ARIZONA AND NEW MEXICO
DAIRY NEWSLETTER
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
The University of Arizona
New Mexico State University
JANUARY 2006
THIS MONTH’S ARTICLE:
Rumen Acidosis,
Heat Stress and Laminitis
J.K. Shearer DVM, MSc.
Professor and Dairy Extension Veterinarian
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32610-0136
JKS@ifas.ufl.edu
(Reprinted from the 2005 Arizona Dairy Production Conference Proceedings,
October 11, 2005, Tempe, Arizona)
~~~~
Dairy Day is going back to a dairy!
The 2006 Arizona Dairy Day will be held on Thursday, April 6
at the Milky Way Dairy, 20000 N. Ralston Road, in Maricopa, Arizona.
See the flyer and golf information inside this newsletter!
~~~
University of Arizona Extension Dairy Website:
http://cals.arizona.edu/extension/dairy
New Mexico State University Extension Dairy Website:
http://nmsu.edu/~dairy
The following videos are available for checkout from the New Mexico State University. To obtain a video, call Kathy Bustos at (505)
646-3226 or email kbustos@nmsu.edu. The video will be sent in the mail pending availability. There is only one copy of each video
available, so we request that videos be returned within two weeks. Note that several of the videos contain an English and Spanish
version.
1.
The Milking School. Utah State University. Spanish and English. 1998. 30 minutes
2.
Fitting and Showing Your Dairy Animal...A Winning Experience. Department of Dairy Science, University of
Wisconsin. 1996. 20 minutes
3.
Proper Milking Procedure. University of Florida. Spanish and English. 1988. 12 minutes
4.
Milking Machine Maintenance. University of Florida. Spanish and English. 1988. 16 minutes
5.
The Basics of Vacuum and Milking Systems. DHIA Services. 1991. 53 minutes
6.
Understanding Dairy Cattle Behavior to Improve Handling and Production. Livestock Conservation Institute. 1992.
23 minutes
7.
Managing Milking/Ordenar Lecheria. Hoard’s Dairyman. Spanish and English. 1999. 33 minutes
8.
Get Milk? Joining A Dairy Crew. University of New Hampshire. 1999. 45 minutes
9.
What’s the Best Milking Routine? Dairy Management Institute. 1999. 60 minutes
English
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, James A. Christenson,
Director, Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, The University of Arizona.
The Universtiy of Arizona is an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. The University of Arizona does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status or sexual orientation in its programs and activities.
Español
Emitido en promoción del trabajo de la Extensión Cooperativa, leyes del 8 de mayo y 30 de junio de 1914, en colaboración con el Departamento de Agricultura de
los Estados Unidos, James A. Christenson, Director, Extensión Cooperativa, Facultad de Agricultura y Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Arizona.
La Universidad de Arizona es una institución de oportunidades iguales y acción afirmativa. La Universidad no discrimina, en sus programas y actividades, por
razones de raza, color, religión, sexo, nacionalidad de origen, edad, discapacidad, condición de veterano ni preferencia sexual.
Matthew J. VanBaale, Ph. D.
University of Arizona
Department of Animal Sciences
PO Box 210038, Shantz Bldg., Room 212
Tucson, AZ 85721
Phone: 520-621-1923
Email: vanbaale@ag.arizona.edu
Hilary M Sullivan, Ph. D.
New Mexico State University
Extension Animal Resources
PO Box 30003 Dept. 3AE
Las Cruces, NM 88003
Phone: 505-646-3019
Email: hilarys@nmsu.edu
Arizona Dairy Day
is going back to a dairy!
Thursday, April 6, 2006
9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Milky Way Dairy
20000 N. Ralston Road
Maricopa, Arizona
Space will be available to vendors at the following prices:
Booth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $400
Tractors, feed trucks or other equipment . . . . . . $100/piece
One table and two chairs furnished with each space
Power, water, additional table(s) and chair(s) are available if necessary
All heavy equipment will need to be delivered the afternoon of
Wednesday, April 5 by 5:00 p.m. and picked up on Friday, April 7.
Booth set-up will take place on Wednesday afternoon or Thursday morning.
Lunch provided by
For more information contact Laura Rittenbach at (520) 626-9382
or via email at ljr22@ag.arizona.edu.
