s\-\ \
j
p
I. /~
UBRARV
A
MARINE SC'NE
SClENGE CENTE -n~
OREGON STATE UNIVERSII•.
97365
NEWPORT,
NEWPORT, OREGON
OREGON 97365
ffi DJLVv\.L
S~. ttir.ORT
OF THE
THE TECHNICAL
TECHNICALSUB-COMMITTEE
SUB-COMMITTEE
c)RT OF
I?
OF
THE
OF THE
INTERNATIONAL
FISHERY
ERY COMMITTEE
INTERNATIONAL TRAWL FISH
Appointed By
By
Appointed
The
Second Conference
Conference On
On Coordination
The Second
Of Fisheries
Fisheries Regulations Between
CANADA
and
the
and the
UNITED STATES
I
MINUTES OF
OF THE
THE NINTH
MINUTES
NINTH ANNUAL
ANNUAL MEETING
MEETING
JUNE
1968
JUNE 25-27, 1968
SAN FRANCISCO,
FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
6
S. E. ALASKA
ALASKA
SE.
540401
1
Ii
5E
Cøp. St Jam..
52°00'
52° 00'
58
5B
~1°
50
15'
5' ________________________
SA
54
500 30'
50°30'
CANADA
30
3D
49°00'
3C
47°20'
3A
34
- - ----
WASHINGTON
460
40' ° 4 0 ' - - 46
W/I/opo Boy
20
2D
45° 46
Cope
ON
2C
44°18'
?Cape Perpetuo
28
420 50'
42°50'
42°00'
42°00'
(Cape
--------------------------------------------~
24
2A
Blanco
--------------------------------------------~··---··---CALIFORNIA
IC
IC
/
40°3d----------------------------------------------~ cope MMdno
4Q0 3d
18
18
PAcIFIc
PACIFIC MARINE
MfliUNE FISHERIES
FISHERIES cOMMIssION
COMMISSION STAl'ISTICAL
AREA~
STATISTICAL AREAS
REPORT
SUB-COMMITTEE
REPORT OF
OF THE
THE TECHNICAL
TECHNICAL SUB-COMMITTEE
OF THE
THE
OF
INTERNATIONAL
FISHERY COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE
INTERNATIONAL TRAWL
TRAWL FISHERY
Appointed By
By
Appointed
The Second
Second Conference
Conference on
on Coordination
Coordination
The
Of Fisheries
Fisheries Regulations
Regulations Between
Between
Of
CANADA
CANADA
and
the
and the
UNITED STATES
STATES
UNITED
I'
Minutes
of the
the Ninth
Ninth Annual
Annual Meeting
Minutes of
Meeting
June 25-27,
25-27, 1968
1968
June
San
Francisco. Caliqornia
California
San Francisco,
TABLE OF
OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS
Page
t
I.
...............................
CALL TO ORI)ER
ORDER • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
11
II.
APPOINTMENT OF
OF SECRETARY
SECRETARY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
.......................................
11
III.
III.
APPROVAL
OF AGENI)A
AGENDA ••••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
APPROVAL OF
........................
11
IV.
STATUS
STATTJS REPORTS.
REPORTS •.................................................
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2
2
............
Total Catch
Catch and
and Effort
Effort for
for the
the 1967
1967 Trawl
Trawl Fishery
Fishery............
22
2.
2. Petrale
Petrale Sole
Sole.................................................
..................... . . ............. . . .........
4
3.
3.
Lingcod......................................................
Lingcod ........
66
4.
4..
.........................
Pacific Cod
Cod .................................................
.
77
s.
5.
Pacific Ocean
Ocean Perch
Perch •.•..•...•.•••••••.•••••..••••••••••..••.•
Pacific
..........................
8
6.
6.
EnglishSole
Sole
. ........................•.•.....................
English
......
. . . . .............
9
7.
Dover
Dover Sole
Sole...............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..............
. . . . . . . . ... .. .. .. •.. .. .. .. . .. .. .. ... .....
. . . . .. *. .. ... .. .
10
REVIEW
OF DATA EXCHANGE PROCEDURES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
REVIEWOFDATAEXCHANGEPROCEDURES
.......
11
11
1.
1.
Formats and
and Procedures
Procedures of
of Current
Current Exchange
Exchange of
of Data
Data...........
•••••••••••
Formats
11
11
2.
2.
Expansion
of Data
Data Exchange
Exchange.......
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
· 12
Expansion of
12
. . . . . . . .
3.
3.
Use of
of PMFC
PMFC Data
Data Series
Series ........
•....••••••..••••.•••..•••••••••••••..
12
12
4.
4.
Groundfish Species
Species Catch
Catch Distribution
Distribution by
by Depth
Depth (Recommenda(Recommendation
2, 1967
1967 Trawl
Trawl Technical
TechnicalSub-Committee)
Sub-Committee)............
••••••••••••••••••
tion 2,
......
13
VI.
VI.
REVIEWOFCURRENTNDPROPOSEDRESEARCH
................
.......
REVIEW
OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RESEARCH
••••••••••••••••••••••••
13
VII.
REVIEWOFPROJECTSOFMUTUALINTEREST.
REVIEW OF PROJECTS OF MUTUAL INTEREST..........................
.......... * ......... .....
16
16
Action on
on 1967
1967 Trawl
Trawl Sub-Committee
Sub-Committee Recominendations...........
Recommendations •••••••••••
16
16
2.
Pacific
2.
Pacific Hake.................................................
Hake ...................
. . . . . .
18
18
3.
3.
Status of
of PMFC
PMFCBulletin
Bulletin?
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Status
7. .
. . ................................
19
19
4.
4.
Effect of Lifting Minimum Size Limits on Petrale,
Petrale, English,
English,
and Dover Sole and the Size Composition of Lingcod in
Washington
TrawlLandings
Landings...........
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Washington Trawl
. .......................
19
19
Proposals
for New
NewProjects
Projects.........
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Proposals for
. ........................
19
19
1.
1.
7 .
V
V.
1.
1.
s.
5.
ii
4
Page
VIII.
VIII.
INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS •••••••••••••••••••
INTERNATIONAL
A.
A.
B.
B.
C.
C.
••••••••••••••
20
20
the West Coast of
Status of Foreign Trawl Fisheries off the
Canada and
and the
the United
United States
States •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Canada
.................................
20
20
Recent Development in
in Fisheries
Fisheries Agreements
Agreements Concerning
Concerning
Coast Groundfish
Groundfish Fisheries
Fisheries ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
West
West Coast
..............................
20
20
~.......
.
Recommendations for
for Cooperative
Cooperative Programs for
for the
the ConserConserRecommendations
vation of
of Joint Stocks
Stocks which are
are Exploited
Exploited by Foreign
Foreign
Fleets.......................................................
21
Fleets ....................................................... 21
IX.
IX.
NEW
PROPOSALS FOR
FOR TRAWL
TRAWL REGULATIONS...........
REGULATIONS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NEW PROPOSALS
...... ...........
21
X.X OTHER
OTHERBUSINESS......
BUSINESS.................................................
21
21
.................. . ...... . ..............
22
XI.
NEW
BUSINESS...................................................
22
XI.
NEW BUSINESS..
..... .. .................
XII.
XII.
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS. . . ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
. . . . . . . . . . . . . * ..................... ~ •••••••••
22
22
A.
A.
Future Work, for . Sub-Committee Action
••••••••••••••••••••••••
FutureWork,forSub-CommitteeAction
.......
. ............
22
B.
B.
Recommendations
Parent Committee..........................
........
Recommendations to
toParentCommittee
22
22
SCHEDULE
OF OF
MEETINGS......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . .............. . .
SCHEDULE
MEETINGS•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
23
23
XIII.
23
A.
Parent Committee.
Committee.............................................
23
. ......
Parent
............ .. .............
A.
Technical Sub-Committee.
.................. . . . . . . . . . ........
Technical
Sub-Committee......................................
23
23
XIV.
XIV.
. . . . . . . . . . .
ELECTION
OF CHAIRMAN
CHAIRMAN...................
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ELECTION OF
. .....
23
23
XV.
XV.
ADJOIJRNMENT.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
...... . ....... . .............• •*....e
IJJJOURNMENT
•••• • •..........
••••••••••••••
23
XVI.
XVI.
.... .....
APPENDICES
•••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
APPENDICES................
..............
23
23
B.
B.
A.
A.
Agenda
B.
B.
Summaries of Recent Tagging of Petrale Sole
c.
C.
of English Sole
of Recent Tagging of
Summaries of
D.
D.
Summaries of Recent Tagging of Dover Sole
E.
E.
Summaries of Recent Tagging of Pacific Cod
F.
F.
Summary
Summary of
of Recent
Recent Tagging
Tagging of
of Lingcod
Lingcod
ii
Report
Report of the Technical Sub-CoD!illittee
Sub-Committee of the International Trawl
Fishery
Fishery Committee appointed by the Second Conference on Coordination
.~
of
the United States
of Fisheries
Fisheries Regulations
Regulations between Canada and the
l
DATE:
DATE:
PLACE:
June 25-27,
25-27, 1968
San Francisco,
Francisco, California
PARTICIPANTS:
CANADA
-- C.
C. R.
R. Forrester
A. W.
Argue
A.
W. Argue
M.
P. Houghton
Boughton (observer)
(observer)
M. P.
UNITED STATES
STATES
UNITED
California
-- T.
T. Jaw
Joy -- Chairman
Chairman
R. J.
J. Nitsos
Nitsos (observer)
(observer)
R.
P. A.
A. Gregory
Gregory (observer)
(observer)
P.
J. C.
G. Smith
Smith (observer)
(observer)
J.
I.
I.
Oregon
-- J.
J. M.
N. Meehan
Washington
E. Içauffman
1\auffman
-- D. E.
s.
G.
G. S. DiDonato
PMFC
(observer)
L. A.
A. Verhoeven (observer)
-- L.
CALL TO ORDER
The ninth annual meeting of the
the Technical Sub-Committee was called to
order at
at 10:00
10:00 AN
AM on
on June
June 25
25 by Chairman
Chairman T.
T. Joy
Jaw under
under instructions
instructions set
set forth
order
by the
the parent
parent committee
committee in
in 1959.
1959.
The business of the
the meeting was
was guided by
by
a prepared agenda (Appendix
(Appendix A).
II.
II.
APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY
D.
to act
D. E.
E. Kauffman of Washington was
was appointed to
act as
as recording secresecretary for the
the meeting.
meeting.
III.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda as
as circulated
circulated prior
p~ior to
to the
the meeting was approved
appreved with the
the
following modifications.
modifications.
given under
under Item
Item VII.
VII.
A
A report on
on the
the status
status of
of PMFC
PMFC Bulletin
Bulletin 77 was
was
Washington representatives
representatives requested
requested that
that the
the
Washington
11
2
2
boundary line
line between PMFC Statistical Areas 3C
3C and 3D
3D as
as it
it pertained
pertained to
to the
the
Deep be
be discussed.
discussed.
Esteban Deep
requested aa brief review
review of
of methods
They also requested
in compiling
compiling total
total effort.
effort.
used in
These topics
topics were assigned to the agenda
under Item
Item V
V (Review
(Review of
of Data
Data Exchange
Exchange Procedure).
Procedure).
under
Correspondence from the
Fisheries Research Board of Canada to the Washington Department of Fisheries
requested a review of the effect of lifting the minimum size limits on sole
and data on the size composition of lingcod In
in the Washington trawl landings.
landings.
Washington was prepared to
to discuss
discuss these
these items and
and they
they were accordingly
accordingly
assigned to Item VII (Review
(Review of Projects of Mutual Interest).
Interest).
Verhoeven requested
requested that
that Names · of Fishes used
used in
in the
the PMFC Data
Data Series
be discussed
discussed under
under Item
Item V.
V.
IV.
IV.
STATUS REPORTS
1.
1.
Total Catch and
and Effort for the
the . 1967
1967 Trawl Fishery
1967 otter trawl
trawl catch
catch by Canadian
Canadian and
and United States fisherThe 1967
men from the
the northeastern Pacific was 170
170. million
aillion pounds (Table
(Table 1).
Although
down from the record catch of 185 million pounds in 1966,
1966, the catch
cateh exceeded
the 1965
1965 catch
catch of
of 165
165 million
million pounds
poundsand
andthe.
the 10-year
10-year mean
-.ean (5
· (57-66)
of 142
142
the
7-66) of
million pounds.
pounds.
million
Total effort of 147,488
147;488 hours was a 0.9% decrease from the
157,735 hours in
in 1966.
1966.
The decline in Pacific Coast trawl production in 1967 was a result
in Canada and Washington and a generally weak
of labor and price disputes In
vessels on
on market
market limits.
limits.
market which had vessels
In British Columbia,
Columbia, where
where catches
catches were
were 32% below'
below the 1966 record
year,
a combination
combination of
of aa 4-month
4-month labor
labor dispute
dispute and
and aarket
limits placed
placed on
on
year, a
market limits
Pacific cod and Pacific . Ocean perch,
perch, their
their major trawl species;
species, had a depressing
on the
the total
total catch
catch of
of groundfish.
groundfish.
ing effect on
~
Table 1.
1.
• landings
Otter trw1
trawl
landings from
from the
the northeastern
northeastern Pacific
Pacific by
by Canadian
Canadian and
and United
United States
States vessels
vessels in
in 1966,
1966, 1967,
1967, and
and
for 1957-1966 in thousands
thousands of
of pounds.
pounds.
mean for
Mean________
Mean
B.C.
:B.C.
Wash.
1957-66
English sole
Rock sole
Petrale sole
sole
Dover sole
Rex sole
Starry flounder
Other flatfish
Pacific cod
Pacific
Lingcod
Sablefish
Pac.
Pac. Ocean perch
Other rockfish
Misc. species
Misc.
Dogfish
Animal food
food
Reduction
Total
.
-
-
-
-
142,671
% of
of total
%
total catch
Total hours
Catch/hr -- lb.
lb.
--
12,207
4,440
8,930
15,779
2,458
1,943
1,965
20,321
8,103
8,103
2,798
16,817
22,005
4,984
3,486
16,435
16·,435
-1/
NAA'
fur
NA
NA
1,243
7,235
1,302
504
21
153
457
26,803
4,337
684
5,217
542
834
370
4,849
--
3,692
1,376
2,547
1,072
89
483
215
215
9,447
5,739
245
17,417
9,314
8,641
1,381
7,212
-
1966
1966
Ore.
3,538
17
17
1,837
1,837
3,493
1,498
477
205
205
628
993
68
4,518
5,068
12
Calif.
4,841
--
2,925
10,301
1,635
284
284
1,319
--586
586
2,077
2,077
66
8,493
339
339
3
3
2,375
-
3,357
79
Total
:B.C.
B.C.
13,314
8,628
8,611
15,370
3,243
1,397
2,196
2,196
36,878
11,655
3,074
27,158
27,158
23,417
9,826
9,826
1,754
17,793
79
79
1,448
5,697
1,040
192
192
42
42
239
239
777
777
14,552
4,159
4,159
306
306
863
500
521
521
124
124
6,511
Wash.
Wash.
1967
1967
Ore.
Calif.
2,304
2,304
5,824
1,
1,771
771
3,565
3,565
1,219
277
277
245
430
1,067
67
67
1,600
4,061
7
7
--
4,162
1,879
1,830
998
129
129
1,271
166
166
8,365
5,
778
5,778
182
182
13,579
6,863
83
83
33
6,829
26,819
8
8
-
-
3,999
18
Total
-
13,738
13,738
7,584
7,584
7,411
7,411
11,967
3,152
3,152
2,575
2,575
2,559
23,347
11,741
1,953
16,060
19,573
1,040
130
19,931
26,837
-770
2,
2,770
-
7,212
7,212
1,762
1,762
788
788
1,371
1,371
-- 737
737
1,398
18
18
8,149
429
429
3
3
2,592
2,592
-
54,551
68,870
25,788
35,184
35,184
184,393
36,971
78,936
20,638
33,053
169,598
29.6
28,124
1,940
37.3
51,837
1,329
14.0
23,676
1,089
19.1
19.1
54,098
650
100.0
100.0
157,735
1,169
1,169
21.8
21.8
26,483
1,396
46.5
49,733
1,58"7
1,587
12.2
20,183
1,023
19.5
51,089
51,089
100.0
147,488
1,150
-
~
~
~
----
647
647
I
----
11 Not available
available due
due to
to incomplete
incomplete data
data for
for aome
eoae years.
years.
w
4
4
Washington showed
showed aa 15¼
15% increase
increase in
in total
total groundfish
groundfish production
production
Washington
over 1966
1966 primarily due
due to
to an
an expansion
expansion of
of the
the coastal
coastal hake fishery
fishery and
and
over
landings
from Puget
Puget Sound.
Sound.
landings of hake from
The catch of fish for human consumption
consumption
declined 12¼
12% from
from 1966
1966 due
due to
to aa 2-month
2-month price
price dispute
dispute and
and ·market
limits.
declined
market limits.
English, and Dover
In Oregon,
Oregon, market
market restrictions
restrictions on·petrale,
onpetrale, English,
sole and a decline in the abundance of Pacific Ocean perch dropped groundfish production
production 20%
20% below 1966
1966 and
and about
about 25%
25% below the
the 10-year
lO•year mean.
mean.
California trawl production showed the least change.
A 6% decline
change. A
from
chiefly by landing
landing limits
limits placed
placed on.
on. Dover
from 1966 was caused chiefly
Dover sole
sole which,
which, in
in
fleet effort
effort to
to English
English sole.
sole.
effect, shifted fleet
Similar to
to past years, the
the U.S.
U.S. groundfish production from Alaska
was insignificant.
insignificant.
2.
2.
Petrale Sole
a.
a.
Effort
Catch Per Effort
Total landings
landings by U.S.
U.S. and
and Canada were 7.4
7. 4 million pounds,
pounds, a
decrease of
of 1.2
1. 2 million
million pounds
pounds or
or 14%
14% from
from 1966
1966 and
and 17%
17% below
below the
the 3.0-year
10-year
decrease
of 8.9
8.9 million
million· pounds.
pounds.
mean of
Canada.
Canada.
