SPATIAL POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF
KALIMANTAN-SARAWAK-SABAH BORDER AREA
prepared for :
Meeting on Cross Border Trade and Commerce Development
and Spatial Planning Harmonization of Kalimantan-Sarawak-Sabah (KASABA) Border Area
between the Government of Indonesia and State of Sarawak and Sabah
Balikpapan, East Kalimantan, October 14, 2003
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SPATIAL PLANNING
MINISTRY OF SETTLEMENTS AND REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
SPATIAL POLICY AND STRATEGY OF DEVELOPMENT
KALIMANTAN-SERAWAK-SABAH-BORDER AREA
ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
• The Guidelines of State Policy (GBHN)
• Law No. 24/1992, Spatial Use Management
• Law No. 25/2000, National Development Program (Propenas)
• Government Regulation No. 47/1999, National Spatial Plan
The objective, targets and position of
Spatial Structure
Vision :
“The realization of Kalimantan-Serawak-Sabah Border Area as the
advanced, prosperous, secure, and eternal country’s front line in
sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia.”
Mission
Policy and Strategy
Spatial Planning of KASABA Border Area
(Rencana Tata Ruang)
Structure of Spatial Utilization
• Settlement Center System,
Transportation System, Utility Network
Pattern of Spatial Utilization
• Protection Area
• Cultivation Area
KASABA Border Area Development
Action Program
Definition:
Border Area is a specific area which is geographically directly
bordering with neighbor country, and decided by the function of
“Security, Prosperity and Environment Sustainability”
Law No. 24/1992 concerning Spatial Planning:
(explanation of ch. 8 sub-ch. 2, ch. 10 sub-ch. 3 & 4)
Border Area is a strategic area prioritized for national concern based
on strategic criteria (national defense and security):
• Formulation of its spatial plan is coordinated by Minister
• Its management as a part of Provincial Spatial Plan is directed by
Governor
• As a part of District Spatial Plan, it is managed by Bupati/Walikota
Concerning border area strategic function for strengthening national
integration and improving social welfare, and its condition as
specific area
The need of legal aspect for KASABA
Border Area spatial planning,
formulated as Presidential Decree
(Keppres)
Law of Spatial Planning, ch. 23 sub-ch. (2)
•National Spatial Plan (RTRWN)
Specific Area Spatial Plan in the context of national spatial planning is
an integrated part of Provincial Spatial Plan and or District Spatial Plan
stated by Presidential Decree.
Explanation of ch. 23 sub-ch. (2)
Specific Area is a strategic area prioritized for national concern based
on strategic criteria as stated in ch. 10 sub-ch. (3):
Strategic value is decided by activities in the area:
a. Significantly influence its surrounding area development;
b. Importantly affect similar activity and or other activities;
c. Stimulus for improving social welfare and national defense and
security.
VISIT NANGA BADAU
• Outer island or borderline (threaten territory)
• Disparity (economic, infrastructure & facilities, social,
or other aspects)
• Growth center and gate (prosperity and marketing
access)
• Over-exploitation of natural resources and human
resources, environment degradation and illegal logging,
illegal fishing, illegal mining, illegal labor
1. PARLIAMENT DECREE No. IV/MPR/1999: Prioritizing
development in border area by decentralization
principles
2. Draft of Presidential Decree on National Policy and
Strategy of Small Islands Development
3. Executive Meeting, 22 Agustus 2002: border area
development policy:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
“country front line”
security, prosperity, and environment
management of conservation area
selective growth center
coordination with neighbor country
4. Draft of Law on Country Border
5. National Working Group Meeting of National Spatial
Coordination Body 13 – 14 July 2003: Accelerating
border area spatial planning synergized with
neighbor country spatial plan, as basis for sectoral
and local development
No
BORDER AREA
1
NAD/North Sumatera – India/Thailand/Malaysia
2
Riau/Riau Islands (Natuna Islands) – Malaysia/Vietnam/Singapura
3
Kalimantan (West Kalimantan & East Kalimantan) –
Sabah/Sarawak (Malaysia)
4
Belu (East Nusatenggara) – Timor Leste/Australia
5
Alor Islands (East Nusatenggara) – Timor Leste
6
Papua – Papua New Guinea
7
Maluku (Wetar Island, Babar) – Australia/Timor Leste
8
North Maluku/Papua – Palau
9
Sangihe Talaud, Mianggas Islands (North Sulawesi) – Philipina
No
Border Area
Land
(L)
/Sea
(S)
a
b
c
d
1
NAD/North Sumatera – India/Thailand/Malaysia
S

