Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 1 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
RE: .msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi Ie\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 2 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginteriano@gmail.com]
Friday, April 22, 20111:55 PM
‘Eric Opiela’
RE:
SSVR.xlsx
Below 55 of what number...dont share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of the SSVR districts. Nixon map
drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both were lost by McCain and Perry.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eopieIaericooiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Do yall have the data on # VRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between Solomons/Nixon State House
Plans for Lamar? See below. If y’all are too busy, just let me know and I can load it up and do the counts, but
with 300 districts between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had that already.
Thanks
EQ
Begin forwarded message:
From: lamarsmith21çjmail.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopiela(ericopiela.com>, “Jennifer Brown”
<Jennifer.Y. Brownmail. house.qov>
Reply-To: lamarsmith21(qmaiI.com
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up st house redist and favor the nixon map over the
solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. I told them re vra and asked them to ck to see how many of nixon
dists were below 55. I didn’t kno answer but wanted to raise questions about it. Is solomons map better in that
regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 3 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
SSVR.xlsx
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
_1
DOCUMENT INFO
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
1
2
104
116
117
118
119
123
124
125
140
143
145
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
74
75
76
77
79
80
CURRENT-29
165,121 90.90%
148,929 55.30%
143,582 53.80%
151,882 55.30%
201,177 82.30%
142,621 80.80%
182,363 7’
172,288 6
215,412 6
185,892 E
171,951 84.80%
148,370 71.80%
143,566 5
219,408
132,715 5
132,567 7
147,172 6
149,638 69.70%
Added 90
131,900 5
142,944 5
220,360 5
152,809
157,106
132,442 57.90%
178,044 56.10%
162,162 56.10%
139,275 59.30%
127,381 66.00%
132,730 66.20%
Added 148
I
I
I
G
SPANISH S
HI
IKILI
I
-
MINI
[.
01
S VOTER. tEISTRATlON COMPARISON
SUBSTITUTE #2 30
31
168,636
Up
91.30%
Up
Eliminated Nueces District
34
169,887
Up
Up
63.70%
35
172,482
Up
53.40%
Down
36
173,981
Up
85.30%
Up
37
169,364
Up
Down
78.00%
38
167,793
Up
Up
77.90%
39
175,383
Up
Up
83.10%
40
159,381
Down
64.60%
Down
41
172,374
Up
Up
86.70%
42
160,647
Down
86.00%
Up
43
171,735
Up
Up
72.40%
74
Up
170,005
Up
68.00%
75
159,691
Down
Up
81.20%
76
159,760
Down
Down
81.30%
77
159,949
Down
Down
66.40%
/9
Down
160,658
Up
69.30%
80
Down
160,252
Up
78.90%
90
159,352
Down
50.10%
Up
104 172,784
Up
Down
50.10%
116 171,463
Up
Down
51.60%
117 171,249
Up
Down
50.10%
161,851
Down
Up
60.30%
159,180
Down
Down
51.40%
123 175,674
Up
Down
54.30%
124 174,823
Up
Down
54.60%
125 174,549
Up
Up
59.10%
140 172,794
Up
Down
51.70%
143 165,808
Down
Down
52.10%
145 173,161
Up
Down
50.50%
148 170,196
Up
Up
50.30%
11J3fl Down:
:14/30 :Dwn
Ii
PROPOSED -28
168,636
Up
91.30%
Up
Eliminated Nueces District
34
169,887
Up
63.70%
Up
35
172,482
Up
53.40%
Down
36
173,981
Up
85.30%
Up
37
169,364
Up
78.00%
Down
Up
77.90%
Up
• 167,793
I
Up
83.10%
Up
139 175,383
I
I
40
159,381
Down
64.60%
Down
41
172,374
Up
86.70%
Up
42
160,647
Down
86.00%
Up
43
171,735
Up
72.40%
Up
74
170,005
Up
68.00%
Up
75
159,691
Down
81.20%
Up
76
159,760
Down
81.30%
Down
77
159,949
Down
66.40%
Down
70
160,658
Down
69.30%
Up
80
160,252
Down
78.90%
Up
Added 90
104 172,784
Up
50.10%
Down
116 171,463
Up
51.60%
Down
117 171,249
Up
50.10%
Down
R
161,851
Up
Down
60.30%
9
159,180
Down
51.40%
Down
123 175,674
Up
54.30%
Down
124 174,823
Up
54.60%
Down
125 174,549
Up
Up
59.10%
140 172,794
Up
51.70%
Down
143 172,147
Up
55.60%
Down
145 168,480
Up
61.70%
Down
Added 148
I
14/28:Down:
I 9/28 Down I
31
AIBICIDIEIFI
116
117
118
119
123
124
125
140
143
145
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
74
75
76
77
79
80
[-iT—
17.
159,381
172,374
164,470
171,735
162,815
159,691
159,760
159,949
160,658
174,191
Dropped
Dropped
171,463
171,249
161,851
159,302
175,674
174,823
174,549
172,794
172,147
168,480
Dropped
1
1
1
NIXON-
PIQIR
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 4 of 81
55.20%
81.20%
81
70
t
51.71
5
C
59.11
31
32
33
34
I
çfl.7j
30
b29
77
.3
22 04
23 51.60%
24 5
25 60.30%
26 51.40%
.7
15
16
17
18
19
14
11
27
3
4 S
63.7’
5
6 53.9’
7
8
9
10
64.60%
12
13
jsI
Li__
T
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 5 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 6 of 81
0
z
C
C
=
C
C
D
C
C
D
0
0
0
0
U,
0
0
C
e.1
J
C
C
C
D
0
0
C
C
0
00
00
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
C
cL
00
C
Lf
C
0
00
00
00
00
1
:1
00
C
D
D
C
C
00
C
00
C
cC
cc
rJ
.I
•
I
C
U
C,
U
F
LU
00
1
00
0
cC
w
D
I-)
CrC
00
00
00
C
cC,
00
U,
1
00
00
r’J
00
00
00
00
00
r.J
C
C
crC
00
1
00
00
C
C
00
cC
00
C
0
-l
-.4
‘-4
.-1
00
‘-4
00
crC
C
-.4
00
C
r’J
crC
CO
00
00
0
crC
00
00
CrC
-1
CCC
-
r’J
1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 7 of 81
[
C
0
0
0
0
0
D
x cc
0
0
cc
cc
0
>
C 0
N
C
C
C
c_ c 0
0
0
DD
0
0
0
0
cc N cc
cc cc cc
N
CO
0
0
c 0
0
CCC
0
c_ 0
0
0
D
CCC
c
c_
DDD
coo
000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cc -j ccc cc
c
cc
cc q cc C
cc N cc
cc cc cc cc cc cc cc -l N cc N cc
CO N cc cc N cc N cc cc N cc N cc N cc cc
CCC
CCC
C
oco
cooo
o
00DD0D0D
0
0
cc
0
I,
0
0
0
c h cc
cc
cc N cc cc cc In
cc cc cc cc cc cc In
N
0
0
cc
C,
N
N
C
C
c_c_c_c_c_c_
o_
DDDDDD
cc
cc
cc
U-
E
LU
1
cc
uJ
N
CO
N
cc
cc
cc
N
N
cc
cc
cC
cc
0-
cc
oD
0
cc
cc
cC
cc
-
cc
cc
N
cc
cc
C
CD
0
cc,
CD
In
10
cc cc 0 cc cc
N cc N U cc
— — — — —
cc N cc cc 0
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
cc cc cc
Ci
cc
cc cc
N
cc
—
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc cc cc
a,
cc
N N cc
CO
N
N
N
N
N
cc
Ui
cc
In
cc
cc
N
cc
N
cc
-1
cc
cc
In
In
C
0
N
C
CC
0000 cc ODDDD
0000000
cc
ID
In
oD
0
N
N
In cc
N
CCCCCC
cc
N
cc
cc cc cc cc cc
cc cc N
N ID cc
cc cc cc cc cc
cc
0
C
0
0
cc
cc
cc
cc
q
0
c_I
0
U
U
U
1
c
D
cc
cc
cc
In
N.
