A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume... 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina
advertisement
A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 010 304 308 310 320 324 326 328 340 346 348 350 351 354 357 358 360 362 364 372 374 380 384 388 390 392 394 396 400 403 406 PK K 6 PK 9 PK PK K K 9 6 PK PK K PK 9 PK K PK PK PK K 9 6 K 6 9 9 6 6 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 8 12 12 8 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 80.3 69.0 64.0 80.7 57.0 55.6 73.8 75.1 74.4 43.0 71.1 76.6 61.4 57.1 67.8 45.8 76.2 54.1 55.9 67.1 68.7 68.8 54.6 76.4 60.1 82.5 65.1 65.4 79.1 81.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm Exp NR Exp Exm Exm Exp NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exm NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst MI 01A LAKESIDE SCHOOL 000 LAKESIDE SCHOOL 5 12 No No 7.0 9 LP 01B RIVER MILL CHTR 000 RIVER MILL CHTR K 12 No No 51.2 ~ NR 020 302 304 306 308 10 K 7 K 12 6 9 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 61.6 79.2 68.7 80.8 5,9 ~ 9 ~ Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON ALEXANDER WILSON ELEM ALTAMAHAW OSSIPPEE BROADVIEW MID E M YODER ELEM EASTERN ALAMANCE HIGH EASTLAWN ELEM EDWIN M HOLT ELEM ELON COLLEGE ELEM B EVERETT JORDAN ELEM GRAHAM HIGH GRAHAM MID GROVE PARK ELEM HARVEY R NEWLIN ELEM HAW RIVER ELEM HILLCREST ELEM HUGH M CUMMINGS HIGH MARVIN B SMITH ELEM NORTH GRAHAM ELEM PLEASANT GROVE ELEM R HOMER ANDREWS ELEM SOUTH GRAHAM ELEM SOUTH MEBANE ELEM SOUTHERN HIGH SOUTHERN MID SYLVAN ELEM TURRENTINE MID WALTER M WILLIAMS HIGH WESTERN ALAMANCE HIGH WESTERN MID WOODLAWN MID ALEXANDER COUNTY ALEXANDER CENTRAL HIGH BETHLEHEM ELEM EAST JUNIOR HIGH ELLENDALE ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 1 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 020 316 320 324 328 330 332 ALEXANDER COUNTY HIDDENITE ELEM STONY POINT ELEM SUGAR LOAF ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM WEST JUNIOR HIGH WITTENBURG ELEM K K K PK 7 K 6 6 6 6 9 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 79.0 70.4 84.1 69.7 75.6 69.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ Exm Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm 030 304 308 316 320 ALLEGHANY COUNTY ALLEGHANY HIGH GLADE CREEK ELEM PINEY CREEK ELEM SPARTA ELEM 9 K K PK 12 8 8 8 No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 54.5 75.3 88.1 78.2 ~ 9 9 9 NR Exp Exm Dst Exm 040 306 308 309 311 316 324 328 330 ANSON COUNTY ANSON HIGH ANSONVILLE ELEM ANSON MID CENTRAL ELEM LILESVILLE ELEM MORVEN ELEM PEACHLAND-POLKTON WADESBORO ELEM 9 PK 7 K K PK K 4 12 6 8 3 6 6 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes 42.9 75.0 70.3 49.6 65.2 59.1 63.2 58.9 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm NR Exp NR NR NR Exm 050 304 308 310 316 330 336 348 ASHE COUNTY ASHE CENTRAL HIGH BEAVER CREEK HIGH BLUE RIDGE ELEM FLEETWOOD ELEM MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM NORTHWEST ASHE HIGH WEST JEFFERSON ELEM 7 7 PK PK PK 7 PK 12 12 6 6 6 12 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 73.2 74.4 78.0 80.6 81.3 66.1 80.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst 060 302 304 308 310 316 318 322 328 332 AVERY COUNTY AVERY COUNTY HIGH BANNER ELK ELEM BEECH MOUNTAIN ELEM CRANBERRY MID CROSSNORE ELEM AVERY COUNTY MID FREEDOM TRAIL ELEM NEWLAND ELEM RIVERSIDE ELEM 9 PK K 6 PK 6 PK PK PK 12 5 8 8 5 8 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 65.4 86.8 83.8 82.5 81.4 87.2 75.9 83.3 90.4 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc MI Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 2 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary 070 304 308 312 316 324 326 327 302 328 330 338 340 342 BEAUFORT COUNTY AURORA HIGH BATH ELEM BEAUFORT CO ELEM BELHAVEN ELEM CHOCOWINITY HIGH CHOCOWINITY PRI JOHN C TAYLOE ELEM EASTERN ELEM JOHN SMALL ELEM NORTHSIDE HIGH P S JONES MID S W SNOWDEN ELEM WASHINGTON HIGH 9 K PK 2 6 PK 2 PK 4 9 6 PK 9 12 8 5 8 12 5 3 1 5 12 8 8 12 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 41.4 81.2 75.2 73.4 60.5 74.6 80.2 080 304 310 312 320 336 348 356 360 362 BERTIE COUNTY ASKEWVILLE ELEM SOUTHWESTERN MID BERTIE HIGH C G WHITE MID JOHN P LAW ELEM AULANDER ELEM WEST BERTIE ELEM COLERAIN ELEM WINDSOR ELEM PK 6 9 6 PK PK K PK K 5 8 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No 090 304 312 316 317 318 320 324 328 330 333 352 360 364 BLADEN COUNTY B T WASHINGTON PRI BLADEN MID BLADENBORO HIGH BLADENBORO PRI BLADEN LAKES PRI CLARKTON SCH OF DISC DUBLIN ELEM EAST ARCADIA ELEM EAST BLADEN HIGH ELIZABETHTOWN PRI PLAIN VIEW PRI SPAULDING-MONROE MID TAR HEEL MIDDLE-HIGH PK 6 9 PK PK 6 PK PK 9 PK PK 6 6 5 8 12 5 5 8 8 8 12 5 5 8 12 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 100 BRUNSWICK COUNTY 302 BELVILLE ELEM 320 LINCOLN PRI 3 5 PK 2 Yes Yes Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 64.6 59.4 71.6 70.9 52.6 9 9 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ 1 ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ Exp Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm NR Exp Exp Exm Exm No No Yes No No No No No No 64.9 64.3 35.7 56.9 66.1 51.4 57.9 57.2 54.5 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exm NR Exp NR Exp NR NR No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes 52.6 64.0 49.3 74.6 65.9 77.2 75.9 67.8 39.9 53.5 67.6 69.5 53.6 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ NR NR Exm Exp NR Exm Exm Exp Exp NR Exm MI Exp Exm 62.3 ~ 1 Exp Exp No No Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 3 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 100 304 316 326 332 334 335 336 338 340 344 348 BRUNSWICK COUNTY BOLIVIA ELEM LELAND MID NORTH BRUNSWICK HIGH SHALLOTTE MID SOUTH BRUNSWICK HIGH SOUTH BRUNSWICK MID SOUTHPORT ELEM SUPPLY ELEM UNION ELEM WACCAMAW ELEM WEST BRUNSWICK HIGH K 6 9 5 9 6 PK PK PK K 9 5 8 12 8 12 8 5 5 4 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 84.5 78.8 53.3 82.3 63.2 82.4 75.0 71.5 68.9 82.6 59.2 ~ 9 9 9 9 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp NR Exp Exm Dst Exm 110 304 306 308 318 320 324 332 336 338 340 342 348 352 356 366 368 372 376 379 380 381 384 388 401 408 410 412 416 420 422 428 432 436 444 BUNCOMBE COUNTY A C REYNOLDS HIGH A C REYNOLDS MID BARNARDSVILLE ELEM BLACK MOUNTAIN ELEM BLACK MOUNTAIN PRI CANDLER ELEM CHARLES C BELL ELEM CHARLES D OWEN HIGH CHARLES D OWEN MID CLYDE A ERWIN HIGH CLYDE A ERWIN MID EMMA ELEM ENKA HIGH FAIRVIEW ELEM GLEN ARDEN ELEM HAW CREEK ELEM JOHNSTON ELEM LEICESTER ELEM NORTH BUNCOMBE ELEM NORTH BUNCOMBE HIGH N BUNCOMBE MID OAKLEY ELEM PISGAH ELEM ENKA MID SAND HILL-VENABLE ELEM AVERY'S CREEK ELEM W D WILLIAMS ELEM T C ROBERSON HIGH VALLEY SPRINGS MID WILLIAM W ESTES ELEM WEAVERVILLE ELEM WEAVERVILLE PRI WEST BUNCOMBE ELEM WOODFIN ELEM 9 6 K 4 K K K 9 6 9 6 K 9 PK K K PK K PK 9 6 K K 6 PK K PK 9 6 K 3 K K K 12 8 5 5 3 5 6 12 8 12 8 5 12 5 5 6 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 2 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 77.5 88.7 78.5 75.1 74.5 81.0 80.7 66.6 82.1 65.1 78.2 82.7 70.0 83.5 94.4 88.3 77.4 84.4 81.7 67.2 86.3 67.4 74.7 83.7 74.8 82.7 79.1 80.8 91.6 80.6 78.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm 80.6 78.4 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 4 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 111 302 304 306 312 332 348 356 360 ASHEVILLE CITY ASHEVILLE HIGH HALL FLETCHER ELEM ISAAC DICKSON ELEM CLAXTON ELEM IRA B JONES PRI WILLIAM RANDOLPH ELEM ASHEVILLE MID VANCE ELEM 9 K K K K 4 6 K 12 5 5 5 3 5 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 62.8 66.0 75.9 74.0 58.9 60.3 78.5 72.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm 11K F DELANEY NEW SCHOOL 000 F DELANEY NEW SCHOOL K 6 Yes Yes 74.6 ~ Exm 120 304 314 315 316 318 320 324 330 312 334 338 340 344 350 356 360 364 372 374 376 380 BURKE COUNTY CHESTERFIELD ELEM EAST BURKE HIGH EAST BURKE MID FOREST HILL ELEM FREEDOM HIGH GEORGE HILDEBRAN ELEM GLEN ALPINE ELEM HALLYBURTON ELEM DREXEL PRI HERITAGE MID HILDEBRAN ELEM HILLCREST ELEM ICARD ELEM LIBERTY MID MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM MULL ELEM OAK HILL ELEM RUTHERFORD COL ELEM SALEM ELEM TABLE ROCK MID VALDESE ELEM K 9 6 K 9 K PK 3 K 6 K PK K 6 PK K PK PK K 6 K 5 12 8 5 12 5 5 5 2 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 68.2 69.1 86.2 84.5 70.1 79.8 73.0 81.2 85.4 73.4 74.5 71.2 84.7 59.6 73.4 82.0 88.5 79.3 77.7 92.3 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ NR Exm MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm NR Exp Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exp NR Exm Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Exc 130 304 308 309 310 311 312 313 CABARRUS COUNTY A T ALLEN ELEM BETHEL ELEM BEVERLY HILLS ELEM CENTRAL CABARRUS HIGH COLTRANE-WEBB ELEM HARRISBURG ELEM CONCORD MID K K PK 9 PK K 6 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 90.8 78.3 85.0 71.2 70.1 90.8 79.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm Exc Exp Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Exc Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 5 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 130 314 315 322 323 324 326 327 328 329 330 336 338 340 344 CABARRUS COUNTY CONCORD HIGH J N FRIES MID MT PLEASANT ELEM MT PLEASANT MID MT PLEASANT HIGH N W CABARRUS HIGH N W CABARRUS MID ROYAL OAKS ELEM ROCKY RIVER ELEM R B MCALLISTER ELEM W R ODELL ELEM WEDDINGTON HILLS ELEM WINECOFF ELEM WOLF MEADOW ELEM 9 6 K 6 9 9 6 K K K K K PK K 12 8 5 8 12 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes 63.9 84.6 80.9 82.6 66.3 76.6 88.5 71.7 79.4 80.3 81.1 83.8 78.9 83.5 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst 132 304 308 312 328 330 332 336 KANNAPOLIS CITY A L BROWN HIGH FOREST PARK ELEM FRED L WILSON ELEM JACKSON PARK ELEM KANNAPOLIS MID SHADY BROOK ELEM WOODROW WILSON ELEM 9 K K K 6 K K 12 5 5 5 8 5 5 Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes 59.5 68.8 72.2 75.1 75.7 72.3 77.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR NR NR NR Exm Exm 140 304 308 312 316 324 332 336 340 344 348 352 356 360 368 372 376 384 386 388 390 392 396 CALDWELL COUNTY BATON ELEM COLLETTSVILLE ELEM DAVENPORT ELEM DUDLEY SHOALS ELEM GAMEWELL ELEM GAMEWELL MID GRANITE FALLS MID GRANITE FALLS ELEM HAPPY VALLEY ELEM HIGHBRITEN HIGH HUDSON ELEM HUDSON MID KINGS CREEK ELEM WILLIAM LENOIR MID LOWER CREEK ELEM OAK HILL ELEM SAWMILLS ELEM SOUTH CALDWELL HIGH VALMEAD ELEM WEST CALDWELL HIGH WEST LENOIR ELEM WHITNEL FOUR SEASONS K K K K K 6 6 K K 9 K 6 K 6 K K K 9 K 9 K PK 5 8 5 5 5 8 8 5 8 12 5 8 8 8 5 8 5 12 5 12 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 78.5 86.7 78.5 73.0 70.3 72.9 83.9 88.0 78.6 57.9 77.8 84.1 74.3 80.4 80.1 74.7 73.2 62.2 69.5 58.9 51.6 66.4 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Exm Exm NR Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 6 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 150 304 308 312 CAMDEN COUNTY CAMDEN COUNTY HIGH GRANDY PRI CAMDEN MID 9 12 PK 4 5 8 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 55.1 71.3 79.7 ~ ~ 9 Exp Exm Exm 160 304 306 308 310 311 313 316 317 318 322 324 332 344 352 CARTERET COUNTY ATLANTIC ELEM BOGUE SOUND ELEM BEAUFORT ELEM BEAUFORT MID BROAD CREEK MID EAST CARTERET HIGH HARKERS ISLAND ELEM MOREHEAD CITY ELEM MOREHEAD CITY MID MOREHEAD CITY PRI NEWPORT ELEM SMYRNA ELEM WEST CARTERET HIGH WHITE OAK ELEM PK PK PK 6 6 9 K 4 6 PK K PK 9 K 8 5 5 8 8 12 8 5 8 3 5 8 12 5 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 89.2 76.5 66.3 68.6 84.8 65.7 82.8 70.1 82.3 73.5 79.5 71.5 67.8 82.6 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm NR Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst MI Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst 16B TILLER SCHOOL 000 TILLER SCHOOL 1 6 Yes Yes 74.4 ~ Exm 170 316 334 338 339 342 344 CASWELL COUNTY BARTLETT YANCEY HIGH NORTH ELEM N L DILLARD JR HIGH OAKWOOD ELEM SOUTH ELEM STONEY CREEK ELEM 9 PK 7 PK PK K 12 6 8 6 6 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 45.9 57.3 72.7 69.8 69.4 79.