Enclosure #l Pacific Northwest Wildfire Coordinating Group Pacific Northwest Training Working Team Fiscal Year 1999 Program of Work 1. Conduct 20 to 25 courses during the training year ending in May 1999. (FY 98-99 Training Ongoing Season) Coordination done by Redmond Training Center. 2. Revise course offerings, projection of participation, and nomination process for FY 99-00 Training Season. Operations and TWT will both be involved in this process. 2/l 5/99,5/l 5/99 3. Increase information flow/availability to users by developing TWT web page linked to PNWCG’s page. 2/l/99 4. Develop a trainee identification and mobilization process proposal. Operations and T%VT will both be involved in this process. 5/l/99 5. Recruit and fill Interior Training Specialist position at Redmond. Establish work priorities for the position for remainder of year. 4/l/99 6. Assess impacts of the adoption of NWCG decisions in the new 3 lo- 1. Operations and TWT will both be involved in this process. Ongoing 7. Design and conduct annual Training Officers Meeting. 5/l 5/99 8. Administer 300 and 400 level NWCG course offerings by Public Education Providers and Private sector training providers. Develop an audit process for this portion of our progrZW99 9. Develop feasibility study and implementation process for intern/mentor program. 6/l/99 10. Evaluate and implement when feasible the use of new technology for training delivery. Ongoing 11. Coordinate training needs with other GA’s, assess performance based training needs, analyze course attendance, cancellations, and track incident assignments for last five years for IACR, FNSC, and ATGS, AON. (Redmond LATC) Ongoing Funding is being requested in the amount of %2,500.00 for a facilitator/secretary to speed dissemination of information to other teams and to the field units. Enclosure #2 TO: Pacific Northwest Coordination Group FROM: Chair, Aviation Working Group SUBJECT: Aviation Safety Issues The PNWCG Aviation Working Group (AWG) identified the following aviation safety concerns that require action and direction from PNWCG. We have enclosed the original hazard identification (SAFECOM’S) which explain the safety concerns of the following issues; Issue 1. Non-Standard Aircraft Call Signs (enclosure 1) Recommendation: Further define signs within Pacific Northwest as defined in recommendations from Earl Palmer. (enclosure 1) Issue 2. 2) Non-Standard Aviation Initial Radio Contact Procedures. (enclosure Recommendation: Require Central Washington Interagency Communications Center to follow standard aviation radio communications procedures. (enclosure 2) The Aviation Working Group requests PNWCG address these aviation safety concerns at the earliest opportunity. Phil Hufstader Chair, PNWCG Aviation Working Group r OCT+-1998 . 583 888 2586 USFS/ELM FRM 89:48 P. 03116 4 SllPECOM Reported By (Optional) I I Phone S41/~48-@ls3 IName Ward Monroe I AVIATTON SAFETY COMMUNIQUE IOrganization Central OR Fire Mut. Date 8/m/97( Redmond Air Ce er IAddress .I'E' Mail A d d r e s s W.Monroe&IDOCa - I 1 IFVENTI Date -g/&g/s Damage? Y_ NJ Local time 1230 Injuries? Y_ NJ MO Day Yr 24 hour clock State m Location ODF Incident at 44 35.1 X 119 30.5. Near J_ohn Day River Airport, City, Lat/Long, or Fire Name IflISSIONI Air Attack Leah~bm?. and Retardant DroD Type Pax,Cargo,Recon,Sling,Longline,etc. Procurement Contract, Fleet Contract,GW, Rental, Fleet ,etc. Number of Persons Onboard-Special Use? Y_ N_ Haz Mat Onboard? Y-N_ Departure Point Re_dmond, OR Destination Redmond, OR lAIRCR+FTl Manufacturer (Reg)N## Owner/Operator I~~RATIVBI Model, Pilot Please provide a brief explanation of the event. See attached narrative ICORRECTIVs ACTZONI This issue wag addressed by the Regional Aviation Leadership Team on Aug 20. This issue was assigned to Earl Palmer to write an issue paper co be presented to PNWCG Aviation Working Group for resolution and action. Excellent recommendations and heads up hazard identification. oding: For use of Regional Aviation Safety Manager. CAUSE 61 171 PHASE ITI Form FS 5700-14 (OAS-34) 171 Jan lii OCCURWCE 96 i;l 131 101 TYPE jF/ Data Tracking#97-06-068-O-12 r oc-r_i@l-1998 89:48 USFWELM FfVl 503 888 2586 P. 04/16 Ai? Attack 63F, Lead 67, Airtanker 68 responded to Malheur NF incident #249 at approximately 1100 hours on 8/18/97. Jumper 732 and Helicopter 6MV were already on sceire. We arrived on scene, made contact with the IX. for I)249 and dropped l/2 of the load of retardant from T-68. I contacted Malheur Dispatch and asked if they had another fire that could use a half a load of retardant. Malheur dispatch responded vith a Lat. and Long. for an ODF fire North of our location. Lead 