International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
The Categorization and Comparing Different
Multi-Agent Models for Conflict Detection and
Resolution in the Air Traffic Management
Md. Ivarahim Sakil1, Md. Imran2
1,2
Research Scholar, the University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
ABSTRACT
Having a reliable, safe and economical traffic management is crucial issue in aviation business. presently traffic density will
increase, so existing traffic management systems aren't ready to manage the huge capacities of traffic utterly. to unravel the
issues the aviation business targeted on a brand new conception known as Free flight. withal, the foremost vital challenge in
current traffic management and particularly in free flight methodology is conflict detection and backbone between completely
different aircrafts. thus far variety of ways are bestowed so as to alter traffic management victimization multi-agent systems
technology. However, there has been alittle discussion regarding the potency of those ways. Also, there has not been created a
comprehensive comparison of those ways. In this paper, we have a tendency to gift a transparent framework to categorization
and scrutiny completely different multi-agent models for conflict detection and backbone in traffic management. Then,
victimization this framework, we have a tendency to measure varied projected models. Our comparison framework relies on
characteristic such as: agent choice (the entity that elite as Agent), agent’s actions, agents’ interaction methodology within the
method of conflict detection and backbone, the strategy employed in agents’ implementation, variety of the multi-agent system
(pure multi-agent system or combined) conflict detection methodology, conflict resolution methodology, set up Dimensions,
Maneuvers, and management the multiple aircrafts conflict.
Keywords: Detection technique, multi-agent, air traffic management.
1. INTRODUCTION
Currently, aviation trade envisages with most basic and vital issues embody safety, dependability, delays (reduction
of delays in airspace and in airports), saving in fuel consumption, ability with unheralded things and conflict detection
and determination drawback. Among these issues the conflict detection and determination drawback is that the most
significant issue. This drawback imposes several losses, include: long delays in aircrafts’ flight, unskillfulness of
managing of traffic, high fuel consumption and plenty of different vital challenges.
Alternative approaches have planned for overcome these problems; that one among these ways is that the free flight
conception. Free flight implies that, pilots or different users of the traffic have additional freedom for choosing and
modifying their flight methods in airspace throughout flight time. The free flight conception changes this centralized
and command-control airspace system (between traffic controllers and pilots) to a distributed system that permits pilots
opt for their own flight methods additional economical and optimum, and set up for his or her flight with high
performance themselves. Free Flight, conjointly known as user most well-liked traffic trajectories, is associate
innovative conception designed to boost the security and potency of the National Airspace System (NAS). Despite
several benefits of this technique, free flight imposes some issues for traffic management system that the foremost
notable one is that the incidence of conflicts between totally different aircrafts’ flights.
Many researchers centered on conflict detection and determination drawback and planned varied ways to resolve this
drawback. one among the eminent ways is multi-agent technology. Agents square measure applicable tools for analyze,
implementation and development of complicated systems. the applying domains of agents square measure terribly wide
and their high performance in varied applications is inevitable. A multi-agent system involves variety of autonomous
and intelligent agents that these agents will work along so as to attain their goals. Use of multi-agent systems for
finding massive and sophisticated systems square measure one among the foremost eminent and economical solutions
for these issues. The airspace (air traffic) management system may conjointly suppose as a multi-agent system within
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 13
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
which totally different agents operating along so as to managing traffic in reliable, safe and economical method.
As we have a tendency to mentioned, since the conflict detection and determination is one among the elemental
challenges in safe, economical and optimum traffic management, during this paper, we offer a general summary of the
present multiagent-based models for conflict detection and determination drawback in traffic. In our analysis, firstly,
we have a tendency to studied {the totally different|the various} planned models having different performance
criterions. Then, we have a tendency to created an exact comparison of various models summarized during a table. To
do so, we want to perform a particular structure and framework for comparison totally different models.