-
-
-
2
Riau/Riau Islands (Natuna Islands) –
Malaysia/Vietnam/Singapura
S




3
Kalimantan (West Kalimantan & East Kalimantan) –
Sabah/Sarawak (Malaysia)
L




4
Belu (East Nusatenggara) – Timor Leste
L




5
Alor Islands (East Nusatenggara) – Timor Leste
S
-

-

6
Papua – Papua New Guinea
L
-



7
Maluku (Wetar Island, Babar) – Australia/Timor Leste
S




8
North Maluku/Papua – Palau
S

-


9
Sangihe Talaud, Mianggas Island (Sulawesi Utara) –
S




Philipina
Notes:
a.
Outer island or borderline (threaten territory)
b.
Disparity (economic, infrastructure & facilities, social, or other aspects)
c.
Growth center and gate (prosperity and marketing access)
d.
Over-exploitation of natural resources and human resources, environment degradation and illegal
logging, illegal fishing, illegal mining, illegal labor
Border Area (KATASTARA)
Appendix of Government Regulation No.47/1997: National Spatial Plan
List of Specific Area: 23 (41 in Review of National Spatial Plan)
2.
Katastara Aceh – India
Katastara Riau – Malaysia/Singapura
Central Indonesia
3.
Katastara KASABA
Eastern Indonesia
4.
Katastara Sangihe Talaud – Phillipine
Katastara Papua – PNG
Katastara Laut Banda – Australia,Timor
Leste
Katastara West Timor – Timor Leste
Katastara Alor Islands – Timor Leste
Katastara North Maluku – Palau
Western Indonesia
1.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
 Indonesia-Malaysia KASABA Border Area covers land border area and sea
border area.
 Spatial Planning of KASABA Border Area is administratively delineated by
26 sub-districts or 8 districts:
 West Kalimantan: 5 districts: Sambas, Bengkayang, Sanggau, Sintang,
Kapuas Hulu; and 15 sub-districts: Paloh, Sajingan Besar, Jagoi
Babang, Siding, Entikong, Sekayam, Ketungau Hulu, Ketungau
Tengah, Empanang, Puring Kencana, Badau, Batang Lupar, Embaloh
Hulu, Putussibau, Kedamin
 East Kalimantan: 3 districts: Kutai Barat, Malinau, Nunukan; and 11
sub-districts: Long Apari, Long Pahangai, Kayan Hulu, Kayan Hilir,
Pujungan, Krayan Selatan, Krayan, Lumbis, Nunukan, Sebatik, Sebuku
 Spatial Planning of KASABA Border Area covers:
1. Spatial Policy of KASABA Border Area Development
2. Spatial Strategy of KASABA Border Area Development
3. Spatial structure and pattern of KASABA Border Area
Main Issues of Land Border Area

Economic disparity compare to neighbor country.

Illegal labor in border towns.

Degradation of conservation area and protection forest (illegal
logging).

Shifting of country border pole.

Lack of customs facility and infrastructures (timber smuggling, illegal
logging and motor vehicles).

Isolation of border area, caused by lack of regional infrastructure
services.
Main Issues of Sea Border Area

Lack of information services for fisherman in border area.

Illegal labor flow and sea stealing.

Lack of cross-border trade monitoring.

Lack of marine resources exploitation controlling.

Lack of exploitation and monitoring of small islands.

Lack of transportation facilities and infrastructures (isolated area and
lack of accessibility).
Formulation Process of KASABA Border Area
Spatial Planning
A. Formulation of Technical Substance, through:

Discussion with provincial government and 5 district
governments of West Kalimantan, with provincial government
and 3 district governments of East Kalimantan.