67, T-68, AA63F proceeded to the new incident. I asked Malheur Dispatch who the Ground Contact and what radio frequency was being used. Malheur Dispatch responded with: "Unit 7” is the ground contact, frequency 151.205 TX and RX with a Tone of 146.2. I svitched the #2 radio in the AA aircraft to 151.305 and called unit 7 several times without success. By this time, Lead 67, T-68 and AA63F were all over the ODF Xncident. The leadplane and Airtanker wqre making dry runs over the fire, waiting for me to make sure there were no people on the fireline before we dropped. ,Xnitially, I: was , unable to make radio contact due to a programming error. After reprogramming the frequency I had good radio contact with ODF Dispatch and 9602 the I.C. I then heard a conversation between "9602" and T-68 on ODF. They were diecussing the drop and the fire was clear to drop on. I then heard a request from John Day Dispatch, (ODF dispatcher) to T-68 for the Wictorr air-to-air frequency we were all using because "they vanted CO give it to Unit 7, their aerial detection aircraft and waa in the vicinity of the fire". This was the first indication any of us had over the fire that Unit 7 was an aircraft. We then heard Unit 7 calling on the Victor frequency, I made contact with the pilot and determined she was 15 miles avay at SSOO feet MSL and was a Cessna 180. She also indicated she would be returning to the Incident we were dropping retardant on. We informed her of the altitude of Lead 67 and T-68 of 5000 to 5500, the Air Attack at 9,400 and ask her to call 5 minutes out and come in at 7,SO0. we completed the drop in tvo’runs, left the fire and returned to Redmond without seeing Unit 7. Although Malheur Dispatch should have advised us that Unit 7 was an aircraft, this potentially serious incident was precipitated by a lack of standardization. Xn many places in the Northwest Geographic Area, our aerial detection aircraft are using call signs that may or may not indicate they are aircraft. Some examples: Recon 1, Air Patrol, Unit 7, Patrol Plane 71 Alpha. One of the very basic premises of ICS and Interagency Cooperation is common tertninoloy for the resources. It is my recommendation we establish a standard radio identifier for all aerial detection aircraft being used in the Northwest Geographical Area in fact it should be Nation wide that clearly identifies the resource is or could be an aircraft over a fire or within the vicinity. CCTT01-1998 . 09:41 503 808 2586 USFS/ELM FfW 0 . .J I .* MESSAGE SCAN To J.PAYNE:Rfi/PH'W cc W.BULGER:R6/PNW From: Postmark: Subject: EARL PALMER:R06F01D06A Aug 31,97 4:02 PM CALL P. 0546 . FOR JAMES E. PAYNE . Delivered: Aug 31,97 4:03 PM SIGNS Reference Safecom 97-06-068-o-12 Please find enclosed a sumary of the current conditions and a proposal to go to NWCG to help solve this problem. I ran the paper through Ward Monroe. Earl OCT-pi-1998 . . 89:41 USFSELM FAM 5 8 3 e8e 2586 cad Sigh utilized within the ICS On August 18, 1997 Air Attack 63F, Tanker 68, and %ead 67 were working an Oregon Department of Forestry fire. Malheur Dispatch had previously given "Unit 7" as the contact. and it was understood by Air Attack 63F that Unit 7 was ground based. As the action progressed it was discovered that Unit 7 wadr actually a reconnaissance aircraft. With several aircraft converging over a single incident it ia critical to know what each persons or units position and amigned task is in relation to the incident. Knowing the assigned task also allows for a pretty good idea of where they may be on the incident and at what altitude they may be. As an example; The call efgn "Engine 12" would immediately let you know that you vouldn't need to worry about an in-air conflict. "Engine 12" should trigger concern for ground location in relation to retardant drops however. #Copter l2Z" would trigger the thought that the helicopter most likely would be working fairly close to the ground and would not likely pose a threat to mid-air collision for Air Attack, but, would be a concern for Lead 67 and Tanker 68 while on an actual drop run. “Jumper 782 cal sign would let you know that they could be working the fire from 3000' down to 200' AGL. "Unit 7" without some other identifying feature transmitted leaves one with the thought of who, what, and where are you. It now requires time and effort to determine the who, what, and where of Unit 7. This time could be far better apent devoted to the assigned task. It is far easier to find a target when you know it’s approximate altitude and direction. ICS IIandbook 410-l lists several call signs; Lead, Copter, Tanker; it does not however define Air Attack, Recon, or Helitanker. The use of these call signs all clarify the purpose of the aircraft or individual involved. IC vould be of great value to further define call signs within the Pacific Northwest and gain support and agreement from our partners. We euggest the following units or functions to be included. . Lead denotes a leadplane, the number identifies which “LEAb” 61, 67, 69, ETC. person is piloting the aircraft. *TANKER 61" are assigned Denotes an airplane configured for dropping retardants. Numbers to individual companies. "COPTER 61X" or "COPTER 532" Denotes a helicopter; the number is generally the last three digits of the 2?