In order to possess associate correct comparison, we have a tendency to thought of applicable options for comparison
varied sorts of planned models and choose the simplest model supported the desired options. Finally, we have a
tendency to summarized our ends up in table two and showed the benefits and drawbacks of every model.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: in Section two and three we have a tendency to make a case for the
traffic management system and multi-agent systems severally. In Section four we have a tendency to make a case for
the conflict detection and determination method. In Section five and vi, we have a tendency to gift severally an outline
of categorization of planned models for traffic management and a few characteristics of agents that has got to have in
traffic management system. Then, in Section seven, we have a tendency to make a case for varied options that used for
comparison traffic management models supported agents. In Section eight, we have a tendency to gift some vital
remarks regarding planned conflict detection and determination models. Finally, Section nine makes some conclusion.
2. AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
In this paper, we have a tendency to outline the traffic as: “aircraft operational within the air or on associate airfield
surface, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas” [2], conjointly we have a tendency to use the definition of traffic
management as: “A service operated by applicable authority to push the safe, orderly, and prompt flow of air traffic”
[2]. traffic management could be a terribly complicated, dynamic and strict drawback that involves multiple controls
and varied degree of coarseness [1]. Currently, the airspace system has high flight capacity; thus, the management of
this huge volume of flights is incredibly difficult.
In general, the goal of traffic management systems would be, firstly, providing safety in traffic which suggests
keeping aircrafts separate (i.e. to watch the minimum reliable and allowable distance between aircrafts), secondly,
growing up the performance and potency of the system, and conjointly increasing the speed of flights, police
investigation and breakdown conflicts and reducing period of time (minimum delay).
3. MULTI AGENT SYSTEM
In this paper we have a tendency to use the definition of associate agent as: “an agent could be a ADPS that's capable
of autonomous and freelance actions in some setting, so as to attain its delegated goals” [3]. we are able to say the most
purpose regarding agents is that they have the power of autonomy. associate agent analyses inputs from its setting, then
makes choices per its inputs, and use those choices to require actions in its setting. The multi-agent system contains
variety of agents, that these agents will communicate, collaborate, and contend with each other so as to attain their
goals [3].
Agents square measure applicable tools for implementation and development of complicated systems. the applying
domains of agents square measure terribly wide and their high performance in varied applications is inevitable. Agents
have several applications in education, military environments, networking, business method management, industrial,
info recovery and management, simulation of social and political relations and plenty of different areas [3].
Using of multi-agent systems for finding massive and sophisticated issues square measure one among the foremost
eminent and economical solutions. In some cases victimisation of multi-agent systems (e.g. distributed drawback
finding systems) square measure the simplest and well-known method for finding a spread of human processes. In
general, one may say that a multi-agent system is employed in domains in which:
 Data, management and experience is distributed (e.g. within the geographic scope, the matter is distributed).
 Centralized management is not possible or impractical.
 Subsystems of an outsized system need interacting with one another in additional versatile manner [3].
The airspace (air traffic) management system may conjointly suppose as a multi-agent system within which totally
different agents operating along so as to managing traffic in reliable, safe and economical method.
4. CONFLICT DETECTION AND DETERMINATION METHOD
Here, we have a tendency to 1st make a case for the that means of the conflict drawback in traffic. during this paper,
the conflict is outlined as: "conflict is that the event within which 2 or quite 2 aircrafts expertise a loss of minimum
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 14
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
separation from every other” [4]; so the chance of collisions between aircrafts is increase. In different words, conflicts
happen once the space between aircrafts violates normal shaping what's thought of undesirable [4]. These conflicts
should be prevented throughout a quick and correct process; otherwise, traffic management can cope with problem and
conjointly risk of any craft collision will increase. for instance, if horizontal minimum reliable distance between
aircrafts is a smaller amount that 5nmi then there exists the chance of conflict (collision) between aircrafts. In fact, for
every craft a protected zone has been appointed that may be thought of as a secure space. Therefore, the aim is to stop
of incoming different crafts within the aircraft protected zone. However, deciding vary of the protected zone for every
craft depends on dynamical circumstances. Obviously, if the radius of the protected zone are going to be massive for
every craft, then the chance of conflicts is reduced, however this state can cause slow aircrafts’ traffic. Thus, applicable
choice of the radius (range) of the protected zone is a crucial issue. However, the conflict detection method for every
vary of protected zone is sort of identical [4]. conjointly during this paper, conflict detection method is outlined as “the
method of deciding once conflict - conflict between aircrafts- can occur” [4], and conflict resolution method is taken
into account as: “specifying what action and the way ought to be to resolve conflicts” [4]. In general, we have a
tendency to summarize the method of conflict detection and determination in Figure. 1.
