Issues in Zonal Flows and Drift Wave Turbulence P.H. Diamond

advertisement
Issues in Zonal Flows and Drift
Wave Turbulence
P.H. Diamond
CMTFO and CASS, UCSD; USA
WCI Center for Fusion Theory, NFRI; Korea
ISSI Workshop, 4-9 March, 2012
1
!"
#$$
%& 2
0 !"
%"! )'(&($
#)
&$%
*+%"
,(
&!
"
)
-.
/"
3
Preamble I
planets
Tokamaks
Zonal Flows:
m=n=0
finite kr
potential fluctuations
4
Preamble II
→ Re:Plasma?
→ 2 Simple Models
a.) Hasegawa-Wakatani (collisional drift inst.)
b.) Hasegawa-Mima (DW)
c
a.) V = ẑ × ∇φ + Vpol
B
→ ms
L > λD → ∇ · J = 0 → ∇⊥ · J⊥ = −∇� J�
J⊥ =
(i)
n|e|Vpol
J� : ηJ� = −(1/c)∂t A� − ∇� φ + ∇� pe
b.)
dne /dt = 0
→
e.s.
n.b.
MHD: ∂t A� v.s. ∇� φ
DW:
∇� pe v.s. ∇� φ
∇� J �
dne
+
=0
dt
−n0 |e|
5
So H-W
ρ2s
d 2
∇ φ̂ = −D� ∇2� (φ̂ − n̂/n0 ) + ν∇2 ∇2 φ̂
dt
D� k�2 /ω
d
n − D0 ∇2 n̂ = −D� ∇2� (φ̂ − n̂/n0 )
dt
n.b.
PV = n −
ρ2s ∇2 φ
total density
2
D
k
b.)
� � /ω � 1 → n̂/n0 ∼ eφ̂/Te
d
(φ − ρ2s ∇2 φ) + v∗ ∂y φ = 0
dt
n.b.
n.b.
is key parameter
d
(PV) = 0
dt
(m, n �= 0)
→ H-M
PV = φ − ρ2s ∇2 φ + ln n0 (x)
Zonal Flows:
ρ2s
d 2
∇ φ = −µ∇2 φ + ν∇2 ∇2 φ
dt
6
An infinity of models follow:
- MHD: ideal ballooning
resistive → RBM
- HW + A�: drift - Alfven
- HW + curv. : drift - RBM
- HM + curv. + Ti: Fluid ITG
- gyro-fluids
- GK
N.B.: Most Key advances
appeared in consideration
of simplest possible models
7
6
:#H
I':#:#(!
'3-(
&!& &
6
&:#JH
:&'&5("
'*I/5!MKL(
'
!*MNL(
5 '(
&&
05
8
Heuristics of Zonal Flows a):
Simplest Possible Example: Zonally Averaged Mid-Latitude
Circulation
9
Some similarity to spinodal decomposition phenomena
→ both `negative diffusion’ phenomena
10
+'$$($(&
1 >
4&"
$
$)K))!
--% )
v∗ < 0
1 ))!)"8? )! 8
?!$$N
1 >!" 8)
11
1 7$"?!? 1 :"
$$
!)"8
$$)$"* 7O GJ;
1 '3" $$):"
"
1 $"
!
) 1 B 9
12
1 0 %" $P<
"
"
?! )>
$ 4QB
*+-+"
0 OC 1 B-#- &$" &)?$>)8?:"
0 %>)
0 G%R$C
$@
0 <
"
"*"
"
*("7<J<S
:"
!
13
1 D":),
.$
@N!--C
$
87$ )"*"
, without clear
G)C
`scale separation’
1 7!
$$"
%R 8)
>! 1 ---(&7--$T 5;<<?C$$!
)
14
1 + %R 8)%
0 $7&" 0 !
$$"
?$ 0 !&$"7! )&$)&)GC"C
? >
0 !
*U
linear and non-linear wave-fluid
element
interaction (akin NLLD)
15
#$!
1 [ + 3 1 :"
$$
&"!
$)
1 $)
0 ( "!
1 $$
7$$
1 $)*;7;
0 2++
345 $!#
1 $)
&$"7
1 )"8$
1 "?
$)
?"?GODC>!?
& )N*4&@
? @
16
1 %" $
&
0 '8 $ $)" ?D)!
1 R"
1 " 0 "
%R 1 %R)
"
?)
)
!
?$>
1 V
"!
>)!
1 %R??" OC
17
1 %'$"*%-'-&
%-'-8
( $ " # ?))
'$&
%$&
"#"
! %-'-%
&" %R 8)48
1
*
)
%R8 %-'-$
"$$$
:"
1 " :R" 8
( :"
:8
%'
:"
)8
%-'-
A
3 "
18
1 + ( *#"7> <JW;7-3-%----G;F
( )8
)
%-'-
B+IB>
+ "A ( *$
“Non-Acceleration Theorem”
1 +@,U(
.
