Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- Univer...

advertisement
Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- Univer...
https://www.acs.utah.edu/uofu/stu/evaluation-report?cmd=DETA...
course evaluations
University of Utah
Course and Instructor Evaluation Report
Spring 2009
College/School:
College of Science
Instructor:
RASSOUL-AGHA,FIRAS;
Subject:
Mathematics
Stat'l Inference II
Course:
Print Date: 28-May-09
Course #:
5090 - 001
Enrollment: 21
Evaluations processed:
N SD
1. The course objectives were clearly stated.
17 11.8% 0.0%
0.0% 11.8% 52.9% 23.5% 4.65 5.13
2. The course objectives were met.
17 11.8% 0.0%
0.0% 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% 4.53 5.09
3. The course content was well organized.
17 0.0%
4. The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.
17 17.6% 0.0%
5. Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.
17 5.9%
6. I learned a great deal in this course.
17 11.8% 0.0%
0.0% 5.9%
7. Overall, this was an effective course.
17 11.8% 0.0%
0.0% 17.6% 41.2% 29.4% 4.65 4.90
Composite score: 4.65
D
MD
MA
A
SA
17
UU Standard Course Items
Avg S.Avg
11.8% 5.9% 11.8% 47.1% 23.5% 4.65 5.00
0.0% 11.8% 35.3% 35.3% 4.53 4.94
11.8% 0.0% 5.9%
35.3% 41.2% 4.76 5.08
52.9% 29.4% 4.76 4.89
Subject composite score: 5.00
UU Standard Instructor Items Rassoul-Agha,Firas
N SD
1. The instructor was organized.
16 6.2% 0.0% 6.2% 18.8% 43.8% 25.0% 4.69 5.07
2. The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
16 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 50.0% 43.8% 5.38 5.31
3. The instructor presented course content effectively.
16 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 18.8% 37.5% 31.2% 4.62 4.87
4. The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was
respectful.
16 6.2% 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 37.5% 50.0% 5.19 5.18
5. As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.
16 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 18.8% 25.0% 43.8% 4.75 5.11
6. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
16 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 12.5% 43.8% 31.2% 4.81 5.14
7. Overall, this was an effective instructor.
16 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 31.2% 31.2% 4.56 5.00
Composite score: 4.86
D
MD
MA
A
SA
Avg S.Avg
Subject composite score: 5.10
N = number of responses
SD = Strongly Disagree (response value 1)
D = Disagree (response value 2)
MD = Mildly Disagree (response value 3)
MA = Mildly Agree (response value 4)
A = Agree (response value 5)
SA = Strongly Agree (response value 6)
S.Avg = Subject-wide Average for this question
Get Written Comments Report
DISCLAIMER: Department composite scores are current as of the date of this report, but may be revised if
additional evaluations are processed.
1 of 1
5/28/09 10:58 AM
Download