College of Engineering - Worcester Polytechnic Institute

advertisement

A New Approach to Mechanics of Materials:

An Introductory Course with Integration of

Theory, Analysis, Verification and Design

Hartley T. Grandin, Jr.

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Joseph J. Rencis

University of Arkansas

Mechanical Engineering

Session

2006 New England Section American Society of

Engineering Education Conference

March 18, 2006

Outline

1. Theory

2. Analysis

3. Verification

4. Design

5. Examples

6. Conclusion

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Theory

Typical of a One Semester Course

Topics

1. Planar Equilibrium Analysis of a Rigid Body

2. Stress

3. Strain

4. Material Properties and Hooke’s Law

5. Centric Axial Tension and Compression

6. Torsion

7. Bending

8. Combined Analysis

9. Static Failure Theories

10. Columns

• Commonly Found in Textbooks

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Analysis

Structured Problem Solving Format

1.

2.

3.

Model

Free-Body Diagrams

Equilibrium Equations

Blue Steps for Statics

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Material Law Formulas

Compatibility and Boundary Conditions

Complementary and Supporting Formulas

Solve

Verification

Textbooks

• Headings to Solve Problem Commonly Used

Craig – Closest to us! But does not use structured format.

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Analysis ‘Continued’

7. Solve a) b)

Traditional

F x w/ Values and/or

0 ; R

A

R

A

P

B

P

C

P

C

P

B

Unknown

Knowns

Symbolic

Ours

R

A

P

B

P

C

Do Not Isolate Known and Unknown Variables

No Algebraic Manipulation – Reduces Errors!

Engineering Tool – Student Choice c)

No Textbook Does This!

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Verification

Question and Test to Verify the “Answers”

+ =

• w(0) Suggested Questions

A A Hand Calculation?

Comparison w/ a Known Problem Solution?

x

Examination of Limiting Cases w/ Known Solutions?

Examination of Obvious Known Solutions?

Your Best Judgment?

Comparison w/ Experimentation? – Not done in course.

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

L w(L)

B

X

Verification ‘Continued’

Important Educational Elements

– Reflex Suspicion of Program Results

– Check Results with Alternative Methods

• Expected of Professionals

• Expect Student to be Professional

• Textbook by Craig

– Intuitive Discussion for One Solution

– No Numerical Testing

– We Do Both Since We Use Engineering Tools! Allows for

Multiple Calculations Easily.

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Design

• Design is Where you Search for Optimum Solution

– Interchanging Role of Known & Unknown Variables

• ABET Criteria 3c & Criteria 4 (now in 3c)

• Textbooks – Homework & Computer

– Traditional

• Typically Single Solution for a Single Set of Specific

Requirements

– Ours

• Multiple Solution for Any Set of Requirements

• Easily Change Known & Unknown Variables

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Example 1: Statically Determinate

Axially Loaded Bar

Determine the displacement at B and C. y d

1

L

1

L

2 d

2

(1) (2)

P

B

P

C

A B

C

Solve using the given specifications:

• P

• L

B

• d

1

• E

1

1

= - 18.0 kN

= 0.508 m

= 40 mm

= 207 GPa: Steel

• P

• L

• d

2

C

• E

2

2

= 6.0 kN

= 0.635 m

= 30 mm

= 69 GPa: Aluminum

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

1. Model

• Problem Defined & Figure Labeled

Symbolically

• Identify Loading Model

– Axial, Torsion and/or Transverse

• State Assumptions

• Define Coordinate Set y d

1

L

1

L

2 d

2

A

(1) (2)

B

P

B

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

C

P

C

X

2. Free-Body Diagrams

• Complete and/or Parts of Structure

Assumed Deformation y u

B u

C

L

1

L

2

(b)

(c)

R

A

(d)

(1) (2)

B

P

B

C

P

C

A

A

(1)

FBD I

B

F

(1)

B

F B

P

B

(2)

FBD II

B

C

Very Thin IMAGINARY slice shown for clarity of solution only.

P

C

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference x

3. Equilibrium Equations

• Symbolic Equations

• Check Dimensional Homogeneity

• Do Not Isolate Unknowns

– Reduces Algebraic Error!

y

L

1

(b)

FBD

FBD

I :

II :

( 1 )

F

F

B

( 1 )

B

R

A

P

B

P

C

(c)

( 1 )

( 2 )

R

A

A

A

Assumed Deformation u

B

L

2 u

C x

(1) (2)

C

P

C

B

(1)

FBD I

B

F

(1)

B

(1)

F

B

F

(1)

B

(2)

FBD II

P

C

B

C

Very Thin IMAGINARY slice shown for clarity of solution only.

x

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

4. Compatibility and

Boundary Conditions

• Symbolic Equations

• Do Not Isolate Unknowns

– Reduces Algebraic Error!

• Done for Statically

– Determinate (Not Common) and

– Indeterminate Problems

Treat Both

Problems the

Same Way!