( 0 &
)8A/$$"
?
--!"N
1 ">!NK
8$87
$
19
"!
1 #)*O7B--("7$CWW7(GJ;
?"&
0 )P
0 ? ( +( + ( ' 0 $)78 $D 7CJY
1 L)*
:$
$
0 $
$ ?$N
0 $?$"
?U--#+
V!8
*#7--GJ5AGJ5
20
"!
L+"
$"
Mechanisms
1 #
0 :
" $$))!$
0 &)
(
)
1 "U I'*4$ &
'*-.)+
'%(,&
+(
*.)+
+)(')/'
21
"!
0
++1/
1 * --A%----GJF7-3-
#$$*-#--
1 ( ( A +
) *'
)
) '
:
) *
1 +
O
' "*:%
"# ?
!$
$
+ - , $$&
B+
' Z !
+ - ,
$ ! )
22
"!
1
'):"
!N
1
')"'0 --)
2
/
0
, 01 ,
.
%7--)
$!)"
( 1
1
U-->7
$%&
')":"
!!
( +
+
&"
U--
'3%R$4 8)
*--B --5;<;
0
--)!
)!
0
,:"
!.
,!).&)?&&
0
--
$) )A+U:GJE
23
$
1 #)$)
:"
!
*@
1 $G%
%"C3
%"?!7'$(
4
+
%
?!7)*)
& #
$
+
+
/
.
! %
"
%
24
$
1 &G "C
&
&"$
$"
$$
)!
1 #
0 8
$
U
$)
U
$)
%"Z C*$7!
$")
*
)
%
Z C*+ 7)")
#) $)-
+ ( 4 *
+ ( 7 5+ 4+ ( 7 ( 7 6 ( 0 "7
0 $
+ $) $)
1 +V4 U--$$P:"
8+ $ (L( 7)"
0 +'8$)@
0 (&
, . 8
6)@.$
0 < $ $$& *7U!@. &!
0 U!
$)@
25
$
1
'" $ $ $
$"
" *-#--GJY
(
(
*
*
((
#'' & !)!&$
( ((
( 30 ( G!C
GU!C-
( ) $$-:
$)
B$
!!
26
"
#$$
%& !
!!:+%
M$+D
(
%
(%R
'8 !
$
)@
" ?D(
,&7 &"7 $&
!
.
/R
7,"L$.
27
!
"
)(
&"
('
1 (':G
VC'++)
#
1 %$$$:+%
1 @ $# @
.:+%
$:#7
)))
--)
[-\ G<<
.,&.:+%@
1 %"
0
$D 7$>)>
)
&
#
2 /
-- , ,$ +*) 00
!
$%
!"
1 .
. . . )+,',
(+',+
+(%'+
0 O"$9 :+%
?)&
28
!
1 $
0 9 "$>
>
0
0
0 :+%?7):+%? 8 # ( 1 '3 # 0 &/ &/
3 ( 1 :
;:
+ + 3 %- <
$:+%
---:" 7
D $5;<<
3 ;
+ + .-!/0 /!/0 :+%$))
29
!
*+$
(,#
&"
'('
-
#'.'
,!"
$)
1 ("! )
7--
1 M$+D65+DPM--
9 20 , , 9 20 , 1
0
, 9 20 , : ,
1 !:&" 0 , *:-D
1 %--7A( 7#2%*5;;E
-(&7$T *5;;E
30
!
%+5
6//:
(
1 (&?
?
--
&'
* 1 #
!
@
+D:&" " N@
, , 1 %R$
5
))
%R4$>)8
6
U!
, , . , , %R8 )
(" . :"
>
31
!
1 )
+
32
!
1 #% --
"
PI>!
I>!
&
:+%7L C!)--
:
1 :
] !
] &'
))N@
( :
1 "?
&!
] $
L-:-
T-#-+
U&
] !
] $
33
@D!
" $$& ! @
34
%
/
01
&"
2'
#3+
'
'
UL(
!
N
%
7%" :'-5;<;
35
%"
5
40+1
1 U"@
; , *, * * * * *
43 4* ' 3 ' *
?/5)!>(+ B@A@
, * * *
8 * 4 0 U"
4U" 4 ;4 4 +4 74 >'=
<
'+,)
36
%
1 ($
? )8$
< * 0 - , *< *# *
* 4
4 4
0 4 4 --^^
0 G$C$
&"N
4 ?$
3)!$N@
U-1
(!0 $"" !$
"*--U!
