AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT
FOR
YONGE SUBWAY EXTENTION
FROM FINCH STATION
TO RICHMOND HILL CENTRE TERMINAL
URS Project No.: 33015719
Prepared for:
YORK REGION RAPID TRANSIT CORPORATION, TORONTO TRANSIT
COMMISSION & CITY OF TORONTO
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0
2.0
3.0
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................. 1
EXISTING AIR QUALITY ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 2
3.1
Ambient Air Quality Criteria...................................................................................................... 2
3.2
Metropolitan Toronto Air Quality .............................................................................................. 2
3.2.1 MOE Monitoring Station Results .......................................................................................... 3
3.2.2 Background Concentrations................................................................................................... 3
3.3
Air Quality in the Vicinity of the Yonge Subway Extension ..................................................... 4
3.4
Climatology ................................................................................................................................ 4
3.4.1 Dispersion Climatology ......................................................................................................... 4
3.4.2 Wind Climate......................................................................................................................... 4
3.4.3 Atmospheric Stability ............................................................................................................ 4
3.4.4 Mixing Height........................................................................................................................ 5
4.0
PREDICTING THE EFFECTS OF THE UNDERTAKING........................................................... 5
4.1
Approach to Effect Prediction .................................................................................................... 5
4.2
Criteria and Standards................................................................................................................. 5
4.2.1 Air Quality Standards and Criteria for Construction ............................................................. 5
4.2.2 Air Quality Standards and Criteria for Vehicular Emissions................................................. 6
4.3
Construction Impacts .................................................................................................................. 6
4.3.1 Sources of Fugitive Dust ....................................................................................................... 6
4.3.2 Survey of Sensitive Areas...................................................................................................... 7
4.4
Vehicle Exhaust Impact Prediction............................................................................................. 7
4.4.1 Scenarios Examined............................................................................................................... 7
4.4.2 Traffic Emissions Estimation and Background Pollutant Levels ........................................ 12
4.4.2.1 MOBILE 6.2C Input Parameters ................................................................................ 13
4.4.3 Dispersion Modeling ........................................................................................................... 17
4.4.3.1 Traffic Volumes and Intersection Light Cycles.......................................................... 17
4.4.3.2 Receptor and Roadway Coordinates........................................................................... 18
4.4.3.3 Surface Roughness...................................................................................................... 18
4.4.3.4 Meteorological Conditions.......................................................................................... 18
4.4.4 Prediction of Worst-Case Pollutant Levels.......................................................................... 19
5.0
RESULTS OF PREDICTION ....................................................................................................... 21
5.1
Construction Effects ................................................................................................................. 21
5.1.1 Suspended Particulate Matter Concentrations ..................................................................... 21
5.1.2 Dust Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................... 21
5.1.2.1 Response to and Control of Dust Problems ................................................................ 23
5.2
Traffic Effects........................................................................................................................... 24
5.2.1 Results of Dispersion Modeling .......................................................................................... 24
6.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 27
6.1
Construction Effects ................................................................................................................. 27
6.2
Traffic Effects........................................................................................................................... 27
7.0
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 30
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
i.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
TABLES
Table 2.0
Table 3.2-1
Table 4.4.2.1.1
Table 4.4.2.1.2
Table 4.4.3.1.3
Table 4.4.3.1.3A
Table 4.4.3.1.4
Table 4.4.3.1.4A
Table 4.4.3.1.5
Table 4.4.3.1.5A
Table 4.4.3.4
Table 4.4.4
Table 5.1.2
Table 5.2.1-A
Table 5.2.1-B
Table 6.2.1
Table 6.2.2
Table 6.2.3
Table A-1
Table A-2
Table B-1
Table B-2
Table C-1
Table C-2
Table F-1
Proposed Subway Station Descriptions
Ambient Air Quality Summary (2006)
Vehicle Mix Data
MOBILE6.2C Input Parameters
Estimated Composite CO Emission Factors
Estimated Idling CO Emission Factors
Estimated Composite NOx Emission Factors
Estimated Idling NOx Emission Factors
Estimated Composite PM2.5 Emission Factors
Estimated Idling PM2.5 Emission Factors
Input Matrix for CAL3QHC
Intersection Model Runs
Efficiency of Dust Mitigation Measures
Summary and Analysis of CAL3QHC Modeling Results for CO and PM2.5
Summary and Analysis of CAL3QHC Modeling Results for NOx
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria Steeles Station
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria
Langstaff/Longbridge Station
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria Richmond Hill
Centre Station
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Discrete Receptor Information
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
Langstall/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Discrete Receptor
Information
Richmond Hill Center Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Termina, Link Information
Richmond Hill Center Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Discrete Receptor
Information
PM Peak-Hour Intersection Signal Times
Figures
Figure 4.4.1-1
Figure 4.4.1-2
Figure 4.4.1-3
Figure A-1
Figure A-2
Figure A-3
Figure A-4
Figure A-5
Figure A-6
Figure A-7
Figure A-8
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Steeles Subway Station Location
Langstaff/Longbridge Subway Station Location
Richmond Hill Centre Subway Station Location
Steeles Station Links – No-Build
Steeles Station Links – Build
Steeles Station Receptor Locations
Run A-1, Yonge & Steeles, No Build, NOx
Run A-2, Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
Run A-3, Yonge & Steeles, No Build, PM2.5
Run A-4, Yonge & Steeles, Build, NOx
Run A-5, Yonge & Steeles, Build, CO
ii.
Project: 33015719
Figure A-9
Figure B-1
Figure B-2
Figure B-3
Figure B-4
Figure B-5
Figure B-6
Figure B-7
Figure B-8
Figure B-9
Figure C-1
Figure C-2
Figure C-3
Figure C-4
Figure C-5
Figure C-6
Figure C-7
Figure C-8
Figure C-9
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Run A-6, Yonge & Steeles, Build, PM2.5
Langstaff/Longbridge Station Links – No-Build
Langstaff/Longbridge Station Links – Build
Langstaff/Longbridge Station Receptor Locations
Run B-1, Yonge & Langstaff, No Build, NOx
Run B-2, Yonge & Langstaff, No Build, CO
Run B-3, Yonge & Langstaff, No Build, PM2.5
Run B-4, Yonge & Langstaff, Build, NOx
Run B-5, Yonge & Langstaff, Build, CO
Run B-6, Yonge & Langstaff, Build, PM2.5
Richmond Hill Centre Station Links – No-Build
Richmond Hill Centre Station Links – Build
Richmond Hill Centre Station Receptor Locations
Run C-1, Yonge & Garden, No Build, NOx
Run C-2, Yonge & Garden, No Build, CO
Run C-3, Yonge & Garden, No Build, PM2.5
Run C-4, Yonge & Garden, Build, NOx
Run C-5, Yonge & Garden, Build, CO
Run C-6, Yonge & Garden, Build, PM2.5
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Steeles Station Analysis
Langstaff/Longbridge Station Analysis
Richmond Hill Centre Station Analysis
CAL3QHC Input and Output Files
Mobile 6.2 Input and Output File
Intersection Signal Times
iii.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Regional Municipality of York, in partnership with York Region Rapid Transit Corporation, initiated
a Transit Project Assessment to determine the best alignment and station locations for a future subway
extension from the Finch Station to the proposed northern terminus at the Richmond Hill Centre
(Highway 7 and Yonge). If the subway is constructed, trips currently made by automobile can be made
by transit instead, hence, the overall impact of the Yonge Subway Extension on air quality on a regional
scale, will be positive. Also, a report from the Victoria Transport Policy Institute in Canada, that
evaluated rail transit benefits based on a comprehensive analysis of transportation system performance in
United States (US) cities, found that cities with larger, well-established rail systems have significantly
higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per capita vehicle ownership and mileage, less traffic
congestion, lower traffic death rates, higher energy conservation, and higher emissions reduction.
Future development around the proposed stations is likely to be more transit-oriented, which reduces the
rate of growth of automobile traffic. However, localized areas of air quality degradation could occur from
operation of the subway extension where stations with commuter parking and bus terminal facilities are
proposed. As part of this study, an investigation of potential impacts on air quality in the local area from
(a) construction activities and (b) vehicular emissions has been conducted for the preferred design to
evaluate and quantify these impacts, where possible.
As part of the Yonge Subway Extension, the construction of six (6) subway stations and affiliated parking
facilities is proposed. The study area is roughly bounded by Finch Avenue (south), Bathurst Street (west),
Bayview Avenue (east) and Carrville Road/16th Avenue (north). The three areas that will be most
influenced by the subway extension are the stations that contain bus terminals and commuter parking
facilities, specifically:
i.
Yonge/Steeles in the vicinity of the proposed Steeles Station.
ii. Yonge/Langstaff in the vicinity of the proposed Langstaff/Longbridge Station.
iii. Richmond Hill Centre in the vicinity of Yonge and Highway 7.
Emissions can occur during construction of the Undertaking, over a relatively short time period, and from
the ongoing operation of the Undertaking, particularly vehicular emissions.
The impact from construction activities related to the Undertaking will be associated primarily with
emissions of Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) in the air and dustfall on objects such as cars and
windows resulting from open-pit and cut and cover construction techniques, demolition, and carryout by
construction vehicles, leading to grinding and re-suspension of construction dust by regular traffic on
public roads. If uncontrolled, these emissions could result in off-site concentrations that exceed the
Ministry of the Environment (MOE) standards and affect nearby residences and commercial
establishments as well as pedestrians. In order to meet the provincial standards, control efficiencies
ranging up to 70% for SPM and 95% for dustfall may be required.
To promote compliance with MOE’s criteria, the TTC Master Specifications requires that contractors
incorporate mitigation or control measures into construction activities as specified in the Controls and
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
iv.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Methods Plan. The MOE expects that emission from construction operations will comply with the O.
Reg. 419/05 SPM criteria. Therefore, control measures articulated in the Controls and Methods Plan will
need to be carried out and monitored diligently in order to comply with MOE’s requirements.
The primary impact from vehicular emissions are associated with carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen
oxides (NOx), (comprised of two principal components, nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)),
and to a lesser extent particulate matter (PM) which is further divided into three size fractions; Suspended
Particulate Matter (SPM) with a Particle size less than 44 microns, PM10 with particle sizes less than 10
micron and PM2.5 with particle sizes less than 2.5 micron. Other pollutants, primarily benzene, 1,3butadiene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein, collectively known as Air Toxics, have also been
associated with emissions from vehicles, particularly the heavy duty diesel vehicle (HDDV) category
(which does not include buses). Since HDDVs are not expected to be a significant aspect of the operation
of the subway system, emissions of these air toxics were not evaluated.
To protect human health and the environment, the MOE has established maximum allowable exposure
limits for NO2, CO, SPM and dustfall. The criteria for NO2, CO, dustfall and SPM are specified in the
recently enacted Ontario Regulation (O.Reg. 419/05) and/or in the Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria
(AAQC). Currently, no provincial standard or criterion is available for PM2.5 or NO. Recognition of
potential health impacts from PM2.5 has resulted in the enactment of Canada-wide standards (CWS) for
this size fraction that will take effect in 2010. PM2.5 emanating from vehicle exhaust may have more
serious health effects than ordinary dust because of both the size and chemical composition. Therefore,
the pollutants used for assessing the impact to air quality were CO, NO2 and PM2.5.
The existing ambient air quality conditions for the project area are based on the most recently available
data published by the MOE, Air Quality Report (2007) from the closest monitoring stations to the project
area for which data was available. The closest monitoring station which provided NO2 and PM2.5 is the
Toronto North Station located on Hendon Avenue, near Yonge Street and Finch Avenue. Data for CO
concentrations are based on the measurements at the Toronto Downtown Station. A review of data for the
project area indicates that CO and NO2 concentrations are well below the Ontario AAQC. Ambient
PM2.5 concentrations, at the 90th percentile level are at 57% of the proposed federal standard that will
come into effect in 2010. However, maximum PM2.5 concentrations have exceeded the proposed limit on
seven occasions.
The concentrations of air pollutants from vehicular emissions due to the Undertaking were predicted by
conducting mathematical modeling using US EPA CAL3QHC model for intersections, with fleet
averaged emission factors for the projected traffic volume for the year 2021, calculated using the Mobile
6.2C emission factor model. A 2021 horizon year was selected to reflect at most ten years of construction
as well as several years of operation. Conservative meteorological conditions that generate worst-case
pollutant concentrations were used.
Two scenarios were selected for the detailed assessment of local traffic impacts at the Steeles,
Langstaff/Longbridge and Richmond Hill Centre Station areas:
i.
The “do nothing” scenario, which takes into account the projected traffic volume for 2021
without the proposed transit development (also referred to as the “Future No-Build” or “Future
Background”); and
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
v.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
ii. The “Future Build”, which takes into account the projected traffic volume for 2021 and new trips
generated from the operation of the subway, parking facilities and bus terminals assuming that
construction is completed before 2021.
Modeling for the Future No-Build Scenario was performed at the existing traffic intersections based on
projected traffic increases. Modeling for the Future Build Scenario was based on the projected traffic
increase plus traffic accessing the station, vehicles idling in the passenger pick-up/drop-off (PPUDO)
areas and parking facilities, and idling buses providing public transit links at the on-site bus terminals.
Background pollutant concentrations were included in the modeling results for both the Future No-Build
and Future Build Scenarios. No attempt was made to predict changes to the background concentrations in
2021.
Some of the intersections within the area have Level of Service (LOS) designations of C or better and
thus do not require modeling. This study focused on worst case locations or hot spots within the subway
station areas. For the Steeles Station area, these hot spots were determined to be:
i.
One intersection with LOS designation F (Yonge/Steeles).
ii. One bus terminal facility and associated commuter PPUDO areas.
Similar locations at the Langstaff/Longbridge Station area were determined to be:
i.
One intersection with LOS designation C (Yonge/Langstaff).
ii. One parking facility and associated commuter PPUDO area.
For the Richmond Hill Centre Station area, the hot spots were determined to be:
i.
One intersection with LOS designation C (Yonge/Garden).
ii. One bus terminal facility and associated commuter PPUDO area.
Yonge / Langstaff is included in this study because it is the closest signalized intersection to the proposed
Langstaff/Longbridge Subway Station, and is adjacent to the proposed large parking and PPUDO
facilities in the Build Scenario, thus making it a potential hot spot intersection for modeling purposes,
especially in the Future-Build Scenario. . Yonge / Garden is included due to the presence of a stacked bus
terminal in its vicinity in the Build Scenario makes it a potential hot spot intersection for modeling
purposes, especially in the Future-Build Scenario.
A comparison of the predicted maximum pollutant concentrations as a percentage of the applicable
criteria for PM2.5, CO and NO2 of all the model runs based on the worst-case conditions discussed above
are presented below for the locations near the three subway stations at Steeles, Langstaff/Longbridge and
Richmond Hill Centre. The incremental change is the increase in pollutant concentrations from Future
No-Build to Future Build, which is considered to be directly attributable to the Undertaking.
The predicted maximum concentrations and their locations for the modeled pollutants are presented
below assuming that the background concentrations at the 90th percentile remain the same in 2021 as they
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
vi.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
are presently. Since background concentrations represent the largest source of contaminants in the case of
PM2.5, changes in background levels may have a significant effect on PM2.5 concentrations at the local
level.
•
•
•
•
The predicted maximum CO concentration will reach 25% of the criteria (at the
Langstaff/Longbridge Station area under the Future Build Scenario) with an incremental change
of 4% over the No-Build Scenario.
The predicted maximum PM2.5 concentration will reach 39% of the criteria (at the Steeles
Station area under the Future Build Scenario) with an incremental change of 7% over the NoBuild Scenario.
The predicted Maximum NO2 concentration may reach 65% of the criteria if it is assumed that
all NOx emissions are emitted in the form of NO2 (at the Steeles area under the Future Build
Scenario), with an incremental change of 19% over the No-Build Scenario. This is a conservative
assumption. A corresponding value of 46% of the criteria with an incremental change of 12%
over the No-Build Scenario resulting from the application of the Ambient Ratio Conversion
Method (ARM) would be more realistic.
The change in pollutant concentrations from Future No-Build to Future Build will likely not
exceed 19% even at the local level during peak hour traffic, in spite of a forecasted increase in
traffic volume of 25% compared with the No-Build Scenario.
In general, results from modeling CO, NO2 and PM2.5 at the selected locations, indicate that the
operation of the expanded Yonge Subway is not likely to have a significant impact on air quality at the
local level.
A Noise and Vibration Impact Study has been completed for the Transit Project and is available under
separate cover.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
vii.
Project: 33015719
1.0
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
INTRODUCTION
The Regional Municipality of York, in partnership with York Region Rapid Transit Corporation, initiated
a Transit Project Assessment to determine the best alignment and station locations for a future subway
extension from the Finch Station to the proposed northern terminus at the Richmond Hill Centre
(Highway 7 and Yonge). As part of this study, an investigation of potential impacts to air quality,
including mitigation strategies was conducted by considering two scenarios, with and without the subway
extension (Future No-build and Future Build).
With the subway in place, trips currently made by automobile, can be made by transit, hence the overall
impact of the Yonge Subway Extension on a regional scale, will be good. A new report out from the
Victoria Transport Policy Institute (Todd Litman, 2005) that evaluates rail transit benefits, based on a
comprehensive analysis of transportation system performance in US cities, finds that cities with larger,
well-established rail systems have significantly higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per
capita vehicle ownership and mileage, less traffic congestion, lower traffic death rates, higher energy
conservation, and higher emissions reduction.
Future development around the proposed stations is likely to be more transit-oriented, which reduces the
rate of growth of automobile traffic. However localized areas of air quality degradation could occur from
the subway extension where stations with commuter parking and bus terminal facilities are proposed. This
can lead to increased localized traffic and emissions from both free flowing and idling traffic to drop-off
areas, parking facilities as well as bus terminals providing public transit links.
It should be noted that an air quality impact assessment was conducted by URS (2006) as part of an
earlier EA for the extension of the Spadina Subway from Downsview Station to Steeles West Station.
This assessment showed that predicted air quality impacts did not exceed criteria existing at the time of
the study. Moreover, an air quality impact assessment conducted by Rowan, Williams, Davies and Irwin
(1992) as part of another EA for the extension of the Spadina Subway with the line going even further and
looping back to Yonge Street and Finch Avenue, parallel to Steeles Avenue also showed that predicted air
quality impacts did not exceed criteria existing at the time of that study.
It is noted that a Noise and Vibration Impact Study has been completed for the Yonge Subway Extension
Transit Project and is available under separate cover.
2.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The study area is roughly bounded by Finch Avenue (south), Bathurst Street (west), Bayview Avenue
(east) and Carrville Road/16th Avenue (north). As part of the Yonge Subway Extension from Finch
Station to Richmond Hill Center Terminal, the construction of six (6) subway stations and affiliated
parking is proposed.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 2.0
Proposed Subway Station Descriptions
Commuter
Parking
Bus Terminal
Potential for
changes in
localized air
quality
PPUDO
Cummer/Drewry
No
No
No
No
Steeles
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Clark
No
No
No
No
Royal Orchard
No
No
No
No
Langstaff/Longbridge
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Richmond Hill Centre
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Proposed Station
A plan showing the locations of these proposed subway stations is provided in an Exhibit Recommended Undertaking, in the main Environmental Project Report for the Yonge Subway Extension.
3.0
EXISTING AIR QUALITY ENVIRONMENT
3.1
Ambient Air Quality Criteria
Air pollutants associated directly with vehicular traffic are carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides
(NOx), with two principal components, nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and to a lesser
extent particulate matter (PM) denoted by size fractions as PM10 and PM2.5 included in the Suspended
Particulate Matter (SPM) designation. Five other pollutants, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde and acrolein, collectively known as Air Toxics, have also been related to emissions from
vehicles, particularly the heavy duty diesel vehicle (HDDV) category. As HDDV’s are not likely to be a
major factor in a public transit Undertaking, the pollutants used for assessing the impact to air quality
were determined to be CO, NOx, and PM2.5.
The relevant criteria to evaluate NO2 and CO concentrations as well as SPM are found in the Ontario
Ambient Air Quality Criteria (Ontario AAQC) carried forward into the newly enacted Regulation, O.
Reg. 419/05. Currently, no provincial standard or criterion is available for PM2.5 or NO. Recognition of
health impacts from PM2.5 has resulted in the enactment of Canada-wide standards (CWS) for this size
fraction. The CWS PM2.5 standard will come into effect in 2010. PM2.5 emanating from vehicle exhaust
may have more serious health effects than ordinary dust because of both the size and chemical
composition. PM2.5 can travel deep into the pulmonary system transporting noxious chemicals such as
benzene.
3.2
Metropolitan Toronto Air Quality
The existing ambient air quality conditions for the project area are based on the most recent
measurements (2007) from the closest monitoring stations to the project area for which data was
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
2.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
available. The closest monitoring station to the project area is the Toronto North station located on
Hendon Avenue, near Yonge Street and Finch Avenue. According to the most recent publicly available
report entitled “Air Quality in Ontario 2007” (MOE, 2007), the pollutants relevant to this study that are
monitored at this location are NO2 and PM2.5. Data used to represent CO concentrations consist of the
2007 measurements at the Toronto Downtown station located approximately 15 kilometres south of the
project area.
3.2.1
MOE Monitoring Station Results
Table 3.2-1 presents the applicable AAQC and CWS, along with the 2007 measurements at the Toronto
North or Toronto Downtown stations.
Table 3.2-1
Ambient Air Quality Summary (2007)
Pollutants (Unit)
Average
Time
Criteria (1)
90th
Percentile (4)
Maximum
Concentrations
Number of
Times Above
Criteria
PM2.5 (µg/m3) (2)
24-hour
30
18
40 (24h)
7
Suspended
Particulate Matter
(<44 µm) (µg/m3)
24-hour
100
NA
NA
NA
NO2 (ppb) (2)
1-hour
200
33
63
0
24-hour
100
NA
43
0
1-hour
30
0.36
1.70
0
8-hour
13
NA
1.08
0
1-hour
NS
53
349
NA
24-hour
NS
NA
100
NA
CO (ppm) (3)
NOx (ppb) (2)
Notes: (1) The criterion for PM2.5 is the federal standard published in CWS for PM and Ozone adopted by the
Canadian Council of Ministers (July, 2000). (2) The pollutant measured at the Toronto North station. (3) The pollutant
measured at the Toronto Downtown station. (4) If the 90th percentile value is 60 ppb, then 90 percent of the data are
equal to or below 60 ppb. NA - Not Available. NS - No Standard.
3.2.2
Background Concentrations
The 90th percentile level was selected to represent the background concentration. This is considered a very
conservative input value for modeling, and was deemed suitable by the MOE as confirmed by discussions
during previous similar project work (URS, 2006) with Dr. Robert Bloxam, Senior Leader, Modeling,
Environmental Modeling and Data Analysis Branch. To avoid interannual variability when assessing the
air quality impacts in the project areas, the background concentrations used in modeling were average
values of the 90th percentile concentrations over a five-year period (2003 – 2007). The calculated
background concentrations were 35.20 ppb, 0.54 ppm and 19.20 µg/m3 respectively for NO2, CO and
PM2.5. It is therefore concluded that the background concentrations in the Study Area are well below the
Ontario AAQC for CO and NO2, and the CWS PM2.5.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
3.
Project: 33015719
3.3
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Air Quality in the Vicinity of the Yonge Subway Extension
As shown in Table 3.2-1, in the 2007 MOE Air Quality Report, both the 1-hour and 24-hour 2007 NO2
levels, as well as the 1-hour and 8-hour 2007 levels for CO were well below the applicable criteria. The
measured 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations in 2007 were at 60 percent of the proposed CWS, based on the
90th percentile concentration. It is noted however, that the PM2.5 maximum concentration exceeded the
criteria seven times.
3.4
Climatology
3.4.1
Dispersion Climatology
The main meteorological parameters affecting dispersion of pollutants are wind speed and direction,
stability of the atmosphere, and mixing height. The rate of dilution and trajectory of a polluted air parcel
is determined by wind speed and direction. Atmospheric stability determines the rate at which dilution
occurs through turbulent diffusion in the horizontal and vertical directions. Both mechanical and buoyant
processes lead to turbulent diffusion. The mixing height sets the upper limit to the atmospheric layer
within which dispersion of pollutants can occur, and defines the depth of the atmosphere that is
convectively unstable. The US EPA intersection modeling software provides an opportunity to either use
actual meteorological data for wind speed, stability and mixing height in the CAL3QHCR version or a
user defined worst-case scenario in the CAL3QHC version. Further analysis relating to selection of
parameters in order to determine the appropriate choice of software for this study is detailed below.
3.4.2
Wind Climate
Dispersion is greatest with strong winds and least with light winds. Canadian climate normals for the
period 1971 to 2000 are available from Environment Canada (EC, 2005) for Toronto Lester B. Pearson
International Airport (LBPIA). Average wind speeds range from 11.2 km/h in the height of summer
(August) to 17.8 km/h on average in January. However, to model the worst-case scenario, a wind speed of
3.6 km/h (1 m/s) is typically chosen as a default value. The most frequent wind direction is from the
Northwest (NW), except in the Fall when it veers SW. For dispersion modeling, the worst case is
identified by modeling wind directions through all 360 degrees in 10o increments.
3.4.3
Atmospheric Stability
For diffusion studies, atmospheric stability is classified into several categories, ranging from A to F. Class
D refers to neutral stability, classes E to F indicate stable conditions, while classes A through C denote
unstable atmospheric conditions. In a neutrally stable atmosphere, mechanical turbulence generated by the
surface roughness and wind dominate over buoyancy efforts generated by heating or cooling of the air. In
a convective or unstable atmosphere, positive buoyancy effects dominate over mechanical turbulence and
cause air to rise rapidly enhancing further turbulence and therefore, accelerated diffusion of pollutants.
Because of the heat generated in urban settings, the formation of stability class F is rare. Hence, for worst
case prediction of dispersion, a stability class of E or D is appropriate. To represent the worst-case, a
stability class of E was chosen in this study.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
4.
Project: 33015719
3.4.4
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Mixing Height
The mixing height is increased by turbulent mixing generated from rising hot air. Therefore, the mixing
height is generally greater during summer than in winter and on a daily basis, the maximum height tends
to occur when solar heating is at its peak and the atmosphere is highly convective. The lowest average
heights occur under very light wind conditions during the early morning hours as the surface starts to
warm by solar heating. In the 1992 Air Quality Assessment conducted by RWDI, the mixing height was
derived using the closest publicly available dataset obtained from Buffalo, New York airport. It ranged
from 2,100 m on a summer afternoon to 450 m on a summer morning. As reported in Table B-11 (RWDI,
1992), the average annual mixing height for the analyzed period from 1984 to 1987 was 298 m for wind
speeds of 0-7 km/h, compared to a winter value of 199 m. Analysis of a more recent data set from 1996 to
2000 for Buffalo available at the MOE website, (www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/air/regulations/metdata),
indicated that for wind speeds of 0-7 km/h the mixing height averaged closer to 1,000 m. According to the
guideline for the CAL3QHC model used for intersection modeling, the mixing height has minimal effect
until the value is well below 100 m. By default a mixing height of 1,000 m is used in modeling in the
absence of site-specific data. For modeling purposes, RWDI used 300 m. Results obtained from a
sensitivity analysis for mixing heights, conducted by URS for the Spadina Subway Extension Air Quality
Impact Assessment (URS, 2006), where the input value was varied from 1,500 m to 5 m for the Finch
West Station, indicated that the model became sensitive to the input values only below 100 m. The more
conservative value of 300 m was selected in keeping with the previous 1992 and 2006 assessments, even
though the average mixing height is closer to the default value of 1,000 m. In the Spadina Subway
Extension air quality study, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by URS using CAL3QHCR with real
meteorological data input for the period 1996 to 2000 and compared to results obtained with CAL3QHC
based on a user defined worst-case scenario for the Finch West Station. Maximum concentrations
obtained with CAL3QHC were higher than those from CAL3QHCR, hence the CAL3QHC software
version was chosen. Based on these results, CAL3QHC also was chosen for this study.
4.0
PREDICTING THE EFFECTS OF THE UNDERTAKING
4.1
Approach to Effect Prediction
The effects of the undertaking on the atmospheric environment were predicted using a semi quantitative
assessment for construction impacts and mathematical modeling techniques for vehicular traffic (Mobile
6.2C and CAL3QHC). The predicted impacts were compared to applicable criteria. Mobile 6.2C, the
Canadianized version of the US EPA Mobile 6.2, calculates emission factors for a fleet of vehicles, which
are used in the US EPA CAL3QHC model to assess dispersed pollutant concentrations at selected
receptors. In addition, the impact of the undertaking was determined by subtracting the concentration of
applicable pollutants in the No-Build Scenario from the Build-Scenario.