Figure 1: Conflict detection and resolution
5. CATEGORIZATION OF PROJECTED MODELS FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
In this section, we have a tendency to reason existing models for traffic management into 2 models: classic Models
and Models supported agents.
5.1Classic Models
The problem of traffic management was the eye of the many researchers, and lots of classical ways for this drawback
are projected up to now. varied models like Lagrangian models [5]-[7], Eulerian models [6] and different mathematical
models; that wide were used and a number of other researchers have projected varied solutions [6], [8]
5.2 Traffic management supported Agents
Agent primarily based ways square measure a natural tool to alter traffic management. As we have a tendency to
mentioned, consistent with the capabilities of multi-agent systems in finding advanced, dynamic and enormous issues, a
number of analysisers paid attention to research on traffic by exploitation multi-agent systems. a number of these ways
square measure enforced and presently square measure used. associate example of those systems is OASIS (the system
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 15
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
that's presently undergoing evaluations at state capital airfield situated in Australia). the precise functions of OASIS is
helping to traffic controllers in manage the aircraft’s flying flow within the airfield surroundings [9].
The given agent-based ways, involve a group of intelligent and autonomous agents that the aim of those agents is to
optimize and to attain some specific goals through learning or negotiation with every others [1]. These systems applied
completely different|completely different} agents with different methods. a number of these agents used theory of games
in conflict resolution method, some others used learning methods, and a few others used specific protocols and methods
for this purpose.
Here, the necessary issue is that autonomous agents conceive to perform their actions properly, improve system
performance and eventually propose a reliable answer for conflict detection and determination drawback.
6. COMMON OPTIONS OF AGENTS IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Here, we have a tendency to take into account a number of generic options for Agents and multi-agent system in
traffic management method. These options square measure as follows:
A Multi-agent system may be a dynamic, non-deterministic and complex system which incorporates variety of
agents.
 No agent has good information of the complete system (i.e. doesn’t have complete data from all of traffic
environment).
 Agents in multi-agent system are often optimum agents. this implies agents not solely tries to supply a suitable
flight arrange that covers the system’s restrictions in terms of the system performance, accuracy and speed,
however additionally offer optimum price for system.
 An agent ought to perform an affordable action and not perform the activity that imposes various prices for the
system.
 If associate agent in multi-agent system behaves coordinated with different agents, the expected system’s utility
would be maximized and can do things additional quickly [3].
 An agent shouldn't be tricking different agents and it's assumed that agents square measure honest.
 All agents in multi-agent system ought to be intelligence, autonomous and freelance.
7. COMPARE OF AGENT-BASED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTS MODELS
Various criterions are often used for analyzing, comparison, and classification of existing models for traffic
management. Here, we have a tendency to attempt to opt for the well-known and best characteristics.
Kuchar and rule [4] have used a series of benchmarks to match the classical given models. Their study was supported
additional classical and mathematical ways and has paid little attention to distributed computing ways and multi-agent
systems technology. Of course, during this paper, we have a tendency to used a number of given criterions in Kuchar
and rule paper [4] to match projected traffic management models. Moreover, in following sections, we have a tendency
to projected another novel criterions supported multi-agent systems.
7.1 Agent choice (The Entity hand-picked as Agent)
The proper choice of associate entity as associate agent and additionally crucial the kind of activities that agent will
perform, square measure important in traffic management system that the performance of the model is especially
depends on. associate entity ought to be chosen as associate agent that gives the best performance for the system and
additionally the best accuracy and speed in activity operations (e.g. in aircrafts’ congestion space, once conflict
resolution method associate agent ought to perform the activities that impose the minimum delay for every aircraft). As
is shown in Table one, several of projected models have hand-picked associate craft as associate agent and a few others
hand-picked {a fixed|a hard associated fast|a set} location as an agent. The necessary issue in agent choice is that ,
firstly, it ought to be have all options that associate agent should be have in multi-agent system, secondly, the chosen
agent should be ready to perform best action within the least attainable time with highest accuracy below any
circumstances.
