Professional and Technical Aspects of Serving FFDM Facilities Robert J. Pizzutiello, Jr., FACMP

advertisement
Professional and Technical
Aspects of Serving FFDM
Facilities
Robert J. Pizzutiello, Jr., FACMP
Upstate Medical Physics, Inc.
Overview
• What’s different about FFDM facilities?
ƒ Technology
ƒ Regulatory
ƒ Accreditation
ƒ Educational
ƒ Practical
Your first experience
The client calls
• We just ordered a new FFDM unit
• What do we do now?
•Get educated!
University of Oklahoma Digital Mammography
Productivity Study
From GE web site: http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/rad/xr/mammo/index.html
Be Prepared
• Professional symposia (AAPM, RSNA, ACR
Breast Cancer Conference, etc.)
• Manufacturer’s training
• Learn the software
• Tips on testing the machine
• Work with the service engineer during
installation
• Be an expert or…
• ………………….just wing it
My personal experience
• Attended several FFDM lectures < 1999
• Attended 8 hour ACR BCC FFDM course 1999
• Learned that first client ordered GE 2000D, with
delivery in 3 months (4/01)
• Trained with Ed Hendrick and Eric Berns
ƒ
8 hours (6 hours hands-on)
ƒ
Learned sequence of testing
ƒ
Learned tips on testing the unit
ƒ
Learned tips on working with GE and the facility
Hands-on Manufacturer’s Training
• Tuition + Travel ~ $2 - 3,000
• Your time = 1.5 - 2 days (with travel)
• Was it worth it? …Absolutely!
ƒ
Professional Confidence
ƒ
Advertise as having been trained
ƒ
Admit to my own limited experience
• My advice – invest the time and money. Your
expertise is your best asset.
ƒ
Negotiate for manufacturer to include your
training with cost of system
Before you start - Regulatory
• Remind the facility that they cannot begin
clinical work (including applications) until
ƒ
Medical Physics Equipment Evaluation is
complete and all items acceptable
ƒ
Submit materials to DMQRP
ƒ
Receive OK from DMQRP
ƒ
Latest estimate ~ 10 days after receipt of
materials
Before you start - Accreditation
• At present, ACR does not have an
accreditation program for FFDM facilities
• Facilities must have a functioning, accredited
SFM unit
• Stay tuned for ACR updates
Technologist’s QC
• Required under MQSA
• Manufacturers claim they cover RT QC
• Often, RT’s cannot assimilate everything
during applications, and QC is not clearly
understood
• QC tests are quite different from SFM, and
heavily computer oriented
• Consider a second visit to review QC. Include
in price quote
• Remind facility to allow time for weekly QC
How long will the MP survey take?
• Very little film processing (saves time)
• Software learning curve (adds time)
• MP QC learning curve (adds time)
• GE Senographe 2000D –
ƒ
7 hours for the first survey
ƒ
3-4 hours for a “smooth” survey
• What’s a “smooth survey”?
Our experience with 2000D
• Facility A
ƒ
Unit #1 Acceptance 4/01
ƒ
Unit #2 Acceptance 11/01
ƒ
Unit #2 Second survey 4/02
• Facility B
ƒ
Unit #1 Acceptance 11/01
ƒ
Unit #1 First MEE (Onyx upgrade) 4/02
ƒ
Unit #1 Second MEE (new IR) 6/02
What we learned - QC
• Before the new unit is installed, QC is not
high on the list
• GE covers QC, but there is so much other
new information covered during applications..
• After installation, technologists really
appreciate some extra one-on-one review
• QC technologists have some questions in the
first few months, then do fine on their own
What we learned – Physics
• The most common installation problems have
been with the CRT monitors
ƒ
Reading room sub-optimally configured
ƒ
Dome light meter not connected
ƒ
CRT not calibrated or incorrectly calibrated
ƒ
Calibration changes over time
8
Security of monitor settings
8
Calibration difficult w/o using laptop
Take Home Message
• Talk to the FSE during installation
• Ask for FSE to be present or available during
Acceptance Testing
ƒ
If there are apparent problems, it is in everyone’s
best interests for the FSE to be there and
participate in finding a solution
ƒ
Cannot use machine until all problems are
resolved
ƒ
Your schedule may not permit waiting for the FSE
to arrive or respond by phone
• If the unit is not acceptable and you have to come
back or delay the process, everyone loses!
What we learned
• The grid is very delicate
• Should be stored in GE-designed slot
• It is easily damaged, causing artifacts
Medical Physics QC
• Manufacturer’s QC Manual
• Hendrick-Berns Manual
• Hendrick-Berns Excel spreadsheets
• Then GE changed the manual
• Check out revision 3!
Medical Physics QC
• Consider the optimal sequence of tests
ƒ
IR uniformity and artifacts first!
ƒ
Cover IR with lead for generator tests
ƒ
Consider impact of broad area AEC
• Group tests requiring film processing
ƒ
Collimation
ƒ
Focal spot performance
• Plan for best time to test both the x-ray unit
and CRT monitors. We have had some
difficulty with CRT access.
What we learned
• Get to know the FSE’s
• Exchange phone numbers
• Buy bagels and coffee
• Promote communication between
ƒ
FSE + MP + RT
• Discuss how you will handle “major changes”
that may require MEE
Take Home Message
• Be prepared
• Discuss FFDM with potential users now!
• Advise facility to include in contract
ƒ
Mfr training to include the MP
ƒ
Mfr reimburses for re-calibrations +
additional medical physics work (MEE,
consultations) until new installation is
satisfactorily completed
Download