0
cc
N.
C
0 0DDDDD
00
cc cc cc cc 0 cc cc, cc 0 cc cc
cc cc cc In cc N N cc cc cc 0
cc
cc
cc
cc
c
CO
In
ID
0
N
N
N
cc
cc
N.
cc
0
cc
In
N
—
— —
cc
cc
cc cc
N
N
cc cc cc cc cc, cc cc N
N N cc In N N N N
cc cc cc cc cc cc — —
N
N
cc
CO
u,
0
In
N
crc cc cc cc
In
cC
Lfl
ID
N
cc
N
CO
-i
cc
cc
IC
—
cc 0
C C
0
0
U
0.
0.
0
0
U
—
cc cc N cc cc cc cc cc N 0 cc
cc N cc cc 0 0 cc
0 cc cc cc cc N N N cc cc cc
N N N. N. cc cc 0
cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
-
U
I
cc
cc
Z- N
cc cc
‘
CO
In
N
N
N
cc
-i
cc
cc
N
cc
N
CO
cc cc
cc
cc
cc c
cc cc
r
cc
cc -c
4
Ui
ccmcc
Incc
cc
<
N
cci
oi
cc cc cc
cc
cc
,
0
N
cc cc
cc cc
cc cc cc
cc
N.
cc
cc
cc
CO
N
cc
cc
cc
cc
crc cc N
N
cc
cc
a,
N
N
cc
cc
cncc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
0
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
N
Ci
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
cc
NccccoccNrncccc
N
N
cc
o
cc cc
N cc
cc
cc CO
0
N
cc
cc
0
cc
cc
cc
cc
0
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
crc
cc
cc
N.
cc
cc
N
N
cc
cc
0
0
N
cc
cc cc
0
0
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc o cc
cc
cc
0
N
-4
N
C
N
C_I
In
cc
N
cc
cc
cc
N
N
CO
cc
cc
cc cc
N
cc
cc
cc,
cc cc
cc
cc
cc
cc cc cc
cc cc cc cc
cc
10
NCOcco0
N
CO
cc
N
cc
cc
N
CO
cc
cc cc
0
cc
N
N
N
N
N
cc
cc
N
cc
0
C
0
N
cc
N
cc
cc
ci cc
N
cc
cc
N
CO
cc
NCOcc
ID
N
N
N
N
cc cc
©
N
c-_I cc cc cc cc
cc cc cc
N
0
cc cc
cc
cc
N
cc
cc
N.
0
cc
N
N
N
cc
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
cc
0
0
N
0
cc
cc
cc
cc
N
N
cc
cc
cc
0
N
cc
cc
N
N
cc
-1
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
ccccInocccccccc
cc
cc cc
cc cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
CO
cc
cc
Ci
cc
cc
U,
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
N
N
0
cc
cc
N
cc
cc
CO
cc
cc
C
cc
cc
cc
N
cc
ci
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 8 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 9 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: RE:.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi le\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 10 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Friday, April 22, 20111:59 PM
Gerardo Interiano
Re: RE:
Lamar meant below 55 McCain or Perry. Is there an analysis already done between the two using those
benchmarks?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, “Gerardo Interiano” <ginterianogmaiL corn> wrote:
Below 55 of what nurnber...don’t share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of the SSVR districts.
Nixon map drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both were lost by
McCain and Perry.
From: Eric Opiela mailto:eopielaericopiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Do y’all have the data on # \TRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between Solomons/Nixon
State House Plans for Lamar? See below. If y’all are too busy, just let me know and I can load it
up and do the counts, but with 300 districts between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had
that already.
Thanks
EQ
Begin forwarded message:
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 11 of 81
From: lamarsmith2l cgmail.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopielaericopiela.com>, “Jennifer Brown”
<Jennifer.Y. Brownmail.house.qov>
Reply-To: lamarsmith2l (gmail.com
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up St house redist and favor the nixon map
over the solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. I told them re vra and asked them to ck to
see how many of nixon dists were below 55. I didn’t kno answer but wanted to raise questions
about it. Is solomons map better in that regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
<SSVR.xlsx>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 12 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
RE: RE:.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 13 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginterianogmail.com]
Friday, April 22, 2011 2:02 PM
‘Eric Opiela’
RE: RE:
I do, but all of that is in the office at work.
From: Eric Opiela 1mailto:eopielaericoDiela.comJ
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:59 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE:
Lamar meant below 55 McCain or Perry. Is there an analysis already done between the two using those
benchmarks?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, “Gerardo Tnteriano” <ginteriano(gmail.com> wrote:
Below 55 of what number...don’t share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of the SSVR districts.
Nixon map drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both were lost by
McCain and Perry.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eopielaericojiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Do y’all have the data on # VRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between Solomons/Nixon
State House Plans for Lamar? See below. If y’all are too busy, just let me know and I can load it
up and do the counts, but with 300 districts between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had
that already.
Thanks
EQ
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 14 of 81
Begin forwarded message:
From: lamarsmith21@gmail.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopieIaericopieIa.com>, “Jennifer Brown”
<Jen nifer.Y. Brown(mail. house.qov>
Reply-To: Iamarsmith21gmail.com
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up St house redist and favor the nixon map
over the solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. T told them re vra and asked them to ck to
see how many of nixon dists were below 55. I didn’t kno answer but wanted to raise questions
about it. Is solomons map better in that regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
<SSVR.xlsx>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 15 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: RE: 1
RE:
m
sg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 16 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Friday, April 22, 2011 2:07 PM
Gerardo Interiano
Re: RE: RE:
I’ll wait on it and tell Lamar we’ll get it for him on Monday. Didn’t look forward to running stats on 300
districts.
Thanks,
EQ
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Gerardo Interiano <ginteriano@gmaiLcom> wrote:
I do, but all of that is in the office at work.
From: Eric Opiela [maiIto:eoiela©ericoiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:59 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE:
Lamar meant below 55 MeCain or Perry. is there an analysis already done between the two
using those benchmarks?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, “Gerardo Interiano” <ginteriano(gmail.com> wrote:
Below 55 of what number...don’t share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of
the SSVR districts. Nixon map drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both
were lost by McCain and Perry.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eopiela©ericopiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 17 of 81
Do y’all have the data on # VRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between
Solomons/Nixon State House Plans for Lamar? See below. If y’all are too busy,
just let me know and I can load it up and do the counts, but with 300 districts
between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had that already.
Thanks
EO
Begin forwarded message:
From: lamarsmith21@qmail.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopielaericopieIa.com>, “Jennifer Brown”
<Jennifer.Y. Brown(maiI. house.qov>
Reply-To: Iamarsmith2l qmail.com
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up st house redist and favor
the nixon map over the solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. I told them re
vra and asked them to ck to see how many of nixon dists were below 55. 1 didn’t
kno answer but wanted to raise questions about it. Is solomons map better in that
regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
<S SVR.xlsx>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 18 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
RE: RE: RE:.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 19 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginteriano@gmail.com]
Friday, April 22, 2011 2:08 PM
‘Eric Opiela’
RE: RE: RE:
Tell him Monday or Tuesday...but what does he want to do with it? That’s not something that we are sharing with
anyone.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eoDieIaThericoDiela .coml
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:07 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE: RE:
I’ll wait on it and tell Lamar we’ll get it for him on Monday. Didn’t look forward to running stats on 300
districts.