®
Dairy Day
Golf
Dairy Day Golf Tournament
Registration
Friday, April 7, 2006
Club West Golf Course
16400 South 14th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ
Entry Fee:
Shotgun Start:
Contact Person:
$85.00 per person
1:00 p.m.
Laura Rittenbach
PO Box 210038, Tucson, AZ 85721
(520) 626-9382
ljr22@ag.arizona.edu
----------------------------------Registration form. Please detach and return to address above.
Individual
Team
Name(s)______________________________________________________
Organization________________________________________________
Address____________________________________________________
City/State/ZIP_______________________________________________
Phone______________________________________________________
Team Members:
Number of players
_________
___________________________ x $85.00
___________________________
Total amount due
$__________
___________________________
Please make check payable to UA Foundation
Individuals will be assigned to a team.
Dairy Day Golf Tournament
Hole Sponsorship
Sponsorship is greatly
appreciated and will be
$200 per hole.
Sponsorship includes:
Sign with your company name (If received by March 24th, 2006)
If you would like to give golf balls, towels, pencils, etc., contact
Laura Rittenbach at 520-626-9382 or ljr22@ag.arizona.edu
- - - - - - - - - - - - Return
- - - by- March
- - - 24,
- -2006
---------------
Please make check for $200.00 payable to:
UA Foundation
Laura Rittenbach
Dept. Animal Sciences
PO Box 210038
Tucson, AZ 85721-0038
Dairy Day
Golf
Organization________________________________________________
Address____________________________________________________
City/State/ZIP_______________________________________________
Contact Person_______________________________________________
Phone______________________________________________________
Article to give away_____________________________________________
Rumen Acidosis, Heat Stress and Laminitis
J.K. Shearer DVM, MSc.
Professor and Dairy Extension Veterinarian
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32610-0136
JKS@ifas.ufl.edu
Introduction
Nutrition and feeding management are primary areas of interest when attempting to reduce
lameness problems. This may or may not be the correct approach depending upon the specific
types of lameness experienced. For example, it would be hard to influence the incidence of
infectious foot diseases (foot rot, interdigital dermatitis, or digital dermatitis) by manipulation of
the diet alone. Laminitis and claw disorders share a closer relationship to metabolic disease
disorders which are often linked to nutrition and/or feeding issues. These are complicated by
heat stress which has significant effects on rumen pH due to reduced salivary buffering. In
addition, recent work by researchers from the United Kingdom suggest that peri-partum
hormonal changes may be responsible for laminitis-like lesions observed during the early postcalving period. If these observations are accurate, we have yet one more explanation for how
laminitis may occur despite proper nutrition, feeding, and heat stress management.
Rumen Acidosis
Acidosis is usually associated with the ingestion of large amounts of highly fermentable,
carbohydrate-rich feeds which result in the excessive production and accumulation of lactic acid
in the rumen. Grain overload, rumen overload, overeating disease and founder are all terms used
to describe this condition. In its acute form, the disease is characterized by severe toxemia,
ataxia, uncoordination, dehydration, ruminal stasis, weakness and recumbency. The critical pH
threshold of the rumen in cases of acute acidosis is reported to be <5.0 (as cited Nocek, 1997).
Mortality rate of the acute form of rumen acidosis is high.
The subclinical form of rumen acidosis (better known as SARA, for SubAcute Rumen Acidosis)
is more common than the acute form of this disease. It is generally observed when recently
calved cows are introduced to a diet considerably different than that fed during the dry period.
Alternatively, it may occur when lactating cows are fed diets low in effective fiber. Major
clinical manifestations would include variable feed intake, depressed fat test, poor body
condition despite sufficient energy intake, mild to moderate diarrhea, and occasional cases of
epistaxis (nose-bleed) or hemoptysis (the expectoration of blood from the mouth). Critical
threshold of the rumen pH during bouts of subclinical acidosis is reported to be <5.5 (as cited
Nocek, 1997). Conditions such as laminitis or undefined lameness, abomasal disorders, and liver
abscesses are generally secondary observations (Nocek, 1997; Nordlund, 2002).
Although few studies have been able to establish a direct link between rumen acidosis and
laminitis, most assume that the feeding program is a major underlying factor. In reality, much of
the information ascribed to cattle is based on information from studies of starch overloading
models in horses (Garner et al., 1975; Vermunt and Greenough, 1994). Recent work suggests
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 25
that an oligofructose overload model may be appropriate for the study of acute bovine laminitis.