&)9
1
!7
$
) "
0 $)>)>$$@
--D!8
$
$"
& $&
>!@"N
37
1 (
0 + 3
$
&$
0 " $$& C &"$
$
G$C
>
0 &$$"$ $N
38
--C
" ?D(
1 ?D*-)GF5
&!
1 ( $)8$ B-#!"7(-'
#-D
)7
- >7B-+O
-[7
O-O " O-
7B--\7
-D&&
7-T-!&
1 ! 9
2(,C .0 *
[)
39
What is the H-mode?
What is a transport barrier?
40
shows an example close to the power or density threshold
where the discharge dithers between the L and I phases—
illustrated by the divertor tile shunt current (/ SOL flow).
Experimental motivation
[Conway ‘11 PRL]
shot
[Schmitz, TTF ‘11]
FIG. 2 (color online). (a) Tim
-3) expanded reflectometer sp
!  L-H threshold Power in low density region (typically lower than 3x1019m(b)
FIG. 1 (color online). (a) GAM existence plot in terms of Pnet
for higher intensity, with (c)
! vs I-phase
a transient
between
high confinement,
transition.
centralasline
averagephase
density.
(b) low
Edgeand
radial
electric fieldi.e.
Er L!I!H
fluctuation
level SD , and (d)
for oscillation
L (PECH in
¼prior
0:35 to
MW)
and I in
phase
(1.1 MW)
rates ‘10
andPoP],
turbulence
! profiles
Limit cycle
the transition
TJ-II[Estrada
‘10 EPL],shearing
NSTX[Zweben
¼ 0:8EAST[Xu
MA, q95
4:5, n! e ¼ 3 '
shot
24 811,
BT ¼ !2:3 T,‘11IpPRL],
L to I phase. BT ¼ !2:3 T, Ip
ASDEX
Upgrade[Conway
‘11#PRL]
19 m!3 , T # 3 keV, P
1019 m!3 , Teo # 2:4 keV, and favorable lower X point.
10
eo
ECH
!  Radial structure of mean flow shear in the I-phase limit-cycle oscillation
!  Dual shear layer in DIII-D [Schmitz, TTF ‘11]
065001-2
!  Poloidal rotation involving in the transition process in JT-60U [Kamiya
‘10 PRL]
41
42
43
44
→ EAST Results (G.S. Xu, et.al., ’11)
→ hardened, reciprocating probes
→ quasi-periodic Er oscillation (f < 4 kHz), with associated turbulence modulation
→ Er and �ṽr ṽθ �E exhibits correlated spikes prior to transition
→ support key role of zonal flow in L→H transition
Power spectra peaks at f < 4kHz
spike in Er and �ṽr ṽθ �E
45
1 %$)
F
G/0/
C< (
"D#E
( ( (+
0
0
0+
- -
45 "6
+.- 5 .-
75 "># 5 +$ 182
1 $8 $5$
P<$"$&
--$"$
&
$
$"
!5$
*.-3"># '
"># &
$
*'-O 7%--75;;_
+7
%--75;;J
+$$
$&
? $
1 :D7(
0 ) C7D
0 .
0 "># .C)C
46
#
6 ,
" /+*
" 25"
:#J! "!
'( #)" *$) &%#4 5 +
%
,)/+*)4 55 4 ,:#
'' -'
47
Slow Power Ramp Indicates L!I!H Evolution.
L-mode
Intermediate phase
Limit Cycle Oscillations
H-mode
a) turbulence
b) ZF
c) log(MF)
7
r/a
time
48
Cycle is propagating nonlinear wave in edge layer
ZF
Period of cycle increases approaching transition.
Turbulence intensity
Mean flow shear
•  Turbulence intensity peaks just prior to
transition.
•  Mean shear (i.e. profiles) also oscillates
in I-phase.
49
Mean shear location comparisons indicate
inward propagation.
50
1 9%97"4
)&
!7&
1 +! $!$
1 !$)
1 +"$
" !
&
&" $
)
COP
1 R" 77))7$ $
))9B+77+
!7+%
!9
U
&3@
51
If you build it, they will came...
Basic experiment:
- large, rotating, ∼ QG (tilted caps) liquid metal or
equivalent with Rm ∼ 100
- extend domain of PPPL experiment of H. Ji, et.al.
- aims:
- MHD dynamics of zonal flows, jets
- zonal fields, QG dynamo (L-Smith, Tobias)
- aspects of MHD momentum transport
(i.e. solar tachocline physics)
52
‘Confinement’ experiments:
(EAST?)
- high power, low τext ITB
- multi-channel DBS imaging study of qmin region, on meso-scale
-multi-channel CHS to eliminate mean flows (including poloidal)
- high space-time resolution profile evolution, i.e. corrugations?
53
1 (-($
!7
!
" "1 #
$"
) !B4
&"&
N
54
Download