Modelling behaviour using @RISK and PrecisionTree Palisade Risk Conference

advertisement
Modelling behaviour
using @RISK and
PrecisionTree
Why probability estimates aren’t always
what they seem
Palisade Risk Conference
2011
© 2011Captum Capital Limited
Chris Brand
Modelling Behaviour
ƒ The psychology of decision making
ƒ Examples of judgement errors
ƒ How to model human behaviour
2
People Aren’t Perfect
ƒ Humans are not perfectly rational
ƒ Errors in judgement are predictable
ƒ People are often poor at making
probability judgements
3
Modelling Behaviour
ƒ The psychology of decision making
ƒ Examples of judgement errors
ƒ How to model human behaviour
4
The Monty Hall Problem
5
The Game
ƒ Three doors; one hides a
car, the others hide goats
ƒ The host opens a door you
haven’t chosen to reveal a
goat
ƒ Should you stay with your
initial choice, or change your
preferred door?
6
Monty Hall in @Risk
7
The logic of the problem
Swap
Stick
£
0
0
£
0
0
0
£
0
0
£
0
0
0
£
0
0
£
1:3 chance
to win
2:3 chance
to win
8
PrecisionTree Model
9
A Controversial Game
ƒ A newspaper column received several
thousand complaints about this solution
ƒ Experiments show ~80% think there is no
difference between staying or switching
ƒ Even after training in probability, ~70% still
choose the wrong answer
10
Base Rate Neglect
ƒ Another error in probabilistic judgements
ƒ Considerably easier to account for than
the error demonstrated by the Monty Hall
problem
11
Taxi Experiment
ƒ 85% of taxis are yellow, and 15% are black
12
The Problem
ƒ A taxi is involved in a hit and run incident
ƒ A witness testified that the cab involved
was black
ƒ Testing of the witness reveals his vision is
accurate 80% of the time
13
What do you think?
ƒ What is the probability that the witness’
claim is accurate?
14
Witness Testimony Model
15
The Error
ƒ 29% (12% + 17%) chance that witness will
testify that a black cab was responsible
ƒ But this judgement will only be accurate
12% ÷ 29% = 41% of the time
ƒ Most people believe accuracy is >50%,
and many think it to be 80%
ƒ In reality, the witness is only 41% accurate
16
Why is this interesting?
ƒ Judgement and decision making involves
reasoning about probabilities, both explicit
and implicit
ƒ Human behaviour does not follow the laws
of probability, but is somewhat predictable
ƒ Can we model behaviour?
17
Modelling Behaviour
ƒ The psychology of decision making
ƒ Examples of judgement errors
ƒ How to model human behaviour
18
The Probabilistic Turn
ƒ Psychology and cognitive science
increasingly influenced by Bayes’ theorem
ƒ Probabilistic models could be implemented
in Palisades’ Decision Tools Suite
19
The Iowa Gambling Task
20
The Setup
ƒ Deck A is high risk, high reward with a low
chance of loss
ƒ Deck B is high risk, high reward with a
50% chance of a loss
ƒ Deck C is low risk, low reward with a low
chance of loss
ƒ Deck D is low risk, low reward with a 50%
chance of a loss
21
The Goal
ƒ Free to sample from each deck, for a total
of 100 card choices
ƒ The aim of the task is to maximise the
amount of money you possess
22
Standard behaviour
ƒ Most participants will sample from the
various decks, before mainly choosing the
high-risk and high-reward decks – decks A
and B
ƒ After several large losses – by
approximately trial 40 – they will instead
begin to prefer the lower risk decks
23
Some notes…
ƒ Loss aversion; losses are experienced as
more significant than gains of equal value
ƒ All models have some degree of error to
them – especially models of human
behaviour
24
Single trial model
25
A (very) simple model
ƒ Model assumes prior knowledge of card
value distributions
ƒ Recommends deck which most
participants eventually settle for
ƒ Normative model, rather than descriptive
26
Extend model using @Risk
ƒ PrecisionTree alone does not grant
models the flexibility to adequately
account for behaviour
ƒ Using @Risk in conjunction with
PrecisionTree aids matters
27
Possible applications
ƒ Visualisation of theories of decision
making
ƒ Bayesian models
ƒ Management decision making training tool
ƒ Consumer behaviour
28
Summary
ƒ Human behaviour is predictably irrational
ƒ This behaviour can be modelled using
probabilistic decision trees
ƒ Such models may have applications in
teaching and other areas
29
About Captum…
ƒ Formed in 2004
ƒ Transatlantic presence
ƒ Life science sector consulting:
ƒ Business development, valuation, partnering
ƒ MasterClasses:
ƒ Valuation Masterclass attended by over 500
executives in UK and Europe
ƒ Internet virtual communities
ƒ Sensor100
30
Contact
Captum Capital Limited
Chris Brand
e: cmb@captum.com
t: +44 (0) 115 988 6154
m: +44 (0) 7800 829 012
Cumberland House
35 Park Row
Nottingham NG1 6EE
United Kingdom
www.captum.com
31
Download