4.2
Criteria and Standards
4.2.1
Air Quality Standards and Criteria for Construction
Emissions from construction and demolition activities are covered by Regulation 419/05, Section 37. The
emission (contaminant) of concern is primarily fugitive dust. The Regulation states that:
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
5.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
“ no person shall (a) construct, alter, demolish, drill, blast, crush or screen anything or cause or
permit the construction, alteration, demolition, drilling, blasting, crushing or screening of
anything so that a contaminant is carried beyond the limits of the property…,
to an extent or degree greater than that which would result if every step necessary to control the
emission of the contaminant were implemented”.
The MOE expects construction operations to meet Regulation 419/05 requirements. In order to do so, the
proponent would be expected to comply with applicable provincial standards related to dust emissions:
SPM and dustfall promulgated as ½ hour Point of Impingement (POI) standards. The POI limit for SPM
and dustfall are 100 µg/m3 and 8,000 µg/m3, respectively.
In addition to the above, MOE’s NPC-115 noise guideline for construction equipment shall be
considered. However, as previously noted, a Noise and Vibration Impact Study has been completed for
the Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project and is available under separate cover.
4.2.2
Air Quality Standards and Criteria for Vehicular Emissions
Applicable air quality standards and criteria are summarized in Table 3.2-1 and discussed in Section 3.2.
4.3
Construction Impacts
Activities associated with the development of the Yonge Subway Extension may include demolition of
existing structures and surfaces, and construction of new structures and surfaces. Both of these activities
may be sources of emissions of total suspended particulate matter (TSP), commonly referred to as dust.
Since these sources are not discharged from a specific source or exhaust stack, they are referred to as
fugitive dust sources.
4.3.1
Sources of Fugitive Dust
Specific sources of fugitive dust during demolition activities may include:
•
•
•
•
•
Destruction by explosion or wrecking ball,
Handling and transfer systems of building material (bulldozing, stockpiling, truck loading),
Wind erosion from exposed debris piles and exposed area,
Vehicular travel on unpaved area, and
Mud and dirt carry-out onto paved surfaces.
Specific sources of fugitive dust during construction activities may include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Site preparation (excavation, drilling, blasting),
Storage piles,
Wind erosion from material piles and exposed work areas,
Handling and transfer systems of building material,
Vehicular travel on unpaved area (prior to and during road construction),
Road surfaces, and
Fabrication processes.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
6.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Although TSP emissions from these sources typically occur over short periods of time, they may have a
substantial temporary impact on local air quality, especially during dry conditions and/or high wind speed
events.
The approach to estimating emissions from construction sites is based on the emission rate developed by
the US EPA of 2.7 tonnes per hectare of construction area per month of activity. Further assumptions are
used to estimate a month of activity, which is generally taken to be 5 working days per week and 8 hours
per day, leading to a dust emission rate of 4.7 g/s/ha, assuming a month is 160 hours. Based on the above,
the previous EAs for the study area reported TSP concentrations for two typical scenarios: one (1) hectare
construction site, (2) a 30-m wide strip representing a cut and cover area. As the assumptions and
modeling approach for this undertaking would be the same as in the previous EAs, leading to identical
results, the effort was not duplicated in this study.
4.3.2
Survey of Sensitive Areas
The areas of construction will be situated within developed residential and commercial area of northwest
Toronto and southern York Region. At most of the construction areas, these residential and commercial
areas, as well as pedestrian areas such as sidewalks, will border the construction sites. For this reason,
dust mitigation procedures must be in place in order to minimize the impact to neighboring developments
and pedestrian areas. These measures are further discussed in Section 5.2.2.
4.4
Vehicle Exhaust Impact Prediction
4.4.1
Scenarios Examined
The following two scenarios were selected for the detailed assessment of local traffic.
i.
2021 traffic projections with no transit development (Future Background or Future No-Build).
ii. 2021 traffic projections with subway, parking lots, PPUDOs and bus stations in place (Future
Build).
A 2021 development horizon was utilized to assess future traffic conditions. It is expected that the
planning process and construction of the proposed TTC Yonge Subway Extension could be completed
within the next ten (10) years. For the purpose of the traffic assessment, a 2021 horizon year was selected
to reflect this potential construction, as well as several years of operation. It is acknowledged that 2021 is
a very long-term horizon period, and is atypical for an analysis of this nature. Notwithstanding, the year
2021 has been selected to reflect conditions several years after subway construction. The three areas
which will be most influenced by the subway extension are those stations with bus terminals and
commuter parking facilities resulting in increased localized traffic to drop-off areas, parking facilities as
well as bus terminals providing public transit links. These locations are:
i.
Yonge/Steeles in the vicinity of the proposed Steeles Station.
ii. Yonge/Langstaff in the vicinity of the proposed Langstaff/Longbridge Station.
iii. Richmond Hill Centre in the vicinity of Yonge and Highway 7.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
7.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
A bus loop with a maximum of fifteen (15) buses at peak hour, in the Build Scenario, is proposed at the
Cummer/Drewry station location. Since vehicular traffic volumes would be low at the
Cummer/Drewry/Yonge intersection and bus idling would not happen at the location, it was anticipated
that the impact of the Cummer/Drewry station area on air quality would be minimal. Therefore, that area
was not included in the air quality assessment.
Modeled locations are shown in Figures 4.4.1-1, 4.4.1-2 and 4.4.1-3.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
8.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Figure 4.4.1-1
Yonge Subway Station Location
9.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Figure 4.4.1-2
Langstaff/Longbridge Subway Station Location
10.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Figure 4.4.1-3
Richmond Hill Centre Subway Station Location
11.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Some of the intersections within the area have Level of Service (LOS) designations of C or better and
thus do not require modeling. This study focused on worst case locations or “hot spots” within the
subway station areas. For the Steeles Station area, these hot spots were determined to be:
i.
One intersection with LOS designation F (Yonge/Steeles).
ii. One bus terminal facility and associated commuter PPUDO areas.
For the Langstaff/Longbridge Station, modeling was conducted for:
i.
One intersection with LOS designation C (Yonge/Langstaff).
ii. One parking facility and associated commuter PPUDO area.
For the Richmond Hill Centre Station area, modeling was conducted for:
iii. One intersection with LOS designation C (Yonge/Garden).
iv. One bus terminal facility and associated commuter PPUDO area.
, Yonge / Langstaff is included in this study because it is the closest signalized intersection to the
proposed Langstaff/Longbridge Subway Station, and is adjacent to the proposed parking and PPUDO
facilities in the Build Scenario, thus making it a potential hot spot intersection for modeling purposes,
especially in the Future-Build Scenario. Yonge / Garden is included due to the presence of a stacked bus
terminal in its vicinity in the Build Scenario makes it a potential hot spot intersection for modeling
purposes, especially in the Future-Build Scenario.
In all three areas, the impacted intersections and the future bus terminal and associated commuter
parking/PPUDO facilities were modeled as a single area since the proposed locations of these components
are sufficiently close together.
4.4.2
Traffic Emissions Estimation and Background Pollutant Levels
The MOBILE6.2C model was used to estimate emission factors for CO, PM2.5, and NOx. MOBILE6.2,
the latest version of the MOBILE model, was designed by the US EPA to address a wide variety of air
pollution modeling needs (US EPA, 2003). MOBILE6.2 generates emission factors for a fleet of vehicles
as a function of the mix and age of the fleet, calendar year, ambient temperature, speed, fuel
characteristics, and presence or absence of an inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. All of these
factors are considered in developing composite mobile source emission factors. MOBILE6.2 can also
generate sector specific emission factors as the composite emission factor cannot be used in special
situations such as car parking facilities or bus terminals.
MOBILE6.2C developed by Environmental Canada (EC, 2005) is the Canadian version of the
MOBILE6.2 model and was modified to more accurately reflect Canadian conditions. MOBILE6.2C has
the exact same input data requirements as MOBILE6.2.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
12.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4.4.2.1 MOBILE 6.2C Input Parameters
Model input data for the subject analyses were prepared based on a sample input file obtained from the
MOE (2005) and the “MOBILE6.2C Canadian Supplemental Users’ Guide” (EC, 2003). The “User’s
Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission Factor Model” developed by the US
EPA was also used for model input preparation. The local vehicle age distribution data and mileage
accumulation rates obtained from the MOE (2005) were used as input to MOBILE6.2C. The
MOBILE6.2C model default vehicle mix data were used in the emission factor modeling analyses, and
these data are presented in Table 4.4.2.1.1.
Table 4.4.2.1.1
Vehicle Mix Data
Vehicle Type
Percent of Total
Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles (LDGV)
26.70%
Light-Duty Gasoline Trucks 1 and 2 (LDGT12)
42.10%
Light-Duty Gasoline Trucks 3 and 4 (LDGT34)
13.94%
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Vehicles (HDGV)
3.91%
Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles (LDDV)
0.27%
Light-Duty Diesel Trucks (LDDT)
1.26%
Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles (HDDV)
11.46%
Motorcycles (MC)
0.36%
Total
100%
According to the U.S. EPA User’s Guide, the model allows the choice of January 1 or July 1 as
evaluation months in the model runs (U.S. EPA, 2003). The daily minimum and maximum temperatures
corresponding to these two months recommended by the MOE (MOE, 2005) were selected to estimate
emission factors for the subject air pollutants. In addition, the fuel Reid vapor pressure (RVP) values for
January and July recommended by the MOE were used. The temperature data and RVP values used in the
modeling runs are presented in Table 4.4.2.1.2. Additional inputs into the MOBILE6.2C are also
presented in Table 4.4.2.1.2. For variables not specifically identified in Table 4.4.2.1.2, MOBILE6.2C
default values were used.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
13.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 4.4.2.1.2
MOBILE6.2C Input Parameters
Input Information
Ambient Temperature
Vehicle Speed
Province
Operating Year (Horizon Year)
Reid Vapor Pressure
Vehicle Operating Mode
Value and Source
January Minimum: 25.3 oF (-3.7 oC)
January Maximum: 36.9 oF (2.7 oC)
July Minimum: 64.9 oF (18.3 oC)
July Maximum: 86.2 oF (30.1 oC)
2.5 miles per hour (4 km/h)
5.0 miles per hour (8 km/h)
10.0 miles per hour (16 km/h)
18.6 miles per hour (30 km/h)
Ontario
2021
January RVP: 14.7 psi (101.3 kPa)
July RVP: 8.9 psi (61.3 kPa)
Model default values
100% Cold Start
The MOBILE6.2C model does not directly generate composite vehicle idling emission rates. The
composite idling emission rates were derived based on the instructions provided in the US EPA technical
guidance (US EPA, 2002). MOBILE6.2C was first run using an average speed distribution that assigns all
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to the 2.5 miles per hour (mph) average speed bin and the arterial/collector
driving cycle set. The resulting emission rate (in grams per mile) is multiplied by the average speed (2.5
mph) to give the idling emission rate (in grams per hour), as expressed below:
Idling emission rate = Emissions at 2.5 mph * Average speed (2.5 mph).
MOBILE 6.2C only relies on the standard Federal Test Procedure (FTP) for PM emissions. Therefore,
there is no temperature and speed correction and consequently, PM emission factors remain unchanged
between the 100% cold-start and the default operating modes.
The higher of the estimated air pollutant emission factors from either January or July were selected based
on traffic speed at modeled locations as input to the subsequent CAL3QHC dispersion modeling analyses
to estimate the maximum air pollutant concentrations. The estimated vehicle emission factors for CO,
NOx, and PM2.5 are provided in Tables 4.4.2.1.3 to 4.4.2.1.5, respectively. Idling emission factors are
provided in Tables 4.4.2.1.3A to 4.4.2.1.5A. MOBILE6.2C modeling input and output files are included
in Appendix E.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
14.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 4.4.3.1.3
Estimated Composite CO Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
2.5 mph
Model Default Data
28.190
3.264
22.459
5.0 mph
Model Default Data
18.860
2.664
15.583
10.0 mph
Model Default Data
14.420
1.837
11.905
18.6 mph
Model Default Data
12.520
1.072
10.070
2.5 mph
100% Cold Start
35.900
3.264
28.424
5.0 mph
100% Cold Start
26.580
2.664
21.549
10.0 mph
100% Cold Start
22.140
1.837
17.871
18.6 mph
100% Cold Start
20.230
1.072
16.036
Table 4.4.3.1.3A
Estimated Idling CO Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
Idling
Model Default Data
70.475
8.160
56.148
Idling
100% Cold Start
89.750
8.160
71.060
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
15.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 4.4.3.1.4
Estimated Composite NOx Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
2.5 mph
Model Default Data
0.435
4.769
0.540
5.0 mph
Model Default Data
0.372
4.278
0.481
10.0 mph
Model Default Data
0.306
3.535
0.400
18.6 mph
Model Default Data
0.247
2.761
0.326
2.5 mph
100% Cold Start
0.452
4.769
0.555
5.0 mph
100% Cold Start
0.390
4.278
0.496
10.0 mph
100% Cold Start
0.324
3.535
0.415
18.6 mph
100% Cold Start
0.265
2.761
0.341
Table 4.4.3.1.4A
Estimated Idling NOx Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
Idling
Model Default Data
1.088
11.923
1.350
Idling
100% Cold Start
1.130
11.923
1.388
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
16.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 4.4.3.1.5
Estimated Composite PM2.5 Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
2.5 mph
Model Default Data
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
5.0 mph
Model Default Data
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
10.0 mph
Model Default Data
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
18.6 mph
Model Default Data
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
2.5 mph
100% Cold Start
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
5.0 mph
100% Cold Start
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
10.0 mph
100% Cold Start
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
18.6 mph
100% Cold Start
0.0112
0.0906
0.0164
Table 4.4.3.1.5A
Estimated Idling PM2.5 Emission Factors
Speeds
Operating Conditions
4.4.3
Passenger Cars
(g/mile)
Diesel Buses
(g/mile)
All Vehicles
(g/mile)
Idling
Model Default Data
0.0280
0.2265
0.0410
Idling
100% Cold Start
0.0280
0.2265
0.0410
Dispersion Modeling
4.4.3.1 Traffic Volumes and Intersection Light Cycles
The representative existing traffic volumes for the Steeles, Langstaff/Longbridge and Richmond Hill
Center areas’ intersections were obtained from the City of Toronto and Region of York. The analysis of
the data indicated that the PM peak-hour represented the worst-case in terms of LOS and number of trips
generated. Hence the total delay time for the PM peak hour traffic exceeded that of the AM peak hour
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
17.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
values, indicating greater potential for queuing and resulting idling emissions. Thus, the PM peak hour
was selected to represent the worst-case scenario for all locations and all scenarios.
The Future Background PM peak-hour traffic volumes were estimated using an annual growth rate of 2%
for ten (10) years. The new trips generated at the selected intersections due to the Undertaking were
determined by applying the maximum worst-case increase of 25% as a percentage of Future Background
traffic obtained from the Traffic Impact Study, TTC Spadina Subway Extension (URS, 2006).
The existing Yonge/Steeles, Yonge/Langstaff and Yonge/Garden intersections signal times were obtained
from the City of Toronto and Region of York and are presented in Appendix F of this report. These times
also were used for all the scenarios.
4.4.3.2 Receptor and Roadway Coordinates
Receptor locations and street coordinates for the three study areas were selected through detailed
evaluation of the station and roadway plans. Receptor locations were placed 1.8 m above grade at
identified locations. Also grids of receptor locations were created as part of the modeling process.
4.4.3.3 Surface Roughness
Surface roughness is an evaluation of the profile of a surface which affects the local turbulence of the air
flow and therefore influences the spread of a pollutant plume from a source. The roughness height is
proportional to the physical dimensions of the obstacles to air flow. As the intersections are located in an
urban area, the corresponding value of 321 cm was selected for the surface roughness input parameter in
this study.
4.4.3.4 Meteorological Conditions
The selection of meteorological inputs into the CAL3QHC dispersion model presented in the input matrix
below was discussed in detail in Section 3.4. These conditions represent meteorological assumptions that
are considered to be conservative and will generate worst-case pollutant concentrations.
Table 4.4.3.4
Input Matrix for CAL3QHC
One-hour Meteorological Conditions
Parameter
CO, NOx, PM2.5
Wind Speed
1.0 m/s
Stability Class
E
Mixing Height (m)
300
Background Concentrations
(90th percentile)
CO (0.51 ppm), NOx (59 ppb), NO2 (34 ppb); PM2.5 (17µg/m3)
Surface Roughness (cm)
321
Wind Direction
Worst case by applying 10o increments to a full directional circle (360o)
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
18.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 4.4.3.4
Input Matrix for CAL3QHC
(Continued)
One-hour Meteorological Conditions
Link Type
At grade or bridge (at Steeles and Richmond Hill Bus Terminal)
Link Height (m)
0 (at grade); 6 m at Bridge
Mixing Zone Width (m)
Lane width + 3 m on either side of regular moving links (Queue link mixing
zone width = lane width)
Settling velocity* for PM 2.5
0.5 cm/s
Deposition velocity* for PM 2.5
0.1 cm/s
* From Richard Countess et al., (2001), “Methodology for estimating fugitive windblown and mechanically resuspended road
dust emissions applicable for Regional Scale Air Quality Modeling”, Report prepared for the Western Governors Association
as referenced in the Ontario Ministry of Transportation Air quality Impact Assessment for the QEW widening report, July
2004.
4.4.4
Prediction of Worst-Case Pollutant Levels
Two scenarios (2021 Build, 2021 No-Build) were modeled for the selected alternatives using the US EPA
CAL3QHC software package for intersections, bus terminals and parking lots selected at the Steeles,
Langstaff/Longbridge and Richmond Hill Centre areas. The total delay time for the PM peak-hour traffic
exceeded that of the AM peak-hour values, indicating greater potential for queuing and resulting idling
emissions, and hence the PM peak-hour was selected to represent the worst-case scenario for all locations
as discussed in Section 4.4.3.1. PM peak-hour traffic volumes and intersection signal light cycles were
used in all instances. Table 4.4.4 summarizes the model runs carried out for the Undertaking for the
intersections near each of the three station areas. A total of eighteen (18) model runs were performed.
Table 4.4.4
Intersection Model Runs
Run
Number
Scenario
Contaminant
Averaging
Time
Predicted Averaging
Time
Traffic Information
1
Future Background
NOx
1 hour
1-hr NOx; 24-hr NOx
PM Future Background
2
Future Background
CO
1 hour
1-hr CO; 8-hr CO
PM Future Background
3
Future Background
PM2.5
1 hour
24-hr PM2.5
PM Future Background
4
Future Build
NOx
1 hour
1-hr NOx; 24-hr NOx
PM Future Total
5
Future Build
CO
1 hour
1-hr CO; 8-hr CO
PM Future Total
6
Future Build
PM2.5
1 hour
24-hr PM2.5
PM Future Total
Discrete receptors were located at the existing bus stands, drop-off area and known nearby residential
properties. Also grid receptors were modeled based on a tier system of grids (100 m grid for the entire
study area and approximately 15 m at the intersections). The maximum receptor concentrations from the
1-hour model runs were prorated to the 8-hr peak average and 24-hour daily concentrations using
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
19.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
approved EPA persistence factors of 0.7 and 0.4, respectively (Guideline for modeling Carbon Monoxide
from Roadway Intersections, USEPA, 1992).
The commuter parking facilities were modeled assuming that the worst-case scenario was represented
during PM peak hour, when the predicted total traffic volume for 2021 emptied out during a 1-hour
period. Traffic speed in the free flow links within the car parking facility/PPUDO areas as well as in the
bypass lanes within bus terminals, was assumed to be 4 km/hr and 8 km/h respectively in order to model
the worst-case scenario using emission factors derived from Mobile 6.2C.
The current CAL3QHC model has no clear provision to model idling traffic such as cars in a parking
facilities prior to driving off and buses at bus-bays; hence this traffic was modeled as “pseudo-free flow
links” based on the queue link methodology described in the CAL3QHC guideline (p.14). A pseudo free
flow link is a link having emissions due to an idling vehicle, but simulated in the model as a moving (free
flow) vehicle. As the CAL3QHC model requires an emission factor in g/mile for free flow links, and
idling emission factors are in g/hour, the latter has to be converted to obtain the correct unit format as
illustrated below. In order to do so, an average length of 12.2 metres (0.0076 miles) per bus (TTC Design
Manual, Volume 2) and an average idling time of 4 minutes (0.067 hours) were used for the buses (per
email communication, dated December 12, 2005, from Bill Dawson, Service Planning Department,
Toronto Transit Commission). Given an idling emission factor of 8.160 g/hr for CO derived from Mobile
6.2C default settings (Table 4.4.3.1.3A), the “pseudo free flow link” emission factor = 8.160 g/hr x 0.067
hrs/0.0076miles = 71.76 g/mile.
Similar calculations were made to derive “pseudofree flow link” emission factors for passenger vehicles
starting up prior to driving off during the PM peak-hour from the car parking facilities. A time of 15
seconds and 100% cold-start emission factors were used for idling passenger vehicles. A speed of 4 kmph
was assumed for passenger vehicles exiting the parking facilities and corresponding 100% cold-start
emission factors at equivalent speeds were used as input parameters. As vehicles driving into PPUDO
areas tend to wait longer to pick-up passengers, an average time of 7 minutes was used to model idling
traffic at PPUDO areas. Mobile 6.2C default idling emission factors instead of 100% cold-start idling
emission factors were used for vehicles idling at PPUDOs as the drivers would not likely be switching off
engines while waiting to pick up passengers.
The ambient ratio method (ARM) was used to determine NO2 emissions from the modeled NOx
concentrations based on the mean ambient NO2 to NOx ratio of background concentrations averaged over
five years (2003 - 2007) listed in the Toronto Air Quality reports. The ratio was determined to be 0.6
(NO2 to NOx). In addition, the Ozone Limiting Method (OLM), Tier 1 screening method (OLM/ARM
Work Group, November 1997) was employed to determine worst-case NO2 concentrations, which
assumes that all NOx concentrations are equivalent to NO2.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
20.
Project: 33015719
5.0
RESULTS OF PREDICTION
5.1
Construction Effects
5.1.1
Suspended Particulate Matter Concentrations
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
As specific details for modeling emissions from construction sites are not available at this stage of the
Undertaking, modeling was not attempted. Historically, modeling based on simulated scenarios and
standard emission factors has predicted that the provincial standard for SPM would be exceeded up to a
distance of 475 m from a one-hectare construction site perimeter with construction activity occurring
approximately 160 hours per month, and that the provincial standard for dustfall would be exceeded up to
a distance of 200 m (RWDI, 1992). In order to meet the provincial standards, the control efficiency
needed would be 70% and 95%, respectively.
The MOE expects that construction operations will meet Regulation 419/05 requirements. For this reason,
a work plan should be required in the contract specifications to ensure that the required control measures
are carried out diligently.
5.1.2
Dust Mitigation Measures
Construction and demolition activities may result in TSP emissions exceeding applicable environmental
air quality standards around the construction site, particularly during stable atmospheric stability, dry
conditions and low wind speeds.
To reduce emission, a number of control measures are available, depending on the sources. A detailed
description of appropriate measures is provided in the document Best Practices for the Reduction of Air
Emissions From Construction and Demolition Activities, March, 2005 (BPREA), Prepared by Cheminfo
Services Inc. for Environment Canada.
For demolition activities, typical measures include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Minimize drop heights for debris,
Enclose chutes and cover bins when debris is allowed to fall,
Use fogging or misting systems in contained or enclosed places,
Include wind barriers, such as wind fences (or natural vegetation on long projects) to reduce wind
erosion,
Recognize windy conditions and reduce certain activities or apply additional dust suppressant,
Maintain a clean area by vacuuming or sweeping accumulations of debris,
Practices for loading debris,
Minimize the quantity and length of time debris is stored on site,
Control mud and dirt trackout onto public streets, and
Secure loads and cover haul trucks.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
21.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
During construction activities, similar control methods can be used as well as:
•
•
•
Conduct excavation and grading activities in phases, to minimize the extent of disturbed area
present and the length of time it is exposed.
Use barriers to minimize wind erosion, including snow fencing, natural vegetation left in strategic
places during clearing and material berming.
Implement surface improvements to unpaved road surfaces, including, paving as soon as
practical, and use of material with a low silt content.
Since construction activities are generally of short duration, the use of wet suppression and wind speed
reduction are generally the most common, efficient and cost effective approaches. However, other control
technologies are often used for specific situations. The efficiency of these control methods can vary
significantly.
The Western Regional Air Partnership’s (WRAP) Dust Emissions Joint Forum (DEJF) has prepared a
guidance manual, Fugitive Dust Handbook, that was adapted from Section 13.2.5 of EPA’s Compilation
of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42), January 1995. The manual relies primarily on US EPA AP-42
monitoring data, with additional references to alternative estimation and control methods adopted by state
and local control agencies in the WRAP region. The manual provides the following summary of several
control methods, for various sources.
Table 5.1.2
Efficiency of Dust Mitigation Measures
Water unpaved surfaces
Construction/Demolition
Materials Handling
Paved Roads
Unpaved Roads
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
10 – 74%
Limit on-site vehicle speed to 15 mph
57%
Apply dust suppressant to unpaved areas
84%
Prohibit activities during high winds
98%
Implement wet suppression
50 – 70%
Sweep streets
4 – 26%
Minimize trackout
40 – 80%
Remove deposits on road ASAP
>90%
Limit vehicle speed to 25 mph
44%
Apply water
10 – 74%
Apply dust suppressant
84%
Pave the surface
>90%
22.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 5.1.2
Efficiency of Dust Mitigation Measures
(Continued)
Plant trees or shrubs as a windbreak
Wind Erosion (agricultural,
open area, and storage piles)
25%
Create cross-wind ridges
24 – 93%
Erect artificial wind barriers
4 – 88%
Apply dust suppressant or gravel
84%
Revegetate; apply cover crop
90%
Water exposed area before high winds
90%
As noted above, the application of water can provide a significant reduction for a variety of sources.
Table 5: Guidance on Applying Water at Construction Sites, and Table 6: Guidance on Applying Dust
Suppressants/Stabilizers at Construction Sites, included in the BPREA provides specific instructions for
using wet suppression methods at construction/demolition sites and are reproduced above.
5.1.2.1 Response to and Control of Dust Problems
Studies referenced above on dust levels associated with construction/demolition activities have shown
that the maximum dust levels will be generated under stable atmospheric stability, dry conditions and low
wind speeds. To promote compliance with MOE’s criteria, the TTC Master Specifications requires that
contractors incorporate mitigation or control measures into construction activities. The MOE expects that
emission from construction operations comply with the O. Reg. 419/05 SPM criteria, therefore, control
measures articulated in the Controls and Methods Plan will need to be carried out diligently under
contractual specifications. Such measures include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Develop a comprehensive environmental Controls and Methods Plan of the whole process of dust
control.
Cover or wet down dry materials to prevent blowing dust and debris.
Prevent dust from blowing across the site and from leaving the site, in particular, frequently wet
paved and unpaved temporary roads and excavated areas.
Comply with provincial ordinances and Engineer's requirements regarding minimizing of dust
and airborne pollution.
Wash down the streets within the work site on a weekly basis and as additionally directed by the
Engineer.
Securely cover excavated material being removed from the site and all fill materials being
delivered to the site to prevent blowing of dust or fines into the streets and haul routes.
Application of calcium chloride shall be kept to minimum and shall be restricted to vehicle rightof-way. In close proximity to watercourses, frequent applications of water shall be the preferred
method. Obtain the Engineer's approval before chemicals for dust control are used.
These mitigation measures may not completely eliminate dust emissions from construction and
demolition activities. However, the measure should reduce emissions to a level that minimize impacts of
dust on the areas surrounding the construction site. When construction and/or demolition activities are
likely to cause dust emission, air monitoring must be conducted prior to beginning activities to establish a
baseline value for the quantity of SPM in the air. During construction and/or demolition operations where
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
23.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
dust is being created, air quality monitoring must be conducted to establish the level of particulate matter
in the air. Following construction and/or demolition operations where dust was created, confirmatory tests
must be conducted to quantify the level of particulate matter in the air. The conditions under which
monitoring will be conducted, as well as mitigation measures that will be implemented if high SPM
concentrations are identified must be specified in the Controls and Methods Plan.