Thanks,
EQ
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Gerardo Interiano <gjnIeriano@maiLcom> wrote:
I do, but all of that is in the office at work.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eopiela©ericopiela .com)
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:59 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE:
Lamar meant below 55 McCain or Perry. Is there an analysis already done between the two
using those benchmarks?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, “Gerardo Interiano” <ginterianogmaiLcom> wrote:
Below 55 of what number...don’t share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of
the SSVR districts. Nixon map drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both
were lost by McCain and Perry.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 20 of 81
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eopiela©ericopiela.comj
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Do y’all have the data on # VRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between
Solomons/Nixon State House Plans for Lamar? See below. If y’all are too busy,
just let me know and I can load it up and do the counts, but with 300 districts
between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had that already.
Thanks
EO
Begin forwarded message:
From: lamarsmith2l grnail.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopiela@ericopiela.com>, “Jennifer Brown”
<Jennifer.Y. Brown(rnail. house.cov>
Reply-To: lamarsmith2l @qrnaii corn
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up st house redist and favor
the nixon map over the solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. I told them re
vra and asked them to ck to see how many of nixon dists were below 55. I didn’t
kno answer but wanted to raise questions about it. Is solomons map better in that
regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
<SSVR.xlsx>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 21 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: RE: RE: RE:.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi le\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 22 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Friday, April 22, 2011 2:12 PM
Gerardo Interiano
Re: RE: RE: RE:
I think he wants to be comfortable what he said to SA Tea Party folks was true.
EQ
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Gerardo Interiano wrote:
Tell him Monday or Tuesday...but what does he want to do with it? That’s not something that we are sharing with
anyone.
From: Eric Opiela [ma ilto:eorielaericoiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:07 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE: RE:
I’ll wait on it and tell Lamar well get it for him on Monday. Didn’t look forward to running stats on 300
districts.
Thanks,
EQ
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Gerardo Interiano <ginteriano(gmail.com> wrote:
I do, but all of that is in the office at work.
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eoiela©ericopiela.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:59 PM
To: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: RE:
Lamar meant below 55 McCain or Perry. Is there an analysis already done between the two
using those benchmarks?
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, “Gerardo Interiano” <ginterianogmail.com> wrote:
Below 55 of what number...don’t share this with ANYONE but here is a comparison of
the SSVR districts. Nixon map drops it by the current benchmark of 29 to 27.
As far as Republican seats, he is overreaching. He drew two seats in Travis and both
were lost by McCain and Perry.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 23 of 81
From: Eric Opiela [mailto:eorJielaericoDieIa .com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Denise Davis (home)
Cc: Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Fwd:
Do y’all have the data on # VRA and # of GOP under 55% comparison between
Solomons/Nixon State House Plans for Lamar? See below. If yall are too busy,
just let me know and I can load it up and do the counts, but with 300 districts
between the two, I thought I’d ask to see if you had that already.
Thanks
EO
Begin forwarded message:
From: lamarsmith21gmaiI.com
Date: April 22, 2011 12:19:05 PM CDT
To: “Eric Opiela” <eopielaericopiela.com>, “Jennifer Brown!!
<Jennifer.Y. Brownmail. house.qov>
Reply-To: Iamarsmith2l (qmaiI.com
Met w tea party folks in sa this morn. They brought up st house redist and favor
the nixon map over the solomons map bec it creates more gop dists. I told them re
vra and asked them to ck to see how many of nixon dists were below 55. I didn’t
kno answer but wanted to raise questions about it. Is solomons map better in that
regard.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
<SSVR.xlsx>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 24 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 25 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Monday, May 30, 2011 7:30 PM
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com
Gerardo Interiano
Re:
Ryan Downton <rdowntonplatinummri. corn>
I don’t think we mess with quicos district--for your sake and his. His is barely performing
(or not depending on your measure) right now; add Rs (which will be Anglos) and you put a
neon sign on it telling the court to redraw it. Bring down your numbers and you’ll have a
Deni opponent every time. And they won’t be Lainey Melnick.
EO
On May 30, 2011, at 7:13 PM, laniarsmith2lgmail.com wrote:
> Do u have ryans email. Pls pass on. Wld it help quico on the margin i-f I gave him 3k more
in bexar (either gop or hispanics) and took edwards co in exchange. Need to check
demographics of edwards. If helps check w quico or scott.
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 26 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
FHename:
(No m
1
subject/fllena
sg
me)
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
19 Ie\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 27 of 81
Iamarsmith21gmaiI.com
Monday, May 30, 2011 8:12 PM
Eric Opiela
Gerardo Interiano
Still want to make offer re edwards. Only 3k. Maybe .1 percent but cld help quico.
Also didn’t realize I had part of guadalupe.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 28 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
Re: .msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726l 1\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 29 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Monday, May 30, 2011 8:16 PM
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com
Gerardo Interiano
Re:
I didn’t think Lamar had Guadalupe.. .but its in the system printout... .is this a mistake,
Gerardo? It’s only 13k people.
ED
On May 30, 2011, at 8:12 PM, lamarsmith21(gmail.com wrote:
>
Still want to make offer re edwards. Only 3k. Maybe .1 percent but cid help quico.
>
> Also didn’t realize I had part of guadalupe.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 30 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Fwd: Special Session Proposed Map CD
msg
1
24
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 31 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Tuesday, May 31, 2011 fI8AM
Ryan Downton; Gerardo Interiano
lamarsmith2l©gmail.com camp
Fwd: Special Session Proposed Map CD 24
Please see below; if possible.
Thanks
EQ
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kenny Marchant <marchantkengmaiI.com>
Date: May31, 2011 1:10:30AM CDT
To: Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com>
Subject: Re: Special Session Proposed Map CD 24
Eric, one change, its easy, no population. My grand babies go to
Hockaday School on forest lane AND Inwood. I have the north side of
forest Pete has the south side. Please go across the street and
pluck the campus out of Pete and put in my district. There will be no
population.this agreeable and I will ask Burt to do it. Thanks km
,
Sent from my iPad
On May 31, 2011, at 12:12 AM, Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com> wrote:
Congressman Marchant
The House and Senate have reached a compromise between their congressional redistricting
maps today. The House and Senate consensus congressional proposal will likely be released
today; Congressman Smith wanted me to describe your district under the proposal to you. Note
that the House and Senate are still working on minor changes, and I will update you if your
district changes. CD 24 will be 58.4 % McCain and will contain the following counties (100%
unless otherwise noted): Dallas (14%-330,826), Denton (17%-112,782), and Tarrant (14%254,880). As we discussed today, it’s largely the same district proposed in the delegation
proposal.
Please let me know you received this and do not hesitate to call or email if you have any
questions.
Eric
M
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 32 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 33 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Fwd: Stats for Seliger/Solomons as
introduced. msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Stra us\DIS
-.
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 34 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:55 PM
Gerardo Interiano
Fwd: Stats for Seliger/Solomons as introduced
SeligerSolomonslntroduced.xls; SeligerSolomonslntroducedByCounty.doc
Begin forwarded message:
From: “Brown, Jennifer Y.” <Jennifer. Y.Brown@rnail. house. gov>
To: “eopiela@ericopiela. corn” <eopiela@ericopiela. corn>, “Smith, CLS”
<CLS.Smtthi!Jiousegov>
Subject: Fw: Stats for Seliger/Solomons as introduced
I got this from dub this afternoon assume same that we sent out earlier. Bcc so not sure he sent it to eric
want to check it out.
Jennifer Young Brown
Chief of Staff
Congressman Lamar Smith
2409 RHOB
Jennifer.Y.Brown@mail.house.gov
From: Dub Maines [maiIto:dubmainesicjmaiI.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 05:30 PM
To: Dub Maines <dubmaines(gmaiI.com>
Subject: Stats for Seliger/Solomons as introduced
Attached are the political stats and the county break-downs of the map that Senator Seliger and
Representative Solomons introduced for Congressional redistricting. This is, of course, public
information.