• Done for Both Problems in Textbooks by

– Craig

– Crandall, Dahl, Lardner

– Shames

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

4. Compatibility and Boundary

Conditions ‘Continued’

• Compatibility

– Displacement at Identical Points of Segment Equal

• Boundary Condition

– u

A

= 0 for Rigid Support

Assumed Deformation

(a) x y u

B u

C

L

1

L

2

(b)

(1) (2)

B

P

B

C

P

C

A

(c)

R

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

A

FBD I

B

(d)

F

(1)

B

B

P

B

(2)

FBD II C

Very Thin IMAGINARY slice shown for clarity of solution only.

P

C x

5. Material Law Formulas

• Symbolic Equations

• Do Not Isolate Unknowns – Reduces Error!

(a)

(b)

• Check Dimensional Homogeneity x y

L u a u(x) u b y F a u

B u

C F b

x

L

1 a L

2 b

A, E Constant

A

(1)

B

P

B u b

 u a

C

F b

L

P

AE x

R

A

(c) (1)

F

(1)

B

(d)

A FBD I

F B

B

P

B

(2)

FBD II

P

C

B

C

Very Thin IMAGINARY slice shown for clarity of solution only.

Segment

Segment

( 1 ) :

( 2 ) : u

B u

C

 u

A

F

B

( 1 )

L

1

 u

B

A

1

E

1

P

C

L

2

A

2

E

2

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

( 3 )

( 4 )

6. Complementary and

Supporting Formulas

• Complementary Formulas

– Stress, Strain, Stiffness, etc.

• Supporting Formulas

– Cross-sectional Area

– Polar Moment of Inertia

– Centroid Location

– Moment of Inertia, etc.

A

1

 d

1

2

4

( i ) A

2

 d

2

2

4

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

( ii )

7. Solve

• # Independent Equations = 4

• # Unknowns = 4

– R

A

F

B

( 1 )

B

• Solution by and u

C

FBD

FBD

Segment

Segment

I :

II :

( 1 ) :

( 2 ) :

( 1 )

F

F

B

( 1 )

B

R

A

P

B

P

C u

B

 u

A

F

B

( 1 )

L

1 u

C

 u

B

A

1

E

1

P

C

L

2

A

2

E

2

– Hand – Requires Algebraic Manipulation

• Coupled Equations – Indeterminate

• Nonlinear Equations

– Engineering Tool

• ABET Criteria 3k

• Not Found in Textbooks

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

( 1 )

( 2 )

( 3 )

( 4 )

8. Verification

• Comments

– May not Yield Absolute Proof

– Does Improve the Level of Confidence

• Step 7. Solves Problem Once

Step 8. Solves Problem Multiple Times

Need Engineering Tool!

• Compare to

– Hand Solution

– Similar Problems in other Texts

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

8. Verification ‘Continued’

• Uniform, Homogenous w/ P

B u

C

P

C

( L

1

L

2

) AE

• Uniform, Homogenous w/ P

C u

C

 u

B

P

B

L

1

A

1

E

1

= 0

= 0 y

• E

1

– u

B

∞ Yields

= 0

• E

2 u

C

P

C

( L

2

) A

2

E

2

 ∞ Yields u

B

= u

C

= ( P

B

A

P

C

)( L

1

)

• E

1 u

B

• P

B

 ∞ and E

2

= u

C

= 0

= - P

C

Yields u

B

∞ Yields

= 0 & u

C

P

C

( L

2

)

L

1

(1)

A

1

E

1

A

2

E

2

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

L

2

B

P

B

(2)

C

P

C

Example 2: Statically Indeterminate

Axially Loaded Bar

• All Equations the Same as Example 1

• Determinate Problem – Example 1

– P

C

– u

C

= Known

= Unknown

L

1

L

2

(1)

B

P

B

(2)

• Indeterminate Problem – Example 2

– P

C

– u

C

= Unknown

= Known = 0

– Only Requires Changing

Known and Unknown

A y

L

1

A

(1)

P

B

B

L

2

(2)

C

C

P

C x

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Example 3: Design Application of Example 2

y

• Find d

2

-20 μm to limit u

B to

• Solution Alternative 1

– Iterate Input d

2

– Solve u

B

• Solution Alternative 2

– Plot d

2 versus u

B

• Solution Alternative 3

– u

B

= - 20 μm (Known)

– d

2

= Unknown

L

1

L

2

A

(1)

P

B

B

(2) d

2

=?

C

Commonly Found in

Textbooks

• Coupled

• Non-linear Solution

• No Intermediate Analyses x

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Conclusion

Integrated Approach

Theory

Analysis

Structured Problem Solving Format

Symbolic Equations

Solution by Engineering Tool

Verification

Hand Solution

Known Solution

Limiting Cases

Design

Change Known and Unknown Variables

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

What do you think?

Joe Rencis

Department of Mechanical Engineering

University of Arkansas

V-mail: 479-575-3153

FAX: 479-575-6982

E-mail: jjrencis@uark.edu

2006 ASEE NE Section Conference

Download