Successional trajectories of >30-year- old crested wheatgrass seedings GBNPSIP 2009 Tom Monaco

advertisement
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
GBNPSIP 2009
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Successional trajectories of >30-yearold crested wheatgrass seedings
Tom Monaco
USDA-ARS
Utah State University, Logan, Utah
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
FRRL Mission Statement
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Provide an array of improved plant materials and management alternatives for sustainable stewardship of rangelands and pastures in the western U.S.
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Overview
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
•
•
•
•
•
Historical use of crested wheatgrass. community phases. Seed bank.
Role of soil and disturbance history. Updated state‐and‐transition model.
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Historical Perspective
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
•
•
•
•
•
•
Why was crested wheatgrass seeded?
Degraded shrub‐steppe rangelands
– Overgrazing
– Exotic weed invasion
– Halogeton Control Act of 1952.
Abandoned farmland
– BankHead‐Jones Land
– Soil loss and erosion
Competitive
Adapted
Long‐lived
Met practical needs
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
What successional trajectories have these
ecosystems taken?
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Common assumptions ‐
• Low diversity and near monoculture, even after 50 years?
• Shrub dominated?
• Functioning as stable, naturalized shrub‐steppe?
R.E. Rosiere
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Objectives
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• Identify ‘dominant’ indicator species.
• Determine whether distinct successional phases exist.
• Identify soil and ground cover attributes related to variation in phases.
• Determine seed bank composition.
• Characterize influence of soils, disturbance history, elevation, and topography on vegetation attributes.
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Wyoming big sagebrush communities historically
seeded with crested wheatgrass
• Site selection criteria:
– Seedings greater than 30 years old. – Never burned or retreated chemically or mechanically
since establishment.
– Have similar historic grazing histories.
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Typical looking historic crested wheatgrass seeding ?
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Modified-Whittaker Plots (Stohlgren et al. 1995)
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
4 ‐ plots per community
% Canopy cover Ground cover
Species richness
Diversity index
Soils ‐ 15 cm
– texture
– nitrogen, carbon, pH
• Seed Banks
•
•
•
•
•
•
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Results – indicator species
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• Communities clustered into four phases.
• Indicator species differ for phases.
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Community Phases
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
1- CRESTED dominated
3 - HERB/SHRUB co-dominated
2 - HERBACEOUS dominated
4 - SHRUB dominated
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Seed banks description
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• 47 species. • 13 common species.
• Few species were normally distributed.
Mean Density
Seed m-2
# of
Communities
2303
27
Agropyron cristatum
337
32
Poa secunda
239
24
Poa bulbosa
135
19
Bromus tectorum
106
12
Descurainia sophia
84
27
Artemesia tridentata
49
21
Collinsia parviflora
45
6
Alyssum desertorum
35
8
Hackelia micrantha
22
10
Microsteris gracilis
17
5
Halogeton glomerotus
16
10
Erigeron spp.
15
5
Species
Ranunculus testiculatus
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Results ‐ Soils
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• Soil texture, chemistry, and ground cover varies among phase
• Vegetation and ground cover also varies with soil texture
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Results ‐ Disturbance history
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• Disturbance history depends on soil texture
• Combined, soils and cropping status determine vegetation of communities
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Seeded
community
state-and transition
model
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Conclusions
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
• In absence of fire, herbicide, and mechanical treatments, 4 distinct community phases are possible.
• Pre‐existing soil attributes, disturbance history, and topography drive succession.
• Updated STM provides insights for management. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
The Cheatgrass
Problem
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Huge problems require sound strategies
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Manage vegetation
Desired
condition
Stabilize soils
minimize disturbance
Cheatgrass dominated
adapted from Bob Nowak, UNR
FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY
Ecologically-Based Invasive Plant Management
PLANTS FOR THE WEST
Site Assessment
Causes of
change
Processes
Impacted
Utah DWR
Pickett et al. 1987
Sheley et al. 1996
Krueger-Mangold et al. 2006
Site
Availability
Disturbance
Species
Availability
Dispersal &
Seed abundance
Soil Resources
Species
Performance Competition
Download