Landings of petrale sole by British Columbia fishermen
from
.pounds. in 1967;
1967;
from the
the northern
northern and
and southern
southern stocks
stocks totaled
totaled 1.0
1.0million
mlllionpoundsin
about the
the same level
level of
previous. 10 years.
years.
about
of catch
catch as
as has
has prevailed
prevailed in
in the
theprevious.lO
The Canadian
Canadian catch
catch of
of petrale
petrale sole
sele from
from the
the southern
southernsteck
(off the
the lower
lower
stock (off
coast of
of Vancouver
Vancouver Island)
Island) was 265,500
265,500 pounds,
pounds, about
about the
the same
same as
as in
in
west coast
1966.
1966.
The average
average catch
catch per
per effort
effort (71
(71 pounds/hr)
pounds/hr) was also
also not
not appreciably
appreciably
different from 1966 but much lower than the mean of 170 pounds/hr for
for the
previous 10
10 years.
years.
previous
Northern stock landings
were about
landings at 765,000
765,000 pounds .were
about
26% lower
lower than
than in
in 1966.
1966.
26%
·•
5S
Washington.
Petrale
Petrale landings
landings in
in 1967
1967 totaled
totaled 1.8
1.8 lltllion
million pounds
pounds
28% from 1966 and 38% from the 1957-66,
1957-66, 10-year aean.
down 28%
mean.
Southern
Southern stock
stock
catches
catches from
from PMFC
PNFC Area
Area 3C
3C are
are down
down 52%
52% from
from 1966
1966 and
and fishing
fishing effort
effort decreased
decreased
by 51%.
51%.
Catch
Catch per
per hour
hour decreased
decreased slightly
slightly from
from 215
215 pounds/hr
pounds/hr in
in 1966
1966 to
to
202 pounds/hr in
202
in 1967.
1967.
Northern
stock catches
catches were
down slightly
from 1966
1966
Northern stock
were down
slightly from
in spite of record-high effort
effort expended
expended in
in Queen
Queen Charlotte
Charlotte Sound.
Sound.
A
14% dedeA 14%
cline
catch per unit
unit of
of effort
effort from
from 1966
1966 occurred.
occurred.
cline in catch
Oregon.
Total landings
landings at
at Oregon
Oregon ports
ports were
were 1.8
1.8 million
adllion pounds,
pounds,
3.6% less than
than 1966
1966 and
and 9.5%
9.5% less
less than
than the
the 10-year
10-year mean.
mean.
Limits on
on landings
landings
Limits
during the
the first
first half
half of
of the
the year
year were
were primarily
primarily responsible
responsible for
for the
the decrease.
decrease.
California.
The 1967
1967 landings
landings of
of 2.8
2.8 million pounds
pounds were 5%
5% below
the 1966 catch and 7%
7% below
below the
the 10-year
10-year mean.
mean.
Petrale
landings declined
declined in
in
Petrale landings
all areas
lC where
744,000 pounds
areas except 1C
where landings
landings increased 27%
27% from 744,000
pounds in 1966
1966
to 1,081,000 pounds.
b.
b.
Definition
Definitiou of
of Stocks
Analysis of
of recoveries
recoveries from
from the
the 1962
1962 Willapa Deep tagging
tagging
Analysis
study conducted
conducted by
by the
the Washington Department
Department of
of Fisheries indicates
indicates that
that some
study
interchange of
of fish
fish occurs
occurs from
from year to
to year in
in deeps
deeps found
found on
on the
the Cape
interchange
Bay. Results further
Flattery Spit and off Destruction Island and Willapa Bay.
further
indicate that
that petrale
petrale sole
sole in
in these
these three
three spawning deeps
deeps contributed
contributed to
to the
the
indicate
s'lDIIIIler
inshore
fishery
alongthe
theWashington
WashingtonCoast
Coastand
andthe
the various
various banks
banks off
off the
ser inshore
fishery
along
lover
vest coast
lower west
coast of
of Vancouver
Vancouver Island.
Island.
This predominant
predOJDinant inshore
iashore and
and northward
northward
This
movDent generally
generally complies
complies with
with the
the southern
southern stock
stock definition
definition given
given to
to
movement
Ketchen ·and
and Forrester, l96&
petrale sole off British Columbia by Ketehen
196~! particuparticularly
larly in
in its
its distinction from
from the
the northern stock found in
in PMFC Area 3D and
of the
the petrale
petrale
ll Ketchen,
Ketchen, K.
K. and
and C.
C. R.
R. Forrester.
Forrester. 1966.
1966. Population
Population dynamics
dynamics of
sole, Eopsetta
Eopsetta jordani,
jordani, in
in waters
waters off
off western
western Canada.
Canada.
sole,
153.
Can. Bull. No. 153.
Fish. Res.
Res. Bd.
Bd.
Fish.
6
northward.
The distinction of
of this
this stock from populations found
found off
off the
the
United States Coast is not as clearly defined,
defined, however, as it is evident
that
that some
some portion of
of the
the spawning
spawning populations
populations off
off the Washington
Washington Coast
interchange with deep
deep water stocks
stocks off
off Hecata Bank
Bank (PMFC
(PMFC Area 2B)
2B) and
and as
as
far south as waters off
off Eureka,
Eureka, California
California (PMFC
(PMFC Area
Area 1C).
lC).
c.
c.
Winter Fishery
The 1967-68
1967-68 winter fishery
fishery was the
the first
first to
to occur
occur following
following
rescindation of
of the
the winter landing
landing restrictions
restrictions by Oregon
Oregon and
and Washington.
Washington.
This regulation had limited petrale sole landings to a maximum of 6,000
pounds
trip from
from December 23
23 to
to March 31.
31.
pounds per boat
beat trip
The lifting
lifting of
of the
the
regulation did not result in any large-scale landings as occurred prior
closure although
although some
some increase
increase did
did occur
occur in
in Washington.
Washingtou.
to the 1957 closure
In
Washington, 1,013,000
1,013,000 pounds of
of petrale
petrale sole were landed
landed during
duriag the
the
1967-68 winter period
period of
of December
DeceJiber through
through April.
April.
However~ -winter
catches
However,
winter catches
were down in both Oregon and California and
and there
there was no winter fishery
f orpetrale
petrale sole
sole in
in 1967-68
1967-68 by
by Canadian
Canadian trawl fishenaen.
fishermen.
for
3.
3.
Lingcod
a.
a.
Catch Per Effort (Area
(Area 3C)
3C)
Excellent production of lingcod continued in 1967 with 11.7
million pounds landed,
landed, which was the
the same as
as in
in 1966.
1966.
Canada.
The total Canadian trawl catch of lingcod in 1967 of 4.2
million pounds was about
about the
the same as
as in
in 1966
1966 and
and 56%
56% greater
greater than
than the
the mean
mean for
for
10 years.
the previous 10
Sixty per cent of the catch came from grounds off
the west coast
coast of
of Vancouver
Vancouver Island.
Island.
lingcod catch.
catch.
Trawlers accounted for 58% of the annual
7
7
In PMFC Area 3C,
3C, the catch
catch was
was 1.8 million
million pounds,
pounds, approximately
the same magnitude as
as in
in 1966
1966 and
and 1965.
1965.
Catch/effort,
Catch/effort, based on
on catches
catches by
all vessels
vessels (with
(with qualification
qualification that
that lingcod
lingcod must
must have
have been
been 25%
25% or
or more
more of
of
all
I
the total
total landing)
landing) was 892
892 pounds/hr in 1967,
1967, whic:h
33% higher than
than the
the
which was 33Z
mean (672
(672 pounds/br)
pounds/hr) for
for the
the previous
previous 10
10 years.
years.
Washington.
A total
A
total of
of 5.8
5.8 million pounds
pounds equalled
equalled the
the record
record
year of
of 1966
1966 and
and exceeded
exceeded the
the 10-year
10-year mean by 41%.
41%. Major production
production (2.8
(2.8
million pounds)
pounds) came
came from
from Queen Charlotte
Charlotte Sound.
Sound.
Washington, lingeod
In Washington,
lingcod
are harvested
87% of the landings during
harvested primarily by trawlers,
trawlers, averaging 87%
the 1960-66 period.
period.
PMFC
PMPC Area 3C accounted for 2.2 million pounds, a drop of 23% from
1966.
A
reduction in
in fishing effort in
in Area
Area 3C
3C in
in 1967
1967 occurred
occurred even
even though
though
A reduction
record catch
catch per unit of
of effort of
of 918 pounds
pounds per
per hour was recorded,
recor.ded, up
up
a record
21%
21% from
from 1966.
1966.
Oregon.
Oregon.
during 1967
1967 of
of 11 million
pouau were slightly
Landings during
million poundi
above the
the 993,000
993,000 pounds
pounds landed
landed in
in 1966.
1966.
above
was far above the 1957-66
This level waa
mean catch
catch of
of 630,000
630,000 pounds.
pounds.
Califernia.
California.
The 1967
1967 lingcod
lingcod catch
catch of
of 737,000
737,000 pounds
pounds was 26%
26%
greater than
than the
the 586,000-pound
586,000-pound 1966
1966 catch,
catch, but
but was 23%
23% below the
the 10-year
10-year
mean of
of 957,000
957,000 pounds.
pounds.
mean
Area 1B,
lB, central
central California,
California, where 410,000
410,000 pounds
pounds ·
were
were taken,
taken, continued
continued as
as the
the major
major lingcod
lingcod area.
area.
4.
4.
Pacific Cod
Cod
a.
a.
Catch
Catch Per
Per Effort
Effort (Areas
(Areas 3C,
3C, 5D)
5D)
trawlers dropped
Pacific
cod landings
landings by
by U.S.
U.S. and Canadian trawlers
Pacific cod
drastically in
in 1967
1967 to
to 23.7
23.7 million pounds
pounds compared
compared to
to 36.8
36.8 million in
in 1966.
1966.
drastically
Decreased landings
landings occurred
oce.r~ed in
in all
all areas
areas but were most significant
significant in
in Canada.
Canada.
However,
the catch
catch still
still remained
remained above
above the
the 10-year
10-year mean of
of 20.3
20.3 million.
Bowever, the
million.
8
Canada.
Canada.
Pacific cod
cod catches
catches with aa total
total of
of 14.6
14.6 million
million pounds
pounds
Pacific
were again
again the
the dominant
dominant trawl-caught
trawl-caught species
species in
in British
British Columbia.
ColtDDbia.
were
This
level was
46% below 1966
1966 but was 20%
20% above the
the mean catch
catch for
for the
the
was about 46%
1957-66
period.
1957-66 period.
The bulk
bulk of
of the
the catch,
catch, almost
almost 10
10 million
million pounds,
pounds, was
was taken
taken
The
in
5C and
and 5D.
SD.
in Area
Area 5C
Narket limitations
Market
limitations severely affected
affected the
the Pacific
Pacific cod
cod
trawl production
production in
in 1967.
1967.
trawl
Washington.
Washington.
The 1967 Washington trawl catch of Pacific cod
amounted to
to 8.7
8. 7 million pounds,
pounds, down
down 8%
8% from
from 1966, however, still
still 9%
9% above
above
the 1957-66,
1957-66, 10-year
10-year mean.
mean.
the
Although landings
ladings·. in PMYC
PMFC Area 3C dropped 11%
froa
the catch
catch level
level remained
remained significantly above
above the
the 1957-66
1957-66 mean and
and
from 1966, the
catch/effort increased
increased 24%
24% over
over that
that of
of 1966.
1966.
catch/effort
Puget Sound
Sound (PMPC
(PMFC Area
Area 4A)
4A)
Puget
trawl production of
of Pacific cod continued at a record high 2.4 million
pounds landed.
landed.
pounds
A substantial
substantial increase
increase in
in effort
effort for,
for. Pacific 'cod
in Hecate
Hecate
A
cod in
Strait (PMPC
(PMFC Areas
Areas 5C
SC and
and 5D)
SD) occurred
occurred in
in 1967
1967 although
although total
total production
production
Strait
of 1.2
1. 2 million pounds was virtually equal to that of 1966.
Oregon.
Oregon.
Total landings in 1967 of 430,000 pounds were 68.5% of
the 1966 landings
landings and 55.2% higher than the 10-year average.
average.
California.
California.
5.
5.
lo
Pacific cod
cod were
were lauded
laaded.in
ill:California
California in
in 1967.
1967.
No Pacific
Pacific Ocean Perch
a.
a.
Catch Per Effort (Areas
(Areas 3B
3B to
to 5B)
5B)
The coastal
coastal catch
catch of Pacific Ocean perch dropped sharply in
1967
1967 to
to 16 million
million pounds, a decrease
decrease of 11
11 million
million pounds
pounds from
from 1966.
1966.
Declines
occurred in all areas due primarily to
to reduced
reduced availability of the
the species
species
off Oregon and landing limitations in Washington and British Coluabia
Columbia due
to poor markets.
9
Canada.
I
.
Landings in
in 1967
1967 amounted
amounted to
to 863,000
863,000 pounds,
pounds, about
about oneoneLandings
sixth the amount landed in 1966 and about 38% lower than the mean annual
catch from 1957 through 1966.
1966.
The
The bulk
bulk of
of the
the catch,
catch, as
as usual,
usual, was taken
taken
in Queen Charlotte Sound
Sound (Areas
(Areas 5A
SA and
and 5B).
SB).
The catch/effort
catch/effort in
in 1967
1967 was
1,974 pounds/hr which
which was
was about
about 28%
28% lower than in 1966 despite the
the reduced
effort and catch
catch in
in 1967.
1967.
Intra-seasonal statistics
statistics suggest that there has
has
been some reduction
reduction in
in stock
stock available
available to
to the
the trawlers
trawlers in
in Queen
Queen Charlotte
Charlotte
Sound.
Sound.
Washington.
Washinston.
Landings of
of 13.6
13.6 million pounds
pounds in
in 1967
1967 represented
represented
a 22%
22% decrease from
from 1966
1966 but remained
remained 40%
40% above
above the
the 1957-66
1957-66 mean. EightyseYen per
per cent
cent of
of the
the catch
catch came
came from
from Queen
Queen Charlotte
Charlotte Sound
Sound while
while fishing
fishing
seven
effort doubled in the
the Goose Island grounds compared
compared to
to 1966
1966 and
and· catch/effort
catch/effort
decreased 36%.
36%.
A
perch landings
landings occurred in
in all
all areas
areas
A severe decline·
decline in perch
along
the west coast
coast of Vancouver Island,
Island, especially in
in PMFC Area 3C
3C where
along the
production dropped
dropped 66%
66% from
from 1966.
1966.
Oregon.
Oregon.
The landings
landings in
in 1967
1967 were
were· the
the lowest
lGWUt on
on. record.
-record.
The
million pound.
decrease,; of
of· 22.9
million poallda
pound. f
from
1.6 :wdllion
pounds .landed
laaded was
was a.
ade~i:ease
.. 9 ·11illi01l
r • 1966
1966
ad
72% lua:
tllan the
the 10-year
10-year · mean.
~an.
and 72%
lees than
major cause
drastic deThe ••jor
caue of this :. drutic
creue seemed ·to
be the
the overexploitation
OYeruplo:ltat:lon.of
of the
the stocks.
stocks.
crease
to be
6·.
6.
English Sole
Sole
English
Coastwise catches
catches were
compared to
to
were up 1 million pounds in 1967 compared
1966.
1966.
This increase
increase was mainly due
due to
to larger
larger California
California and
and Washington
Washington
landings
1.2-million pound decline in Oregon landings.
landings.
landings which
which offset a 1.2-million
Canada.
Canada.
A total
total catch
catch in
in 1967
1967 of
of 1.4
1.4 million
million pounds
pounds was
was about
about 6%
6%
A
less
than the
the mean for
for the
the preceding
preceding 10
10 years.
years.
less than
10
10
Washington.
Landings of English sole in 1967 amounted to 4.7
million pounds of which 4.2
4.2 were used
used for
for human
human consumption
consumption and
and 0.5
0.5 for
animal food.
food.
Food-fish landings of English sole were up 13% from 1966
although slightly under
under the
the 1957-66
1957-66 mean.
mean.
The major coastal
coastal production
production came
came
from PMFC Area
Area 3B.
3B.
Oregon.
Landings
Landings totaled
totaled 2.3
2.3 million
million pounds,
pounds, sharply
sharply down
dcn from
3.5 million
1966, but the second highest year on record since 1960
million pounds in 1966,
and 14% above
above the
the 10-year
10-year mean.
mean.
Severe market restrictions
restrictions contributed
contributed to
to
the reduced catch.
catch.
California.
The 1967 catch
catch of 5.8 million pounds was up 1 million
pounds from 1966 and the largest since the 1950 catch
catch of 8 million pounds.
There was a decrease in the catch from Area 1A
lA but catches increased in all
other areas.
areas.
The largest
largest increase
increase occurred
occurred in
in Area
Area 1C.
lC.
This increase re-
flected a shift in fishing effort from deep water to intermediate and shallow
the California
California fleet
fleet in
in 1967.
1967.
depths by the
1.
7.
Dover Sole
The 1967 coastwide Dover sole catch of 12.0 million pounds dropped
3.4 million pounds from 1966 mainly due to a decline in California landings.
landings.
Canada.
Landings in 1967 were 192,000 pounds taken principally
in Area 4B (Port
(Port of
of San
San Juan
Juan area).
area).
The catch
catch in 1966
1966, was 504,000
504;00Gpounds
pounds and
the 1957-66 aean
mean 354,000 pounds.
Washington.
Washington.
The 1967 landings of 1 million pounds were slightly
1966 and
and 55%
55% below
below the
the 1957-66
1957-66 mean.
below 1966
Approximately one-half of the
1967
(Area 5B)
1967 production
production was
was landed from the Goose
Goose Island grounds
grounds (Area
5B) and the
remaining came
came from
from areas
areas off
off the
the northern
northern Washington
Washington coast.
coast.
remaining
'
11
11
Oregon.
Continuing
1967 Dover sole catch
catch
Continuing at
at a low level,
level, the 1967
of
only 2%
2% above
above the
the 1966
1966 landing
landing and
and 17%
17% below
below the
the
of 3.6 million pounds was only
10-year mean.
restriction& contributed to the
the low
low landings.
landings.
mean. Severe market restrictions
r
California.
The 1967
1967 catch
catch of
of 7.2
7.2 million pounds
pounds was the
the lowest
lowest
catch since 1959
1959 reflecting
reflecting aa decline
decline in
in market demand
demand for
for this
this species.
species.
Landings
30% from
from the
the 1966
1966 total
total of
of 10.3
10.3 million pounds
pounds and
and were
Landings decreased 30%
also
also 19% below
below the 10-year mean catch of 8.9 million pounds.
Catches
Catches in
areas were below those
all areas
those of
of previous
previous years.
years.
