SCF Proposal Ranking Guidelines
Attached is the sheet you will use to rank each proposal. As a reminder, here is the relevant information from
the original Call For Proposals:
The intent of these funds is to provide students access to technology-enhanced learning environments,
classroom, and/or experiential environments in the COE.
The four criteria for ranking proposals for funding are:




Evidence of clear purpose for the instructional need of students.
Evidence of impact and benefit on student learning including % affected and number affected.
Alignment with COE strategic plan and if possible department goals
Description of plan to assess the impact of the technology project on student learning
It is possible that we may decide to partially find your request. To that end, we request that you rank the items (or
group the items) in order of importance. Please be assured that the committee will contact you if they are considering
partial funding for your project.
The ranking system is as follows:
Clear/High
1. Clear Purpose
and Instructional Need
2. Impact and Benefit on
student learning
6
_____
5
Moderate
4
Clear/High
_____
6
5
_______
4
3
Excellent _____
4. Plan to assess impact of project on student
learning
3
Moderate
Excellent _____
3. Alignment with COE strategic plan
and department goals if possible
_______
3
Please turn your rankings sheet(s) to Mindy when you are done. Thanks!
3
Average
2
Average
2
Low ________
2
None
1
Low ________
2
0
None
1
0
Low__ ______ None
1
0
Low__ ______ None
1
0