Researchers were able to successfully create classical symptoms of rumen acidosis and laminitis
in animals treated with an alimentary oligofructose overload (Thoefner, et al., 2004). The
following is an attempt to identify some of the more important predisposing factors relative to
nutrition and feeding of dairy cattle.
Nutrition and Feeding Considerations
Rumen fermentation disorders that result in acidosis are typically traced to diets with excessive
levels of highly fermentable carbohydrates and inadequate levels of effective fiber (Nocek,
1997). Even with high quality ingredients and proper formulation of the diet, what ends up in
front of the cow is still at the mercy of those responsible for mixing, delivery, and management
of the feed bunk. Add to these selective eating or feed sorting behavior of cows (Leonardi and
Armentano, 2000) and it’s easy to see that there’s ample room for error. Equally important are
dietary changes that naturally occur during the cow’s lactation cycle. In recent years,
nutritionists have concentrated their attention on transition cow feeding programs designed to
ease the cow’s adaptation to higher energy rations necessary to sustain milk production. A
Florida study concluded that large differences in the fiber and net energy content of close-up and
early lactation diets can contribute to an increase in the incidence of rumen acidosis and
subclinical laminitis (Donovan et al., 2004).
Carbohydrate
Feeding rations high in non-structural carbohydrates to animals that are not sufficiently adapted
have the potential to result in rumen acidosis. Research shows that volatile fatty acid production
increases as pH begins to decrease when highly fermentable carbohydrates are fed. In conditions
where there is an ample supply of highly fermentable carbohydrate, rumen pH continues to
decline resulting in a change in the rumen microflora from predominantly gram-negative to
gram-positive lactic acid-producing bacteria. Eventually, the bacteria that utilize lactic acid are
outnumbered by those that produce it which leads to the accumulation of lactic acid in the
rumen. Coincident with the change in rumen pH and microflora is the release of endotoxin from
the outer cell walls of dying and disintegrating gram-negative bacteria. Aided by a damaged and
dysfunctional rumen mucosa, bacteria (Fusobacterium necrophorum), lactic acid, endotoxin and
possibly histamine are absorbed into the blood stream. These products are rapidly dispersed to
the micro-circulation of the corium, where directly or indirectly (through vaso-active mediators),
blood flow is disrupted leading to the lesions observed in laminitis (Nocek, 1997; Vermunt and
Greenough, 1994).
While there is little dispute that rumen acidosis may occur as described above, it is not clear that
laminitis will inevitably occur as a consequence. Three studies observed no correlation between
laminitis and the feeding of rations high in carbohydrate (Smit, 1986; Frankena et al.,1992;
Momcilovic, et al., 2000). Despite conflicting information in the literature, one would still have
to conclude that there seems to be an association (albeit complex) between carbohydrate
nutrition, rumen acidosis and laminitis, but more research is needed to sort out the details of
these relationships.
Protein
Feeding high levels of protein in the diet of dairy cows and the potential to cause laminitis or
lameness is surely less well understood. Outbreaks of laminitis in calves fed milk replacer and
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 26
starter rations containing 18% digestible protein are reported from Israel (Bargai et al., 1992).
Calves affected were 4 to 6 months of age and had lesions in their claws consistent with severe
acute laminitis. Although this is an interesting observation, some might view the suggestion that
high protein was the cause of this problem with significant skepticism, since milk replacers and
rations containing 18% protein (or higher) are commonly fed to calves and young stock
throughout North America without incident. Results of a Canadian study found no relationship
between the level of protein fed and lesions associated with laminitis (Greenough, et al., 1990;
Greenough, 1990). It may be that laminitis associated with protein feeding may be related to
allergic histaminic reactions to certain types of proteins, or a link between protein
supplementation and protein degradation end products (as cited Nocek, 1997). Regardless, at
this time one would have to conclude that there is simply insufficient information to know what
effects, if any, protein may have on foot health.
Heat Stress and Rumen Acidosis
The primary avenues for heat loss during periods of hot weather are sweating and panting. In
severe heat, panting progresses to open-mouth breathing characterized by a lower respiratory rate
and greater tidal volume. The result is respiratory alkalosis as a result of the increased loss of
carbon dioxide. The cow compensates by increasing urinary output of bicarbonate (HCO3).