V.
V.
REVIEW OF
OF DATA EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
1.
1.
Formats
Formats and Procedures
Procedures of Current Exchange of Data
a.
a.
Total Effort
A
in the
the calculation
calculation of
of total
total
A discussion of methods used in
annual
annual fishing
fishing effort was
was requested by the Washington Department of Fisheries representatives due to some uncertainty about
about the
the accuracy
accuracy of
of their
their
estimates.
Reference was made to
to the
the computer
computer program
program used
used by the
the Fisheries
Fisheries
Research Board of Canada for total effort calculations.
calculations.
Since the
the methods
of collecting effort data by the two
two agencies is
is quite
quite similar,
similar, it
it was agreed
agreed
that representatives of these two
two agencies would pursue
pursue the
the subject
subject in
in greater
greater
detail by correspondence,
correspondence, if
if deemed
deemed necessary.
necessary.
(
bb.• PMFC Areas 3D and 3C Boundary Line
Washington
Washington brought
brought up
up the
the matter
matter of
of fish
fish caught
caught in
in the
the deep
deep
water Immediately
immediately south
south of
of the
the 3D
3D boundary
boundary being
being coded
coded to
to Area
Area 3D
3D rather
rather
the actual
actual area
area of
of catch.
catch.
than Area 3C, the
Apparently all
all Estevan
Estevan Deep catches
catches
in 3C
3C are
are being coded
coded as
as caught
caught in
in Area
Area 3D.
3D.
It was agreed that there should
change in
in the
the boundary
boundary line
line between
between Areas
Areas 3C
3C and
and 3D
3D and
and the
the status
status quo
quo
be no change
each country
country being
being aware
aware of
of the
the situation.
situation.
maintained with each
12
12
c.
c.
Turbot
It was suggested and
and agreed
agreed that
that the
the name
name "turbot"
"turbot" should
should be
be
changed
changed to
to "arrowtooth
"arrowtooth flounder"
flounder" where
where used
used in the PMFC
PMFC Data Series
Series and all
turbot
turbot catches
catches from
from lA
1A should
should be
be changed
changed to
to "mixed sole"
sole" since these are of
of
the genus
rather than
than Atberesthes.
Atheresthes.
genus Pleuronecthes rather
The 1967
1967 supplement sheets
sheets
will show this
this change.
2.
2.
Expansion of
of Data Exchange
a.
a.
Consideration of Recording Groundfish Caught in Shrimp Trawls
Trawis
This matter
matter appears
appears to
to be
be of
of concern
concern primarily
primarily to
to Oregon
Oregon and
and
California where
thousand to
to over one-half million pounds
pounds of
of
where from several thousand
landed by shrimp trawlers.
trawlers.
rockfish may be caught and landed
It
that
It was
was agreed that
these
circulated among the
the agencies
agencies and
and that
that PMFC will
these catch values
values should be circulated
investigate the
the possibility
possibility of
of providing
providing space
space for
for them
them in
in aa footnote
footnote in
in
the Groundfish Data
Data Series.
Series.
b.
b.
Statistical Data Being Prepared for
for Exchange with Soviet
Soviet Union
Union
the data
data being gathered for
for
Canada expressed an interest in the
exchange with the
the Soviets.
Soviets.
3.
3.
No action
action was taken.
taken.
Use of PMFC Data
Data Series
Series
At the 1966 Sub-Committee meeting it was agreed that
that summaries
of completed tagging experiments should be provided in the
the Data
Data Series.
This
agreement was reconfirmed at the 1967 meeting and formats were prepared and
and
distributed as agreed.
agreed.
It was decided at the
the 1968 meeting that
that the
the earlier
earlier agreement
agreement to
to
use the
the Data
Data Series for
for tagging
tagging summaries
summaries would
would make
make the
the instrument
instrument extremely
extremely
and that
that the
the interests
interests of
of the
the agencies
agencies would
would be
be better
better served
served if
if the
the
bulky and
tagging
tagging summaries were compiled separately for distribution.
Therefore,
13
California agreed to
to compile
compile the
the tagging
tagging summaries
summaries and
and distribute
distribute them
them to
to
-F
the agencies.
To facilitate
facilitate this
this compilation,
compilation, each
each agency
agency agreed
agreed to
to send
send to
to
California all
all tagging
tagging summaries from
from 1955
1955 to
to the
the present
present that
that are
are complete
complete
(i.e.,
(i.e., no
no further
further recoveries
recoveries expected)
expected) and also data on new and incomplete
Incomplete
tagging experiments.
tagging
It was
agreed that
that the
the formats suggested
suggested for
for exchange
exchange be
be
was further agreed
modified slightly
slightly next
next year
year so
so that
that the
the year
year of
of recovery
recovery will
will designate
designate the
the
year after tagging
tagging rather than
than the
the calendar
calendar year.
Summaries of recent
recent taggings
taggings by agencies
agencies are
are presented
presented· in
in AppenAppendices BB through
through F.
F.
4.
4.
Groundfish Species Catch Distribution by Depth (Recommendation
(Recommendation 2,
21
1967 Trawl
Trawl Technical
T.edlnical Su1
S~ttee)
Commit tee)
The advisability of recording the catch of groundfish by standard-
ized
for exchange was
Ized depth intervals
intervals for
was discussed and it was agreed that
although feasible,
feasible, a breakdown of catch by depth would not be particularly
useful.
Any agency requiring an analysis of catch
catch by depth
depth will
will use
use its
its own
own
methods.
VI.
REVIEW OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RESEARCH
Trawl research programs continued
continued at about
about the
the same level
level as
as in
ia. 1966
1966
with
with the
the exeeptien
exeepttoa. of
of . Washington
Washiqten where
where· the
the availability
Dailability of
of Federal
Federal support
support .
through PL 88-309
88-309 allowed a eignificant
significant expaasion<'
expaneion:ef
of · staff and programs.
prosrams.
Canada.
Research programs on Pacific
Pacific Coast trawl
trawl species
species are
are carried
carried
out
out by the Fisheries Research Board located at Nanaimo.
Nanaimo. Their groundfish
consisted of four
four biologists and
and eight technicians.
technicians.
staff in 1967 consisted
Two of
the technical staff had as
as their primary responsibility the collection of
the commercial
commercial trawling
trawling operations.
samples from the
vided between
between two
two projects:
projects:
Seas Investigations.
Investigations.
Other personnel
personnel were didi-
the Near Seas Investigations and the Distant
14
14
The Near Seas
Seas Investigations
Investigations has the
the responsibility
responsibility of
of maintaining
maintaining
watch on
on the
the various
various stocks
stocks which support
support the
the trawl
trawl fishery
fishery in
in waters
waters adjaadjacent to British Columbia.
A
the ~ork
involves collection
collection
A major
major portion of the
work involves
and
catch and effort and
and routine
routine biological sampling
sampling
and analysis
analysis of statistics
statistics of catch
at
the main ports of
of landing.
landing. Age
at Vancouver,
Vancouver, Steveston,
Steveston, and Prince Rupert,
Rupert, the
Age
and growth studies are being intensified on rock sole, particularly with
to the
the fishery on the
the Cape Scott Banks off the
the northern
northern end
end of
of
respect to
Vancouver Island.
Further progress was made in the program to
to measure the
the effects of
variation of environmental factors on the
the embryonic development of petrale
aXid
flathead soles.
~d flathead
soles.
Considerably more success was
in carrying
carrying petrale
was achieved in
sole eggs to
to hatching.
Work continued
continued on
on the
the suitability
suitability of
of aging
aging Pacific
Pacific cod
cod routinely
routinely using
using
otoliths.
The Distant Seas Investigations completed two
two cruises
cruises during 1967
1967 to
to
investigate rockfish spawning seasons and the bathymetric distribution of
ocean perch off southwest Vancouver Island, in south Queen
Queen Charlotte Sound
and off Cape Ommaney, Alaska.
Alaska.
to be
The ocean perch spawning period appeared to
about 30 days during March-April and their bathymetric distribution ranged
between
between 140-279
140-279 fathoms
fathoms in
in all
all areas.
areas.
Washington.
Two biologists and one scientific aide
aide were added
added to
to
total of
of five
five biologists and
and four scienthe groundfish staff in 1967 for a total
tific aides.
aides.
This increase in manpower was due to
to funds
funds provided by PL 88-
309 contracts.
contracts.
Four tagging cruises were completed
completed in 1967
1967 as
as a part of a continuing
continuing
program to determine the
the migration and distribution patterns of the
the principal
species.
trawl species.
Pacific cod, petrale and English sole were tagged
tagged during
these cruises.
cruises.
these
Three additional tagging
tagging cruises
cruises were made in early 1968 and
further tagging
tagging is
is planned
planned for
for Pacific
Pacific cod
cod and
and Dover
Dover sole.
sole.
15
15
Continuing programs included routine biological sampling of the trawl
catch
catch at Blaine,
Blame, Bellingham,
Bellingham, Everett,
Everett, and
and Seattle
Seattle as
as well
well as
as the
the collection
collection
and processing of
of basic
basic catch
catch and
and effort
effort statistics.
statistics.
A
A survey of the Wash-
ington trawl fleet as to vessel and gear characteristics was initiated as
part of an annual program to detect changes in the fleet.
fleet.
analysis of
of
An analysis
Pacific ocean perch catch and effort statistics from 1955 to present by
year, season
season and
and depth
depth was
was begun
begun for
for major
major trawl
trawl areas
areas and
and aa series
series of
of tests
tests
year,
on petrale sole,
cod, and Pacific Ocean perch samples was initiated
initiated to
to
sole, Pacific cod,
determine if
if there was
was bias present in sampling procedures.
procedures.
Oregon.
The bottomfish staff was unchanged with four biologists and
assistants.
two seasonal assistants.
aide will be added
added in
in 1968.
1968.
An additional summer aide
A total of 1,494 Dover sole were tagged
tagged during cruises
cruises in November
A
1967 and
and April
April 1968.
1968.
Market sampling continued at about the same level in 1967.
Dover,
English,
age, sex,
English, and petrale sole and Pacific Ocean perch were sampled for age,
composition.
and length composition.
tion was included.
Late in
in 1967
1967 weight
weight and
and stage
stage of
of maturity
maturity informainforma-
Animal food and Pacific Ocean perch catches
catches were sampled
for species composition.
composition.
A
A data report was published in February 1968 con-
taining
taining age-length
age-length frequency
frequency data on Dover sole landed in Oregon from
from 1948-65
from PMFC Area
Area 2D,
2D.
California.
The bottomfish staff of five biologists has remained at
the level of previous years.
Seasonal help was not available in
in 1967
1967 but
but is
is
expected to
to be
be restored
restored in
in 1968.
1968.
expected
In addition,
addition, the PL 88-309
88-309 financed
financed Shellfish
continuing.
and Bottomfish Data Analysis Project reported last year is continuing.
A
A total of 3,369 English sole was tagged and released in PMFC Area
1968.
lB
lB in early 1968.
Tagging of Dover sole in Area 1C
lC in conjunction with dis-
studies is
is planned for
for 1969 and analyses
analyses are scheduled for
for comcomtribution studies
pleted Dover and petrale
petrale sole
sole tagging
tagging experiments.
experiments.
16
16
Market sampling
sampling continued
continued in
in 1967
1967 although
although the
the level
level was reduced
reduced due
due
to less manpower.
Dover,
sampled
Dover, English,
English, and petrale sole are routinely sampled
for age,
age, size,
size, and sex composition.
for
species and size composition.
composition.
Animal food landings were sampled for
In 1967,
flatfish and 36 animal food
1967, 334 flatfish
samples were obtained.
Data systems have been designed for
for bottomfish research
research cruise
cruise data,
data,
data, and
and market
market sampling
sampling data.
data.
specialized data,
A study
study of
of the
the population
population
A
dynamics
of petrale
petrale sole
sole in
in the
the Fort
Fort Bragg
Bragg area
area was
was recently
recently initiated.
initiated.
dynamics of
trawler log books have been
been designed
designed and
and distributed.
distributed.
New
New
Changes in
in present
present
trawler log
log data processing procedures
for impleprocedures are under consideration for
mentation in
in 1969.
1969.
Other Items.
Items.
A
A cooperative groundfish age-reading unit was estab-
lished
lished between
between the State 0f
of Washington
Washington and Bureau of Commercial Fisheries
Fisheries at
at
the
the U.
U. s.
S. Bureau of
of Co~ercial
Commercial Fisheries
Fisheries Lab
Lab in Seattle to provide a team
skilled in
in the
the aging
aging of
of groundfish.
groundfish.
Initial assistance on aging Pacific
ocean perch otoliths was received from the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
Canada.
On July 1, 1968 a PMFC-sponsored
PNFC-sponsored technician was added to allow petrale sole
and English sole otoliths from Oregon and Washington to be read and to expand
the Pacific
Pacific Ocean perch reading capacity.
the
capacity.
VII.
REVIEW OF PROJECTS OF MUTUAL INTEREST
1.
1.
Action on 1967 Trawl Sub-Committee Recommendations
a.
a.
Recommendation 1.
Recommendation
1.
"That an exchange of correspondence
correspondence be
initiated for determining requirements for adequate monitoring of Pacific
Ocean perch and petrale sole stocks." -- Correspondence was exchanged between
the U. S.
S. agencies.
agencies.
Canada and the
Washington's reply explained their present
procedures and outlined current problems and mutually beneficial studies.
studies.
Washington
Washington indicated
indicated that
that it
it has initiated
initiated an
an increased
increased sampling
sampling program on
petrale and ocean perch and will begin a program of aging petrale sole on
a.
17
17
aa current basis.
Canada is
is of
of the opinion that
that definition of adequate monimoni-
toring
toring programs
programs is not possible with
with the
the present status of
of knowledge of
of the
two species
that the agencies
species and suggested that
agencies continue their present sampling
programs.
programs.
b.
b.
Recommendation 2.
2.
Recommendation
"That agencies examine
examine feasibility
feasibility of
of
determining
determining depth
depth distribution of catch for
for all species
species and be prepared to
determine a satisfactory breakdown at next year's meeting."
that although feasible,
feasible, a breakdown of
The committee agreed that
catch
catch by
by depth
depth would
would not
not be
be particularly useful and each
each agency will
will use its
its
own methods if such
such an
an analysis
analysis is
is required.
required.
c.
c.
Recommendation
3.
Recommendation 3.
"That a standardized technique for
for age
age
determination of
of Pacific
Pacific ocean
ocean perch
perch be
be studied.'t
studied."
determination
A
A cooperative age-reading unit has been established in WaahingWashington .State
State (see Item VI,
VI, Other
Other Items)
Items) with
with consultation on Pacific
Pacific Ocean
Ocean perch
perch
from Fisheries
Fisheries Research
Research Board
Board of
of Canada
Canada personnel.
personnel.
aging received from
samples have been exchanged with Canada and readings
readings compared.
compared.
Otolith
It was agreed
that progress is
is being made and
and that
that aa further
further exchange
exchange of
of Pacific Ocean
that
perch and in addition petrale sole otolith samples should take place between
u.
S. age-reading
age~reading unit for
for
the Fisheries Research Board of Canada and the U. S.
agreement comparison.
comparison.
agreement
d.
d.
Recommendation
4.
Recommendation 4.
"Reaffirmation
"Reaffirmation of
of Sub-Counnittee
Sub-Committee recommen-
dations 2 and 3 of the seventh annual meeting that all agencies submit for
dations
inclusion In
in the
the PMFC Data Series
Series tagging
tagging summaries
summaries of
of terminated
terainated experiments
experiments
inclusion
and inventories of all tagging experiments."
tagging
Formats for tagging data summaries and inventories of tagging
experiments were prepared and distributed to Sub-Committee members for approval.
approval.
18
18
e.
e.
llecommendation
5.
Recommendation 5.
"That computer programs and card design
be exchanged
exchanged among
among agencies
agencies with
with each
each agency
agency listing
listing the
the titles
titles and
and language
language
be
of available programs."
Lists of computer programs in use were exchanged between
agencies.
agencies.
It was agreed that any agency wishing a print out of a program in
use should write to
to the
the agency
agency for
for aa copy.
copy.
2.
2.
Rake
Pacific Hake
Washington presented a report on the 1967 hake fishery off the
Washington coast
coast and
and the
the 1967-68
1967-68 winter
winter fishery
fishery in
in Puget
Puget Sound.
Sound.
In Puget
Sound the 1967-68 hake landings may reach 8 million pounds,
pounds, down from the
10.7 million landed
landed in
in 1966-67.
1966-67.
Fishing success was poorer because fewer
boats were equipped with telemetry gear for controlling their net and in
Of f
addition market demand and prices were down from the previous season.
season. Off
coast, the 1967 hake fishery landings totaled 19.3 million
the Washington coast,
pounds.
pounds.
The fishermen were experiencing excellent fishing from late
late May
until they ceased fishing August 5 simultaneously with the termination of
guarantee provided
provided by
by the
the Federal
Federal Government.
Government.
the daily vessel guarantee
The 12-
limit law
law and
and U.S.-Soviet
U.S.-Soviet fishing
fishing agreement
agreement have
have eliminated
eliminated much
much of
of the
the
mile limit
conflicts in
in the
the coastal
coastal hake
hake fishery.
fishery.
conflicts
The large Soviet fleet landed an
estimated 300 million pounds of hake from coastal
coastal waters off northern
California to
to northern
northern Washington
Washington in
in 1967.
1967.
It was
was announced that no U.
It
U. S.
s.
coastal hake fishery will occur in 1968 since the $20 per ton offered to
the fishermen was insufficient to
to attract sufficient vessels to begin a productive operation.
the discussion of the
the hake fishery,
fishery, the
the Sub-Committee
Following the
agreed that it is of international concern but not with respect to the
S.
Technical Sub-Committee.
Sub-Committee.
19
19
3.
3.
Status of PMFC Bulletin
Bulletin 77
that PMFC Bulletin 7,
7, which is
is devoted entirely
Verhoeven reported that
to
to reports
reports on
on groundfish
groundfish studies,
studies, should
should be
be ready
ready for
for publication
publication late
late in
in
1968.
1968.
An addenda
addenda to
to the
the groundfish
groundfish bibliography
bibliography was
was distributed
distributed by
by Washington.
Washington.
4.
4.
Effect of
of Lifting
Lifting Minimum Size Limits
Limits on Petrale,
Petrale, English,
English, and
Dover Sole and the Size Composition of
of Lingcod
Lfngcod in Washington
Trawl Landings
Landing
length frequencies of English and Dover sole
Washington presented length
from port sampling to show that very few fish
fish are brought in below 11.5 to 12
inches.
