Instructional Program Review Template for Academic Year 2013-2014

advertisement
http://www.redwoods.edu/programreview/13-14Templates.asp
Instructional Program Review Template for Academic Year 2013-2014
(fields will expand as you type)
Please provide a concise response to all questions, and include relevant details in direct support of your responses. Bulleted lists may be used
to clearly organize information.
Section 1 - Program Information
1.0 Name of Program:
Date:
1.1 Program Review Authors (include names and campus locations):
1.2 Dean’s Signature:
Date:
1.3 Individual Program Information
# of Degrees offered:
# of Certificates offered:
1.3.1 State briefly how the program functions support the college mission:
1.3.2 State briefly program highlights/accomplishments:
Section 2 - Data Analysis
2.1 Enrollment & Fill Rate
Enrollment ☐
Fill Rate ☐
PROC-8
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates
Comment if checked:
Comment if checked:
10/3/2013
Page 1
2.2 Program Majors
Enrollment ☐
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates
Comment if checked:
Comment if checked:
Fill Rate ☐
2.3 Success & Retention
Success ☐
Retention ☐
2.4 Persistence
☐
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Success & Retention
Comment if checked:
Comment if checked:
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Persistence of Concentrators
Comment:
2.5 Completers Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to:
http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Persistence of Concentrators
Comment:
☐
2.6 Program Completers
☐
PROC-8
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Completions & Transfers
Comment:
10/3/2013
Page 2
Student Equity Group Data
2.7 Enrollments
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
by group
Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to Enrollments & fill rates
Comment:
2.8 Success & Retention
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
by group
Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to success & retention
Comment:
2.9 Completers
by group
Faculty Information
2.10 Faculty
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to persistence
Comment:
Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Faculty (FT/PT) & FTES/FTEF
Comment:
CTE/Occupational programs
The following Labor Market section should be completed by all CTE/Occupational programs.
Only CTE/Occupational programs need to complete this section (2.9).
2.9 Labor Market Data
Refer to the California Employment Development Division:
http://www.edd.ca.gov/
www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov
Provide a narrative that addresses the following:
PROC-8
10/3/2013
Page 3
a. Documentation of labor market demand
b. Non-duplication of other training programs in the region
c. Effectiveness as measured by student employment and program completions.
Narrative:
Summary of Section 2
Overall, what did you learn from the data provided in this section? Be sure to indicate if your discoveries apply to the entire district, or if they
vary by site.
Section 3 – Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities
Curriculum & Assessment Data
What courses, if any are not on track with regard to a 2-year assessment cycle? Explain if this is a consequence of
how often the course is offered or other mitigating factors such as outcome updates that may have changed the
assessment cycle.
# of course SLO reports submitted during 2012-2013.
Reports submitted in 2012-13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012-2013.
# of degree/cert (PLO) reports submitted during 2012-2013.
Reports submitted in 2012-13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012-2013.
% of Course Outlines of Record up to date. Includes approvals through spring 2013.
Explain any mitigating circumstances.
Indicate if you have submitted updated Course Outlines of Record this fall.
If there is no plan for updating outdated curriculum, when will you inactivate?
View curriculum status: click here or go to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp
Select your program and click on: Curriculum Status
Did the Program Advisory Committee Meet in the last year? Y/N
Click here to view the Program Advisory Committee webpage
PROC-8
10/3/2013
Page 4
3.1 What changes have been made to the program based on assessment findings? You may include results from your closing the loop reports
that map to your program.
3.2 (Optional) Describe assessment findings/observations that may require further research or institutional support.
Summary of Section 3
Provide any additional explanations for items described in section 3.
Section – 4 Evaluation of Previous Plans
4.1 Describe plans/actions identified in the last program review and their current status. What measurable outcomes were achieved due to
actions completed.
Action plans may encompass several years; an update on the current status, or whether the plan was discarded and why.
Click here to view completed program reviews from last year.
Actions Taken
PROC-8
Current Status
10/3/2013
Impact of Action (describe all relevant
data used to evaluate the impact)
Page 5
4.2 (If applicable) Describe how funds provided in support of the plan(s) contributed to program improvement:
Section – 5 Planning
Click here to link to Institutional Planning Documents
5.1 Program Plans
Based on data analysis, student learning outcomes and program indicators, assessment and review, and your critical reflections, describe the
actions to be taken for the 2013-2014 academic year. Use as many rows as you have actions, and add additional rows if you have more than 5
actions. Please number all rows that you add.
Please be specific. This section and section 6 should include a detailed justification so that the resource prioritization committees understand
your needs and their importance.
* Not all actions in this program plan section may require resources, but all resource requests must be linked to this section.
5.1 Program Plans
Action #
Action to be taken:
List the specific action
to be taken in enough
detail so that someone
outside of your area can
understand.
Relationship to Institutional
Plans
Include the specific plan and
action item relevant to your
action to be taken.
For example: Annual Plan 20132014 Theme: Persistence; or
Goal 1: Student Success:
EP.1.6.2 Develop a plan for
narrowing the achievement gap
for underrepresented student
populations.
Expected Impact on
Program/Student Learning
Describe the expected impact in a way
that someone outside the program can
understand. The impact should be
measurable.
1
2
3
PROC-8
10/3/2013
Page 6
Relationship to
Assessment
Include all
assessment results
that indicate that this
action will yield the
desired impact on the
program. If the
assessment has yet to
be conducted, explain
when and how it will
be conducted.
Resources
Needed
(Y/N)
A yes here
requires a
corresponding
request in the
next section.
4
5
6
5.2 Provide any additional information, brief definitions, descriptions, comments, or explanations, if necessary.
Section 6 - Resource Requests
6.0 Planning Related, Operational, and Personnel Resource Requests. Requests must be accompanied by an action plan in the above section.
Requests should include estimated costs. Submit a support ticket if you do not know the estimated costs.
If you are requesting personnel resources, you must also include the “Request for Faculty or Staffing” forms, located at
inside.redwoods.edu/program review. Submit one form for each request.
Additional Instructions:

Put down the full amount you are requesting in the “Amount” column. Put down the annual amount of any ongoing or recurring costs in the “Annual
Recurring” column. For example, a personnel request for a permanent position might show an Amount of $30,000 and an Annual Recurring Cost of
$30,000. A request for equipment might show an Amount of $5,000 and an Annual Recurring cost of $200. A professional development request might
show an Amount of $800 and a recurring cost of $0.

If you have a grant or some other source of funding, include in the “Request” column a brief description of the source of funds and the dollar amount
that is expected to be covered by the other source and if the other source covers any of the annual recurring costs.

Note in the “Request” column if this is a repeat request, and how many times you have submitted this request.
The item number must match the corresponding action # from section 5. Add rows as necessary.
Type of Request (Check One)
Action
#
use #
above
PROC-8
Request
Describe your request here in a way that someone
outside the program can understand.
10/3/2013
Planning
To be
reviewed by
Prioritization
Committees
of the
Budget
Planning
Committee
Operational
Personnel
Professional
Development
To be
reviewed
and grouped
by Associate
Deans.
To be
reviewed by
Faculty
Prioritization
Committee.
To be
reviewed by
the
Professional
Development
Committee
Page 7
$
Amount
$ Annual
Recurring
Costs
Contact
Person
(Name,
email,
phone)
Section 7-Author Feedback
Provide any constructive feedback about how this template or datasets could be improved.
How much do you agree with the following statements? (mark your choice with an x )
Strongly Somewhat
Somewhat Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Agree
Disagree Disagree
This year’s program review was valuable
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
in planning for the ongoing improvement
of my program.
Analysis of the program review data was
useful in assessing my program.
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Section 8- PRC Response by section (completed by PRC after reviewing the program review)
8.0 The response will be forwarded to the author and the supervising Director and Vice President:
S.1. Program Information:
S.2. Data Analysis:
S.3. Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities:
S.4. Evaluation of Previous Plans:
S.5. Planning:
S.6. Resource Requests:
PROC-8
10/3/2013
Page 8
Download