitment to
accessibility containing acknowledgement of creating an equally effective action plan
based on the situation that arises for an individual, from the department making the
purchase rather than an equally effective access plan. There are some barriers in the
creation of alternate access plans because of the wide variety of possible
accommodations that may have to be created for one purchase.
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Equally Effective
Access Plans
Indicator
Number
4.2
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
No
Comments
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
4.3
Yes
No
How are other campuses tracking the equally effective access plans that have been
created? Are there any audits of the process and where they beneficial?
We would like guidance from the Chancellor’s Office as to whether an acceptable route
to equally effective access planning would be to obtain a letter of commitment to
accessibility containing acknowledgement of creating an equally effective action plan
based on the situation that arises for an individual, from the department making the
purchase rather than an equally effective access plan. There are some barriers in the
creation of alternate access plans because of the wide variety of possible
accommodations that may have to be created for one purchase.
Sample equally effective access plans that have provoked positive change and
knowledge of tracking mechanisms that other campuses are using would be useful.
6
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Equally Effective
Access Plans
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
4.4
5.0
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
No
Comments
How are campuses ensuring that the equally effective access plan was implemented and
the success of the plan?
Training
Goal
All parties involved in E&IT procurement have
been trained, and a continual training program
is in place.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Initiated
 Explored developing a brochure to be placed in new manager
hire paperwork introducing ATI procurement.
Key Plans 10/11
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
 Create a brochure and work with HR to insert into the new
managers’ hire orientation.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
Comments
08/09
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
Yes
5.1 Established and deployed new employee orientation
Initiated
5.2 Established and deployed training program for purchase
requestors
Initiated
07/08
Yes
Yes
Have collaborated with Procurement on trainings. Created a brochure to insert into the
new hire orientation.
5.3 Established and deployed training program for technical
evaluators
Initiated
07/08
No
No
Currently do not have technical evaluators on campus beyond the ATI
Compliance/Training Specialist and the Interim ATI Project Coordinator
5.4 Established and deployed training program for
procurement staff
Initiated
07/08
No
Maybe
The Procurement staff member in charge of IT is part of the ATI procurement working
group. Also has regular conversation with the ATI Procurement Compliance/Training
Specialist. With the revisions to the ATI implementation plan this will be revisited.
training materials that provide overview of Section 508
Created brochures targeted toward individual groups such as managers, staff, and
faculty providing an overview of ATI purchasing.
requirements and where to get more information
7
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
No
Comments
N/A
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
No
5.5 Established and deployed training for all purchase card
holders
Not Started
5.6 Established and deployed training for Section 508
compliance officer
Defined
08/09
No
No
While there are no formal plans to address this during this fiscal year when opportunities
for training arise the ATI Compliance/Training Specialist does date advantage of
attending or participating
5.7 Collected feedback from training (effectiveness,
knowledge retention, etc.)
Not Started
N/A
No
No
This area will be addressed once the ATI procurement Implementation plan has been
updated and a focus comes back around to training the campus community.
5.8 Established methods for retraining individuals and
departments to refresh knowledge of the E&IT
procurement process
Not Started
N/A
No
No
This area will be addressed once the ATI procurement Implementation plan has been
updated and a focus comes back around to training the campus community.
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Training
Indicator
Number
5.1
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Yes
Comments
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
No
5.2
Yes
Yes
Would like to collaborate with other campuses that have created or are creating ondemand training, including evaluating effectiveness of it.
5.5
No
Yes
How are other campuses handling ATI in relation to purchase cards?
5.6
Yes
Yes
Webinars and other training opportunities are always welcome to develop skills for the
section 508 compliance specialist and others involved in the E&IT procurement process.
6.0
Guidance from the CO would be appreciated on how to handle ATI in relation to the
procurement card purchases. Our campus chooses not to address this issue at this point.
Our goal is to begin to tackle this area once we have either guidance or have
implemented the ATI process fully into the requisition process at all levels.
Sharing the brochures with other campuses to pilot along with our campus.