Significant
Significant changes
changes in Washington State trawl regulations
regulations and
groundfish utilization restrictions
restrictions were
were implemented
implemented November
November 15,
15, 1967.
1967.
Discussion on the
the effects
these regulation changes
effects of these
changes which ensued was
was
primarily centered on the elimination of utilization restrictions
restrictions on virvirtually all
all species and
and rescinding
rescinding of
of minimum
minimum size
size limits
limits on
on petrale,
petrale, Dover,
Dover,
tually
and English sole.
the size composition of the
the landings
Very little change in the
or in utilization has been
been observed
observed to
to the
the present
present time.
time.
the size composition of lingcod
lingcod landed
landed in Washington in
Data on the
the
of 1968 were
were presented which showed that approximately 102
the spring of
10% to
202
of the
west coast of
20% of
the landings
landings from Queen Charlotte Islands and the lower w.es.t
Vancouver Is
Island
the present
present minimum
minimum In
in Canada.
Canada.
Vancouver
land were
were composed
composed of
of sizes below the
all of
of these
these fish
fish were utilized for
for human consumption.
consumption.
Virtually all
A
A synopsis of the Washington trawl regulations will be included
In the 1968 PMFC data
in
data series.
5.
5.
Proposals for
for New Projects
It was
was agreed that Canada and Washington would exchange petrale
sole otoliths for comparing age determinations
determinations to aid in the joint monitoring of the
the status of
of this
this species.
species.
20
20
VIII.
INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS
INTERNATIONAL
A.
A.
Status
Status of Foreign Trawl Fisheries
Fisheries off the West Coast of Canada
and the United States
Canada reported that a noticeable reduction in foreign fleet
fleet
activities occurred off British
British Columbia
Columbia in
in the
the past
past year.
year.
Presently about
two vessels are
are fishing
fishing off
off the
the upper
upper end
end of
of the
the Queen
Queen Charlotte
Charlotte Islands,
Islands,
two
both Soviet and
and Japanese.
Japanese.
Russia appears
appears to be recognizing Canada's
Canada's 12-mile
limit but Japan
Japan does
does not.
not.
It was
that a Russian freighter was
loading
was noted that
was loading
Washington.
produce and supplies in Canada and supplying vessels off Washington.
The
Japanese are longlining
longlining for
trawling for perch off Queen Charlotte
for blackcod and trawling
Charlotte
Sound.
1968 Oregon reported
reported 40-50
40-50 foreign trawlers
trawlers off the
the
During June 1968
coast and that stern trawlers
trawlers are
are replacing
replacing side
side trawlers.
trawlers.
Estimates of
of
Soviet catches given were:
1967 Soviet Catch off U.
U. S.
S. Pacific
Pacific Coast
Coast- About
About 196,000
196,000 Metric
Metric Tons.
Tons.
120,000 M.T.
M.T.
Washington-Oregon
Pacific hake
Pacific Ocean perch
112,500
112,500 M.T.
M.T.
7,500
7,500 M.T.
MT.
73,000 M.T.
MT.
73,000
California
Pacific hake
Rockfish species
(balance of total)
total)
40-50,000 M.T.
M.T.
23,000 M.T.
1967 Soviet catch off Mexico --About
20,000 Metric
Metric Tons.
Tons.
About 20,000
These figures represent
represent the
the first
first 11
11 months
months of
of 1967.
1967.
variation in the
the final
final catch
catch statistics may change
change the
the totals.
totals.
A
A minor
Source was
Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Market News Service.
Service.
B.
B.
Agreements Concerning West
West Coast
Recent Development in Fisheries Agreements
Groundfish Fisheries
The current status of the existing agreement with the Soviet Union
Union
was reviewed.
reviewed.
A
A negotiations
negotiations meeting with
with the Soviets in December 1967 in
21
21
C. resulted
resulted in
in the
the renewal
renewal of
of the
the February
February 1967
1967 fishing
fishing agreeagreeWashington, D. C.
inent for
for one
one more
more year.
ment
A meeting of scientists of the
the two
two countries
countries was
A
held in Seattle in
in July
July 1967.
1967.
and statistical
statistical data
data
Exchange of biological and
and certain cooperative research programs on Pacific hake and
and Pacific Ocean
perch was
was agreed upon pending formal approval by the
the governments of both
countries.
countries.
It was announced that the
the Japanese have agreed verbally to
to observe
u.
the restricted areas established
established under the
the February 1967
1967 U. S.-Soviet
S.-Soviet fishing
fishing
the
agreement.
C.
C.
Coo~erative Programs for the
the Conservation
Conservation of
of
Recommendations for Cooperative
Foreign Fleets
Fleets
Joint Stocks which are Exploited by Foreign
there were no new cooperative
cooperative programs
programs recommended,
recommended, the
the
Although there
Sub-Committee reaffirmed the
the desirability of continuing
continuing to
to monitor ocean
to exchange sampling data
data with special emphasis
emphasis
perch and petrale stocks and to
on the winter petrale sole fishery and the
the establishment of uniform
uniform aging
aging
for petrale
petrale sole.
sole.
techniques for
IX.
IX.
NEW PROPOSALS FOR
FOR TRAWL
TRAWL REGULATIONS
REGULATIONS
No proposals for new trawl
trawl regulations
regulations were advanced by Canada
Canada or the
the
U. S.
S.
Oregon reported
reported that
that her trawl
trawl industry
industry and
and fishermen
fishermen have
have requested
requested
limits on sole.
a relaxation in the incidental catch limits
action has been
been taken.
taken.
No action
In California there are bills in the
the legislature
legislature proposing to
to open some inshore
(waters inside
inside 33 miles
miles from
from shore)
shore) to
to trawling.
trawling.
areas (waters
· Washington also
also reported
reported that
that it
it is
is studying
studying the
the possibility
possibility of
of aa
change for
for trawl
trawl cod
cod ends
ends in
in Puget
Puget Sound
Sound and
and the
the Strait
Strait of
of Juan
Juan de
de
mesh size change
Fuca.
X.
X.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Sub-Committee agreed to
to some changes in the
the tables
tables of the
the PNFC
PMFC
Data Series.
Series.
In the table
table listing animal food the Pacific sand dab
dab would
22
be listed
listed as
as a separate species and flathead sole would be included under
mixed sole.
sole.
In place of
of scrapfish,
scrapfish, aa miscellaneous
miscellaneous heading would be pro-
vided.
XI.
NEW BUSINESS
The projected opening of the
the new $$ 11 million fish meal reduction
reduction plant
on
on the
the Makah
Makah Indian Reservation at Neah
Neah Bay,
Bay, Washington
Washington was
was discussed.
discussed. The
company
company is
is financed
financed through
through aa $791,000
$791,000 combination loan and grant approved
through the Economic Development Administration.
through
Administration.
Present plans are to
to utilize
any and all combinations of fish species delivered to
to the plant.
The WashingThe
ton
of Fisheries
Fisheries will
will monitor
monitor the
the landings
landings asas totospecies
speciescomposicompositon Department of
tion and obtain biological data
data such as
as length
length and
and age
age on
on the
the principal
principal species
species
being processed.
XII.
XII.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A.
A.
Work, for
Future Work,
for Sub-Committee Action
The Sub-Committee recommends:
recommends:
1.
1.
that the impending expansion of the aultiple-use
that
multiple-use fishery be
monitored and reported
reported on at
at the
the next meeting;
2.
2.
that the agencies continue to exchange any new computer prothat
gram useful in groundfish studies.
studies.
B.
B.
Recommendations to Parent Committee
Recommendations
1.
1.
The Technical Sub-Committee acknowledges the
the expansion of the
the
the United States in recent
recent years and
and reaffirms
reaffirms Recomgroundfish programs in the
mendation 22 of
of the
the 1966
1966 Annual
Annual Meeting
Meeting to
to the
the Parent
Parent Committee
Committee wherein
wherein the
the
mendation
is emphasized as
as well as
as
inadequacy of current knowledge of important stocks is
need for
for "intensification of research programs
programs to provide the necessary
the need
information for precise assessments of the
the various species involved".
involved 11 •
23
23
2.
2.
The Technical Sub-Committee reaffirms Recommendation 3 of the
the
1967
that the
the
1967 Annual
Annual Meeting
Meeting to
to the
the Parent
Parent Committee which
which "recommends
"recommends that
International Trawl Fishery Committee should attempt to
to obtain
obtain data on catch
catch
by species and effort expended
expended by nationals,
nationals, other
other than
than those
those of
of Canada
Canada and
and
the
the United
United States,
States, fishing
fishing off
off the
the West
West Coast of
of the United States and Canada".
Canada".
XIII.
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS
A.
A.
Parent Committee
The International Trawl Fishery
Fishery Committee
Committee will meet the
the afternoon
afternoon
of
20, 1968
1968 at
at Coeur
Coeur d'Alene,
d'Alene, Idaho.
Idaho.
of November 20,
B.
B.
Technical Sub-Committee
tenth annual meeting will be held in
in Seattle,
Seattle, Washington
Washington during
during
The tenth
June 1969.
1969.
XIV.
ELECTION OF
OF CHAIRMAN
CHAIRMAN
C.
R. Forrester,
C. R.
Forrester, Fisheries Research Board of
of Canada,
Canada, was elected
elected
Chairman.
XV.
XV.
ADJOURNMENT
The Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 PM June 1968.
1968.
XVI.
XVI.
APPENDICES
A,
A..
Agenda
B.
B.
Summaries
Summaries of
of Recent Tagging of Petrale Sole
C.
c.
Summaries of Recent Tagging of
of Eng1ish
Sole
English Sole
D.
D.
Summaries of Recent Tagging of
of Dover Sole
Sole
E.
E.
Cod
Summaries of Recent Tagging of
of Pacific Cod
F.
F.
Summary of Recent Taggirg
Tagging of Lingcod
Summar!
A-1
Appendix A-i
AGENDA AS ADOPTED
TECHNICAL SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE
INTERNATIONAL TRAWL FISHERY COMMITTEE
SAN FRANCISCO JUNE 1968
9TH ANNUAL MEETING
I.
I.
II.
II.
III.
III.
IV.
IV.
CALL TO ORDER
APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY
SECRETARY
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STATUS REPORTS
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
6.
6.
7.
7.
V.
V.
REVIEW OF DATA EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
VI.
Total
for the 1967 Trawl Fishery
Total Catch and Effort for
Petrale Sole
a.
a.
Catch/Effort
b.
Definition of Stocks
b.
c.
c.
Winter Fishery
Fishery (±
(t 100
100 Fathoms)
Fathoms)
Lingcod
a.
a.
Catch/Effort (Area
(Area 3C)
JC)
Pacific Cod
a.
Catch/Effort (Areas
(Areas 3C,
Jet 5D)
SD)
a.
Pacific Ocean Perch
a.
Catch/Effort (Areas
(Areas 3B
3B to
to SB)
SB)
a.
English Sole
Dover Sole
Formats and Procedures of Current Exchanges of Data
a.
Total Effort
a.
b. PMFC Areas 3D and 3C Boundary Line
b.
c. Turbot
c.
Expansion of Data Exchange
Consideration of
a.
Consideration
of Recording
Recording Groundfish
Groundfish Caught
Caught inin Shrinip
Shrimp Trawis.
Trawls.
a.
h. Statistical Data Being Prepared for
for Exchange
Exchange with
with Soviet
Soviet Union.
Union.
b.
Use of PMFC Data Series
Groundfish Species Catch Distribution by Depth (1967
(1967 T.S.C.
T.s.c.
Groundflsh
Recommendation
Recommendation 2)
2)
REVIEW OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RESEARCH
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
Tagging
Tagging
Biological Studies
Sampling Program
Pro~ram
Special Projects (IDS
(IDS && US PL
PL 88-309)
88-309)
Studies
Other Studies
Appendix A-2
A- 2
VII.
VII.
REVIEW OF PROJECTS OF MUTUAL INTEREST
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
VIII.
VIII.
INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
IX.
IX.
X.
X.
XI.
XI.
XII.
XII.
OTHER BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
RECOMMENDATIONS
XV.
XV.
Future Work
Parent Committee
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS
1.
1.
2.
2.
XIV.
XIV.
Status of Foreign
Foreign Trawl
Trawl Fisheries
Fisheries Of
Offf the
of Canada
Canada and
and
the West
West Coast of
the
the United States
Recent
Developments in
in Fisheries
Fisheries Agreements
Concerning West
West Coast
Coast
Recent Developments
Agreements Concerning
Groundfish Fisheries
Fisheries
Groundfish
Conservation of
Recommendations
for Cooperative Programs
the Conservation
of
Recommendations for
Programs for
for the
Joint Stocks
Stocks Which
Which Are
Are Exploited
Exploited by
by Foreign
Foreign Fleets
Fleets
Joint
NEW PROPOSALS FOR TRAWL REGULATIONS
1.
1.
2.
2.
XIII.
XIII.
Action
on 1967
1967 TSC Recommendations
Action on
a. Recommendation
1. Monitoring of mutually exploited stocks of
of
Recommendation 1.
a.
petrale and Pacific Ocean
Ocean perch.
perch.
b. Recommendation
2. Depth distribution
distribution of
of catch
catch for
for all
all species.
species.
Recommendation 2.
h.
Standardized
technique
for
age
determination
c.
Recommendation 3.
3.
for age determination
Recommendation
c.
of
perch.
of Pacific Ocean perch.
d.
Recommendation
4. Tagging data for
for inclusion
inclusion in
in PMFC
PHFC Data
Data Series.
Series.
Recommendation 4.
d.
Exchange
of
titles
and
languages
of
computer
e.
Recommendation
5. Exchanr,e of
Recommendation 5.
e.
programs.
programs.
Hake
Rake
Status
Status of PMFC Bulletin 77
Effects
in Washington's
Washington's Trawl
Trawl Regulations.
Regulations.
Effects of
of Changes
Changes in
Proposal
Proposal for
for New Projects
Parent Committee Meeting
lOth Annual Meeting of Technical
Technical Sub-Committee
10th
ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN
ADJOURNMENT
.
Appendix B-1
Appendix
B-i
:~
•• ~
"•'6~"·\ff'
'~l'.',...
0·."??.·",. (. ..~ ~- e~·
6
I
t.o~~,~ t1Y ~~~~· ...
. . ca. -
-
-
. ...
Cia
ga
•••
Ij.q
I
PETRALE SOLE
SPECIES
TAGGED PETRALE
SPECIES TAGGED
Sept. 1962
1962
DATE
-·
" ~s ~ ·~
c...
--~.., ~-··
._ b -~·~
I
5D
I
50 "·"~··
•
:
l·:•• ~••
~r ~rj~··
2373
NUMBER
NU M BE R
9: --~~lfG:
..·
o •••••
•0
<
''t5C ··~-=·~
'•-'· . .
'5C
-----cr. ca---- c····.•• •• AGt(V
..
·.......
--- ------.. ...
- - ..
5r
5 E ~::i
38 fath
DEPTH
~·
'i \ '/}\/
rJ.4?
••;> ,.
~.~
D"·:._•,
- __
W F...
. _.
58
....•.
""
30
3C
AREA
;,
2
C. -
'
-2
Ob
LW 0of C
FRB
AGENCY
-
~
___________________________
~···
~I IS I
5A
'-\ r: .• ·~ ••• .
5A •• ..t~··
...·
~
.:.
48
......
48
6rlv..
..
.
.....
BY YEAR
• ••
... •.•..• ·c. •.,••••
AREA
----AREAk26f
~
_r·····•
• •• ., :·.·
I
-Gr
3C/ ' .~f~:~:.;~!
~
==---. 'I·~:·.:4A 1
se:
5E 'i
I
'3B \:::·.: .. ~~4A
'38
3A.'
~ 3A-··~t~.$~·:·
sc
5CE
.
11
:
---·····
20
2D
53
••
i
., ..
----....*•••.. I
5AJ
.....
2C
I.
••••
RECOVERIES
- - • . • • c.-....:
:.. ••
·.• •
~.
~
10
BY
Cli
62 (63 64 65 66 67 68
11
• • ••
••••••
• •••.t •• • ••••
••
;.s..
.
~
••••
• •
1-
•
~·:
461
l
4Q2.24
ED
5!>
I.'•••
• •
58
1
1
SA
48
11
1
<=
5
11
S
S
11
2
"'
61 294
449
49 3322
33 22
'•
3B
7 11
a2 2
I
SA
7
i,
I
I S
!I
__
2
2
2
1
~=·
-_
----~···
2A
1'
I'
1
1
Ic~~--'-'-J
ii :rcT
!fTOT--:~l63[34~
..
,.~!·••
:•,
•:••
- .
---.....
TOTAL
TOTAL
594
..., ...
.....
""
\~.
~\
18
IB
•••
SS5
.5. 5
••••
.S
.._,.;-.
:~
1
I I A ~!
I
!in:<'r;j_..:_l~_2_l3 6!611616
IC
:~·
5_Si
••••
•..S
•••
•
I
S
5. .
(-:·'cuT
OFF
CUT OFF
32z l9E8
:.' DATE
AEr·3O1%8
:.•
DATEApr.
- ___ ..
11
5
1
5
El
TO.63j342 77T
s1[ 45[
4s!13't
z.it_i
3
-- ----
S
lA
'
••
•
C.
(S. • •
ç.
~
""
S..
•••
28
28
I
I
Lj
1
1
!!
2A
2A H'i
IC
2
11
10
U2£.10
2C r
2C'
•' -
- - - - •••
••• •
---~- ..
S.
1
__
__Ji
ii1Ei.
20
26
2
]~;.···
11
4A
4A1
3D
30
3C
•S
• v
.
55 5
:'
••••
S
Appendix B-2
'I;? I•
6
.
0.
S
6~'·•
• .'\ I,"'Jr c ~\S··•
S..
J f.; 0~" ~ j ~~ .....
c._
C-,9
l) SS
'.
..s
'::••J
;.'
~i~Nc\;)
~:~~
~(;::,:::.'1 ~ A- •.!•N···
'\\
~ '"b ~;.
y, ? •
,-tt_
COS
S-..?
PETRALE SOL.E
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED PETRALE
SOLE
SPECIES
0
----- c:a- ... ~:...&.·::.
:
OAT E
E
DAT
0 sO
.-.
50 ~~
.-;;s·r ~A~~
'1~1/h
. :. •.