-number or could be, as used in Region S, the number assigned to an individual base. "IIELITANKER 42" Denotes a large helicopter with a drop tank capable of delivering retardants simular to a large airplane. "AIR ATTACK 61X" or "AIR ATTACK 61" or VABTN AIR ATTACV Denotes an Air Tactical Group Supervisor in an aircraft. "61X" takes the identification from the N-number of the aircraft. m6111 is an individual with the number 61 assigned, simular to a leadplane pilot. 8*Cabinn is the airborne Air Tactical Group Supervisor assigned to the Cabin fire. Any of these various F’.86/16 . . .* ’ . . CKTyal-1998 * lay:41 USFS/ELM FAM 583 888 2586 identification forms would be acceptable. AEI more Air Attack persons are trained and assigned, it would be well to assigrr individual numbers. "AIR RECON 61X" Denotes a person in an aircraft doing reconnaissance, surveillance, scout, or detection work. The number ie taken from the last three digits of the aircraft N-number. P. 87/16 Octal-1998 89:41 583 EBE 2586 USFSELM FRM P. 88/16 3eported By (Uptiow~ Craig M. Hall Name: Phone: 9709385 1325 Region 6 Other: 8/I/98 Organizatioa: Date: bate: Location: 7130198 Loclll T i m e : 1300 ~n;suries; White Pass Wenatchee NF 4gency [nvalved: NO Region 6 Other: Other? Other: Procurement: Contract 5 Persons Inboard: Departure Point: lumber: Damage: State: Washington Fire, Helitack ran No Special Use: Jefferson Helibase N97HJ knerloperrtor: Yes Hazardous Materials: NO Destination: Fire Manufacturer: ~~11 H&jet 384 Model: 2054 Pilot: Pete McNeil ~AJ#,KA’l?‘i% (Pleaseprovide a brief explanattin of the even&) LS an initial attack IC on fire 384, I did not have direct communication contact I Jeff&son Helibase. I had to use Wenatchee Forest personnel to relay my fire ornmunication to helibase. It was confusing because the Wenatchee Forest use! ifExent radio protocal from all other forest, state agencies, and emergency redical services that I have worked with through out the United States. (Ex: renatchee states station calling first as opposed to most agencies stating unit eing called first). I had not been briefed on this forest policy, but I had noticed iat the Crammer complejc communication unit followed the Wenatcliee rotocal. I view this nonstandard policy as a serious safety concern. I feel that ir fire or medical emerge&y vital information could possibly be missed, Dmpromising safety. s an initial attack IC on fire 384, I did not have direct communication contact 1 Jefferson Helibase. I had to use Wenatchee Forest personnel to relay my fire xnmunication to helibase. It was confusing because the Wenatchee Forest uses ifferent radio protocal from all other forest, state agencies, and emergency medical services that I have worked with through out the United States. (Ex: httpY2OS. 173.2.4/safecom/searchone.asp?ID=243 9118198 OCT-@l-1998 Y-a ir - -.--“a 09:42 _‘.V., . . USFWELM FfW . a--. --aww”mu 503 EBE 2586 _ _P.O9/16 g-m w-w OCT+Il-1996 09:42 Tratkfng #: 98-244 Date: 8/I/98 I Injuries: NO bed The: Region 6 Damage: N O * State: WaShingon other: Other: Communications Fire (Other) Other: Procurement: Special Yes Use: PMSOUS Inboard: lumber: P. 10/16 Y Region 6 Other: 8/l/98 O&llliZMiOIG Date: btion: Wenatchee NF raii 503 808 2586 USFS/ELM FRM N/A 3wner/Operator: N/A Manufacturer,: N/A Hazardous Materials: NO Model: N/A pilot: N/A ?ARRA’l~-(Please provide a btief ex#zrratim of the evenk) Vhile flying the Cleveland and several other fires in central Washington I have xmd out how co&x&g Wenatchee dispatch is making our communications ver the fire. They do not seem to und&stand that we (aviation) have to listen nd talk on multiple radios and that we listen for our call sign in the standard rder and filter traffic that is not essential to our mission. We don’t need to go xto this to deeply but I would like to relate a particular sequence of radio trafEc etween myself, the fire and dispatch. Assigned to the fire were tankers 07,130, 31,133,25,412. Helicopters; 410,412,864, alongwithlead 64 (myself) and umerous ground