7.2 Action choice (Selection of Agent’s Actions)
The correct choice of the kind of activities that associate agent ought to perform in system is incredibly necessary.
The actions that agents ought to be performed, should be thought of within the manner that the best performance and
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 16
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
potency of activity these actions to the system. choice of agents’ actions have an on the spot relationship with the entity
hand-picked as agent and these 2 problems square measure powerfully depends along.
7.3 Agents’ Interaction
Type of interaction between agents in multi-agent system is incredibly necessary issue. projected models supported
multi-agent systems for traffic management that use negotiation techniques square measure additional economical than
solutions within which agents use non-intractable method or ancient approaches [10], [11]. for instance, sure if agents
talk terms with one another in conflicts resolution method, firstly, the quantity of controller employment are often
reduced by every agent, and if agents square measure coordinated with one another, they'll distribute the required tasks
- for instance during a specific space - to resolve conflicts and perform things quicker and additional correct. If agents
work alone they need to perform all things alone and clearly it might not be the most effective answer and it's attainable
that their goals violate different agents’ goals. The second advantage of the employment interactive method or
negotiation strategy between agents is that this methodology ensures conflict resolution method wouldn't be too long or
unreliable and collisions between aircrafts wouldn't be intense. It ought to be noted that will be negotiated primarily
based models (i.e. models within which agents talk terms with {each other|one associateother} in activity their
activities) can't be guarantee an agreement between agents in acceptable time interval; and this reflects the very fact
that these agents within the worst case can act as non-agreement.
7.4 The methods of Agents (Mechanisms utilized by Agents)
The existing models used totally different methods and mechanisms to resolve conflicts. the most methods include:
theory of games [4], [16], management methods, prioritization mechanism, teamwork, coordination [14] and different
specific methods [4]. The necessary issue within the use theory of games strategy is that these methods within the worst
conditions add the worst case state of affairs [12], [13]; though these methods will offer an affordable answer, the
answer isn't optimum. exploitation associate optimum and comprehensive strategy has vital impact on the economical
management of traffic.
7.5 Arrange Dimensions
This feature describes the state data that is employed in projected model: horizontal arrange, vertical arrange or
combination of them (both vertical and horizontal plans). Most of the projected models cowl each horizontal and
vertical plans [4]. additionally the models that use one in all these ways have the flexibility to increase if attainable, and
might support different dimensions which is able to vary counting on the projected model. Here, one model which will
be utilized in many ways (dimensions is given. The model are going to be ready to additional accurately and as shortly
as attainable find and resolve the conflicts if it's a full read of the traffic surroundings. Obviously, if the model has not
associate acceptable read of the traffic surroundings, wouldn't be ready to find and resolve conflicts as properly,
therefore, which will cause irreparable harm to the system.
7.6 Conflict Detection methodology
Proposed models for finding conflicts drawback in traffic management supported multi-agent systems use totally
different principles for conflict detection. a number of these models use a similar criterion for conflict detection
between aircrafts and their variations square measure simply within the answer of those conflicts. for instance, most of
the projected models used a minimum reliable and safe distance criterion for conflict detection. therefore once the gap
between 2 aircrafts is under a threshold (usually use a predefined reliable distance), then there's a risk of conflicts.
Consequently, it needs warnings incline to the operators or agents responsible of resolution conflicts; or if associate
agent that is detected a conflict had capability of resolve conflicts can conceive to resolve the conflicts. another models,
exploitation special ways, attempt to stop incidence of conflicts (methods for hindrance of conflicts) and not use a
certain criterion for conflict detection.
Here exploitation this feature, we have a tendency to compared the projected models. however we have a tendency to
largely centered on the employment of a threshold for conflict detection consistent with the criterion that used. Most of
the models use a really straightforward criterion to conflict detection et al. have benefited from a far additional
advanced criterion for this purpose [1], [4]. In general, one can't be claimed that of those ways have higher accuracy; it
depends on the kind of the projected model and needed methods for resolution conflicts. Perhaps, it's attainable that
employing a straightforward principle had the next potency and accuracy than employing a advanced one.
