CHAPTER
18
© 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning
Bank
Regulation
Chapter Objectives
Describe the key regulations imposed on
commercial banks
Explain development of bank regulation over
time
Evaluate the areas of bank regulation
Describe the main provisions of the Financial
Services Modernization Act of 1999
Background
Banking industry has experienced tremendous
change in recent years
Post-Depression legislation focused on safety and
soundness of commercial banks
Deregulation of financial services industry
Intense competition/consolidation
Expansion--economies of scale
Why Banks Are Regulated?
Deposits are 70% of money supply
Center of payments mechanism
Primary transmitter of monetary policy
Major liquidity provider to economy
Make loans
Deposits are liquid assets of customers
Liabilities are major, low risk assets of
consumers
3
Regulatory Structure
The regulatory structure of the banking system
in the U.S. is unique
Dual banking system: Federal and State
Charter
State
charter = state bank
Regulated by state banking agency
Federal charter = national bank
Regulated by Comptroller of the Currency
Regulatory Structure
Banks that are members of the Federal
Reserve are also regulated by the Fed
Banks that are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation are also regulated by
the FDIC
Regulatory overlap:
FDIC
Federal Reserve System
State banking authorities
Now Securities and Exchange Commission--stock
Regulatory Structure
Regulation of bank ownership
Bank independently owned
Bank owned by a holding company
Popularity
stems from amendments to the Bank Holding
Company Act in 1970
Allowed BHC’s more flexibility to participate in
activities like leasing, mortgage banking, and data
processing, and later,
Insurance, securities underwriting, etc.
Deregulation Act of 1980
Initiated to reduce bank regulations and increase
Fed monetary policy effectiveness
Also known as DIDMCA
Phase out of deposit rate ceilings
Interest rate ceilings were previously enforced by
Regulation Q. Phased out by 1986
The act allowed banks to make their own decisions
on what interest rates to offer on deposits
Allowance of checkable deposits for all
depository institutions
NOW accounts
Deregulation Act of 1980
New lending flexibility for depository
institutions
Explicit pricing of Fed services
Allowed S&Ls to offer limited commercial and
consumer loans
Ensures the Fed only provides services, such as check
clearing, that it can provide efficiently
Impact of the DIDMCA
Consumers shift to NOW accounts and CDs, so banks
now pay more for funds than before. Also, increased
competition between depository institutions
Garn-St. Germain Act, 1982
Came at a time when some depository institutions
were experiencing severe financial problems
Permitted depository institutions to offer money
market deposit accounts to compete with money
market mutual funds
Also allowed depository institutions to acquire
failing institutions across geographic boundaries
In general, consumers appear to have benefited from
deregulation
Regulation of Deposit Insurance
Deposit insurance began in 1933 with creation
of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in
response to bank runs/failures in 1920s
(agricultural) and early 1930’s (Depression)
Between 1930-1932 20% of banks failed.
Initial wave of failures resulted in runs on other
banks, some of which were healthy
The amount of deposits insured per person has
increased from $2,500 in 1933 to $100,000 today
Regulation of Deposit Insurance
The pool of funds used to cover insured
depositors is called the Bank Insurance Fund
Supported by annual insurance premiums paid by
commercial banks
Until 1991, the rate was the same for all banks,
regardless of risk, causing moral hazard problem
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDICA) of 1991
phased in risk-based insurance premiums
Regulation of Capital
Banks are required to maintain a minimum
amount of capital as a percentage of total
assets
Banks prefer low capital ratios to boost ROE
Regulators prefer higher levels to absorb operating
losses
In the 1988 Basel Accord central bankers of 12
countries agreed to uniform, risk-based capital
requirements
Regulation of Capital
Use of the Value-at-Risk method to determine
capital requirements
In 1998, large banks with substantial trading
businesses began using their own internal
measures of market risk to adjust their capital
requirements.