Dub Maines
972-898-6796
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 35 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Nina’s quote.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 36 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Tuesday, May 31, 201110:31 PM
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com camp; jybblb2@aol.com Brown; Gerardo Interiano
Nina’s quote
MALDEF reaction
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund was not impressed.
“The Solomons-Seliger map does not increase the number of Latino-opportunity congressional districts despite the fact
that 65 percent of the state’s growth over the past decade was comprised of Latinos,” said Nina Perales, MALDEF’s vice
president for litigation. “Instead, the map gerrymanders more than 9 million Latinos in Texas to make sure that we have no
more electoral opportunity than we did in 1991
Read
more: http://www.chron.com!disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7589548.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=fe
ed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A-i-houstonchronicle%2Fpolitics+%28chron.com+-+Politics%29#ixzzl NzXP7pWC
1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 37 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: Nina’s 1
quote
m
sg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi Ie\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 38 of 81
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com
Wednesday, June01, 2011 5:44AM
Eric Opiela; Jennifer Brown; Gerardo Interiano
Re: Nina’s quote
But she is ignoring the new coalition dist betw sa and austin, making the old 27 performing, and increasing the
hisp pop of the old 23. What does she kno that we don’t? GI--Assume the AG is totally on board?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:40 -0500
To: lamarsmith2 1 grnail.corn camp<lamarsmith2 1 (gmail. corn>; jybblb2@aol.com
Brown<jybblb2(aol. corn>; Gerardo Interiano<ginteriano(rnail. corn>
Subject: Nina’s quote
MALDEF reaction
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund was not impressed.
“The Solomons-Seliger map does not increase the number of Latino-opportunity congressional districts despite the fact
that 65 percent of the state’s growth over the past decade was comprised of Latinos,” said Nina Perales, MALDEF’s vice
president for litigation. “Instead, the map gerrymanders more than 9 million Latinos in Texas to make sure that we have no
more electoral opportunity than we did in 1991
Read
more: http:llwww.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitanl7589548.html?utm_source=feedburner&utmmedium=fe
ed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fpolitics+%28chron.com+-+Politics%29#ixzzl NzXP7pWC
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 39 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
(No subject/filename).msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 40 of 81
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com
Wednesday, June01, 2011 6:58AM
Eric Opiela; Gerardo Interiano
Jennifer Brown
Just read in todays nati lournal that quico drops -From 66 to 63 hisp pop. Hope not true or
dangerous.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 41 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
msg
1
Re: Nina’s quote
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 42 of 81
Iamarsmith21gmail.com
Wednesday, June 01, 2011 7:40 AM
Gerardo Interiano; Eric Opiela; Jennifer Brown
Re: Nina’s quote
Tks. That will help.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: “Gerardo Interiano” <ginteriano(Zmai1 .com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:20:18 -0500
To: <1.m I.Sm h2 gm iLccmi>; ‘Eric Opiela’<Qpji
Brown’<jybblb2@aol. corn>
Subject: RE: Nina’s quote
ctcp.pc1&c.Qm>; ‘Jennifer
And yes. We’re working very closely with the AG.
From: lamarsmith2l @mail.com [mailto: Iamarsmith2l©cimaiLcom]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:44 AM
To: Eric Opiela; Jennifer Brown; Gerardo Interiano
Subject: Re: Nina’s quote
But she is ignoring the new coalition dist betw sa and austin, making the old 27 performing, and increasing the
hisp pop of the old 23. What does she kno that we don’t? GI--Assume the AG is totally on board?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Eric Opiela <eQia@jcopiejacom>
Date: Tue, 31 May2011 22:30:40 -0500
To: lamarsmith2 1 (ZIgmail corn camp<lamarsmith2 1 @gmail. corn>; jybblb2(aol. corn
Brown<jybbl@aQLcorn>; Gerardo Interiano<in
flQ@m aiLc.Qm>
Subject: Nina’s quote
.
MALDEF reaction
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund was not impressed.
“The Solomons-Seliger map does not increase the number of Latino-opportunity congressional districts despite the fact
that 65 percent of the state’s growth over the past decade was comprised of Latinos,” said Nina Perales, MALDEF’s vice
president for litigation. “Instead, the map gerrymanders more than 9 million Latinos in Texas to make sure that we have no
more electoral opportunity than we did in 1991.”
Read
more: http:I/www.chron.com!displstory.mpl/metropolitan/7589548.html?utm_sourcefeedburner&utm_mediumfe
ed&utm_campaignFeed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fpolitics+%28chron.com+-+Politics%29#ixzzlNzXP7pWC
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 43 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re:.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 44 of 81
Iamarsmith2l©gmail.com
Wednesday, June 01, 2011 7:44 AM
Gerardo Interiano; Eric Opiela
Jennifer Brown
Re:
Great. Tks.
Original Message
From: Gerardo Interiano
To: 1amarsmith21gmail.com
To: Eric Opiela
Cc: Jennifer Brown
Subject: RE:
Sent: Jun 1, 2011 8:19 AM
They’re wrong. Here is his numbers. Total Hispanic Pop., he goes from 66.4 to 67.5.
from 62.8 to 63.7. SSVR from 52.6 to 53.2
Original Message
From: lamarsmith21gniail .com Fmailto: lamarsmith21gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Eric Opiela; Gerardo Interiano
Cc: Jennifer Brown
Subject:
Just read in todays natl journal that quico drops from 66 to 63 hisp pop.
Hope not true or dangerous.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
HVAP
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 45 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
Fwd: RE: Fw:
msg
1
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
4
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 46 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Wednesday, June01, 2011 8:19AM
Gerardo Interiano
jybblb2@aol.com Brown
Fwd: RE: Fw:
Gerardo
Can Tracy, Ryan, or Bonnie call this reporter and get the stats fixed on Quico’s district?
Thanks,
Eric
Begin forwarded message:
From: “Scales, Sally-Shannon” <SallyShannon.Scalesmail. house.gov>
Date: June 1,2011 8:13:47AM CDT
To: “Brown, Jennifer Y.” <Jennifer.Y.Brown(mail.house.gov>,
“lamarsmith2l mail.com” <lamarsmith2l cgmail.com>
Cc: “Eric Opiela” <eopieIaericopieIa.com>
Subject: RE: Fw:
He called earlier about the Barton suit so I have his contact info. His email address is
cjoseph@nationaliournal.com and phone number is (202) 266-7323. I do think it would be best for someone
from the legislature to call him but if you want me to I can do that this morning.
-----Original Message
From: Brown, Jennifer Y.
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 20H 9:08 AM
To: ‘lamarsmith21(1igmail.com’
Cc: ‘Eric Opiela’; Scales, Sally-Shannon
Subject: RE: Fw:
How would you like to handle. Sally Shannon can get us the contact info looks like reporter is Cameron
Joseph. If we get info telephone number and email would you like Sally Shannon or Eric to call. They might
ask a lot of questions and not sure if they will give us their source or would it be better for Gerardo or his press
team to call since he is part of the team that did consensus map. Seems that might be best.
Jennifer Young Brown
Chief of Staff
Congressman Lamar Smith
2409 Rayburn H.O.B
202 225 4236 phone
202 225 8628 fax
Original Message
From: lam s.m itkI@gm
Lm lltJm tm
@g.m i.Lcmj
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 47 of 81
Sent: Wednesday, June01, 2011 9:03 AM
To: Brown, Jennifer Y.
Subject: Fw:
We need to correct art.