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR Exm Exp Exp Exm 180 302 304 308 312 316 320 324 326 332 336 CATAWBA COUNTY HARRY M ARNDT MID BALLS CREEK ELEM BANDYS HIGH BANOAK ELEM BLACKBURN ELEM BUNKER HILL ELEM CATAWBA MID CHARLES H TUTTLE MID CLAREMONT ELEM CLYDE CAMPBELL ELEM 7 K 9 K K 9 7 7 PK K 8 6 12 6 6 12 8 8 6 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 86.5 68.3 67.9 72.7 80.0 60.9 74.0 77.1 69.0 83.6 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exp Dst Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 7 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 180 340 342 344 348 356 360 368 372 376 380 384 388 CATAWBA COUNTY FRED T FOARD HIGH JACOBS FORK MID MAIDEN ELEM MAIDEN HIGH MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM OXFORD ELEM SHERRILLS FORD ELEM ST STEPHENS ELEM ST STEPHENS HIGH STARTOWN ELEM SWEETWATER ELEM WEBB A MURRAY ELEM 9 7 K 9 K K K K 9 PK K K 12 8 6 12 6 6 6 6 12 6 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes 67.2 88.9 72.5 57.8 83.4 66.9 74.3 82.5 66.5 74.9 70.5 79.8 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst NR NR Exm Exm 181 312 316 322 326 332 336 342 344 HICKORY CITY COLLEGE PARK MID GRANDVIEW MID HICKORY HIGH W M JENKINS ELEM LONGVIEW ELEM OAKWOOD ELEM SOUTHWEST ELEM VIEWMONT ELEM 6 6 9 PK PK PK K PK 8 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 77.7 73.5 70.1 79.7 61.0 65.9 47.8 75.7 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp NR Exm 182 316 321 322 324 328 NEWTON-CONOVER NEWTON-CONOVER HIGH NEWTON-CONOVER MID SHUFORD ELEM SOUTH NEWTON ELEM THORNTON ELEM 9 6 K K K 12 8 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No 63.9 79.3 81.6 71.5 63.3 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Dst MI NR NR 18K ENGELMANN SCH OF ART 000 ENGELMANN SCH OF ART K 6 No No 40.5 * NR 190 304 308 312 316 328 332 336 340 341 342 346 K K 5 9 5 K 9 PK PK 9 K 8 8 8 12 8 8 12 8 8 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No 90.0 79.4 72.8 56.9 77.4 69.4 59.8 62.8 80.8 60.6 78.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc MI Exm Exm Exp Exm NR Exm NR Exm Dst Exm Exp CHATHAM COUNTY BENNETT ELEM BONLEE ELEM CHATHAM MID CHATHAM CENTRAL HIGH HORTON MID J S WATERS ELEM JORDAN MATTHEWS HIGH MONCURE ELEM NORTH CHATHAM ELEM NORTHWOOD HIGH PERRY W HARRISON ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 8 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 190 348 350 352 K 4 K 4 PK 8 No No Yes No No No 67.5 59.1 81.4 ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp Dst 19A CHATHAM CHTR 000 CHATHAM CHTR K 8 Yes Yes 63.0 ~ Exm 200 304 308 310 312 316 320 324 328 330 332 336 PK 9 6 PK PK PK PK 9 6 PK PK 5 12 8 12 5 8 5 12 8 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 87.2 75.8 90.5 74.7 90.7 89.8 88.0 73.0 91.3 84.1 83.8 ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exm Exc Exm Exm Exc Exm Dst MI Exm Dst Exm Exm Exc Exm Dst MI Exm Dst MI CHATHAM COUNTY PITTSBORO ELEM SILER CITY ELEM SILK HOPE ELEM CHEROKEE COUNTY ANDREWS ELEM ANDREWS HIGH ANDREWS MID HIGHWASSEE DAM UNION MARBLE ELEM MARTINS CREEK ELEM MURPHY ELEM MURPHY HIGH MURPHY MID PEACHTREE ELEM RANGER ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 20A THE LEARNING CTR 000 THE LEARNING CTR OK 8 Yes No 68.6 ~ Exp 210 304 306 312 316 EDENTON/CHOWAN CHOWAN MID D F WALKER ELEM JOHN A HOLMES HIGH WHITE OAK ELEM 6 PK 9 PK 8 5 12 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 74.0 52.8 55.6 64.6 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm NR Exm Exm 220 308 310 312 CLAY COUNTY HAYESVILLE ELEM HAYESVILLE HIGH HAYESVILLE MID PK 4 9 12 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 79.9 66.9 85.4 ~ 8 9 Exm Exm Exp Dst 230 308 312 316 320 324 328 336 340 CLEVELAND COUNTY BOILING SPRINGS ELEM BURNS HIGH BURNS MID CASAR ELEM SCH ARTS CREST SENIOR HIGH CREST MID SCH TECH ELIZABETH ELEM FALLSTON ELEM K 9 6 K 9 6 K PK Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 78.9 56.4 73.0 72.5 61.9 79.9 77.0 69.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 5 Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 9 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 230 368 370 376 CLEVELAND COUNTY TOWNSHIP THREE ELEM UNION ELEM WASHINGTON MATH/SCI PK 5 PK 5 K 5 No Yes No No No No 69.0 66.3 56.5 ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR 231 304 316 320 324 325 328 336 KINGS MOUNTAIN BETHWARE ELEM EAST ELEM GROVER ELEM KINGS MOUNTAIN HIGH KINGS MOUNTAIN MID NORTH ELEM WEST ELEM PK K PK 9 6 PK K 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 77.8 85.6 74.7 54.8 84.9 79.8 88.6 ~ ~ ~ 8 9 ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst MI Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst 232 308 310 313 316 328 332 SHELBY CITY GRAHAM ELEM JAMES LOVE ELEM JEFFERSON ELEM MARION ELEM SHELBY MID SHELBY HIGH PK PK PK PK 6 9 5 5 5 5 8 12 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No 68.0 68.8 71.5 53.6 73.1 62.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exm NR Exp Exp 240 304 308 328 330 332 334 344 348 352 354 356 370 371 372 376 380 388 COLUMBUS COUNTY ACME DELCO MID ACME DELCO ELEM CERRO GORDO ELEM CHADBOURN MID CHADBOURN ELEM EAST COLUMBUS HIGH EVERGREEN ELEM FAIR BLUFF ELEM GUIDEWAY ELEM HALLSBORO-ARTESIA HALLSBORO MID OLD DOCK ELEM SOUTH COLUMBUS HIGH TABOR CITY ELEM TABOR CITY MID WEST COLUMBUS HIGH WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP ELEM 6 PK K 5 PK 9 K PK K K 5 K 9 PK 6 9 K 8 5 8 8 4 12 8 8 8 4 8 8 12 5 8 12 8 Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 73.9 64.0 75.6 67.0 65.0 45.2 74.8 69.6 68.0 58.3 64.3 75.3 55.3 59.0 71.0 52.1 77.8 9 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 8,9 ~ 9 8,9 ~ Exp NR Exm NR NR Exm Exm NR Exm NR Exp NR Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm 241 304 308 320 316 WHITEVILLE CITY CENTRAL MID EDGEWOOD ELEM WHITEVILLE PRI WHITEVILLE HIGH 6 3 PK 9 8 5 2 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 82.1 76.9 9 ~ 1 ~ Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm 64.1 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 10 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 250 304 306 308 312 320 324 328 332 336 340 344 348 350 356 360 362 364 368 372 376 378 380 CRAVEN COUNTY ALBERT H BANGERT ELEM BEN D QUINN ELEM BRIDGETON ELEM BRINSON MEMORIAL ELEM VANCEBORO-FARM LIFE GROVER C FIELDS MID GRAHAM A BARDEN ELEM H J MACDONALD MID HAVELOCK ELEM HAVELOCK HIGH HAVELOCK MID J T BARBER ELEM JAMES W SMITH ELEM NEW BERN HIGH OAKS ROAD ELEM ROGER R BELL ELEM TRENT PARK ELEM TUCKER CREEK MID WEST CRAVEN HIGH WEST CRAVEN MID W JESSE GURGANUS ARTHUR W EDWARDS K PK K K PK 6 K 6 K 9 6 PK K 9 K K K 6 9 6 K K 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 12 8 5 5 12 5 5 5 8 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 78.7 77.4 74.9 90.9 75.8 79.2 70.4 80.9 81.5 63.7 74.3 71.2 69.2 59.7 70.2 64.0 71.1 85.3 58.1 77.9 83.4 82.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exp Exp Exp Exm Exc Exm Exp NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp NR NR Exm NR NR NR Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst 260 306 308 363 310 312 316 320 321 322 324 325 326 332 336 338 340 342 344 348 352 356 CUMBERLAND COUNTY ARMSTRONG ELEM ASHLEY ELEM GLENDALE ACRES ELEM LOYD E AUMAN ELEM BEAVER DAM ELEM LILLIAN BLACK ELEM BRENTWOOD ELEM DOUGLAS BYRD MID DOUGLAS BYRD HIGH YOUNG HOWARD ELEM CAPE FEAR HIGH ELIZ CASHWELL ELEM EASTOVER CENTRAL ELEM ANNE CHESNUTT MID CLIFFDALE ELEM COLLEGE LAKES ELEM C WAYNE COLLIER ELEM J W COON ELEM CUMBERLAND MILLS ELEM CUMBERLAND ROAD ELEM DISTRICT NO 7 ELEM K 3 K K K K K 6 9 PK 9 PK K 6 K K K PK K PK PK 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 77.5 77.6 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exp Exm Exm NR Exp Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm Dst 75.2 77.4 53.3 77.1 78.2 53.3 55.3 57.9 62.8 84.3 78.4 75.0 74.0 78.1 77.1 71.9 68.9 86.2 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 11 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary 260 358 382 386 359 361 364 365 366 367 368 370 372 380 412 383 396 397 398 400 401 402 384 404 405 444 406 408 410 411 414 415 416 418 424 425 426 427 428 430 432 440 446 448 302 450 452 454 455 456 3 K K 9 PK K 6 K K 6 K 6 2 K 6 K K K K K 1 K PK 3 PK 6 9 K 6 K K K 6 9 6 K 9 6 3 K PK 9 2 K K PK 6 9 PK Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes CUMBERLAND COUNTY LUTHER "NICK" JERALDS LUCILE SOUDERS ELEM MARGARET WILLIS PRI E E SMITH HIGH FERGUSON-EASLEY ELEM GRAY'S CREEK ELEM R MAX ABBOTT MID HOWARD L HALL ELEM BILL HEFNER ELEM HOPE MILLS MID ED V BALDWIN ELEM LEWIS CHAPEL MID LONG HILL ELEM RALEIGH ROAD KIND MAC WILLIAMS MID MARY MCARTHUR ELEM E M HONEYCUTT ELEM E E MILLER ELEM MONTCLAIR ELEM MORGANTON ROAD ELEM MANCHESTER ELEM MAE R WILLAMS KIND WILLIAM H OWEN ELEM PAULINE JONES ELEM TERESA BERRIEN ELEM PINE FOREST MID PINE FOREST HIGH PONDEROSA ELEM REID ROSS MID BENJAMIN J MARTIN ELEM ROCKFISH ELEM J W SEABROOK ELEM 71ST CLASSICAL MID SEVENTY-FIRST HIGH SOUTH VIEW MID SHERWOOD PARK ELEM SOUTH VIEW HIGH SPRING LAKE MID STEDMAN ELEM STEDMAN PRI SUNNYSIDE ELEM TERRY SANFORD HIGH VANSTORY HILLS ELEM ALMA O EASOM ELEM WARRENWOOD ELEM WESTAREA ELEM WESTOVER MID WESTOVER HIGH ALGER B WILKINS ELEM 5 2 2 12 5 5 8 5 5 8 5 8 5 1 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 8 12 5 8 5 5 5 8 12 8 5 12 8 5 2 5 12 5 1 5 5 8 12 5 No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Performance Composite 66.9 43.3 58.7 76.9 83.6 70.7 86.4 84.5 68.9 75.6 86.9 79.4 74.4 74.1 74.1 74.1 71.0 59.3 67.8 52.5 76.9 50.8 73.3 62.8 74.3 82.6 70.2 94.3 57.1 76.6 80.9 57.7 66.2 79.2 67.8 60.9 87.2 66.4 50.9 73.3 44.3 65.3 Spec. Cond. ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 12 Status Exp Exp Exp Exm Exp NR Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp NR Exp NR NR Exp NR NR NR Exm Exp NR Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exc Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm NR NR NR Exm Exm A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 260 CUMBERLAND COUNTY 459 WILLIAM T BROWN ELEM K 5 Yes No 79.6 ~ Exp 270 304 306 308 310 312 316 320 CURRITUCK COUNTY CENTRAL ELEM CURRITUCK COUNTY HIGH CURRITUCK CO MID J P KNAPP ELEM KNOTTS ISLAND ELEM MOYOCK ELEM W T GRIGGS ELEM PK 9 7 K K K K 6 12 8 6 6 6 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 73.5 63.2 80.4 78.7 78.2 77.9 80.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst 280 302 304 308 312 316 320 324 328 DARE COUNTY CAPE HATTERAS ELEM CAPE HATTERAS KITTY HAWK ELEM MANTEO ELEM MANTEO HIGH MANTEO MID FIRST FLIGHT ELEM FIRST FLIGHT MID K 6 K PK 9 6 PK 6 5 12 5 5 12 8 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 81.3 67.5 84.7 78.7 77.6 88.0 83.2 88.