Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- U...

advertisement
Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- U...
https://www.acs.utah.edu/prod/evaluations/evaluation-report...
course evaluations
University of Utah
Course and Instructor Evaluation Report
Summer 2008
College/School:
College of Science
Instructor:
GUAJARDO,JENNIFER L;
Subject:
Course #: 1070 - 070
Enrollment: 23
Mathematics
Evaluations processed: 21
Intro Stat Inference
Course:
Print Date: 13-Aug-08
UU Standard Course Items
N SD
1. The course objectives were clearly stated.
21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 5.81 5.25
2. The course objectives were met.
21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.8% 76.2% 5.76 5.17
3. The course content was well organized.
21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 14.3% 81.0% 5.76 5.19
4. The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.
20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 15.0% 80.0% 5.75 5.10
5. Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.
21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 5.81 5.22
6. I learned a great deal in this course.
21 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 9.5%
85.7% 5.76 5.13
7. Overall, this was an effective course.
21 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 9.5%
85.7% 5.81 5.11
Composite score: 5.78
D
MD
MA
A
SA
Avg S.Avg
Subject composite score: 5.17
UU Standard Instructor Items Guajardo,Jennifer L
N SD
1. The instructor was organized.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 5.95 5.30
D
MD
MA
A
SA
Avg S.Avg
2. The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% 5.89 5.46
3. The instructor presented course content effectively.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% 5.79 5.17
4. The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was respectful. 19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% 5.89 5.43
5. As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% 5.89 5.32
6. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 5.95 5.36
7. Overall, this was an effective instructor.
19 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% 5.89 5.28
Composite score: 5.89
Subject composite score: 5.33
N = number of responses
SD = Strongly Disagree (response value 1)
D = Disagree (response value 2)
MD = Mildly Disagree (response value 3)
MA = Mildly Agree (response value 4)
A = Agree (response value 5)
SA = Strongly Agree (response value 6)
S.Avg = Subject-wide Average for this question
Get Written Comments Report
DISCLAIMER: Department composite scores are current as of the date of this report, but may be revised if
additional evaluations are processed.
1 of 1
8/13/08 11:33 AM
Download