7.7 Conflict Resolution
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 17
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
Proposed models used totally different ways for finding conflict in part. Some models are used classical ways to
resolve conflicts and are mapped the normal ways that onto actions that agents will perform. Some others used new and
innovative ways that each of those ways are attempting to boost traffic management. many completely
different|completely different} categorizations for conflict resolution models are adopted that Kuchar and rule
additionally used a similar classification and are examined different models. This categorization includes: predefined
conflict resolution methodology, improvement methodology, automatic and innovative methodology, manual
methodology and no resolution methodology. Of course, different classifications are often supplementary to the current
comparative set. Here we have a tendency to used this provided classification; then compared and divided totally
different models supported these characteristics.
7.7.1 Predefined Resolution
In predefined resolution methodology, throughout system style (e.g. in agent style stage) a series of predefined
procedures and logical rules square measure embedded in agents and autonomous agents. once system is managing a
conflict these predefined commands are going to be accustomed solve that conflict.
7.7.2 Improvement methodology
In improvement methodology, agents tries to optimize system performance (or in different words, cut back system
costs) by adopting a series of optimum methods. It appears this criterion as a comparative feature between totally
different projected models is useful; as a result of prices reduction and increasing the system potency has been a
significant and necessary drawback. In conflict resolution method by exploitation improvement mode, autonomous
agents are attempting to use a series of price functions associated environmental conditions (that square measure
perceived through the sensors) and by exploitation an improvement methodology solve the conflicts. during this case,
every autonomous agent are going to be adopted associate optimum answer.
7.7.3 No Resolution methodology
In this methodology, there's not a certain output to avoid conflicts. Some models find conflicts however don't counsel
a mechanism for resolution this drawback. In fact, such models maybe square measure given solely to find of conflicts
(collisions) and aren't thought of a mechanism for resolution conflicts.
7.7.4 Manual Conflict Resolution methodology
In this case, agents aren't used for conflict detection; instead, users square measure allowed to supply a mechanism to
find and take action to resolve the conflicts by use feedbacks that receive from the system. This methodology
additionally has comparatively high flexibility, however it must correct and proper policies.
7.7.5 Combination methodology
Some models use a mix of different conflict resolution ways to resolve conflicts. for instance, one in all the models is
also in some cases use predefined actions, then encounter with bound things and take the improvement procedure.
7.8 Resolution Maneuvers
This feature argues that in resolution of conflicts what answer or in different words, what kind of maneuver are
going to be accustomed resolve conflicts. To summarize, a number of the rules include: speed amendment (decrease or
increase of aircrafts’ speed), dynamical the angles (horizontal maneuver), amendment and change altitude (vertical
maneuvers) and switch maneuver [4]. a number of the models are used only 1 of those criterions to resolve collisions et
al. has used a mix of those criterions. In some models, activity these maneuvers at the same time is possible; whereas
another models don't use this maneuver at the same time. Obviously, if in our model we have a tendency to use
additional maneuvering dimensions, additional economical answer are going to be achieved. The horizontal and
vertical maneuvers square measure shown below.
Figure 2: Horizontal maneuver [13]
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Figure 3: Vertical maneuver [13]
Page 18
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
7.9 Multiple Conflicts
Here, we have a tendency to compare completely different models supported interacting with multiple conflicts. The
term of multiple, describes however the model handles collision things within which there's quite 2 aircrafts. 2 general
approaches to the current case area unit employing a international approach and Pairwise approach [4]. normally
technique, the whole traffic scenario is examined at the same time by victimisation determined strategies for that.
however in Pairwise technique conflicts between aircrafts area unit resolved consecutive in pairs manner that this
technique has the consecutive and class-conscious nature.