contacts. To keep things simple and efficient you listen for our call sign or for the reply of a call you may have made-standard procedure i to hear your call si (thus you are alerted) and then you listen for who is alling. With Waatc ees !!F cment procedures they say Wenatchee.... Lead 64.... ow, I do not know if helicopter 864 is calling Wenatchee or there is another 611 sign out there that I am unaware of, or what????? This became particul~ othersome and apparant with helicopter 864 on this &e because his call sign eing so close to mine. It is unacceptabIe to me to have to deal with this. tispatch is there for us on the fire. They need to help in making ommun@ions run smooth1 and efficiently. They are cunently contributing ) more congestion on the radyios, causi~~g multiple calls and interruptions of 9/l 8198 OCT+l-1998 89:43 583 EZIE! 2586 USFS/ELM FFIM P. 1146 the Cleveland and several other fires in central Washington I have : w co&sing Wenatchee dispatch is making our communication They do not seem to understand that we (aviation) have to listen we provide to the folks on communications This is the second SAFECOM on same subject. Please read for clarity of the Safay issues as it is well resented. As noted in SAFECOM 98-243 I too believe this is unacceptabPe and am placing this issue as the number one aviation safety hazard in the region. Bill Bulger W&M http://205 173.2.4kafecom/searchone.asp?ID=244 9/l 8198 I OCT+l-1998 09:43 USFS/ELM FfVl 583 e8e 2586 P.12/16 Issue: Aircraft Radio Contact Procedures The obvious safety concerns on this issue are clearly defined in the 2 Safecorn’s enclol;ed. My additional followup to this issue was to contact the Federal Communications Center (FCC). I was advised that the Central Washington Interagency Communications center (CWICC) was an FCC lincensed “Aeronautical Multicorn Station”. I explained to the FCC the current CWICC aviation radio contact procedures and the related safety hazrd it presented. I was advised that they felt this was in conflict with Operator License Rules 47 C.F.R Part 13 and they could send a field inspector to CWICC to evaluate the issue. I did not request a field inspection and felt it could be settled locally. However, I have been unseccessful in my attempts to have CWICC change to the National Standard. Bill Bulgq Forest ‘Service, Regional Aviation Safety Manger I CCT,@l-1998 89:44 USFSELM FtVl 503 888 2586 P. 13116 p wireless Pi3 felecommunlcations Bureau ’ “. m AIRCRAFT STATIONS Most radio stations used in aviation are part of the Aeronautical Mobile Service, which includes both airborne and land stations, There are different classes of aeronautical mobile stations: - Airborne stations, or aircraft stations, are simply those radios that are used in flight. They may be installed on board a plane, helicopter, .blimp or even a manned hot-air balloon. Airborne stations are further defined in the rules as air carrier aircraft stations, used in aircraft that carry passengers or cargo for hire; private aircraft stations; and flight test stations and aviation instructional stations. All airborne stations may transmit and receive only messages necessary for safe flight operations. (Aeronautical public service stations are also airborne stations but they are not part of the aeronautical mobile service. They are used exactly like public ship stations to carry messages for passengers or crew members to and from public coast stations.) . - Aeronautical advisory stations, also called unicorn stations, are land stations used for advising pilots of private aircraft about local airport conditions. They are not used to control aircraft in flight. - Aeronautical multicom stations provide communications between private aircraft and a ground facility for temporary, or emergency activkties like cropdusting, livestock herding, forest firefighting, aerial advertising, parachute jumping, etc. In Some cases, multicom stations may be authorized to serve as u - Aeronautical enroute stations are used by aircraft owners or operators for operational control and flight management of their aircraft. They have access to these stations by cooperative arrangement, but any pilot with a flight emergency may use these stations without prior agreement. - Flight test stations are airbdrne and ground stations used only to pass information or instructions concerning tests of aircraft or airborne components. - Aviation support stations are airborne and ground stations used only for pilot training, soaring (with gliders) I or OCT-al-199e 89:44 USFSELM FRM 583 eae 25e6 P.14/16 free ballooning. - Airdrome control stations provide all necessary communications between an