Outreach (Communications)
Goal
All individuals on campus involved in the
purchasing of goods are knowledgeable about
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Established  Continued to utilize the announcements list serv
 Continued to utilize monthly ITC meetings, Business Partners
Key Plans 10/11
 Continue use of communication vehicles, including the listserv,
monthly ITC meetings, Business Partners Roundtable meetings,
8
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Goal
Section 508 in the context of E&IT
procurement.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Roundtable meetings and any other opportunities that come up
to communicate about the ATI requirements.
 Continued to look for opportunities to put information in
newsletters and bulletins that are distributed to the campus
community.
Key Plans 10/11
etc.
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
No
Comments
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
No
6.1 Created an outreach program to explain E&IT
Defined
6.2 Identified recurring vendors and educated them on
Section 508 accessibility requirements (i.e., Renewals,
maintenance agreements and ongoing purchases)
6.3 Established an ongoing general campus communication
that promotes E&IT procurement awareness
Established
08/09
Yes
Yes
Continually working with new and renewal vendors on documentation of accessibility of
their products/services on an individual basis.
Established
07/08
Yes
Yes
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Outreach
(Communication)
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
6.3
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
procurement exemptions and where to get more
Exemptions is part of the published steps in the E&IT procurement process – see
http://www.csus.edu/accessibility/procure.html
information
7.0
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Yes
Comments
Examples of what other campuses have done that were successful in outreach that
explains the ATI procurement process would be useful.
Evaluation & Monitoring
Goal
Campus has established a continual evaluation
process with standard forms and procedures.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Initiated
 Continued to review the number of purchases that are required
to go through the ATI process.
 Explored use of survey tool to obtain feedback on the ATI
Key Plans 10/11
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
9
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Goal
Feedback from the process along with
direction is provided to training, outreach, and
other groups involved in E&IT procurements.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
procurement process.
Key Plans 10/11
 Define parameters beyond $15,000 threshold, areas we want to
concentrate on with regard to reviewing E&IT requirements (e.g.
all software purchased); (some changes were implemented fall
2010 (including web consulting/contracting and development,
copy machines and networked copiers, digital media and high
impact purchases); need to clarify any other year-end
requirements.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
07/08
Worked on
09/10?
Yes/No
No
Will work
on 10/11?
Yes/No
Yes
7.1 Evaluated the compliance and completeness of
Established
Not Started
N/A
No
Yes
Exemptions include Back-Office (Includes mostly data centers and comm. closets typeequipment), Fundamental Alteration (e.g. cell phones, PDAs, pagers, hand-held devices),
and Undue Burden. We are also finding instances of Commercial Non Availability based
on department’s market research (i.e. only one product meets functional specifications).
Plan and metrics need to be updated in 10/11 based on the ATI coded memo and goals.
7.2 Metrics exist for each of the areas of E&IT procurement
(procedures, staffing, exemptions, equally effective
access plans, experience, training, and outreach)
7.3 Established metrics has led to tangible improvements in
the quality and/or effectiveness of the procurement
process
Not Started
N/A
No
Yes
Plan and metrics need to be updated in 10/11 based on the ATI coded memo and goals.
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Evaluation &
Monitoring
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
7.2
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
procurements that have exemptions
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
No
Comments
Comments
Would like to have guidance from the Chancellor’s Office on metrics as there needs to be
consistency across the CSU system so that when comparisons are made that the same
criteria are being applied.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
10
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
8.0
Experience/Implementation
Goal
Campuses have sufficient experience and
expertise in completing E&IT procurements.
Comments
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 09/10
Key Plans 10/11
Established  A larger number of departments have completed E&IT
 The E&IT procurement accessibility implementation plan in this
procurements with ATI review and now have some experience
area will be revised in the coming year based on the ATI coded
memo.