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Dst NR Exm Dst 290 306 308 309 312 316 320 322 324 328 332 334 336 344 348 350 352 356 364 365 366 376 380 384 388 DAVIDSON COUNTY NORTHWEST ELEM CENTRAL DAVIDSON HIGH CENTRAL DAVIDSON MID CHURCHLAND ELEM DAVIS-TOWNSEND ELEM DENTON ELEM E LAWSON BROWN MID EAST DAVIDSON HIGH FAIR GROVE ELEM HASTY ELEM LEDFORD MID LEDFORD SENIOR HIGH MIDWAY ELEM NORTH DAVIDSON SR HIGH NORTH DAVIDSON MID PILOT ELEM REEDS ELEM SILVER VALLEY ELEM SOUTH DAVIDSON HIGH SOUTHWOOD ELEM TYRO MID WALLBURG ELEM WELCOME ELEM WEST DAVIDSON HIGH K 9 6 K PK PK 6 9 PK K 6 9 K 9 6 PK K PK 6 K 6 K PK 9 5 12 8 5 5 5 8 12 5 5 8 12 5 12 8 5 5 5 12 5 8 5 5 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 87.4 58.3 78.1 69.4 70.6 72.5 75.2 63.9 72.6 79.3 88.0 67.8 84.2 72.3 85.3 79.2 79.3 80.1 63.0 75.6 78.8 84.5 76.7 58.9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 13 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 291 308 332 336 340 348 352 LEXINGTON CITY ENGLAND INTERMEDIATE LEXINGTON MID LEXINGTON SR HIGH PICKETT PRI S LEXINGTON/DEV WING SOUTHWEST ELEM 4 6 9 K PK K 5 8 12 3 3 3 No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes 65.7 67.2 54.8 80.7 67.4 80.4 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Dst 292 316 320 324 THOMASVILLE CITY LIBERTY DRIVE ELEM THOMASVILLE MID THOMASVILLE HIGH 3 6 9 5 8 12 No Yes No No Yes No 58.5 70.5 47.7 ~ 9 * NR Exm NR 300 308 312 320 324 325 326 328 330 336 DAVIE COUNTY COOLEEMEE ELEM DAVIE COUNTY HIGH MOCKSVILLE ELEM CENTRAL DAVIE ELEM NORTH DAVIE MID PINEBROOK ELEM SHADY GROVE ELEM SOUTH DAVIE MID WILLIAM R DAVIE ELEM K 9 K 4 6 K K 6 PK 5 12 3 5 8 5 5 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 70.8 67.5 77.1 78.4 87.2 80.4 87.7 76.2 76.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst NR Exm 310 304 308 324 330 336 340 344 352 356 360 364 384 388 392 396 DUPLIN COUNTY B F GRADY ELEM BEULAVILLE ELEM CHARITY MID CHINQUAPIN ELEM WARSAW ELEM E E SMITH MID EAST DUPLIN HIGH JAMES KENAN HIGH KENANSVILLE ELEM NORTH DUPLIN ELEM NORTH DUPLIN JR SR ROSE HILL-MAGNOLIA WALLACE ELEM WALLACE-ROSE HILL HIGH WARSAW MID PK PK 7 PK PK 6 9 9 PK PK 7 PK PK 9 6 8 8 8 8 5 8 12 12 5 6 12 6 6 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 74.2 82.4 68.1 82.5 57.7 76.4 59.3 42.9 84.4 83.8 71.9 72.6 81.2 58.9 65.9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm Exm Dst MI Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm NR No No 60.5 ~ NR 320 DURHAM COUNTY 304 BETHESDA ELEM K 5 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 14 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 320 306 308 310 312 313 314 315 316 318 320 323 324 325 328 331 332 338 339 340 344 346 347 348 352 354 355 356 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 372 374 388 400 6 K K 9 K 6 K 6 K PK 6 K 9 K 6 K 6 K K K 6 K K K PK 6 9 K K K K 9 7 K 9 6 K PK PK PK 8 5 5 12 5 8 5 8 5 5 11 5 12 5 12 5 8 5 5 5 8 5 3 5 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 6 5 5 5 5 No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No 70.5 60.1 37.8 65.2 81.0 57.1 78.0 77.2 65.0 45.3 72.6 76.6 39.4 67.3 34.5 68.8 82.1 48.9 76.4 62.6 65.3 42.3 77.3 72.6 69.2 66.0 62.1 68.9 72.8 53.0 70.4 61.0 67.9 50.6 45.2 68.9 74.6 50.1 27.5 52.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * 9,1 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR LP Exm Exp Dst NR Exm Exp Exm NR NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm NR LP Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm NR Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm NR Exm Exp LP NR 32A MAUREEN JOY CHTR 000 MAUREEN JOY CHTR K 3 No No 26.9 ~ LP 32B HEALTHY START 000 HEALTHY START K 3 No No 41.9 * NR DURHAM COUNTY BROGDEN MID BURTON ELEM EASTWAY ELEM C E JORDAN HIGH EASLEY ELEM CHEWNING MID ENO VALLEY ELEM G CARRINGTON MID CLUB BLVD ELEM GLENN ELEM DURHAM MAGNET CTR HILLANDALE ELEM HILLSIDE HIGH HOLT ELEM CIS ACAD FOREST VIEW ELEM JAMES E SHEPARD MID LAKEWOOD ELEM LITTLE RIVER ELEM FAYETTEVILLE ST ELEM LOWE'S GROVE MID GEORGE WATTS ELEM MANGUM ELEM MERRICK-MOORE ELEM MOREHEAD MONTESSORI NEAL MID NORTHERN HIGH OAK GROVE ELEM PARKWOOD ELEM E K POWE ELEM PEARSONTOWN ELEM RIVERSIDE HIGH SHERWOOD GITHENS MID R N HARRIS ELEM SOUTHERN HIGH ROGERS-HERR MID SOUTHWEST ELEM C C SPAULDING ELEM W G PEARSON ELEM Y E SMITH ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 15 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 330 304 308 312 324 328 330 354 332 334 336 340 348 350 358 EDGECOMBE COUNTY G W BULLUCK ELEM G W CARVER ELEM COKER-WIMBERLY ELEM C B MARTIN MID N EDGECOMBE MATH SCI PATTILLO ELEM STOCKS ELEM PHILLIPS MATH SCI PRINCEVILLE MONTESSORI ROBERSON ELEM S EDGECOMBE MID W EDGECOMBE MID SW EDGECOMBE HIGH TARBORO HIGH PK PK PK 6 9 3 PK 4 PK PK 5 4 9 9 3 4 3 8 12 5 2 8 3 5 8 8 12 12 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes 76.6 57.2 53.7 64.4 49.7 56.0 340 312 314 320 330 334 348 352 354 360 364 368 376 382 384 390 392 396 400 403 412 416 420 424 428 430 432 440 448 452 FORSYTH COUNTY ATKINS MID BOLTON ELEM BRUNSON ELEM CARVER HIGH CASH ELEM CLEMMONS ELEM COOK MID THE DOWNTOWN SCHOOL DIGGS ELEM EAST FORSYTH HIGH EASTON ELEM FOREST PARK ELEM R B GLENN HIGH GRIFFITH ELEM HALL-WOODWARD ELEM HANES MID HILL MID IBRAHAM ELEM JEFFERSON ELEM KENNEDY MID KERNERSVILLE ELEM KERNERSVILLE MID KIMBERLEY PARK ELEM KONNOAK ELEM LATHAM ELEM LEWISVILLE ELEM MEADOWLARK ELEM MINERAL SPRINGS ELEM MINERAL SPRINGS MID 6 PK K 9 K K 6 PK PK 9 PK PK 9 K K 6 6 K K 6 PK 6 K K PK K K K 6 8 5 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 12 5 5 12 5 5 8 8 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Spec. Cond. Status 54.7 60.0 53.0 69.6 73.9 59.3 57.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8,9 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 Exm Exp NR NR Exm Exp Exp NR NR NR Exm NR Exm Exm 58.0 76.3 79.2 45.9 79.6 82.6 80.9 83.1 50.0 65.0 62.8 49.0 56.1 72.2 54.5 89.4 56.7 48.4 88.7 83.5 72.3 85.2 61.3 67.7 65.4 75.5 70.7 68.5 67.9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 16 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 340 453 454 460 462 464 472 476 480 486 488 492 494 496 504 508 512 516 520 528 530 532 536 540 544 556 560 564 K 9 9 K 6 K PK 6 9 7 6 K 9 K K K 6 PK K K K K PK 6 9 K 6 5 12 12 5 8 5 5 8 12 10 8 5 12 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 87.0 69.0 64.9 45.4 84.7 71.9 63.5 82.4 50.2 28.0 73.6 74.6 68.2 70.6 74.9 82.5 75.7 59.3 87.2 73.6 73.7 84.4 75.4 76.0 75.9 85.7 75.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exm MI Exp Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp Dst Exm 34B QUALITY EDUC ACAD 000 QUALITY EDUC ACAD 6 8 Yes Yes 53.6 ~ Exm 34C DOWNTOWN MID 000 DOWNTOWN MID 6 8 No No 81.4 ~ Dst NR 34D WOODSON SCH OF CHAL 000 WOODSON SCH OF CHAL 1 9 No No 38.6 9 LP 34E EAST WINSTON PRI 000 EAST WINSTON PRI K 3 No No 3.3 ~ LP 350 304 308 310 PK 5 9 12 6 8 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 78.1 60.2 76.8 ~ 8,9 ~ Exp Exm Exm FORSYTH COUNTY MOORE ELEM MOUNT TABOR HIGH NORTH FORSYTH HIGH NORTH HILLS ELEM NORTHWEST MID OLD RICHMOND ELEM OLD TOWN ELEM PAISLEY MID PARKLAND HIGH LEAP ACAD PHILO MID PINEY GROVE ELEM REYNOLDS HIGH RURAL HALL ELEM SEDGE GARDEN ELEM SHERWOOD FOREST ELEM SOUTHEAST MID SOUTH FORK ELEM SOUTHWEST ELEM SPEAS ELEM UNION CROSS ELEM VIENNA ELEM WALKERTOWN ELEM WALKERTOWN MID WEST FORSYTH HIGH WHITAKER ELEM WILEY MID FRANKLIN COUNTY BUNN ELEM BUNN HIGH BUNN MID Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 17 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 350 312 316 318 321 330 332 336 338 340 FRANKLIN COUNTY CEDAR CREEK MID EDWARD BEST ELEM FRANKLINTON ELEM FRANKLINTON HIGH LAUREL MILL ELEM LOUISBURG ELEM LOUISBURG HIGH TERRELL LANE MID YOUNGSVILLE ELEM 6 PK PK 9 PK PK 9 6 PK 8 5 5 12 5 5 12 8 5 Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes 68.0 71.2 65.3 51.3 62.8 59.0 49.6 64.1 80.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ Exp NR Exp Exp NR NR Exm NR Exm Dst 360 308 310 320 324 332 338 336 340 344 348 352 360 364 376 380 390 400 408 426 428 430 431 432 499 436 438 440 448 456 460 464 468 470 478 480 482 484 GASTON COUNTY ARLINGTON ELEM ASHBROOK HIGH BELMONT CENTRAL ELEM BELMONT MID BESSEMER CENTRAL ELEM BESSEMER CITY PRI BESSEMER CITY HIGH BROOKSIDE ELEM CARR ELEM CATAWBA HEIGHTS ELEM CHAPEL GROVE ELEM CHERRYVILLE SR HIGH CHERRYVILLE ELEM COSTNER ELEM CRAMERTON MID EAST GASTON HIGH GARDNER PARK ELEM W P GRIER MID HOLBROOK MID HUNTER HUSS HIGH J P PAGE ELEM JOHN CHAVIS MID KISER ELEM SPRINGFIELD PRI BESSEMER CITY MID LINGERFELDT ELEM LOWELL ELEM MCADENVILLE ELEM MOUNT HOLLY MID FOREST HEIGHTS ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM NORTH BELMONT ELEM NORTH GASTON HIGH PINEWOOD ELEM PLEASANT RIDGE ELEM IDA RANKIN ELEM RHYNE ELEM K 9 K 6 3 PK 9 PK PK PK K 9 K K 6 9 K 6 6 9 PK 6 3 K 6 PK K K 6 PK PK PK 9 K PK PK PK 5 12 5 8 5 2 12 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 12 5 8 8 12 5 8 5 2 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No 52.4 63.3 85.3 80.6 63.5 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 1 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 1 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst NR NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exc Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm NR NR Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exm NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst LP 51.5 70.6 73.2 81.0 72.6 63.5 70.3 74.8 90.1 62.3 77.6 77.2 81.4 50.0 77.1 79.2 71.2 78.5 58.9 80.8 77.4 79.6 63.4 77.8 71.7 57.5 74.9 72.2 81.0 44.2 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 18 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 360 488 490 492 494 498 500 504 510 514 520 526 GASTON COUNTY ROBINSON ELEM SHERWOOD ELEM HERSHAL H BEAM ELEM SOUTH POINT HIGH SOUTHWEST MID STANLEY MID TRYON ELEM W A BESS ELEM W C FRIDAY MID WOODHILL ELEM YORK-CHESTER JR HIGH K K PK 9 6 6 K K 6 PK 6 5 5 5 12 8 8 5 5 8 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 91.6 77.2 68.0 67.8 72.7 77.5 69.3 85.8 75.8 45.1 74.3 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 Exm Exc Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm 370 304 308 312 316 324 GATES COUNTY BUCKLAND ELEM CENTRAL MID GATES COUNTY SR HIGH GATESVILLE ELEM T S COOPER ELEM PK 6 9 PK PK 5 8 12 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 71.4 75.3 52.0 70.2 74.6 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm 380 306 308 310 GRAHAM COUNTY ROBBINSVILLE ELEM ROBBINSVILLE HIGH ROBBINSVILLE MID PK 6 9 12 7 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 77.4 67.5 89.4 ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exm Dst 390 309 311 312 364 316 320 324 332 334 336 352 360 368 GRANVILLE COUNTY BUTNER-STEM MID BUTNER-STEM ELEM C G CREDLE ELEM WEST OXFORD ELEM CREEDMOOR ELEM G C HAWLEY MID J F WEBB HIGH MARY POTTER INTER NORTHERN GRANVILLE JOE TOLER-OAK HILL SOUTH GRANVILLE HIGH STOVALL-SHAW ELEM WILTON ELEM 5 PK 2 PK PK 5 9 4 7 PK 9 PK PK 8 4 3 1 4 8 12 6 8 6 12 6 4 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes 80.4 68.7 66.0 6 ~ ~ 1 ~ 9 8 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR NR Exp Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm NR Exm NR NR Exm Exm 400 308 312 332 321 GREENE COUNTY GREENE CENTRAL HIGH GREENE COUNTY MID WEST GREENE ELEM SNOW HILL PRI 9 6 3 PK 12 8 5 2 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No 53.7 59.9 65.2 9 ~ ~ 1 NR Exm Exp Exp 77.9 83.0 61.1 59.7 75.9 62.8 56.0 78.2 79.7 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 