5.2
Traffic Effects
5.2.1
Results of Dispersion Modeling
The predicted maximum concentration determined from each of the model runs is summarized in Table
5.2.1A and Table 5.2.1B. Modeling was based on the worst-case meteorological conditions defined in
Section 4.4.3.4, traffic volume forecast for 2021 and background concentrations derived from the 90th
percentile MOE air quality data for 2003 to 2007. Meteorological conditions, particularly a wind speed of
1 m/s (3.6 km/hr) that represent conditions that are considered to be more conservative than actual
meteorological data and would generate worst-case pollutant concentrations were used. Detailed
analytical results from the current modeling runs based on the premise mentioned above are presented in
Appendices A, B and C. An example of the CAL3QHC input/output files is included in Appendix D for
the Steeles Station Area.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
24.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Fig C-9
Fig B-9
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Fig C-8
Fig B-8
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Richmond Hill Centre Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, Terminal
Fig B-6
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Richmond Hill Centre Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, Terminal
Fig B-5
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Fig C-6
Fig A-9
Steeles Station, 1 intersection, 2 PPUDO,
Terminal
Fig C-5
Fig A-8
Steeles Station, 1 intersection, 2 PPUDO,
Terminal
Richmond Hill Centre Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, Terminal
Fig A-6
Steeles Station, 1 intersection, 2 PPUDO,
Terminal
Richmond Hill Centre Station, 1
intersection, 1 PPUDO, Terminal
Fig A-5
Steeles Station, 1 intersection, 2 PPUDO,
Terminal
Area
Figure ID
(Figures show
max modeled
values at 10o
increments)
C-6
C-5
C-3
C-2
B-6
B-5
B-3
B-2
A-6
A-5
A-3
A-2
Run ID
Build
Build
No Build
No Build
Build
Build
No Build
No Build
Build
Build
No Build
No Build
Option
PM2.5
CO
PM2.5
CO
PM2.5
CO
PM2.5
CO
PM2.5
CO
PM2.5
CO
Parameter
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
µg/m3
ppm
µg/m3
ppm
µg/m3
ppm
µg/m3
ppm
µg/m3
ppm
µg/m3
ppm
23.00
2.60
22.00
2.30
27.00
4.60
25.00
3.80
29.00
4.40
24.00
3.40
25.
19.20
0.54
19.20
0.54
19.20
0.54
19.20
0.54
19.20
0.54
19.20
0.54
23.00
2.60
22.00
2.30
27.00
4.60
25.00
3.80
29.00
4.40
24.00
3.40
NA
8.7
NA
7.7
NA
15.3
NA
12.7
NA
14.7
NA
11.3
Modeled
Maximum
Max Model
Concentration Background Concentration
Background
included in
1-hr avg @ Concentration 1-hr avg
% of
Model Run?
(90th
(including Criteria 110o
(Y/N)
Model Units increments
percentile) Background)
hr avg
Table 5.2.1-A
Summary and Analysis of CAL3QHC Modeling Results for CO and PM2.5
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
NA
1.82
NA
1.61
NA
3.22
NA
2.66
NA
3.08
NA
2.38
Calculated
Maximum
Concentration
8-hr avg
(converted using
persistence
factor=0.7)
NA
14.0
NA
12.4
NA
24.8
NA
20.5
NA
23.7
NA
18.3
9.20
NA
8.80
NA
10.80
NA
10.00
NA
11.60
NA
9.60
NA
30.7
NA
29.3
NA
36.0
NA
33.3
NA
38.7
NA
32.0
NA
Calculated
Maximum
Concentration
24-hr avg
(converted
using
% of
Criteria persistence % of Criteria 248-hr avg factor=0.4)
hr avg
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Fig A-7
Fig B-4
Fig B-7
Fig C-4
Fig C-7
Steeles Station, 1
intersection, 2
PPUDO, Terminal
Langstaff/Longbridge
Station, 1 intersection,
1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Langstaff/Longbridge
Station, 1 intersection,
1 PPUDO, 1 parking
Richmond Hill Centre
Station, 1 intersection,
1 PPUDO, Terminal
Richmond Hill Centre
Station, 1 intersection,
1 PPUDO, Terminal
C-4
C-1
B-4
B-1
A-4
A-1
Build
No Build
Build
No Build
Build
No Build
Option
NOx
NOx
NOx
NOx
NOx
NOx
N
N
N
N
N
N
Background
included in
Model Run?
Parameter
(Y/N)
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
Model
Units
80.00
65.00
156.00
121.00
178.00
105.00
66.23
66.23
66.23
66.23
66.23
66.23
48.00
39.00
93.60
72.60
106.80
63.00
114.23
105.23
159.83
138.83
173.03
129.23
30.4
28.0
42.5
36.9
46.0
34.3
45.69
42.09
63.93
55.53
69.21
51.69
24.3
22.4
34.0
29.5
36.8
27.5
80.00
65.00
156.00
121.00
178.00
105.00
146.23
131.23
222.23
187.23
244.23
171.23
38.9
34.9
59.1
49.8
64.9
45.5
58.49
52.49
88.89
74.89
97.69
68.49
31.1
27.9
47.3
39.8
51.9
36.4
26.
Notes: NA-Applicable Standards Not Available. No Build-Future Background Scenario without addition of subway station and accessory facilities (bus terminals and car parking facilities). Build-Future Background Scenario with addition of subway station and accessory facilities (bus terminals and car parking facilities).
NO2 background concentration given as 34 ppb, in Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Air Quality of Ontario 2006 Report, converted to µg/m3 . Ozone Limiting Method (OLM) Screening, Assumes 100% of Modeled NOx is NO2. Ambient Ratio Method - NO2 is 60% of the total NOx emissions. Based on the Ontario
Ministry of the Environment, Air Quality of Ontario 2006 Report, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 90th percentile values. Persistence factor to convert 1-hr peak average into 8- hr average 0.7. Persistence factor to convert 1-hr peak average into 24-hr average 0.4.
Fig A-4
Steeles Station, 1
intersection, 2
PPUDO, Terminal
Area
Figure ID
(Figures show
max modeled
values at 10o
increments) Run ID
OLM Screening - Assume NO2 is 100% of Modeled NOx
Concentration
NO2
NO2
Concentration
Concentration
24-hr Avg
24-hr Avg
ARM
OLM
(converted
(converted
using
using
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
Concentration Concentration
Concentration Concentration
persistence
persistence
% of
% of
% of
% of
1-hr avg ARM 1-hr avg ARM Criteria 1- factor=0.4)
Criteria 1-hr avg OLM 1-hr avg OLM Criteria 1- factor=0.4)
Criteria
Modeled NOx Background
(No
(with
hr avg
24-hr avg
(No
(with
hr avg
24-hr avg
(with
(with
Concentration Concentration Background) Background)
Background) Background)
Background)
Background)
ARM
ARM
OLM
OLM
1-hr avg @
(90th
3
3
o
3
3
3
3
µg/NO2/m
µg/NO2/m
10 increments percentile)
µg/NO2/m
µg/NO2/m 3
%
%
µg/NO2/m
µg/NO2/m
%
%
ARM - Assume NO2 is 60% of Modeled NOx Concentration
Conversion of NOx to NO2
Table 5.2.1-B
Summary and Analysis of CAL3QHC Modeling Results for NOx
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
6.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
6.1
Construction Effects
As specific details for modeling emissions from construction sites are not available at this stage of the
Undertaking, computer modeling was not attempted. Historically, modeling based on simulated scenarios
and using standard emission factors were conducted and are discussed in the report. The historical
modeling predicted that the provincial standard for TSP could be exceeded up to a distance of 475 m from
a one-hectare construction site perimeter with construction activity occurring approximately 160 hours
per month. The provincial standard for dustfall would be exceeded up to a distance of 200 m from the
construction site. The MOE expects that emission from construction operations will comply with the O.
Reg. 419/05 SPM criteria. Therefore, a work plan should be required in the contract specifications to
ensure that control measures are diligently carried out. In order to meet the provincial standards, control
efficiencies of 70% and 95%, respectively would be required.
6.2
Traffic Effects
A comparison of the predicted maximum concentrations as a percentage of the applicable criteria for
PM2.5, CO and NOx of all the model runs based on the worst-case conditions discussed in Section 5.2.1,
are presented in Tables 6.2.1, 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 for the locations near the three subway stations at Steeles,
Langstaff/Longbridge and Richmond Hill Centre. The incremental value provides a measure of the impact
resulting from the Undertaking.
These results assume that the background concentrations remain the same in 2021. Since background
concentrations represent the largest source of contaminants in the case of PM2.5, changes in background
levels may have a significant effect on PM2.5 concentrations at the local level.
Table 6.2.1
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria
Steeles Station
Average
Time
Criteria
Background
Concentration
(As percentage of
Criteria) (4)
1-hour
30
8-hour
PM2.5 (µg/m3) (1)
NO2 (ppb) (2)
Pollutants
(units)
CO (ppm)
NO2 (ppb) (3)
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Percentage of Criteria
Steeles Area
Future
No-Build
Future
Build
Incremental
Change (%)
0.54 (1.8)
11.3
14.7
3.3
13
0.54 (4.2)
18.3
23.7
5.4
24-hour
30
19.20 (64.0)
32.0
38.7
6.7
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
34.3
46.0
11.6
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
27.5
36.8
9.3
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
45.5
64.9
19.4
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
36.4
51.9
15.5
27.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table 6.2.2
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria
Langstaff/Longbridge Station
Average
Time
Criteria
Background
Concentration
(As percentage
of Criteria) (4)
1-hour
30
8-hour
PM2.5 (µg/m ) (1)
NO2 (ppb) (2)
Pollutants (units)
CO (ppm)
3
NO2 (ppb) (3)
Percentage of Criteria
Langstaff/Longbridge
Area
Future NoBuild
Future
Build
Incremental
Change (%)
0.54 (1.8)
12.7
15.3
2.7
13
0.54 (4.2)
20.5
24.8
4.3
24-hour
30
19.20 (64.0)
33.3
36.0
2.7
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
36.9
42.5
5.6
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
29.5
34.0
4.5
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
49.8
59.1
9.3
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
39.8
47.3
7.4
Table 6.2.3
Maximum Modeled Concentrations as a Percentage of Criteria
Richmond Hill Centre Station
Average
Time
Criteria
Background
Concentration
(As percentage
of Criteria) (4)
1-hour
30
8-hour
PM2.5 (µg/m ) (1)
NO2 (ppb) (2)
Pollutants (units)
CO (ppm)
3
NO2 (ppb) (3)
Percentage of Criteria
Richmond Hill Center
Area
Future NoBuild
Future
Build
Incremental
Change (%)
0.54 (1.8)
7.7
8.7
1.0
13
0.54 (4.2)
12.4
14.0
1.6
24-hour
30
19.20 (64.0)
29.3
30.7
1.3
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
28.0
30.4
2.4
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
22.4
24.3
1.9
1-hour
200
35.20 (17.6)
34.9
38.9
4.0
24-hr
100
35.20 (35.2)
27.9
31.1
3.2
Notes: (1) The criterion for PM2.5 is the federal standard published in Canada-wide standards for Particulate Matter (PM) and
Ozone adopted by the Canadian Council of Ministers (July, 2000). (2) NO2 calculated with the Ambient Ratio Method Based on the
Ministry of Environment, Air Quality of Ontario (2003) report average background concentration ratio of NO2/NOx of 0.6. (3) NO2
calculated using Tier 1 screening, Ozone Limiting Method, which assumes all NOx is NO2. (4) 90th percentile of 2006 Background
Concentration (i.e., if value is 60 ppb, then 90 percent of the data are equal to or below 60 ppb.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
28.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
As shown in Tables 6.2.1, 6.2.2 and 6.2.3, the predicted maximum concentrations and their locations for
the modeled pollutants are as follows:
•
•
•
•
The predicted maximum CO concentration will reach 25% of the criteria (at the
Langstaff/Longbridge Station area under the Future Build Scenario) with an incremental change
of 4% over the No-Build Scenario.
The predicted maximum PM2.5 concentration will reach 39% of the criteria (at the Steeles
Station area under the Future Build Scenario) with an incremental change of 7% over the NoBuild Scenario.
The predicted Maximum NO2 concentration may reach 65% of the criteria if it is assumed that all
NOx emissions are emitted in the form of NO2 (at the Steeles area under the Future Build
Scenario), with an incremental change of 19% over the No-Build Scenario. This is a conservative
assumption. A corresponding value of 46% of the criteria with an incremental change of 12%
over the No-Build Scenario resulting from the application of the ARM would be more realistic.
The change in pollutant concentrations from Future No Build to Future Build will likely not
exceed 19% even at the local level during peak hour traffic, in spite of a forecasted increase in
traffic volume of 25% compared with the No-Build Scenario.
In general, results from modeling CO, NO2 and PM2.5 at the selected locations, indicate that the
operation of the expanded Yonge Subway is not likely to have a significant impact on air quality at the
local level.
Warranty
URS warrants that its services are performed, within the limits prescribed by its clients, in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession
practicing in the same locality under similar conditions at the time the services are performed. No other
warranty or representation, either expressed or implied, is included in URS' proposals, contracts or
reports.
Limitations
URS’ reports are based, in part, upon the application of scientific and engineering principles and
professional judgment to certain facts with resultant subjective interpretations. The findings, opinions and
recommendations that are made relate exclusively to URS' specific agreement for services, certain facts
presently known to URS and our current understanding of Site conditions.
URS’ reports are intended to be used in their entirety and no excerpts may be taken to be representative of
the entire reports. Where more than one report is prepared related to the same Site, all documents and
reports should be referred to for a more advanced discussion of technical details, and should be reviewed
prior to any reliance, decisions or actions being taken on the basis of the reports.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
29.
Project: 33015719
7.0
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
REFERENCES
Best Practices for the Reduction of Air Emissions From Construction and Demolition Activities, March,
2005, Prepared by Cheminfo Services Inc., 315 Renfrew Dr., Suite 302, Markham, Ontario, L3R
9S7.
Fugitive Dust Handbook, prepared by Countess Environmental and Midwest Research Institute that was
adapted from Section 13.2.5 of EPA’s Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42).
January 1995. (http://www.wrapair.org/forums/dejf/fdh/).
Environmental Assessment for the Yonge-Spadina Subway Loop, November, 1992.
Environmental Canada. 2005. The Development of the MOBILE6.2C Model, August.
Environmental Canada. 2003. MOBILE6.2C Canadian Supplemental Users’ Guide, August.
Environmental Canada. 2005. Toronto Lester B. Pearson Climate Normals.
http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/stnselect_e.html
Litman, Todd. 2005. Rail Transit in America. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits. Victoria transport
Policy Institute, B.C. Canada.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2005. Sample MOBILE6.2C Model Input File, Local Vehicle Age
Distribution File, and Local Mileage Accumulation Rates File.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2003 - 2007. Air Quality in Ontario, 2003 - 2007 Reports.
Toronto Transit Commission Design Manual, Volume 2, DM-0412-02, Figures Fig 1.4.1.7and 1.5, (pages
12 and 13).
Toronto Transit Commission Master Specification07 07 04, Section 01575, Subsections 6.2, 10.11.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Communication with Joseph Somers of U.S. EPA,
October.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Communication with David Brizezinski of U.S. EPA,
October - December.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile
Source Emission Factor Model, EPA420-R-02-028, October.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission
Inventory Preparation. January.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1992. Guideline for modeling Carbon Monoxide from Roadway
Intersections, EPA-454/R-92-005.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
30.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
U.S. Federal Transportation Agency, November 1995 (unpublished). Air Quality Impacts of Transit
Facilities, Special Report by Arun Chatterjee and Terry L. Miller, et al. University of Tennessee,
Knoxville TN.
URS Canada Inc., January 2006, Air Quality Analysis Report for Spadina Subway Extension EA.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
31.
Project: 33015719
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX A
STEELES STATION ANALYSIS
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
627020
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
627000
627040
Figure A-1 Steeles Station Links - No Build
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4850720
4850700
4850680
4850660
4850640
4850620
4850600
4850580
4850560
627060
627080
A3
A4
BqL
627100
AqT
AqL
Cdep1
Bdep1
Ddep1
Adep1
DqL
DqT+R
627120
BqT+R
CqL
CqT+R
627140
627160
627180
627200
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.03 m
1:1,272
0
19
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
LINKS:
A1 = Free Flow Link
AqT = Queue Links
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
T3
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626950
T2
T9
N5
N4
N8
Npq1
N6
N3
N12
DqL
DqT+R
T8
O1
T7
CqT+R
O2
627000
627050
627100
T6
Tpq14 CqL
Cdep1
Tpq15
Bdep1
T4
Tpq16 Ddep1
Tpq13
Adep1
Tpq17
AqL
Tpq12
Tpq18
AqT
Tpq11
Tpq19
BqT+R
BqL
Tpq10
Tpq20
Tpq9
Tpq21
A3
Tpq8
Tpq22
A4
Tpq7
Tpq23
Tpq24
Tpq6
Tpq25
Tpq5
Tpq26
Tpq4
Tpq3
Tpq2
Tpq1
N
Figure A-2 Steeles Station Links - Build
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4850750
4850700
4850650
4850600
O8
T5
627150
O4
Opq1
O6
O5
627200
0
0.05 m
1:1,610
RECEPTORS:
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
COMPANY NAME:
68
LINKS:
A1 = Free Flow Link
AqT = Queue Link
Tpq1 = Pseudo Queue Link
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
R5
626950
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
R3
R26
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626900
R4
N
R6
627000
R25
R2
627050
R30
R7
R23
R21
R24
Figure A-3 Steeles Station Discrete Receptor Locations
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4850800
4850750
4850700
4850650
4850600
4850550
4850500
R9
R19
627100
R8
R1
R22
R20
R10
R13
R18
R11
627150
R12
R27
R17
R14
R31
627200
R29
R28
R15
627250
R16
627300
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
COMPANY NAME:
0
LINKS:
31
0.05 m
1:2,402
RECEPTORS:
R1 = Receptor ID
+ = Receptor Location
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
26.46
626950
6
.4
26
627000
82
.5
6
60
.1
2
627050
8
.6
37
48.90
8
.6
37
627100
71.34
4850850
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
0
.9
48
71.34
37.6
8
48
.9
0
71.34
627150
48
.9
0
2
60.1
.34
71
26.46
26
.46
627300
6
26.4
0
.9
48
8
37.6
60
.12
37
.68
627250
.34
71
627200
37.68
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626900
2
60.1
71.34
0
48.9
2
60.1
56
82.
8
37.6
.68
37
6
26.4
N
71.3
4
4850800
4850750
4850700
4850650
4850600
37.68
60
.1
2
48
.9
0
37.6
8
Figure A-4 Run A-1,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, NOx
93
.78
PROJECT TITLE:
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
48.90
78
93.
4850550
.56
82
4850500
56
82.
4850450
2
60.1
60.1
2
6
26.4
4.00
4.02
15.24
26.46
37.68
48.90
60.12
71.34
82.56
93.78
105.00
424
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
COMPANY NAME:
19
0.1 m
1:3,121
RECEPTORS:
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
105.00
Particulate
POLLUTANT:
MAX:
CAL3QHC
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4850900
4850800
4850700
4850600
4850500
1.16
627000
1.
16
1.48
1.80
2.
12
1.16
2.44
627100
8
3.0
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1.48
2.44
4
2.4
2
2.1 1.80
1.80
1.16
627200
1.48
1.48
0.84
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626900
1.80
1.80
2
2.1
1.80
626800
1.
16
1.4
8
1.16
N
1.8
0
2.1
2
1.4
8
1.16
Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
2.44
PROJECT TITLE:
2.1
2
627300
1.4
8
1.8
0
16
1.
48
1.
1.
16
627400
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
1.16
2.44
2.76
8
3.0
1.80
48
1.
4850400
6
2.7
1.
16
2
2.1
4
0.8
2.12
2.76
0.50
0.52
0.84
1.16
1.48
1.80
2.12
2.44
2.76
3.08
3.40
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:4,164
424
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
19
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
3.40
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
627000
20.64
21.76
32
22.
22
.3
8
2
22.8
0
21.2
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626900
20.64
20
.64
6
21.7
22.88
20.64
4
.4
23
627100
21.76
626800
20
21.
0
.2
21
22
.8
8
24
23.44
20
.0
8
20.08
20
.08
4850900
4850800
4850700
4850600
4850500
20.08
20
.6
4
20.64
20.08
0
21.2
20.08
N
32
22.
.20
21
21.76
20.64
20.08
627200
21.20
21.20
Figure A-6 Run A-3,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, PM2.5
21.76
4850400
21.76
PROJECT TITLE:
.32
22
4
.6
20
20.08
627300
627400
0
.2
21
4
.6
20
6
.7
21
20.64
20
.0
8
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
20.64
.76
21
20.64
23.44
20.08
.20
21
8
22.8
22.32
19.00
19.52
20.08
20.64
21.20
21.76
22.32
22.88
23.44
24.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
COMPANY NAME:
19
LINKS:
24.00
424
0.1 m
1:4,163
RECEPTORS:
ug/m**3
UNITS:
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
45
626900
45
14
0
102
121
627000
64
64
83
14
0
627100
45
102
4850900
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
64
121
83
102
83
140
15
9
45
64
83
627200
64
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
64
83
64
N
140
Figure A-7 Run A-4,Yonge & Steeles, Build, NOx
10
2
102
4850800
4850700
4850600
4850500
4850400
83
12
1
PROJECT TITLE:
1
12
10
2
627300
83
45
627400
26
45
64
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
45
121
45
45
64
83
7.00
26.00
45.00
64.00
83.00
102.00
121.00
140.00
159.00
178.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:4,143
424
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
68
ug/m**3
LINKS:
178.00
UNITS:
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
0.96
3.54
1.82
3.11
2.
68
627100
2.68
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
2.
25
4
3.5
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
627000
11
3.
2.25
2
1.8
626900
2.68
68
2.
1.82
3.
11
627200
2.25
1.82
2.2
5
1.82
626800
0.96
1.39
1.82
2.25
5
2.2
N
1.82
1.39
Figure A-8 Run A-5,Yonge & Steeles, Build, CO
PROJECT TITLE:
627300
68
2.
1.39
25
2.
627400
1.39
1.8
2
0.96
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
4850900
4850800
4850700
4850600
4
3.5
4850500
1
3.1
4850400
0.96
1.8
2
25
2.
1.3
9
39
1.
25
2. 8
6
2.
39
1.
0.96
1.3
9
0.50
0.53
0.96
1.39
1.82
2.25
2.68
3.11
3.54
3.97
4.40
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:4,145
424
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
68
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
4.40
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
20.12
3
.2
21
4850900
4850800
5
23.4
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
627000
22.34
45
23.
23
.4
5
4
22.3
626900
20.12
21.23
N
24
.5
6
627100
21.23
23
.45
6
24.5
24
.56
23.4
5
22
.3
4
22.34
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
22.3
4
4850700
4850600
4850500
.34
22
4850400
22
.3
4
627200
23
.45
627300
21.23
.34
22
25.
