March 2 Minutes - University of Alaska System

advertisement
JHCC Meeting, Anchorage Alaska
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
JHCC Acting Chair Tim Powers called the meeting to order.
Attendance was taken; there was a quorum for the meeting, with 10 members in attendance.
Present:
Union: Kate Gordon(UNAC), Melanie Arthur (UNAC Alternate)
Colin Clausson (6070), J. Sowell (6070), Jennifer Madson (6070 Alternate)
Gail Opalinski (UAFT Alternate), Tim Powers (UAFT), Jane Weber (UAFT)
Management: Beth Behner, Stuart Roberts, Wendy Tisland (Alternate)
Staff Alliance: Gwenna Richardson, Lisa Sporleder (Alternate)
Staff: Erika Van Flein, Cyndee West
Absent:
Richard Siefert (UNAC),
Mike Humphrey
Guest: Tod Chambers, Michelle Pope, David Hinckley, Greg Alperstein,
The JHCC reviewed the issues determined on March 1. The JHCC has recommended delaying
the implementation of the tobacco surcharge, keeping employee charges the same in FY12 as
they have been in FY11, and conducting a positive enrollment for FY, so that employees must
affirmatively select a plan or be enrolled in the “750 Plan” along with their eligible dependents
from FY11.
The meeting commenced, continuing the agenda approved on March 1, 2011.
Communication topics were discussed. Details of positive enrollment must be determined.
Planning is needed for open enrollment. While UA does not typically hold employee
information sessions until close to the start date of open enrollment, there is a need for earlier
sessions that are more comprehensive this year. Employees need to receive thorough
explanations of the changes to the health plan, and guidance needs to be shared on how they can
prepare for the changes, such as through using a flexible spending account. Changes due to
health care reform will also be explained, such as adding dependents formerly too old to be on
our plan, and the coverage available for treatments that will be considered preventive beginning
July 1. JHCC requested that the SW Benefits staff conduct a sample open enrollment
presentation at the JHCC meeting on 3/16. Various meetings are already being scheduled by the
MAUs for on-site or distance delivered health care presentations for open enrollment purposes.
JHCC members asked that the UA Benefits website be kept current. It was noted that it takes too
long to update the names of JHCC members, and that some earlier documents need to be updated
now that the names of our new plans have now been determined, e.g. the “500 Plan” and the
“750 Plan.” The group discussed other websites, such as those maintained by the unions, which
1
JHCC Meeting, Anchorage Alaska
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
could post links to the SW Benefits web page.
The dates of Open Enrollment this year will be April 15 through May 16, 2011, for changes that
will go into effect July 1, 2011 (FY12).
Erika VanFlein stated that she will work on updating the Plan document. Now that the
committee has made recommendations, the Administration will be able to finalize the plan
details, which will include the employee charges. Erika noted that Caremark does targeted
mailings regarding changes to pharmacy coverage to particular employees who will be affected.
JHCC members asked that a glossary of health care terms and acronyms be posted on the UA
Benefits website, so that employees will have a better understanding of terms and of the issues
that affect them. Scenarios of how family members could meet the required family deductible
could be provided, to make issues like this less confusing. Tobacco cessation program
information needs to be disseminated widely, along with the rules on how long a person must be
tobacco free in order to avoid the charge in FY13. JHCC members brought up other issues that
they found confusing, such as how Alere determines that an employee or dependent is eligible
for the disease management program. Tim Powers was informed that 2 emergency room visits
were required before an individual with high blood pressure would be considered eligible for
UA’s disease management program run by Alere as our vendor.
Cyndee suggested that JHCC prepare a communication regarding its recommendations at the
March 1-2 meetings and that the committee make it a positive message, emphasizing the reasons
for the recommendations made.
Following a break, the JHCC discussed the role of JHCC members during open enrollment
meetings. The consensus was that it would be valuable for JHCC members to attend these
meetings, to share their points of view and to be available to receive input from employees who
attend.
A JHCC member asked whether JHCC meetings were open to the public. Jenn Madsen
responded yes, during presentations. But for deliberation and voting processes, the meetings are
attended by JHCC members only.
A question was asked whether the Staff Health Care Committee (SHCC) would go away if the
union tentative agreements are ratified. Currently, UA and UNAC have a tentative agreement
that specifically references membership on JHCC by two staff members appointed by Staff
Alliance. A general discussion occurred on the pros and cons of having two parallel committees.
The SHCC is a representative group that offers communication, input, discussion and education
of staff regarding health care issues. Currently, SHCC makes recommendations to UA’s
administration, but perhaps this committee could make its recommendations to Staff Alliance.
Lisa Sporleder noted that SHCC hasn’t met with Lockton or been involved in employee rate
setting. Before SHCC was created, Staff Alliance made recommendations directly to the UA
administration. Stuart Roberts noted that the JHCC makes recommendations for all employees
2
JHCC Meeting, Anchorage Alaska
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
of the University, whereas the SHCC provides input from a broad group of staff employees
across the system. Both committees advise the university on health care issues, from their
perspectives. JHCC members questioned whether the existence of a separate Staff Health Care
Committee making recommendations diluted the recommendations of the JHCC, which will now
have formal representatives from Staff Alliance. Lisa and Gwenna agreed to discuss with Staff
Alliance whether having 2 formal seats on JHCC would allow sufficient input for staff at JHCC
that any staff recommendations could be raised at JHCC meetings for consideration, to better
dovetail the committee processes.