19 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary 410 304 307 310 313 316 319 322 325 328 331 334 337 340 343 346 349 355 358 361 364 367 370 373 376 382 388 391 394 397 400 403 406 409 412 415 418 421 424 427 430 436 439 442 448 451 454 K K PK 6 6 9 K 6 K K PK K K K K K 9 9 K PK 6 K PK K PK PK 6 9 3 K PK 9 PK K 6 K 6 PK K K K PK 6 6 PK K Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes GUILFORD COUNTY ALAMANCE ELEM EDWIN A ALDERMAN ALLEN JAY ELEM ALLEN JAY MID ALLEN MID T WINGATE ANDREWS HIGH ARCHER ELEM AYCOCK MID BESSEMER ELEM BLUFORD ELEM BRIGHTWOOD ELEM BROOKS GLOBAL BROWN SUMMIT ELEM CLAXTON ELEM COLFAX ELEM CEASAR CONE ELEM DUDLEY HIGH EASTERN GUILFORD HIGH ERWIN OPEN ELEM FAIRVIEW ELEM FERNDALE MID FLORENCE ELEM JULIUS I FOUST ELEM CYRUS P FRAZIER ELEM GIBSONVILLE ELEM GENERAL GREENE ELEM ALFRED J GRIFFIN MID GRIMSLEY HIGH GUILFORD MID GUILFORD PRI W M HAMPTON ELEM HIGH PT CENTRAL HIGH HUNTER ELEM IRVING PARK ELEM JACKSON MID JAMESTOWN ELEM JAMESTOWN MID JESSE WHARTON ELEM JOHNSON STREET ELEM DAVID D JONES ELEM JAMES Y JOYNER ELEM KIRKMAN PARK ELEM KISER MID LINCOLN MID JOHN VAN LINDLEY ELEM MADISON ELEM 5 5 5 8 8 12 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 12 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 12 8 2 5 12 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 5 5 No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Performance Composite 77.9 58.9 59.1 78.3 62.5 57.6 60.7 73.3 65.8 84.6 71.7 92.4 80.0 71.6 89.6 67.5 37.6 54.2 58.7 58.6 66.0 76.4 60.0 69.9 71.3 78.2 67.6 75.5 85.0 59.1 50.8 63.7 65.7 62.1 74.6 82.3 79.6 62.2 72.9 67.6 62.2 83.5 54.9 68.7 70.6 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 20 Status Exp NR NR Exm Exp Exm NR NR NR Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm NR Exp Exm Exm NR Exp NR NR Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm NR Exm Exm Dst Exm NR Exm NR Exp Exm Dst NR Exm Exp A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary 410 460 463 466 469 472 478 481 484 487 490 493 496 499 502 505 508 511 514 517 522 523 529 532 535 538 541 544 547 550 553 556 559 562 565 568 571 574 445 577 580 583 586 592 595 598 6 6 K PK K PK K 9 6 9 6 K PK K K 9 PK K K K K 9 PK K K K 9 9 6 K 9 K 9 6 K K 2 K PK PK K PK 6 9 K 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 12 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 12 12 8 5 12 5 12 8 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No 76.0 81.7 77.6 61.1 72.2 73.2 78.9 54.0 80.3 76.7 89.5 64.1 51.1 88.8 68.9 68.5 58.9 51.0 67.2 85.6 73.9 61.4 59.4 66.4 67.4 78.0 45.1 62.8 78.6 75.5 53.8 77.4 66.5 84.9 73.0 87.5 90.2 6 8 No No GUILFORD COUNTY EASTERN GUILFORD MID MENDENHALL MID MILLIS ROAD ELEM MONTLIEU AVE ELEM MOREHEAD ELEM MURPHEY TRAD ACAD NATHANAEL GREENE NORTHEAST HIGH NORTHEAST MID NORTHWEST HIGH NORTHWEST MID NORTHWOOD ELEM OAK HILL ELEM OAK RIDGE ELEM OAK VIEW ELEM PAGE HIGH PARKVIEW VILLAGE CLARA J PECK ELEM PEELER OPEN ELEM PILOT ELEM PLEASANT GARDEN ELEM LUCY RAGSDALE HIGH RANKIN ELEM SEDALIA ELEM SEDGEFIELD ELEM SHADYBROOK ELEM BEN L SMITH HIGH SOUTHEAST HIGH SOUTHEAST MID SOUTHERN ELEM SOUTHERN HIGH SOUTHWEST ELEM SOUTHWEST HIGH SOUTHWEST MID STERNBERGER ELEM STOKESDALE ELEM SUMMERFIELD ELEM LAUGHLIN PRI SUMNER ELEM UNION HILL ELEM VANDALIA ELEM WASHINGTON ELEM LAURIN WELBORN MID WESTERN HIGH C WILEY ACCEL/ENRICH 41A IMANI INSTITUTE 000 IMANI INSTITUTE Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 59.2 51.4 67.8 49.0 74.4 70.4 59.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exp NR Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exp Exm NR NR NR Exm Dst NR NR NR NR Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm NR Exm NR NR Exm Exm NR 57.5 ~ NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 21 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 420 304 308 356 312 316 320 324 328 336 340 344 346 348 358 376 HALIFAX COUNTY AURELIAN SPRINGS BAKERS ELEM SCOTLAND NECK PRI BRAWLEY MID DAWSON ELEM EASTMAN MID ENFIELD MID EVERETTS ELEM HOLLISTER ELEM INBORDEN ELEM MCIVER ELEM NORTHWEST HIGH PITTMAN ELEM SOUTHEAST HALIFAX HIGH WILLIAM R DAVIE MID PK 3 PK 6 PK 6 6 PK PK PK PK 9 PK 9 6 5 5 2 8 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 80.8 64.1 421 304 306 316 328 ROANOKE RAPIDS CITY BELMONT ELEM CHALONER MID ROANOKE RAPIDS HIGH WILLIAM L MANNING ELEM PK 6 9 PK 5 8 12 5 No Yes No Yes 422 304 314 318 324 WELDON CITY ANDREW JACKSON ELEM WELDON ELEM WELDON MID WELDON HIGH K PK 6 9 5 5 8 12 430 308 312 348 316 320 328 332 336 340 344 346 347 352 356 HARNETT COUNTY ANGIER ELEM BENHAVEN ELEM JOHNSONVILLE PRI BOONE TRAIL ELEM BUIES CREEK ELEM COATS ELEM DUNN MID ERWIN MID GENTRY PRI HARNETT PRI HARNETT CENTRAL HIGH HARNETT CENTRAL MID LAFAYETTE ELEM LILLINGTON ELEM 4 3 K K K K 6 4 PK K 9 6 K 4 5 5 2 5 5 8 8 8 3 3 12 8 5 5 Spec. Cond. Status 76.1 81.7 73.2 64.2 64.8 79.0 76.6 81.3 32.2 84.3 21.5 61.5 ~ ~ 1 9 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp NR Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst MI Exm NR No No No Yes 66.2 77.7 61.9 85.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR Exm Dst Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes 55.4 47.7 59.8 25.2 ~ * ~ 4 Exm NR NR Exm Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No 72.0 69.8 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Exm Exp NR 71.8 72.8 74.0 70.5 71.6 70.7 59.9 60.4 78.2 77.4 64.7 Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 22 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 430 368 372 376 304 378 380 384 386 HARNETT COUNTY NORTH HARNETT PRI SHAWTOWN PRI SOUTH HARNETT ELEM ANDERSON CREEK PRI TRITON HIGH WAYNE AVENUE ELEM WESTERN HARNETT HIGH WESTERN HARNETT MID K PK 3 K 9 4 9 6 3 3 5 2 12 5 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 81.6 77.5 71.7 440 314 318 320 324 328 332 348 349 350 364 368 378 390 396 HAYWOOD COUNTY BETHEL ELEM BETHEL MID CANTON MID CENTRAL ELEM CLYDE ELEM RIVERBEND ELEM HAZELWOOD ELEM JONATHAN VALLEY ELEM JUNALUSKA ELEM MEADOWBROOK ELEM NORTH CANTON ELEM PISGAH HIGH TUSCOLA HIGH WAYNESVILLE MID K 6 6 PK K K K PK K PK PK 9 9 6 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 12 8 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 450 301 302 304 306 308 316 322 324 328 332 333 334 335 336 340 341 342 346 352 HENDERSON COUNTY APPLE VALLEY MID ATKINSON ELEM BALFOUR ELEM BRUCE DRYSDALE ELEM DANA ELEM EAST HENDERSON HIGH EDNEYVILLE ELEM ETOWAH ELEM FLAT ROCK MID FLETCHER ELEM HENDERSONVILLE ELEM HENDERSONVILLE HIGH HENDERSONVILLE MID HILLANDALE ELEM MILLS RIVER ELEM NORTH HENDERSON HIGH RUGBY MID UPWARD ELEM WEST HENDERSON HIGH 6 K PK K K 9 K K 6 K K 9 6 K K 9 6 PK 9 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 12 8 5 5 12 8 5 12 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Spec. Cond. Status 59.3 64.7 58.6 72.9 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 79.5 86.7 85.2 78.2 92.3 85.2 74.8 83.6 82.2 71.4 77.3 68.2 69.0 84.5 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes 82.7 84.8 86.6 62.8 75.3 68.6 76.2 83.6 83.4 88.4 81.0 68.3 83.0 69.6 85.7 68.5 87.9 76.3 74.4 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Exm Dst Dst NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 23 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 460 308 316 318 320 328 332 HERTFORD COUNTY AHOSKIE GRADED C S BROWN ELEM HERTFORD CO MID HERTFORD COUNTY HIGH ROBERT L VANN ELEM RIVERVIEW ELEM PK PK 6 9 4 PK 3 5 8 12 5 5 No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No 54.4 62.2 57.7 29.9 56.0 49.2 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ * NR NR Exm Exp Exp NR 470 312 316 320 328 330 332 336 340 346 HOKE COUNTY HOKE COUNTY HIGH J W MCLAUCHLIN ELEM WEST HOKE MID SCURLOCK ELEM SOUTH HOKE ELEM EAST HOKE MID WEST HOKE ELEM ROCKFISH HOKE ELEM UPCHURCH ELEM 9 K 6 PK PK 6 K K K 12 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 38.4 65.0 69.5 63.9 60.7 69.9 55.4 77.1 68.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm 480 304 308 312 316 HYDE COUNTY DAVIS ELEM MATTAMUSKEET O A PEAY ELEM OCRACOKE K 7 PK K 6 12 6 12 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 58.6 52.7 57.8 79.2 ~ 9 ~ 9 Exm Exm NR Exm 490 302 376 308 312 316 324 326 350 327 328 347 332 336 340 345 344 346 348 IREDELL-STATESVILLE ALAN RUTHERFORD WAYSIDE ELEM BRAWLEY MID CELESTE HENKEL ELEM CENTRAL ELEM COOL SPRING ELEM EAST IREDELL ELEM PRESSLY ELEM EAST MID EBENEZER ELEM NORTHVIEW ELEM HARMONY ELEM LAKE NORMAN ELEM MONTICELLO ELEM N B MILLS ELEM MOUNT MOURNE ELEM NORTH IREDELL HIGH SCOTTS ELEM 3 PK 6 K K K 2 K 6 3 PK K K 3 PK PK 9 K 5 2 8 5 5 5 5 1 8 5 2 5 5 5 2 5 12 5 No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes 71.8 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exm Dst NR NR NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exp NR Dst NR Exp Exp NR Exm Exm 88.0 67.6 71.9 68.0 62.6 79.8 66.6 63.9 87.3 64.3 74.7 63.6 70.9 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 24 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 490 349 352 354 356 360 362 364 366 368 380 384 IREDELL-STATESVILLE NORTH IREDELL MID STATESVILLE MID STATESVILLE HIGH SHARON ELEM SHEPHERD ELEM SOUTH IREDELL HIGH TROUTMAN ELEM TROUTMAN MID UNION GROVE ELEM WEST IREDELL HIGH WEST IREDELL MID 6 6 9 K K 9 K 6 K 9 6 8 8 12 5 5 12 5 8 5 12 8 Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes 80.0 77.5 58.1 64.9 74.8 67.6 65.0 80.8 69.8 59.1 77.6 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm NR Exp NR NR Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm 491 308 312 316 320 MOORESVILLE CITY MOORESVILLE MID MOORESVILLE SR HIGH PARK VIEW ELEM SOUTH ELEM 6 9 PK K 8 12 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 81.6 66.9 68.8 75.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Exp Exp 49A AMERICAN RENAISSANCE 000 AMERICAN RENAISSANCE K 5 No No 62.0 ~ NR 500 304 314 316 332 337 340 K PK PK K PK 9 8 8 12 8 8 12 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 83.5 80.7 60.7 74.4 78.3 65.9 9 9 9 9 ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Exm JACKSON COUNTY CULLOWHEE VALLEY FAIRVIEW ELEM BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL SCOTTS CREEK ELEM SMOKEY MOUNTAIN ELEM SMOKY MOUNTAIN HIGH Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 50A SUMMIT CHTR 000 SUMMIT CHTR K 8 No No 80.6 ~ Dst NR 510 308 310 324 326 328 329 330 332 336 340 342 K 5 9 K K 6 K PK K K 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 80.6 81.9 71.7 76.7 88.8 85.0 80.6 71.0 83.5 82.9 85.2 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst JOHNSTON COUNTY BENSON ELEM BENSON MID CLAYTON HIGH WEST CLAYTON ELEM CLEVELAND ELEM CLEVELAND MID COOPER ELEM CORINTH HOLDERS EAST CLAYTON ELEM FOUR OAKS ELEM FOUR OAKS MID 4 8 12 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 8 Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 25 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 510 344 356 358 360 368 372 376 388 390 396 404 397 399 402 408 412 JOHNSTON COUNTY NORTH JOHNSTON MID GLENDALE-KENLY ELEM MCGEE'S CROSSROADS MEADOW ELEM NORTH JOHNSTON HIGH MICRO-PINE LEVEL PRINCETON HIGH SELMA ELEM SELMA MID SMITHFIELD ELEM SOUTH SMITHFIELD PRI SMITHFIELD MID SMITHFIELD-SELMA HIGH SOUTH JOHNSTON HIGH WILSON'S MILLS ELEM CLAYTON MID 6 K K K 9 K K PK 5 3 PK 6 9 9 K 6 8 5 5 8 12 5 12 4 8 5 2 8 12 12 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes 78.6 79.1 81.6 85.5 71.8 77.8 76.5 73.2 75.8 72.3 520 304 308 320 324 328 336 JONES COUNTY POLLOCKSVILLE ELEM COMFORT ELEM JONES SENIOR HIGH JONES MID MAYSVILLE ELEM TRENTON ELEM PK PK 9 6 PK PK 5 5 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 530 302 308 312 314 320 336 340 346 354 356 LEE COUNTY BENJAMIN T BULLOCK BROADWAY ELEM DEEP RIVER ELEM EAST LEE MID GREENWOOD ELEM LEE COUNTY SR HIGH J GLENN EDWARDS ELEM TRAMWAY ELEM J R INGRAM JR ELEM WEST LEE MID K K K 6 K 9 PK K K 6 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 8 540 304 306 308 312 314 315 316 320 LENOIR COUNTY BANKS ELEM C H BYNUM ELEM CONTENTNEA ELEM E B FRINK MID J H SAMPSON ELEM KINSTON HIGH LAGRANGE ELEM MOSS HILL ELEM K 4 K 6 4 9 K K 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 Spec. Cond. Status 85.3 57.2 64.7 81.2 89.3 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 1 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm NR Exp NR Exp Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Yes Yes Yes No Yes No 72.8 85.1 37.6 74.8 68.4 74.1 ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exp Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 70.0 63.0 70.6 77.9 61.5 63.8 63.7 73.8 75.6 83.