Original Message
From: Gerardo Interiano
To: 1amarsmith21(gmai1.com
To: Eric Opiela
Cc: Jennifer Brown
Subject: RE:
Sent:Junl,20118:19AM
They’re wrong. Here is his numbers. Total Hispanic Pop, he goes from 66.4
to67.5. HVAPfrorn62.8to63.7. SSVRfrom52.6to53.2
Original Message
From: lamarsmit h21gmail.com [m ltl
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Eric Opiela; Gerardo Interiano
Cc: Jennifer Brown
Subject:
arsmih2 igmaiL corn]
Just read in todays nat! journal that quico drops from 66 to 63 hisp pop.
Hope not true or dangerous.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 48 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Fwd: ORVS and other stats
msg
1
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi Ie\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 49 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:50 AM
lamarsmith2l ©gmail.com camp; jybblb2@aol.com Brown
Gerardo Interiano
Fwd: ORVS and other stats
0125 to Current 32 districts Comparison UPDATED May 31 .pdf; Untitled attachment
00194.htm
Begin forwarded message:
From: “Mike Baselice” <mikebcbaseIice.com>
Date: June 1, 2011 8:43:37 AM CDT
To: <qreçounqhilIcgmaiI.com>, “Steve Ruhien” <sruhlen@verizon.net>, “Sylvia Nugent”
<sylrodnugentsbcgIobal. net>, “Dee Buchanan” <deebuchanan@iebhensarling.com>,
“Doug Centilli” <centillibradyforcongress.com>, “Eric Opiela”
<eopielaericopiela.com>, “Gina Santucci” <qina.santucci(qmaiI.com>, “Jenni
Winegarner” <iennimacthornberry.com>
Subject: ORVS and other stats
Summary stats attached for Plan C125. I am not advocating anything by sending this information. This is so everyone is
on the same sheet of music regarding the stats on the districts. Please forward to other GOP members of the
delegation.
MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Rd
Suite 0-2
Austin, TX 78759
512-345-9720 (office)
512-689-4560 (cell)
mikebbaselice, corn
NOTICE AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY: This E-mail, including any attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. 18 U.S.C. 251 0-2521, is
confidential, and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender hereof that you have received this message in
error, and then permanently remove the message and any attachments from your computer, server and all other storage devices.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 50 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
C125 to Current 32 districts Comparison
UPDATED May 3l
pdf
1
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
47.1%
51.7%
44.3%
52.5%
36.0%
53.3%
23
25
2.1%
-6.0%
22
-6.2%
40.4%
52.0%
56.9%
54.4°h
21
58.0%
-2.3%
5.2%
37.0°h
31.5%
64.2%
38.3%
-0.8%
5.5%
60.3%
61.1%
20
42.9%
40.8%
45.4%
13.5%
13.5%
44.6%
44.6%
581%
58.1%
49.3%
TOTAL
0.0%
0.0%
-19.0%
13.9%
0.0%
0.0%
49.3%
46.0%
8.7%
70.3 %
0.0%
-19.1%
0.0%
61.4%
61.0%
44.9%
61.0%
44.9%
0.0%
0.0%
42.033
58.8%
420%
53.833
0.0%
0.0%
34.7%
49.4%
61.4%
0.0%
42.3%
42.3%
0.0%
37.7%
0.0%
0.0%
35
36
37.7%
34.7%
49.4%
0.0%
34
10.8%
0.0%
16.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
594%
0.0%
51.2%
51.7%
51.2%
49.8%
8.3%
16.2%
15.8%
33
11.4%
10.9%
20.5%
11.2%
0.5%
-2.3%
42.9%
43.0%
2.3%
59.4%
58.8%
41.3%
-0.7%
61 8%
56.6%
0.1%
1.9%
17.6%
53.2%
17.4%
53.1%
31
32
-24.1%
-1.1%
-1.6%
0.9%
45.1 %
74.6%
70.7%
35.6%
69.2%
23.0%
77.7%
58.5%
20.2%
23.0%
77.7 %
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.8%
70.3%
46.0%
8.7%
58.5%
20.2 %
0.9%
-16.3%
19.6%
20.4 %
-7.9%
0.5%
18.7 %
36.7%
34.7%
5.2%
23.3%
18.1 %
-4.3%
8.2 %
-18.3%
15.5 %
33.8%
-1.0%
3.0%
10.3%
-3.2%
20.3%
23.5%
2.3%
2.6%
3.9%
13.3%
46.4%
10.7%
42.5%
1.7%
9.7%
20.4%
11.9%
14.9%
1.7%
9.7%
20.4%
9.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
14.9%
11.7%
12.6%
-0.9%
2.7%
5.3%
4.1 %
0.1%
-4.5%
9.2%
2.6%
1.8%
13.7%
8.3 %
9.5%
14.6%
0.9%
4.0%
-0.6%
63.7%
0.3%
-3.1%
-4.5%
3.7%
0.5%
1.8%
0.1%
3.6%
8.0%
23.4%
0.8%
15.4%
14.6%
-62.4°h
21.6%
0.6%
37.9 %
5.7%
-6.0%
0.2%
7.7%
72.3%
-63.5%
81.7%
-0.5%
18.8%
19.3%
62.5%
0.2%
39.7%
62%
9.5%
6.8%
14.0%
-1.1%
51.5%
30.7%
3.1%
69.6%
82.3%
3.6%
13.1 %
3.5%
2.6%
-1.7%
75.7%
52.6%
66.4%
3.6%
323%
35.7%
-2.6%
28.0%
30.6%
29
30
1.7%
1.5%
-0.4%
11.0%
1.9%
2.0%
0.7%
-7.3%
29.5%
33.0%
80.7%
79.8%
20.0 %
-0.5%
5.6%
0.5%
-5.0%
6.1 %
9.3%
11.4%
60.7%
23.2%
0.6%
66.6%
-7.5%
-12.8°h
45.1%
34.7%
4.8%
48.2%
7.1%
-3.9%
49.3%
42.2%
38.6%
27
-11.6%
66.0%
15.8%
-50%
-22.6%
-37.2%
44.1%
62.7%
55.6%
57.9%
117%
40.1%
3.5%
-24.1%
11.1 %
37.0%
7.6%
61.1%
25.0%
20.7%
-2.1%
38.6%
40.7%
2.2%
63.7%
599%
61.5%
2.3%
55.6%
20.4%
17.5%
-14.0%
-15.8%
42.7%
58.5%
-2.8%
-12.3%
53.2%
8.6%
8.1 %
157%
44.5%
13.8%
49.8%
11.4%
23.8%
15.3%
39.1%
43.3%
7.1%
4.3%
62.9%
602%
58.7%
3.3%
24.0%
62.8%
-0.5%
0.6%
15.1%
52.6%
30.9%
48.0%
1.0%
-2.9%
-4.2%
35.6%
50.9%
55.8%
24.9%
-1.3%
21.3%
41.6%
55.1%
51.9%
2.8%
68.0%
-9.7%
49.5%
15.7%
-13.5%
25.5%
18.9%
14.4%
14.6%
0.5%
22.4%
59.2%
5.9%
32%
61 7%
66.5%
63.8%
60.6%
6.2%
-2.1%
44.5%
38.2%
39.0%
29.3%
-3.3%
22.9%
45.2%
-26.0%
18.4%
-57.2%
43.8%
-53.4%
1.7%
1.9%
0.7%
79.1%
29.8%
77.4%
29.1%
17.4%
0.9%
11.1 %
15.1 %
9.2%
69.0%
68.1%
-1.1%
70.1 %
78.7%
79.1 %
-4.6%
13.1 %
18.9%
-2 1%
22.0%
73 6%-0.7%
18.6%
74.3%
-1.9%
50.3%
20.6%
18
19
6.9%
20.2%
20.6%
19.7%
25.6%
-0.3%
3.8 %
13.7%
4.1 %
6.8%
24.6%
-3.7%
-2.7%
-5.5%
28.8%
19.1 %
31.5%
-2.4%
-0.3%
1.0%
-1.4%
37.3%
10.0%
36.3%
-3.2%
35.7%
25.0%
25.3%
38.9%
0.0%
-1.3%
1.4%
-0.6%
7.4%
3.1%
16.1 %
11.4%
8.0%
2.0%
24.5%
13.0%
0.4%
-4.8%
11.4%
22.5%
16.2%
10.0%
13.5%
1.5%
19.6%
21.3%
39.0%
3.5%
-3.0°h
0.5%
-7.3%
Diii.