Discussion with sectoral institution in Jakarta.

Distribution of technical substance to 2 provincial governments
and 8 district governments.
B. Formulation of Presidential Decree Draft:

Discussion with sectoral institution (Working Group II National
Spatial Coordination Body) and local (provincial and district)
government in Jakarta.

Technical Team Meeting of National Spatial Coordination Body.
CHRONOLOGY OF FORMULATION OF KASABA BORDER AREA SPATIAL PLAN
No
Activity
Date
Output
1
Visiting Nanga Badau Cross Border Checking
Post (CBCP) by central government, local
government and local representatives
July 2001
Preliminary assessment of Nanga Badau Border
Area
2
Meeting of West Kalimantan Provincial
Government – Sarawak State Government
2002
Agreement of Nanga Badau gate location, first
stone for Nanga Badau custom building
3
Presentation of Bupati Nunukan at Dep.
Kimpraswil: importance of Kab. Nunukan as its
location directly facing neighbor country
October 2002
Proposing Integrated Economic Development Area
of KASABA Border Area, supported by its spatial
plan and sufficient infrastructure
4
Site visit and discussion with Ministry of
Kunjungan lapangan dan pembahasan
Kawasan Perbatasan dengan Menneg. PPKTI,
beserta rombongan Gub. Kalbar
Mei 2003
Usulan Keppres Badan Pengelola Kawasan
Perbatasan Kalbar – Sarawak
5
Rapat Pokja II BKTRN di Jakarta tentang RTR
Pulau Kalimantan dan Rakeppres Perbatasan
16 Juni 2003
Masukan dan koreksi terhadap Rakeppres tentang
Penataan Ruang Kawasan Perbatasan KASABA
6
Rapat Pra Rakernas BKTRN di Ditjen. Bangda
26 Juni 2003
Masukan dan koreksi terhadap Rakeppres
7
Kunjungan Lapangan Tim Kerjasama
SOSEKMALINDO
30 Juni 2003
Forum Kesepakatan dan perumusan Action Plan
8
Rakernas tentang Penataan Ruang sebagai
landasan untuk memperkuat NKRI di Surabaya
(BKTRN)
14 Juli 2003
Komitmen bersama Pusat – Pemprop/kab: produk
PR perbatasan menjadi pedoman penyelenggaraan
pembangunan kawasan perbatasan
9
Working Group Meeting on Construction and
24 – 25 Juli
Penetapan rencana pertemuan khusus antara
No
Kegiatan
Waktu
Hasil
10
Pembahasan RTR Kawasan Perbatasan
antara Ditjen. Taru dengan Pemda
Kab./Kota Kalbar + Kaltim di Samarinda
4 September 2003
Masukan dan koreksi Rakeppres dan indikasi
program
11
Pertemuan BIMP-EAGA di Davao
10 September 2003
Laporan Working Group pada forum SOM: telah
dipresentasikan Jakstra Kawasan Perbatasan
12
Pembahasan internal di lingkungan Ditjen.
Taru
18 September 2003
Bahan masukan untuk pertemuan Tim Teknis
BKTRN
13
Pembahasan RTR Kawasan Perbatasan
Ditjen. Taru + Ditjen. Pelaksanaan dengan
Pemda Kalbar + Kaltim
19 September 2003
1.
Pertemuan Tim Teknis BKTRN tentang
RTRWN, RTRW Pulau serta Jakstra dan
Rakeppres Kawasan Perbatasan
26 September 2003
14
2.
1.
2.
3.
RTR Kawasan Perbatasan KASABA menjadi
contoh untuk kawasan perbatasan lainnya
Usulan penetapan kawasan pengembangan
dengan prioritas
RTR Kawasan Perbatasan harus disetujui Dep.
dan Gubernur terkait
Peta mengacu pada PP 10/2001
Disesuaikan dengan Renstra Perbatasan (Dep.
Kehutanan)
15
Pertemuan di Menko Perekonomian
tentang Pra Pertemuan Negara RI dengan
Negara Bagian Sarawak-Sabah
3 Oktober 2003
Pertemuan tindak lanjut antar departemen terkait
untuk memberikan tanggapan draf paper dari
Malaysia agar diperoleh persepsi yang sama
16
Konsinyasi Pembahasan RTRWN, RTRW
Pulau, Rakeppres Kawasa Perbatasan
KASABA
13 – 16 Oktober 2003
Draf final naskah sebagai bahan pembahasan di
BKTRN
BACKGROUND
Principles
• Guidelines of State Policy (GBHN 1999-2004) : Border area development priority which follows decentralization and autonomy
principle is one of the regional development policies
• Law no. 24/1992 concerning Spatial Use Management (explanation of Ch. 8 ayat 2 & Ch. 9 ayat 3): Border area is a strategic area
prioritized for national concern based on strategic criteria (national defense and security):
– Formulation of its spatial planning is coordinated by Minister
– Its management as a part of Provincial Spatial Planning is directed by Governor
– As a part of District Spatial Planning, it is managed by Bupati/Walikota
The harmonization of “security” and “prosperity” functions in border areas development is aimed at:
i. supporting the endurance of social economic of the community
ii. increasing opportunity and economic competitiveness of border community
iii. supporting the inspection and security of border area
Spatial policy and strategy of KASABA Border Area development considers two factors:
• Cooperation possibility in security and social economic sectors in order to protect each other’s natural resource and also to prevent
criminality at the border areas
• Politics and security supports in behalf of implementing certain points as country gate and economic growth centers
Principles of border area development according to area functional characteristics:
• to catch up the backwardness from surrounding areas which are more developed or adjusted with the development of the areas that
border with neighbor country;
• to secure the border area from over exploitation of natural resources, by both community and the other countries interests.
THE OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND POSITION OF KASABA BORDER AREA SPATIAL USE MANAGEMENT
The Objectives:

To encourage the integrity of border area development in order to reduce the economic disparity and make the
border area as a country front line;

To accelerate area development through the economic growth center development, and opening the isolated areas
by keeping their environmental preservation and local social culture values;

To encourage the realization of sub-regional economic cooperation by following the harmony between security and
prosperity approach.
The Targets:

The development direction of economic growth center according to its natural resources and market potential and
access to neighbor countries which consider community’s interest and local values are identified and formulated;

The management outlines of conservation forest and protected forest are identified and formulated;

Shifting of country border pole is avoided;

The developing direction and regional infrastructures service network system to open the isolated border area and
to implement the regional infrastructures system with mutual synergy among the neighbor countries are identified;

The cities system with economic, defense, security and environment function, and also development direction of
cross border check point with customs control facility, immigration, and quarantine (CIQ) support are identified;

Spatial policy direction for country’s defense and security is formulated.
The Position:

Border area is a strategic area which is geographically bordering with neighbor country or directly facing
other country and decided as a specific area with its spatial planning is prioritized.

KASABA Border Area covers land border area and sea border area.

The approach of border area development: security and prosperity, harmonized with environment
sustainability principles.

Spatial Planning of KASABA Border Area is administratively delineated by 25 sub-districts or 8 districts.

Spatial Planning of KASABA Border Area consists of:
1. Spatial Policy of KASABA Border Area Development.
2. Spatial Strategy of KASABA Border Area Development
3. Arrangement of spatial structure and pattern.
ROAD NETWORK IN SARAWAK AND WEST KALIMANTAN
THE COVERAGE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF KASABA BORDER AREA
Area Coverage:
• West Kalimantan: 5 districts: Sambas, Bengkayang, Sanggau, Sintang, Kapuas Hulu; and 15 subdistricts: Paloh, Sajingan Besar, Jagoi Babang, Siding, Entikong, Sekayam, Ketungau Hulu, Ketungau
Tengah, Empanang, Puring Kencana, Badau, Batang Lupar, Embaloh Hulu, Putussibau, Kedamin
• East Kalimantan: 3 districts: Kutai Barat, Malinau, Nunukan; and 10 sub-districts: Long Apari, Long
Pahangai, Kayan Hulu, Kayan Hilir, Pujungan, Krayan Selatan, Krayan, Lumbis, Nunukan, Sebatik
Area Characteristics:
Infrastructure and Physical
• Generally, it is remote area with insufficient infrastructure
• There hasn’t been permanent country border line (it could be removed easily)
• Information access is so few (unreachable) and the other hand the information access to neighbor
country’s is relatively better
People (Social and Customs)
•
•
•
•
The people spread is very low (the density is 4-10 people per km2)
Man quality is relatively low (minimum health and education facility) and mortality rate is relatively high
The labor mobility flow and people migration is at high rate
Ethnically, people at the border areas have family relationship with people who live in the neighbor
country
Economy
• Regional economic disparity caused by the difference of currency (Indonesian currency is lower than
Malaysia), which encourage Indonesian products and services selling to neighbor country
• Manufacturing activities has not developed yet
• Economic characteristic and production system are as follows:
- Most of the people are nomadic farmers
- Transaction is carried out with the neighbors by barter trade the crops
- The crops yielded are consumed by family (marginal)
- People depend on the exchange rates of neighbor countries currency that have a great demand
Natural Resources
• Mine, forestry, plantation/agriculture, and fishery
• Natural resource management is relatively out of control, especially illegal forest and conservation area