67
21
.2
3
23
.45
Figure A-9 Run A-6,Yonge & Steeles, Build, PM25
24.56
22.34
.12
20
21.23
.23
21
20.12
21.23
21
.2
3
627400
20.12
PROJECT TITLE:
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
24.56
24
.56
23.45
19.00
19.01
20.12
21.23
22.34
23.45
24.56
25.67
26.78
27.89
29.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:4,144
424
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
68
ug/m**3
LINKS:
29.00
UNITS:
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
A3
A4
Steeles and
Yonge
Steeles and
Yonge
Steeles and
Yonge
Adep1
East Bound
East Bound
East Bound
East Bound
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Steeles and
Yonge
Ddep1
South Bound
AG
AG
Steeles and
Yonge
South Bound
D1
AG
Steeles and
Yonge
Cdep1
AG
West Bound
C1
Steeles and
Yonge
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
Link
Type
West Bound
Steeles and
North Bound
Yonge
Bdep1
B1
A2
Steeles and
Yonge
Steeles and
North Bound
Yonge
A1
Steeles and
Yonge
East Bound
Direction of
Link
Model Area ID
Links
Project: 33015719
Y1 (m)
UTM
X2 (m)
UTM
Y2 (m)
UTM
627094.7 4850653.5 627160.1 4850360.5
627028.7 4850946.0 627094.6 4850653.5
627100.0 4850658.5 626813.9 4850568.5
627385.5 4850751.0 627100.1 4850659.0
627104.9 4850656.0 627041.5 4850949.0
627168.1 4850362.0 627105.0 4850655.5
627101.6 4850650.0 627386.8 4850743.0
627085.1 4850630.5 627101.6 4850621.5
627072.2 4850632.5 627085.6 4850630.5
626786.2 4850539.5 627072.2 4850632.5
626818.1 4850551.5 627101.6 4850650.0
X1 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
3
4
3
4
2
1
1
1
3
9.0
12.0
9.0
12.0
9.0
12.0
6.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
9.0
15.0
18.0
15.0
18.0
15.0
18.0
12.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
15.0
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2083
2031
1607
1607
2064
1774
1426
389
389
389
1377
2603
2539
2008
2010
2580
2218
1783
487
487
487
1722
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
EFL
EFL
No. Width of WL Link
VPHL
VPHL
PM2.5 EFL CO NOx
Lanes in Lanes
Width
Speed (#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) (g/veh- (g/veh- (g/vehHL (m) Link
(m)
(m)
No Build
Build
mile)
mile)
mile)
(km/hr)
Regular Links
Table A-1
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Steeles and
Yonge
BqT+R AG 627114.8 4850642.0 627127.8 4850579.5
Steeles and
Yonge
Steeles and
Yonge
CqT+R AG 627114.6 4850670.0 627177.1 4850689.0
Steeles and
Yonge
Steeles and
Yonge
DqT+R AG 627086.0 4850670.0 627069.1 4850746.5
North
Bound
West
Bound
West
Bound
South
Bound
South
Bound
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
DqL
CqL
BqL
AG 627094.2 4850672.0 627088.4 4850700.5
AG 627117.7 4850660.0 627141.5 4850667.5
AG 627104.8 4850639.0 627111.6 4850610.0
AG 627088.7 4850644.5 627011.1 4850618.0
Steeles and
Yonge
North
Bound
AqT
Steeles and
Yonge
AG 627087.4 4850648.5 627050.8 4850636.5
Y2 (m)
UTM
East
Bound
AqL
X2 (m)
UTM
Steeles and
Yonge
Y1 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
1
3
1
2
1
9
3
9
3
9
3
6
3
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
WL
No. Width of EFL
EFL
HL Lanes Links PM2.5 EFL CO NOx
(g/hr) (g/hr) (g/hr)
(m) in Link (m)
Queue Links
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
SFR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ST
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
AT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1798
233
1426
181
1536
238
1097
280
YFAC VPHL
(s)
No Build
Table A-1
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
East
Bound
X1 (m)
Direction Model Area Link ID Type UTM
Project: 33015719
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
CAVG
(s) No
Build
60
60
66
66
60
60
66
66
RAVG
(s) No
Build
2248
291
1783
227
1920
298
1372
350
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
60
60
66
66
60
60
66
66
VPHL CAVG RAVG
Build (s) Build (s) Build
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
AG
AG
N6
N8
N12
O2
O4
O5
O6
O8
PPUDO West
of Yonge
PPUDO West
of Yonge
PPUDO West
of Yonge
Npq1
O1
PPUDO West
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
PPUDO East
of Yonge
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
AG
N5
PPUDO West
of Yonge
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
N4
PPUDO West
of Yonge
NA
AG
N3
PPUDO West
of Yonge
NA
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
627135.1
627176.3
627181.3
627140.2
627122.5
627105.8
627040.3
627070.6
627045.4
627040.3
626999.8
627004.2
627050.9
X1 (m)
UTM
4850728.5
4850743.5
4850727.0
4850714.0
4850716.0
4850690.5
4850698.0
4850732.0
4850692.5
4850708.5
4850693.5
4850678.5
4850703.0
Y1 (m)
UTM
627122.9
627135.7
627176.4
627181.8
627139.9
627122.0
627007.4
627051.0
627050.7
626999.7
627004.3
627045.8
627040.9
X2 (m)
UTM
4850716.0
4850728.5
4850743.5
4850727.0
4850714.0
4850715.5
4850688.0
4850703.0
4850703.0
4850693.5
4850678.5
4850692.0
4850708.5
Y2 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
6
11
6
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
9
9
9
12
17
12
9
9
9
9
9
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
30
4
4
4
4
4
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
Table A-1
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
104
104
104
104
104
104
25
104
104
104
104
104
104
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
10.0000
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
20.23
100.00
20.23
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.265
100.000
0.265
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal Tpq10
Bus Terminal Tpq11
Bus Terminal Tpq12
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Bus Terminal
NA
Tpq9
Tpq8
Tpq7
Tpq6
Tpq5
Tpq4
Tpq3
Tpq2
Tpq1
T9
T8
T7
T6
T5
T4
T3
T2
T1
Bus Terminal
NA
Opq1
PPUDO East
of Yonge
NA
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
AG
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
627088.1
627076.7
627064.3
627053.3
627041.8
627030.6
627018.4
627005.9
626994.3
626982.5
626969.9
626956.2
626938.9
627093.4
627120.8
627123.4
627147.5
627126.4
626946.4
626942.4
626912.3
627143.4
X1 (m)
UTM
4850647.0
4850642.5
4850638.5
4850635.0
4850631.0
4850627.0
4850623.0
4850619.0
4850615.0
4850611.0
4850607.0
4850602.0
4850614.0
4850691.5
4850672.5
4850663.5
4850670.5
4850654.0
4850594.5
4850604.0
4850593.0
4850723.0
Y1 (m)
UTM
627100.0
627088.5
627076.2
627065.1
627053.6
627042.5
627030.3
627017.8
627006.2
626994.4
626981.8
626968.1
626942.6
627100.3
626938.6
627121.2
627124.3
627123.9
627126.5
626946.3
626942.6
627176.3
X2 (m)
UTM
4850648.5
4850644.5
4850640.5
4850637.0
4850633.0
4850629.0
4850624.5
4850620.5
4850617.0
4850613.0
4850608.5
4850604.0
4850603.0
4850666.5
4850614.0
4850673.0
4850663.0
4850664.0
4850654.0
4850594.5
4850603.5
4850733.0
Y2 (m)
UTM
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
11
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
12
9
9
12
9
9
9
12
17
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
8
30
8
8
30
8
8
8
30
4
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
Table A-1
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
132
34
132
132
47
132
132
132
51
25
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
10.0000
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
2.664
1.072
2.664
2.664
1.072
2.664
2.664
2.664
1.072
100.00
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
4.278
2.761
4.278
4.278
2.761
4.278
4.278
4.278
2.761
100.000
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
BR
BR
626963.2
626975.4
4850615.0
4850619.5
4850623.5
626951.3
626963.5
626975.2
626987.0
626999.2
4850613.5
4850618.0
4850621.5
4850625.0
4850629.0
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
I-EF Idle Emission Factor (g/hr)
For PM2.5 Modeling - Deposition Velocity =0.5 cm/sec, Settling Velecity = 0.1 cm/sec
Bus Terminal Tpq26
NA
626987.1
4850627.0
4850630.5
4850632.5
4850636.5
1
3
3
4
NA
NA
1.9920
SFR Saturation Flow Rate (veh/hr/lane) (vehicles per hour of effective green time, vphg)
Bus Terminal Tpq25
NA
BR
626998.9
627011.1
627011.2
627022.8
6
1
1
9
4
4
5
VPHL Traffic Volume on Link( Veh/hr)
Bus Terminal Tpq24
NA
BR
BR
4850634.5
4850638.0
4850640.5
6
6
3
9
9
NA
YFAC Clearance Lost Time (s) (Time lost getting queue in motion)
Bus Terminal Tpq23
NA
627023.1
627034.7
627034.7
4850644.0
4850648.0
1
3
3
4
WL Mixing zone width (m)
Bus Terminal Tpq22
NA
BR
BR
4850642.0
627046.5
627058.4
6
1
1
9
RAVG Average red total signal cycle length (s)
Bus Terminal Tpq21
NA
627046.6
4850646.0
4850649.5
4850651.5
6
6
3
EFL Emission Factor (g/veh-mile)
Bus Terminal Tpq20
NA
BR
627058.4
627070.3
627070.4
4850655.5
4850659.0
1
AT Arrival type, 1-Worst, 2-below average, 3-average, 4-above average, 5-best progression (default is 3)
Bus Terminal Tpq19
NA
BR
BR
4850653.5
627081.9
627093.6
6
Width Width of link (number of lanes * width of lane) Regular link Lane Width includes 3 m on either side of link
Bus Terminal Tpq18
NA
627082.3
4850657.0
4850660.5
4850652.5
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Speed Speed from calculation of emission factor (km/hr)
Bus Terminal Tpq17
NA
BR
627093.8
627105.4
627109.8
Y2 (m)
UTM
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
ST Signal Type, 1-pretimed, 2-actuated, 3-semi-actuated (default=1)
Bus Terminal Tpq16
NA
BR
BR
4850650.5
X2 (m)
UTM
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
CAVG Average total cycle length (s)
Bus Terminal Tpq15
NA
627097.9
Y1 (m)
UTM
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
HL Source Height (in meters)
Bus Terminal Tpq14
NA
BR
X1 (m)
UTM
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
Table A-1
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Typ Link Type, AG - at grade, FL - fill, BR - Bridge, DP - Depression
Notes:
Bus Terminal Tpq13
NA
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table A-2
Steeles Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Discrete Receptor Information
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Receptor ID
X UTM (m)
Y UTM (m)
Z (m)
R1
627077.1
4850665.5
1.8
R2
627022.3
4850647.5
1.8
R3
626961.9
4850628.0
1.8
R4
626901.8
4850606.0
1.8
R5
626913.6
4850574.0
1.8
R6
626975.3
4850594.5
1.8
R7
627034.2
4850613.5
1.8
R8
627083.1
4850625.0
1.8
R9
627103.0
4850574.5
1.8
R10
627116.4
4850512.5
1.8
R11
627151.4
4850519.0
1.8
R12
627135.0
4850581.5
1.8
R13
627118.3
4850644.0
1.8
R14
627175.9
4850665.0
1.8
R15
627238.3
4850686.5
1.8
R16
627227.9
4850711.5
1.8
R17
627164.2
4850691.5
1.8
R18
627115.5
4850678.0
1.8
R19
627099.9
4850729.0
1.8
R20
627089.7
4850775.0
1.8
R21
627058.8
4850768.5
1.8
R22
627068.7
4850722.0
1.8
R23
627035.8
4850753.0
1.8
R24
627050.3
4850791.0
1.8
R25
626987.5
4850714.5
1.8
R26
626958.1
4850664.5
1.8
R27
627142.9
4850753.5
1.8
R28
627189.2
4850743.5
1.8
R29
627180.6
4850716.5
1.8
R30
627030.6
4850559.5
1.8
R31
627204.1
4850613.0
1.8
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX B
LANGSTAFF/LONGBRIDGE STATION ANALYSIS
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626250
N
626300
Figure B-1 Langstaff/Longbridge Station Links - No Build
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4854550
4854500
4854450
4854400
CqR
CqL
626350
626400
Bdep1
Ddep1
AqT+L
Adep1
AqR
BqR
BqT
DqL
DqT
Bdep2
C1
626450
626500
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.05 m
1:1,607
0
16
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
LINKS:
A1 = Free Flow Link
AqT = Queue Link
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
626050
P3
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Ppq13
M13
626100
626150
626200
626250
626300
P4
M1
626350
626400
Eq
M12
CqR
CqL
Bdep1
Ddep1
AqT+L
AqR Adep1
BqR
BqT+R
BqT
P21
P22
P19 P20
Ppq17
Ppq21
Ppq20
Ppq19
Ppq18
P38
Bdep2
DqL
DqT
P37
P27
Ppq22
P35
P34 P39
Ppq24
Ppq25
P33
Ppq26
P32
M10
Ppq27
P31
P36
Ppq28
P30
Ppq23
M11 M6
Ppq29
P29
M9
Ppq30
P28
Ppq31
P26
Ppq32
P25
M7
M8
M5
Ppq33
P24
P23
Ppq34
Mpq1
P7
Ppq35
P2 Ppq36
M2 M3
M4
A1
Ppq14
P15
P14
Ppq9
P13
Ppq8
P12
Ppq7
P11
P16
Ppq10
Ppq6
P10
Ppq16
Ppq15 P18
P9 Ppq4Ppq5
Ppq12
P8
P17
Ppq3
Ppq11
P1Ppq2
Ppq1
P6
626000
N
Figure B-2 Langstaff/Longbridge Station Links - Build
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4854550
4854500
4854450
4854400
4854350
4854300
4854250
4854200
626450
B1
C1
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.05 m
1:2,856
0
106
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
LINKS:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
626100
R32
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626000
R29
R28
N
R31
626200
R24
R26
R27
R23
R25
626300
R30
R38
R4
R3
Figure B3 Langstaff/Longbridge Station Discrete Receptor Location
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4854600
4854500
4854400
4854300
4854200
4854100
R5
R2
626400
R34
R33
R9
R35
R36
R13
R16
R37
R12
R10
R11
R18 R17
R19
R8
R7
R6
R1
R22
R21
R20
626500
626600
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
COMPANY NAME:
0
LINKS:
158.00
MAX:
CAL3QHC
MODEL:
36
0.1 m
1:3,798
RECEPTORS:
ug/m**3
UNITS:
Particulate
POLLUTANT:
R1 = Receptor ID
+ = Receptor Location
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
626250
95
8
10
56
56
82
95
82
82
95
69
56
17
626450
56
626400
69
56
43
626350
95
30
626500
43
4854650
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
69
626300
82
30
626200
43
30
56
43
626550
17
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
N
56
43
43
Figure B-4 Run B-1, Langstaff & Yonge, No-Build, NOx
30
4854600
4854550
4854500
30
56
82
4854450
69
4854400
69
95
PROJECT TITLE:
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
43
4854350
30
4854300
17
17
69
30
4.00
17.00
30.00
43.00
56.00
69.00
82.00
95.00
108.00
121.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.05 m
1:2,820
429
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
16
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
121.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
626200
3.06
5
1.9
2.32
1.58
1.21
626350
9
2.6
626400
32
2.
2.69
626300
3.06
2.69
1.
21
3.
06
3.06
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1.58
626250
1.9
5
2.6
9
1.58
626450
1.58
1.21
626500
1.21
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
0.8
4
1.21
1
1.2
1.95
1.95
4854650
4854600
4854550
4854500
4854450
2.69
4854400
2.32
4854350
1.95
1.58
2.32
4854300
1.58
1.58
N
2.32
Figure B-5 Run B-2, Langstaff & Yonge, No-Build, CO
PROJECT TITLE:
626550
0.8
4
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
1.58
1.95
1.21
95
1. 2.32
43
3.
2.32
0.50
0.84
1.21
1.58
1.95
2.32
2.69
3.06
3.43
3.80
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.05 m
1:2,822
429
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
16
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
3.80
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4854600
4854500
2
22.3
20.31
626300
20.
98
22.32
.99
22
20.98
2
.3
22
21
.65
20
.98
626400
9
22.9
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
22.99
23.66
626200
20.31
21.65
20.98
20.31
20.31
626500
20.98
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626100
20.98
20.31
N
20.31
20
.3
1
20.98
4854700
Figure B-6 Run B-3, Langstaff & Yonge, No-Build, PM2.5
PROJECT TITLE:
626600
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
5
.6
21
4854400
22.32
22.32
.98
20
23.66
4854300
23.66
4854200
21.65
20.31
21.65
5
21.6
8
20.9
19.00
19.64
20.31
20.98
21.65
22.32
22.99
23.66
24.33
25.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:3,761
429
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
16
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
25.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4854600
4854500
4854400
626100
31
39.
89.32
5
.6
72
98
55.
39.31
1
39.3
39.31
72
.6
5
626400
5
72.6
626300
12
2.6
6
9
5.9
10
626200
89.32
72
.65
55.98
122.66
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
39.31
31
39.
72.65
55
.9
8
39.31
626500
55.98
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
39.31
4
.6
22
N
89.32
Figure B-7 Run B-4, Langstaff & Yonge, Build, NOx
55.98
4854300
39.31
4854200
8
55.9
55
.9
8
105.9
9
89.32
39.3
1
72.65
55.98
1
.3
39
89
.3
2
PROJECT TITLE:
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
22.64
72.65
1
39.3
22.64
105.99
6.00
22.64
39.31
55.98
72.65
89.32
105.99
122.66
139.33
156.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:3,760
423
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
105
ug/m**3
LINKS:
156.00
UNITS:
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4854800
4854700
4854600
4854500
2.30
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
76
2.
626400
1.
84
22
3.
2.76
1.38
1.84
626500
1.84
1.84
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
2.76
626300
1.
38
3.68
1.84
626200
4
1.8
1.84
1.8
4
1.
84
1.84
2.30
626100
2.30
1.84
1.38
2.76
626600
0.
92
626700
0.92
626000
1.38
8
1.3
92
0.
N
1.38
2.30
Figure B-8 Run B-5, Langstaff & Yonge, Build, CO
3.22
4854400
2
0.9
2.30
2.30
3.22
4854300
1.38
4854200
1.38
2.7
6
PROJECT TITLE:
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
0.92
2.30
0
2.3
1.3
8
0.50
0.92
1.38
1.84
2.30
2.76
3.22
3.68
4.14
4.60
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:5,017
423
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
105
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
4.60
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
626100
22
.55
.44
23
22.55
626300
25
.2
2
3
.3
24
24.33
626400
23.44
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
626200
7
.7
20
.44
23
21.66
3
.3
24
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
20.77
N
20.77
21.6
6
21.66
22
.55
21.66
Figure B-9 Run B-6, Langstaff & Yonge, Build, PM25
23.44
4854700
4854600
4854500
4854400
20.77
21.66
PROJECT TITLE:
21.66
626500
20
.7
7
20.77
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
6
21.6
4854300
23.4
4
24.33
21.66
22.55
4854200
25.22
20.77
5
.5
22
6
.6
21
23.44
5
.5
22
22.55
22.55
19.00
19.88
20.77
21.66
22.55
23.44
24.33
25.22
26.11
27.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:3,761
423
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
105
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
27.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Adep1
B1
Bdep1
Bdep2
C1
D1
Ddep1
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
Langstaff and
Yonge
East Bound
East Bound
North Bound
North Bound
North Bound
West Bound
South Bound
South Bound
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
A1
Model Area
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
626361
626304
626426
626372
626375
626430
626371
626087
4854461
4854756
4854486
4854518
4854465
4854170
4854457
4854415
Y1 (m)
UTM
626416
626361
626374
626373
626324
626375
626464
626370
X2 (m)
UTM
4854166
4854462
4854473
4854590
4854760
4854464
4854495
4854462
Y2 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
2
2
3
3
1
3
9.0
12.0
6.0
6.0
9.0
9.0
3.0
9.0
15
18
12
12
15
15
9
15
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes Lanes Width
Speed
(m)
(m) in Link (m)
(km/hr)
Regular Links
2650
2134
335
856
3424
2905
246
945
3312
2667
419
1070
4280
3631
307
1181
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh- (g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
VPHL
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link)
No Build
Build
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
Link X1 (m)
Link ID Type UTM
Direction of
Links
Project: 33015719
Langstaff
and Yonge CqL
Langstaff
and Yonge CqR
Langstaff
and Yonge DqL
Langstaff
and Yonge DqT
Parking
Area Exit
West
Bound
West
Bound
South
Bound
South
Bound
East
Bound
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Langstaff
and Yonge BqT
North
Bound
Eq
Langstaff
and Yonge BqR
North
Bound
Y2 (m)
UTM
626357 4854487 626348 4854540
626363 4854488 626361 4854496
626383 4854478 626419 4854486
626385 4854474 626407 4854479
626382 4854451 626400 4854353
626384 4854451 626385 4854445
626354 4854459 626314 4854452
626354 4854456 625820 4854361
X2 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AG 626383.3 4854278.0 626299.1 4854261.5 0
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
Langstaff
and Yonge AqT+L AG
East
Bound
AG
Langstaff
and Yonge AqR
Y1 (m)
UTM
2
3
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
6
9
3
3
3
9
3
6
3
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
0.041 56.148
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
1900 1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
NA
2033
101
208
127
2819
86
455
490
128
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
WL
No. Width
Lanes of
EFL
EFL
VPHL CAVG
YFAC No
HL in Links PM2.5 EFL CO NOx
(s) No
(m) Link (m) (g/hr) (g/hr) (g/hr) SFR ST AT (s) Build Build
Queue Links
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
(Continued)
Link
X1 (m)
ID Type UTM
East
Bound
Model
Direction Area
Project: 33015719
38
38
38
86
86
38
38
86
86
907
2541
126
260
159
3524
107
569
612
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
38
38
38
86
86
38
38
86
86
CAVG
RAVG
RAVG
(s) No VPHL (s)
Build Build Build (s) Build
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
P11
P10
P9
P8
P7
P6
P4
P3
P2
P1
Mpq1
M13
M12
M11
M10
M9
M8
M7
M6
M5
M4
M3
M2
M1
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
PPUDO
NA
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
626077.0
626059.4
626042.4
626025.4
626024.9
626007.9
626287.3
626046.3
626025.1
626008.1
626318.4
626356.3
626369.7
626329.6
626346.9
626352.5
626309.1
626310.1
626351.3
626356.3
626320.0
626312.3
626297.0
626297.5
4854386.5
4854381.5
4854375.5
4854370.5
4854285.5
4854364.5
4854256.0
4854182.5
4854284.5
4854365.0
4854288.0
4854345.5
4854389.0
4854308.0
4854314.5
4854305.5
4854293.0
4854293.5
4854308.5
4854292.0
4854280.0
4854283.5
4854281.0
4854261.0
626095.1
626077.0
626060.6
626043.0
626045.8
626024.9
626390.4
626287.2
626253.7
626145.7
626351.3
626282.2
626356.3
626325.4
626329.6
626346.3
626297.0
626312.3
626310.7
626351.4
626356.8
626321.1
626313.4
626297.0
4854299.0
4854296.0
4854291.5
4854288.0
4854183.0
4854285.0
4854275.5
4854256.0
4854333.0
4854407.5
4854298.0
4854288.0
4854345.5
4854299.0
4854308.0
4854314.5
4854282.0
4854284.5
4854293.5
4854308.5
4854292.0
4854279.5
4854283.0
4854280.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
No. Lanes in
Link
X2 (m) UTM Y2 (m) UTM HL (m)
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
7
7
7
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Width of
Lanes (m)
PPUDO and Parking Links
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
13
13
13
17
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
WL Link
Width
(m)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Speed
(km/hr)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
60
59
57
56
71
64
907
907
790
543
25
104
104
10
10
10
104
104
94
104
104
104
104
104
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
10.0000
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
20.23
35.90
35.90
35.90
100.00
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
EFL CO
(g/veh-mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
VPHL
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) EFL PM2.5
No Build
Build
(g/veh-mile)
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
(Continued)
Direction of
Links
Model Area Link ID Link Type X1 (m) UTM Y1 (m) UTM
Project: 33015719
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.265
0.452
0.452
0.452
100.000
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
EFL NOx
(g/veh-mile)
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
P35
P34
P33
P32
P31
P30
P29
P28
P27
P26
P25
P24
P23
P22
P21
P20
P19
P18
P17
P16
P15
P14
P13
P12
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Parking
NA
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
626236.6
626218.3
626201.5
626184.0
626165.9
626148.3
626131.3
626113.8
626254.8
626095.6
626077.6
626061.6
626042.7
626329.8
626312.3
626294.1
626275.8
626208.0
626191.8
626169.0
626146.1
626129.1
626111.6
626095.1
4854328.5
4854325.5
4854321.0
4854317.5
4854313.0
4854309.5
4854306.5
4854302.0
4854331.5
4854299.0
4854293.5
4854290.5
4854288.5
4854406.5
4854410.5
4854407.0
4854405.0
4854378.5
4854367.5
4854385.5
4854407.5
4854402.0
4854396.5
4854391.0
626253.1
626236.6
626219.1
626202.1
626185.0
626167.4
626150.4
626133.9
626270.7
626116.3
626097.2
626082.9
626064.0
626344.7
626329.3
626309.6
626286.0
626218.3
626201.6
626183.4
626165.2
626147.7
626131.0
626113.7
4854246.0
4854241.0
4854235.5
4854230.0
4854225.5
4854219.0
4854214.0
4854209.5
4854250.5
4854204.0
4854199.5
4854194.0
4854188.0
4854341.0
4854328.0
4854334.0
4854352.0
4854326.0
4854321.5
4854319.0
4854314.0
4854311.0
4854307.0
4854303.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
No. Lanes in
Link
X2 (m) UTM Y2 (m) UTM HL (m)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Width of
Lanes (m)
PPUDO and Parking Links
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
WL Link
Width
(m)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Speed
(km/hr)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
57
58
59
60
61
63
64
65
56
67
68
69
70
46
55
45
36
36
32
47
65
64
63
61
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
EFL CO
(g/veh-mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
VPHL
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) EFL PM2.5
No Build
Build
(g/veh-mile)
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
(Continued)
Direction of
Links
Model Area Link ID Link Type X1 (m) UTM Y1 (m) UTM
Project: 33015719
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
EFL NOx
(g/veh-mile)
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ppq20
Ppq19
Ppq18
Ppq17
Ppq16
Ppq15
Ppq14
Ppq13
Ppq12
Ppq11
Ppq10
Ppq9
Ppq8
Ppq7
Ppq6
Ppq5
Ppq4
Ppq3
Ppq2
Ppq1
P39
P38
P37
P36
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Parking
NA
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
626304.6
626287.0
626338.8
626269.4
626214.4
626177.2
626152.9
626223.8
626200.3
626183.3
626160.4
626139.4
626121.8
626104.5
626087.5
626069.7
626052.9
626035.7
626018.1
626001.6
626236.3
626285.4
626253.9
626276.1
4854401.0
4854397.5
4854397.5
4854405.0
4854380.0
4854379.5
4854408.5
4854347.0
4854371.0
4854365.0
4854384.5
4854398.0
4854394.5
4854388.5
4854382.0
4854378.5
4854372.5
4854366.5
4854362.5
4854365.0
4854329.5
4854352.5
4854333.0
4854310.5
626319.1
626296.9
626349.0
626279.6
626221.0
626180.3
626158.0
626226.9
626209.3
626191.7
626174.4
626156.6
626139.0
626121.4
626103.3
626086.3
626068.4
626050.8
626033.3
626040.6
626231.7
626322.6
626285.8
626287.1
4854331.0
4854350.0
4854350.0
4854356.5
4854347.5
4854364.5
4854384.0
4854332.5
4854329.5
4854325.0
4854321.0
4854317.5
4854314.5
4854311.0
4854307.0
4854302.5
4854299.5
4854295.5
4854292.0
4854178.5
4854349.0
4854322.0
4854353.0
4854258.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
No. Lanes in
Link
X2 (m) UTM Y2 (m) UTM HL (m)
11
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
6
7
7
7
7
Width of
Lanes (m)
PPUDO and Parking Links
17
17
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
11.5
13
13
13
13
WL Link
Width
(m)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Speed
(km/hr)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
54
36
22
19
13
6
9
12
33
32
50
63
64
62
60
60
58
56
55
73
8
81
64
19
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
35.90
35.90
35.90
35.90
EFL CO
(g/veh-mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
VPHL
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) EFL PM2.5
No Build
Build
(g/veh-mile)
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
(Continued)
Direction of
Links
Model Area Link ID Link Type X1 (m) UTM Y1 (m) UTM
Project: 33015719
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.452
0.452
0.452
0.452
EFL NOx
(g/veh-mile)
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
17
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
70
68
68
66
64
64
62
60
60
58
58
56
38
9
51
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
0.1000
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CAVG Average total cycle length (s)
I-EF Idle Emission Factor (g/hr)
VPHL Traffic Volume on Link( Veh/hr)
For PM2.5 Modeling - Deposition Velocity =0.5 cm/sec, Settling Velecity = 0.1 cm/sec
PM data is considered worst case due to delay times and traffic volumes. Modeling will be done using PM data and then 8 hour
peak average and 24 hour daily average will be calculated from PM Peak hour output.
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
WL Mixing zone width (m)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
11.5
SFR Saturation Flow Rate (veh/hr/lane) (vehicles per hour of effective green time, vphg)
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
6
11
YFAC Clearance Lost Time (s) (Time lost getting queue in motion)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EFL Emission Factor (g/veh-mile)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RAVG Average red total signal cycle length (s)
4854192.5
4854196.5
4854203.0
4854205.5
4854212.5
4854219.0
4854222.5
4854228.5
4854234.5
4854238.0
4854245.0
4854251.0
4854254.5
4854261.0
4854308.0
4854341.5
EFL NOx
(g/veh-mile)
Speed Speed from calculation of emission factor (km/hr)
626054.3
626071.6
626088.6
626106.2
626123.4
626140.4
626158.0
626175.6
626192.6
626210.2
626226.6
626244.4
626262.0
626278.4
626265.8
626335.5
EFL CO
(g/veh-mile)
AT Arrival type, 1-Worst, 2-below average, 3-average, 4-above average, 5-best progression (default is 3)
4854281.0
4854284.5
4854289.0
4854291.5
4854295.5
4854299.5
4854302.5
4854306.5
4854310.5
4854314.0
4854318.0
4854321.5
4854325.0
4854308.5
4854330.5
4854402.0
VPHL
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) EFL PM2.5
No Build
Build
(g/veh-mile)
Width Width of link (number of lanes * width of lane) Regular link Lane Width includes 3 m on either side of link
626035.4
626052.9
626070.8
626088.4
626105.7
626123.3
626140.8
626158.4
626176.0
626193.9
626211.8
626229.0
626246.6
626268.6
626261.3
626322.4
Speed
(km/hr)
ST Signal Type, 1-pretimed, 2-actuated, 3-semi-actuated (default=1)
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
WL Link
Width
(m)
HL Source Height (in meters)
Ppq36
Ppq35
Ppq34
Ppq33
Ppq32
Ppq31
Ppq30
Ppq29
Ppq28
Ppq27
Ppq26
Ppq25
Ppq24
Ppq23
Ppq22
Ppq21
Width of
Lanes (m)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Typ Link Type, AG - at grade, FL - fill, BR - Bridge, DP - Depression
Notes:
Parking
NA
No. Lanes in
Link
X2 (m) UTM Y2 (m) UTM HL (m)
PPUDO and Parking Links
Table B-1
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Link Information
(Continued)
Direction of
Links
Model Area Link ID Link Type X1 (m) UTM Y1 (m) UTM
Project: 33015719
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table B-2
Langstaff/Longbridge Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Parking, Discrete Receptor Information
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Receptor ID
X UTM (m)
Y UTM (m)
Z (m)
R1
626348.2
4854468.0
1.8
R2
626316.8
4854463.0
1.8
R3
626286.4
4854458.0
1.8
R4
626289.9
4854440.0
1.8
R5
626320.3
4854445.5
1.8
R6
626349.4
4854446.5
1.8
R7
626359.8
4854420.0
1.8
R8
626367.1
4854388.0
1.8
R9
626398.8
4854394.0
1.8
R10
626392.2
4854427.0
1.8
R11
626388.1
4854455.0
1.8
R12
626408.9
4854464.5
1.8
R13
626440.7
4854477.0
1.8
R16
626431.9
4854495.0
1.8
R17
626403.3
4854487.0
1.8
R18
626380.8
4854489.0
1.8
R19
626378.8
4854523.5
1.8
R20
626364.7
4854574.5
1.8
R21
626333.6
4854542.5
1.8
R22
626341.8
4854507.0
1.8
R23
626236.6
4854427.5
1.8
R24
626160.9
4854414.5
1.8
R25
626226.4
4854451.5
1.8
R26
626153.8
4854439.0
1.8
R27
626239.7
4854380.5
1.8
R28
626018.7
4854382.5
1.8
R29
626007.4
4854265.0
1.8
R30
626293.9
4854238.5
1.8
R31
626194.7
4854211.0
1.8
R32
626067.8
4854175.0
1.8
R33
626379.8
4854260.5
1.8
R34
626392.5
4854197.0
1.8
R35
626446.1
4854180.0
1.8
R36
626429.3
4854264.0
1.8
R37
626413.8
4854307.5
1.8
R38
626286.0
4854322.5
1.8
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX C
RICHMOND HILL CENTRE STATION ANALYSIS
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Cdep1
Bdep1
CqT+L
C3
626190
626200
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626180
A1
626210
626220
626230
AqL
AqT+R
BqT
626250
BqL
Adep1
626240
Ddep1
DqT+RDqL
626280
Adep2
626260
626270
B3
626290
626300
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.02 m
1:737
0
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
20
A1 = Free Flow link
AqT = Queue Link
Figure C-1 Richmond Hill Centre Station Links - No Build
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
LINKS:
COMMENTS:
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4855080 4855090 4855100 4855110 4855120 4855130 4855140 4855150 4855160 4855170 4855180
626250
B1B2
C3
DqL
DqT+R
Cdep1 CqT+L
Bdep1
AqL Ddep1
AqT+R Adep1
BqT
BqL
B3
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626200
A1
D1
626300
Adep2
C2
C1
Figure C-2 Richmond Hill Centre Links - Build
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4855300
4855250
4855200
4855150
4855100
4855050
4855000
626350
P6
P2
626400
Ppq1
P3
P5
P1
626450
P4
626500
626550
626600
UTpq9
LTpq9
UTpq10
LTpq10
LTrp1
LT5
UT5
LT4UTrp1
UT4
UTpq11
LTpq11
UTpq12
LTpq12
UTpq8
LTpq8
UTpq7
LTpq7
UTpq5
LTpq5
UTpq4
LTpq4
LT2
UT2
UTpq13
LTpq13
UTpq14
LTpq14
LTpq3
LT7
UT7
K1 UTpq3
UTpq2
LTpq2
UTpq1
LTpq1
LT6
UT6
UT3
LT3
UTpq6
LTpq6
LT1
UT1
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.05 m
1:2,625
0
72
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
LINKS:
A1 = Free Flow Link
AqT = Queue Link
Tpq1 = Pseudo Queue link
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
R26
R24
626100
R46
R25
R23
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626000
R47
R7
R16
R15
R9
R12
R48
626300
R18
R14
R13
R8
R19
R20
R21
R1
626200
R22
R27
R2
R6
R5
R32
R3
R4
R33
R30
R28
R36
R35
626400
R11
R10
R34
R45
R43
626500
R31
R29
R38
R37
R39
626600
R40
R42
R41
626700
626800
626900
627000
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.1 m
1:6,036
46
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
0
R1 = Receptor ID
+ = Receptor Location
Figure C-3 Richmond Hill Centre Station Discrete Receptor Locations
LINKS:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
PROJECT TITLE:
Project: 33015719
4855700
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
4855100
4855000
4854900
16
23
37
9
51
23
626200
4855600
4855500
4855400
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
30
37
626300
30
23
626400
9
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626100
16
30
4855300
4855200
4855100
4855000
44
4854900
44
4855700
Figure C-4 Run C-1, Garden & Yonge, No-Build, NOx
PROJECT TITLE:
626500
626600
626700
626800
626900
2
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
9
16
51
2.00
9.00
16.00
23.00
30.00
37.00
44.00
51.00
58.00
65.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.2 m
1:6,288
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
20
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
65.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
4855700
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
4855100
1.10
0
0.9
0
1.1
626200
50
1.