0.4%
8.6%
10.7%
13.9%
13.9%
18.0%
Air-Amer
VAP
19.4%
11.6%
10.2 %
21.2 %
C125
May31
10.9%
0.5%
7.7%
-6.6%
-1.0%
12.8%
9.7%
17.6%
Air-Amer
VAP
Current
19.4%
10.7%
17.8%
27.2 %
19.5%
4.5%
-2.1%
0.7%
0.7%
-1.2%
10.9 %
12.1 %
-0.7%
Diii.
Hispanic
VAP
17.7%
33.9%
34.7%
C125
May31
Hispanic
VAP
Diii.
71.2%
12.1 %
19.5 %
9.4%
6.9%
14.9%
20.3%
11.1 %
5.6%
3.7%
8.2%
14.3%
3.6%
2010
Spanish
Surname
Current
0.0%
7.5%
42.2%
67.1%
-7.5%
-5.6%
33.7%
56.0%
16
17
C125
May31
11.5%
32.0%
27.4%
2.3%
37.8%
60.6%-1.4%-20.6%-18.2%
-33.5%
-31.3%
68.2%
1.1%
61 1%
35.8%
66.6%
24.0%
-1.1%
32.6%
36.7°h
15
62.0%
424%
34.7%
35.5%
10%
-1.1%
65.3%
67.5%
‘1.4%
38.1%
1.3%
52.9%
54.6%
14
-1.6%
11.5%
52.4%
51.2%
-0.6%
25.3%
26.0%
06%
-2.2%
0.5%
63.9%
63.5%
13
777%
5.4%
42.2%
77.1%
17.7%
28.8%
-0.1%
26.2%
26.3%
36.8%
0 1%
-57%
55.2°h
12
769%
59.9%
-4.1%
51.2%
64.9%
11
76.6%
16.4%
50.5%
0.2%
65.6%
12.1%
21.9%
13.1%
15.9%
50.7%
-53.7%
-0.6%
76.8%
43.3%
77.5%
43.1%
06%
-0.2%
49.9°h
243%
-1.3%
-0.2%
48.6%
64.7%
21.7%
9
59.2%
44.3%
26.8%
1.6%
5.4%
16.2%
48.9%
-52.5%
23.8%
-2.7%
37.3%
29.5%
1.7%
75.7%
73.9%
10
28
9.4%
10.6%
16.0%
27.0%
21.1%
26.1%
2.5%
-1.6%
59.4%
61.6°h
8
7.7%
4.4%
7.5%
29.8%
40.7%
38.9%
23.7%
2.4%
0.5%
64.0%
22.2%
52.7%
7
9.8%
29.2%
20.6%
35.0%
34.2%
23.0%
4.3%
34.8%
34.8%
20.0%
2010
Spanish
Surname
ORVS
minus
oDvs
Current
ORVS
minus
oDvs
C125
May31
Current
59.2%
51.3%
62.7664333
40.1%
43.2%
33.5%
1.4%
-2.6%
63 133
64.5%
52.9%
-2.0%
2.1%
50.8%
54.8%
54.4°h
6
36.1%
34.8%
40.7%
34.2%
659%
69(1%
5
.8%
-4.7%
0.6%
1.6%
36.6%
41.4%
4.4%
46%
-02%
65.8%
59.0%
56.9°h
52.9%
54.9%
57.9%
61.3%
69.2%
2.9%
55.8%
52.9%
3
4
61.4%
0.2%
Diii,
4.1%
-0.9%
-1.6%
2012 eDvs 2012 oD
34.4%
2
26
C’125
May 31
34.2%
Diii.
Current
692%-0.1%
0.3%
59.3%
59.0%
24
C125
May 31
7012 C3RVS 2€ir? ORVS
CurTent
69.2%
Diii.
1
DISTRICT
C125
May31
2006-20111 2006 -2010
Avg GOP Avg GOP
Base
Base
Current
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 51 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 52 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
Re: RE: Fw:
msg
1
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 53 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginterianogmaiI.com]
Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:53 AM
Eric Opiela
jybblb2©aol.com Brown
Re: RE: Fw:
Send me the article so that I can get it to our press team.
I cant find it online.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Eric Opiela <eopielaericopiela.com> wrote:
> Gerardo
> Can Tracy, Ryan, or Bonnie call this reporter and get the stats fixed
> on Quico’s district?
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Scales, Sally-Shannon” <SallyShannon.Scalesalmai1.house.gov>
> Date: June 1, 2011 8:13:47 AM CDT
> To: “Brown, Jennifer Y.” <Jennifer.Y.Brownrnail.house.gov>,
>
lamarsmith21gmail.com’” <lamarsmith2l@gmail. corn>
> Cc: “‘Eric Opiela’” <eopie1aericopiela.com>
> Subject: RE: Fw:
‘
>
> He called earlier about the Barton suit so I have his contact info.
His email address is ciosephfrationalourna1.com and phone number is
> (202) 266-7323.
I do think it would be best for someone from the
> legislature to call him but if you want me to I can do that this morning.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Original Message
From: Brown, Jennifer V.
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:08 AM
To: ‘lamarsmith21gmail.com’
Cc: ‘Eric Opiela’; Scales, Sally-Shannon
Subject: RE: Fw:
>
> How would you like to handle. Sally Shannon can get us the contact
> info looks like reporter is Cameron Joseph.
If we get info telephone
> number and email would you like Sally Shannon or Eric to call. They
> might ask a lot of questions and not sure if they will give us their
> source or would it be better for Gerardo or his press team to call
> since he is part of the team that did consensus map.
Seems that might be best.
>
> Jennifer Young Brown
Chief of Staff
> Congressman Lamar Smith
> 2409 Rayburn H.O.B
> 202 225 4236 phone
> 202 225 8628 fax
>
>
>
>
>
>
Original Message
From: lamarsmith21gmai1.com Fmailto:lamarsmith21gmail.com1
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:03 AM
To: Brown, Jennifer Y.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
>
Filed 08/05/11 Page 54 of 81
Subject: Fw:
>
> We need to correct art.
>
Original Message
> From: Gerardo Interiano
> To: lamarsmith21gmail.com
> To: Eric Opiela
> Cc: Jennifer Brown
> Subject: RE:
> Sent: Jun 1, 2011 8:19 AM
>
> Theyre wrong. Here is his numbers. Total Hispanic Pop, he goes from
> 66.4 to 67.5.
HVAP from 62.8 to 63.7. SSVR from 52.6 to 53.2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Original Message
From: lamarsmith21gmail.com Fmailto:lamarsmith2lgmail.com1
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Eric Opiela; Gerardo Interiano
Cc: Jennifer Brown
Subject:
>
> Just read in todays nati journal that quico drops from 66 to 63 hisp pop.
> Hope not true or dangerous.
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
>
2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 55 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Conservative bloggers promoting Burch
map .msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 56 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 4:34 AM
Gordon Johnson; Denise Davis (home); Gerardo Interiano
lamarsmith21gmail.com camp; jybblb2@aol.com Brown
Conservative bloggers promoting Burch map
TRIBUNE_QA_PhilpottDoggett_on_Redistricting_M IX.mp3; Untitled attachment 00246. htm;
attachment.png; Untitled attachment 00249.htm; doggett_map2jpg_474x1 000_qi 00.jpg;
Untitled attachment 00252.htm
There were the same “Oust Straus” people who produced the SBOE and Pledge Cards video this month.