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No 78.9 81.3 66.9 85.0 61.4 62.0 74.4 77.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 26 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 540 324 326 328 330 332 336 338 340 342 344 9 K K 6 6 9 K K K 6 12 3 5 8 8 12 3 5 3 8 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes 60.8 83.2 68.1 70.9 75.1 69.3 73.4 69.9 49.0 84.4 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ * 9 Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Exm NR NR NR Exm Dst 54A CHILDREN'S VILLAGE 000 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE K 5 Yes Yes 55.1 ~ Exm 550 312 314 316 320 322 328 332 334 336 342 356 360 364 368 372 K K PK 9 6 K 9 6 K K K K K 9 6 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 65.3 70.8 64.4 65.8 76.2 75.0 61.8 68.6 70.5 73.4 74.1 69.5 73.9 48.6 77.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 NR Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm 55A LINCOLN CHTR 000 LINCOLN CHTR K 6 No No 76.0 ~ NR 560 304 308 328 312 316 320 324 330 332 336 K 3 K K K 9 K 6 K K 5 5 2 5 5 12 12 8 12 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No 92.1 86.0 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 8,9 ~ Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst Exm NR Exp Dst LENOIR COUNTY NORTH LENOIR HIGH NORTHWEST ELEM PINK HILL ELEM ROCHELLE MID SAVANNAH MID SOUTH LENOIR HIGH SOUTHEAST ELEM SOUTHWOOD ELEM TEACHERS MEMORIAL WOODINGTON MID LINCOLN COUNTY BATTLEGROUND ELEM CATAWBA SPRINGS ELEM G E MASSEY ELEM EAST LINCOLN HIGH EAST LINCOLN MID IRON STATION ELEM LINCOLNTON HIGH LINCOLNTON MID LOVE MEMORIAL ELEM NORTH BROOK ELEM ROCK SPRINGS ELEM S RAY LOWDER ELEM UNION ELEM WEST LINCOLN HIGH WEST LINCOLN MID MACON COUNTY CARTOOGECHAYE ELEM COWEE ELEM IOTLA ELEM CULLASAJA ELEM EAST FRANKLIN ELEM FRANKLIN HIGH HIGHLANDS SCHOOL MACON COUNTY MID NANTAHALA SCHOOL OTTO ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 77.3 80.1 67.5 80.3 79.5 73.6 85.9 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 27 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 560 MACON COUNTY 340 UNION ELEM K 5 570 312 316 318 319 320 324 326 332 MADISON COUNTY HOT SPRINGS ELEM LAUREL ELEM MADISON HIGH MADISON MID MARS HILL ELEM MARSHALL ELEM MARSHALL PRI WALNUT ELEM K K 9 6 K 3 K PK 580 304 312 308 316 320 324 328 344 350 356 364 368 372 MARTIN COUNTY BEAR GRASS HIGH E J HAYES ELEM WILLIAMSTON PRI EAST END ELEM EDNA ANDREWS ELEM JAMESVILLE SCHOOL JAMESVILLE HIGH ROANOKE HIGH ROBERSONVILLE MID RODGERS ELEM WEST MARTIN ELEM WILLIAMSTON HIGH WILLIAMSTON MID 590 306 310 316 320 330 332 336 340 344 352 356 600 300 301 305 308 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status No No 79.0 ~ NR 5 5 12 8 5 5 2 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 72.9 80.6 63.3 81.0 74.3 65.4 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 1 ~ Exm Exm Dst MI Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst 7 3 PK PK K K 9 9 6 K K 9 6 12 5 2 5 8 8 12 12 8 6 8 12 8 Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No 72.3 56.8 56.3 62.2 70.5 53.4 46.0 61.3 62.1 60.1 54.1 65.8 9 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 9 ~ ~ 9 9 Exm NR NR NR Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm NR Exm NR MCDOWELL COUNTY EASTFIELD ELEM EAST MCDOWELL JR HIGH GLENWOOD ELEM MARION ELEM MCDOWELL HIGH NEBO ELEM NORTH COVE ELEM OLD FORT ELEM PLEASANT GARDENS WEST MARION ELEM WEST MCDOWELL JR K 7 K K 10 K K K K K 7 6 9 6 6 12 6 6 6 6 6 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 72.8 77.7 74.8 83.6 56.9 77.8 78.9 77.7 81.6 74.3 80.4 ~ 9 ~ ~ 5,9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm MI Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst MECKLENBURG COUNTY ALBEMARLE ROAD ALBEMARLE ROAD MID J M ALEXANDER MID ALLENBROOK ELEM K 6 6 K 5 8 12 5 No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 56.8 64.3 76.7 59.6 ~ ~ 9 ~ NR Exp Exm Exp 87.8 Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 28 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 311 314 316 319 322 326 329 331 333 335 338 341 344 346 349 351 352 353 357 358 360 361 362 363 365 368 374 377 379 381 382 384 393 394 396 398 399 405 407 410 412 414 416 420 422 424 426 427 428 K K K K K K K K 6 K K 6 K K K 6 K 6 K 6 6 9 K K K K K 9 K 6 K K K 6 9 K 6 9 6 K K K K K K K 9 K 6 MECKLENBURG COUNTY ASHLEY PARK ELEM BAIN ELEM BARRINGER ACAD BERRYHILL ELEM BEVERLY WOODS ELEM BILLINGSVILLE ELEM BRIARWOOD ELEM BRUNS AVENUE ELEM CARMEL MID CHANTILLY ELEM CLEAR CREEK ELEM COCHRANE MID COLLINSWOOD ELEM CORNELIUS ELEM COTSWOLD ELEM COULWOOD MID CROWN POINT ELEM CRESTDALE MID DAVIDSON ELEM DAVIDSON INTL BACC MARIE G DAVIS MID DAVID W BUTLER HIGH DAVID COX ROAD ELEM DERITA ELEM DEVONSHIRE ELEM DILWORTH ELEM DRUID HILLS ELEM EAST MECKLENBURG EASTOVER ELEM EASTWAY MID ELIZABETH LANE ELEM ELIZABETH TRAD/CLASS FIRST WARD ELEM FRANCIS BRADLEY MID GARINGER HIGH GREENWAY PARK ELEM ALEXANDER GRAHAM MID HARDING UNIV HIGH HAWTHORNE TRAD MID HICKORY GROVE ELEM HIDDEN VALLEY ELEM HIGHLAND ELEM HORNETS NEST ELEM HUNTERSVILLE ELEM HUNTINGTOWNE ELEM IDLEWILD ELEM INDEPENDENCE HIGH IRWIN AVE OPEN JAMES MARTIN MID 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 8 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 5 5 5 8 12 5 8 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Performance Composite 61.3 80.1 99.8 59.4 69.7 61.9 65.8 63.5 78.5 69.9 78.5 57.1 69.1 84.7 60.9 52.0 74.1 91.1 86.9 92.5 90.6 55.2 79.0 64.9 57.0 65.5 75.3 61.9 72.2 50.3 93.9 88.2 67.8 65.3 37.3 71.0 74.8 60.2 61.2 73.3 53.4 55.6 58.3 64.1 70.3 54.5 57.1 57.7 67.8 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 29 Status NR Exp Dst Exm Exc NR NR Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm Exp Dst NR NR Exm Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Exp Exp NR NR Exp Exm Exm NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm NR 95R Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp NR Exm NR NR NR NR Exm Exp NR A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 429 430 434 436 438 440 441 442 444 446 447 449 450 451 453 459 464 466 468 471 474 478 479 480 481 482 485 487 489 490 491 492 494 495 497 500 501 503 508 509 512 513 514 516 517 519 520 522 527 K K 6 K K K K K K K K K 6 K K K K 9 K K K K 6 9 6 6 K K K 9 K K K K 6 K K K 9 6 K 6 6 K K K 6 K K MECKLENBURG COUNTY JOHN MOTLEY MOREHEAD A JAMES MONTESSORI ROBERT F KENNEDY MID LAKE WYLIE ELEM LANSDOWNE ELEM LEBANON ROAD ELEM LINCOLN HEIGHTS ELEM LEGETTE BLYTHE ELEM LONG CREEK ELEM MALLARD CREEK MATTHEWS ELEM MCALPINE ELEM MCCLINTOCK MID MCKEE ROAD ELEM MERRY OAKS ELEM MONTCLAIRE ELEM MYERS PARK TRAD ELEM MYERS PARK HIGH NATHANIEL ALEXANDER NATIONS FORD ELEM NEWELL ELEM J H GUNN ELEM NORTHEAST MID NORTH MECKLENBURG NORTHRIDGE MID NORTHWEST HIGH OAKDALE ELEM OAKHURST ELEM OAKLAWN ELEM OLYMPIC HIGH OLDE PROVIDENCE ELEM PARK ROAD ELEM PAW CREEK ELEM PAWTUCKETT ELEM PIEDMONT OPEN MID PINEVILLE ELEM PINEWOOD ELEM PINEY GROVE ELEM PROVIDENCE HIGH QUAIL HOLLOW MID RAMA ROAD ELEM RANDOLPH MID RANSON MID REEDY CREEK ELEM REID PARK ELEM SEDGEFIELD ELEM SEDGEFIELD MID SELWYN ELEM SHAMROCK GARDENS 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 8 12 8 12 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 8 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Performance Composite 62.2 82.8 64.1 68.5 72.3 67.2 76.9 59.8 65.7 73.8 85.7 88.7 75.4 95.2 55.9 61.1 77.6 63.6 66.7 69.6 64.2 66.9 73.5 61.3 68.9 60.6 58.0 81.1 68.0 38.2 88.5 66.2 58.4 58.4 71.8 74.0 51.0 72.2 75.4 73.7 67.1 65.2 61.0 65.3 75.5 56.0 68.3 79.3 55.2 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 30 Status NR Exm Dst Exm NR NR NR Exm Exp NR NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exc NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exm NR Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm NR Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp NR Exm Exp NR Exm Exm Exm NR NR Exm Exp Exm NR NR Exm Exm A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 530 532 534 535 537 541 544 546 549 550 553 562 565 566 571 576 577 579 581 585 586 587 589 592 K 6 K 9 6 6 K K K K K K K K K 9 K 9 6 6 K K K 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY SHARON ELEM SMITH MID SMITHFIELD ELEM SOUTH MECKLENBURG SOUTH CHARLOTTE MID SPAUGH MID STARMOUNT ELEM STATESVILLE ROAD ELEM STEELE CREEK ELEM STERLING ELEM THOMASBORO ELEM TUCKASEEGEE ELEM UNIV PARK CREAT ARTS UNIV MEADOWS ELEM VILLA HEIGHTS ELEM WEST CHARLOTTE HIGH WESTERLY HILLS ELEM WEST MECKLENBURG HIGH J T WILLIAMS MID WILSON MID WINDING SPRINGS ELEM WINDSOR PARK ELEM WINTERFIELD ELEM ZEBULON B VANCE HIGH 5 8 5 12 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 12 8 8 5 5 5 12 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes 65.6 71.0 65.7 60.8 89.3 78.3 69.8 52.2 72.8 66.7 38.7 59.9 70.3 64.2 94.8 28.8 50.8 46.4 87.2 49.0 59.1 57.1 68.6 54.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 7 NR Exp NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp LP Exp Exm Exp Exp Exc Exp NR Exm Exp Dst Exm NR NR NR Exm 60A COMMUNITY CHTR 000 COMMUNITY CHTR OK 5 No No 40.5 * NR 60D LAKE NORMAN CHTR 000 LAKE NORMAN CHTR 5 8 Yes Yes 87.0 ~ Exm Dst 610 302 308 310 320 326 334 336 MITCHELL COUNTY BOWMAN MID BULADEAN ELEM DEYTON PRI GOUGE ELEM HARRIS MID MITCHELL HIGH TIPTON HILL ELEM 5 K K PK 4 9 K 8 8 3 4 8 12 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 73.9 58.3 88.9 69.9 82.1 60.9 85.4 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 8 ~ Exm NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst 620 312 314 316 324 MONTGOMERY COUNTY CANDOR ELEM EAST MIDD EAST MONTGOMERY HIGH MOUNT GILEAD ELEM K 6 9 K 5 8 12 5 No Yes Yes No No No Yes No 65.1 65.9 43.6 61.2 ~ 9 8 ~ NR Exp Exm NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 31 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 620 334 336 339 340 MONTGOMERY COUNTY STAR-BISCOE ELEM TROY ELEM WEST MID WEST MONTGOMERY HIGH K K 6 9 5 5 8 12 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes 65.9 66.2 75.5 46.