SACS Comprehensive Standards

advertisement
SACS Comprehensive Standards
Section 3.5: Comprehensive Standards__Undergraduate Programs
Requirements, Standards and Regulations and Rationale
3.5.1 The institution identifies college-level general education competencies and the
extent to which graduates have attained them. (College-level competencies)
Rationale: Since college-level competencies are central to educational programs, this
standard assumes that the institution will define specifically which competencies are
appropriate to the goals of its general education program and consistent with principles
of good practice. The institution is responsible for identifying measures to ensure that
students have attained those competencies.
Note: This standard addresses college-level competencies within the general education
core; it does not require a specific course to address each competency.
Supporting Document
Examples
Documents identifying collegelevel competencies within the
general education requirements
and identifying methods of
assessment by the institution
Evidence of achievement of
college-level competencies that
are expected of students who
complete the general education
requirements.
Identification of competencies
What are the specific collegelevel competencies within the
general education program?
Documentation of justification
for defining and evaluating the
college-level general education
competencies
Evidence that graduates of
undergraduate degree programs
have attained the college-level
competencies
3.5.2 At least 25 percent of the credit hours required for the degree are
earned through instruction offered by the institution awarding the degree. In the case of
undergraduate degree programs offered through joint, cooperative, or consortia
arrangements, the student earns 25 percent of the credits required for the degree through
instruction offered by the participating institutions. (See Commission policy “The
Transfer or Transcripting of Academic Credit.”) (Institutional credits for a degree)
Catalog
Rationale: This standard establishes the general principle that if an institution awards
an academic degree, then it is responsible for the delivery of an appropriate portion of
the academic experiences applicable to the degree. The standard also establishes the
threshold for determining the acceptable portion of coursework that the institution ought
to provide for the degree.
Evidence that at least 25 percent
of the credits required for the
degree have been taken at the
institution
Applicable degree completion
policies
Note: The Commission’s policy, “The Transfer or Transcripting of Academic Credit,”
provides for the term “institution” to be interpreted as a “system of statewide
institutions” when it is a formal consortium of institutions accredited by the
Commission on Colleges.
Evidence, Questions to
Consider
Other documents containing
policy on amount of credit
which must be earned through
instruction by the institution
What evidence is available to
show that students have attained
these competencies?
How does the institution
demonstrate that it identifies
competencies that are collegelevel?
What evidence exists that the
institution has a policy stating
the amount of credit that must be
earned through instruction by the
institution?
How does the institution monitor
the amount of credit earned at
the institution with respect to the
total number of credits required
for the degree?
If an institution is part of a
consortium, how is the policy on
transfer and transcripts of
academic credit implemented?
Page 1 of 3
SACS Comprehensive Standards
Section 3.5: Comprehensive Standards__Undergraduate Programs
Requirements, Standards and Regulations and Rationale
Supporting Document
Examples
Evidence, Questions to
Consider
How are the policies
disseminated?
How does an institution identify
on its transcript the name of the
institution from which a course
was taken?
3.5.3 The institution defines and publishes requirements for its undergraduate programs,
including its general education components. These
requirements conform to commonly accepted standards and practices
for degree programs. (Undergraduate program requirements)
Other documents describing
general education and major
program requirements for all
programs
Rationale: The institution is responsible for determining course learning outcomes for
each educational program. The general education program defines the underlying
learning experience that supports the institution’s mission and traditionally provides the
“breadth” component to an undergraduate education. Through general education,
students encounter the basic content and methodology of the principal areas of
knowledge that introduce a breadth of knowledge and reinforce cognitive skills and
affective learning opportunities for each student. An effective general education
program has underlying rationale and design with goals consistent with the mission of
the institution.
Major program requirements allow for an integrated understanding of the discipline.
Such programs display a clear rationale and design and include clearly stated and
measurable goals consistent with the mission of the institution. Each major course of
study identifies courses that are designed as introductions to the major, required courses,
electives, capstone courses, and any corequisite courses. Interdisciplinary or
multidisciplinary majors, or majors within traditional disciplines that deviate
substantially from commonly accepted major requirements, require a greater degree of
definition and rationale.
For all programs, evidence that
the institution has published
documents, including the catalog
and recruitment materials, that
describe general education
program completion
requirements
For major program requirements
and the general education
program, 1) comparative data for
degree programs with peer
institutions, 2) professional
accreditation, and 3) external
program reviews
Minutes
of
curriculum
committee meetings
Evidence that requirements
conform to commonly accepted
standards and practices
For each undergraduate degree
program, what evidence exists
that the institution 1) designs
each program, 2) publishes goals
for each program, and 3)
provides an identifiable set of
experiences for students in each
program?
What is the process for
determining what coursework is
included in the general education
requirements?
How does the institution provide
information about its educational
programs, including philosophy,
goals, and required courses, that
is sufficient for a student to
make informed choices?
What role does the faculty play
in the design and assessment of
each program?
Page 2 of 3
SACS Comprehensive Standards
Section 3.5: Comprehensive Standards__Undergraduate Programs
Requirements, Standards and Regulations and Rationale
Supporting Document
Examples
Evidence, Questions to
Consider
How does the institution
demonstrate that all appropriate
documents, print and otherwise,
provide clear, complete, and
consistent information about
each major program?
3.5.4 At least 25 percent of the discipline course hours in each major at the
baccalaureate level are taught by faculty members holding the terminal
degree—usually the earned doctorate—in the discipline, or the
equivalent of the terminal degree. (Terminal degrees of faculty)
Page 3 of 3
Download