::v,·:9
.
4_
...
153
NUMBER
e:,,
--- ~~··o~C~-::.•
.~~ 5 C ~a .i:~~.: ~
5~
Sept. 1963
SeEt·
1963
28 fath
28
DEPTH
Gf
'°'
\i.
5 C
rt
s)j:~ ••• •
-- ---~
30
3C
AREA
\ rt~\~~~ .5
.
~---- _";,:!.~ •••
AGENCY
ou.
C ' .: .. •.
Vc.S
.5
•.••••••
".,-....-: •••"'
~--~
··~··
•••~··
SA
5A ·-~~
0 ~t.w,
rT.. gK..
~
FRB of
of C
FBB
C
...······.
B
53
5
--------.. ...
..!!:.:::.~·
3
.. ,. ....... ..4 B
.
.
.
~ •
.'
•• ....
•••
.
.
..
..
...
~--------------------~3
COVZRIES BY YEAR
• ....
• • :• .
....
1
t..
- -
~
'c'. '- ,.. •
--.-
1
RECOVERIES
BY
• .. J
•
• ••••
~. ""'
~
••
•
iJj. ''• •'
•
. S
...
•
•
j.:. 4 B
v~ •••: ••'
::
•
~.
YEAR
• •••
.
.
. . S
tS.
-~-~·:·
•. . . . . , , .
r<RS./-~. 63 64 65 66 67 68
~I 25 1 • .,. • "v
••
.
::.
~-;:::;"'~··=:r-::;=::;=={:::::=F;;,=:;;F-=F==I==l
·r 25
"• :: .~j:•:•
.5...
A Ajo5t6668
.1\
__TE
r-G .
5E
5
=
·o
·
fjifcC
~"-f---'r-~-1---+--1--11--i--t---l
E
__
sc lj
-
c:::n
-.J~
5!3
II
5A
J.!
~8
.
-
11
I
--.--- ....fe:··. .
----- ...
.
11
.; :
..
•••
·.~
••••
1.5.5
I..
•• •
I.
••
•••
12 5
66125
!:
~~·
I....
28
2B
22
.! ••
A.
,S·.
1GUT OFF
----~:::.CUT
OFF
e
-- __ .. u·
- .4. S..
1
3
sftd
t:. DATE
~··
:~·
2A
IIC
c
1
20
---_
[I
2s ~
I2r
i2A1
' IC
H_idE1
J.~· TOTAL
I'.'
TOTAL
April 3O/
Apri l 30/EB
37
37
:·'•••
..••••
I..
•:_S5SI
••••
5
..
r1.
1::.
t...
i
IB
(B
!
..li!'••
,•
-~·
.•••
, ...
.....
'. . I
--f!•·
o\\•
~
I B !.J
___H
LIA
:tAll
S
___ ,··!·\.
1S
S
S
:'rL1I2
I
.,
.
I..
3B
2A
'r
.... .
.
-
I..
3 0 ~~
[30H
• 2C
-"~""•'
•••
.,:
..4A
4
~38
··::.
··:;;.~j~:
/3rk.
_r
- - - - • •••. --~••
3A
'
·
. ~••~· ·-~·
3A
I
- - - -J1!!•·••••••
• ••
2D
2
0
••
_I..•
4A
4 A Jl
3C
,1. ..
,'S.
~ . -~~~=-~:~>
S..
2C
!
rl
1
S
i
I
1
TO?4 [7118191211
a'..'
. .
S S
IA
lA
IM
••
·~·
Appendix B-3
B-3
Appendix
IlI
'j
G
6
SPECIES TAGGED
SPECIES
TAGGEDPETRALE
PETRALE SOLE
SOLE
Sept. 1964
DAT
E
DATE
.
2500
NUMBER
r
3442 fath
34-42
fath
DEPTH
5E
C.'Io
,.
5C
-
-
3C
3C
AREA
:1
AGENCY FRB of C
...
.SeS
1
.5
5A
-- -- _\
ECOVERES BY
I
.
.
,..: . :
YEAR
I; 4
':,;:. 48
k
I
/
I
é ::
5E
,4A
S
.a
-
5C
C)
.:.
2D
5
-
: :.'
5A
S..
2C
43
.
S..
- -
4A
JL
1
5
g_::
S
2
28
S
S..
CUT OFF
-_--~::
OFF
- - - - '
I •• CUT
Apr. 30,1968
2A
r:.~·
DATE
Apr.
30,1968
.
DATE
S.
-- --·
c l:·.
- - -
IL
-
I
S.
ii
1
~:~·'S
S..
I
----
I
TOTAL
TOTAL
:•,
172
172
....
......•
., ...
: ••
•:
5t
••••
~ S..
l::
•
.1'
5..
•••
~\:
•• •
•• • •
2A
lB
IB
.;-.
.._ ~
TL
::
Ilol
\\•
-__ ,··:·\..
*
5
1
C
5
_
-
IIA
A
'.: .
••
S
-.·..
Appendix B-4
Appendix
6
"
'I.S.
··~e·i~.~
~~~­
Se
S
"l~ -~~~i~,
_
--- --~·.J_
~~
•
-~~~!:/
-
DATE
S.
S
5D • ., f!i'.·~- . .50
~t
5C
3145
__________
NUMBER
a.. i.:...
,~~?
"'!i~:t
c4Y
5E "'i ~~--,v.!i:·;,
.
.'
petrale Sole
Petrale
Sole
May, 1967
SPECIES TAGGED
SPECIES
TAGGED
15-69 fms
fms
DEPTH
5,
~·~··~·~:.
t
3B
__________
AREA
5
----- -----' .......
....'.'
---------... ..':.*S.....'':. :.·:•·
5B
5B
• ~::.
I CS
WSDF
AGENcY
____
AGENCY _H_s_n_F
·- ~-·:,..
.-......l
5A ·~
.
~.-.il.t..·~·it
.-. I.: • I A
:-'~·;...5,
.
:. 4 B
:··.
••• ~:-:.
------..,
..
..
···:· ....
33D
0
:.;f•
··::•••
'
..
6~·
-....·• ."· r't''e..
AREA_
""=lrt=t=]l.t==+=f;;:+~~*=!=:l::J -- --
r
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES
&DEA
6"
BY
BY
YEAR
YEAR
S
••:• S•
S
• • •.
S.
••
•• '
V
S....
3C 1 ,-·~~··
• ~!;.
~'S
~·
.'
35f:
....
(jt:·4A
35 "'.he·:.:.::
B....
.,:::'.
.;::._
·-~~,. 4A
..._.:.,S•••
.,'P'\3A
·"J:
1 3A
~
~·
.....
S.
... ...
SE
5E
----20-- IS
50
51D
56
sc
----20
K·=·::··
••
..
2C
----- •••..5.·.
58
SA
5*
48
4B
.,
! ...
~•••
.5
••
....
•
S
••••s
S
4A
4A
It•
55
30
3D
3C
1
38
2C 15
20
-
2210
10
-
•••
...
!$.·.
j~·S
~
28
2B
-- --.,.j·:. CUT
-___ ..
2A
2A
IIC
C
----
2C
2C
28
2*
2A
ic
Is
18
lB
IC
I 8
OFF
OFF
14/30/68
DATE
::• DATE 4/30/68
.
Total 56
-::.
\!·.
.......·:··
•••
~! •
~-,
55
t..
•r-·
lp.~·.
S. S
., ...
'-\'
S
•
#• Ss.
.S
~
IA
lA
UNKN
:
I.
S
66
3A
3A
:
~\·
___!\~~:-.•.'t..
'.5*
4 4
14
14
IOTA
TOTAl 26
26 30
S.
5.
S
lA
IA -
v. .
Appendix B-5
B-5
6.
6
:,
-~·i:.,.q
·...
S.
a
I S
r.~
~PJ
:.;-·1
"
ii ~ t~l' ~
petreJe Sc
Sole
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED Pet.rplp
SPECIES
May,
1967
May,
DATE
-- ---~·J-~ ~~:/
'
A,
I.
1
I
,L_ 5D,
50,~~·.
~-~?
286
NUMBER
S.
a
~t.:a:.
S
''
v ----~~··~;~···
' ...i".
.
5E ~· ~--,v.~·:-·
5E
5C
5C
25-55 fms
DEPTH
3A
3A
_____________
___________
AREA
.. ....... ....
------ --·
'
S..
-----
.
t~···
SI
~::.•_:.
58
5 B
WSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
AGENCY
~~t'•
..: .':.
....t:.·.::l;
5A -l.,... r.....·~::::l
••. •.•
•
______
1 S
:.:.
4 8
• ···~~-·
I l ,_ 48
•
• •••
I1'
________________________________________
'20
•••
:-.
3D " ··:·
. S.
S..
. .....-~
-
.-..... .....
....
~
~
~
RECOVERIES
BV
RCOVERIESBL
AREA_
YEAR
R_
-
AREA 67 68
r~
k=1r=t==~=+==+=~~F=~=4=='==*~
""6
~
5,
S
Is •
~···
'
----
••
~~··
'2c
3C
~
5 E
SE
. .......
•.:. S: 5I
-~
..
" .ls5
. •....~:
~Y
S. I
,,.·~~
~··
,
.a
B ·:.::::~~
..........."-~:·4A
.4A
-20--:
~~~~::;;.:·
2D
..
----·.~~·
2C
2Cs....••••••,•
,_ ____
2B ;s:·
28
....
---J::.
a
-~
SD
sc
5 C
-
8
-
58
I
•;,•..-,;S
. .
'
r..• ••• c..
SA
5A
4B
48
r-• •
.
55•
••
.
4 A
4A
1. .
I
30
SC
3C
SB 4 1i
38
2I 19
3 A 24
3A
-a-&
-
2
2CC
11
2B
28
2A
IC
lB
IB
1
IA
lA
UNK'N
I
es.
•••
~.
S.
S
•
-
- -
- -
-- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - -
IOTA 28 22
TOTAl
I
CUT OFF
OFFL/3o/68
4 30 68
'S
/ 1
~=·
DATE
-..
c n·
.
'
.
---2A
~~1
IIc
~~·
Total
to ••
50
••
•:••
:..
••••
• •
•
.;·
~!.
(-•
t.
IB
lB
··••..,?.S
:....•
a. S
••
~;~
S.
___ ,,
t\•
'SI
5I
S
I..
I..
I..
Se S
IA
lA
·:·:.
S.
Appendix B-6
B-6
-
6
-~ •• IIJ~ "'...
•i~.. ~~r:
•. .., ii~·. 'J
~ ..:-~ ~
p.
., r\f
S
------·• ..so.~:-::.
,] ··..
etra1e Sole
Sole
SPECIES
TAGGED fetra.le
SPECIES TAGGED
Sept., 1967
DATE
S.
-~q~
..
vt''5C
~~:.,;,..
."'"
~-
5E
5E
·-··
•
-----
~
''!~
5C
58
5B
fms
18-55 fms
DEPTH
S
I.
0
3B
__________
AREA
••• •• •
.5
•• •
-------------~ F:···... .. .
-
1,143
1,1143
NUMBER
S...
.
S
•••
~··',. AGENCY
WSDF
WSDF
5,55
• ••
.S
....:~~~·
5A.·~ .~•• ....
5A
----- -.,. 1·-;·
• ....•.. •'<.jj_:•..•'.
•••:•..44BB
•....0:.
••••
30
3D
..
:. . .......
-- : ..:S
S
'I
~~·::
_
•
S
..
~
S
.
S
S.'
•
S
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
AREA
AREA1671681
67 68
6
SE
-U.
sc I..
5D
58
I
I
I
YEAR
I
I
I
----c
: •••
. S.
.., S
•S..'•
~-···.
S.
••
••
• •r .'
•••
~
S
. "
S
...
~
'...
.......
I
-~J~!~~~·4A
-- .,.
:c; •.. 4A
.,; .•••
----······
20
K
S.
_.-;
3C
5
.
S
,...
S
•.s'
••
S
-·-- -- ., ...
2 D
••
S
IS
•••
'.5
SA
48
2C
2C
4A
S..
'"~··
.:.:•
••••5
I..
••
••
.:.
•••
••
•
-----....
.
S
30
EIIUU
3C
I..•
••
28
(•
iS·.
:..CUT
.
----.A·::.
2A
':··
S.
...
12
38
3A
9
4 7
OFF
CUT OFt/30/68
/30/68
DATE
-- -- .. r..··
---- .·'..
\:~·
~~
(!)
t~·
IIC
C
Total 141
Total
41
SIS.
5
••
:.'
•:
••••
• •• •
'S
2C
28
•
S.,.,
- 555
2A
iur
'U..
IC
1a
1
IB
IB
......5...
~~.
S.'
ii.
~,
~·
•••
.,_
#• •. •.
S
'S
~
ot\•
S..
5 5
S
lA
S.
1
UNK N 2 6
I
TOTAl 18[23
TOTAI[18
23
5•
•S.
•
.
---IAS .
S.
.
- - lA
'
S
S. 5
~·-··
B-7
Appendix B-7
6.
S
.5
.
.e
Petrale Sole
SPECIES TAGGED
DATE
'
5D,
a
5C
fms
180-188 fms
DEPTH
1
U
893
NUMBER
'.
5E
Jan. 1968
SI,
3D
______
3D
AREA
--- • ··:,.
'
-------'·· ...... .
.
------ . ... ...
%
S
•••
~-----
58B
5
5A
•••• AGENCY
• ••
•••., •••• ~~
~
••• •I S•
·~:
:.:.
• .44B
B
•• •• ••,.••••••S il!ll.•
• ••
SS
•••
•
••
I.
S..S.
':10
• ••• ;~ •••
SI.
3
S
RECOVERIES BY
BY
RECOVERIES
YEAR
ARE•
68
______
rk=~=~iF~F=9F=9F=~~~~=4~4==*~
66
5E
SE
.
~ LG.J
~JJ
- - ••
:-_:••••
•::. •
•
.
'S
*'•
S.• '•
.~ ·•
.•
_ ~:•:•
-s
,~·;:··
..... ..!;.
,
·:·..:~
..~.
S.
V
• •
..
4A
_,_2a_ ;;~··=~~c;· l:4A
3C
.
__
50
-
sc
5C
-
58
58
-
5A
48
46
4A
4
A
30
3C
38
3A
2D
20
2 C
2C
28
2*
2A
WSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
~··
22
- -
----
-
lB
IB lA
IA UNK'N
UNKN 77
I
____IIOTA 99
TOTAl
,
-
i!''
•••
- -20-~·=·::··
2D
••
2C
2C
..
.,: • ••
p.~;·
••...
,•
----- ...
S 55
••••
·~·
•••
It•
555
2B
28
__
IC
. •
·:·.
....a...
3AA
3
-----
- - -
.. .
..
:
;s.::
-- --J:::.CUTOFF
.. CUT OFF11j30/68
-- ----..·:·
2A
IIC
C
----
':.•
DATE
..
DATE 4/30/68
::'
Total 9
·~~·
Total 9
~.·
...•••
.....
:·'
S5,
•:'S
a_S.'
fS
c,.
_SS
IlB
B
~-~·•.
•••
,._.
• •
.._,....
5
-55
___
-
p S.,
.,~
t\•
S.
!~\
S.
5,
~~·:.
::.
I. U
lA
IA -
Appendix B-8
S.
S.
6
S
55
6.
Petra1e
Petrale Sole
Sole
April,
1968
April, 1968
TAGGED
SPECIES TAGGED
SPECIES
DATE
S.
$
5D,
'.
10,122
NUMBER
:.
S.
'p S
5C
5A
.1
5.:..
t. . S
S
:. 48
5
AREA..
5..
SBYR
5D
SC
sc
58
5A
48
4 A
4A
3D
30
3C
38
3A
20
2 C
2C
2B
28
ic
ICi
lB
1a
s.
S
S
= =
I
'.
.p ::.
,
/38 ''
:4A
---.-.-:'.
3A
2D
2C
S
a.
S. e
S
S..
28
---2A
2A
•
:.hcuT
• CUT
OFF
L/3o/68
4/30/68
• DATE
No Summary
NoSunimary
- -
- - - -
IC
..
:..
-
-
-
S..
- - - - ------
I
lAA
UNK,N
___1---TOTAl
e.:
3C
2D_
2A
3D
e
S
- = =
5E
SE
YEAR
WSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
'.
'.
,:.
-------,
BY
3C
3C
__________
AREA
5B
RECOVERIES
180-240
fms
l8o2o fms
DEPTH
5E
'S.
18
lB
S. S
.5
lit.
S
..
S.
S
S. 5
IA
B-9
Appendix B-9
• •11.1':;.
.ile ·:.
,..
'l-~~~-~ ~.01:~ ~~i:z~
6
'a
. S
SPECIES
TAOOED Petrale Sole
SPECIES TAGGED
OAT
E
February 1960
1960
DAT E
~ . vv
;--,.
IS'
- - • • - -I .P- -.,~
...
.. "': ~ t:_~:./
t
~-~so. -~~·
5,026
NUMBER
~. w~~ ·.·~.
'i~.,
f).~ .... ~i~;.,
5E.:j
'f ----':~·~:·
...
.. .. ..:.•;.·...................
------ ---.';;
170-200 fathoms
fathoms
DEPTH
5E
S
5,
5C
-----
58
o...r...,e..,2...o;:.n,_ _ __
AGENCY ....flregpn
,.,
.,.4"
.•.•.
. 'S a
S
2-B
AREA
••
a.
-~S'S
~::: t:...:
.. ~4·~·~
5A ._.....
~\. ~ ~
-------..., .!.•
··~· o o o
.
a
-~
..
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
•••
YEAR
AREA
60 61 62 63 64 6!666k7k8
66 67 68 I
AREAI6O!61162163t641
ll=:;i:=i~·~~=t==~*--*-~F==t==-4==='1
8
--- c
66
-
ivaaauumu
S.
.·.•
S.
.ft
r ••••
••
S...
~
~,5
S
,,.·:-;-:~
, Z:.... ,~··
,(3
a S
U
.
- - - - - ••• •i!!.. :'
~
l· ••••••
.
~·" •••
lr.
••
S.
.,
.
5I .
222
-- -t--- - - ~~··
••••
.
••
2C
2C
75
::~:
...
S.'.
•••
S
rxiuuaaauuuu
3C
-'D
5
1
5 11
3
ivaaiiuiuuu
20
3A
mmmuu
8
9
3
1
27 21 18 7
10~ 30 46 14
1
J 1 .