exploitation
Defense Function
• It is alarming as a hideaway of the peace-disturbing movement group (GPK), smuggling, and criminology
• People are provoked easily by negative things
• It is alarming from outside direct threatens and influences
NANGA BADAU BORDER POLE
MAIN ISSUES OF KASABA BORDER AREA DEVELOPMENT
Land Border Area:
 Economic disparity compare to neighbor country
 Illegal labor flow in border towns
 Degradation of conservation forest area and illegal logging
 Shifting of country border pole
 Lack of customs facility and infrastructure (timber smuggling, illegal logging and motor vehicles)
 Isolation of border area, caused by lack of regional infrastructure service
Sea Border Area:
 Lack of information services for fisherman in border area
 Illegal labor flow and sea crime
 Lack of cross border trade monitoring
 Lack of marine resources exploitation controlling
 Lack of exploitation and monitoring of small islands
 Lack of transportation facilities and infrastructures (isolated area and lack of accessibility)
VISION AND MISSION OF AREA DEVELOPMENT
The Vision:
“The realization of Kalimantan - Serawak-Sabah border area as an advanced, prosperous, secure,
and eternal country’s front line in sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia”
The Missions:
• To do the acceleration of border area development and sub-districts which are straightly bordering with
country border line;
• To improve the access among regions inside the area and between areas with the region out of the area,
and area with the neighbor country;
• To develop and manage the natural resources optimally for the prosperity of local people, national and
local income, by keeping the eternal environment capacity;
• To work out development cooperation and management of protected area, productive area, and
infrastructure among central government, local government, private sector, and also stakeholders among
countries.
Two development stage to achieve the vision:
Stage I
Stage II
: Outlet development
: Regional economic development
Stage I :
Outlet development (international gate) is targeted to optimize opportunities of the existing market in
eight districts through the improvement of “status” Pos Lintas Batas/PLB (cross border post) to be “Pos
Pemeriksaan Lintas Batas (PPLB)” (cross border checking post/point) which is, later on, supported by
adequate infrastructure to optimize trade activity and minimize the damage of environment caused by
illegal timber exploitation around conservation area.
The positive sides:
• requires small amount of investment,
• environment damage (illegal logging) can be minimized,
• it reduces the flow of illegal labor,
• regional trade cooperation with neighbor countries is worked out,
• it doesn’t take market domination for certain commodity
The negative sides:
• the growing economic activity is limited on the trade which has contemporary market sections,
• the existing natural resources can not be exploited optimally,
• job opportunity is limited,
• it requires good customs control support.
Stage II :
Regional economic development is aimed at optimizing the exploitation of regional economic opportunity
in accordance with the natural resources potential in eight districts through determination of economic
growth center with its potential sector. Those economic growth center will build sub-regional economic
cooperation with neighbor country.
The positive sides:
• the growth of economic regional activity, reduce economic disparity with neighbor country;
• existing natural resource is used optimally;
• regional cooperation is built with neighbor country, moreover in developing the same kind potential
sector;
• vacant jobs provided and minimize local labor flow to foreign country (Malaysia);
• opening isolated area.
The negative sides:
• threat of environment destruction caused by weak institution of spatial use management control;
• it takes a large amount of investment;
• threat of social conflict due to labor who come into the growth center;
• it requires sufficient market control (the market network at this moment is still weak).