By comparison between these 2 modes, one ought to conclude that in Pairwise conflict approach, if one conflict
resolution induces a brand new conflict, the first resolution could also be changed till a conflict-free resolution is found
[4]. though this approach is far easier than the world approach, it's feeble to resolve the conflict drawback. the world
approach considers multiple collisions at the same time and offers a worldwide resolution to resolve collisions between
aircrafts that it shows the high capabilities of this technique. however this technique needs a lot of computation and is a
lot of advanced than the Pairwise approach. The model are best (powerful) that use the world approach; however not
obligatory an excessive amount of value and overload on traffic management system. we will assume that {the
international|the worldwide|the world} and Pairwise approaches as finding native and global best in organic process
algorithms.
Figure 4: Pairwise approach for conflict resolving [4]
Figure 5: Global approach for conflict resolving [4]
7.10 Variety of Multi-agent System
This means that whether or not the projected model is meant as full automatic (i.e. may be a pure multi-agent
system) or may be a model that takes advantage of human operators and agents square measure operating with
operators to perform their duties and facilitate operators in management of traffic. It looks that it'd be higher that such
a system is employed beside current systems and dose not avoid this systems (Because in some things, humans will still
do things higher than machines). for instance, the given model in Wollkind [14] is meant as a pure multi-agent system.
8. IMPORTANT FACTORS
In previous section we tend to explained the fundamental characteristics for examination numerous multi-agent
models for conflict detection and backbone drawback in traffic, however another options that's most vital in
implementing of a conflict detection and backbone model. These options delineated in follow subsections and discuss
what quantity the projected models have the flexibility of ability with existing models, what needs is want for
implementation of projected model, what take a look at cases is employed to check the projected models and conjointly
discuss the correctness of the projected conflict detection and backbone model.
8.1 Compatibility with Existing Systems
One of the opposite necessary problems is ability and compatibility of projected models with the present traffic
management systems (current conflict detection and backbone systems). In general, a system that is ready to figure
effectively with no overall changes in existing system would be higher. Associate in Nursing example of this case is
that the projected model in [1]. Obviously, Associate in Nursing incompatible with the present traffic management
system needs a log time and additional value. during this case, system must apply elementary changes, whereas our
general goal is optimisation and reduction of prices with the precise answer for conflict detection and backbone
drawback.
8.2 Procedure quality of the Model
From procedure viewpoint, a model that imposes lower time and memory quality to the system would be additional
economical. conjointly the algorithms accustomed manage the present agents in multi-agent system would be
necessary. Since every agent is ready to perform some actions in multi-agent system, we will usually say that if we've N
agents within the multi-agent system and every agent is ready to perform the K actions, then the expected time quality
are going to be O (NKN). it's obvious that if we elect craft as Associate in Nursing agent within the projected multi-
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 19
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
agent system to the traffic management, then the procedure quality of the system are going to be terribly high.
Therefore, we want to follow specifically from multi-agent systems’ style principles.
8.3 Implementation and take a look at of Models
Another necessary issue that ought to be thought-about is that the implementation and testing of the projected
models. a number of researchers have used artificial knowledge sets to check their projected models. However, our goal
from presenting of those models is to use and implement of them within the planet surroundings. typically artificial
knowledge sets cannot represent properly show of the surroundings. another researchers are used real knowledge sets to
check their models and are evaluated potency of their technique supported this real knowledge [1]. Albeit a number of
these models were examined just some aspects of traffic management and really few models square measure thoughtabout all aspects of the traffic management as comprehensive.
8.4 Method of Conflict Detection
Conflict detection method is one amongst the numerous points. for instance, it's attainable that the system is also
detective work conflicts which is able to not occur or maybe doesn't acknowledge a number of the conflicts. a perfect
model ought to be use Associate in Nursing correct conflict detection live with the very best attainable speed, so as to
confirm Associate in Nursing adequate chance to forestall and resolve future conflicts. It looks that, the time and
therefore the speed square measure 2 necessary factors in conflict detection method.
8.5 Agents’ Behavior in Conflict Resolution method
In the conflict resolution ways, most models have targeted on the free flight topic and are elect optimisation
procedures. As already mentioned, the activities that every agent will perform in conflict resolution method square
measure necessary. In alternative words, the actions that every of the agents will perform ought to be specified they
primarily forestall conflicts occurring within the future and will have a semipermanent read of agents’ surroundings.