Simultaneously, the salivary HCO3 pool for rumen buffering is decreased by the loss of saliva
from drooling in severely stressed cows. The end result is rumen acidosis because of reduced
rumen buffering and an overall reduction in total buffering capacity (Dale et al., 1954).
Rumen pH is largely determined by the balance between the acids generated from the
fermentation of feedstuffs and the bicarbonate and phosphate buffers in saliva which neutralize
these acids. Physically effective fiber stimulates chewing and chewing stimulates saliva
secretion. Consequently, consistent intake of feedstuffs with effective fiber and cud-chewing are
essential for rumen buffering. Saliva flow rates in beef and dairy cattle are estimated to be in the
range of 108 to 308 liters (28 to 81 gallons) per day (Erdman, 1988). At these rates of saliva
flow it is estimated that the cow can contribute in the range of 390 to 1115 grams (.86 to 2.5 lb)
of disodium phosphate and 1134 to 3234 grams (2.5 to 7.1 lb) of sodium bicarbonate for rumen
buffering daily. Reduced feed intake, a preference for concentrates rather than forage, a loss of
salivary buffering from increased respiratory rates and drooling, and a reduction in the total
buffering pool all contribute to a greater potential for rumen acidosis during periods of hot and
humid weather, and may explain in part, why some herds experience more acidosis and lameness
despite being fed properly formulated rations.
The effect of ambient air temperature on rumen pH was evaluated in lactating Holstein cows fed
either a high roughage or high concentrate diet in both a cool (65oF with 50% relative humidity)
and a hot (85oF with 85% relative humidity) environment. Rumen pH was lower in cows
exposed to the higher temperatures and those fed the higher concentrate diets (Mishra, et al.,
1970). These observations have been corroborated by others (Bandaranayaka and Holmes, 1976;
Niles, et al., 1998) supporting the current view that increasing the energy density of rations to
compensate for reduced dry matter intake during periods of hot weather is not without significant
risk.
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 27
Laminitis and Claw Disorders in Cattle
Laminitis is an important predisposing cause of claw disorders in cattle. Inflammation of the
corium results in the activation of tissue matrix metallo-proteinases (MMPs) that weaken the
collagen fiber bundles that make up the suspensory apparatus within the claw. Coincident with
this is the release of horn growth and necrosis factors that contribute to the inflammatory process
and accelerate claw horn growth (Mulling and Lischer, 2002). The vascular disturbances
associated with laminitis preclude the normal diffusion of nutrients and oxygen into the livingcell layers of the epidermis destined to become claw horn. This interrupts the normal
differentiation of these cells and leads to the formation of weaker or softer claw horn. Some
have suggested that “claw horn disruption” may be a better term for the condition of laminitis,
because it more accurately reflects the nature of the anatomical and physiological lesions
associated with laminitis (Logue et al., 1998). The following is a brief synopsis of the tissues
and events that occur in the pathogenesis of this disease.
Anatomical/Histological Perspectives
The corium (or dermis) within the claw capsule consists of connective tissue with a rich supply
of blood vessels and nerves. Immediately above the corium is the basement membrane and
epithelial cell layers that comprise the claw horn: germinal epithelium, stratum spinosum,
stratum lucidum, and finally, the stratum corneum or horn layer. Although it has no direct blood
supply, cells within the lower layers of the epithelium (germinal epithelium and lower layers of
the stratum spinosum) are “living cells” by virtue of nutrients and oxygen received from the
corium by diffusion across the basement membrane. Cell death and cornification (formation
cells into horn) occur as cells extend beyond the point to which they no longer receive nutrient
and oxygen supply from the corium. Clearly, any condition resulting in a disruption in the flow
of blood to the corium not only affects the corium, but also the epithelium and thus, the integrity
of claw horn.