Use a VAR (value-at-risk) model, usually with a
99 percent confidence interval
Precursor to 1991 risk-based capital
requirements
Regulation of Capital
Testing the validity of a bank’s VAR
Uses backtests with actual daily trading gains or
losses
If the VAR is estimated properly, only 1 percent of
the actual trading days should show results worse
than the estimated VAR
Related stress tests
Bank identifies a possible extreme event to
estimate potential losses
Regulation of Operations
Regulation of loans
Regulators monitor:
Loan
quality
Loan diversification geographically and by industry
Adequacy of loan loss reserves
Exposure to debt of foreign countries
Regulation of investment securities
Non-equity, investment grade investments
Provides income and liquidity to bank
Investment banking activity only in state and
municipal bonds
Regulation of Operations
Regulation of securities services
Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall) separated
banking and securities services
Intended to prevent conflicts of interest and selfinterest lending
Deregulation of corporate debt underwriting
services, 1989
Commercial paper and corporate debt securities
Still no common stock underwriting
Regulation of Operations
The Financial Services Modernization Act,
1999
Essentially
repealed the Glass-Steagall Act
Enables commercial banks to more easily pursue stock
underwriting and insurance activities
Deregulation of brokerage services
In
the late 1990s some banks acquired financial
services firms.
Citicorp and Traveler’s Insurance Group, which owned
Solomon Brothers and Smith Barney, merged
Regulation of Operations
Deregulation of mutual funds services
The
Fed ruled in 1986 to allow brokerage subsidiaries of
bank holding companies to sell mutual funds
Regulation of Operations
Regulation of insurance services
Banks that already participated in insurance before 1971
were grandfathered
Banks sometimes leased space to insurance or served as
agent, but not underwriting insurance
Banks able to underwrite annuities, 1995
The passage of the Financial Services Modernization Act
(1999) confirmed that banks and insurers could
consolidate their operations
Regulation of off-balance sheet transactions
Risk-based capital requirements are higher for banks with
more off-balance sheet activities
Regulation of Interstate Expansion
The McFadden Act of 1927 prevented banks
from establishing branches across state lines.
No interstate bank holding company mergers
(1956)
Intent was to prevent large bank market
control, but limited competition to intrastate
banking
Slow changes in state banking law to permit
interstate banking
Regulation of Interstate Expansion
Interstate Banking Act
Reigle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act of 1994
Eliminated
most restrictions on interstate bank mergers and
allowed commercial banks to open branches nationwide
Allowed interstate bank holding companies to consolidate into
one charter
Reduces costs to consumers and adds convenience—promotes
competition
Banks take advantage of economies of scale
How Regulators Monitor Banks
Regulators examine commercial banks at least
once per year
CAMELS ratings
Capital adequacy
Regulators determine the “adequacy” of capital
More capital allows banks to absorb losses
Asset quality
Credit risk
Portfolio’s composition and exposure to potential
events
How Regulators Monitor Banks
Management
Rates management according to administrative
skills, ability to comply with existing regulations,
and ability to cope with a changing environment.
Very subjective
Earnings
Banks fail when their earnings are consistently
negative
Commonly used ratio: Return on Assets (ROA)
How Regulators Monitor Banks
Liquidity
Extent of reliance on outside sources for funds (discount
window, federal funds)
Sensitivity to interest rate changes and market
conditions
Rating bank characteristics
Each of the CAMEL characteristics is rated on a 1-to-5
scale, with 1 indicating outstanding
Used to identify problem banks
Subjective opinion must be used to supplement objective
measures
How Regulators Monitor Banks
Corrective action by regulators
When a problem bank is identified it is thoroughly
investigated (examined) by regulators
They may require specific corrective action, such
as boosting capital or delay expansion
Regulators have the authority to take legal action
against a bank if they do not comply
How Regulators Monitor Banks
Funding the closure of failing banks
FDIC is responsible for closing failing banks
Liquidating
failed bank's assets
Facilitating acquisition by another bank
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement
Act (FDICIA) of 1991
Regulators
required to act more quickly for
undercapitalized banks
Risk-based deposit insurance premiums
Close failing banks more quickly
Large deposit (>$100,000) customers not protected
The “Too-Big-To-Fail” Issue
Some troubled banks have received
preferential treatment from bank regulators
Continental Illinois Bank
Rescued
by the federal government, while other
troubled banks were not
As one of the country’s largest banks, Continental’s
failure could have reduced public confidence in the
banking system
The “Too-Big-To-Fail” Issue
Argument for government rescue
Because many Continental depositors exceeded
$100,000, failure to protect them could have
caused runs at other large banks
Argument against government rescue
Sends a message that large banks will be protected
from failure
Incentive to take added risks
Removes incentive to make operations more
efficient
The “Too-Big-To-Fail” Issue
Proposals for government rescue
Ideal solution would prevent a run on deposits
while not rewarding poorly performing banks with
a bailout
Regulators should play a greater role in assessing
bank financial conditions over time