Report of the Performance and Asset
Management Advisory Council
MassDOT-Highway Division
January 20, 2016
Purpose of the Report
Asset Management Decision Making Process
The report does:
 Establish asset inventory
 Assess current condition
 Model performance over time
given investment levels
 Assist in developing investment
portfolios
Goals & Objectives
Asset Inventory
Condition Assessment &
Performance Modeling
Alternatives Evaluation &
Program Optimization
Short and Long Range
Plans
(Project Selection)
The report does not:
ₓ Establish performance goals
ₓ Establish short term and long
term investment plans
Program Implementation
Performance Monitoring
2
Budget / Allocations
Contained in the Report
 Interstate and Non-interstate Pavement
• Inventory, Condition, Value
• Network Performance at Varying Investment Levels
 Bridge Assets
• Inventory, Condition, Value
• SD Trends based on Varying Investment Levels
 Other Assets
• Tunnels, Ancillary Structures, Curb Ramps, Traffic
Signs, Traffic Signals
 Next Steps
3
Pavement Highlights
 Highway Division is responsible for managing $22.5
billion in pavement assets
 Condition is assessed based on Pavement
Serviceability Index (0-5) and translated to
Poor/Fair/Good/Excellent scale.
4
Statewide, 81 percent of the MassDOT-owned, non-turnpike Interstate system in
Massachusetts is considered to be in good or excellent condition.
MassDOT Owned, Non-Turnpike, Interstate Pavement Condition (2014 Data)
100%
90%
% Roadway Inventory
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6
Poor
Fair
Good
5
Excellent
Overall
Interstate Pavement Network Performance Outcomes Given Varying
Investment Levels (December 2015 Model, 2014 Pavement Data)
100
95
% Good or Excellent
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Year
65 Million (Current)
52 Million
6
35 Million
2024
2025
Bridge Highlights
 Highway Division is responsible for managing $10.8
billion in bridge assets
 Condition is assessed based on NBIS Structural
Evaluation Scale and categorized as SD or non-SD
 ABP program has been very successful in reducing our
SD bridge count statewide, but report shows that
continued investment is needed
7