0.7
0
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1.90
1.9
0
0.
9
1. 0
10
0.7
0
626300
1.30
1.50
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626100
90
0.
1.30
1.50
1.70
4855000
0.50
626400
0.7
0
Figure C-5 Run C-2, Garden & Yonge, No-Build, CO
PROJECT TITLE:
626500
0.
50
626600
50
0.
626700
626800
626900
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
1.70
4854900
0
0.5
0.50
0.70
0.90
1.10
1.30
1.50
1.70
1.90
2.10
2.30
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.2 m
1:6,228
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
20
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
2.30
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
20.02
21.34
22
626200
20.3
5
4855700
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
626300
21
. 34
626400
19
19.69
626500
19
.6
9
19
.3
6
19
626600
19.36
19.03
19.69
19
626700
.36
19
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
19.69
19.36
19.03
8
.6
20
7
.6
21
626100
20.02
20.68
Figure C-6 Run C-3, Garden & Yonge, No-Build, PM2.5
21.01
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
19.03
PROJECT TITLE:
626800
626900
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
.01
21
4855100
2
.0
20
4855000
5
20.3
4854900
5
3
.0
20
.3
19
19.00
19.03
19.36
19.69
20.02
20.35
20.68
21.01
21.34
21.67
22.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.2 m
1:6,288
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
20
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
22.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
21.69
55.0 1
.02
30
4855700
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
8
626200
4 6.6
46
.68
30.02
626300
38.35
4
63.3
5
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626100
.02
30
4
6 3.3
4855100
5
.3
38
4855000
.69
4854900
21
38.3
13.36
30.02
13.36
626400
21.69
Figure C-7 Run C-4, Garden & Yonge, Build, NOx
626500
21.6
9
626600
30.02
13.3
6
626700
21.69
PROJECT TITLE:
13
.36
626800
626900
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
21.69
5.00
5.03
13.36
21.69
30.02
38.35
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
0.2 m
1:6,393
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
72
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
80.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
46.68 URS
55.01
63.34
71.67
80.00
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
1.22
0.99
626100
1.4
5
0.76
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1.22
2.14
626200
1.
91
1.68
1.6
1
8
1.2
2
626300
1 .9
626400
99
0.
626500
626600
0.53
0.50
626700
3
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
76
0.
0.
76
1.45
2.14
Figure C-8 Run C-5, Garden & Yonge, Build, CO
PROJECT TITLE:
626800
626900
ppm
Contours
Project: 33015719
4855700
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
4855100
1.45
4855000
0.99
4854900
0.5
0.76
0.50
0.53
0.76
0.99
1.22
1.45
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
0.2 m
1:6,314
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
72
ppm
LINKS:
UNITS:
2.60
CO
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
1.68 URS
1.91
2.14
2.37
2.60
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
6
21.24
626300
20
.3
21
.68
626200
.36
20
CALRoads View - Lakes Environmental Software
626100
20.36
20.80
2
4
1.2
2
.1
22
20.36
21.24
626400
8
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
4855700
4855600
4855500
4855400
4855300
4855200
4855100
21.24
0
20.8
4855000
4
.2
21
21.68
20.80
21.6
4854900
626500
20
.36
20.80
626600
19.92
626700
626800
19.04
2
.9
19
19
19.92
626900
19.48
19.48
Figure C-9 Run C-6, Garden & Yonge, Build, PM2.5
19.92
19.04
19
PROJECT TITLE:
ug/m**3
Contours
Project: 33015719
20.36
19.04
19.48
19.00
19.04
19.48
19.92
20.36
20.80
21.24
21.68
22.12
22.56
23.00
PROJECT / PLOT NO.:
0
SCALE:
OCF
MODELER:
URS
0.2 m
1:6,288
118
COMPANY NAME:
RECEPTORS:
72
ug/m**3
LINKS:
UNITS:
23.00
Particulate
CAL3QHC
MAX:
POLLUTANT:
MODEL:
COMMENTS:
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
South Bound
South Bound
West Bound
West Bound
West Bound
West Bound
North Bound
North Bound
North Bound
North Bound
East Bound
East Bound
East Bound
AG
Cdep1
Ddep1
AG
AG
AG
C3
D1
AG
AG
C1
C2
AG
Bdep1
AG
AG
B2
B3
AG
AG
Adep2
B1
AG
AG
Link
Type
626233
626207
626240
626268
626314
626318
626246
626263
626271
626265
626284
626242
626195
X1 (m)
UTM
4855129
4855216
4855134
4855142
4855144
4855142
4855131
4855118
4855061
4855060
4855133
4855127
4855118
Y1 (m)
UTM
626251
626233
626180
626245
626268
626240
626220
626285
626263
626246
626336
626284
626241
X2 (m)
UTM
4855064
4855129
4855123
4855158
4855142
4855134
4855219
4855132
4855118
4855131
4855138
4855132
4855126
Y2 (m)
UTM
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
2
1
3
9.0
12
6.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
9.0
3.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
3.0
9.0
15.0
18
12.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
15.0
9.0
9.0
18.0
12.0
9.0
15.0
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2083
1710
234
320
320
564
2568
274
274
2342
508
508
181
2603
2136
293
400
400
705
3209
343
343
2928
635
635
228
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
0.0164
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
10.070
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
0.326
EFL
EFL
No. Width of WL Link
VPHL
VPHL
PM2.5 EFL CO NOx
Lanes in Lanes
Width
Speed (#veh/hr/link) (#veh/hr/link) (g/veh- (g/veh- (g/vehHL (m) Link
(m)
(m)
No Build
Build
mile)
mile)
mile)
(km/hr)
Regular Links
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
Adep1
A1
Direction of
Link
Model Area ID
Links
Project: 33015719
East
Bound
East
Bound
North
Bound
North
Bound
West
Bound
South
Bound
South
Bound
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Garden and
AqL
AG
Yonge
Garden and
AqT+R AG
Yonge
Garden and
Yonge
BqL
AG
Garden and
Yonge
BqT
AG
Garden and
Yonge
CqT+L AG
Garden and
Yonge
DqL
AG
Garden and
DqT+R AG
Yonge
0
0
0
0
0
0
626243 4855120 626245 4855112
626250 4855121 626263 4855073
626258 4855135 626285 4855138
626235 4855140 626231 4855152
626228 4855139 626218 4855172
Y2 (m)
UTM
626221 4855124 626214 4855123
X2 (m)
UTM
0
Y1 (m)
UTM
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
9
3
6
9
3
6
3
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.041
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
56.148
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
WL
No. Width of EFL
EFL
HL Lanes Links PM2.5 EFL CO NOx
(g/hr) (g/hr) (g/hr)
(m) in Link (m)
Queue Links
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
SFR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ST
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
AT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1520
190
564
2211
131
145
36
YFAC VPHL
(s)
No Build
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
626220 4855127 626217 4855126
X1 (m)
Direction Model Area Link ID Type UTM
Project: 33015719
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
CAVG
(s) No
Build
41
41
58
41
41
58
58
RAVG
(s) No
Build
1899
237
705
2764
164
182
46
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
41
41
58
41
41
58
58
VPHL CAVG RAVG
Build (s) Build (s) Build
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
PPUDO
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
LTpq5
LTpq6
LTpq4
LTpq3
LTpq2
LTpq1
LT7
LT6
LT5
LT4
LT3
LT2
LT1
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Ppq1
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
626562
626553
626568
626563
626555
626545
626553
626562
626632
626632
626544
626561
626534
626453
626403
626402
626448
626452
626403
626408
X1 (m)
UTM
4855241
4855216
4855265
4855284
4855302
4855325
4855282
4855350
4855240
4855239
4855222
4855262
4855333
4855347
4855352
4855335
4855329
4855348
4855353
4855343
Y1 (m)
UTM
626553
626557
626564
626567
626559
626550
626561
626534
626563
626560
626560
626544
626553
626404
626402
626448
626452
626464
626393
626446
X2 (m)
UTM
4855232
4855205
4855251
4855269
4855288
4855307
4855264
4855334
4855349
4855192
4855193
4855222
4855283
4855352
4855335
4855329
4855347
4855356
4855364
4855339
Y2 (m)
UTM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
11
9
9
9
9
9
9
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
9
9
9
9
9
9
17
4
4
4
4
4
4
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
1
1
1
1
1
1
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
104
104
104
104
104
104
25
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
0.0112
10.0000
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
28.19
100.00
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
0.435
100.00
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Lower Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
UT7
UT6
UT5
UT4
UT3
UT2
UT1
LTrp1
LTpq14
LTpq13
LTpq12
LTpq11
LTpq10
LTpq9
LTpq8
LTpq7
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
626553
626562
626632
626632
626544
626561
626534
626641
626573
626586
626599
626610
626620
626608
626587
626572
X1 (m)
UTM
4855282
4855350
4855240
4855239
4855222
4855262
4855333
4855241
4855323
4855302
4855280
4855264
4855249
4855227
4855215
4855204
Y1 (m)
UTM
626561
626534
626563
626560
626560
626544
626553
626571
626565
626578
626591
626604
626615
626619
626604
626584
X2 (m)
UTM
4855264
4855334
4855349
4855192
4855193
4855222
4855282
4855355
4855339
4855316
4855298
4855276
4855260
4855232
4855222
4855210
Y2 (m)
UTM
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
30
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
0.0906
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
2.664
1.072
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
4.278
2.761
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Upper Bus
Terminal
Bus Terminal
Exit
K1
UTrp1
UTpq14
UTpq13
UTpq12
UTpq11
UTpq10
UTpq9
UTpq8
UTpq7
UTpq6
UTpq5
UTpq4
UTpq3
UTpq2
UTpq1
AG
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
BR
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
626554
626641
626573
626586
626599
626610
626620
626608
626587
626572
626553
626562
626568
626563
626555
626545
X1 (m)
UTM
4855282
4855241
4855323
4855302
4855280
4855264
4855249
4855227
4855215
4855204
4855216
4855241
4855265
4855284
4855302
4855325
Y1 (m)
UTM
626527
626571
626565
626578
626591
626604
626615
626619
626604
626584
626557
626553
626564
626567
626559
626550
X2 (m)
UTM
4855288
4855355
4855339
4855316
4855298
4855276
4855260
4855232
4855222
4855210
4855205
4855232
4855251
4855269
4855288
4855307
Y2 (m)
UTM
0
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
12
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
30
30
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
108
54
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
0.0906
0.0906
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
1.9920
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
1.072
1.072
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
71.761
2.761
2.761
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
104.854
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
RAVG Average red total signal cycle length (s)
YFAC Clearance Lost Time (s) (Time lost getting queue in motion)
SFR Saturation Flow Rate (veh/hr/lane) (vehicles per hour of effective green time, vphg)
For PM2.5 Modeling - Deposition Velocity =0.5 cm/sec, Settling Velecity = 0.1 cm/sec
Speed Speed from calculation of emission factor (km/hr)
EFL Emission Factor (g/veh-mile)
WL Mixing zone width (m)
VPHL Traffic Volume on Link( Veh/hr)
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
I-EF Idle Emission Factor (g/hr)
AT Arrival type, 1-Worst, 2-below average, 3-average, 4-above average, 5-best progression (default is 3)
EFL CO EFL NOx
(g/veh(g/vehmile)
mile)
ST Signal Type, 1-pretimed, 2-actuated, 3-semi-actuated (default=1)
Y2 (m)
UTM
EFL
PM2.5
(g/vehmile)
Width Width of link (number of lanes * width of lane) Regular link Lane Width includes 3 m on either side of link
X2 (m)
UTM
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
Build
CAVG Average total cycle length (s)
Y1 (m)
UTM
VPHL
(#veh/hr/link)
No Build
HL Source Height (in meters)
X1 (m)
UTM
No. Width of WL Link
HL Lanes in Lanes Width
Speed
Link
(m)
(m)
(m)
(km/hr)
PPUDO and Bus Terminal Links
Table C-1
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Link Information
(Continued)
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Typ Link Type, AG - at grade, FL - fill, BR - Bridge, DP - Depression
Notes:
Direction of
Link
Model Area Link ID Type
Links
Project: 33015719
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table C-2
Richmond Hill Centre Station, Intersection, PPUDO, Terminal, Discrete Receptor Information
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Receptor ID
X UTM (m)
Y UTM (m)
Z (m)
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R25
R24
R26
R27
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
R37
R38
R39
R40
R41
R42
R43
626213.5
626203.1
626193.8
626181.8
626222.3
626233.2
626247.3
626264.4
626303.8
626343.3
626347.4
626306.9
626275.3
626275.3
626284.1
626295.0
626246.2
626242.6
626231.6
626217.1
626175.1
626137.2
626130.4
626101.9
626096.2
626173.0
626400.8
626486.6
626400.8
626481.4
626205.4
626162.5
626380.6
626420.9
626414.8
626499.8
626486.6
626534.8
626618.0
626651.3
626615.4
626591.8
4855139.0
4855173.5
4855206.5
4855245.0
4855252.0
4855216.0
4855180.0
4855148.5
4855147.5
4855151.5
4855132.0
4855128.5
4855120.5
4855081.5
4855043.5
4855005.0
4855008.0
4855041.0
4855077.5
4855115.0
4855108.5
4855104.0
4855121.0
4855098.5
4855114.0
4855128.5
4855156.0
4855151.5
4855131.5
4855118.5
4855303.0
4855296.0
4855346.0
4855367.0
4855316.0
4855310.0
4855264.5
4855198.0
4855201.5
4855276.0
4855322.5
4855367.0
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
Project: 33015719
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Receptor ID
X UTM (m)
Y UTM (m)
Z (m)
R45
R46
R47
R48
626526.0
626072.3
626040.8
626315.8
4855361.0
4855199.0
4855284.0
4855227.0
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX D
CAL3QHC INPUT AND OUTPUT FILES
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO' 60.00 321.000 0.00 0.00 424 1.0000 0 0
'R1
' 627077.13 4850665.62
1.80
'R10
' 627116.35 4850512.50
1.80
'R11
' 627151.37 4850518.99
1.80
'R12
' 627135.02 4850581.73
1.80
'R13
' 627118.25 4850643.75
1.80
'R14
' 627175.90 4850665.11
1.80
'R15
' 627238.25 4850686.33
1.80
'R16
' 627227.94 4850711.44
1.80
'R17
' 627164.20 4850691.67
1.80
'R18
' 627115.47 4850678.12
1.80
'R19
' 627099.85 4850728.95
1.80
'R2
' 627022.25 4850647.42
1.80
'R20
' 627089.68 4850774.86
1.80
'R21
' 627058.81 4850768.38
1.80
'R22
' 627068.66 4850721.75
1.80
'R23
' 627035.76 4850752.94
1.80
'R24
' 627050.28 4850791.00
1.80
'R25
' 626987.50 4850714.49
1.80
'R26
' 626958.07 4850664.65
1.80
'R27
' 627142.88 4850753.72
1.80
'R28
' 627189.18 4850743.52
1.80
'R29
' 627180.54 4850716.45
1.80
'R3
' 626961.89 4850627.80
1.80
'R30
' 627030.65 4850559.50
1.80
'R31
' 627204.09 4850613.25
1.80
'R4
' 626901.72 4850605.83
1.80
'R5
' 626913.56 4850574.12
1.80
'R6
' 626975.25 4850594.50
1.80
'R7
' 627034.21 4850613.54
1.80
'R8
' 627083.08 4850625.11
1.80
'R9
' 627102.98 4850574.52
1.80
'Rcpt_1
' 626191.69 4849722.58
1.80
'Rcpt_10
' 627091.69 4849722.58
1.80
'Rcpt_100
' 628091.69 4850122.58
1.80
'Rcpt_101
' 626191.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_102
' 626291.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_103
' 626391.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_104
' 626491.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_105
' 626591.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_106
' 626691.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_107
' 626791.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_108
' 626891.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_109
' 626991.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_11
' 627191.69 4849722.58
1.80
'Rcpt_110
' 627091.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_111
' 627191.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_112
' 627291.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_113
' 627391.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_114
' 627491.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_115
' 627591.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_116
' 627691.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_117
' 627791.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_118
' 627891.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_119
' 627991.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_12
' 627291.69 4849722.58
1.80
'Rcpt_120
' 628091.69 4850222.58
1.80
'Rcpt_121
' 626191.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_122
' 626291.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_123
' 626391.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_124
' 626491.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_125
' 626591.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_126
' 626691.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_127
' 626791.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_128
' 626891.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_129
' 626991.69 4850322.58
1.80
'Rcpt_13
' 627391.69 4849722.58
1.80
'Rcpt_130
' 627091.69 4850322.58
1.80
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_132
'Rcpt_133
'Rcpt_134
'Rcpt_135
'Rcpt_136
'Rcpt_137
'Rcpt_138
'Rcpt_139
'Rcpt_14
'Rcpt_140
'Rcpt_141
'Rcpt_142
'Rcpt_143
'Rcpt_144
'Rcpt_145
'Rcpt_146
'Rcpt_147
'Rcpt_148
'Rcpt_149
'Rcpt_15
'Rcpt_150
'Rcpt_151
'Rcpt_152
'Rcpt_153
'Rcpt_154
'Rcpt_155
'Rcpt_156
'Rcpt_157
'Rcpt_158
'Rcpt_159
'Rcpt_16
'Rcpt_160
'Rcpt_161
'Rcpt_162
'Rcpt_163
'Rcpt_164
'Rcpt_165
'Rcpt_166
'Rcpt_167
'Rcpt_168
'Rcpt_169
'Rcpt_17
'Rcpt_170
'Rcpt_171
'Rcpt_172
'Rcpt_173
'Rcpt_174
'Rcpt_175
'Rcpt_176
'Rcpt_177
'Rcpt_178
'Rcpt_179
'Rcpt_18
'Rcpt_180
'Rcpt_181
'Rcpt_182
'Rcpt_183
'Rcpt_184
'Rcpt_185
'Rcpt_186
'Rcpt_187
'Rcpt_188
'Rcpt_19
'Rcpt_190
'Rcpt_191
'Rcpt_192
'Rcpt_193
'Rcpt_194
Project: 33015719
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627491.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627691.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627791.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627891.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
627991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4850322.58
4849722.58
4850322.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4849722.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4850422.58
4849722.58
4850422.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4849722.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4850522.58
4849722.58
4850522.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4849722.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_195
'Rcpt_196
'Rcpt_197
'Rcpt_198
'Rcpt_199
'Rcpt_2
'Rcpt_20
'Rcpt_200
'Rcpt_201
'Rcpt_202
'Rcpt_203
'Rcpt_204
'Rcpt_205
'Rcpt_206
'Rcpt_207
'Rcpt_208
'Rcpt_209
'Rcpt_21
'Rcpt_211
'Rcpt_213
'Rcpt_214
'Rcpt_215
'Rcpt_216
'Rcpt_217
'Rcpt_218
'Rcpt_219
'Rcpt_22
'Rcpt_220
'Rcpt_221
'Rcpt_222
'Rcpt_223
'Rcpt_224
'Rcpt_225
'Rcpt_226
'Rcpt_227
'Rcpt_228
'Rcpt_229
'Rcpt_23
'Rcpt_230
'Rcpt_231
'Rcpt_232
'Rcpt_233
'Rcpt_234
'Rcpt_235
'Rcpt_236
'Rcpt_237
'Rcpt_238
'Rcpt_239
'Rcpt_24
'Rcpt_240
'Rcpt_241
'Rcpt_242
'Rcpt_243
'Rcpt_244
'Rcpt_245
'Rcpt_246
'Rcpt_247
'Rcpt_248
'Rcpt_249
'Rcpt_25
'Rcpt_250
'Rcpt_251
'Rcpt_252
'Rcpt_253
'Rcpt_254
'Rcpt_255
'Rcpt_256
'Rcpt_257
Project: 33015719
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626291.69
628091.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626191.69
627191.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626291.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626391.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626491.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4850622.58
4849722.58
4849722.58
4850622.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4849822.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4850722.58
4849822.58
4850722.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4849822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4850822.58
4849822.58
4850822.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4849822.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
4850922.58
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_258
'Rcpt_259
'Rcpt_26
'Rcpt_260
'Rcpt_261
'Rcpt_262
'Rcpt_263
'Rcpt_264
'Rcpt_265
'Rcpt_266
'Rcpt_267
'Rcpt_268
'Rcpt_269
'Rcpt_27
'Rcpt_270
'Rcpt_271
'Rcpt_272
'Rcpt_273
'Rcpt_274
'Rcpt_275
'Rcpt_276
'Rcpt_277
'Rcpt_278
'Rcpt_279
'Rcpt_28
'Rcpt_280
'Rcpt_281
'Rcpt_282
'Rcpt_283
'Rcpt_284
'Rcpt_285
'Rcpt_286
'Rcpt_287
'Rcpt_288
'Rcpt_29
'Rcpt_290
'Rcpt_291
'Rcpt_292
'Rcpt_293
'Rcpt_294
'Rcpt_295
'Rcpt_296
'Rcpt_297
'Rcpt_298
'Rcpt_299
'Rcpt_3
'Rcpt_30
'Rcpt_300
'Rcpt_301
'Rcpt_302
'Rcpt_303
'Rcpt_304
'Rcpt_305
'Rcpt_306
'Rcpt_307
'Rcpt_308
'Rcpt_31
'Rcpt_310
'Rcpt_311
'Rcpt_312
'Rcpt_313
'Rcpt_314
'Rcpt_315
'Rcpt_316
'Rcpt_317
'Rcpt_318
'Rcpt_319
'Rcpt_32
Project: 33015719
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
627891.69
627991.69
626691.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626791.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626891.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626391.69
627091.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
627191.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627291.69
4850922.58
4850922.58
4849822.58
4850922.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4849822.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4851022.58
4849822.58
4851022.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4849822.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4851122.58
4849722.58
4849822.58
4851122.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4849822.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4851222.58
4849822.58
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_320
'Rcpt_321
'Rcpt_322
'Rcpt_323
'Rcpt_324
'Rcpt_325
'Rcpt_326
'Rcpt_327
'Rcpt_328
'Rcpt_329
'Rcpt_33
'Rcpt_330
'Rcpt_331
'Rcpt_332
'Rcpt_333
'Rcpt_334
'Rcpt_335
'Rcpt_336
'Rcpt_337
'Rcpt_338
'Rcpt_339
'Rcpt_34
'Rcpt_340
'Rcpt_341
'Rcpt_342
'Rcpt_343
'Rcpt_344
'Rcpt_345
'Rcpt_346
'Rcpt_347
'Rcpt_348
'Rcpt_349
'Rcpt_35
'Rcpt_350
'Rcpt_351
'Rcpt_352
'Rcpt_353
'Rcpt_354
'Rcpt_355
'Rcpt_356
'Rcpt_357
'Rcpt_358
'Rcpt_359
'Rcpt_36
'Rcpt_360
'Rcpt_361
'Rcpt_362
'Rcpt_363
'Rcpt_364
'Rcpt_365
'Rcpt_366
'Rcpt_367
'Rcpt_368
'Rcpt_369
'Rcpt_37
'Rcpt_370
'Rcpt_371
'Rcpt_372
'Rcpt_373
'Rcpt_374
'Rcpt_375
'Rcpt_376
'Rcpt_377
'Rcpt_378
'Rcpt_379
'Rcpt_38
'Rcpt_380
'Rcpt_381
Project: 33015719
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627391.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627491.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627691.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627791.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627891.69
628091.69
626191.69
4851222.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4849822.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4851322.58
4849822.58
4851322.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4849822.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4851422.58
4849822.58
4851422.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4849822.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4851522.58
4849822.58
4851522.58
4851622.58
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_382
'Rcpt_383
'Rcpt_384
'Rcpt_385
'Rcpt_386
'Rcpt_387
'Rcpt_389
'Rcpt_39
'Rcpt_390
'Rcpt_391
'Rcpt_392
'Rcpt_393
'Rcpt_394
'Rcpt_395
'Rcpt_396
'Rcpt_397
'Rcpt_398
'Rcpt_399
'Rcpt_4
'Rcpt_40
'Rcpt_400
'Rcpt_41
'Rcpt_42
'Rcpt_43
'Rcpt_44
'Rcpt_45
'Rcpt_46
'Rcpt_47
'Rcpt_48
'Rcpt_49
'Rcpt_5
'Rcpt_50
'Rcpt_51
'Rcpt_52
'Rcpt_53
'Rcpt_54
'Rcpt_55
'Rcpt_56
'Rcpt_57
'Rcpt_58
'Rcpt_59
'Rcpt_6
'Rcpt_60
'Rcpt_61
'Rcpt_62
'Rcpt_63
'Rcpt_64
'Rcpt_65
'Rcpt_66
'Rcpt_67
'Rcpt_68
'Rcpt_69
'Rcpt_7
'Rcpt_70
'Rcpt_71
'Rcpt_72
'Rcpt_73
'Rcpt_74
'Rcpt_75
'Rcpt_76
'Rcpt_77
'Rcpt_78
'Rcpt_79
'Rcpt_8
'Rcpt_80
'Rcpt_81
'Rcpt_82
'Rcpt_83
Project: 33015719
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626991.69
627991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626491.69
628091.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626691.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626791.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626891.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4849822.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4851622.58
4849722.58
4849822.58
4851622.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849722.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849922.58
4849722.58
4849922.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4849722.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4850022.58
4849722.58
4850022.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
2.00
2.00 1798 56.148 1900
2.00
' 'AG' 627115.41 4850666.30 627165.34 4850681.85
2.00 1426 56.148 1900
1
3
60
60
60
66
5 300.00
2.00 1536 56.148 1900
60
0.51 'Y'
10
0
233 56.148 1900
238 56.148 1900
181 56.148 1900
2.00
66
0.00 15.00
' 'AG' 627099.97 4850658.66 626813.85 4850568.45 1607.00 10.07
36
3
0.00 18.00
9.00
' 'AG' 627385.52 4850750.96 627100.04 4850658.75 1607.00 10.07
0.00
0.00 12.00
1
3
1
3
' 'AG' 627101.60 4850649.78 627386.75 4850742.98 1426.00 10.07
3.00
9.00
3.00
9.00
1
9.00
0.00 15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
9.00
9.00
' 'AG' 626818.08 4850551.70 627101.56 4850649.87 1377.00 10.07
' 'AG' 627094.20 4850671.97 627089.51 4850694.80
1
3
' 'AG' 627088.89 4850670.53 627075.91 4850729.04
1
3
' 'AG' 627104.75 4850638.76 627109.11 4850615.60
1
3
' 'AG' 627111.37 4850640.76 627121.76 4850590.62
1
3
0.00
0.00
' 'AG' 627085.10 4850630.52 627101.62 4850621.61 389.00 10.07
' 'AG' 627117.71 4850660.04 627136.76 4850665.83
1
3
0.00
2
0.00
6.00
' 'AG' 626786.17 4850539.44 627072.20 4850632.59 389.00 10.07
0.00
' 'AG' 627072.18 4850632.54 627085.59 4850630.49 389.00 10.07
' 'AG' 627088.71 4850644.38 627031.62 4850624.83
1
3
2.00 1097 56.148 1900
3.00
1
0.00
' 'AG' 627087.40 4850648.70 627058.19 4850638.92
1
3
66
280 56.148 1900
2.00
0.00 15.00
0.00 18.00
' 'AG' 627094.71 4850653.30 627160.15 4850360.53 2083.00 10.07
' 'AG' 627028.67 4850946.21 627094.62 4850653.55 2031.00 10.07
0.00 18.00
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
0.00 15.00
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4849722.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
4850122.58
' 'AG' 627168.12 4850361.79 627104.97 4850655.66 1774.00 10.07
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
' 'AG' 627104.87 4850655.84 627041.47 4850949.06 2064.00 10.07
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
66
1 0 'C'
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
'Rcpt_84
'Rcpt_85
'Rcpt_86
'Rcpt_87
'Rcpt_88
'Rcpt_89
'Rcpt_9
'Rcpt_90
'Rcpt_91
'Rcpt_92
'Rcpt_93
'Rcpt_94
'Rcpt_95
'Rcpt_96
'Rcpt_97
'Rcpt_98
'Rcpt_99
'RUN A-2' 19
1
'B1
1
'Bdep1
1
'Ddep1
1
'D1
2
'AqL
120
2
'AqT
120
1
'A2
1
'A3
1
'A4
2
'CqL
120
2
'BqT+R
120
2
'BqL
120
2
'DqT+R
120
2
'DqL
120
1
'A1
1
'Adep1
2
'CqT+R
120
1
'C1
1
'Cdep1
1.00
0.00
Project: 33015719
Z0 = 321. CM
ATIM = 60. MINUTES
MIXH =
300. M
AMB =
RUN: RUN A-2
0.5 PPM
PAGE
1
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
CYCLE
RED
CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION
IDLE
SIGNAL
ARRIVAL
*
LENGTH
TIME
LOST TIME
VOL
FLOW RATE
EM FAC
TYPE
RATE
*
(SEC)
(SEC)
(SEC)
(VPH)
(VPH)
(gm/hr)
--------------------------------------------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------5. AqL
*
120
66
2.0
280
1900
56.15
1
3
6. AqT
*
120
66
2.0
1097
1900
56.15
1
3
10. CqL
*
120
66
2.0
181
1900
56.15
1
3
11. BqT+R
*
120
60
2.0
1536
1900
56.15
1
3
12. BqL
*
120
60
2.0
238
1900
56.15
1
3
13. DqT+R
*
120
60
2.0
1798
1900
56.15
1
3
14. DqL
*
120
60
2.0
233
1900
56.15
1
3
ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS
-------------------------------LINK DESCRIPTION
DATE : 1/ 7/ 9
TIME : 22:30:23
*
LINK COORDINATES (M)
*
LENGTH BRG TYPE
VPH
EF
H
W
V/C QUEUE
*
X1
Y1
X2
Y2
*
(M)
(DEG)
(G/MI)
(M)
(M)
(VEH)
--------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------1. B1
* 627168.12
4850362.00
627105.00
4850655.50 *
300.