Pathogenesis of Laminitis - The Classical Description
The pathogenesis of laminitis is believed to be associated with a disturbance in the microcirculation of blood within the corium which leads to breakdown of the dermal-epidermal
junction between the claw wall, and the bone (otherwise known as the third phalanx (P3) within
the claw. Rumen acidosis is considered to be a major predisposing cause of laminitis and
presumably mediates its destructive effects through various vasoactive substances (endotoxins,
lactate, and possibly histamine) that are released into the blood stream in coincidence with the
development of rumen acidosis. These vasoactive substances initiate a cascade of events in the
vasculature of the corium including a decrease in blood flow caused by veno-constriction,
thrombosis, ischemia, hypoxia, and arterio-venous shunting. The end result is edema,
hemorrhage, and necrosis of corium tissues leading to functional disturbances including the
activation of MMPs that degrade the collagen fiber bundles of the suspensory apparatus of the
P3. This is complicated still further by the activation of horn growth and necrosis factors that
result in structural alterations involving the basement membrane and capillary walls.
Changes occurring in the epidermis are secondary to vascular disturbances that result in reduced
diffusion of nutrients from the dermis to the living layers of the epidermis. This interrupts the
differentiation and proliferation of horn cells (also known as keratinocytes) in the germinal layer,
and the keratinization of horn cells in the stratum spinosum. The quality of claw horn is
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 28
dependent upon keratinization which gives the horn cell structural rigidity and strength. In
conditions resulting in vascular compromise such as laminitis, the keratinocyte may become
injured or inflamed from being deprived of oxygen and nutrients. The end result is the
production of poorly keratinized (weak or inferior) horn that weakens the claw horn capsule’s
resistance to mechanical, chemical, and possibly even microbial invasion (for example, an
increased susceptibility to heel erosion).
Inflammation leading to destruction of the dermal-epidermal junction also has particular
consequences for cattle in that weakening of the suspensory apparatus within the claw permits
downward displacement and rotation of the third phalanx (P3). The result is compression of the
corium and supporting tissues that lie between P3 and the sole which predisposes to the
development of sole ulcers (Lischer et al., 2002). In some cases this "P3 sinking phenomenon"
involves severe rotation of the toe portion of P3 downward toward the sole. If compression of
the corium by the toe is severe enough, a toe ulcer may develop. If, on the other hand, sinking of
the P3 is such that the rear portion sinks furthest, compression and thus sole and/or heel ulcer
development will most likely occur. Sole ulcers are common claw lesions in dairy cattle and
constitute one of the most costly of lameness conditions.
Peripartum Hormonal Effects
Recent work by researchers from the United Kingdom suggests another mechanism for
weakening of the dermal-epidermal segment between the wall and P3. Their work suggests that
weakening of the suspensory tissue may be the result of hormonal changes that normally occur
around the time of calving. Hormones, responsible for relaxation (relaxin) of the pelvic
musculature, tendons, and ligaments around the time of calving, are thought to have a similar
effect on the suspensory tissue of P3 as well. These workers further suggest that although this
weakening of the suspensory apparatus may be a natural occurrence, housing of animals on soft
surfaces during the transition period (4 weeks prior to calving through 8 weeks after calving),
may be sufficient to reduce or alleviate the potential for permanent damage to these tissues.
Researchers observed fewer claw lesions in heifers housed in straw yards during the transition
period as compared with heifers housed in cubicles (free stalls). Clearly, cow comfort issues
matter around the time of calving. It would appear that first lactation animals in particular would
benefit from softer flooring surfaces (Tarleton and Webster, 2002; Webster, 2002).
German researchers suggest that sinking and rotation of P3 may be associated with as of yet
unexplained structural alterations occurring on the surface of P3 where the suspensory tissues are
anchored. It is clear that despite the preponderance of information linking laminitis to feeding
conditions that predispose to rumen acidosis, softer flooring surfaces and cow comfort cannot be
overlooked as requirements for animals during the transition period (Mulling and Lischer, 2002).
Conclusions
Laminitis predisposes cows to claw disorders that are the major causes of lameness in dairy
cattle. It is predisposed by rumen acidosis, heat stress and peripartum hormonal changes.
Damage to the dermal-epidermal junction interferes with the diffusion of nutrients across the
basement membrane into the living layers of the epidermis. Furthermore, disruption of the
basement membrane and germinal epithelium restricts normal differentiation and proliferation of
keratinocytes destined to become claw horn. The end result is weaker less resistant claw horn.
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 29
Current information suggests that laminitis is a disease affecting tissues at the cellular level.
“Claw horn disruption” is the phrase preferred by some who believe that this more accurately
describes the lesion of laminitis. Reduced keratinization is a major complication of laminitis and
results in the production of soft weak horn that is less resistant to physical or mechanical forces.
