Contractor Evaluation OFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITY ARCHITECT

advertisement
Contractor Evaluation
Suite 101 Harbourt Hall, 615 Loop Road, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, Ohio 44242-0001
v: 330-672-3880 ▪ f: 330-672-2648 ▪ web site: www.kent.edu/universityarchitect
Company Name:
Date
OFFICE OF THE
UNIVERSITY ARCHITECT
Project Contact Name
Project No.
Trade Performed:
Site
Project Name
General
Electrical
HVAC
Plumbing
Fire
Other
(check all that apply)
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor
Lead Contractor
Subcontractor
(check all that apply)
Please rate the effectiveness of the Contractor’s performance on the capital improvement project across the
following dimensions:
Evaluation Criteria:
0 = N/A
1 = Low
5 = Moderate
10 = High
Performance Dimensions:
Value
1) Expertise, knowledge and experience
2) Problem solving and decision making
3) Timeliness and responsiveness
4) Process facilitation, communication and
partnering
5) Scope management
6) Schedule management
7) Budget management
8) Quality management
9) Risk management
10) Overall project management
Dedicated experienced people for duration of project
and maintained EDGE commitment.
Provided effective and creative problem solving,
coordination and fair decision making on project.
Performed responsibilities, coordination and provided
information/documentation in a timely manner.
Effective project documentation and communication in
facilitating a successful project.
Identified issues and effectively managed changes
within project.
Effectively managed/coordinated project schedule to
complete milestones and project on time.
Offered valuable input to owners for managing project
on budget.
Performed quality construction in a safe manner
through demonstrated QA/QC processes.
Provided prompt notification and effective action in
managing/balancing project risks.
Delivered effective overall project management for
owners.
Score
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
0-10
Total
0-100
Based on these comments, would you recommend this Contractor for comparable work in the future?
Yes
No
Please provide any comments regarding the Contractor’s performance or the quality of its work.
Comments:
Name (optional)
Stakeholder Group:
Telephone Number (optional) (
Owner
Owner’s Representative
A/E
CM
)
-
Contractor
(self representative)
If mailing completed evaluation, please forward to the address noted above, attention: Owner’s project repres entative.
KSU-OUA 10/2011 (SAO-F140-99v0609)
Page 1 of 1
Download