348. AG
1774. 10.1
0.0
18.0
2. Bdep1
* 627104.88
4850656.00
627041.50
4850949.00 *
300.
348. AG
2064. 10.1
0.0
15.0
3. Ddep1
* 627094.69
4850653.50
627160.12
4850360.50 *
300.
167. AG
2083. 10.1
0.0
15.0
4. D1
* 627028.69
4850946.00
627094.62
4850653.50 *
300.
167. AG
2031. 10.1
0.0
18.0
5. AqL
* 627087.38
4850648.50
627058.06
4850639.00 *
31.
252. AG
83. 100.0
0.0
3.0 0.35
5.1
6. AqT
* 627088.69
4850644.50
627031.62
4850625.00 *
60.
251. AG
166. 100.0
0.0
6.0 0.69 10.0
7. A2
* 626786.19
4850539.50
627072.19
4850632.50 *
301.
72. AG
389. 10.1
0.0
9.0
8. A3
* 627072.19
4850632.50
627085.56
4850630.50 *
14.
99. AG
389. 10.1
0.0
9.0
9. A4
* 627085.12
4850630.50
627101.62
4850621.50 *
19.
119. AG
389. 10.1
0.0
9.0
10. CqL
* 627117.69
4850660.00
627136.69
4850666.00 *
20.
73. AG
83. 100.0
0.0
3.0 0.23
3.3
11. BqT+R
* 627111.38
4850641.00
627121.69
4850591.00 *
51.
168. AG
226. 100.0
0.0
9.0 0.58
8.5
12. BqL
* 627104.75
4850639.00
627109.12
4850615.50 *
24.
169. AG
75. 100.0
0.0
3.0 0.27
4.0
13. DqT+R
* 627088.88
4850670.50
627075.94
4850729.00 *
60.
348. AG
226. 100.0
0.0
9.0 0.68 10.0
14. DqL
* 627094.19
4850672.00
627089.56
4850695.00 *
23.
349. AG
75. 100.0
0.0
3.0 0.26
3.9
15. A1
* 626818.06
4850551.50
627101.56
4850650.00 *
300.
71. AG
1377. 10.1
0.0
15.0
16. Adep1
* 627101.62
4850650.00
627386.75
4850743.00 *
300.
72. AG
1426. 10.1
0.0
12.0
17. CqT+R
* 627115.44
4850666.50
627165.31
4850682.00 *
52.
73. AG
248. 100.0
0.0
9.0 0.60
8.7
18. C1
* 627385.50
4850751.00
627100.06
4850659.00 *
300.
252. AG
1607. 10.1
0.0
18.0
19. Cdep1
* 627100.00
4850658.50
626813.88
4850568.50 *
300.
253. AG
1607. 10.1
0.0
15.0
PAGE 2
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
RUN: RUN A-2
LINK VARIABLES
-------------LINK DESCRIPTION
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
------------------------------VS =
0.0 CM/S
VD =
0.0 CM/S
U = 1.0 M/S
CLAS =
5 (E)
The MODE flag has been set to C for calculating CO averages.
DATE : 1/ 7/ 9
TIME : 22:30:23
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0 Dated 95221
***********************************************
**
** CAL3QHC Combined Output File Produced by:
** CALRoads View Ver. 3.9.0
** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.
** Date: 1/7/2009 10:30:23 PM
** File: C:\URSFiles\070 Project Deliverables - Reports\Modeling\RunA2SteelesNoBuildCO.ou2
**
***********************************************
Project: 33015719
*
120
66
2.0
1426
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
1900
RUN: RUN A-2
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
4. R12
*
627135.00
4850581.50
1.8
*
5. R13
*
627118.25
4850644.00
1.8
*
6. R14
*
627175.88
4850665.00
1.8
*
7. R15
*
627238.25
4850686.50
1.8
*
8. R16
*
627227.94
4850711.50
1.8
*
9. R17
*
627164.19
4850691.50
1.8
*
10. R18
*
627115.50
4850678.00
1.8
*
11. R19
*
627099.88
4850729.00
1.8
*
12. R2
*
627022.25
4850647.50
1.8
*
13. R20
*
627089.69
4850775.00
1.8
*
14. R21
*
627058.81
4850768.50
1.8
*
15. R22
*
627068.69
4850722.00
1.8
*
16. R23
*
627035.75
4850753.00
1.8
*
17. R24
*
627050.25
4850791.00
1.8
*
18. R25
*
626987.50
4850714.50
1.8
*
19. R26
*
626958.06
4850664.50
1.8
*
20. R27
*
627142.88
4850753.50
1.8
*
21. R28
*
627189.19
4850743.50
1.8
*
22. R29
*
627180.56
4850716.50
1.8
*
23. R3
*
626961.88
4850628.00
1.8
*
24. R30
*
627030.62
4850559.50
1.8
*
25. R31
*
627204.06
4850613.00
1.8
*
26. R4
*
626901.75
4850606.00
1.8
*
27. R5
*
626913.56
4850574.00
1.8
*
28. R6
*
626975.25
4850594.50
1.8
*
29. R7
*
627034.19
4850613.50
1.8
*
30. R8
*
627083.06
4850625.00
1.8
*
31. R9
*
627103.00
4850574.50
1.8
*
32. Rcpt_1
*
626191.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
33. Rcpt_10
*
627091.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
34. Rcpt_100
*
628091.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
35. Rcpt_101
*
626191.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
36. Rcpt_102
*
626291.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
37. Rcpt_103
*
626391.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
38. Rcpt_104
*
626491.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
39. Rcpt_105
*
626591.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
40. Rcpt_106
*
626691.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
41. Rcpt_107
*
626791.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
42. Rcpt_108
*
626891.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
43. Rcpt_109
*
626991.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
44. Rcpt_11
*
627191.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
45. Rcpt_110
*
627091.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
46. Rcpt_111
*
627191.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
47. Rcpt_112
*
627291.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
48. Rcpt_113
*
627391.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
49. Rcpt_114
*
627491.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
50. Rcpt_115
*
627591.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
51. Rcpt_116
*
627691.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
52. Rcpt_117
*
627791.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
53. Rcpt_118
*
627891.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
54. Rcpt_119
*
627991.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
55. Rcpt_12
*
627291.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
1. R1
*
627077.12
4850665.50
1.8
*
2. R10
*
627116.38
4850512.50
1.8
*
3. R11
*
627151.38
4850519.00
1.8
*
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
17. CqT+R
Project: 33015719
56.15
PAGE
1
3
3
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
RUN: RUN A-2
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_169
*
626991.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_17
*
627791.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_170
*
627091.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_171
*
627191.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
56. Rcpt_120
*
628091.69
4850222.50
1.8
*
57. Rcpt_121
*
626191.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
58. Rcpt_122
*
626291.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
59. Rcpt_123
*
626391.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
60. Rcpt_124
*
626491.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
61. Rcpt_125
*
626591.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
62. Rcpt_126
*
626691.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
63. Rcpt_127
*
626791.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
64. Rcpt_128
*
626891.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
65. Rcpt_129
*
626991.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
66. Rcpt_13
*
627391.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
67. Rcpt_130
*
627091.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
68. Rcpt_132
*
627291.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
69. Rcpt_133
*
627391.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
70. Rcpt_134
*
627491.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
71. Rcpt_135
*
627591.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
72. Rcpt_136
*
627691.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
73. Rcpt_137
*
627791.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
74. Rcpt_138
*
627891.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
75. Rcpt_139
*
627991.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
76. Rcpt_14
*
627491.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
77. Rcpt_140
*
628091.69
4850322.50
1.8
*
78. Rcpt_141
*
626191.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
79. Rcpt_142
*
626291.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
80. Rcpt_143
*
626391.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
81. Rcpt_144
*
626491.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
82. Rcpt_145
*
626591.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
83. Rcpt_146
*
626691.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
84. Rcpt_147
*
626791.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
85. Rcpt_148
*
626891.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
86. Rcpt_149
*
626991.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
87. Rcpt_15
*
627591.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
88. Rcpt_150
*
627091.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
89. Rcpt_151
*
627191.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
90. Rcpt_152
*
627291.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
91. Rcpt_153
*
627391.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
92. Rcpt_154
*
627491.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
93. Rcpt_155
*
627591.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
94. Rcpt_156
*
627691.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
95. Rcpt_157
*
627791.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
96. Rcpt_158
*
627891.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
97. Rcpt_159
*
627991.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
98. Rcpt_16
*
627691.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
99. Rcpt_160
*
628091.69
4850422.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_161
*
626191.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_162
*
626291.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_163
*
626391.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_164
*
626491.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_165
*
626591.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_166
*
626691.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_167
*
626791.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_168
*
626891.69
4850522.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
Project: 33015719
PAGE
PAGE
5
4
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Rcpt_172
Rcpt_173
Rcpt_174
Rcpt_175
Rcpt_176
Rcpt_177
Rcpt_178
Rcpt_179
Rcpt_18
Rcpt_180
Rcpt_181
Rcpt_182
Rcpt_183
Rcpt_184
Rcpt_185
Rcpt_186
Rcpt_187
Rcpt_188
Rcpt_19
Rcpt_190
Rcpt_191
Rcpt_192
Rcpt_193
Rcpt_194
Rcpt_195
Rcpt_196
Rcpt_197
Rcpt_198
Rcpt_199
Rcpt_2
Rcpt_20
Rcpt_200
Rcpt_201
Rcpt_202
Rcpt_203
Rcpt_204
Rcpt_205
Rcpt_206
Rcpt_207
Rcpt_208
Rcpt_209
Rcpt_21
Rcpt_211
Rcpt_213
Rcpt_214
Rcpt_215
Rcpt_216
Rcpt_217
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627891.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
627991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626291.69
628091.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626191.69
627191.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4850522.50
4849722.50
4850522.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4849722.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4850622.50
4849722.50
4849722.50
4850622.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4849822.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
4850722.50
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_218
*
627891.69
4850722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_219
*
627991.69
4850722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_22
*
626291.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_220
*
628091.69
4850722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_221
*
626191.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_222
*
626291.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_223
*
626391.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_224
*
626491.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_225
*
626591.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_226
*
626691.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_227
*
626791.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_228
*
626891.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_229
*
626991.69
4850822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_23
*
626391.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
Project: 33015719
PAGE
6
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Rcpt_230
Rcpt_231
Rcpt_232
Rcpt_233
Rcpt_234
Rcpt_235
Rcpt_236
Rcpt_237
Rcpt_238
Rcpt_239
Rcpt_24
Rcpt_240
Rcpt_241
Rcpt_242
Rcpt_243
Rcpt_244
Rcpt_245
Rcpt_246
Rcpt_247
Rcpt_248
Rcpt_249
Rcpt_25
Rcpt_250
Rcpt_251
Rcpt_252
Rcpt_253
Rcpt_254
Rcpt_255
Rcpt_256
Rcpt_257
Rcpt_258
Rcpt_259
Rcpt_26
Rcpt_260
Rcpt_261
Rcpt_262
Rcpt_263
Rcpt_264
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626491.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
626591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626691.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4850822.50
4849822.50
4850822.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4849822.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4850922.50
4849822.50
4850922.50
4851022.50
4851022.50
4851022.50
4851022.50
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_265
*
626591.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_266
*
626691.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_267
*
626791.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_268
*
626891.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_269
*
626991.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_27
*
626791.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_270
*
627091.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_271
*
627191.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_272
*
627291.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_273
*
627391.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_274
*
627491.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_275
*
627591.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_276
*
627691.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_277
*
627791.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_278
*
627891.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_279
*
627991.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_28
*
626891.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_280
*
628091.69
4851022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_281
*
626191.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_282
*
626291.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_283
*
626391.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_284
*
626491.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_285
*
626591.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_286
*
626691.69
4851122.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
Project: 33015719
PAGE
7
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Rcpt_287
Rcpt_288
Rcpt_29
Rcpt_290
Rcpt_291
Rcpt_292
Rcpt_293
Rcpt_294
Rcpt_295
Rcpt_296
Rcpt_297
Rcpt_298
Rcpt_299
Rcpt_3
Rcpt_30
Rcpt_300
Rcpt_301
Rcpt_302
Rcpt_303
Rcpt_304
Rcpt_305
Rcpt_306
Rcpt_307
Rcpt_308
Rcpt_31
Rcpt_310
Rcpt_311
Rcpt_312
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
626391.69
627091.69
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
627191.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
4851122.50
4851122.50
4849822.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4851122.50
4849722.50
4849822.50
4851122.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4849822.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
4851222.50
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_313
*
627391.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_314
*
627491.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_315
*
627591.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_316
*
627691.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_317
*
627791.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_318
*
627891.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_319
*
627991.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_32
*
627291.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_320
*
628091.69
4851222.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_321
*
626191.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_322
*
626291.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_323
*
626391.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_324
*
626491.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_325
*
626591.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_326
*
626691.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_327
*
626791.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_328
*
626891.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_329
*
626991.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_33
*
627391.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_330
*
627091.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_331
*
627191.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_332
*
627291.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_333
*
627391.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_334
*
627491.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_335
*
627591.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_336
*
627691.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_337
*
627791.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_338
*
627891.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_339
*
627991.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_34
*
627491.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_340
*
628091.69
4851322.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_341
*
626191.69
4851422.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_342
*
626291.69
4851422.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_343
*
626391.69
4851422.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
Project: 33015719
PAGE
8
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Rcpt_344
Rcpt_345
Rcpt_346
Rcpt_347
Rcpt_348
Rcpt_349
Rcpt_35
Rcpt_350
Rcpt_351
Rcpt_352
Rcpt_353
Rcpt_354
Rcpt_355
Rcpt_356
Rcpt_357
Rcpt_358
Rcpt_359
Rcpt_36
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
626891.69
626991.69
627591.69
627091.69
627191.69
627291.69
627391.69
627491.69
627591.69
627691.69
627791.69
627891.69
627991.69
627691.69
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4849822.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4851422.50
4849822.50
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_360
*
628091.69
4851422.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_361
*
626191.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_362
*
626291.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_363
*
626391.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_364
*
626491.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_365
*
626591.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_366
*
626691.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_367
*
626791.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_368
*
626891.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_369
*
626991.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_37
*
627791.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_370
*
627091.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_371
*
627191.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_372
*
627291.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_373
*
627391.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_374
*
627491.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_375
*
627591.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_376
*
627691.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_377
*
627791.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_378
*
627891.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_379
*
627991.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_38
*
627891.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_380
*
628091.69
4851522.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_381
*
626191.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_382
*
626291.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_383
*
626391.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_384
*
626491.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_385
*
626591.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_386
*
626691.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_387
*
626791.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_389
*
626991.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_39
*
627991.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_390
*
627091.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_391
*
627191.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_392
*
627291.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_393
*
627391.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_394
*
627491.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_395
*
627591.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_396
*
627691.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_397
*
627791.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_398
*
627891.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_399
*
627991.69
4851622.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_4
*
626491.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_40
*
628091.69
4849822.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
Project: 33015719
PAGE
9
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Rcpt_400
Rcpt_41
Rcpt_42
Rcpt_43
Rcpt_44
Rcpt_45
Rcpt_46
Rcpt_47
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
628091.69
626191.69
626291.69
626391.69
626491.69
626591.69
626691.69
626791.69
4851622.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
4849922.50
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
RUN: RUN A-2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
RUN: RUN A-2
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_48
*
626891.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_49
*
626991.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_5
*
626591.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_50
*
627091.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_51
*
627191.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_52
*
627291.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_53
*
627391.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_54
*
627491.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_55
*
627591.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_56
*
627691.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_57
*
627791.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_58
*
627891.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_59
*
627991.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_6
*
626691.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_60
*
628091.69
4849922.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_61
*
626191.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_62
*
626291.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_63
*
626391.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_64
*
626491.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_65
*
626591.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_66
*
626691.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_67
*
626791.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_68
*
626891.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_69
*
626991.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_7
*
626791.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_70
*
627091.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_71
*
627191.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_72
*
627291.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_73
*
627391.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_74
*
627491.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_75
*
627591.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_76
*
627691.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_77
*
627791.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_78
*
627891.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_79
*
627991.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_8
*
626891.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_80
*
628091.69
4850022.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_81
*
626191.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_82
*
626291.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_83
*
626391.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_84
*
626491.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_85
*
626591.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_86
*
626691.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_87
*
626791.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_88
*
626891.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_89
*
626991.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_9
*
626991.69
4849722.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_90
*
627091.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_91
*
627191.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_92
*
627291.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_93
*
627391.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_94
*
627491.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
JOB: Figure A-5 Run A-2,Yonge & Steeles, No Build, CO
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
**.
Project: 33015719
PAGE
PAGE
11
10
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
REC2
REC3
REC4
REC5
REC6
REC7
REC8
REC9
REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC19 REC20
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
2.4
2.9
0.9
1.
2.
1.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
2.2
2.3
1.
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
2.4
2.4
0.7
0.8
1.8
1.3
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
2.1
2.1
1.2
1.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
20. *
2.4
2.1
0.7
0.9
1.8
1.4
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
1.9
1.9
1.2
1.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
30. *
2.2
2.
0.7
0.8
2.
1.4
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
1.8
1.9
1.2
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.5
40. *
2.1
1.8
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.6
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.5
1.6
1.9
1.1
1.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
50. *
2.
1.7
0.5
0.8
1.9
1.7
1.8
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.5
1.5
1.9
1.1
1.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
60. *
2.1
1.5
0.5
0.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.2
0.5
1.5
2.
1.
1.4
0.9
0.8
0.5
70. *
2.4
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.2
0.5
1.8
0.5
1.5
2.1
1.1
1.4
0.9
0.9
0.5
80. *
2.8
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.6
1.6
1.9
0.6
2.1
0.5
1.5
2.2
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.2
0.5
90. *
2.7
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
1.7
1.7
2.2
0.8
2.5
0.6
1.6
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
0.7
100. *
2.4
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.6
1.6
2.2
0.9
2.3
0.7
1.7
2.5
1.3
1.6
1.4
1.4
0.8
110. *
2.3
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.4
1.4
2.
0.8
2.1
0.7
1.7
2.6
1.4
1.7
1.2
1.3
0.8
120. *
2.4
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.3
2.1
0.9
2.2
0.7
1.9
2.9
1.6
1.7
1.4
1.3
0.8
130. *
2.5
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.3
2.1
1.
2.
0.7
2.1
3.1
1.8
1.9
1.2
1.2
0.8
140. *
2.7
1.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.2
1.9
1.
1.9
0.8
2.3
3.3
1.9
2.1
1.2
1.
0.8
150. *
3.
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.2
1.9
1.
1.8
0.9
2.9
3.4
1.7
2.5
1.1
0.9
0.7
160. *
2.8
1.9
0.6
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.4
2.3
1.6
1.6
1.4
2.9
3.2
1.5
2.3
0.8
0.8
0.9
170. *
2.1
1.3
1.
1.3
2.3
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.7
2.8
2.3
1.3
2.5
2.4
2.3
1.
1.7
0.7
0.8
1.2
180. *
1.6
0.7
1.5
1.8
2.9
0.7
0.5
1.2
2.
3.
2.9
1.3
2.8
1.3
1.3
0.8
1.
0.7
0.8
1.4
190. *
1.5
0.6
1.6
1.7
3.
0.9
0.7
1.5
2.3
2.7
2.8
1.3
2.6
0.8
1.
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.4
200. *
1.7
0.5
1.6
1.6
2.7
0.9
0.7
1.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
1.4
2.3
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.6
210. *
1.8
0.5
1.4
1.6
2.5
1.
0.7
1.6
2.8
2.4
2.5
1.4
2.
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.5
220. *
1.6
0.5
1.4
1.4
2.3
1.
0.7
1.8
2.8
2.7
2.4
1.5
1.8
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.5
230. *
1.8
0.5
1.3
1.4
2.1
1.1
0.9
2.1
3.2
2.8
2.2
1.6
1.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
1.4
240. *
1.8
0.5
1.3
1.3
2.3
1.4
1.1
2.3
3.1
2.8
2.1
1.6
1.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
1.3
250. *
1.2
0.5
1.3
1.4
2.7
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.5
2.3
1.8
1.2
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
260. *
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.5
3.2
2.3
2.4
1.4
1.6
2.
1.8
0.7
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
3.
2.9
1.6
1.8
3.2
2.3
2.4
2.3
3.2
3.
2.9
2.5
2.8
2.9
3.4
1.9
2.5
1.4
1.4
1.6
DEGR. *
150
0
190
180
260
260
260
240
230
180
180
90
180
150
150
140
150
100
90
200
PAGE 12
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
*
COORDINATES (M)
*
RECEPTOR
*
X
Y
Z
*
---------------------------------------------*------------------------------------------*
**. Rcpt_95
*
627591.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_96
*
627691.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_97
*
627791.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_98
*
627891.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
**. Rcpt_99
*
627991.69
4850122.50
1.8
*
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC21 REC22 REC23 REC24 REC25 REC26 REC27 REC28 REC29 REC30 REC31 REC32 REC33 REC34 REC35 REC36 REC37 REC38 REC39 REC40
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------90. *
0.8
1.1
2.1
0.8
0.5
2.2
0.7
0.8
1.1
1.9
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.9
1.1
1.9
0.9
0.5
1.8
0.7
0.7
1.
1.8
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.9
1.
1.6
0.9
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.7
1.
1.7
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.9
1.
1.6
0.9
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.6
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.8
1.
1.6
0.9
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.7
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.8
1.
1.5
0.8
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.
1.6
2.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.8
1.
1.3
0.7
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.6
2.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.8
1.
1.2
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.5
2.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.8
1.
1.3
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
1.
1.2
1.3
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC21 REC22 REC23 REC24 REC25 REC26 REC27 REC28 REC29 REC30 REC31 REC32 REC33 REC34 REC35 REC36 REC37 REC38 REC39 REC40
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.9
3.1
3.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.4
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.5
2.1
2.8
2.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.3
0.8
0.7
1.6
1.6
2.3
2.6
2.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.3
0.9
0.7
1.7
1.8
2.4
2.6
2.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.6
0.9
0.7
1.9
1.9
2.6
2.5
2.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.4
0.7
0.7
2.1
2.1
2.8
2.6
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
60. *
0.5
0.5
1.
1.1
0.7
1.
2.4
2.3
2.7
2.7
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
70. *
0.5
0.6
1.6
1.
0.5
1.6
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.6
0.8
2.3
0.8
0.5
2.2
1.4
1.3
1.3
2.1
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.6
0.8
2.3
1.6
0.9
2.2
2.4
2.3
2.8
3.1
3.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
DEGR. *
80
80
80
40
30
80
60
60
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
40
30
PAGE 13
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
(DEGR)* REC1
REC2
REC3
REC4
REC5
REC6
REC7
REC8
REC9
REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC19 REC20
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------270. *
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.5
3.
2.5
2.5
0.9
1.1
1.8
1.7
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
280. *
0.5
0.7
1.5
1.8
2.5
2.7
2.1
0.7
1.1
1.8
1.6
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
290. *
0.5
0.7
1.6
1.9
2.5
2.6
1.8
0.7
1.
1.9
1.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
300. *
0.5
0.7
1.6
2.
2.6
2.4
1.6
0.7
1.
2.
1.7
0.5
1.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
310. *
0.5
0.7
1.6
2.3
2.8
2.2
1.6
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.8
0.5
1.8
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
320. *
0.5
0.7
1.9
2.5
2.9
2.
1.5
0.7
1.
2.
2.
0.5
1.9
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
330. *
0.5
0.9
2.2
2.8
3.3
1.9
1.3
0.5
0.9
1.9
2.1
0.5
2.1
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
340. *
1.
1.7
2.1
2.6
3.2
1.6
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.6
2.
0.5
1.9
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.6
350. *
1.7
2.5
1.6
1.8
2.4
1.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.5
1.3
1.8
1.8
0.7
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
2.4
2.9
0.9
1.
2.
1.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
2.2
2.3
1.
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
3.
2.9
2.2
2.8
3.3
2.7
2.5
2.3
3.2
3.
2.9
2.5
2.8
2.9
3.4
1.9
2.5
1.4
1.4
1.6
DEGR. *
150
0
330
330
330
280
270
240
230
180
180
90
180
150
150
140
150
100
90
200
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC41 REC42 REC43 REC44 REC45 REC46 REC47 REC48 REC49 REC50 REC51 REC52 REC53 REC54 REC55 REC56 REC57 REC58 REC59 REC60
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
190. *
1.2
1.5
1.3
0.5
0.7
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
1.4
1.6
1.4
0.5
0.9
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
1.4
1.8
1.4
0.5
0.9
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
1.6
1.7
1.5
0.5
0.9
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
1.5
1.9
1.6
0.5
0.9
1.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
1.1
1.5
1.6
0.5
0.8
1.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.5
1.