MP3 of Doggett interview also attached.
EQ
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 57 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
CD 21 Blanco.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 58 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:36 AM
Gerardo Interiano
Ryan Downton; Doug Davis
CD 21 Blanco
Talked to Lamar last night. He’s willing to give up Blanco County to CD 25 (or if you need
it to Conaway to make the San Saba/Mills swap work so you don’t have to split Burnet) to
allow y’all a wider transit through Hays to make it look better, so long as the numbers stay
the same. Just wanted to put that out there as an option for y’all.
Good luck at the hearing today.
EQ
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 59 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
FHename:
CD 8- Woodlands.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 60 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 7:57 PM
Doug Davis; Gerardo Interiano
CD 8- Woodlands
Heads up, I just got a call from Doug Centilli from Cong. Brady’s office. The Woodlands was
removed from CD 8 and put in CD 10 under Plan C130.
Is the best way to fix this for Sen.
Williams to offer an amendment to Plan C130 in committee tomorrow?
E0=
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 61 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
political and hcvap reportsmsg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
gi
Filed 08/05/11 Page 62 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:33 PM
Gerardo Interiano
political and hcvap repor[s
-
could you please get me the political and hcvap reports for c130, if possible tonight? I’m
sending out a delegation update, and would rather provide the RedAppi political data rather
than mine because your numbers are higher due to the way redappi splits vtds (it doesnt take
into account turnout when disaggregating vtd data to the block level). i-F not, that’s fine,
but I’m trying to prevent the grousing about how low cds 10 and 21 are....
thanks
ED
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 63 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
Re: political and hcvap reports.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 64 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginteriano@gmail.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:37 PM
Eric Opiela
Re: political and hcvap reports
won’t be able to get them tonight. I dont have RedAppl here at home and everyone at work is gone.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com> wrote:
gi
could you please get me the political and hcvap reports for c130, if possible tonight? I’m sending out a
delegation update, and would rather provide the RedAppl political data rather than mine because your numbers
are higher due to the way redappl splits vtds (it doesnt take into account turnout when disaggregating vtd data to
the block level), if not, that’s fine, but I’m trying to prevent the grousing about how low cds 10 and 21 are....
thanks
EQ
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 65 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: political and hcvap 1
reports
m
sg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi le\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 66 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:38 PM
Gerardo lnteriano
Re: political and hcvap reports
that’s fine, thanks for trying.
eo
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Gerardo Interiano wrote:
won’t be able to get them tonight. I dont have RedAppl here at home and everyone at work is gone.
On Thu, Jun 2, 20H at 9:33 PM, Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com> wrote:
cr1-
could you please get me the political and hcvap reports for c130, if possible tonight? I’m sending out a
delegation update, and would rather provide the RedAppi political data rather than mine because your numbers
are higher due to the way redappl splits vtds (it doesnt take into account turnout when disaggregating vtd data to
the block level), if not, that’s fine, but I’m trying to prevent the grousing about how low cds 10 and 21 are....
thanks
EO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 67 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
RE: CD 8- Woodlandsmsg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 68 of 81
Ryan Downton_HC [Ryan.Downton_HC©house.state.tx.us]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:19 PM
Gerardo Interiano; Eric Opiela
Doug Davis
RE: CD 8- Woodlands
If it was taken out, it wasnt intentional.
in that area.
But follow up with Doug on one specific request
From: Gerardo Interiano [ginteriano@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:13 PM
To: Eric Opiela
Cc: Doug Davis; Ryan Downton_HC
Subject: Re: CD 8- Woodlands
I just talked to Doug and suggested that he work with Eric to draft an amendment and have one
o-F the Senators offer it in Committee. I think this was an oversight on our part. Ryan let me
know if 1m missing anything.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 2, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Eric Opiela <eopie1aericopie1a.com> wrote:
> Heads up, I just got a call from Doug Centilli from Cong. Bradys office.
The Woodlands
was removed from CD 8 and put in CD 10 under Plan C130.
Is the best way to fix this for Sen.
Williams to offer an amendment to Plan C130 in committee tomorrow?
>
> EO=
1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 69 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Texas State.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:43 PM
Gerardo Interiano
Ryan Downton_HC
Texas State
Did y’all intend to give Texas State University to Lamar?
Filed 08/05/11 Page 70 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 71 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: political and hcvap reports.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fl I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 72 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginteriano@gmail.com]
Friday, June 03, 2011 8:10 AM
Eric Opiela
Re: political and hcvap reports
Cl 30-HCVAP.pdf; Cl 30 Statistics.xls
-
Here you go.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com> wrote:
gi
could you please get me the political and hcvap reports for c130, if possible tonight? I’m sending out a
delegation update, and would rather provide the RedAppl political data rather than mine because your numbers
are higher due to the way redappl splits vtds (it doesnt take into account turnout when disaggregating vtd data to
the block level), if not, that’s fine, but I’m trying to prevent the grousing about how low cds 10 and 21 are....
thanks
EO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 73 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
C130-HCVAP.pdf
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
523.361
508.081
698.488
698,488
(98487
698.488
698488
698,488
698488
698,488
698488
698,487
698488
698,488
698,488
698.488
698488
698,488
698487
698.488
698487
698.488
698488
698,488
698,488
698,488
698487
698,488
(98488
698,488
(98 488
698.488
698487
698,488
.692,488
698,487
692,488
698,488
39.0
257
16.6
328
23.5
288
19.1
20.2
18.9
73,6
79.8
198
33.0
295
61.5
231
21.3
63.7
20.3
156
23.3
444
75.4
i0(
35.6
l)(
20.4
23.0
79.0
57.7
21.8
212
124
27.4
128
9.7
% HVAP
-
)
5
O
8
434,275
455405
391,705
465015
33(1,220
311 710
389.080
417970
446.350
425,420
365.395
393,665
444,815
468.890
403,335
413451
474,035
414021
355,060
403045
422,550
332695
407,225
467430
418,360
467,385
469,200
.312,960
353,964
460630
398.160
464130
421.060
482880
396,475
Citizen yAP
(15.198)
(±5.106):
(±5.400)
(±5,265)
(±5.337)
(15.377)
(+6,535
(+5.104)
(+4D8’)
(±5.454)
(±5 714)
(±4.6(18)
(±5(114)
(±6,173)
(.15315)
(±5.020)
(±5251)
(+5.111)
(±4.933)
(±5,940)
(+5,035)
(+4.896)
(±5931)
(+6,541)
(±5478)
(±6.070)
(±5699)
(+4.996)
(±5,491):
(±4,930)
(+6 181)
(+5,643)
(+6076)
(±4.879)
(1 ‘i6’)
(±5.752)
MOE
5.3
16.7
79
4.9
107
25.0
145
8.7
183
14.4
23!
11.7
14.3
13.0
73.6
74.8
136
18.5
214
57.8
189
16.2
59.2
12.2
106
13.7
403
68.5
543
20.5
120
11.7
13A
71.8
52.0
12.9
% IICVAP
(+0.8%)
(+06 o)
(±0.5%)
(±0 8 o)
(±0.6%)
(±06 )
(±0.5%)
(+0.5%)
(+0.5%)
(3719%)
(±0.6%)
(±65°’)
(±0.6%)
(±06 o)
(±4.8%)
(+05 o)
(±0.6%)
(+0.8%)
(+0.5%)
(±05° )
(+0.6%)
(+07 )
(±0.8%)
(+09
(±0.8%)
(±06 )
(±0.6%)
(+0.6%):
(±0.8%)
(±0.5%)
(±419%)
‘h(164
34,579
365876
376,746
298 147
401,551
395682
368,783
401 .955
414,166
291,127
334,354
369918
353.284
385094
354.159
471 901
381,053
368.043
379,416
426,313
357,713
408+01
342,04!