Sinking and rotation of P3 is a secondary consequence of the damage caused by matrix
metalloproteinase enzymes released during the course of the disease. These enzymes are
responsible for degradation of the collagen fiber bundles in the suspensory apparatus of P3 which
creates laxity in this support system and permits sinking and rotation of P3. A second
mechanism is believed to be associated with the hormonal changes that occur around the time of
calving. United Kingdom researchers have proposed that the same hormones responsible for
relaxation of the pelvic musculature (relaxin) near the time of calving have a similar effect on the
suspensory apparatus of P3. These same researchers also found that housing animals on soft
surfaces throughout the transition period permitted recovery of suspensory apparatus tissues, thus
preventing permanent damage that may have predisposed to lameness in early lactation. In
problem herds it is necessary to review the nutrition and feeding program, herd management, and
cow comfort.
References
Bandaranayaka, D. D., and C. W. Holmes. 1976. Changes in the composition of milk and
rumen contents in cows exposed to a high ambient temperature with controlled feeding. Trop
Anim Hlth Prod, 8(1):38-46.
Bargai, U., I. Shamir, A. Lublin, and E. Bogin. 1992. Winter outbreaks of laminitis in dairy
calves: etiology and laboratory, radiological and pathological findings. Vet Rec, 131(18):411414.
Dale H. E., C. K. Goberdhan, and S. Brody. 1954. A comparison of the effects of starvation and
thermal thermal stress on the acid-base balance of dairy cattle. Am J Vet Res, 15(55):197-201.
Donovan, G. A., C. A. Risco, G. M. DeChant Temple, T. Q. Tran, and H. H. Van Horn. 2004.
Influence of transition diets on occurrence of subclinical laminitis in Holstein dairy cows. J.
Dairy Sci., 87(1):73-84.
Erdman, RA. 1988. Dietary buffering requirements of the lactating dairy cow: A review. J
Dairy Sci, 71:3246-3266.
Frankena, K., K. A. S. Van Keulen, and J. P. Noordhuizen. 1992. A cross-sectional study into
prevalence and risk indicators of digital haemorrhages in female dairy calves. Pre Vet Med,
14:1-12.
Garner, H. E., J. R. Coffman, A. W. Hahn, D. P. Hutcheson, and M. E. Tumbleson. 1975.
Equine laminitis of alimentary origin: An experimental model. Am J Vet Res, 36(4 Pt. 1):441444.
Greenough, P. R., J. J. Vermunt, J. J. McKinnon, F. A. Fathy, P. A. Berg, and Roger D. H.
Cohen. 1990. Laminitis-like changes in the claws of feedlot cattle. Can Vet J, 31:202-208.
Greenough, P. R. 1990. Observations on bovine laminitis. In Practice, 12:169-173.
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 30
Logue, D. N., S. A. Kempson, K. A. Leach, J. E. Offer, and R. E. McGovern. 1998. Pathology
of the white line. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants.
Lucerne, Switzerland, p.142-145.
Mishra M., F. A. Martz, R. W. Stanley, H. D. Johnson, J. R. Campbell, and E. Hilderbrand.
1970. Effect of diet and ambient temperature-humidity on ruminal pH, oxidation reduction
potential, ammonia, and lactic acid in lactating cows. J. Anim Sci., 30(6):1023-1028.
Momcilovic D., J. H. Herbein, W. D. Whittier, and C. E. Polan. 2000. Metabolic alterations
associated with an attempt to induce laminitis in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci, 83(3):518-525.
Mulling, C. K. W., and C. J. Lischer. 2002. New aspects on etiology and pathogenesis of
laminitis in cattle. Proceedings of the XXII World Buiatrics Congress (keynote lectures),
Hanover, Germany, p.236-247.
Niles, M. A., R. J. Collier, and W. J. Croom. 1998. Effects of heat stress on rumen and plasma
metabolite and plasma hormone concentrations in Holstein cows. J. Anim Sci., 50(Suppl.
1):152.
Nocek, J. E. 1997. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J Dairy Sci., 80(5):1005-1028.
Nordlund, K. 2002. Herd-based diagnosis of subacute ruminal acidosis. Proc of the 12th Int
Sym on Lameness in Ruminants, Orlando, Fl, p. 70-74.