1.2
0.9
1.2
1.2
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
1.
1.1
0.7
0.5
1.2
0.7
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.8
1.
0.5
0.7
1.5
0.6
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.9
1.
0.5
0.9
1.2
0.5
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.4
0.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.1
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.5
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.6
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.8
1.4
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.6
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.2
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.4
2.
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.6
2.6
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.9
3.1
3.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
1.6
1.9
2.3
1.6
1.5
2.2
2.4
2.3
2.8
3.1
3.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
DEGR. *
220
230
80
40
270
80
60
60
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
40
30
PAGE 14
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
MODEL RESULTS
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC61 REC62 REC63 REC64 REC65 REC66 REC67 REC68 REC69 REC70 REC71 REC72 REC73 REC74 REC75 REC76 REC77 REC78 REC79 REC80
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.1
1.
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
DEGR. *
50
40
30
20
20
0
20
310
320
290
290
290
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
PAGE 16
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
DEGR. *
30
10
0
0
0
350
330
310
300
300
300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
60
PAGE 15
Project: 33015719
.-360.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC101 REC102 REC103 REC104 REC105 REC106 REC107 REC108 REC109 REC110 REC111 REC112 REC113 REC114 REC115 REC116 REC117 REC118 REC119 REC120
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC81 REC82 REC83 REC84 REC85 REC86 REC87 REC88 REC89 REC90 REC91 REC92 REC93 REC94 REC95 REC96 REC97 REC98 REC99 REC100
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.4
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.5
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.
1.
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.
0.5
1.5
1.5
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
70
60
40
30
20
20
0
10
330
300
290
290
280
280
0
0
0
0
0
0
PAGE 17
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
-------------
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC121 REC122 REC123 REC124 REC125 REC126 REC127 REC128 REC129 REC130 REC131 REC132 REC133 REC134 REC135 REC136 REC137 REC138 REC139 REC140
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.2
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.6
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
2.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
2.8
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
2.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
2.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.1
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.1
1.3
0.5
2.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.
1.6
0.5
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
1.
1.1
1.4
0.5
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.1
1.3
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.1
1.1
0.5
1.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.2
1.5
0.5
1.3
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.4
1.1
1.1
0.5
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.6
1.
1.
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.1
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.1
1.
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.3
1.
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.4
1.
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.6
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.9
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.5
1.4
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.5
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.1
1.6
1.2
1.5
0.5
1.7
1.6
1.
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
80
80
60
70
60
40
40
0
10
330
300
280
280
300
290
290
0
0
0
PAGE 18
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC141 REC142 REC143 REC144 REC145 REC146 REC147 REC148 REC149 REC150 REC151 REC152 REC153 REC154 REC155 REC156 REC157 REC158 REC159 REC160
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.
1.2
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9
1.
1.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.2
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.3
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
1.1
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.
1.3
0.5
2.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
1.
1.2
0.5
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.2
0.5
2.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.
0.5
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.
0.5
2.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.
0.5
2.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.6
1.6
1.
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
1.4
1.
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
1.6
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
1.5
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.6
1.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.4
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.9
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.2
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.
1.1
1.6
0.5
3.2
1.6
1.4
1.
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
0
90
90
100
100
80
90
0
0
270
280
280
280
290
280
280
0
0
PAGE 19
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC161 REC162 REC163 REC164 REC165 REC166 REC167 REC168 REC169 REC170 REC171 REC172 REC173 REC174 REC175 REC176 REC177 REC178 REC179 REC180
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.2
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
1.
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
1.9
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
1.8
1.
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.6
1.3
0.9
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.4
1.
1.
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.8
1.
0.9
1.
0.8
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.
0.7
0.7
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
1.5
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.5
1.
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.5
0.5
1.9
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
100
110
110
110
90
110
100
0
230
260
270
280
260
270
270
PAGE 20
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC181 REC182 REC183 REC184 REC185 REC186 REC187 REC188 REC189 REC190 REC191 REC192 REC193 REC194 REC195 REC196 REC197 REC198 REC199 REC200
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.3
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
1.2
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.4
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.6
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
260. *
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.5
0.5
1.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
DEGR. *
260
260
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
100
120
120
150
0
190
180
200
210
220
PAGE 22
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.
1.5
0.5
1.9
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.
0.8
0.7
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
0
90
120
130
110
120
140
0
180
210
230
220
240
240
250
PAGE 21
Project: 33015719
.-360.
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC221 REC222 REC223 REC224 REC225 REC226 REC227 REC228 REC229 REC230 REC231 REC232 REC233 REC234 REC235 REC236 REC237 REC238 REC239 REC240
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC201 REC202 REC203 REC204 REC205 REC206 REC207 REC208 REC209 REC210 REC211 REC212 REC213 REC214 REC215 REC216 REC217 REC218 REC219 REC220
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
1.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
1.2
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.6
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
1.1
0.8
0.7
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.1
0.8
0.8
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.7
0.8
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.7
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.8
230. *
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
240. *
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
250. *
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
260. *
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.4
0.5
1.1
0.8
0.8
DEGR. *
230
240
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
110
110
110
140
140
160
0
180
180
190
PAGE 23
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC241 REC242 REC243 REC244 REC245 REC246 REC247 REC248 REC249 REC250 REC251 REC252 REC253 REC254 REC255 REC256 REC257 REC258 REC259 REC260
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.6
190. *
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
200. *
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
210. *
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
220. *
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
230. *
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.6
1.
0.9
DEGR. *
210
220
220
230
240
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
120
120
120
150
160
10
180
190
PAGE 24
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC261 REC262 REC263 REC264 REC265 REC266 REC267 REC268 REC269 REC270 REC271 REC272 REC273 REC274 REC275 REC276 REC277 REC278 REC279 REC280
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
180. *
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.6
DEGR. *
190
200
230
220
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
130
130
140
160
0
PAGE 25
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC281 REC282 REC283 REC284 REC285 REC286 REC287 REC288 REC289 REC290 REC291 REC292 REC293 REC294 REC295 REC296 REC297 REC298 REC299 REC300
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
DEGR. *
180
190
200
220
0
0
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
0
140
140
150
160
PAGE 26
Project: 33015719
170
340
180
190
200
210
220
.-360.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PAGE
0
27
0
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
0
0
150
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
.-360.
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC301 REC302 REC303 REC304 REC305 REC306 REC307 REC308 REC309 REC310 REC311 REC312 REC313 REC314 REC315 REC316 REC317 REC318 REC319 REC320
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
160
160
170
0
180
190
200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PAGE 28
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
DEGR. *
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC341 REC342 REC343 REC344 REC345 REC346 REC347 REC348 REC349 REC350 REC351 REC352 REC353 REC354 REC355 REC356 REC357 REC358 REC359 REC360
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC321 REC322 REC323 REC324 REC325 REC326 REC327 REC328 REC329 REC330 REC331 REC332 REC333 REC334 REC335 REC336 REC337 REC338 REC339 REC340
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
160
170
170
0
180
190
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PAGE 29
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC361 REC362 REC363 REC364 REC365 REC366 REC367 REC368 REC369 REC370 REC371 REC372 REC373 REC374 REC375 REC376 REC377 REC378 REC379 REC380
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PAGE 30
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC381 REC382 REC383 REC384 REC385 REC386 REC387 REC388 REC389 REC390 REC391 REC392 REC393 REC394 REC395 REC396 REC397 REC398 REC399 REC400
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
20
10
0
0
0
340
340
330
320
0
0
0
0
PAGE 31
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
MODEL RESULTS
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC401 REC402 REC403 REC404 REC405 REC406 REC407 REC408 REC409 REC410 REC411 REC412 REC413 REC414 REC415 REC416 REC417 REC418 REC419 REC420
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.9
1.
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
40
30
10
0
0
350
340
320
310
310
PAGE 33
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
30
30
10
0
0
350
340
330
320
320
0
0
PAGE 32
Project: 33015719
.-360.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF
3.40 ppm OCCURRED AT RECEPTOR REC15.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE *
(PPM)
(DEGR)* REC421 REC422 REC423 REC424
------*---------------------------. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
30. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
40. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
50. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
60. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
80. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
90. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
100. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
110. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
120. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
130. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
140. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
150. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
160. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
170. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
180. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
190. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
200. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
210. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
220. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
230. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
240. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
250. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
260. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
270. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
280. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
290. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
300. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
310. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
320. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
330. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
340. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
350. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
360. *
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
------*---------------------------MAX
*
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
DEGR. *
0
0
0
0
WIND ANGLE RANGE:
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
-------------
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX E
MOBILE 6.2 INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
********** Header section **********
* File based on 2002_2011_ON_P1a.in from the MOE, October 2005
* Reference number for this input file - ONP1a-2 by Brett Taylor
* This file is designed for MOBILE6.2C and will provide output for Phase1 of
Ontario's Drive Clean program.
* 'Phase1' of the Drive Clean program covers Toronto; Durham; York; Peel; Halton
and Hamilton.
* Estimates to be used in CO, PM2.5, and NOX Modeling Analysis
* Sources to inputs are documented throughout.
* January and July Temperatures and Fuel RVP values are used, repectively.
* Meteorological data from: Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport
station readings.
MOBILE6 INPUT FILE
PARTICULATES :
* AIR TOXICS : CO2 and air toxics emissions are not quantified.
POLLUTANTS : CO NOX
SPREADSHEET :
*DATABASE OUTPUT :
*DATABASE VEHICLES : 21111 11111111 1 111 11111111 121
Run Data
********** Ontario Phase1 2021 **********
* Ontario Phase1 2021
* PRESS HC AS VOC :
* EXPAND EVAP :
NO REFUELING :
* Specify mileage accumulation rates
* Source: Table M1 of Vehicle Fleet Profiles for Ontario and British Columbia
* Annual Kilometer Accumulation Rates Vehicle-Kilometers Traveled and IM Program Effectiveness SBA Sept 2004.
* Source: the MOE, October 2005
MILE ACCUM RATE : Miledat_ON_.d
* Specify age distribution
* Source: the MOE, October 2005
REG DIST : age_ph1.txt
* Expand vehicle class descriptive output
EXPAND BUS EFS :
* EXPAND HDDV EFS :
* EXPAND HDGV EFS :
EXPAND LDT EFS :
* Expand exhaust emissions descriptive output
EXPAND EXHAUST :
* Expand evaporative emissions descriptive output
* EXPAND EVAPORATIVE :
* Because it is now post-1999 calendar year sulphur levels in gasoline must be specified.
* using the FUEL PROGRAM command (see Advanced Training Guide manual Day 1 * page 46)
* Sulphur source: Environment Canada's Sulphur in Liquid Fuels annual report
* Max Sulphur content from CEPA Sulphur in Gasoline Regulation Registration June * 4 1999
* The regulation implies the use of 25ppm for years after 2004.
* The 4 rows and 8 columns below represent;
* row 1 - average sulphur levels (ppm) from 2000 to 2007
* row 2 - average sulphur levels (ppm) from 2008 to 2015
* row 3 - maximum sulphur levels (ppm) from 2000 to 2007
* row 4 - maximum sulphur levels (ppm) from 2008 to 2015
FUEL PROGRAM : 4
450.0 390.0 330.0 171.0 52.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
* Below is how MOBILE would handle Drive Clean, but is included here as comments only.
* Phase-in for Phase 1 starts in 1999
* Specify Acceleration Simulation Mode FINAL I/M for years 2001 to 2030
* Specify ASM2525 PHASE-IN I/M for years 1999 to 2001
* I/M PROGRAM : 1 1999 2001 1 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 21111111 1
* I/M STRINGENCY : 1 27.0
* I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 87.0
* I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 0.3 1.2
* Stringency Compliance and Waiver Rates
* I/M PROGRAM : 2 2002 2005 1 T/O ASM 2525 FINAL
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 21111111 1
* I/M STRINGENCY : 2 27.0
* I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 87.1
* I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 0.3 1.2
* Specify Visual Gap Test
* I/M PROGRAM : 3 1999 2005 1 T/O GC
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 3 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 3 22222 21111111 1
* Specify Anti-tampering program
* ANTI-TAMP PROG : 99 80 30 22222 21111111 1 11 097. 22212222
* Specify diesel fractions
* Source: report by Stewart-Brown Associates; <Ontario vehicle profile 1985- 2004> / SBA / 2005
* If actual data is not available for this year use most recent available year. Data used in this case was estimated for calendar year: 2002
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
DIESEL FRACTIONS :
0.0100 0.0135 0.0167 0.0110 0.0058 0.0077 0.0054 0.0045 0.0048 0.0055
0.0060 0.0059 0.0042 0.0043 0.0036 0.0128 0.0198 0.0352 0.0421 0.0645
0.0798 0.0485 0.0206 0.0120 0.0049
0.0190 0.0202 0.0278 0.0391 0.0516 0.0260 0.0902 0.1302 0.0333 0.0083
0.0070 0.0060 0.0091 0.0097 0.0044 0.0193 0.0305 0.0218 0.0576 0.0412
0.0821 0.1277 0.0127 0.0219 0.0000
0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.0004 0.0045 0.0014 0.0010 0.0010 0.0007
0.0002 0.0002 0.0010 0.0004 0.0011 0.0128 0.0160 0.0294 0.0288 0.0515
0.0857 0.0301 0.0081 0.0000 0.0021
0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0097 0.0070 0.0100 0.0191 0.0211 0.0196
0.0119 0.0169 0.0145 0.0155 0.0110 0.0220 0.0323 0.0411 0.0410 0.0660
0.0422 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028
0.0744 0.1248 0.1107 0.1297 0.1564 0.1628 0.2255 0.2924 0.2677 0.3104
0.2182 0.2014 0.1533 0.1291 0.1211 0.1481 0.1961 0.1949 0.1298 0.0909
0.0593 0.0101 0.0000 0.0108 0.0099
0.3697 0.3297 0.3641 0.3990 0.4404 0.5023 0.5007 0.4829 0.3842 0.5483
0.5087 0.2300 0.2449 0.3281 0.1852 0.1966 0.2727 0.1879 0.1264 0.3768
0.4651 0.3925 0.3146 0.1250 0.0208
0.7082 0.7034 0.7301 0.7278 0.7082 0.7334 0.7388 0.6879 0.7550 0.6671
0.5722 0.5323 0.3735 0.3046 0.3073 0.3546 0.2730 0.1260 0.0521 0.0746
0.0625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1250
0.8794 0.8469 0.9185 0.9060 0.8441 0.8808 0.8939 0.8564 0.7690 0.7500
0.6941 0.6583 0.7500 0.8029 0.8255 0.8968 0.9330 0.8487 0.5909 0.2222
0.0000 0.4000 1.0000 1.0000 0.2800
0.9581 0.9354 0.9595 0.9452 0.9453 0.4964 0.6800 0.6992 0.6488 0.5854
0.7528 0.8167 0.6579 0.7429 0.5593 0.3824 0.2941 0.2000 0.1563 0.0000
0.1538 0.6000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1250
0.9533 0.9162 0.9346 0.8930 0.9391 0.9574 0.9746 0.9692 0.9725 0.9609
0.9310 0.8936 0.9180 0.8618 0.8054 0.8321 0.7143 0.8182 0.8077 0.8182
0.6190 0.4762 0.9091 0.7813 0.3454
0.9573 0.9260 0.9731 0.9511 0.9438 0.9359 0.9414 0.9453 0.9071 0.9279
0.9250 0.7788 0.8908 0.8790 0.9437 0.9351 0.8542 0.8548 0.7568 0.6000
0.6250 0.8125 0.8077 0.7692 0.2929
0.9593 0.9573 0.9607 0.9370 0.9660 0.9720 0.9815 0.9884 0.9731 0.9643
0.9753 0.9765 0.9678 0.9727 0.9814 0.9664 0.9564 0.9618 0.9746 0.8684
0.9487 0.8667 0.6000 0.7692 0.2775
0.9481 0.9490 0.9398 0.9361 0.9689 0.9698 0.9798 0.9598 0.9721 0.9444
0.9742 0.9820 0.9791 0.9932 0.9835 0.9781 0.9867 0.9692 1.0000 1.0000
1.0000 0.9286 0.8704 0.8421 0.0934
0.7775 0.7870 0.8996 0.8457 0.8410 0.8633 0.8133 0.8856 0.8863 0.8535
0.8363 0.8719 0.8316 0.7122 0.7855 0.8107 0.9149 0.9040 0.7222 0.9870
0.8947 0.9631 0.9020 0.8537 0.9400
********** Scenario 1 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB) DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 2.5 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
* All the fuel parameters below come from Appendix B of the report <Emissions of Air Toxics from on-Highway sources in Canada> March 2002
* GAS AROMATIC% : 28.4 air toxics are not calculated.
* GAS OLEFIN% : 10.3
* GAS BENZENE% : 0.8
* E200 : 53.7
* E300 : 83.3
* OXYGENATE : MTBE 0.0 0.00
* : ETOH 1.4 1.00
* : ETBE 0.0 0.00
* : TAME 0.0 0.00
* : ETOH 1.4 1.00 1 1 NA NA
* ADDITIONAL HAPS : HAP_BASE.CSV
********** Scenario 2 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 5.0 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
********** Scenario 3 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 10.0 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
********** Scenario 4 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 18.65 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
********** Scenario 5 2021, 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 2.5 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005. The RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 6 2021, 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 5.0 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 7 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 10.0 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 8 2021, 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer' fuel properties (or
special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
* All the fuel parameters below come from Appendix B of the report <Emissions of Air Toxics from on-Highway sources in Canada> March 2002
AVERAGE SPEED : 18.65 Arterial
* SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d, default data are used.
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
END OF RUN :
***************************************************************************
* MOBILE6C 6.2 (14-Oct-2004) *
* Input file: TTC21DEFAULTSTART.IN (file 1, run 1). *
***************************************************************************
M603 Comment:
User has disabled the calculation of REFUELING emissions.
* Reading non-default MILEAGE ACCUMULATION RATES from the following external
* data file: MILEDAT_ON_.D
* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external
* data file: AGE_PH1.TXT
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M616 Comment:
User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels.
M614 Comment:
User supplied diesel sale fractions.
*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 2.5
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates
* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D
* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 28.19 21.67 24.76 22.43 45.19 2.340 1.082 1.057 125.05 22.459
Composite NOX : 0.421 0.424 0.684 0.489 0.371 0.179 0.213 1.133 1.63 0.540
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 7.15 6.36 7.10 6.54 0.335 0.133 8.053
CO Running: 21.04 15.31 17.66 15.89 2.005 0.950 116.999
CO Total Exhaust: 28.19 21.67 24.76 22.43 45.19 2.340 1.082 1.057 125.05 22.459
NOx Start: 0.044 0.040 0.070 0.048 0.005 0.005 0.715
NOx Running: 0.378 0.384 0.614 0.441 0.174 0.208 0.916
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.421 0.424 0.684 0.489 0.371 0.179 0.213 1.133 1.63 0.540
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 30.47 19.36 25.28 23.43 1.044 1.098
Composite NOX : 0.584 0.382 0.640 0.795 0.167 0.231
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 6.68 6.27 7.09 7.12 0.137 0.131
CO Running: 23.79 13.09 18.19 16.31 0.907 0.967
CO Total Exhaust: 30.47 19.36 25.28 23.43 1.044 1.098
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
NOx Start: 0.064 0.034 0.065 0.083 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.520 0.349 0.575 0.712 0.163 0.226
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.584 0.382 0.640 0.795 0.167 0.231
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 68.20 3.264 1.466
Composite NOX : 0.483 4.769 1.920
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 68.20 3.264 1.466
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.483 4.769 1.920
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 5.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 18.86 15.10 17.16 15.61 36.11 1.971 0.908 0.863 75.45 15.583
Composite NOX : 0.372 0.375 0.603 0.431 0.380 0.161 0.192 1.019 1.54 0.481
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 7.15 6.36 7.10 6.54 0.335 0.133 8.053
CO Running: 11.71 8.74 10.06 9.07 1.637 0.775 67.400
CO Total Exhaust: 18.86 15.10 17.16 15.61 36.11 1.971 0.908 0.863 75.45 15.583
NOx Start: 0.044 0.040 0.070 0.048 0.005 0.005 0.715
NOx Running: 0.328 0.335 0.532 0.384 0.156 0.187 0.822
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.372 0.375 0.603 0.431 0.380 0.161 0.192 1.019 1.54 0.481
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.31 13.73 17.45 16.40 0.877 0.920
Composite NOX : 0.516 0.338 0.565 0.699 0.151 0.208
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 6.68 6.27 7.09 7.12 0.137 0.131
CO Running: 13.63 7.46 10.36 9.29 0.740 0.789
CO Total Exhaust: 20.31 13.73 17.45 16.40 0.877 0.920
NOx Start: 0.064 0.034 0.065 0.083 0.004 0.005
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
NOx Running: 0.451 0.304 0.499 0.616 0.147 0.203
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.516 0.338 0.565 0.699 0.151 0.208
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 54.50 2.664 1.197
Composite NOX : 0.495 4.278 1.724
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 54.50 2.664 1.197
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.495 4.278 1.724
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 10.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 14.42 11.90 13.47 12.29 24.02 1.463 0.667 0.595 40.43 11.905
Composite NOX : 0.306 0.307 0.497 0.354 0.400 0.135 0.160 0.846 1.46 0.400
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 7.15 6.36 7.10 6.54 0.335 0.133 8.053
CO Running: 7.27 5.54 6.38 5.75 1.129 0.535 32.380
CO Total Exhaust: 14.42 11.90 13.47 12.29 24.02 1.463 0.667 0.595 40.43 11.905
NOx Start: 0.044 0.040 0.070 0.048 0.005 0.005 0.715
NOx Running: 0.262 0.267 0.426 0.306 0.129 0.155 0.743
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.306 0.307 0.497 0.354 0.400 0.135 0.160 0.846 1.46 0.400
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 15.32 11.01 13.66 13.01 0.647 0.675
Composite NOX : 0.425 0.276 0.465 0.578 0.126 0.174
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 6.68 6.27 7.09 7.12 0.137 0.131
CO Running: 8.64 4.73 6.57 5.89 0.510 0.544
CO Total Exhaust: 15.32 11.01 13.66 13.01 0.647 0.675
NOx Start: 0.064 0.034 0.065 0.083 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.361 0.242 0.399 0.495 0.122 0.169
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.425 0.276 0.465 0.578 0.126 0.174
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 36.26 1.837 0.825
Composite NOX : 0.520 3.535 1.429
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 36.26 1.837 0.825
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.520 3.535 1.429
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 18.6
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 12.52 10.48 11.85 10.82 13.48 0.993 0.444 0.347 24.99 10.070
Composite NOX : 0.247 0.246 0.404 0.285 0.434 0.107 0.127 0.665 1.53 0.326
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 7.15 6.36 7.10 6.54 0.335 0.133 8.053
CO Running: 5.37 4.12 4.75 4.28 0.658 0.312 16.941
CO Total Exhaust: 12.52 10.48 11.85 10.82 13.48 0.993 0.444 0.347 24.99 10.070
NOx Start: 0.044 0.040 0.070 0.048 0.005 0.005 0.715
NOx Running: 0.203 0.206 0.333 0.238 0.102 0.122 0.815
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.247 0.246 0.404 0.285 0.434 0.107 0.127 0.665 1.53 0.326
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 13.06 9.80 11.98 11.51 0.435 0.448
Composite NOX : 0.345 0.220 0.377 0.472 0.100 0.137
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 6.68 6.27 7.09 7.12 0.137 0.131
CO Running: 6.38 3.53 4.89 4.39 0.298 0.318
CO Total Exhaust: 13.06 9.80 11.98 11.51 0.435 0.448
NOx Start: 0.064 0.034 0.065 0.083 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.281 0.186 0.311 0.389 0.096 0.133
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.345 0.220 0.377 0.472 0.100 0.137
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.35 1.072 0.481
Composite NOX : 0.565 2.761 1.121
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 20.35 1.072 0.481
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.565 2.761 1.121
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 2.5
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 15.99 12.70 14.52 13.15 39.79 2.321 1.090 1.032 125.43 13.805
Composite NOX : 0.435 0.391 0.603 0.444 0.303 0.169 0.212 1.082 1.23 0.509
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.51 1.74 2.18 1.85 0.334 0.134 5.446
CO Running: 14.48 10.96 12.34 11.30 1.987 0.955 119.981
CO Total Exhaust: 15.99 12.70 14.52 13.15 39.79 2.321 1.090 1.032 125.43 13.805
NOx Start: 0.035 0.034 0.057 0.039 0.005 0.005 0.548
NOx Running: 0.400 0.357 0.547 0.404 0.164 0.208 0.683
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.435 0.391 0.603 0.444 0.303 0.169 0.212 1.082 1.23 0.509
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 18.40 11.21 14.89 13.58 1.051 1.106
Composite NOX : 0.537 0.353 0.569 0.691 0.168 0.231
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.58 1.78 2.16 2.22 0.138 0.133
CO Running: 16.82 9.43 12.73 11.35 0.912 0.973
CO Total Exhaust: 18.40 11.21 14.89 13.58 1.051 1.106
NOx Start: 0.054 0.028 0.053 0.066 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.483 0.324 0.516 0.625 0.164 0.226
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.537 0.353 0.569 0.691 0.168 0.231
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 60.43 3.139 1.401
Composite NOX : 0.401 4.579 1.812
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 60.43 3.139 1.401
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.401 4.579 1.812
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 5.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 9.55 8.08 9.30 8.38 31.80 1.956 0.914 0.842 74.56 8.888
Composite NOX : 0.371 0.341 0.527 0.388 0.311 0.152 0.191 0.973 1.16 0.447
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.51 1.74 2.18 1.85 0.334 0.134 5.446
CO Running: 8.04 6.34 7.12 6.54 1.622 0.780 69.118
CO Total Exhaust: 9.55 8.08 9.30 8.38 31.80 1.956 0.914 0.842 74.56 8.888
NOx Start: 0.035 0.034 0.057 0.039 0.005 0.005 0.548
NOx Running: 0.336 0.308 0.470 0.348 0.147 0.187 0.613
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.371 0.341 0.527 0.388 0.311 0.152 0.191 0.973 1.16 0.447
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 11.32 7.24 9.50 8.78 0.883 0.927
Composite NOX : 0.468 0.308 0.496 0.603 0.152 0.208
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.58 1.78 2.16 2.22 0.138 0.133
CO Running: 9.74 5.46 7.34 6.55 0.745 0.794
CO Total Exhaust: 11.32 7.24 9.50 8.78 0.883 0.927
NOx Start: 0.054 0.028 0.053 0.066 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.414 0.280 0.443 0.537 0.147 0.203
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.468 0.308 0.496 0.603 0.152 0.208
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 48.28 2.562 1.144
Composite NOX : 0.411 4.108 1.627
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 48.28 2.562 1.144
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.411 4.108 1.627
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 10.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 6.50 5.80 6.73 6.03 21.15 1.452 0.672 0.581 38.65 6.168
Composite NOX : 0.292 0.277 0.430 0.315 0.327 0.127 0.160 0.808 1.10 0.366
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.51 1.74 2.18 1.85 0.334 0.134 5.446
CO Running: 4.98 4.06 4.55 4.18 1.119 0.538 33.205
CO Total Exhaust: 6.50 5.80 6.73 6.03 21.15 1.452 0.672 0.581 38.65 6.168
NOx Start: 0.035 0.034 0.057 0.039 0.005 0.005 0.548
NOx Running: 0.257 0.243 0.373 0.275 0.122 0.155 0.554
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.292 0.277 0.430 0.315 0.327 0.127 0.160 0.808 1.10 0.366
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 7.82 5.27 6.86 6.41 0.652 0.680
Composite NOX : 0.381 0.249 0.404 0.493 0.126 0.173
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.58 1.78 2.16 2.22 0.138 0.133
CO Running: 6.24 3.49 4.70 4.19 0.514 0.548
CO Total Exhaust: 7.82 5.27 6.86 6.41 0.652 0.680
NOx Start: 0.054 0.028 0.053 0.066 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.327 0.221 0.351 0.427 0.122 0.168
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.381 0.249 0.404 0.493 0.126 0.173
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ ------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 32.12 1.767 0.789
Composite NOX : 0.432 3.395 1.348
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 32.12 1.767 0.789
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.432 3.395 1.348
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 18.6
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 5.07 4.66 5.48 4.86 11.87 0.986 0.448 0.339 22.82 4.677
Composite NOX : 0.226 0.220 0.345 0.251 0.355 0.101 0.126 0.636 1.16 0.294
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.51 1.74 2.18 1.85 0.334 0.134 5.446
CO Running: 3.56 2.92 3.30 3.02 0.653 0.314 17.373
CO Total Exhaust: 5.07 4.66 5.48 4.86 11.87 0.986 0.448 0.339 22.82 4.677
NOx Start: 0.035 0.034 0.057 0.039 0.005 0.005 0.548
NOx Running: 0.191 0.186 0.289 0.212 0.096 0.122 0.608
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.226 0.220 0.345 0.251 0.355 0.101 0.126 0.636 1.16 0.294
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 6.04 4.30 5.56 5.26 0.438 0.452
Composite NOX : 0.306 0.197 0.324 0.399 0.100 0.137
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 1.58 1.78 2.16 2.22 0.138 0.133
CO Running: 4.46 2.52 3.40 3.04 0.300 0.319
CO Total Exhaust: 6.04 4.30 5.56 5.26 0.438 0.452
NOx Start: 0.054 0.028 0.053 0.066 0.004 0.005
NOx Running: 0.252 0.169 0.271 0.333 0.096 0.132
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.306 0.197 0.324 0.399 0.100 0.137
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 18.03 1.031 0.460
Composite NOX : 0.470 2.653 1.058
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 18.03 1.031 0.460
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.470 2.653 1.058
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------***************************************************************************
* MOBILE6C 6.2 (14-Oct-2004) *
* Input file: TTC21DEFAULTSTART.IN (file 1, run 1). *
***************************************************************************
*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, Default Start, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ ------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------********** Header section **********
* File based on 2002_2011_ON_P1a.in from the MOE, October 2005
* Reference number for this input file - ONP1a-2 by Brett Taylor
* This file is designed for MOBILE6.2C and will provide output for Phase1 of
Ontario's Drive Clean program.