4
] 2
mmuauuauu
in mrnnnuuui
iii
2A
1
2
IC
1
4
18
'
5S
'-a.
•".
a .•
4A
2c
28
••• '
·::.
.
S..
68
EJINIIUUIIRI
38
...
• ••
:'
•
38 ·~::::~-~~~=·4A
4A
___
:
••• •_.,.
3A
---....
0
22D
'
19
19
sc
5A
48
.•o••o• 448B
. .J • • •
....
::
.
~-'..
''
C
SE
5D
......:..
••
30
3D
A
•
9
3
uaauauuuuu
lA
UNK 1N 4
[201
20~
1-•
--~···
L/\
9 ..
•:•
28
~~:·
2BS
(~·"cur
CUT OFF
'S.
OFF
a
---~····
3 2A
~~·
DATE May
.'
DATE
.
S.
---~~·
11
17
-
l:·.
5
IIC
C
--~
Se
~·'
•:••
..
S.
:..
••• •
••••
Ct•
I'
r•.,"'\
St.•
5
~
I B
18
..
.....
1••1 •
.#•,•...•
a.
S
.
·~
,t,:
5 S
•••
•••
••
....
• •
•••
··:5•••
..5,
• •
S.
1 2
2
TOTAilSS
78 ~00 126'
26 .1. 44.. 4I 3t 11111
'roirAI[155178
---IA
lA
a. *
S
a
'.
a.
--••
S
••••-V
15.
15. 1l9fiR
Appendix B-1O
B-10
f•"
.••
.. ··j~·
'.: ~r
•G c..': r.. tT
(/:.:
;: •
" ' • • ••
6
---
I
-
It
)
<...• •'')
,·•-;_,
r]oJ.c
Pc truJ c So].r
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED Pet:rj]e
SPECIES
Nov. -Dec. 1360
1960
Nov-Dec.
DATE
"l.;:
__~~·~
.. _ ·.·:0·"·
........
50
I
"-;i[.
§1A1
'
5E
.
-~
..
•
I
..
DATE
'""·v.
{;)~=· •
I
. . ·":ff)
,..
----~~
•
? 2 318
2,3/8
NUMBER
~·-.
~ ·'r• ·~•e
I
\i5 5Cc
f+ •
•
L.\•"tt
,, o~····
<'..'· •
~:: tf:~;~
fms
165-210 fms
DEPTH
(
18
lB
AREA
ARE
A
.
-------5A --··• ....-· ...·,..
------ · - r ' 44 a
33D
0 r,::-;.
J:.~:.,.......
:-.
.
.
.
- ----- ... ... ....... .,..
1::
\ ,,:~~ ;-.•A!
-- ~-----U
·?.·•
$''
----o~:
.. ••••a AGENCY
5
B
58
cJ ·~-'···
( •••••
r. ~ • ••
. .• .• .
----- __..1?
~·•••• ••••
C.F.&G.
C.F.&G.
'..
I
~!~·q··
··~~!
•.• ...
"")I
••t '••
e
~r· ~~ ~....::.t;··
~·~I)
.- • •
\ $Q.). - A.
• •~·
: .
--
RECOVERIES
BY
RECOVERIES
______
_...
SE
5D
___
- - -- -- ----
5
SA
4B
4 A
4A
3D
30
-
--
3C
-
=:==__i==
------
20
2
2CC
--
2
B
2B
2A
-
IClB
I B
-
--
528183112
3 l 1 2
5 28 18
IA--
I A
UNI('N
WIK'N
-a
IITOTA~ 5 28 18
[-
- - - - -.
3
1
l'i-'
,.1
22
(
...
·~
••
·..
-----rr······
----- ........,.
.····,··~
~
-----~ •:•
··•
• •~
••••••••
3A
34
2
D
20
·.-..:..·
~: • • •
~&:_
.,~.
1.
•••
1:..
2C
- -
-----
.....••••.•••
••• ••
,..
....
--.J ::.• CUT
~
---IC
IC
----
OFF
May 67
31May67
DATE 31
j.:.
·:.•
:~·
' ~!·
••
.•••••••••'
. S.
••••
••••
t-
'it•
..•••••
.
• •
tlo!,\~.
18
~·
@il
• •
~,~
.. \ .
~·=·
•••••
- --- -
58
...
••••
~
--
- -- ----
~ ~'
•••
.. .. ....
, 0. ~)-=··
, .·:··
.....
'38 ·..•
·
...
,10.·
•••• 1.
• 4A
•••
···)':1!\1
-
- _
- 2A
3B
' · ~·
• :=>.'
I
28
2B
3C
3A
~
~
YEAR
6( 61 62 63)64
63 64 65
65 66
AREA
AREAL61
66
5 C
5C
5B
59
•
0~··
IA
lA
•••
•••
•• •
......
•••
•••• •
~··
Appendix B-li
B-11
"•'(..~::S
(:f,···)-~:-.
"$: ('j:.'S'
.
.;r-~~:~" r=.:u:: •
~~~·~·~·~'3
.~,,~
· I ' M'~::J.
.... ,'-··
66
\
..
(,. ...
- - - - ' i - --o('··~::~. _,
--
50
I
~
If(/.
.
·~·;):Y.
~-··
~ ~...: ·.·\.
5E
?,870
2,370
NUMBER
.r~ ,.·.~rt
5 E .. : .,._. ~~-.Jc.~:·.·
\J
lB
AREA
f ·.~/ ;··~
\
-----~-----L.~·
o~·;:._•.
\
30-65 fms
DEPTH
,., •••~,/.. ~
r;oTh
JuJ.-1\ug
. .lCJGIJ.
Jul..
-J\urj.
.1964
DATE
IJ,i,
•.
.. .
,,o~.,~~~··.
5
c
5C ..;:: (~·r:-: ••.,
•.•/j•
Pir]
SPECIES
SPECIES TAOOED
TAGGED
.,••••
B
5B
5
..
C.P.&G.
c
AOENCY
AGENCY
.F.&G.
"("'')...
l"'e•.__....,...~e ·~"•
5A
5 A··~,.,"'"I..·
.-:-/;:
. ..."' ......
. n::.
•'•"
...
,
... • c. ••• • • •
5
- ._..:
·l~ : .."
- - - - - - - - - - ::J,""':') : ••
.•· :
••
••
••
--~---
•'
·.~ ~.._,,,
.......
o
.....
,., ~··
4 a
B
=.f~·~f\oi~-:ii=·
4
w: •••
: . ' ':.11· .•
-
l
Q.r
~ 0 1f•.:f· '-~ <::."f(:•••
AREA 64 65 66 67 68
I
··--- ~~·:
i~~:·~ :~~:.
4th=1=1==1=
"'=~=rt==*=t==t=¥=4==F~~*='=='
REVB !
1-
YEAR
BY
RECOVERIES
• .,., 0
••
~~ h~
... , ::·:
1--f--+--t-_....---t--J ~ .
1 .,~·,:·::·. • ...c~ ~··· l'
66
-
-
5
5 E
E
a...-.-:--tt--t-~f-1--1--+-~-+---1
-
·s5D
--n
1
\
c
(
58
58
------
SA
5
48
20
33
2C
2
-~
1
1
28 .
B
II B
2
2
l1
- - - - - ----l1
55
4
______I
OFF
):;.•
DATE 3lMayl968
31 May l968
a DATE
:~·
t.s.
~:.
....
:·'
•:
.. .
.... .
• •••
• •••
f.':,• •
\
\:.
•• • •
...
•••••
•.,.
•••
-
S S 5
p,n
' 11
lA
U~~I('N 27 44 37
2A
2A
4 44
~35
l
?35 312
312137
B7 111 l11
ucN 27 44
.: •
----<::.. CUT
---
l
l1
28
2B
l8 IC
(ii)IC
1
•• •
t··.
~­
_. ___ ..
2C:i
I C
IC
.
.
..
....
...•.
~---I
I
11l
l
~
r• • •
20
2D
~~
~-- - - 1:'-::. ' 2 2C
j::~·
••••
I
1
3A
2A
... .
·-····
~-· .
6
lI
- - - ----1
l
l11
l
.,.••
_ _ _ _ ._ • : •
33A
sc
4A
30
3D
3C
3B
38
. I.--~· .,_~jl
_.. ~38 ..•.•• -~--)I•• 4A
~
••·:·..
• ·.rJ... • •
3
- -3A
- - i.
~··· •••
IIIII
-
- 8
. -
TOTALI[369iE33j]25fj
I
:.:-='-1
•••
<\\•
••••
•••••
•••
•••
• • •
806
---____ - -
.
['I58
lA
........
.
...·:.·
S. 5
•••
AppeDidix
C-1
Appendix C-i
5
S
6
S.
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED
SPECIES
S
S.
5D,
Sept. 614
Sept.
64
DATE
DAT E
.
S
English Sole
Sole
English
S
5E
30-110
30-110
DEPTH
SS
S.
:'
5C
1,888
i,888
NUMBER
LlA
4A
AREA
.l
5B4
,s
-
t:..:.
5A
e.:
.s
.1.
S
RECOVERIES BY
6E6768
AREA14
=
.
S.
=
=
..
..,..
3C
/
/
2D
-
?
5A
48
- -- -
2C
4A 9710C95222
.1
5S
ao
3D
28
3C
•
• CUT OFF
3B
38
3A
3 A
2A
--
l1
4/30/68
DATE 14/30/68
' • DATE
1406
Total 4o6
%.
IC
IC
20
--.5,
555
-
-
IC
IA
lA
..'
.
:
.
sc
5 C
IlB
B
S.
:44
.
3Ai ....
5D
2C
2 C
2B
28
2A
:
S
SE
5E
58
sa
A
3D
YEAR
WSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
s
is.
lB
18
e
p
-
-
5,5
'S
- 3(179
-
UNK'N28
TOTAl 2'
30
II
.5..
S.
S. 5
2
IA
Appendix C-2
S
6
English Sole
SPECIES TAGGED
Oct. 6L
DATE
___________
- - - - - - S
1,559
NUMBER ___________
35-50
DEPTH
I.'
___________
AREA
.
- - - -
-
- - - - - - - -
OR
..
r
:.
- -
RECOVERIES BY
AREA6LII65166I67I68I
3D
YEAR
I
F
WSDF
AGENCY
a
.5
1
S.
I
j.
5E
5D
- - - ..: .,.
58
- - - -.- . .
20 I
.. :. ----..
k.
5A
48
41
J
2Cj
3 7 l l
80 20 ii
29 8o
4A
3D
ao
SC
ac
I
2B'
I'GUT OFF
___.4
•
1 22
2A
3.
A
aA
J::
I.
- - j i,..
--
a38a
f'.:
3
• CUT OFF
•
. 4/30/68
t:.' DATE
DATE ________
2 C
2C
228
2*
2A
- --
-
Total
Total
1
-
Ic
IG
PB
1a
I-..,
4,.
IB
lB
T. S
IA
UNK'N81121462
I
- - - - --- - - -
IOIAI4rJ
0
50212
/
•
IC
.a4
I
- - '4:::.
-S.
IA
162
Appendix C-3
0
'I :
I
6
S
S.
I.
I
E;i
5E
,
.S.
.'
t
•
•' •S
'
•t.~::.
'
~
- -
·~
.. S
•' • •
:::it....
~!!~•• ::
. • •
• • •,
S
r---:R:E:c=o~V::E=R=I~E~S~B,..Y--Y-E_A_R-~
33D
0
R_
RECOVERIES _BL
S
4
5E
50
SD
-
5C
S
.
'• 'il
:"-. •••S•• 4• •••••• •c1l.!
I •••
.;. • ••
•:'.
•
:
8
'•.;0°:.
f• •~~ ~.·,:•••
5,50• '!:' ~~· ••
•.:.
. S S
.
•'5
,_:·:~
~J..:~..
S. S
--·
SE
1SDF
~vSDF
5 S
"'I
- -~• r,
•••
:
AREA±6E 6768
AREA
67 68
6
3B
3B
___________
AGENCY
AGENCY
SSS
t::.··.
.S
~
Li.556 fms
fms
45-56
AREA
--------- ... "··
r:!:\
6,044
6,o'
DEPTH
?
II
5 B
58
5A
5A
Oct - Nov/66
Nov/66
Oct
NUMBER
'
5C
English
English Sole
Sole
SPECIES
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED
OAT
DAT E
E
S
~~
S..
,1.·:{~~ ~!·
3C
2
2
.
,
__/'3B
·:.:·!:~.:3 ~~=·4A
3e:':.
4A
- - - - .,.
·~.,.~·
~
·;.·.
•
•
5::.:.
.
(T3A
7 3A
S
, •• ,:. 1•,
202' -~ ~K·=··.·::·
5 C
58
Li
58
6A
5A
22
4&
4B
4
ii
4A
1
1
3D
3C = 4 =
3B ~o
So l38c
38 80
38
8o
3A
3
A
·~- -
1
2
2 'S
([~
2C
=
-
2A
5
1
=
=
2B
28
--
.
•
•••
S
•
,J~:·
....
s CUT
S
'S
• ---~~·:•• CUT OFF
OFF
. DATE
2A
•••
4/30/68
DATE 1/3O/68
I
~-
--- 'l~·.
;~·
IC
Total
---- .......
13
13
11
I
920
5q
:•,
••••
•_se
•••
11
•
~!.
8855
Iic
C
IlB
B
•••
_
E
2ll
2
:!~:
1----- 0....
2 lllr:; 58
2C
2B
28
- • ro!·~••~• •
-
lA
I A
UNK'N 25
UNK'N
6i
25 91
91 61
I
TOTAI 89 61.4 217
lB
IB
-
r-·
to.
5S 5
ii":•.••• •
o
~.;:...·
.0
~
~~,.
Ste
___ ,_···~...
OS
S.
..
S
S. S
IA
lA
:.•
•••
S. S
Appendix C-4
C-4
6
English Sole
Sole
TAGGED English
SPECIES TAGGED
SPECIES
-
May, 1967
1967
May,
DATE
iss
1,835
1,835
NUMBER
18-69 fms
18-69
fms
_____________
DIPTH
DEPTH
3B
3B
___________
AREA
"
-
F
-
WSDF
AGENCY
0
tf !.a
S
5A..
4B
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
AREAI 671681
1
1
1
YEAR
1
1
3D
. S
1
3C
/
28
S
S
B
a S
A
2 D
I
4A
S
.
..
I
S.
--
a,
I
48
EI
EU
4A
2C..s.
.
Sa
- ..
2
ao
ac
a
S..
28
S
•
• CUT OFF
I/3o/68
• DATE
.,'
DATE 4/30/68
a.
Total
Total
S.
5 Ic
'
a S
.5
UI..
izir
a..
.,S
a
18
IB
55
5
.' te.
a
iriuu
55
S..
5
5S
a. a
IA a
$
431
1431
AppeJ?.dix
C-5
Appendix C-5
~ e';...·£'"~~~€'1
trrc.·c
''- 1·~·"•••
, ••• ••
6
• 1•"'
I ••
i;~·
~·
-----. -
•••
••
çc.i
!tJji::
~~··~;l,.\:
l''
~::
'l..
-
i
a
~ 'I~··
(.~:·1/f:·:
•
''(.~~· r~··
YEAR
--
5A
.i.. ....
\ If. / ;· ·!
0~·:~··
AOENCY
(
r ·) ·• •.5•
)•·.:
:
·'l.···!.·~·~·
·-~~~
•• t•'••
·.·... ""L.:""<
t:rJ.'-.
.... •••
' )•
~
-l • - ""''-". •
4
S S Qi':4 . 4
~S ~~~~~:.·:·
~
••• J
•••••
•
:\
,,
I
........
48
B
-
'
...
30 -.. •.:. ..
_.. _.~
.·.~··
..
••• ·=~)·t;)
"'
1:·..
-~·
· ~:
' •••
.,
....
..AD
••
::,.
r,,":•'.
' ·:~:~:.~·;t·~~v:.:
\"38
..• . •. •
'
• •··.c;·
· •·4A
- - - - - - ·••:.
·:·.
• • • ••
•• •
..:.
----1······
20
~:·.
2D
3A
----- .....·
-----l···•..·.
~~
.
.~,
1::....
.::
t-:~·
2C
2C
•••
..i.
4
A
4A
••
RURU
30
3C
38
3A
•••
r~::: OFF
--2A
---c::
.. CUT OFF31 May
May 68
l~;.• DATE 31
68
28
2A .. ::·
____
IC
----
20
2C
2B
IC
I B 256 31
DATE
:\t.
•
••
I.e.
:·'
••••
.....•• •
•••
L
..
..•• ••
••••
., ...
\- ·
S
,\~~.
~\
C
2A
lA
.
•..
:-.:. c:·~·.:::
~
3C
11111111111
5B
58
I
.. - - -
ARE A 6.7 68
6
5 C
sc
1B
AREA
C.F.&G.
.;,.-: . . AGENCY __________
58
5B "·"-\·.···
.....
-------·-·
. 5A
-·r..•···...
•••·• .
5A
AREA167681T
5D
6-47
6-17
DEPTH
_ _ -~~-C1s',
- -
BY
1,612
.1,
2
NU M B E R
.NUMBER
............ ~\>· L\~·::.
~·0~ . ....
5
~=:){··)~
•••·~•
'I l' ••••(t•
::.
\
RECOVERIES
nr
. S S
•
!'5C
c
a:..Jt.---·-----v
-----5E
5E
SE
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED f.nqli~;h So.le
SPECIES
Feb.-Mar.
Feb. -Mr. 1qG7
DATE
,U1 I
·:·:"/,',·:·.
--,-('}~· ..
• -so
5D tx}.:£
't:
l~.)\f.
~ u,,. •••
~ .. \S
•••
• . SS.
lB
18
tr .
5_
287
287
1
UNI~'N
__
}\
..
- -3~:•:.
I'...
I...
a,...
'I..
L. S
S.
I
1
lA
IA_______
Appendix C-6
1{'
·., ,, . ..
.
'j.\
(.'(;·:
...c'
·.·.•
t.y
"•'(,f":X_
'G:~.....:. ,(;I.(j'.
•••
6
~· "1
: .
.) l,.
'·•"[.
'J
-
-
-
-
-
1...'.
-•
S
-
(~···
•
·'
t
,
,_• •
So.le
SoTh
.....
Jin.
-Pel,. JDGR
]961
Jan.-Feb.
ThAT E
DATE
NUMDER
DEPTH
5_)
..
~-!
••••
j .''••v.