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exm 630 304 308 312 316 320 324 328 331 332 336 340 342 348 352 356 360 364 368 374 376 MOORE COUNTY ABERDEEN ELEM ABERDEEN MID CAMERON ELEM CARTHAGE ELEM ELISE MID SANDHILLS-FARM LIFE HIGHFALLS ELEM NEW CENTURY MID NORTH MOORE HIGH PINECREST HIGH ACADEMY HEIGHTS YR RND PINEHURST ELEM ROBBINS ELEM SOUTHERN PINES ELEM SOUTHERN PINES MID UNION PINES HIGH VASS-LAKEVIEW ELEM WEST END ELEM WEST PINE MID WESTMOORE ELEM PK 4 K K 5 K K 6 9 9 K K PK K 4 9 PK K 6 K 3 8 5 5 8 5 8 8 12 12 5 5 4 3 8 12 5 5 8 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No 69.1 74.5 74.3 72.7 73.8 86.8 81.9 76.9 54.1 63.3 80.6 78.3 67.8 76.2 69.2 60.1 75.3 78.3 89.4 74.9 ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp 63A MAST 000 MAST 5 8 Yes Yes 76.3 ~ Exm 640 304 306 308 316 320 324 326 327 328 329 331 332 334 336 348 PK PK PK PK 8 PK PK PK PK 8 PK PK 6 PK PK 6 5 5 5 9 6 5 2 5 9 5 5 7 6 5 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 67.6 62.1 80.9 68.1 77.8 77.8 72.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 1 ~ 9 * ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exp Dst Exp NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BAILEY ELEM BASKERVILLE ELEM BENVENUE ELEM CEDAR GROVE ELEM NASH CENTRAL JR HIGH COOPERS ELEM D S JOHNSON ELEM FAIRVIEW CHILDHD CTR ENGLEWOOD ELEM G R EDWARDS JR HIGH JAMES C BRASWELL M B HUBBARD ELEM J W PARKER MID MIDDLESEX ELEM NASHVILLE ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 88.3 75.1 48.4 80.6 69.5 63.1 85.3 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 32 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 640 350 354 358 360 361 362 364 376 384 396 400 10 PK 6 PK 10 7 10 PK PK PK PK 12 5 7 5 12 9 12 6 5 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 55.7 55.2 75.4 81.6 52.8 74.5 52.9 70.4 53.9 65.2 72.5 4,9 ~ ~ ~ 4,9 9 4,9 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Exm 64A ROCKY MOUNT CHTR 000 ROCKY MOUNT CHTR K 5 No No 52.5 ~ NR 650 304 308 312 316 320 324 325 326 328 332 338 339 340 341 342 346 350 351 352 353 356 360 362 364 366 368 384 392 400 404 408 K K PK PK 6 K 6 9 K OK OK PK OK K 9 PK 6 6 9 K K PK PK 6 K PK K 6 K K K 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 8 12 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No 71.0 69.6 59.0 73.8 73.9 85.8 81.9 67.8 78.4 77.6 74.7 88.1 63.7 80.9 76.4 72.5 82.4 88.0 59.4 93.1 82.6 88.3 78.5 90.6 79.2 62.0 66.3 73.3 81.7 68.9 90.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp Exp NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst Exm NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exc Exp Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Exp NR Exm Exp Dst NR Dst NR NASH-ROCKY MOUNT NORTHERN NASH HIGH O R POPE ELEM RED OAK MID RED OAK ELEM ROCKY MOUNT HIGH SOUTHERN NASH JR HIGH SOUTHERN NASH SR HIGH SPRING HOPE ELEM SWIFT CREEK ELEM WILLIFORD ELEM WINSTEAD AVENUE ELEM NEW HANOVER COUNTY BRADLEY CREEK ELEM CAROLINA BEACH ELEM ANNIE H SNIPES ELEM COLLEGE PARK ELEM D C VIRGO MID EDWIN A ALDERMAN ELEM EMMA B TRASK MID EMSLEY A LANEY HIGH FOREST HILLS ELEM GREGORY ELEM HEYWARD C BELLAMY HOLLY TREE ELEM J C ROE ELEM JOHN J BLAIR ELEM JOHN T HOGGARD HIGH MARY C WILLIAMS ELEM M C S NOBLE MID MYRTLE GROVE MID NEW HANOVER HIGH DR HUBERT EATON ELEM OGDEN ELEM DOROTHY B JOHNSON PINE VALLEY ELEM ROLAND-GRISE MID DR JOHN CODINGTON ELEM SUNSET PARK ELEM WILLIAM H BLOUNT ELEM WILLISTON MID WINTER PARK MODEL ELEM WRIGHTSBORO ELEM WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 33 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 660 304 308 312 316 320 324 336 356 360 364 NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SEABOARD-COATES ELEM CONWAY MID JACKSON-EASTSIDE ELEM GARYSBURG ELEM GASTON JUNIOR HIGH NORTHAMPTON HIGH-WEST NORTHAMPTON HIGH-EAST SQUIRE ELEM WILLIS HARE ELEM RICH SQUARE-CREECY PK 6 PK PK 6 9 9 PK PK PK 5 8 5 5 8 12 12 5 5 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No 68.7 71.1 65.1 75.1 81.6 37.9 45.1 57.4 74.3 59.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm NR NR NR 670 304 308 312 314 318 320 321 322 323 324 325 330 331 332 335 336 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 350 351 352 356 360 364 ONSLOW COUNTY BELL FORK ELEM BLUE CREEK ELEM CLYDE ERWIN ELEM DIXON ELEM DIXON MID DIXON HIGH HUNTERS CREEK ELEM HUNTERS CREEK MID JACKSONVILLE COM ELEM JACKSONVILLE HIGH JACKSONVILLE COM MID MORTON ELEM NEW BRIDGE MID NORTHWOODS ELEM QUEENS CREEK ELEM NORTHWOODS PARK MID PARKWOOD ELEM RICHLANDS ELEM RICHLANDS HIGH SAND RIDGE ELEM SILVERDALE ELEM SOUTHWEST ELEM SOUTHWEST HIGH SOUTHWEST MID SUMMERSILL ELEM SWANSBORO ELEM SWANSBORO MID SWANSBORO HIGH TREXLER MID WALTER THOMPSON ELEM WHITE OAK HIGH PK PK PK PK 6 9 PK 6 PK 9 6 PK 6 PK K 6 PK PK 9 K PK PK 9 6 PK PK 6 9 6 PK 9 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 8 5 12 8 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 12 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 8 12 8 5 12 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 87.3 73.2 57.9 80.3 73.6 68.6 81.5 78.2 79.2 63.5 77.9 80.5 86.5 82.6 68.0 77.0 81.2 73.9 65.7 74.1 77.7 82.6 69.3 81.2 73.3 82.4 73.5 68.2 72.5 67.7 64.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 34 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 67A PHASE ACADEMY 000 PHASE ACADEMY K 8 No No 49.3 * NR 680 304 308 312 316 324 328 329 330 332 ORANGE COUNTY A L STANBACK MID CAMERON PARK ELEM CENTRAL ELEM CHARLES STANFORD MID EFLAND CHEEKS ELEM GRADY BROWN ELEM HILLSBOROUGH ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM ORANGE SENIOR HIGH 6 K K 6 K K K K 9 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes 82.9 82.2 78.0 74.5 72.5 79.5 71.4 73.1 65.6 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm 681 304 308 309 310 311 312 314 316 320 322 324 326 CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CARRBORO ELEM CHAPEL HILL HIGH C & L MCDOUGLE MID ELIZABETH SEAWELL EPHESUS ROAD ELEM ESTES HILLS ELEM EAST CHAPEL HILL HIGH FRANK P GRAHAM ELEM GLENWOOD ELEM GREY CULBRETH MID GUY PHILLIPS MID C&L MCDOUGLE ELEM K 9 6 PK K K 9 K PK 6 6 PK 5 12 8 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 77.1 82.6 92.9 87.6 87.0 90.5 85.8 87.4 86.9 89.2 89.6 86.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Status 68A ORANGE CHTR 000 ORANGE CHTR OK 8 Yes Yes 78.6 ~ Exm 68K VILLAGE CHTR 000 VILLAGE CHTR K 8 Yes Yes 74.1 ~ Exm 690 312 324 316 320 3 PK 6 9 5 2 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 77.5 ~ 1 9 ~ Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm PAMLICO COUNTY FRED A ANDERSON ELEM PAMLICO CO PRI PAMLICO CO MID PAMLICO COUNTY HIGH 86.3 57.0 Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 35 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 69A ARAPAHOE CHTR 000 ARAPAHOE CHTR K 8 Yes Yes 88.5 ~ Exm Dst 700 306 308 314 316 317 318 320 322 324 328 PASQUOTANK COUNTY CENTRAL ELEM ELIZABETH CITY MID NORTHSIDE ELEM J C SAWYER ELEM NORTHEASTERN HIGH PASQUOTANK ELEM P W MOORE ELEM RIVER ROAD MID SHEEP-HARNEY ELEM WEEKSVILLE ELEM K 6 K PK 9 PK PK 6 PK K 5 8 5 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes 74.6 71.3 69.0 61.6 45.2 61.0 58.5 75.4 57.1 75.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exp NR Exp NR Exm Exp NR Exm 710 312 316 323 324 326 328 332 342 346 347 348 PENDER COUNTY BURGAW ELEM BURGAW MID NORTH TOPSAIL ELEM MALPASS CORNER ELEM PENDER HIGH PENDERLEA ELEM ROCKY POINT ELEM TOPSAIL HIGH TOPSAIL MID SOUTH TOPSAIL ELEM WEST PENDER MID PK 6 K PK 9 K PK 9 6 K 6 5 8 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 8 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 68.5 81.6 79.9 66.5 57.4 86.6 72.2 74.5 86.3 88.9 73.4 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Exm Dst MI Exm Exm MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm 720 312 304 316 320 PERQUIMANS COUNTY HERTFORD GRAMMAR PERQUIMANS CENTRAL PERQUIMANS CO HIGH PERQUIMANS CO MID 3 PK 9 6 5 2 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 64.4 57.9 74.9 ~ 1 9 9 Exm Exm Exm Exm 730 308 324 332 334 340 344 348 352 PERSON COUNTY BETHEL HILL ELEM EARL BRADSHER ELEM HELENA ELEM NORTH ELEM NORTH END ELEM NORTHERN MID OAK LANE ELEM PERSON HIGH K PK K PK K 6 K 9 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 76.7 82.5 77.1 58.1 74.8 82.9 88.8 56.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8,9 Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 36 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 730 356 360 368 PERSON COUNTY SOUTH ELEM SOUTHERN MID WOODLAND ELEM PK 5 6 8 K 5 740 302 304 308 309 310 320 324 332 333 334 336 337 338 340 344 352 358 360 366 374 376 380 382 386 390 396 400 402 404 406 PITT COUNTY A G COX MID AYDEN ELEM AYDEN MID AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH BELVOIR ELEM BETHEL ELEM C M EPPES MID CHICOD ELEM D H CONLEY HIGH FALKLAND ELEM EASTERN ELEM E B AYCOCK MID ELMHURST ELEM FARMVILLE MID FARMVILLE CENTRAL GRIFTON ELEM G R WHITFIELD ELEM H B SUGG ELEM J H ROSE HIGH NORTH PITT HIGH PACTOLUS ELEM W H ROBINSON ELEM SADIE SAULTER ELEM SAM D BUNDY ELEM S GREENVILLE ELEM STOKES ELEM WAHL COATES ELEM WELLCOME MID WINTERGREEN INTER WINTERGREEN PRI 6 K 5 9 PK PK 6 K 9 PK K 6 K 6 9 K K K 9 9 K K K 1 K PK K 6 3 K 74A RIGHT STEP ACAD 000 RIGHT STEP ACAD 750 304 306 314 318 320 328 POLK COUNTY TRYON ELEM TRYON MID POLK CENTRAL POLK COUNTY HIGH SALUDA ELEM SUNNY VIEW ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 65.1 75.4 81.2 ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Dst 8 4 8 12 5 8 8 8 12 5 5 8 5 8 12 8 8 5 12 12 5 5 5 3 5 8 5 8 6 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No 80.6 61.4 75.1 52.3 64.9 71.2 70.2 75.4 62.6 62.3 81.8 80.2 77.5 75.3 55.6 76.3 66.9 63.0 71.7 46.5 52.9 73.4 56.8 65.9 65.6 77.1 77.2 68.0 71.7 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 1 Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm NR Exm Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exp Exp NR Exp NR Exm Exm NR Exm NR NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp 6 12 No No 13.9 9 LP PK 6 PK 9 PK K 5 8 8 12 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 90.8 91.3 77.2 63.6 84.1 71.7 ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 37 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 760 304 308 316 318 320 324 328 330 331 332 336 340 344 348 352 356 357 358 360 364 368 376 378 380 RANDOLPH COUNTY ARCHDALE ELEM BRAXTON CRAVEN COLERIDGE ELEM EASTERN RANDOLPH HIGH FARMER ELEM FRANKLINVILLE ELEM GRAYS CHAPEL ELEM JOHN R LAWRENCE ELEM LEVEL CROSS ELEM LIBERTY ELEM NEW MARKET ELEM RAMSEUR ELEM RANDLEMAN ELEM RANDLEMAN HIGH RANDLEMAN MID SEAGROVE ELEM S E RANDOLPH MID SOUTHWESTERN HIGH S W RANDOLPH MID TABERNACLE ELEM TRINDALE ELEM TRINITY ELEM ARCHDALE-TRINITY MID TRINITY HIGH K 6 K 9 K K K PK K K K PK K 9 6 K 6 9 6 K K K 7 9 5 6 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 8 12 8 5 5 5 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes 80.1 86.4 76.4 56.8 85.5 78.5 79.7 86.4 66.7 71.0 67.4 74.1 72.8 55.6 69.7 71.1 79.5 68.7 76.5 71.6 75.5 67.2 80.0 65.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exp NR Exm Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm 761 304 308 312 320 321 328 332 336 ASHEBORO CITY ASHEBORO HIGH SOUTH ASHEBORO MID BALFOUR ELEM CHARLES MCCRARY ELEM DONNA L LOFLIN ELEM GUY B TEACHEY ELEM LINDLEY PARK ELEM NORTH ASHEBORO MID 9 6 K K K K K 6 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 61.6 78.0 68.4 66.5 72.6 79.8 71.5 80.