THE SPATIAL POLICY OF BORDER AREA DEVELOPMENT
The development of KASABA Border Area is carried by balancing the prosperity development approach and
the security approach with the consideration of environmental preservation and several demands as follows:
• To reduce natural resource exploitation that inflicts Indonesia, especially in mining and forestry sectors.
• The need of increasing the Sub-Regional Economy Cooperation such as IMS-GT, AIDA and BIMP-EAGA, not only in
infrastructure development sector but also in other sectors.
• The efforts which have been approved in accelerating the border area development among countries, especially KK Sosek
Malindo, through cross sector and cross funding action.
The phenomenon to be understood:
• Cross border conflicts among countries are more influenced by the weak access heading to outlet/market and economic activity
center in Indonesia territory.
• Improving the level of cross border gate service does not always create positive impact in supporting the regional economic on
border area, yet it will encourage and improve the interaction between the two countries in many sectors, not only in economic
sector. A slow respond in synergizing facility and infrastructure required, will inflict Indonesia more, considering its
backwardness on providing regional economic infrastructure.
• The economic development in border area can not be done on one side only, but it must be done on both sides between the
two bordering countries. Rural-city linkage, among the growth centers, economic service center and people consumption are
need to be formulated by building development cooperation comprehensively and coordinately among cities in Indonesian and
Malaysian region.
The spatial policy :
• To boost the development of border area as Indonesian “front line” to Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and other surrounding
countries.
• To develop border area based on the harmony of community welfare, security and environmental preservation principle.
• To boost mutual beneficial cooperation among countries, between central and local, between government and
community/private sector.
The spatial strategy :
•
The development of 9 growth center along the border is urged as integrated trade center and
manufacture activity.
•
The main city development in 9 growth center as a center of national activity (PKN = Pusat Kegiatan
Nasional) with customs facility, immigration, quarantine, settlement, and good transportation/
communication.
•
The development of access among main cities with surrounding cities and cross country.
•
The development and processing of natural resources, such as plantation, mining, and forestry, should
be carried out by manufacture process and local people participation so the people would have direct
and bigger additional economic values.
•
Protection improvement of world “tropical forest” conservation (Betung Kehirun National Park and
Kayan Mentarang National Park) and National Conservation area (Natural preserve of Sinjang
Perinsen and Sentarum Lake national Park).
•
Development of area from security function, especially along the country border line which is synergic
with the development and management of natural resources, conservation area, as well as access
improvement.
•
The increase of sub-regional economy cooperation (IMS-GT, BIMP-EAGA and AIDA), including
infrastructure development such as Trans Borneo Highways and Railways; cooperation of
conservation area management and cooperation of security among countries.
SPATIAL PLAN OF KASABA BORDER AREA
The spatial policy and strategy, furthermore, are described in Spatial Plan of KASABA Border Area, which
contained spatial structure and pattern of KASABA Border Area. The spatial structure are components of:
biological environment, non-biological environment, man-made environment, and social environment which
are hierarchically and functionally connected one to another to form spatial structure. The spatial pattern is a
form of various aspects of human resource, natural resource, man-made resource, social, culture, economic,