Actions that Associate in Nursing agent performs, ought to accomplish with highest exactness, speed Associate in
Nursingd a minimum of attainable time to be have an best action in distinction the conflicts. In general, the models
have bigger flexibility are going to be additional winning and therefore the agents that use learning techniques can act
as comparative manner supported the utility functions and can have higher performance against pre-defined solutions.
9. CONCLUSION
Obviously many ways square measure projected for conflict detection and backbone drawback in traffic management
which may be a basic structure for future models. analysis on traffic management systems continues to be considered
Associate in Nursing open and fascinating issue that our results prove this remark and therefore the want for brand new
powerful ways that automatize conflict detection and backbone can still grow as traffic densities increase.
In this paper we tend to don't seem to be think about all given multi-agent conflict detection and backbone models,
however we tend to believe, the expertise of previous researchers useful to produce a comprehensive answer to safety,
reliable, economical and best traffic management. every of the researchers in their works has been mentioned high
potential use multi-agent systems to boost traffic management and are stressed on the need use of multi-agent systems
in traffic management. exploitation of alternative distributed and new techniques with multi-agent systems in traffic
management are going to be terribly helpful.
We believe multi-agent systems technology as a robust procedure paradigm may be a valuable answer to the traffic
management drawback and particularly to the conflict detection and backbone drawback. during this paper, we tend to
introduced a scientific comparison structure to check numerous multi-agent conflict detection and backbone models;
though this paper isn't representing a whole comparison, it's a positive approach to review performance and desirability
numerous models that square measure given to this point. conjointly during this study some necessary remark
concerning implementation of projected models were reviewed that one amongst these remarks is that the lack of
comprehensive and uniform experimental knowledge to check these models. Obviously, if we tend to examined the
various models supported identical datasets, the strengths and weaknesses of those models are going to be higher
evident.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Agogino, K. Tumer, "Improving air traffic management with a learning multi-agent system", IEEE Intell.
Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 18–21, Jan/Feb. 2009
[2] Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge. U.S. De-partment of Transportation Federal Aviation
Administration Flight Standards Service. FAA-H-8083-25. 2003.
[3] M. Woolridge: "An Introduction to Multi-agent-Systems", Wiley, 2001,
http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~mjw/pubs/imas. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2012.
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 20
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
[4] J. K. Kuchar, L. C. Yang, "A Review of Conflict Detection and Resolution Modeling Methods", IEEE
Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 1, No. 4, December, 2000.
[5] M. Eby andW. Kelly, “Free flight separation assurance using distributed algorithms,” in Proc. 1999 IEEE
Aerosp. Conf., Snowmass, CO, Mar. 1999, pp. 429–44.
[6] A. Agogino, K. Tumer, “A multi-agent approach to managing air traffic flow”, Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst,
DOI 10.1007/s10458-010-9142-5, 27 June 2010.
[7] A. M. Bayen, P. Grieder, G. Meyer, C. J. Tomlin, “Lagrangian delay predictive model for sector-based air traffic
flow”. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 28, 1015– 1026, 2005.
[8] A. K. Agogino, K.Tumer, “Learning indirect actions in complex domains: Action suggestions for air traffic
control". Advances in Complex Systems, 2009, 12, 493–512.
[9] M. Ljunberg, A. Lucas, “The OASIS air traffic management system”. In Proceedings of the 2nd Pacific Rim
International Conference on AI (PRlCAI-92), Seoul, Korea, 1992.
[10] J. Rong, Sh. Geng, J. Valasek, , R. Ioerger, “Air traffic conflict negotiation and resolution using an onboard
multi-agent system”, Digital Avionics systems Conference Irvine, CA, 2002.
[11] I. Oliveira, F. Carvalho, J.Camargo, M. Sato, "Multi-agent Tools for Air Traffic Management", The 11th IEEE
International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering – Workshops, 2008.
[12] K.Tumer, A. Agogino, "Adaptive Management of Air Traffic Flow: A Multi-agent Coordination Approach",
Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2008.
[13] N. Archambault, N. Durand, "Scheduling Heuristics For on-Board Sequential Air Conflict Solving", IEEE,
2004.
