Department Collegiality Correlation Coefficients by Gender
Women
Men
Satisfaction with my department as a place to work
.719 (1)
.689 (2)
Departmental colleagues “pitch in” when needed
.672 (2)
.695 (1)
Departmental colleagues are committed to diversity
and inclusion
.617 (3)
.598 (3)
How well you “fit” in your department
.614 (4)
.585 (4)
I would recommend my department to a faculty
candidate
.608 (5)
.582 (5)
Department Satisfaction Correlation Coefficients by Gender
Women
Men
Department collegiality
.763 (1)
.754 (1)
Would recommend my department to a faculty
candidate
.728 (2)
.712 (2)
Sense of “fit”
.703 (3)
.682 (3)
Would choose this institution again
.652 (4)
.655 (5)
Department leadership
.630 (5)
.659 (4)
Appreciation and recognition
.615 (6)
.641 (7)
Department quality
.610 (7)
.646 (6)
Satisfaction with the institution as a place to work
.575 (8)
.628 (8)
Table Discussion Questions
1. What are the main points?
2. What confirmed what you thought?
3. What most surprises you?
4. What are some implications for practice?
Department Collegiality Correlation Coefficients by Race
URMs
Asians
Whites
Department colleagues “pitch in” when
needed
.689 (1)
.750 (1)
.681 (2)
Satisfaction with my department as a place
to work
.687 (2)
.734 (2)
.696 (1)
Department colleagues are committed to
diversity and inclusion
.613 (3)
.679 (3)
.592 (3)
How well you “fit” in your department
.593 (4)
.646 (4)
.591 (4)
I would recommend my department to a
faculty candidate
.576 (5)
.631 (5)
.587 (5)
Asians
Whites
Department Satisfaction Correlation Coefficients by Race
URMs
Department collegiality
.790 (1)
.789 (1)
.750 (1)
Would recommend my department to
faculty candidates
.720 (2)
.730 (3)
.716 (2)
Would choose this institution again
.685 (3)
.745 (2)
.640 (4)
Department quality
.651 (4)
.672 (7)
.622 (6)
Appreciation and recognition
.629 (5)
.692 (5)
.628 (5)
Department leadership
.625 (6)
.723 (4)
.641 (3)
Institution as a place to work
.622 (7)
.686 (6)
.599 (7)
Table Discussion Questions
1. What are the main points?
2. What confirmed what you thought?
3. What most surprises you?
4. What are some implications for practice?
Collegiality Correlation Coefficients by Rank
Assistant
Associate
Full
Department as a place to work
.687 (1)
.704 (1)
.700 (1)
Department colleagues “pitch in” when
needed
.682 (2)
.673 (2)
.700 (1)
Department colleagues are committed to
diversity and inclusion
.610 (3)
.604 (3)
.601 (4)
How well you “fit” in your department
.562 (4)
.595 (4)
.608 (3)
Department Satisfaction Correlation Coefficients by Rank
Assistant
Associate
Full
Department collegiality
.769 (1)
.750 (1)
.753 (1)
Would recommend my department to a
faculty candidate
.736 (2)
.708 (2)
.711 (2)
Would choose this institution again
.699 (3)
.634 (4)
.639 (6)
Department leadership
.643 (4)
.636 (3)
.654 (3)
Appreciation and recognition
.640 (5)
.606 (6)
.640 (5)
Institution as a place to work
.612 (6)
.574 (7)
.622 (7)
Department quality
.602 (7)
.627 (5)
.645 (4)
Table Discussion Questions
1. What are the main points?
2. What confirmed what you thought?
3. What most surprises you?
4. What are some implications for practice?