* 'Phase1' of the Drive Clean program covers Toronto; Durham; York; Peel; Halton
and Hamilton.
* Estimates to be used in CO, PM2.5, and NOX Modeling Analysis
* Sources to inputs are documented throughout.
* January and July Temperatures and Fuel RVP values are used, repectively.
* Meteorological data from: Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport
station readings.
MOBILE6 INPUT FILE
PARTICULATES :
* AIR TOXICS : CO2 and air toxics emissions are not quantified.
POLLUTANTS : CO NOX
SPREADSHEET :
*DATABASE OUTPUT :
*DATABASE VEHICLES : 21111 11111111 1 111 11111111 121
Run Data
********** Ontario Phase1 2021 **********
* Ontario Phase1 2021
* PRESS HC AS VOC :
* EXPAND EVAP :
NO REFUELING :
* Specify mileage accumulation rates
* Source: Table M1 of Vehicle Fleet Profiles for Ontario and British Columbia
* Annual Kilometer Accumulation Rates Vehicle-Kilometers Traveled and IM Program
Effectiveness SBA Sept 2004.
* Source: the MOE, October 2005
MILE ACCUM RATE : Miledat_ON_.d
* Specify age distribution
* Source: the MOE, October 2005
REG DIST : age_ph1.txt
* Expand vehicle class descriptive output
EXPAND BUS EFS :
* EXPAND HDDV EFS :
* EXPAND HDGV EFS :
EXPAND LDT EFS :
* Expand exhaust emissions descriptive output
EXPAND EXHAUST :
* Expand evaporative emissions descriptive output
* EXPAND EVAPORATIVE :
* Because it is now post-1999 calendar year sulphur levels in gasoline must be
specified.
* using the FUEL PROGRAM command (see Advanced Training Guide manual Day 1
* page 46)
* Sulphur source: Environment Canada's Sulphur in Liquid Fuels annual report
* Max Sulphur content from CEPA Sulphur in Gasoline Regulation Registration June
* 4 1999
* The regulation implies the use of 25ppm for years after 2004.
* The 4 rows and 8 columns below represent;
* row 1 - average sulphur levels (ppm) from 2000 to 2007
* row 2 - average sulphur levels (ppm) from 2008 to 2015
* row 3 - maximum sulphur levels (ppm) from 2000 to 2007
* row 4 - maximum sulphur levels (ppm) from 2008 to 2015
FUEL PROGRAM : 4
450.0 390.0 330.0 171.0 52.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
* Below is how MOBILE would handle Drive Clean, but is included here as comments
only.
* Phase-in for Phase 1 starts in 1999
* Specify Acceleration Simulation Mode FINAL I/M for years 2001 to 2030
* Specify ASM2525 PHASE-IN I/M for years 1999 to 2001
* I/M PROGRAM : 1 1999 2001 1 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 21111111 1
* I/M STRINGENCY : 1 27.0
* I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 87.0
* I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 0.3 1.2
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
* Stringency Compliance and Waiver Rates
* I/M PROGRAM : 2 2002 2005 1 T/O ASM 2525 FINAL
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 21111111 1
* I/M STRINGENCY : 2 27.0
* I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 87.1
* I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 0.3 1.2
* Specify Visual Gap Test
* I/M PROGRAM : 3 1999 2005 1 T/O GC
* I/M MODEL YEARS : 3 1941 2030
* I/M VEHICLES : 3 22222 21111111 1
* Specify Anti-tampering program
* ANTI-TAMP PROG : 99 80 30 22222 21111111 1 11 097. 22212222
* Specify diesel fractions
* Source: report by Stewart-Brown Associates; <Ontario vehicle profile 19852004> / SBA / 2005
* If actual data is not available for this year use most recent available year.
Data used in this case was estimated for calendar year: 2002
DIESEL FRACTIONS :
0.0100 0.0135 0.0167 0.0110 0.0058 0.0077 0.0054 0.0045 0.0048 0.0055
0.0060 0.0059 0.0042 0.0043 0.0036 0.0128 0.0198 0.0352 0.0421 0.0645
0.0798 0.0485 0.0206 0.0120 0.0049
0.0190 0.0202 0.0278 0.0391 0.0516 0.0260 0.0902 0.1302 0.0333 0.0083
0.0070 0.0060 0.0091 0.0097 0.0044 0.0193 0.0305 0.0218 0.0576 0.0412
0.0821 0.1277 0.0127 0.0219 0.0000
0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.0004 0.0045 0.0014 0.0010 0.0010 0.0007
0.0002 0.0002 0.0010 0.0004 0.0011 0.0128 0.0160 0.0294 0.0288 0.0515
0.0857 0.0301 0.0081 0.0000 0.0021
0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0097 0.0070 0.0100 0.0191 0.0211 0.0196
0.0119 0.0169 0.0145 0.0155 0.0110 0.0220 0.0323 0.0411 0.0410 0.0660
0.0422 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028
0.0744 0.1248 0.1107 0.1297 0.1564 0.1628 0.2255 0.2924 0.2677 0.3104
0.2182 0.2014 0.1533 0.1291 0.1211 0.1481 0.1961 0.1949 0.1298 0.0909
0.0593 0.0101 0.0000 0.0108 0.0099
0.3697 0.3297 0.3641 0.3990 0.4404 0.5023 0.5007 0.4829 0.3842 0.5483
0.5087 0.2300 0.2449 0.3281 0.1852 0.1966 0.2727 0.1879 0.1264 0.3768
0.4651 0.3925 0.3146 0.1250 0.0208
0.7082 0.7034 0.7301 0.7278 0.7082 0.7334 0.7388 0.6879 0.7550 0.6671
0.5722 0.5323 0.3735 0.3046 0.3073 0.3546 0.2730 0.1260 0.0521 0.0746
0.0625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1250
0.8794 0.8469 0.9185 0.9060 0.8441 0.8808 0.8939 0.8564 0.7690 0.7500
0.6941 0.6583 0.7500 0.8029 0.8255 0.8968 0.9330 0.8487 0.5909 0.2222
0.0000 0.4000 1.0000 1.0000 0.2800
0.9581 0.9354 0.9595 0.9452 0.9453 0.4964 0.6800 0.6992 0.6488 0.5854
0.7528 0.8167 0.6579 0.7429 0.5593 0.3824 0.2941 0.2000 0.1563 0.0000
0.1538 0.6000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1250
0.9533 0.9162 0.9346 0.8930 0.9391 0.9574 0.9746 0.9692 0.9725 0.9609
0.9310 0.8936 0.9180 0.8618 0.8054 0.8321 0.7143 0.8182 0.8077 0.8182
0.6190 0.4762 0.9091 0.7813 0.3454
0.9573 0.9260 0.9731 0.9511 0.9438 0.9359 0.9414 0.9453 0.9071 0.9279
0.9250 0.7788 0.8908 0.8790 0.9437 0.9351 0.8542 0.8548 0.7568 0.6000
0.6250 0.8125 0.8077 0.7692 0.2929
0.9593 0.9573 0.9607 0.9370 0.9660 0.9720 0.9815 0.9884 0.9731 0.9643
0.9753 0.9765 0.9678 0.9727 0.9814 0.9664 0.9564 0.9618 0.9746 0.8684
0.9487 0.8667 0.6000 0.7692 0.2775
0.9481 0.9490 0.9398 0.9361 0.9689 0.9698 0.9798 0.9598 0.9721 0.9444
0.9742 0.9820 0.9791 0.9932 0.9835 0.9781 0.9867 0.9692 1.0000 1.0000
1.0000 0.9286 0.8704 0.8421 0.0934
0.7775 0.7870 0.8996 0.8457 0.8410 0.8633 0.8133 0.8856 0.8863 0.8535
0.8363 0.8719 0.8316 0.7122 0.7855 0.8107 0.9149 0.9040 0.7222 0.9870
0.8947 0.9631 0.9020 0.8537 0.9400
********** Scenario 1 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 2.5 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
FUEL RVP : 14.7
* All the fuel parameters below come from Appendix B of the report <Emissions of
Air Toxics from on-Highway sources in Canada> March 2002
* GAS AROMATIC% : 28.4 air toxics are not calculated.
* GAS OLEFIN% : 10.3
* GAS BENZENE% : 0.8
* E200 : 53.7
* E300 : 83.3
* OXYGENATE : MTBE 0.0 0.00
* : ETOH 1.4 1.00
* : ETBE 0.0 0.00
* : TAME 0.0 0.00
* : ETOH 1.4 1.00 1 1 NA NA
* ADDITIONAL HAPS : HAP_BASE.CSV
********** Scenario 2 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 5.0 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
********** Scenario 3 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 10.0 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
********** Scenario 4 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, Jan. ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 1
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 25.3 36.9
AVERAGE SPEED : 18.65 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005.
FUEL RVP : 14.7
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
********** Scenario 5 2021, 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 2.5 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP Source: MOE, October 2005. The RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 6 2021, 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 5.0 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 7 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, for July
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
AVERAGE SPEED : 10.0 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
********** Scenario 8 2021, 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold Start, PM2.5, July ***
SCENARIO RECORD : 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
CALENDAR YEAR : 2021
* Evaluation month is set to 7 for 'summer'; 1 for 'winter'. October 1 through
April 31 get 'winter' fuel properties; May 1 through September 31 get 'summer'
fuel properties (or special RVPs where applicable).
EVALUATION MONTH : 7
* Specify PM size
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5
PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV
PMDDR2.CSV
* On-road diesel sulphur content in parts per million (ppm)from Sulphur in
Liquid Fuels reports (OGEB)
DIESEL SULFUR : 350.0
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
* The SULFUR CONTENT command below becomes irrelevant for years after 1999
* the FUEL COMMAND in the RUN section above is used to specify sulphur levels
* SULFUR CONTENT :
* Min/max temperatures from MSC's Monthly Data Report for 2002, January
MIN/MAX TEMP : 64.9 86.2
* All the fuel parameters below come from Appendix B of the report <Emissions of
Air Toxics from on-Highway sources in Canada> March 2002
AVERAGE SPEED : 18.65 Arterial
SOAK DISTRIBUTION : allcoldstartsoak.d
* RVP for July is used as below
FUEL RVP : 8.9
END OF RUN :
***************************************************************************
* MOBILE6C 6.2 (14-Oct-2004) *
* Input file: TTC21COLDSTART.IN (file 1, run 1). *
***************************************************************************
M603 Comment:
User has disabled the calculation of REFUELING emissions.
* Reading non-default MILEAGE ACCUMULATION RATES from the following external
* data file: MILEDAT_ON_.D
* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external
* data file: AGE_PH1.TXT
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M 49 Warning:
1.00 MYR sum not = 1. (will normalize)
M616 Comment:
User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels.
M614 Comment:
User supplied diesel sale fractions.
*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 2.5
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates
* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D
* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 35.90 28.35 32.09 29.28 45.19 2.751 1.245 1.057 143.43 28.424
Composite NOX : 0.440 0.441 0.713 0.509 0.371 0.177 0.211 1.133 1.33 0.555
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 14.87 13.04 14.43 13.39 0.746 0.296 26.433
CO Running: 21.04 15.31 17.66 15.89 2.005 0.950 116.999
CO Total Exhaust: 35.90 28.35 32.09 29.28 45.19 2.751 1.245 1.057 143.43 28.424
NOx Start: 0.062 0.057 0.099 0.067 0.004 0.003 0.411
NOx Running: 0.378 0.384 0.614 0.441 0.174 0.208 0.916
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.440 0.441 0.713 0.509 0.371 0.177 0.211 1.133 1.33 0.555
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 37.61 25.92 32.62 30.76 1.212 1.258
Composite NOX : 0.611 0.397 0.667 0.829 0.166 0.230
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 13.81 12.84 14.43 14.45 0.306 0.291
CO Running: 23.79 13.09 18.19 16.31 0.907 0.967
CO Total Exhaust: 37.61 25.92 32.62 30.76 1.212 1.258
NOx Start: 0.091 0.048 0.092 0.117 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.520 0.349 0.575 0.712 0.163 0.226
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.611 0.397 0.667 0.829 0.166 0.230
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 68.20 3.264 1.466
Composite NOX : 0.483 4.769 1.920
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 68.20 3.264 1.466
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.483 4.769 1.920
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 5.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 26.58 21.78 24.49 22.45 36.11 2.383 1.071 0.863 93.83 21.549
Composite NOX : 0.390 0.391 0.632 0.451 0.380 0.160 0.190 1.019 1.23 0.496
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 14.87 13.04 14.43 13.39 0.746 0.296 26.433
CO Running: 11.71 8.74 10.06 9.07 1.637 0.775 67.400
CO Total Exhaust: 26.58 21.78 24.49 22.45 36.11 2.383 1.071 0.863 93.83 21.549
NOx Start: 0.062 0.057 0.099 0.067 0.004 0.003 0.411
NOx Running: 0.328 0.335 0.532 0.384 0.156 0.187 0.822
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.390 0.391 0.632 0.451 0.380 0.160 0.190 1.019 1.23 0.496
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 27.45 20.30 24.79 23.73 1.046 1.081
Composite NOX : 0.542 0.352 0.592 0.734 0.150 0.207
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 13.81 12.84 14.43 14.45 0.306 0.291
CO Running: 13.63 7.46 10.36 9.29 0.740 0.789
CO Total Exhaust: 27.45 20.30 24.79 23.73 1.046 1.081
NOx Start: 0.091 0.048 0.092 0.117 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.451 0.304 0.499 0.616 0.147 0.203
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.542 0.352 0.592 0.734 0.150 0.207
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 54.50 2.664 1.197
Composite NOX : 0.495 4.278 1.724
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 54.50 2.664 1.197
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.495 4.278 1.724
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 10.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 22.14 18.58 20.81 19.14 24.02 1.875 0.830 0.595 58.81 17.871
Composite NOX : 0.324 0.323 0.526 0.374 0.400 0.133 0.158 0.846 1.15 0.415
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 14.87 13.04 14.43 13.39 0.746 0.296 26.433
CO Running: 7.27 5.54 6.38 5.75 1.129 0.535 32.380
CO Total Exhaust: 22.14 18.58 20.81 19.14 24.02 1.875 0.830 0.595 58.81 17.871
NOx Start: 0.062 0.057 0.099 0.067 0.004 0.003 0.411
NOx Running: 0.262 0.267 0.426 0.306 0.129 0.155 0.743
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.324 0.323 0.526 0.374 0.400 0.133 0.158 0.846 1.15 0.415
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 22.45 17.57 21.00 20.34 0.816 0.836
Composite NOX : 0.452 0.290 0.492 0.612 0.125 0.172
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 13.81 12.84 14.43 14.45 0.306 0.291
CO Running: 8.64 4.73 6.57 5.89 0.510 0.544
CO Total Exhaust: 22.45 17.57 21.00 20.34 0.816 0.836
NOx Start: 0.091 0.048 0.092 0.117 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.361 0.242 0.399 0.495 0.122 0.169
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.452 0.290 0.492 0.612 0.125 0.172
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 36.26 1.837 0.825
Composite NOX : 0.520 3.535 1.429
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 36.26 1.837 0.825
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.520 3.535 1.429
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 18.6
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 25.3 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 36.9 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.7 psi
Weathered RVP: 14.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.23 17.16 19.19 17.66 13.48 1.404 0.607 0.347 43.37 16.036
Composite NOX : 0.265 0.263 0.433 0.305 0.434 0.105 0.125 0.665 1.23 0.341
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 14.87 13.04 14.43 13.39 0.746 0.296 26.433
CO Running: 5.37 4.12 4.75 4.28 0.658 0.312 16.941
CO Total Exhaust: 20.23 17.16 19.19 17.66 13.48 1.404 0.607 0.347 43.37 16.036
NOx Start: 0.062 0.057 0.099 0.067 0.004 0.003 0.411
NOx Running: 0.203 0.206 0.333 0.238 0.102 0.122 0.815
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.265 0.263 0.433 0.305 0.434 0.105 0.125 0.665 1.23 0.341
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.20 16.36 19.32 18.84 0.603 0.609
Composite NOX : 0.372 0.234 0.404 0.506 0.099 0.136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 13.81 12.84 14.43 14.45 0.306 0.291
CO Running: 6.38 3.53 4.89 4.39 0.298 0.318
CO Total Exhaust: 20.20 16.36 19.32 18.84 0.603 0.609
NOx Start: 0.091 0.048 0.092 0.117 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.281 0.186 0.311 0.389 0.096 0.133
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.372 0.234 0.404 0.506 0.099 0.136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.35 1.072 0.481
Composite NOX : 0.565 2.761 1.121
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 20.35 1.072 0.481
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.565 2.761 1.121
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 2.5
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 17.51 14.51 16.83 15.09 39.79 2.731 1.255 1.032 129.98 15.318
Composite NOX : 0.452 0.407 0.631 0.463 0.303 0.167 0.211 1.082 1.08 0.523
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.04 3.55 4.48 3.78 0.744 0.300 9.995
CO Running: 14.48 10.96 12.34 11.30 1.987 0.955 119.981
CO Total Exhaust: 17.51 14.51 16.83 15.09 39.79 2.731 1.255 1.032 129.98 15.318
NOx Start: 0.052 0.050 0.084 0.059 0.004 0.003 0.398
NOx Running: 0.400 0.357 0.547 0.404 0.164 0.208 0.683
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.452 0.407 0.631 0.463 0.303 0.167 0.211 1.082 1.08 0.523
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 20.02 13.08 17.18 15.93 1.221 1.269
Composite NOX : 0.563 0.367 0.595 0.724 0.167 0.229
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.20 3.64 4.44 4.58 0.309 0.296
CO Running: 16.82 9.43 12.73 11.35 0.912 0.973
CO Total Exhaust: 20.02 13.08 17.18 15.93 1.221 1.269
NOx Start: 0.080 0.042 0.079 0.098 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.483 0.324 0.516 0.625 0.164 0.226
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.563 0.367 0.595 0.724 0.167 0.229
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 60.43 3.139 1.401
Composite NOX : 0.401 4.579 1.812
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 60.43 3.139 1.401
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.401 4.579 1.812
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 5.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 11.08 9.89 11.60 10.32 31.80 2.366 1.079 0.842 79.11 10.401
Composite NOX : 0.388 0.358 0.554 0.407 0.311 0.151 0.190 0.973 1.01 0.462
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.04 3.55 4.48 3.78 0.744 0.300 9.995
CO Running: 8.04 6.34 7.12 6.54 1.622 0.780 69.118
CO Total Exhaust: 11.08 9.89 11.60 10.32 31.80 2.366 1.079 0.842 79.11 10.401
NOx Start: 0.052 0.050 0.084 0.059 0.004 0.003 0.398
NOx Running: 0.336 0.308 0.470 0.348 0.147 0.187 0.613
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.388 0.358 0.554 0.407 0.311 0.151 0.190 0.973 1.01 0.462
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 12.94 9.10 11.79 11.13 1.054 1.090
Composite NOX : 0.494 0.322 0.522 0.635 0.150 0.206
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.20 3.64 4.44 4.58 0.309 0.296
CO Running: 9.74 5.46 7.34 6.55 0.745 0.794
CO Total Exhaust: 12.94 9.10 11.79 11.13 1.054 1.090
NOx Start: 0.080 0.042 0.079 0.098 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.414 0.280 0.443 0.537 0.147 0.203
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.494 0.322 0.522 0.635 0.150 0.206
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 48.28 2.562 1.144
Composite NOX : 0.411 4.108 1.627
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 48.28 2.562 1.144
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.411 4.108 1.627
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 10.0
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 8.02 7.61 9.04 7.97 21.15 1.863 0.837 0.581 43.20 7.680
Composite NOX : 0.309 0.293 0.457 0.334 0.327 0.126 0.158 0.808 0.95 0.381
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.04 3.55 4.48 3.78 0.744 0.300 9.995
CO Running: 4.98 4.06 4.55 4.18 1.119 0.538 33.205
CO Total Exhaust: 8.02 7.61 9.04 7.97 21.15 1.863 0.837 0.581 43.20 7.680
NOx Start: 0.052 0.050 0.084 0.059 0.004 0.003 0.398
NOx Running: 0.257 0.243 0.373 0.275 0.122 0.155 0.554
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.309 0.293 0.457 0.334 0.327 0.126 0.158 0.808 0.95 0.381
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 9.44 7.14 9.14 8.77 0.822 0.843
Composite NOX : 0.408 0.263 0.430 0.526 0.125 0.172
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.20 3.64 4.44 4.58 0.309 0.296
CO Running: 6.24 3.49 4.70 4.19 0.514 0.548
CO Total Exhaust: 9.44 7.14 9.14 8.77 0.822 0.843
NOx Start: 0.080 0.042 0.079 0.098 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.327 0.221 0.351 0.427 0.122 0.168
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.408 0.263 0.430 0.526 0.125 0.172
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 32.12 1.767 0.789
Composite NOX : 0.432 3.395 1.348
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 32.12 1.767 0.789
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.432 3.395 1.348
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8.
*#########################
* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels
* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV
* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels
* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV
* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels
* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV
* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV
* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates
* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV
M583 Warning:
The user supplied arterial average speed of 18.6
will be used for all hours of the day. 100% of VMT
has been assigned to the arterial/collector roadway
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
type for all hours of the day and all vehicle types.
* Reading start SOAK distribution from the following external
* data file: ALLCOLDSTARTSOAK.D
M111 Warning:
The input dIesel sulfur level of 350.0 ppm exceeds
the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm.
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Altitude: Low
Minimum Temperature: 64.9 (F)
Maximum Temperature: 86.2 (F)
Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb
Nominal Fuel RVP: 8.9 psi
Weathered RVP: 8.7 psi
Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Exhaust I/M Program: No
Evap I/M Program: No
ATP Program: No
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 6.59 6.47 7.78 6.80 11.87 1.397 0.613 0.339 27.37 6.189
Composite NOX : 0.243 0.236 0.373 0.270 0.355 0.100 0.125 0.636 1.01 0.309
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.04 3.55 4.48 3.78 0.744 0.300 9.995
CO Running: 3.56 2.92 3.30 3.02 0.653 0.314 17.373
CO Total Exhaust: 6.59 6.47 7.78 6.80 11.87 1.397 0.613 0.339 27.37 6.189
NOx Start: 0.052 0.050 0.084 0.059 0.004 0.003 0.398
NOx Running: 0.191 0.186 0.289 0.212 0.096 0.122 0.608
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.243 0.236 0.373 0.270 0.355 0.100 0.125 0.636 1.01 0.309
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 7.66 6.16 7.84 7.62 0.608 0.615
Composite NOX : 0.332 0.211 0.350 0.431 0.099 0.136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Start: 3.20 3.64 4.44 4.58 0.309 0.296
CO Running: 4.46 2.52 3.40 3.04 0.300 0.319
CO Total Exhaust: 7.66 6.16 7.84 7.62 0.608 0.615
NOx Start: 0.080 0.042 0.079 0.098 0.003 0.003
NOx Running: 0.252 0.169 0.271 0.333 0.096 0.132
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.332 0.211 0.350 0.431 0.099 0.136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Composite CO : 18.03 1.031 0.460
Composite NOX : 0.470 2.653 1.058
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exhaust emissions (g/mi):
CO Total Exhaust: 18.03 1.031 0.460
NOx Total Exhaust: 0.470 2.653 1.058
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------***************************************************************************
* MOBILE6C 6.2 (14-Oct-2004) *
* Input file: TTC21COLDSTART.IN (file 1, run 1). *
***************************************************************************
*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, Jan. Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: Jan.
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2670 0.4210 0.1394 0.0391 0.0027 0.0126 0.1146 0.0036 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0106 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0176 0.0046 0.0137 ------ 0.0017
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0050 0.0066 0.0081 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0117 0.0262 0.0176 0.0414 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0195 0.0335 0.0249 0.0519 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1221 0.2809 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0873 0.3336 0.1001 0.0393 0.0036 0.0090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0060 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0086 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0198 0.0167
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0271 0.0240
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0160 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0262 0.0173
OCARBON: ------ 0.0206 0.0136
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0171 0.0823 0.0559
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0254 0.0906 0.0643
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 2.5 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 5.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 10.0 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*#########################
* 2021, 18.65 mph, 100%Cold, PM2.5, July Temp.&RVP
* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8.
*#########################
Calendar Year: 2021
Month: July
Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 25. ppm
Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 350. ppm
Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns
Reformulated Gas: No
Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh
GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Distribution: 0.2668 0.4208 0.1398 0.0393 0.0027 0.0121 0.1148 0.0037 1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ ------ 0.0000 0.0000
GASPM: 0.0034 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0103 ------ ------ ------ 0.0142 0.0032
ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0169 0.0046 0.0135 ------ 0.0016
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0048 0.0066 0.0079 ------ 0.0010
SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0011 0.0036 0.0064 0.0197 0.0001 0.0028
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0114 0.0253 0.0175 0.0411 0.0143 0.0087
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0025 0.0020 0.0020 0.0052 0.0010 0.0024
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0193 0.0326 0.0248 0.0515 0.0207 0.0164
SO2: 0.0056 0.0073 0.0096 0.0079 0.0141 0.0686 0.1220 0.2811 0.0027 0.0404
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 LDDT12 LDDT34
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0869 0.3338 0.1002 0.0396 0.0035 0.0086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 0.0033 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0059 0.0040
OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0085 0.0058
SO4: 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0053 0.0068
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0196 0.0166
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Total PM: 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0270 0.0239
SO2: 0.0073 0.0073 0.0096 0.0096 0.1006 0.1308
NH3: 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.1017 0.0068 0.0068
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL
------ ------ -----VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0008 0.0025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):
Lead: 0.0000 ------ -----GASPM: 0.0157 ------ -----ECARBON: ------ 0.0257 0.0168
OCARBON: ------ 0.0202 0.0132
SO4: 0.0011 0.0355 0.0251
Total Exhaust PM: 0.0168 0.0814 0.0551
Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053
Tire: 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030
Total PM: 0.0252 0.0897 0.0635
SO2: 0.0211 0.5075 0.3580
NH3: 0.0451 0.0270 0.0270
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
APPENDIX F
INTERSECTION SIGNAL TIMES
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009
Project: 33015719
Yonge Subway Extension
Air Quality Assessment
Table F-1
PM Peak-Hour Intersection Signal Times
Red time (s)
Movement
Steeles/Yonge
Langstaff/Yonge
Garden/Yonge
North-South/South-North
60
38
41
East-West/West-East
66
86
58
URS Canada Inc.
January 27, 2009