airport control tower and a11 arriving and departing aircraft. They are used to maintain an efficient flow of traffic for aircraft taxiing, landing# and taking off and for all vehicle movement on the airfield. For the latter purposes, airdrome control stations communicate with aeronautical utility mobile stations. - Aeronautical utility mobile stations are installed in vehicles that provide maintenance, fire and crash protection, freight handling, or other group support normal.ly under control tower direction at an airport. They are used for both operational and emergency communications. - Aeronautical search and rescue stations are used for air-to-ground communications during actual or practice search and rescue operations, or for search and rescue training. Forfurtherinfionnation, please contact the Private Wireless Division at(202)418-0680 or&nail at Lastreviewetiupdated: September 18, 1997 vvww.fcc.gov/wtb/aircrftbtml of2 OCTsBl-1998 09:45 USFS/BLM FRM 583 888 2586 P. 15/16 p Wireless fel Tekcommunbations ’ I. - 8ureau GROUND STATIONS The FCC regulates the Aviation Services in cooperation with the Aviation Administration. Wherever aviation services are provided in U.S. territory, both FAA and FCC requirements must be met by anyone who uses aviation radio, In addition, civil aircraft on international flights az subject= to international radio regulations intended to safeguard air travelers worldwide. Flight safety is the primary purpose of all Aviatic Se-ices. The Aeronautical Fixed Service is a system of fixed stations used f point-to-point communications about aviation safety, navigation, or preparation for flight. Aeronautical Radionavigation Se-ice The Aeronautical Radionavigation Service is made up of stations use for navigation, obstruction warning, instrument landing, and measurement of altitude and range. Air navigation stations are usually operated by t Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), so technically they are not radic services regulated by the FCC. The FCC does license some na,vigation stat however, if the service is needed where the FAA does not provide it. In cases, the FCC authorizes private operators to provide air navigation services in strict compliance with FAA requirements. As in the maritime services, radionavigation stations also include radiobeacons, and these other aids to air navigation: . Glide path stations are directional radiobeacons associated with instrument landing s)istems used to guide the descent of aircraft landing. Marker beacons are transmitters that radiate vertically to provic' positioning information to aircraft in flight. Omni-directional range stations transmit signals in all direction from which aircraft can determine their bearing. Land Test Stations transmit signals for testing and calibrating a navigation aids. Ifyou have any comments or questions about this information, pleasecontactthe Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202)418-0680 or E-mail at ~a~dav@fcc.~ OCT-,81-1998 89:45 USFS/ELM FAM 583 E88 2 5 8 6 e*vycIrl- P. 16/16 of a radio station is responsible at all times for the proper operation of the, station, Radio operators should use the following guidelines to make radio a usefirl tool for safe an& efficient flight: The licensee 0 0 0 l l TUNEBOTH IIWNWI’TTERAND RECEIVERTO THE CORRECT CHAiWELS. BESURETHE CHANNEL IS CLEAR BEFORE MS-G. BE BRIEF. TRANSMIT ESSENTIAL MESSAGES ONLY. SHORTEN OR ELIMINATE TEST CALLS ON THE W OR IN FLIGHT IDENTIFY TRANSMSSIONS UrITH FCC CALL SIGN OR FAA “N” NUMBER FCC INFORMATION (FORMS, FEES, RULES) l l l FCC Form Distribution Center (8W) 418-FORM (3676) For downloading at _httD://WWW.fcc.pav/formDa~e.html. FCC Fax-On-Demand system -- calI(202) 418-0177 from the handset of your fax machine, Follow the recorded instructions to have FC6 Form 404 (document retrieval number 000404) or FCC Form 753 (document retrieval number 000753) sent directly to your fax machine. FEES l . FCC National Call Center (888) 225-5322 All details concerning radio service eligibility, appkation procedures, operating requikments, and equipment standards can be found in the FCC Rules. You are not required, however, to cv a copy of the ruk!L . Maritime Serivce Rules a7 C.F.R. Part 80 T Operator License Rules 47 C.F.R. Part 132 \ Thexules are adable for a fee from the Govemment Printing Office at (202) 5124803. please contact the FCC National Call Center toll free at l-888.CAtL-FCC ail to caIlctr@ninhtwind.fcc.~ov Last reviewed/updated: November 14,1996 TOD of PaFze _-._- . . .._._.. I 11 Aviation and Marine Radio Services 11 WTB HQI.IW._ 11 FCC Home 11 .-.-..c., . .--I www.fcc.govktb/fctsht4.htmI TOTQL P. 16