[14] S. Wollkind, J. Valasek, RT. Ioerger, “Automated confilict resolution for air traffic management using
cooperative multi-agent negotiation”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 2004.
[15] G. Valkanas, P. Natsiavas, N. Bassiliades, "A collision detection and resolution multi-agent approach using
utility functions", Fourth Balkan Conference in Informatics, 2009.
[16] C. Tomlin, G. Pappas, S. Sastry, "Conflict Resolution for Multi- Agent Hybrid Systems", Proceedings of the
35th, Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan December 1996.
[17] D. Sislak, J. Samek, Pechoucek, P. Volf, M. Pˇechouˇcek, "Multi-party Collision Avoidance among Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles", IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2007.
[18] V. Gorodetsky O. Karsaev V. Kupin, V. Samoilov, "Agent-Based Air Traffic Control in Airport Airspace", 2007
IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2007 IEEE.
[19] J. Miguel, L. Gómez, J. Besada, “design of an air-air negotiation protocol to reorder aircraft arrivals sequence",
ieee, 2008.
[20] K. Harper, S. Mulgund, S. Guarino, A.Mehta, G. acharias, "Air traffic controller agent model for free flight,” in
Proc. 1999 AIAA Guidance, Navigat., Contr. Conf., Portland, OR, Aug. 1999, AIAA-99-3987, pp. 288–301.
[21] J.P. Wangermann, R.F. Stengel, ”Principled negotiation between intelligent agents: A model for air traffic
management", in Proc. ICAS, vol. 3, Anaheim, CA, Sept. 1994, pp. 2197–2207.
[22] C. Tomlin, G. Pappas, and S. Sastry, “Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multi-agent
hybrid systems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 43, pp. 509–521, Apr. 1998.
[23] J.P. Wangermann, R.F. Stengel, "Optimization and coordination of multi-agent systems using principled
negotiation,” in Proc. AIAA Guidance, Navigat. Contr. Conf., San Diego, CA, July 1996, pp. 43–50.
[24] E.R. Johnson, I.C. Hill, J.K. Archibald, R.L. Frost, W.C. Stirling, "A Satisficing Approach to Free Flight" ,
IEEE, 2005.
[25] J.K. Archibald, J.C. Hill, N.A. Jepsen, W.C. Stirling, R.L. Frost, "A Satisficing Approach to Aircraft Conflict
Resolution" , IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—Part C: Applications And Reviews, Vol.
38, No. 4, July 2008.
[26] B. M. Albaker, N.A. Rahim, "Straight Projection Conflict Detection and Cooperative Avoidance for Autonomous
Unmanned Aircraft Systems", 2009 IEEE.
[27] M.A. Vilaplana, C. Goodchild, "Application of Distributed Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Aircraft
Operations", 2001 IEEE.
[28] D. Sislak, J. Samek, M. Pechoucek, N. Suri, "Automated Conflict Resolution Utilizing Probability Collectives
Optimizer", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—Part C: Applications And Reviews, Vol.
41, No. 3, May 2011.
[29] W. Chao, G. Jing, "Analysis of Air Traffic Flow Control through Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation",
International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, IEEE, 2009.
[30] M. Nguyen-Duc, J.P. Briot, A. Drogoul, “An application of Multi-Agent Coordination Techniques in Air Traffic
Management”, Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology
(IAT’03), 2003.
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 21
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
ISSN 2319 - 4847
[31] H. Erzberg,"Automated Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Control", Ames Research Center.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/archive/nasa/casintrs.gov/20050242942_2005243395.pdf, 2005. Access date 20 Oct
2011.
[32] W. Glover, J. Lygeros, “A Multi-Aircraft Model for Conflict Detection and Resolution algorithm Evaluation”,
hybridge Project IST-2001-32460, Work Package WP1, Deliverable D1.3, 2004.
[33] L. Pallottino, E. Feron, A. Bicchi, "Conflict Resolution Problems For Air Traffic Management Systems Solved
With Mixed Integer Programming", IEEE Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1,
March 2002.
[34] Tomlin, C., Pappas, G.J., and Sastry, S., “Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Management: a Study in MultiAgent Hybrid Systems,” subMDted to IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 1997.
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2012
Page 22