 Requested assistance to automate the process for ATI E&IT
Procurement. (Requires Chancellor’s Office intervention to
 Collaborate with other CSUs to cut down on duplication of
weave technology purchasing into Common Financial system to
product accessibility evaluations, leverage VPATs, create standard
streamline the ATI review process).
language/terminology and practices, possible use of Common
Financial System etc. The ability to share data in a common
 Worked with colleges on the campus to become more sufficient
format will save time, money and will send a stronger message to
in obtaining VPATs and conducting a first level evaluation of the
vendors about the importance of accessible products
accessibility of the product using the VPAT.
If the previous stay had not been put into place while the new coded memo was created and our campus had been required to drop down to the $2,500 we
would have had 459 requisitions to review instead of 215 requisitions. Our campus processed a total of 904 requisitions containing E&IT products during
this time period. The statistics below also do not tell the entire picture as some requisitions contained more than one VPAT to be reviewed. This was due to
some requisitions containing more than one E&IT product or multiple component products requiring separate VPATs for review. Other requisitions have
VPATs reviewed for multiple products prior to selecting a final product for purchase.
We did conduct testing on Pharos PrintSmart during this review year. The product was not a new purchase or up for review this year. Our student service
desk received a complaint from a low vision student on campus. We tested the product both using ATI staff and volunteer students from Services to
Students With Disabilities (SSWD).
SSWD has also been involved in testing of the refresh project for our SacCT/uPortal project using both staff and student volunteers.
Post purchase we are also conducting ATI staff lead testing of ServiceNow which will replace our current problem reporting product.
Success Indicator
Numeric value for
the 2009/2010 year
Comments
0
Percent value for the
2009/2010 year (# of
indicator over total # of
E&IT procurements)
0
8.1 Number and percent of E&IT products on which Section
0
0
Due to staffing no product testing was conducted prior to purchasing of the products.
Some product testing was done after purchase to plan accessibility workarounds.
508 compliance was tested
8.2 Number and percent of E&IT products on which user
accessibility testing was conducted
Due to staffing only very limited product testing could be conducted prior to purchasing
of the products.
11
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Success Indicator
Numeric value for
the 2009/2010 year
8.3 Number and percent of verifications of Voluntary Product
Accessibility Templates (VPATs) conducted
206
Percent value for the
2009/2010 year (# of
indicator over total # of
E&IT procurements)
95.814%
Comments
This calculation was created based on the total number of requisitions that should have
been evaluated with the requirement of requisitions of $15,000 or more containing E&IT
products.
Success Indicator 8.4 go to next table
Success Indicator
# Sole Brand
# undue
burden
# national
security
8.4 Number of E&IT procurements
that were granted an exemption(s)
2
0
0
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for
Experience/Implementation
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
# commercial
non
availability
0
8.1 and 8.2
Assistance
Requested?
Yes/No
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
Yes/No
Yes
8.3
Yes
Yes
# back office
# net cost
increase
# fundamental alteration
16
0
4
Comments
Due to budgetary restraints there is a shortfall when it comes to testing of products and
services prior to purchase. Because of this we are relying heavily on the VPAT or the
exception document for the accessibility of the product. Collaborating across campuses
for testing so that duplicate efforts are eliminated would be helpful. It would also be
helpful if the CO would include the full accessibility process in the MEA process. It would
greatly help this campus if we could find the VPAT as part of the MEA documentation
along with testing documentation of the product/service.
Assistance developing a more streamlined process and/or automated process for
reviewing requisitions that contain E&IT products/services. Understanding that staffing
resources are limited on our campus and others this will be necessary if we are going to
handle a larger volume of requisitions in the future.
Contributors
This information will be used for follow up questions and collaboration.
Name
Title
Email Address
Phone Number
12
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State
Dawn Futrell-Schilling
Compliance/Training – Procurement Specialist
futrell@csus.edu
916-278-7643
Melissa Repa
Co Director of SSWD/Project Director of Student
Support Services/Interim ATI Project Coordinator
Lead Buyer
repam@csus.edu
916-278-7821
clackd@csus.edu
916-278-7405
Dale Clack
13
ATI Procurement Report AY 09/10
Sacramento State