50 e \..";):• •'
~1 t:;),(fi,\•,•\
,.~:·
55 E ... .-.- ~~:jf,·.-:: .
I
EngJi;h
EngJi~•h
OED
SPECIES TAG
TAGGED
SPECIES
lh •..Y;
• ' .•.'•
~~l
3,3G9
6-52
6-52
lB
AREA
·~"5C ~·~~;f::::.;;t.
\ Ji·i
C.F.&G.
----... · ~··
-----~
,~:
..
•. AGENCY
58
"-\•
.•.
......
56
----------~· ) ~ ..~ ..·.·.
sA
.~··~·r
.
,..
.. ......
54
... . 48
--a-- ~r':..
\..~... ~l;,c»~M··
~' ;!-!
a a - a
C.F.&G.
~. \
.
r;) ••••••
- a
. ,
··~
•.•
;:_:'.
~
· ...;.' ,
- - - - - - ~·
RECOVERIES
RE COVERES BY
SE
5D
SD
__
#·r.. •
~(\._•• •
......••
.
,
- - - - "" • • . •
......·.:)"'. .., . ~.·.·•.......
-..........
...,... fr....
3C ,/'4.:?
- --"~~£t·~;~··:~:·4A
-----' .,',
3A
·:· • •
34
~...... ·.
a
--20-- ;;·:···.
- 2D
a.
~&_
-----1
••
...
J:··
2C
.:..
•• •
•• •
·.::·
"\ ~~:.'
••• •
r•• ••
p•~t,
•
·~·
":::::::::.
'=\:,.~.
"~
- - -
58
•••
~
-
5 C
sc
i
~···
• •
3
3 0
D
YEAR
,
ARE A68
AREAI68
66
lB
AR E A
5 C
5A
SA
4B
49
..
r'. ,
.
----- ...
I..
'S
•
•••
sJu. .
4A
~
~···
3D
30
3C
•••••
28
r..'·
OFF
CUT OFF
a a a. ' •• CUT
----~~:
31
c;.'
24 a ~··
D TE 31
2A
DATE
S..
a
------:~·
'·h
....
3B_________
39
3A
'
2
IC
- --
2D
20
2C
213
2B
IC
I C
1
..
..
.,•••••
.. •
). \.
i..
•• •
-'C..
113
-~
•••
.
..·..
•••
•••
.
• • ••
a. ··:.•
(§ -t"A- ..•••
•••••
\\•
1. •.
. S
I
%% S.
3
Aqua
..,.·---·
...
'C.a..
I
2
2
.
.
S...
umt'N
1
.
••
•••••••'
•••
••• •
~·
1S S
ill
B U]13
II B
IIA1
A
IL..
~:.
1t.!.,
1.~· •
'
2A
TOT
May 68
S.
(S S
. ..
...
lna
..
5
S. S
S.
I 1A,.
Appendix D-1
D-1
6
.
.. ·.·,...
·~··~
~L,
;..
-~
S
r ,_
S
~'--'
. _so.
,
Dover Sole
OED D:>ver
SPECIES TAO
TAGGED
SPECIES
=
I'
------~--~A'::.
V
-~~
S
DATE
•·.•
~-
5E'
5E
~·
ij
------- - -
-
---58
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
I
IARE
AREA
6
0S
.5
•••
I.
AGENCY
~::.
e
• ••,
I
':.,
.
...a •• ••• • •
I.
• ••
• •'4B
------"11~
iii.•
4 • ••~.
'(~····
. .. 4 B
5'
~
-:•
:··
51
30
:·
•.•
YEAR
~·.o:~
3D
I
J
----
:
.
..
:. . .••....
.
J...•. '
3C
3C
,1-·::·.
··~ ...~:...
.
,/'3e ··.,.....
·.·. G(:4A
~~~~ 4A
I
~··· ·.
------
SD
5D
sc
5C
58
3A
3 A
.~·
·ft~~=
.
..
•••
~~·••• ~·.
1
•
S
.
--2o--l_
----------)S:•.
2DS
S
5A
4B
48
2C
2 C
- - - - -
4A
S.
••
•S.S. •S •
•••
5,5
~~,.
•••
.:~·
.
••••
S. S
•• •
S.
.":•
1-
S
.
S..
•••
30
3C
....
----~::
28
2BS
-- -- .
38
38
- -2A
3A
20
IIC
C
----
2C
_ _ _
28
2B
2A
IC
IB
IB
lB
IB
-.
WSDF
.. .....
•
FAREA
.....
...
.....
a
S
·:·,~~
..
'38 '.
5E
SE
-.
3C
3C
AREA
••
••••••
--------~ ·~·~1:
5A
5A
fms
l8O.21O fms
180-240
DE PT H
DEPTH
0
5C
963
963
NUMBER
.. ••••
~9:.~-·\i~·
t
,... .
~
April, 1968
1968
April,
S.. S
•• CUT OFF li./30/68
4/30/68
':·· DATE
"ATE
.
~:·
t~·
••
5
••
.,
No Summary
..
'
•:••
••••
55S
•••
•
1'
~-'.
4%
(\•
t..
1-
.
~~~·.\.
• •S
"ya..
~
lA
IA
UNK'N
JNK'Pl
I
TOT
TOTAl
.5
~\·
S
••
.5
---IA
lA
-
'
S..
S
.-•
S
·-..·
.5:..
S S
•••
Appendix
D-2
Appendix D-2
·~·::.' ~~~l\t~.
_I i_S' S
~-~ ~~.OJ~i1,
-
66
. . ...
------·.
~r. ~- ~ VW' ~••
.
·"~
.SO.
.:·••
L
SPECIES
TAO OED Dover
SPECIES TAGGED
Daxc:t Sal~
Ap;ti 1 1955
April
DATE
-
-
~-~
'a .
4
----
58
'..
~~·:.
S
SS
•••••
-~f:·
il ••• ,..
.......
. . ..• ...U
3D
30
:-..
·::.
5
·.'·:·
•••• .··~
...
.
gs -,. .-. ? ,,....1.·.·....
.
5A ·~ ·!ib:::,.• ·
____S
••• •.•
5 .UU
------~ ,.....
••• 4
48
B
.
~
S S
~
••
S..
.
••• • ••
:.
YEAR
..
S..'
••
•
S
AREA
AREA! 55
57 158
55 56 157
58 L59! 601
60 61!
61 62!
62 631
63
7
5E
•
I
tt
S
c
6
..;..,..
S.
·~
,1.
...
, B·:~·-~~~-··
S....
-,.'3
~B
·:.·:·:.
l~4A
4 A
,
I...
S.
S
.
1
-L)
..:--•:••.••
~< ..
3A
42
~~···· ••
1
L
5D
uuuusuau
5C
----- --U
58
S
---
.
-~ .·....
2D4\::
20~~
n_O ••
1 • •:
,23~ ___
17j
S
S
.
....
S
.5
----~!~
5S •
•••
.5
•••
6A
4B
-
2C
1-----....
U .0
••••
See
••
•
""
S
S.
S
4A
3B
Ore
go~
Oregon
AOENCY
AGENCY
S
5Am.
ao
ac
2-D
~-D
AREA
--------~ ~~···
::
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
150-180 fathoms
fathoms
150-180
DEPTH
15
5C
-~---
2.406
NUMBER
~~v. ~~!t·
,.•......,.
5E
5E j~r
~
S..
~:
A\:·
S
. 2e
2B
ruauuuum - 2A --~·
----,:!•
1 4
1
1
1
3A 17 10 6 3
20 13 51 t73 ~8
2C
1
1
8
8 3
1 1 2
9 12 12
21
El
UUUUIUU...
2A
___ _.·:
•• CUT
..
CUT OFF
OFF
196~
May 151
15, 196
t:.• DATE Ma~
•-
1
IIC
C
---
UUSUUUUUU
i
.saUuU
a
III
UUUURUUUU
IC
1
1
.
.5
~t·'S
••
':·'
••
.....
••••
• •
S_el,
-
••
~(::
•••
S.,.
\.
S.
•
.,.
#• S..
. ...
1...
IB
IB
US
~r-
riRaUUUUUUU
lA
UNK'N 2
4
1
1
1
1
S..
•S
S.
••
55
..
55,•
---IAU..
___
TOTAl{34
34
j69
~9
43
~11 143
~,19
119 .
991 33j10114116
10 14 16
""
is
55
~-'.
lA
'
•
.5 S
S. 5
••...._.•
Appendix D-3
D-3
Appendix
S
6
a
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED Dover Sole
SPECIES
-
- -
1961
May 1961
DATE
S
4,321
4321
NUMBER
109-137 fathoms
DEPTH
5E%.5'
2-C
2C
AREA
I
.,
- -
- - - - -
AGENCY
0reon
Q:ts:e;Qn
.
5A5.
:.
f',t. .'
-
-
-
4B
':.
RECOVERIES BY
RECOVERIES
I
YEAR
I..
I
Ir
-
_tv
S.
.
Se
3C
I...
/..
SE
L1
uiuuaiuu
tI USUU.U.
4A
sumuuu
uuuiuiui
EIRUUUUUUU
ac
30
20
2C
21
2
5
5
12 76 67
(229
3
24
8
I.
77sç 1::,
a..
2C
.
- I.I
.
S..
7
-
2B
S
a,
,'.CUT OFF
2A
..
DATE May 15. 196
• DATE
1
1
IC
1
ammmuuuuu
El IUUi$..U.
ii uuuuunu
3
s..
...
20
___-
iiuuuuuuuu
as
aA
4 A
a;..
3 A
5C
6A
48
.
: .
50
58
.
1
S.
3
'-IS,
1
i
usu
UI
m UUUUU.UUU
2A
1
IC
I 8
lA
1
I
1
I,
S..,
lBS.
1'8
a.
l, S
I.
'-I
5,5
5
0
S. S
.S S
12183 [77
29 33[ 11
1 129!.
100
- - S.a.S.a
lA
IASI..•
Appendix
Appendix 13-4
D-4
V
5,.
S.
S.
6
S
e
'
Dover Sole
Sole
SPECIES
TAO OED Dover
SPECIES TAGGED
May 1961-May
1961-May D64
ll
May
DATE
0
.
S.
1
V
S
.5
5D,
5E
DEPTH
fathoms
50-400
50-400 fathoms
AREA
2-D
_______________
S
5C
5B
5
'
Q;me;gn
AOENCY flreo
AGENCY
S.. S
i
-
%S,
'P.
S
S
t. I S
5A.5:..
I
::48
S
S
AREA
61162 63
6
651 661
6768
5E
SD
3D
..
I
S
--
.
S
*
e
S
S..
.5 .
3C
-- - - - -
,
/
/ 38 .,.;..
.'
19101
5A
6A
48
4A
4 A
ao
30
ac
3C
38
-16
16
77 71 113 48 18 99
44
2 1
121
2C
2C
2B
28
2*
2A
_55
IC
lB
1
a
-- - - - -- - -
IA
lA
50
so
2D1:.
:.'.
2C
.:.
S..
2B
28
:.CUT OFF
_2A
_
IC
Ic
..
• DATE May 15. l96
.
1
- - -
I.
lB
18
5 5
S..
S..
S.
5
_____
-- - - - - - - - 6
S
S...
5%
' SI
.S
UNK'N2i2 -- -IOTA 7
4A
.
S.
sa
S.
.
3 A
5 C
3*
3A
2D
20
-
S...
5;.
.'
YEAR
2-P
.
t
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
9,013
9013
NUMBER
L16 35 21 DO 68
4
- - - - 5 5
IA
S
Appendix D-5
D-5
Appendix
•
6
·~·:;.
1:1 ~~·:. S
~~~ ·~iM \.:i'.
-4 ..... •
.::fP.\
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED
SPECIES
v
. .
- .i'
- DATE
:~- ~tJ·o-l(jll~~·:
•
• •••
NUMBER
) ..~1
~ ~::··~••
DEPTH
5E fir .... ,, •::-;..
..
't:' ..
. S
-- ---r_,__ -\::.
-
Dover
Qover Sole
Sole
jri1 1968
April
1968
1,168
~~~ ~~~
5Eto.tj
~
~·~·::•:.
\
.
---...
58
.... ______
..··:....·.·.
5C
.
.
-----
S
- ...
~
fathoms
40-45 fathoms
2-fl
2-n
AREA
AGENCY Oregon
\p"•
AGENCY
Oregon_
·t·~
~~··,.
I
·- ----
~
., t. S
Icj:
..
5A
~~~:~:,..
3M ..----~
r
-~ ~:vr~·~r·.SS
-------~{·.·
• •• •
RECOVERIES BY
BY
L RECOVERIES
AREA 68
IAREAI68!
e
I
I
I
YEAR
'20
1
•••
•••• 48
,f.
It : ••
··:·
~ ••••
·:·
••• ,
·::.
.
.
----'2c .... ...... .,.............
3C
~
,-'1·'1F=-:-~~r
..
·:·.... ..~~··
~'38 ·:·.
··: 4'
.~r.: 4A
t.
-----.,.
··~
'2A
•••
.....
.....
3A
~ ~····· ·.
- 20
rn-20-K·:·:::·
o-----· .
~
- - --S•
-·
-
~·.
•••• •
,.
S SA
*'
~
-
.
SE
._.
•
·,~·S
r::
~····
'~
:
~.
,
5D
~
- I. . I
SCi
58
-
6A
48
4A
-
-
c
2C
2
...
.:.:
••••
- .. J·,-' ~ •
,.:
------ ...
••• •
•••
S
I-•
30
!C
38 Iu
3A
20
2C
28
2A
2
~-.~.
t.j.·.
IIIIUUII.II/SCUT
28
28
- - --~: •• • CUT OFF
OFF
May 15
1 9
2AA t~~· DATE ~1ay
15, 1968
2
- l:·.
---- .....:·'
---~~·
1s
IC
••
- - -
e
I....
UI'
·~·
•••• S
Ns.
~
"ti-IS'
t,.
......,. ...
c-IS.',
r·.\~·
P_
IC
1a
liii
lA
UNK'Nil
I
TOTAl
101M 22
••
•••
_SS
IB
S
- •. • .•
~~
,,,.
___ }\..
~:~··
S
:
lA -
Appendix E-1
C•JO":f, ,., (t
"•c~·::.~~~t·
£be-··~ .
:.~
s
.,.
S
t ,•
,.,.
~·~ ·~···
••••
14.
- - - - - - - - -o- ....
~~50. ~~
. ·:.•
..
-.. ,
··~·
~
..
")·I~ •,•
PACIFIC COD
COD
SPECiES TAGGED
TAGGEDPACIFIC
SPECIES
May 1964
DATE
•
I
3654
3654
NUMBER
:·
~· ~rr.
~·
~··
•••••
\
6..
\
~·O~t·
•
1&55 ~~.... ~·
l:=)·\·
\:f.tf.(
.
- - -.b- -=-·· •••
5E
1242 fath
12-42
fath
DEPTH
'd
5D
50
ARE A
AREA
AGENCY
·-----o
_____ .. __ ..·:.....
-
F
FRB
of C
'
1 .: .. •.
AGENCY
Is
··~·.···
. ,yr..5
C:•• •••
~··· ..
:
5 BB
•
~
5A
RECOVERIES
BY
538 34:
k538
34
-.-1
sc
5C IL.
.
3
3~
~····
, ..1•:~:~~ IJ:-,
~
58
L
48
5A
3A'V:'•:•
•••".
•~~-·
:
LiIIIiiIi
4A
4 A
-
30
3D!
3C .I11
"'
38 tL__
33
.
SA
j
I
20
2D
2C
2B
2A_
2A
IC
-,
I B _.jI A r.:1 1
20
J.t• ••
•••
••••
••• •
•• •
••
S..
.~~
TO:A[~5f!4I 7;f
I
I
•••
l
....
(
ICUT
----~::
•• CUT OFF
OFF
30,196
:.
2A ~·
DATE Apr. 30,196
::· DATE
2A
~
___ ..
S
.. S.
IC
---lB
18
,.~!·••
'J.
IOTAL
lOTAL
~
1070
..
:·'
•:••
••••
••••
""
~-~.
~'L~·
•••
••
•••••
••,• •
. ...
:,~
l;~\·
-
••
\
4
1-
------s_:·
I
3L 3
I
75734I
·•• ••
.,• • •••
------r-:··
....
2C
- -- - - -
Iv P~~~·
.... i\. ·t~ 17 57
~·····
D.,
28
'
I
. (\
---------- .·..... ·.
11
88
.. ., ....·.·..,
'".
3c4jfr4A
,'38 ·.:·:·.:·.!J~:4A
11
34
,..
.
~ ••• 'tt
·• ~-·
3C
5E
SA)
.
............ ....
---- ..
AREA
64 65 66 67 68
AREAf64k5k6676a
6
.
•••: ·:.·. •
·:~·>'
•
• • v'"d'· • •••: •••
------.• ••••• • ~"".'
••• • 44B
B
• • D! ••••••
•••• •• •••
•
••
30
•. :. •• •.:·••·::.
•'
YEAR
I
- --- .
lA
'
••
•
•
••••••
Appendix E-2
E-2
tel
I
..
::.,\((
6
(
,_.s j
Q'1 'a.
PACIFIC COD
COD
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED PACIFIC
SPECIES
May 1965
DATE
2
-
k'. S
t\9S ,
-t 854 l-5D
fath
39-48 fath
DEPTH
5E
...
>
----•1
RECOVERIES BY
AREA15 166 167 1 681
2687
NUMBER
1
/
/5B- - -
D
1
AGENCY
ISl
.
3'
- - - - - -
1
FRB of C
S
/ :::
cli t:Y..
5A
YEAR
50
5D SW White Rk.
AREA
B
30
3D
----
s
.
I
55
I
v
s.
55
S
.14
')-.!_t_#I
6
r
3C
SE
so
711 131 1:;;
sc
c; 58
- -3A
- -
2
2D
•j
59
'.
..s:0?5.J
/ \s.
.1.L1I5
/
___ - - - . S
f.
- - - ES,
SA
48
l\
1
-
2C
-u.s.ulIR
4A
30
ac
I·
- - - -I..
••
•••
I...
28
2B
~ ..~.
~·.
J:.cUT OFF
----~:::.CUT
OFF
~~.
:
.
DATE
Apr.30,1968
2A
('
::•DATE Apr.30,1968
w RU.NSll. - ___ ..
U aRUIIB I c :•,
38
a., .
('%.
~t·
3A
20
2C
- - -
rnmaivaua
2A
IC
1
.'
