Market and non-market policies for renewable energy diffusion: a

advertisement
Market and non-market policies for renewable energy diffusion: a
unifying framework and empirical evidence from China’s wind power sector
Authors: Yang LIU and Taoyuan WEI
Published in Energy Journal
Annex 1. Proof of Eq. 4.
Since lim Qt−h → Qt , Eq. 3 can be expressed by
β„Ž→0
𝑄
𝑑
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑑 = γ · 𝑄𝑑 (1 − Qmax
)
(A1)
as β„Ž → 0.
Notice that Eq. 2 can be rewritten as
π‘Žπ‘‘ − π‘Žπ‘‘−β„Ž = π‘Žπ‘‘−β„Ž
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑑−β„Ž
𝑄𝑑−β„Ž
which is equivalent to
π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘ 1 π‘‘π‘™π‘›π‘Žπ‘‘
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑑
=
=
𝑑𝑑 π‘Žπ‘‘
𝑑𝑑
𝑄𝑑
when β„Ž → 0. By inserting Eq. A1, the above equation becomes
π‘‘π‘™π‘›π‘Žπ‘‘
𝑑𝑑
=
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑑
𝑄𝑑
𝑄
𝑑
= γ · (1 − Qmax
)=
𝑑[γ·π‘‘]
𝑑𝑑
𝑑
γ
− Qmax
𝑑(∫0 𝑄𝑣 𝑑𝑣)
𝑑𝑑
=
𝑑[γ·π‘‘]
𝑑𝑑
γ
− Qmax
𝑑(𝑄𝑆𝑑 )
𝑑𝑑
,
𝑑
𝑄𝑆𝑑 = ∫0 𝑄𝑣 𝑑𝑣 is the cumulative capacity at time t1. Hence,
π‘Žπ‘‘ = 𝑒
𝑄𝑆
𝑑 )
γ·(𝑑− max
Q
𝑏𝑦 π‘Žπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘” π‘Ž0 = 1 and 𝑑 ≥ 0.
(A2)
By inserting Eq. A1 into Eq. 1 and rearranging terms, we have
γ
Qmax
𝑄𝑑 2 + (1 − γ)𝑄𝑑 −
1
1
1
1
+( − π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ )·π‘’ −𝑏·π‘π‘ƒπ‘‰π‘‘
π‘„π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯
π‘Žπ‘‘ 𝑄
=0
(A3)
A lagged cumulative stock 𝑄𝑆𝑑−1 at time t is used in our empirical estimation. However, due to a
continuous time framework, we cannot state t-1 in our theoretical model.
1
1
where
If 𝑄 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ is large, then
γ
1
Qmax
< π‘„π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ ≅ 0. At the earlier stage, we would expect 𝑄𝑑 is trivial
compared to Qmax 2. Hence, the squared term of 𝑄𝑑 can be ignored and the above Eq. A3 can be
simplified as
(1 − γ)𝑄𝑑 − π‘Žπ‘‘ · 𝑒 𝑏·π‘π‘ƒπ‘‰π‘‘ ≅ 0
(A4)
By inserting Eq. A2 to Eq. A4, we obtain Eq. 4.
Annex 2. Calculation of customer benefits for numerical simulation in Section 6
The customer benefits are calculated by
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 (π‘›π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘™π‘–π‘π‘¦)
𝐢𝐡𝑑 = [𝐢𝑑
− 𝐢𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 ] + ∑20
𝑛=1
π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› (π‘›π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘™π‘–π‘π‘¦)
𝐢𝑑
(1+π‘Ÿ)𝑙
π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›
−𝐢𝑑
(A5)
where 𝑙 is the average lifetime period of the wind farm; 𝐢𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 is capital costs and
πΆπ‘‘π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› is the O&M costs. With the common learning curve, we specify the investment and
O&M costs as following:
QS
𝐢𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 = 𝐢0𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 · ( QS t )−𝛽
0
πΆπ‘‘π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› = 𝐢𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 · α
where 𝐢0𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑑 and QS0 are, respectively, capital costs and cumulated installed capacity at
the starting point; 𝛽 is the learning-by-doing coefficient; α is a parameter determining average
annual O&M costs as a percentage of capital costs of a wind farm.
In the case of China’s wind power 2004-2011, the maximum Q t is only 8.5 MW (Table 1) while the
estimated Qmax is 0.45/0.00009=5000 MW for a province based on the estimated coefficients of 𝑑 and QSt in Model
A (Table 2). Hence, the squared term in Eq. A3 is estimated to be only 0.45/5000*8.5 2=0.0065 even for the
maximum Q t .
2
2
Annex 3: Evolution of different components of social welfare
Fig. A1. Environmental benefits, customer benefits and subsidy costs (γ =0.38, Unit=billion RMB)
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
-50 201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027202820292030
-100
Environmental benefits
Customer benefits
Subsidy cost
Fig. A2. Environmental benefits, customer benefits and subsidy costs (γ =0.05, Unit=billion RMB)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
Environmental benefits
Customer benefits
3
Subsidy cost
Download