Vegetation responses to climate change: simulations for Beringia

advertisement

Vegetation responses to climate change:

11 ka, 6 ka, and 21st century vegetation simulations for Beringia

Sarah L. Shafer 1 , Patrick J. Bartlein 2 , Mary E. Edwards 3 , and Steven W. Hostetler 1

1 U.S. Geological Survey, Corvallis, OR

2 Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Oregon, Eugene, OR

3 School of Geography, Univ. of Southampton, UK and

Alaska Quaternary Center, Univ. of Alaska-Fairbanks, AK

What can past vegetation responses to warmerthan-present climates tell us about potential vegetation responses to future climate change in

Beringia?

Examples: 6 ka and 11 ka

• greater summer insolation than present

• warmer growing season temperatures

• deciduous forest expansion

Beringia – RegCM2 domain

July insolation anomaly (45°N)

Figure: Millspaugh et al. 2000

(Edwards et al. 2005)

Vegetation Model

BIOME4 (Kaplan 2001)

• equilibrium biogeography model

• simulates biomes based on plant functional types (e.g., needleleaf evergreen trees, grass)

• simulates the physiological response of vegetation to changes in atmospheric CO

2 concentrations

Modern Climate Data

• CRU TS 2.1 1901-2002 (Mitchell and Jones 2005)

• 1961-1990 30-year mean

Modern Vegetation

Boundary Conditions

Simulated Vegetation

1961-1990 30-yr mean

340 ppm CO

2

Paleoclimate Simulations for 6 ka and 11 ka

• Regional Climate Model: RegCM2

--Genesis 2.0, an atmospheric general circulation model with a mixed-layer ocean

-- ~45-km grid cell resolution

• Boundary conditions: pre-11 ka –

• Bering land bridge exposed

• absence of thaw lakes

• tundra vegetation post-11 ka –

• flooding of Bering land bridge

• development of thaw lakes

• replacement of shrub tundra by forest

6 ka – modern conditions

11 ka Anomalies

Jan

11 ka compared to

1961-1990 30-year mean

Mar

Temperature

Pre-11 ka Post-11 ka

Precipitation

Pre-11 ka Post-11 ka

May

Jul

Sep

Nov

Simulated Vegetation

Pre-11 ka

270 ppm CO

2

Simulated Vegetation

Post-11 ka

270 ppm CO

2

Simulated Modern

1961-1990 30-yr mean

340 ppm CO

2

Simulated Vegetation

Post-11 ka

270 ppm CO

2

6 ka Anomalies

Jan

Temperature Precipitation

6 ka compared to

1961-1990 30-year mean

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Nov

Simulated Modern

1961-1990 30-yr mean

340 ppm CO

2

Simulated 6 ka

280 ppm CO

2

FUTURE VEGETATION CHANGE

Two hypotheses (Edwards et al. 2005):

1. Expansion of current evergreen needleleaf forest

2. Development of deciduous forest in tundra areas similar to the vegetation at 11 ka

FUTURE CLIMATE DATA

AOGCMs (atmosphere-ocean general circulation models):

• HadCM3 (Flato 2005)

• CGCM3.1 (Collins et al. 2006)

• CCSM3.0 (Gordon et al. 2000)

Time period: 2071-2100 30-year mean

Atmospheric CO

2 concentration: 540 ppm

Emissions scenario: IPCC SRES B1

IPCC Emission Scenarios

Storylines:

A2—slower economic growth, high population growth

A1B—rapid economic growth, low population growth

B1—slow economic growth, low population growth

(T. Wigley; Taylor 2004)

TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES

Jan

HadCM3 CGCM3.1 CCSM3.0

2071-2100 30-year mean

540 ppm CO

2

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Nov

PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES

2071-2100 30-year mean

540 ppm CO

2

Jan

Mar

HadCM3 CGCM3.1 CCSM3.0

May

Jul

Sep

Nov

Simulated Future Vegetation

2071-2100 30-yr mean

540 ppm CO

2

HadCM3

CGCM3.1

CCSM3.0

Simulated Modern

1961-1990 30-yr mean

340 ppm CO

2

Simulated Future

2071-2100 30-yr mean

540 ppm CO

2

Expansion of:

• Evergreen forest

• Deciduous forest

(western Beringia)

• Grassland and desert

HadCM3

Summary

• Deciduous forest expansion is simulated at 6 ka and 11 ka, consistent with the paleorecord

Modern

6 ka

• Both evergreen and deciduous forest are simulated to expand under future climates

11 ka

• Tundra is simulated to contract under future climates

2071-2100

HadCM3

Climate Data Acknowledgements:

IPCC AR4: We acknowledge the international modeling groups for providing their data for analysis, the Program for Climate

Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) for collecting and archiving the model data, the JSC/CLIVAR Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) and their Coupled Model

Intercomparison Project (CMIP) and Climate Simulation Panel for organizing the model data analysis activity, and the IPCC

WG1 TSU for technical support. The IPCC Data Archive at

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is supported by the

Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.

11 ka Experiments

FUTURE CLIMATE DATA

AOGCMs (atmosphere-ocean general circulation models):

HadCM3

CGCM13.1

CCSM3.0

Time period: 2071-2100 30-year mean

Atmospheric CO2 concentration: 540 ppm

Emissions scenario: IPCC SRES B1

Jul

Sep

Nov

Jan

TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES

HadCM3 CGCM3.1 CCSM3.0

HadCM3 CGCM3.1 CCSM3.0

Mar

May

Simulated Vegetation

11 ka, 270 ppm CO

2

CONCLUSIONS

(ADD TEXT—END OF SLIDES)

Simulated Vegetation

Post-11 ka, 270 ppm CO

2

Simulated Vegetation

HadCM3, 2071-2100, 540 ppm CO

2

Simulated Vegetation

1961-1990 30-yr mean, 340 ppm CO

2

Simulated Vegetation

6 ka, 280 ppm CO

2

Download