Leonardi, C., and L. E. Armentano. 2000. Effect of particle size, quality and quantity of alfalfa
hay, and cow on selective consumption by dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci, 83(Suppl 1):272.
Lischer, C. J., P. Ossent, M. Raber, and H. Geyer. 2002. The suspensory structures and
supporting tissues of the bovine 3rd phalanx and their relevance in the development of sole ulcers
at the typical site. Vet Record, 151(23):694-698.
Smit, H., B. Verbeek, D. J. Peterse, J. Jansen, B. T. McDaniel and R. D. Politiek. 1986. The
effect of herd characteristics on claw disorders and claw measurements in Friesians. Livestock
Production Sci., 15(1):1-9.
Tarleton, J. F., and A. J. F. Webster. 2002. A biochemical and biomechanical basis for the
pathogenesis of claw horn lesions. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on
Lameness in Ruminants, Orlando, Fl, p. 395-398.
Thoefner, M. B., C. C. Pollitt, A. W. Van Eps, G. J. Milinovich, D. J. Trott, O. Wattle, and P. H.
Andersen. 2004. Acute bovine laminitis: A new induction model using alimentary oligofructose
overload. J. Dairy Sci., 87(9):2932-2940.
Vermunt J. J., and P. R. Greenough. 1994. Predisposing factors of laminitis in cattle (Review).
Br Vet J, 150(2)151-164.
Webster, J., 2002. Effect of environment and management on the development of claw and leg
diseases. Proceedings of the XXII World Buiatrics Congress (keynote lectures), Hanover,
Germany, p. 248-256.
Proceedings of the 4th Annual Arizona Dairy Production Conference Ô October 11, 2005 Ô Tempe, AZ - 31
ARIZONA - TOP 50% FOR F.C.M.b
DECEMBER 2005
OWNERS NAME
* Stotz Dairy West
* Red River Dairy
* Joharra Dairy
* Del Rio Holsteins
* Stotz Dairy East
* Mike Pylman
* Zimmerman Dairy
Paul Rovey Dairy
* Arizona Dairy Company
* Dairyland Milk Co.
Parker Dairy
* Goldman Dairy
* Withrow Dairy
* Danzeisen Dairy, Inc.
* Yettem Dairy
* Shamrock Farm
* RG Dairy, LLC
Lunts Dairy
* DC Dairy, LLC
* Saddle Mountain Dairy
Number of Cows
2,073
4,629
1,400
1,181
1,107
6,136
1,182
171
5,699
3,066
4,221
2,281
5,218
1,363
2,862
8,394
1,128
582
1,070
2,989
MILK
27,592
27,527
25,487
24,973
24,383
24,264
23,984
23,040
23,430
23,041
22,537
22,981
23,852
22,160
18,355
22,441
21,160
20,635
20,738
21,114
FAT
986
927
872
871
862
847
852
846
818
819
808
792
766
780
850
731
754
768
747
675
3.5 FCM
27,914
26,929
25,156
24,917
24,516
24,222
24,182
23,676
23,391
23,239
22,843
22,775
22,730
22,226
21,715
21,553
21,372
21,372
21,076
20,071
DO
203
185
109
170
233
175
182
152
204
144
175
177
174
169
107
156
185
128
146
152
3.5 FCM
26,589
25,791
24,687
24,610
24,343
23,801
23,729
23,710
23,677
23,650
23,220
23,075
22,208
DO
206
207
206
220
201
180
186
221
219
187
194
186
211
NEW MEXICO - TOP 50% ACTUAL MILK
DECEMBER 2005
OWNERS NAME
* Tallmon Dairy
* Pareo Dairy #1
* Providence Dairy
* New Direction Dairy 2
* Flecha Dairy
* Pareo Dairy #2
* Do-Rene
* Vaz Dairy
* Milagro
* Macatharn
* Goff Dairy 1
* SAS Dairy
* New Direction Dairy
Number of Cows
471
1,478
2764
2053
2184
3,387
2347
1,706
3389
996
4249
1,867
40
MILK
26,503
25,520
25,254
23,837
23,709
23,430
24,012
23,107
23,405
23,530
22,912
23,364
21,320
FAT
933
910
849
882
869
843
823
846
836
831
821
800
801
* all or part of lactation is 3X or 4X milking
b
average milk and fat figure may be different from monthly herd summary; figures used are last day/month