Update on Dependent Audit
Erika gave an update on the dependent audit. We are now at a 77% response rate. 1554
employees with dependents have “complete status,” meaning that all of their documents have
been verified and are found acceptable to show eligibility. An additional 99 employees have
incomplete status. 546 employees have documents being reviewed. There are 657 employees
with listed dependents who have not responded to the audit. There have been 12 self disclosed
ineligible dependents, who are being removed from coverage. Beth Behner explained that any
dependents who are found ineligible by ConSova will be separately reviews by SWHR before
any dependents are involuntarily taken off of the plan. The University will make the decision on
removal from the plan, not the vendor. March 31, 2011 would be the earliest date for retroactive
removal from the plan for any dependents who are determined ineligible by UA at the conclusion
of the process. ConSova usually has a sequence of allowing an appeal after the initial
determination of ineligibility and removal of dependents from the plan, so that employees realize
the importance of complying with the audit and providing necessary documents. The appeal
process is not a different type of review process. Dependents are then retroactively reinstated if
documents are submitted that demonstrate eligibility. This process will be modified for the UA
dependent audit, so that UA makes the final determination of eligibility at the end of the process
before any dependents are removed.
Melanie Arthur asked a question from a faculty member concerning ConSova’s credentials for
conducting an internal audit. Beth explained that the university considers ConSova fully
qualified to review and verify eligibility of dependents. UA has received similar questions and
has explained that UA is not granting exceptions to employees who wish to object to ConSova’s
qualifications or object to participating in the audit for other reasons. All employees with
dependents must participate in the audit if they wish to keep their dependents on the plan. Beth
indicated that any employees who write to the University stating that they are not responding due
to an objection to the process will receive a response letter from the University.
Some employees have asked ConSova to provide them a copy of an “SAS 70” report. This is a
type of audit report that firms such as ConSova receive from an independent audit company
concerning their procedures and security safeguards. Beth requested a copy of this audit report
on ConSova from Lockton and the University will review its contents. Another question has
come up regarding the destruction of digital documents. This question has been covered by
CITO Steve Smith’s memo, which is posted on the UA Benefits website and confirms the
appropriateness of security safeguards in ConSova’s process and electronic transmissions.
3
JHCC Meeting, Anchorage Alaska
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Following a lunch break, the JHCC meeting resumed.
The group discussed the motion made by Rich Seifert, that was tabled in the meeting the day
before. Jenn Madsen stated that employers who are self insured may pool their group with
others. Some network savings and economies of scale might be achieved. However, it is her
understanding that we’d then have to buy an insurance policy to provide health care. We would
need to be careful that we did not take in other groups with more risk than our own population.
Stuart recommended that Mike Humphrey contact the State of Alaska and ask them whether they
have considered this type of pooling approach, and whether they could share information with
UA on the SOA claims costs.
The JHCC discussed the presentations by vendors, to receive information on issues of interest.
For example, WIN has not updated JHCC on how their new weight program has been going.
Also, since we are implementing Best Docs, we may want to invite that vendor in to discuss
implementation, communications and employee referrals.
$300,000 Wellness Incentive Funds
Wendy Tisland had distributed a draft form to all JHCC members, that could be used to inform
employee groups how to apply for funds for various wellness incentives and challenges. A
subcommittee of the JHCC, composed of Wendy, Cyndee West and Gwenna Richardson, has
been meeting to pursue the funding of incentive efforts that campuses, departments and various
employee groups apply to sponsor. They have proposed conducting a pilot process for extended
sites to see how this would work. To get the word out on this pilot, Gwenna will communicate
with staff, Cyndee will communicate with the unions, and Wendy will communicate with
management employees. The subcommittee will review and approve applications. A limit of
$500 per person will be enforced. Michelle Pope noted that any events and incentive offerings
must be completed before the end of the fiscal year, in order to use FY11 funds. Processing time
must be allowed.
Kate moved to give authority to the subcommittee to finalize the form so that there can be a pilot
at the extended sites implemented as soon as possible.
Jenn seconded.
Motion carried.
The JHCC again discussed planning for communications and meetings related to open
enrollment and health care plan changes. JHCC members who noted their willingness to
participate in employee meetings included Lisa, Tim, Gwenna, Kate and Melanie. UA will
prepare drafts of open enrollment communications and send them to JHCC for review and
comment. Erika will work on revisions to the current drafts Lockton has been working on, and
will share them with JHCC members.
4
JHCC Meeting, Anchorage Alaska
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
The JHCC Meeting dates are set for the next few months. The time of the meetings will be
10AM to Noon on March 16, April 20, May 18, Jun 15, Jul 20.
Beth moved to adjourn.
Kate seconded.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at
p.m.
Submitted by:
_______________________
Beth E. Behner
_______________________
Date
5
Download