technology, information, administration, defense and security, conservation function, cultivation, and
environmental esthetics.
THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF KASABA BORDER AREA
Spatial structure is a part of the Kalimantan Island structure, consisted of system of cities, transportation
system and utility network.
• The system of cities covers hierarchy of settlement center which consists of national activity center
(PKN), region activity center (PKW), and local activity center (PKL) that support border area as stipulated
in National Spatial Plan (RTWN).
• Transportation system includes: the land transportation system, the sea transportation system, and the air
transportation system which are coordinated referring to national transportation system.
• Utility network In KASABA border area development is limited only on the effective and efficient basic
water resources to support the development of growth center and cities in the area.
System of Cities in KASABA Border Area
Function of City
District
Sambas
PKN
Temajok – Aruk
PKW
PKL
City in Sarawak/Sabah
Sambas
Liku, Sekura, Sajingan, Saparan, Tanah
Hitam, Sejangkung, Kaliau
Sematan, Biawak, Teluk
Melano
Bengkayang Jagoi Babang
Bengkayang
Jagoi Babang, Seluas, Siding, Sanggau
Ledo, Ledo
Serikin, Padawan, Sitas,
Gobang
Sanggau
Entikong
Sanggau,
Ngabang
Bantan, Balai Karangan, Serimbu, Beduai,
Kembayan, Noyan, Bonti, Sekadau
Tebedu, Bunan Gega
Sintang
Jasa
Sintang
Nanga Bayan, Merakai Panjang, Semareh,
Sungai Buaya, Sei Kelik, Nanga Merakai,
Senaning, Nanga Ketungau
Kranggas Gayau, Batu
Lintang
Kapuas
Hulu
Nanga Badau
Putussibau
Semitau, Nanga Kantuk, Nanga Silat, Puring
Kencana, Banua Martinus, Langau, Lanjak
Lubok Antu
West Kutai
Lasan Tuyan
Sendawar
Tiongohang, Long Pahangai, Long Boh, Ujoh Kapit
Bilang, Long Hubung, Long Iram
Malinau
Malinau
Long Nawang
Long Busang, Sungai Peningang, Apau Ping, Tapak Mega, Long Pasia,
Loreh, Long Ayu, Long Alango, Long
Long Bangah
Pujungan, Pulau Sapi, Data Dian, Long
Berang
Nunukan
Nunukan – Sebatik, Simanggaris,
Long Midang
Long Bawan
Sei Pancang, Labang, Tau Lumbis,
Lembudud, Pa’ Betung, Atap, Mensalong
Ba’ Kelalan, Salilir, Sibua,
Serudong, Tawau
Kuching
LOCAL AGREEMENT
THE SPATIAL PATTERN OF KASABA BORDER AREA
Protection Area
The utilization management of conservation area is a kind of utilization management of protected forest area,
conservation forest area, area around lake/reservoir, and catchments area in KASABA border area. The protection
center, according to the regulated condition and kind of conservations, includes:
a. Protection center area of Sinjang Perinsen Nature Preserve
b. Protection center area of Betung Kerihun National Park
c. Protection center area of Lake Sentarum National Park
d. Protection center area of Kayan Mentarang National Park
Cultivation Area
The cultivation area utilization management is a kind of utilization management area of production forest,
agriculture and plantation, mining, and sea fishery. For other cultivation areas which aren’t mentioned such as
industry area, city and rural settlement area, tourism area, and energy resources area.
The management of cultivation area utilization as a result of the identification is embodied in regulation of potential
economic sector for each economic growth center, which covers:
1. Temajok – Aruk, potential sectors: Sea fishery, plantation, industry, forestry, agriculture, and tourism.
2. Jagoi Babang, potential sectors: plantation, mining, and forestry.
3. Entikong, potential sectors: plantation, industry, and agriculture.
4. Jasa, sektor potensial: plantation, forestry, and mining.
5. Nanga Badau, potential sectors: plantation, forestry, mining and agriculture.
6. Simanggaris, potential sectors: industrial plant forests, forestry, agriculture, and sea fishery.
7. Nunukan – Sebatik, potential sectors: sea fishery and plantation.
8. Long Midang, potential sectors: eco-tourism and trading.
9. Long Apari – Long Pahangai, potential sector: eco-tourism and industrial forestry.
10. Long Nawang, potential sectors: forestry, industrial forestry, tourism