HIGH COW REPORT
DECEMBER 2005
MILK
Arizona Owner
* Dairyland Milk Company
* Stotz Dairy
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Withrow Dairy
* Stotz Dairy
* Stotz Dairy
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Stotz Dairy
Barn#
850
19925
1152
6294
8147
16824
15669
1004
6453
15679
Age
04-06
03-05
03-07
05-08
02-11
04-08
05-05
04-11
04-11
05-05
Milk
37,590
37,580
35,300
35,090
34,790
34,560
34,260
34,020
33,660
33,650
* Stotz Dairy
* Dairyland Milk Company
* Mike Pylman
* Dairyland Milk Company
* Mike Pylman
* Stotz Dairy
Parker Dairy
* Stotz Dairy
Ponderovey Jerseys
* Stotz Dairy
18753
1834
1009
1063
8259
19925
1553
18234
8269
16912
03-02
05-00
05-00
05-00
03-04
03-05
04-01
03-06
07-03
04-06
1,395
1,376
1,367
1,351
1,316
1,282
1,278
1,264
1,263
1,251
* Stotz Dairy
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
* Goldman Dairy
* Mike Pylman
* Mike Pylman
19925
1004
1373
6453
2334
1152
6294
3898
988
991
03-05
04-11
07-00
04-11
04-06
03-07
05-08
06-02
04-11
04-10
1,098
1,021
993
984
972
970
969
968
964
964
New Mexico Owner
* Providence Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Providence Dairy
Barn #
9348
7082
8147
7745
4854
4429
50
634
4733
5388
Age
05-00
06-03
05-03
05-03
05-02
06-00
04-00
04-00
05-04
04-03
Milk
40,070
37,538
37,041
36,646
36,400
36,300
36,033
35,190
35,140
35,080
544
9348
8147
843
8229
1840
9922
4852
5535
1448
07-07
05-00
05-03
05-06
06-06
10-03
07-11
03-08
05-06
06-06
1,422
1,422
1,382
1,328
1,321
1,310
1,309
1,305
1,301
1,294
9348
4429
6649
8147
3694
8807
4903
957
4733
8270
05-00
06-00
06-06
05-03
05-06
03-04
----05-06
05-04
05-10
1,235
1,137
1,090
1,089
1,085
1,085
1,077
1,075
1,074
1,073
FAT
* Pareo Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
Cross Country Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
Cross Country Dairy
Cross Country Dairy
PROTEIN
*all or part of lactation is 3X or 4X milking
* Providence Dairy
* Providence Dairy
Cross Country Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
* Milagro Dairy
Caballo Dairy
* New Direction Dairy
Cross Country Dairy
* Providence Dairy
* Pareo Dairy
ARIZONA AND NEW MEXICO HERD IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY
FOR OFFICIAL HERDS TESTED DECEMBER 2005
ARIZONA
1. Number of Herds
NEW MEXICO
40
26
2. Total Cows in Herd
77,960
49,992
3. Average Herd Size
1,901
1,923
87
86
5. Average Days in Milk
205
194
6. Average Milk – All Cows Per Day
60.1
69.3
3.5
3.6
71,177
43,231
69.5
71.2
82
72
11. Average Days Open
162
142
12. Average Calving Interval
14.1
13.9
88
82.4
14. Percent Somatic Cell – Medium
8
12.7
15. Percent Somatic Cell – High
4
4.9
16. Average Previous Days Dry
61
65
17. Percent Cows Leaving Herd
40
31
4. Percent in Milk
7. Average Percent Fat – All Cows
8. Total Cows in Milk
9. Average Daily Milk for Milking Cows
10. Average Days in Milk 1st Breeding
13. Percent Somatic Cell – Low
STATE AVERAGES
Milk
22,123
23,057
Percent butterfat
3.51
156
Percent protein
2.93
3.03
Pounds butterfat
790
812
Pounds protein
647
694
PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
TUCSON, ARIZONA
PERMIT NO. 190
Department of Animal Sciences
PO Box 210038
Tucson, AZ 85721-0038
Phone: 520-626-9382
Fax: 520-621-9435
Email: ljr22@ag.arizona.edu
UPCOMING EVENTS:
High Plains Dairy Conference
Albuquerque, New Mexico
March 16 & 17, 2006