I ,
.
•;•
\~.
. .·
~\:.
•••
IlB._'
B
-:• _.••
.,.~
16
lA
968
968
---- •::.·...... .
IC
2B
.
J.~. TOTAL
ttr·
;
U"!'
P ol' II\ N
14 2"'
.
___!\
.
-~~-:.
I
I. .s
2
1
a
1.
I'S..
V.
S. S
lA
-
Appendix E-3
5
··~r::.
~"R
~
~
·
· ~·
WC! i) t.~ ,a...'I
66
--••-
4ill\ ' I ~'CS.: ~
-
~ -~-.n
I
SPECIES
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGEDPacific
Pacific Cod
Cod
.fr:/
5D,
~.ASD.~~
~·~)~·7
:.·· ••
5
E
"'1~~·
.,..-:
rj':'
5E ~
,,,
5C
~ SC
~·::···,
a'
'a"
---5 B
.
S.
I
~
5 ~··
d
•V
S
\..
.:
S
!EX}~·:·
3
YEAR
2B
2a
2A
Ic
IC
S
Tal"~
.. : :
--~8~
3C
...• 'i~...a:..,
3C .~· a~~~
..
.....
4A
_ --'-~- ..,
-..,~
··~~·
,.·4A
':lA
·:•
•
••
,
....
3A
__
I
I...
1
--
18a
1
2261
81
2
11
11
-
I 8
lB
IA
IA
UNK'N 1 12 4
UNK'N1L2
IOTA
.
.,.
.
~
5 1
- 51
2C
2 C
:...
,'.s
ac
3C
3A
....
:
1
-
3B
B
S..:.
BY YEAR - --~~·{····~,
-BY
== = = == = = =
4A
4
A
30
3D
38
WSDF
.:~ •• tl'.
-\.·.~ ~
SE
5 E
6A
4B
4B
WS DF
AGENCY
~:·
sa
50-65 frns
___________
_5_o-_6_5_rm_s_ _
44A
AREA
ARE A __________
A
DEPTH
: ..
5D
50
sc
5C
860
___________
860
..., AGENCY ------SB
t·;·:.
--------·
..:. .....•...........
.:A
5A ....... ....,.......
------, ~···. · g. "
~:·:·
! · 4B
..
.. ·: :··••••
-----
66
Dec. 1';166
NUMBER
NUMBER
.
t
____ RECOVERIES
AREA::c:
v:IES
AREA S6 677 66
Dec. 1966
DAT E
OAT
'a
-
.
a
.
i!• •• . •
2 D
--2o-K·····=··
..
----- ...
.,
~:::·
.....s•
I
••••
'S.
••
•
2C
-
-
..
S
- - • •.' •
"'
2B
28
s_::
2A
2A
t:..'•
-------~·:•• CUT
CUT
- - --•\.''•
OFF
OFF
DATE '30/6b
4/30/68
DATE
i~·.
IIC
C
---- ·.·.•....·
Total
Total
119
119
~'
:.'
•:
S.'
I'
~i•
t.
~~.·
S. S
··
..•••
:I-.
•
., '••
18
lB
Ia
~
,t\•
S. S
¶1
, •••S.
~
S..
S..
.
4 lO'
7
io1'
;c
---_
lA
IA
a.
S.
S.,
••
,
~...•.
Appendix E-4
:f
l~· ~ ~,;·~
-- - - --• J~· ~ ~
-~.~~ ;,·
6
6
S
SPECIES
TAGGED Pacific
PacificCod
Cod
SPECIES TAGGED
Jan. 1967
DATE
-
-
'I
511
~p-q
l!:/
~- ~5Dti·~·.
~-~
~ .~·.·~.
5E"
5E ~: ~--
:i: •
3,368
3,368
NUMBER
•• ~.:.
14-60
fms
i-6o fms
____________
DEPTH
~·~llilf.5,i
v 5=-~-·
-~~;...
• t::.•;.
4A
AREA
___________
I'S
- - - -
----SB S
51------ -
HSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
AGENCY
I..
--------· . ...
-
S.
\...,_t.
RECOVERIES
RECOVERIES BY
AREA 67 68
1AREAI67I681
YEAR
-=;er-i.....t=-4-==+-=t==t=::+==l=:=l==!==l
r
SE
5E
5D
5C
5 C
68
-
5A
48
I
I
I
4B2
4A
3D
30
3C
ac
3B
a
a
aA
2CC
2
2B
28
2*
2A
IC
IlB
8
17 2
58'
9J
1
-
- --
IIA
A
1
UNK'NN6l4
40
UNK
64
- 4o
1
-
TOTAl
TOTAI67~
13~
S_S
.••:-...·:· ......
• ,..·..~~··:.
..
- -w- ..
SA
- - - - _.'
I
5
'
'20
~
_j
S... •
•.:.
• ••
---·
,.~;~~ ,s-
--
,....
,
~ J.• •• • ~;~·
·UI'J~..,.. 1a_p
~ ~·
3C · .·~·'tlfll .-.-:.
·" B ·::::~:
~t:·4A
. ··~'c;·l!t_•
- /- - ~,~
--'-~•!•"'
2A
3A - i!' • • ••
•
~·=·.·:··
2D
••
--2o--
-----
.
S
..
2C
.... •
2C
-.,----····••
.,••••
~~o::•
••••
•• •
I...
•• •
'~:·
h?.
28
R.·
I.CUTOFF
----~·!.CUT
OFF
- - - _..
.
4Lij3o/68
68
2
A t'.
-:: • DATE
2A
DATE /30/
- ~ ~ -a;!:.
---- ~··...
-
- -
Total
Total 810
810
t'
IC
- - -
lB
IB
5S..
•:
••••
• •••
tl•
r•,:il>\ •
....., ...
••
•••
•••
~
~,.
-__ ,_···~.....
U.S
S.
- - IA
lA
I.
••••
.-
Appendix E-5
6
"~}-:••,
S
S
------ -'-.....,.,.
so.
-~r"'~~ ~
•
~;..."29
S
-~ ~
SPECIES TAGGED
TAGGED Pacific
Pacific Cod
Cod
Mar-Apr.
Mar-Apr. 1967
DATE
::.
t:.!:/
. S.
I,
~·­
~_t !.~:~~-
5Eo'
5E
..... A!•n.:•
~!- ...... "N''-• ·:-;,
~·~
~
~
-----
5C
S.'
~\·•
~-·
.
S
4A
AREA
S.
•••
-----
15-L6 fms
15-46
____________
DEPTH
~·' . , I.
:.
SB
2,J-7L
2,474
NUMBER
___________
WSDF
T.TC"DF
~~~::.
S 'S
AGENCY _~_~"-· ----AGENCY
.,.lt:• •• 5
--------~
S.
..·.~: f:. S
5A .-~~~~:;:...
5A,.
.,.:
. ... ... ... ..
-----~·~·
~~..-:·;•~.·.
48B
••
• • 4
-~: ·:· :··
r--~:-:-:-~......- - - - - - - - - - '2 0
•• :. ~ ~ ••••
3D
RECOVERIES
BY
~
J#.
:-_. •
•::.
RECOVERIES BY
YEAR
L
:=r
• --.:II~Ct•
IAREAI6768f
::*p
AREA 6T 68
-- -·
~···
•
'
I
I
I
••••
rll=:=j=:i:;l~¥=t===+==+==t==+=~F=:F:=*==I
8
•••• .p ••••
~
. S
t
•.-· :
t
•
II,,
I
F
I
.rr~25i -=~
,r~ .~••:•;:~•• 11~·~
, 38 ·.:·•··: • : 4A
- - - - - -1- •:•
-~ il._
·;:.•;;-~.•.
5s
3A 1 :'
~~
3C
\"
•
J.
.. .
--2-o--
L1U
SE
50
.
sc
----2D
58
..
.,:·.··
..
.... •
:.'
~·=·::··
S.
S
.
_ _
SA
48
1
5
4A ~ 38
30
DIU
1
3A
1
----- ...
' .
••••
S
J.....:.
S..
,~
----···
IC..
:
...Gi•
----
2C
28
II
thU
IC
IB
IB
I B
....•••
S.
S..,
••••
S..
•
IS
,5%S
r•(-•
S.
~-~·.
•...
.,.•S•,
S1p
...... ...
55
~
In'
3E
I
TOTAl
TOTAIt • 1 7
79
-·
1,482
J.: •
.5
~·'
.SS
•:S..
It\•
lA
1,1.1.82
Total 1,561
c, •
2A
1
S
:,.CUT OFF
OFF
----...~~::.CUT
li./30/68
4/30/ 68
2A
"::•
DATE
..
DATE
_
IC
UNK N 26
S
P.~:
••
505
••
•
S..
•••
28
2B
EU
DI
38
2C
2 C
?
I,e
___ }\..
S.
SS
S.
S...
IA
-~••••
5S.
lA
S
Appendix E-6
:.e
I
6
Pacific Cod.
SPECIES
TAGGED Pacific
Cod
SPECIES TAGGED
May, 1967
DATE
I
I.
S
$
5D
222
222
__________
18-69 fms
18-69
fms
NUMBER
DEPTH
5E
SIlO
5C
---
S S
...
, te••
58
t.:·:.
~·· ,.
....
--~I.
-------.......·:.
..•
5A
------~.-;·
;,:•••
• ••.•..••• ......
• ••.48
.:.:f• . .:.•·..:•••
30
.
..•.
_
-----
•
II
AGENCY
AGENCY
HSDF
WSDF
5 B
"
~_,
~-.!l!.A!.
5 A ·~
S
'
.....--~--------------RECOVERIES BY YEAR
..
5.:
1
1
3B
3B
AREA
S
~.,.':!::.
.. '.
4 B
~
3D5I
RECOVERIES BY
R_
SIll S
~=--r-~~;r~r=~~~-,~~~~~--J
··~
AREA
6,
68
·
-.~
.........
! •.• \.. ' S.
AREA 6 6E
.,I
~9i=it=~==9F~~=+~+=~~~==~=L~
.
~···
.~·
'I.
6
'2
(i.)" ~. •' w'4"' ~.:~:
S
S
5AS
c
,s..
/' ,rr.·::·.
.'..•••·=··..
3C,,,
~ • 2'411'
-
SE
5E
·~ ~··
r,f;,-~8
,.~.
~;.: ,.
4A
4 A
-_
~:,~
.;
'2A
•••·.~~~·"
•
...
50
sc
5C
58
·.
..,3 A ~~····
- -20-K·=·::··
2 D
••
.
'S....
-----
- - - - - r:··
'l.~.
•
6A
4B
48
2C
2C
4A
LL
••••
S
•• •
-----·: .
I
33 1
3D
30
1 3
3C T
38 ~4 33
••••,•
S
-
•
S.
•••
28
2B
•S
,J. .... .:·.
:.'cuT
OFF
--2--.J~·:
.. CUT OFF
./3o/68
A
•• • DATE 4/30/68
-----
-
2A
3A
2D
20
2 C
2C
__
2B
28
2*
2A
.
DATE
:.
::•
ii•
Total
~=:
•:
:..
••••
••5•
---- ...
IC
IC
5.,
S
. ,.
~· '
r~..!\4'. •
tS
IC
IC
lB
18
-
-
IA
lA
UNK'N
6 6
UNK'N66
I
IOTA
TOTAl 24
2L 13
- - - - - - -
lB
18
••
IS
••fit.S
.
•\'.
# S..
·~~
"S
It\~
S S
___ ,_···~·.
It.
S.
?I.
:.S5
IA
lA
....
I
S.,
••••
37
Appendix E-7
E-7
S.
I.
66
S
b' S
--UISIUIl
'
S.
S
$
SPECIES
TAGGED Pacific
Pacific Cod
Cod
SPECIES TAGGED
Sept.,
DATE
Sept., 1967
DATE
'
5D.
....'.'
5E
235
NUMBER
18-62 fms
fms
DEPTH
S
S..
:.'
5C
33
3B
AREA
---- .. ........ .
--------·
- -·.·.··!1!1.:··.... .....• ..
------
S
•••
"
:..~··
,.~······
5
e8B
S
s
.., •.•••••
lily
5A
WSDF
WSDF
AGENCY
S
.11
_j
~~---~~~
5A:..
....
·~S
...
SI
------.., f:··· S •~~·
~~·.:.:.
• 44 BB
••:'
•• •••
••
• ••••
_______________________________________
3D
RECOVERIES
30
:.:!•
~~ •• :S..
•••
RECOVERIES BY
BY YEAR
EAR_
•.:. •
••••
AREA 67 68
- - -"01'2!s.
•.• •. st
'~
__
::.
r-=9i==i==9~9F==+==4==~~~~==~~==~
66
qp.••
• • ·fi ··~
:-••
3C
Jl.
-:•:.
3C
*:
'
'
S
.
--
55E
E
50
5D
.
•'
-
sc
5C
____-_---
t·.~i·~~~f.:·
.sS S
,'38.. •:·.··7~
/3B.....
'4A
- ____
,. ·~c;
".r.:4A
S
·:·.
•
3A
••~·i..:.
••••
• •
5
--20-. 's''
~·=·:::·
2 D
.,
t:::•
2BIA.
----- .......
------ ...
58
58
SA
5A
4B
46
2C
2C
S..
....
•
555
••••
s.
••
S
••
':
••
555
•••
4 A
4A
3D
30
3C
36
38
3*
3A
2D
20
2
2CC
2B
28
).···:·
.......
:.cJr
OFF
- - --.J:!..
CUT OFF
1./3o/68
2
A
':.
DATE
4/30/68
2A
. • DATE
-- -- .. ,::·:
:•,
---- ...
IIC
C
l~·.
Total
Total
:.'
•:
.5.t
••••
28
••••
.. . ...
tt•
2*
2A
IC
Ic
IlB
8
-
18
lB____
~·r-·
1..,
S. S
~·.
.,• \.•
.
S.
~
~ t\•
S S
..
lA
-
UNK•N
UNK'N
I
TOTAl
TOTAl 0
-__ }:.-...~:-:...
S..
S.:..
S. 5
0
lA
IA
-
0
Appendix E-8
-
-
- - -
.. -
a
Pacific Cod
SPECIES TAGGED
DATE
April, 1968
1,318
NUMBER
15-31
DEPTH
p
I.
__________
AREA
S
5
- - - --
WDF
AGENCY
S
- - - - -
5A
- - - - -
RECOVERIES
RECOVERiES BY
AREAI
YEAR
4
3D
- - - -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.':
3C
3C
,
58
---------
5A
SA
48
2C
2 C
4A
- - -
SE
SD
50
sc
5C
30
3C
38
!iA
20
2C
28
.11.- ____. ..
3A
20
28
- -2AIC
IC
- - -
2*
2A
IC
lB
1a
IA
lA
S
- - _ - - ..::.S
S.
., S
S I
SS
•
• CUT OFF
<.CUT
1i./30/68
4/30/68
:.• DATE ______
2BS
S.
No Summary
No
S.
S
S
I.
IB
IB
S. S
. .
5
S
S.
..
I E1i
- - -
'S.
S5S
.:.
S. S
IA
Appendix F-i
F-1
I>
6
0'~~~·. .......
.:..
~~·~61fd'•'
.r
°
..
9e ••
,
:..
~
•.•.•
1
o .,
~
•
1
~
LINGCOD
TAGGED LINGOOD
SPECIES TAGGED
~.
- - -- --- --I -- -- -o--~···
••••
••
V
\
t
I
50
II
~
.
5E
5E
\
55
DATE
....
~,Jj·h ·.·~.
~·~~):•
•• •
·
.....
~,a,v:;t.S.)
1
34-42 fath
DEPTH
I
5C
5C, ... ~·~
••••
~-
-----\;
2000
2000
NUMBER
--~·
3C
_________
AREA
~ \h&t'··
__
.5
;r;~···
- - _ - -,.c -,' - - a.
-,"'!;,.: .. ••
-
I
~·
~~
- - - -
AREA 64 1 65
67 68
651 66
66t 671
681
·-
6
r
g;i
3
•• •
i
i
SE
5D
. i .I
'' o.: •
• •
•:.·:.
• • • •~.
4 ...
•: ••' "' ••••••
V.
.....,...........
......
.
.:•.I.
-~-
S
..
It11.
~~
626b
2
~·.· 't~
b
·~-···
- •:•
I
58
1
4
2
2
.!·i
1
~
-~·.
3
:11u1a111.um.
4A
ac
1
1
- ----~
___
: .~~
3A
••• •
S
1
~~
...::.
iiauaumaua
iURIRU
2C
2B i
2A ~l
IC l
I 8 ~I
IC
~=·
~··cur
.'.CUT OFF
S
5.. 5
..
----
'
i1i*URUIUR
aiauuum
$EIEEiIIUU
IB
IB
IS.
E
~
~~A~45[
if{11
IA4st!t17
3( 4
-
4~ 8
Apr.30,1968
Apr.30,1968
_______
DATE
:~·
I.
~~·
lOTAL
TOTAL
J.~
S,•
767
:•,S.
..
S
•:••
••••
••• •
S.
tt..
~.~·
I St..
f-•
••S••S•'
5• S•S..
,•
'-S.'
~
...... ...
.
·~
S S
lot\•
S..
lA
3~
...
.S
••••
••.••.
- - - - - S.
•• •
S.
---~- ••
S..
•••
- - - -
20
3 51
S
• •.5• ••
- - St.
-.~~
:.
S..
•••
----~··
2A
•••
- ___
3
3A
u:Jtt•N
S .
.
28
28
8 ' 4
141 339 34
38
~ :.
- ... .... ·...
2D. S
--2o--~
----- .........
2C
1
.
55
49
3D
S
•,:•
..
••••
..
.~-~~~=
..•• ~,;-·•·.•
/ . • ••••
S
~&·1"
4
'38
\:::·.:·.~~4A
. S
'3B'
- - - - -
1
~
~
1.
3 A
sc
4B
• •:. •• •.:·••
YEAR
IU&---.-..St.,
.
....
33
RECOVERIES
FECOVER!ES BY
FRB Of
of CC
FRB
AGENCY
A G EN C Y
•••
S:a_··· ••
......:.·.
.:
. :
----~~~··!.
7
5A ..;~o
·~··
••~
. ••··~·•••:... 48
.L
.
-58
(6)58
6
--.
.
1-
Sept.
Seot. 1964
S
•
S..
5.
---- - IA
lA
'
•
55.•.I
S..
••
S..
55•
.
•••••
•