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst 770 304 312 316 318 328 332 340 344 RICHMOND COUNTY ASHLEY CHAPEL ELEM CORDOVA ELEM ELLERBE JR HIGH FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS HAMLET JUNIOR HIGH HOFFMAN ELEM L J BELL ELEM MINERAL SPRINGS ELEM 4 K 6 K 7 K K K 6 6 9 3 9 6 3 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 58.8 78.8 72.6 67.9 73.3 83.5 83.8 71.0 ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst MI Exm Dst Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 38 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 770 346 348 360 364 366 368 370 RICHMOND COUNTY MONROE AVENUE ELEM RICHMOND SENIOR HIGH ROCKINGHAM JUNIOR HIGH ROHANEN JUNIOR HIGH ROHANEN PRI WEST ROCKINGHAM ELEM WASHINGTON STREET 4 10 7 7 PK K 4 6 12 9 9 3 6 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 71.4 44.5 79.1 61.4 89.2 70.2 71.1 ~ 5,9 9 9 ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst Exm NR 780 320 322 324 325 326 328 329 330 336 340 341 342 344 352 356 360 364 368 374 376 384 390 391 392 393 394 396 398 400 401 402 403 407 408 410 412 416 417 418 ROBESON COUNTY DEEP BRANCH ELEM EAST ROBESON PRI FAIRGROVE ELEM FAIRMONT HIGH FAIRMONT MID GREEN GROVE ELEM JANIE HARGRAVE ELEM L G CARROLL MID LITTLEFIELD MID LONG BRANCH ELEM LUMBERTON JUNIOR HIGH LUMBERTON SENIOR HIGH MAGNOLIA ELEM ORRUM MID OXENDINE ELEM PARKTON ELEM PEMBROKE ELEM PEMBROKE MID PETERSON ELEM PINEY GROVE ELEM PROSPECT ELEM R B DEAN ELEM RED SPRINGS HIGH REX-RENNERT ELEM RED SPRINGS MID ROSENWALD ELEM ROWLAND MID ROWLAND-NORMENT SAINT PAULS ELEM SAINT PAULS HIGH SOUTH ROBESON HIGH SAINT PAULS MID TANGLEWOOD ELEM SOUTHSIDE/ASHPOLE TOWNSEND MID UNION CHAPEL ELEM UNION ELEM W H KNUCKLES ELEM WEST LUMBERTON ELEM PK PK 4 9 5 PK PK 5 4 PK 8 10 PK 5 PK PK PK 6 K PK PK PK 9 PK 5 PK 6 K PK 9 9 6 K PK 5 PK PK PK PK 6 3 8 12 8 3 4 7 8 4 9 12 8 8 6 8 5 8 4 6 8 4 12 6 8 4 8 4 5 12 12 8 4 5 8 6 6 4 4 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes 61.5 70.3 62.2 37.4 50.3 76.1 56.1 71.8 68.6 65.3 66.2 42.5 57.5 65.9 71.7 53.7 60.9 69.2 53.1 62.8 70.0 69.1 25.6 59.5 55.9 61.8 66.0 70.4 65.3 41.7 30.1 65.8 77.0 58.0 47.2 60.6 67.7 51.5 63.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 5,9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Exm NR Exm NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exm NR Exp Exm NR Exp Exm Exm Exp Exp Exm MI Exm Exm NR Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm NR Exm NR NR NR Exm NR Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 39 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 780 ROBESON COUNTY 420 PURNELL SWETT HIGH 9 12 Yes Yes 38.1 ~ Exm 78A CIS ACAD 000 CIS ACAD 6 8 Yes No 29.0 ~ Exp 790 302 310 314 318 322 326 330 338 344 346 350 354 358 362 334 366 370 374 378 382 386 390 394 398 402 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY BETHANY ELEM CENTRAL ELEM DALTON MCMICHAEL HIGH DOUGLASS ELEM DRAPER ELEM HAPPY HOME ELEM J E HOLMES MID LAWSONVILLE AVE ELEM LEAKSVILLE-SPRAY ELEM LINCOLN MID MONROETON ELEM JOHN M MOREHEAD HIGH MOSS STREET ELEM NEW VISION INTER JOHN W DILLARD PRI REIDSVILLE HIGH REIDSVILLE INTER REIDSVILLE MID ROCKINGHAM CO HIGH SADLER ELEM SOUTH END ELEM STONEVILLE ELEM WEST ROCKINGHAM MID WENTWORTH ELEM WILLIAMSBURG ELEM PK K 8 PK PK PK 6 PK PK 5 K 8 K 3 PK 8 4 6 8 K PK PK 6 K PK 8 5 12 5 5 4 8 3 5 8 6 12 5 5 2 12 5 8 12 4 3 5 8 8 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 79.1 71.5 59.4 67.8 75.2 58.9 74.1 53.0 62.4 77.5 87.2 62.2 70.8 71.5 49.8 69.1 71.8 60.0 79.8 73.4 71.3 79.5 73.9 74.7 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp Exm Exp Exp NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm NR NR Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm 800 312 314 315 316 320 324 328 340 348 352 356 358 359 ROWAN-SALISBURY BOSTIAN ELEM CHARLES ERWIN MID CARROLL T OVERTON ELEM CHINA GROVE ELEM CHINA GROVE MID CLEVELAND ELEM CORRIHER LIPE MID EAST ROWAN HIGH ENOCHVILLE ELEM FAITH ELEM GRANITE QUARRY ELEM H D ISENBERG ELEM JOHN S HENDERSON ELEM K 6 K K 6 K 6 9 K PK K K K 5 8 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 78.7 79.2 68.7 70.7 81.5 72.3 84.0 61.9 73.0 75.5 66.9 66.4 63.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exp NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp NR Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 40 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary 800 360 362 363 364 368 372 373 376 377 392 396 400 408 410 412 ROWAN-SALISBURY HURLEY ELEM KNOLLWOOD ELEM KNOX MID LANDIS ELEM MORGAN ELEM MOUNT ULLA ELEM NORTH ROWAN ELEM NORTH ROWAN HIGH NORTH ROWAN MID ROCKWELL ELEM SALISBURY HIGH SOUTH ROWAN HIGH WEST ROWAN HIGH WEST ROWAN MID WOODLEAF ELEM K K 6 K K K K 9 6 K 9 9 9 6 K 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 12 12 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 810 324 326 328 336 340 342 344 348 350 356 360 364 378 380 384 388 396 400 404 352 RUTHERFORD COUNTY CHASE HIGH CHASE MID CLIFFSIDE ELEM DUNBAR ELEM EAST RUTHERFORD HIGH EAST RUTHERFORD MID ELLENBORO ELEM FOREST CITY ELEM FORREST W HUNT ELEM GREEN HILL ELEM HARRIS ELEM MOUNT VERNON ELEM R S MID RUTH ELEM R S CENTRAL RUTHERFORDTON ELEM SPINDALE ELEM SUNSHINE ELEM UNION MILLS ELEM GILKEY ELEM 9 6 PK 4 9 6 K K K K K K 6 K 9 K K K 3 K 12 8 5 5 12 8 5 3 5 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 5 2 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No 820 312 320 340 346 347 348 349 350 SAMPSON COUNTY CHARLES E PERRY ELEM CLEMENT ELEM HARGROVE ELEM HOBBTON ELEM HOBBTON MID HOBBTON HIGH LAKEWOOD HIGH MIDWAY ELEM K PK K K 6 9 9 K 5 8 5 5 8 12 12 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 67.4 75.6 60.3 78.2 76.9 75.4 66.3 44.4 58.3 73.3 56.8 61.8 59.8 75.9 72.0 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 9 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ Exm Exm Exp Exm Exp Exp NR Exm Exp Exm Exm MI Exm Exm Exp Exp Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No 54.6 73.6 69.9 74.2 53.8 77.6 77.1 59.7 76.0 67.5 78.1 71.6 79.2 71.8 62.3 88.4 70.3 77.8 70.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Exm NR Exp Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm NR Exm Exp Exm NR Exm Exm Dst NR Exm NR NR No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 58.4 76.2 66.0 79.1 78.2 56.1 50.2 75.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm MI Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 41 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 820 352 364 370 372 376 384 388 SAMPSON COUNTY MIDWAY HIGH PLAIN VIEW ELEM UNION MID ROSEBORO-SALEMBURG SALEMBURG ELEM UNION ELEM UNION HIGH 9 K 6 6 K PK 9 12 8 8 8 5 5 12 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes 58.0 80.9 77.7 67.1 70.0 75.0 51.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Dst Exm NR NR Exm Exm MI 821 304 316 308 320 CLINTON CITY BUTLER AVENUE ELEM LANDON C KERR ELEM CLINTON HIGH SAMPSON MID 3 PK 9 6 5 2 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 74.3 55.6 82.0 ~ 1 ~ 9 Exp Exp Exm Exm Dst 830 304 308 312 324 328 336 344 346 348 350 356 360 364 SCOTLAND COUNTY CARVER MID CENTRAL PRI COVINGTON STREET ELEM I E JOHNSON MID LAUREL HILL ELEM N LAURINBURG ELEM PATE GARDNER PRI SCOTLAND HIGH SHAW MID SYCAMORE LANE MID SOUTH SCOTLAND PRI WAGRAM PRI WASHINGTON PARK PRI 6 PK PK 6 PK PK PK 9 6 6 PK PK PK 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 8 5 5 5 Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 79.8 50.3 62.4 79.6 70.1 59.1 50.4 54.9 72.8 72.9 80.8 69.2 76.4 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exm NR NR Exm Exm NR NR Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm 840 302 303 304 308 310 312 316 320 324 328 330 332 336 340 344 348 STANLY COUNTY ALBEMARLE HIGH ALBEMARLE MID AQUADALE ELEM BADIN ELEM CENTRAL ELEM ENDY ELEM EAST ALBEMARLE ELEM LOCUST ELEM MILLINGPORT ELEM NEW LONDON ELEM NORTH ALBEMARLE ELEM NORTH STANLY HIGH NORWOOD ELEM OAKBORO ELEM RICHFIELD ELEM RIDGECREST ELEM 9 6 PK K K K K K K K K 9 K K K K 12 8 6 8 5 8 5 8 8 8 5 12 6 8 8 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 65.4 72.6 78.3 81.0 71.7 82.8 77.5 78.9 84.5 83.4 60.3 50.2 78.5 84.2 79.3 88.6 ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ 9 9 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 9 9 NR Exm Exm Exp Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 42 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 840 356 360 368 STANLY COUNTY SOUTH STANLY HIGH STANFIELD ELEM WEST STANLY HIGH 7 12 K 8 9 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 70.6 82.3 73.2 ~ 9 ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm MI 850 304 308 312 314 316 320 328 332 336 340 348 350 352 354 356 STOKES COUNTY CHESTNUT GROVE MID FRANCISCO ELEM GERMANTON ELEM MOUNT OLIVE ELEM KING ELEM LAWSONVILLE ELEM NANCY REYNOLDS ELEM N STOKES MID/HIGH PINE HALL ELEM PINNACLE ELEM SANDY RIDGE ELEM SE STOKES MID SOUTH STOKES HIGH LONDON ELEM WALNUT COVE ELEM 6 K K K PK PK K 7 K PK K 6 9 K PK 8 6 5 5 5 6 6 12 5 5 6 8 12 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No 77.7 63.0 74.2 75.3 69.4 82.2 60.7 60.2 74.0 73.5 73.1 71.1 59.4 69.0 54.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Exp NR Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst NR Exm Exm NR NR NR Exm NR NR 860 302 306 308 312 316 320 324 326 332 336 340 348 352 356 360 SURRY COUNTY CEDAR RIDGE ELEM CENTRAL MID COPELAND ELEM DOBSON ELEM EAST SURRY HIGH FLAT ROCK ELEM FRANKLIN ELEM J SAM GENTRY MID MOUNTAIN PARK ELEM NORTH SURRY HIGH PILOT MOUNTAIN MID SHOALS ELEM SURRY CENTRAL HIGH WESTFIELD ELEM WHITE PLAINS ELEM K 6 K PK 9 K K 7 K 9 6 K 9 K K 6 8 5 5 12 6 6 8 5 12 8 5 12 5 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 77.5 86.4 74.9 80.3 64.6 72.4 75.7 83.4 77.4 68.4 91.8 80.3 68.9 79.3 80.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst 861 ELKIN CITY 304 ELKIN ELEM 308 ELKIN HIGH PK 6 7 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes 83.3 76.5 ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm 862 MOUNT AIRY CITY 306 B THARRINGTON ELEM 312 MOUNT AIRY HIGH K 6 9 12 Yes Yes No Yes 80.9 72.2 ~ ~ Exp Dst Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 43 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 862 MOUNT AIRY CITY 316 MOUNT AIRY JR HIGH 320 JONES ELEM 7 8 PK 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.5 81.8 9 ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst 86K BRIDGES 000 BRIDGES 3 8 No No 54.0 ~ NR 870 314 318 320 324 SWAIN COUNTY SWAIN COUNTY HIGH SWAIN COUNTY MID SWAIN CO EAST ELEM SWAIN CO WEST ELEM 9 6 PK PK 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 69.2 87.1 77.7 85.8 ~ 9 ~ ~ Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst 880 304 308 312 318 324 328 336 TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY BREVARD ELEM BREVARD HIGH BREVARD MID PISGAH FOREST ELEM ROSMAN ELEM ROSMAN MID/HIGH T C HENDERSON ELEM K 9 6 K K 7 K 5 12 8 5 6 12 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 83.7 78.5 94.2 86.5 89.5 87.0 93.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc 88A BREVARD ACAD 000 BREVARD ACAD K 8 No No 83.5 ~ Dst NR 890 TYRRELL COUNTY 304 COLUMBIA HIGH 308 TYRRELL ELEM 6 12 PK 5 Yes Yes Yes No 58.0 69.5 ~ ~ Exm Exp 900 304 306 308 312 314 316 318 320 332 336 340 344 346 348 PK PK 6 K 6 9 K K K 9 K 9 6 9 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 74.8 53.9 70.9 82.7 66.0 59.9 89.3 83.2 72.5 49.7 79.3 69.2 85.6 71.