74( 394
341,472
379 141
391,477
367.714
327,401
333,669
391,751
)
(±050
81
20.3
114
7.1
148
11.2
195
9.4
11.5
11.2
69.3
69.0
110
15.2
279
50.5
143
13.8
53.2
8.6
81
11.1
360
67.!)
I 4
15.4
114
8.3
10.8
72.!
44.8
11.0
10809’
272,982
31( 848
326.889
249788
346.172
343 187
310.355
342.791
352,698
253.602
314,648
30784i
297.168
330554
289.718
391904
333,350
324,549
309,304
35760°
298,888
345039
303,866
215 168
293,614
3144(’
335,919
307.866
290,392
272,457
342.173
81
19.9
119
7.2
146
11.4
198
9.5
11.8
11.2
68.9
68.5
112
14.7
231
50,0
148
13.9
52.8
9.0
84
10.9
3(0
66.0
500
14.8
117
8.3
10.8
71.3
43.7
11.1
14.0
51
3,7
320348
33! 713
360.516
14.1
59
3.7
2010 General Election
Non-Suspense Voter Registration
Total Voter Registt’atioii
Total
%SSVR
%SSVR
Total
351.555
4.4
4.4
404,72!
PLANC13O
366,529
381 924
414,051
-
-
(±414%).
(+0.6%)
(+07 o)
(+0.4%)
MOE
2005-2009 ACS Special Tabulation
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRiCTS
1-lispanic Population Profile
Using Census, American Community Survey, and Voter Registration Data
The American Community Snrvey provided estimated cilizen voling age population (CVAP) data at the hlock group level na Special Tabulation. All block groups with more than 50% 01 lhe population in a district are incltttled in the analysis.
MOO = Mareun of etror at 90% confidence level
I-I VAP Hispanic voting age popitlution / voting age population
% lICVAP Hispanic citizen voting age population I citizen voting age populanon
SSVR = Spanish stirnante voter retistmtion
521,727
lI388
484,757
218945
517.124
498416
511,940
22630
504,836
519.246
523.376
467.289
490.902
32324
517.170
772671
509,364
253 173
499,151
497353
528,185
721 169
496,836
217908
471,910
474 100
490,357
101 455
526.526
504.71.9
480,485
498,374
511,716
109097
VAP
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
.13
14
:15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
‘7
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
2010 Cejisus
District
6:26.20 PM
I oil
13805
Texo.Leglovconncl
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 74 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 75 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
I9lename:
C130
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
FiIe\Straus\DIS
-
Statistics.xls
DOCUMENT INFO
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
.
20
21
26
27
42
i
40
39
37
38
3
3
20
21
22
23
24
25
11
12
11
14
15
16
17
18
10
15
16
17
18
19
698,488
698,488
698,488
698,488
698487
698,488
698488
698,487
698488
698,488
698,488
698.488
698,488
698487
698,488
698.488
698,488
698.487
698,488
698,488
698488
698,488
698488
698,488
6°t 487
698,488
698487
698,488
11.4%
130°
39.5 95
6’ /
7.7%
3.7%
11.6%
3.0%
10315
8.218
9 2 95
5.3 95
4.1 00
135%
46.4%
117
11 9%
149
1.7%
100
9.1 95
3.6%
37.6%
106%
3,8%
137%
5o8/
20,0%
1.6%
‘10.8%
8.7%
196
20.4%
230
79.0%
577
21.8 95
35.605
70.6%
0
60 8 95
30.3%
235%
32.3
496 95
79.2%
8351-8
81.5%
307
32095
375
80.41’s
671
30.7
53.3 %
66.395
21,3%
63.7%
20.3%
15 6%
23 3 00
44.4 95
754%
61.5%
23.1%
18.9%
796%
79.8%
198
33 0 95
9S
57.488
37 8 95
28.995.
{7,5 95
58.214.
55 5 95
563°’o
41.995
39:9%
64 9 95
548%
61.5%
74-7%
59:0%
68:3 95
46.2 95
36.695
21.6%
68.5 95
62.7%
64.6 95
50.2%
68.0
41.2°
57 3 95
61.005
256
38.6%
80,9%
82.9%
325 /
71 $ 95
354
68.5%
26.6%
32.595
202
‘
71.695.
56.1%
32.4%
325%
25.5%
191%
433%.
35-7%
58.798
194%
81.995
649%
81.8%
64.5 %
51.33’s
41,4%
67.3 95
26 0 %
79.4 95
52 1 95
672%
70.6 95
62.9%
68.0%
65.618
68.9%
72.9 95
56 7 %
72.4%
33.7%
25.795
16.6%
39.0%
35.895
235%
13
‘14
698,488
7
8
9
10
‘12
698,488
698,488
6
TT
74)2%
74.3 95
69.21-5
64.2 %
70,0%
80 0 I’S
277%
66 7%
9.7%
21.2%
107%
139%
698,438
698,488
4
5
61.9%
/ lOG R Attorney Geit Abbott
74,7%
71.905
63.7%
64.1 95
58 8 95.
55.6 95
57 9 95.
70.5 95
22.2 95
55 5 95
/ lOG R Gocrnor l’errv
66.1%
39.9%
304.)
-
Plan Stats Report
CONGRESSJNAL STRJCO
/ Black+IIisp’inic Voting Age Population
H
21 1
203%
343%
50 I
36.0%
25 I
I’S -o
86
129%
698,488
698487
2
3
/ tIi’opanic Voting Age Population
14/
274%
G
8
/ Bhck sling Age
178°
F
9
10
lTol’il Population
DE!
698458
District
I
I
1
5
6
7
B
l)aia: 2011) Census; innSusliense YR
JRA.300
A!
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 76 of 81
2
791%
545%
759%
566°o
769%
572%
407%
326%
580%
202%
601%
475%
583°1
530%
5835o
518%
331°o
28491
172%
546%
562°1
616%
5695
559%
597%
587%
384%
339%
176°
551%
•
33
34
35
36
38
536°c
335%
34951
591°1
565%
388%
385°c
694%
40
42
.
31
55500
5590/0
375%
366%
293%
542%
204%
660°1
7
28
26
23
24
22
21
T
18
782%
404°/o
223%
546%
560%
16
69591
504%
694%
731%
601%
13
230°
53400
613%
575%
15
562%
697°o
619%
10
11
12
14
606%
633%
5550
j_z
r
IM
Conim 3
628%
619%
621%
%OSG R RR
9
%08G R PrcsidciitMcCain
6881o
L
8
7
4
.
K
N
—
Txoo [eglol.dho Council
1169)3/li 11:09 AM
0
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 77 of 81
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 78 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: Texas State. msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
Fi I e\Stra us\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 79 of 81
Gerardo Interiano [ginterianogmaiI.com]
Friday, June 03, 2011 8:10 AM
Eric Opiela
Ryan Downton_HC
Re: Texas State
i’ll defer to Ryan.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eric Opiela <eopiela@ericopiela.com> wrote:
Did y’all intend to give Texas State University to Lamar?
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
Filed 08/05/11 Page 80 of 81
DOCUMENT INFO
Filename:
Re: Texas State.msg
FOLDER#:
StrausO726ll\Outlook Data
File\Straus\DIS
DOCUMENT INFO
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 117-5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Filed 08/05/11 Page 81 of 81
Eric Opiela [eopiela@ericopiela.com]
Friday, June 03, 2011 8:11 AM
Gerardo Interiano
Ryan Downton_HC
Re: Texas State
He said no.
On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:10 AIvI, Gerardo Interiano wrote:
i’ll defer to Ryan.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eric Opiela <ç1..c.cp> wrote:
Did y’all intend to give Texas State University to Lamar?