It’s been identified 9 growth center out of Integrated Economic Development Zone and strategic development area.
AREA DEVELOPMENT ACTION PROGRAM
The acceleration of border area development presented by action program in this section needs to be supported
by these following three things :
1. The existences of political will from central and local government, politic institution, private sector, and
community to consider the border area as a whole entity emerges the authorities of planning,
implementing and developing control against province or district/city government in a form of cooperation
among areas or giving assignment for assistance.
2. In implementing border area development, the operational approach needed to make is : comprehensive
approach including production system, prosperity and security approach as a form of development synergy
of whole cross sector in solving existed problems. These approaches are expected to reach targets to
stimulate community production activity, to boost and improve environment quality, and also to improve
development distribution and government service.
3. For development operational aspect, the approaches should be made are: cross role and cross sector
approach covering:
• The roles which are based on the separate function, i.e. role carried out by government, private
sector and community’s participation
• The roles which are based on the cooperation between government and private sector (publicprivate partnership)
• Cooperation role between government and community
• Cooperation role between private sector and community
Action Program of KASABA Border Area Development (I)
Action Program
1.
2.
Development of Growth Center
 Growth Center Determination (5 areas in West
Kalimantan and 4 areas East Kalimantan)
 Growth Center Detailed Planning Arrangement
Priority I
Entikong, Nanga
Badau,
Nunukan –
Sebatik
Conservation Function Improvement of Protected
Area and Conservation Area
 Regulation and Affirmation of Forest Area
 Management Planning Arrangement of National Park and
Wildlife Reserve
3.
Facility Service and Supporting Infrastructure Improvement for
Investment and Production System
 Incentive and Disincentive Formulation
 Investment Permission Structure
4.
Transportation System Arrangement of Traffic
Smooth Flowing Among Countries
 Connected by Trans Borneo Highway
 Connected by Trans Borneo Railways
5.
Determination of Country Gates Agreed by the Two Countries
6.
Service Quality Improvement, Customs Facility, and
Immigration
Entikong,
Nunukan –
Sebatik,
Nangabadu
Priority II
Priority III
Temajok – Aruk,
Simanggaris, Long
Midang, Jagoi
Sentabeng
Long Nawang, Jasa,
Long Apari – Long
Pahangai
TN Kayan
Mentarang,
SM D. Sentarum
TN Betung
Kerihun
CA Sinjang Perinsen
Temajok – Aruk,
Simanggaris, Long
Midang, Jagoi Babang
Long Aparai – Long
Pahangai
Action Program of KASABA Border Area Development (II)
Action Program
7.
Human Resource Quality Improvement
 Free from Illiteracy
 Accommodated & Primary School graduated
 9 years Compulsory Education is fulfilled
8.
Affirmation of Country Area Border Pole
9.
Law Confirmation Support to Carry Out
Development Activity
10.
Increasing Fund Allocation for Border Area
Development
Note :
TN = Taman Nasional (National Park)
CA = Cagar Alam (Nature Preserve)
SM = Suaka Margasatwa (Wildlife Preservation)
Priority I
Priority II
Priority III
PROPINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT
A. Kab. Sambas
1. Kec. Paloh
2. Kec. Sajingan Besar
B. Kab. Bengkayang
3. Kec. Jagoi Babang
4. Kec. Siding
5. Kec. Siding
C. Kab. Sanggau
5. Kec. Entikong
6. Kec. Sekayam
D. Kab. Sintang
7. Kec. Ketungau Hulu
8. Kec. Ketungau Tengah
E. Kab. Kapuas Hulu
9. Kec. Empanang
10. Kec. Puring Kencana
11. Kec. Badau
12. Kec. Batang Lupar
13. Kec. Embaloh Hulu
14. Kec. Putussibau
15. Kec. Kedamin
PROPINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR
F. Kab. Kutai Barat
16. Kec. Long Apari
17. Kec. Long Pahangai
G. Kab. Malinau
18. Kec. Kayan Hulu
19. Kec. Kayan Hilir
20. Kec. Pujungan
H. Kab. Nunukan
21. Kec. Krayan
22. Kec. Lumbis
23. Kec. Nunukan
24. Kec. Sebatik
25. Kec.
KrayanSel.
Selatan
26. Kec.
Krayan