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst MI Exm UNION COUNTY BENTON HEIGHTS ELEM EAST ELEM EAST UNION MID FAIRVIEW ELEM MONROE MID FOREST HILLS HIGH HEMBY BRIDGE ELEM INDIAN TRAIL ELEM MARSHVILLE ELEM MONROE HIGH NEW SALEM ELEM PARKWOOD HIGH PARKWOOD MID PIEDMONT HIGH 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 12 5 12 8 12 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 44 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 900 350 352 354 356 360 362 364 368 370 372 376 378 380 384 388 UNION COUNTY PIEDMONT MID PROSPECT ELEM SARDIS ELEM SHILOH ELEM SUN VALLEY HIGH SUN VALLEY MID UNION ELEM UNIONVILLE ELEM WALTER BICKETT ELEM WAXHAW ELEM WEDDINGTON ELEM WEDDINGTON MID WESLEY CHAPEL ELEM WESTERN UNION ELEM WINGATE ELEM 6 K K K 9 6 K K K K K 6 K K K 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No 88.3 80.6 80.2 92.3 71.1 87.3 70.5 86.3 58.8 80.1 90.6 94.6 83.5 83.2 57.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Dst NR 910 304 308 312 314 316 320 340 346 356 360 364 370 376 380 VANCE COUNTY AYCOCK ELEM CARVER ELEM CLARK STREET ELEM DABNEY ELEM EATON-JOHNSON MID HENDERSON MID NEW HOPE ELEM E O YOUNG JR ELEM PINKSTON STREET ELEM ROLLINS ELEM SOUTHERN VANCE HIGH NORTHERN VANCE HIGH L B YANCEY ELEM ZEB VANCE ELEM PK PK PK PK 7 7 PK PK PK PK 9 9 PK PK 6 6 6 6 8 8 6 6 6 6 12 12 6 6 No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No 60.5 64.4 55.9 70.8 71.5 59.5 55.1 63.5 39.8 67.7 43.3 46.2 57.4 78.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR Exp NR Exp NR NR LP NR Exm MI Exm Exm Exp 920 304 308 312 316 318 320 326 328 334 336 340 344 348 352 WAKE COUNTY ADAMS ELEM APEX ELEM APEX MID APEX HIGH ATHENS DRIVE HIGH AVERSBORO ELEM BAILEYWICK RD ELEM BAUCOM ELEM BRASSFIELD ELEM BRENTWOOD ELEM BRIARCLIFF ELEM BROOKS ELEM NEEDHAM BROUGHTON BUGG ELEM K K 6 9 9 K K K K K K K 9 K 6 5 8 12 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 87.0 87.8 84.7 80.2 77.8 74.3 81.4 88.1 84.7 73.6 78.1 73.4 71.3 79.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Exp Exm NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 45 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 920 356 360 362 364 368 376 380 384 388 390 391 396 398 399 400 404 408 410 411 412 414 415 416 420 424 428 436 440 442 446 447 448 452 454 456 460 464 468 469 470 471 472 473 476 480 488 492 496 500 6 6 K K 9 K K K 6 K 6 K PK 6 6 6 6 6 9 9 K K K K 6 9 9 K K K K K K K K K K K 4 K 6 6 9 K K K 6 PK 9 WAKE COUNTY CARNAGE MID CARROLL MID CARVER ELEM CARY ELEM CARY HIGH COMBS ELEM CONN ELEM CREECH ROAD ELEM DANIELS MID DAVIS DRIVE ELEM DAVIS DRIVE MID DOUGLAS ELEM DURANT ROAD ELEM DURANT ROAD MID EAST CARY MID EAST GARNER MID E MILLBROOK MID EAST WAKE MID EAST WAKE HIGH WILLIAM G ENLOE HIGH FARMINGTON WOODS FOX ROAD ELEM FULLER ELEM FUQUAY-VARINA ELEM FUQUAY-VARINA MID FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH GARNER HIGH GREEN ELEM HILBURN DRIVE ELEM HODGE ROAD ELEM HOLLY SPRINGS ELEM HUNTER ELEM JEFFREYS GROVE ELEM JONES DAIRY ELEM JOYNER ELEM KINGSWOOD ELEM KNIGHTDALE ELEM LACY ELEM LEESVILLE ROAD ELEM LEAD MINE ELEM LEESVILLE ROAD MID LIGON MID LEESVILLE ROAD HIGH LINCOLN HEIGHTS ELEM LOCKHART ELEM LYNN ROAD ELEM MARTIN MID MILLBROOK ELEM MILLBROOK HIGH 8 8 5 5 12 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 12 12 5 5 5 5 8 12 12 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 12 5 5 5 8 5 12 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Performance Composite 80.8 84.6 63.5 71.7 78.3 85.4 72.7 65.9 81.0 94.3 91.0 76.0 86.6 88.2 90.4 74.5 75.9 77.0 59.4 75.5 77.0 78.9 73.7 69.8 78.1 62.6 65.8 82.9 82.7 69.0 77.8 80.6 78.7 84.7 81.9 90.9 66.8 81.4 80.7 79.7 87.8 84.6 81.5 73.2 64.8 77.1 87.2 73.7 71.2 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 46 Status Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc MI NR Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 920 504 512 516 520 522 523 524 530 531 532 536 540 544 548 552 560 562 564 568 570 572 576 580 584 588 592 596 598 600 604 606 607 608 616 620 624 628 632 636 K 6 K K K K K K K K K K PK K 9 K 9 K K K K K K K 9 6 K K K 6 PK 6 6 K K K K K 6 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 12 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 5 8 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 92.8 72.6 81.5 83.8 93.9 86.1 84.1 78.2 92.0 70.2 86.3 73.5 71.1 83.9 73.9 77.4 77.5 83.6 76.1 88.2 73.1 75.2 68.4 72.0 68.6 81.5 77.2 87.8 72.6 88.8 87.4 92.0 82.2 83.2 77.1 75.2 83.0 78.7 75.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7,9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc 98R Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Exc Exp Exp Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm 92B EXPLORIS 000 EXPLORIS 6 7 Yes Yes 94.8 ~ Exm Exc 92C JOHN H BAKER 000 JOHN H BAKER 9 12 Yes Yes 32.4 9 Exm WAKE COUNTY MORRISVILLE ELEM NORTH GARNER MID NORTH RIDGE ELEM NORTHWOODS ELEM OAK GROVE ELEM OLIVE CHAPEL RD ELEM OLDS ELEM PENNY ROAD ELEM PLEASANT UNION ELEM POE ELEM POWELL ELEM RAND ROAD ELEM ROLESVILLE ELEM ROOT ELEM SANDERSON HIGH SMITH ELEM SOUTHEAST RALEIGH HIGH STOUGH ELEM SWIFT CREEK ELEM TIMBER DRIVE ELEM UNDERWOOD ELEM VANCE ELEM VANDORA SPRINGS ELEM WAKE FOREST ELEM WAKE F-ROLESVILLE HIGH WAKE F-ROLESVILLE MID WASHINGTON ELEM WEATHERSTONE ELEM WENDELL ELEM WEST CARY MID WEST LAKE ELEM WEST LAKE MID WEST MILLBROOK MID WILBURN ELEM WILEY ELEM WILLOW SPRINGS ELEM YORK ELEM ZEBULON ELEM ZEBULON MID Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 47 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 92D MAGELLAN CTR 000 MAGELLAN CTR 4 8 Yes Yes 97.2 ~ Exm Exc 92E STERLING MONTESSORI 000 STERLING MONTESSORI OK 7 Yes Yes 75.6 ~ Exm 92F FRANKLIN ACAD 000 FRANKLIN ACAD K No No 64.8 ~ NR 92G EAST WAKE ACAD 000 EAST WAKE ACAD OK 8 Yes No 81.9 ~ Exp Dst 92H SANKORE SCHOOL 000 SANKORE SCHOOL 6 8 No No 32.3 ~ LP 930 330 340 344 348 352 354 WARREN COUNTY MARIAM BOYD ELEM NORTHSIDE ELEM SOUTH WARREN ELEM VAUGHAN ELEM WARREN COUNTY HIGH WARREN COUNTY MID K K K K 9 6 5 5 5 5 12 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 59.6 66.3 63.9 73.0 38.8 63.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exp 940 306 308 314 316 328 WASHINGTON COUNTY CRESWELL ELEM CRESWELL HIGH PINES ELEM PLYMOUTH HIGH WASHINGTON CO UNION PK 7 PK 9 5 6 12 4 12 8 No No No Yes No No No No No No 42.2 46.7 49.7 35.4 63.6 ~ 9* * ~ ~ LP NR NR Exp NR 950 308 312 316 320 322 324 328 332 336 WATAUGA COUNTY BETHEL ELEM BLOWING ROCK ELEM COVE CREEK ELEM GREEN VALLEY ELEM HARDIN PARK ELEM MABEL ELEM PARKWAY ELEM VALLE CRUCIS ELEM WATAUGA HIGH K K PK PK PK PK K K 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 76.5 93.4 81.0 88.2 89.5 75.2 85.8 89.3 75.6 9 ~ 9 9 9 ~ 9 9 ~ Exm Exm Exc MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp 5 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 48 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 960 312 314 316 318 324 326 329 330 331 334 335 336 337 340 344 348 360 370 372 376 380 384 390 450 454 5 K K K 9 5 K 9 6 K 9 K 5 5 K 6 6 K 7 K 9 K K K K WAYNE COUNTY BROGDEN MID BROGDEN PRI CARVER ELEM CARVER HEIGHTS ELEM CHARLES B AYCOCK HIGH DILLARD MID EASTERN WAYNE ELEM EASTERN WAYNE HIGH EASTERN WAYNE MID FREMONT ELEM GOLDSBORO HIGH GRANTHAM GOLDSBORO MID GREENWOOD MID MEADOW LANE ELEM MOUNT OLIVE MID NORWAYNE MID ROSEWOOD ELEM ROSEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL STREET ELEM SOUTHERN WAYNE HIGH SPRING CREEK NORTH DRIVE ELEM NORTHEAST ELEM NORTHWEST ELEM 8 4 5 4 12 8 5 12 8 5 12 8 8 8 4 8 8 6 12 4 12 8 4 5 5 Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 64.3 60.7 67.1 48.7 62.8 66.6 79.7 66.2 82.4 71.7 30.2 82.5 69.7 87.9 78.4 75.3 80.9 83.6 64.7 63.3 49.9 79.3 59.8 79.1 81.5 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ NR Exm NR Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst 96A BRIGHT HORIZONS ACAD 000 BRIGHT HORIZONS ACAD OK 6 No No 42.4 * NR 96C DILLARD ACAD 000 DILLARD ACAD K 3 No No 33.3 * NR 970 308 310 312 315 320 324 336 338 340 344 PK K K 6 9 PK 4 K PK PK 5 8 5 8 12 5 8 3 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 65.9 79.0 91.5 77.6 64.2 72.9 80.0 91.1 76.9 76.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exm Exc Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm MI Exm WILKES COUNTY BOOMER-FERGUSON ELEM C B ELLER ELEM C C WRIGHT ELEM J F WOODWARD MID EAST WILKES HIGH FAIRPLAINS ELEM MILLERS CREEK INTER MILLERS CREEK PRI MORAVIAN FALLS ELEM MT PLEASANT ELEM Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 49 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 970 348 352 356 360 368 370 376 380 388 390 392 K K 9 PK K PK PK PK 9 9 K 8 8 12 5 8 8 8 8 12 12 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.1 78.8 66.4 76.6 72.6 75.7 75.4 78.3 65.1 67.0 86.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Dst 97A ELIZABETH GRINTON ACAD 000 ELIZABETH GRINTON ACAD K 6 Yes Yes 57.1 ~ Exm MI 980 308 317 318 320 324 336 338 340 342 348 352 356 360 364 380 384 388 390 392 396 400 K 6 9 K 6 9 6 K 9 K K K K K 6 6 K 6 K K K 5 8 12 5 8 12 8 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 5 8 5 5 5 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 67.0 66.9 54.2 79.0 75.1 58.6 73.9 78.5 61.8 78.8 87.7 70.4 87.8 84.4 78.8 81.8 86.2 75.1 81.0 79.9 72.7 ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exm Exp Exm MI Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exm Dst Exm Exm 98A SALLIE B. HOWARD 000 SALLIE B. HOWARD K 7 Yes No 45.8 ~ Exp 990 304 308 312 K 8 K 8 K 8 No Yes No No No No 70.1 78.3 68.5 ~ 9 9 NR Exp NR WILKES COUNTY MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM MULBERRY ELEM NORTH WILKES HIGH N WILKESBORO ELEM ROARING RIVER ELEM RONDA-CLINGMAN ELEM TRAPHILL ELEM UNION ELEM/MID WEST WILKES HIGH WILKES CENTRAL HIGH WILKESBORO ELEM WILSON COUNTY B O BARNES ELEM DARDEN-VICK MID BEDDINGFIELD HIGH ELM CITY ELEM ELM CITY MID FIKE HIGH FOREST HILLS MID GARDNERS ELEM JAMES HUNT HIGH LEE WOODARD ELEM LUCAMA ELEM MARGARET HEARNE ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM ROCK RIDGE ELEM SPEIGHT MID SPRINGFIELD MID STANTONSBURG ELEM TOISNOT MID VINSON-BYNUM ELEM WELLS ELEM WINSTEAD ELEM YADKIN COUNTY BOONVILLE ELEM COURTNEY ELEM EAST BEND ELEM Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 50 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 1998-1999 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth/Gain Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 990 316 320 322 324 326 328 336 YADKIN COUNTY FALL CREEK ELEM FORBUSH ELEM FORBUSH HIGH JONESVILLE ELEM STARMOUNT HIGH WEST YADKIN ELEM YADKINVILLE ELEM PK PK 9 PK 9 K K 8 8 12 8 12 8 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No 80.8 82.2 57.9 79.1 54.6 72.6 74.3 9 9 ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp 995 304 308 312 316 320 324 328 330 336 YANCEY COUNTY BALD CREEK ELEM BEE LOG ELEM BURNSVILLE ELEM CANE RIVER MID CLEARMONT ELEM EAST YANCEY MID MICAVILLE ELEM MOUNTAIN HERITAGE HIGH SOUTH TOE ELEM K K K 6 K 6 K 9 K 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 12 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 74.2 79.7 82.9 88.4 74.3 85.9 77.1 73.7 80.0 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm MI Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst Exm Exm MI Exm Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth/Gain; Exm-Exemplary Growth/Gain; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exemptions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Alt School Sufficient Data; 3-Alt School Insufficient Data; 4-Senior High (Gr.9-12); 5-Senior High (Gr.10-12); 6-High School 1st yr; 7-High School 2nd yr; 8-EOC Moved; 9-School with Insufficient Data; 10-High School Demographic Changes; *Confidence Interval Applied; (~ No Special Conditions) Growth/Gain and Performance of Schools Page 51 Status
