Topic #3 Political beliefs and behaviors - Mr. Singh

advertisement

Topic #3

Political beliefs and behaviors

This powerpoint is available at mrsinghcchs.weebly.com/ap-us-governmentreview.html

THEORIES OF GOVERNMENT

• A. Pluralism

• B. Elite and Class Theory

• C. Hyperpluralism

POLITICAL

SOCIALIZATION

The process by which one acquires their political orientation and beliefs

POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION, CONTINUED

• Family

• The most important agent of socialization

• Kids usually end up voting like their parents

• Mostly informal

POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION, CONTINUED

• Mass Media

• The “New” parent

• Elementary school kids spend more time watching T.V. than in school.

• Don’t watch political coverage

• New media – Internet, social media

• Has the growth of media options helped create fragmentation?

POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION, CONTINUED

• School

• In the U.S. public schools promote basic values like loyalty and democracy, not a specific ideology.

• In other political systems, socialization in schools is much more overt.

AMERICAN POLITICAL

CULTURE

Political culture are the beliefs a people have about the role and purpose of government

POLITICAL CULTURE, CONTINUED

• Equality

• Legal – Americans believe in equal treatment under the law and freedom from discrimination

• Sources of legal equality include the 14 th Amendment, legislation such as the Civil Rights Act (1964), the Voting

Rights Act (1965), Title IX

POLITICAL CULTURE, CONTINUED

• Equality, continued

• Political – The right to participate in the political system by running for office, voting, or engage in other forms of political participation

• Political equality has been expanded by the 15 th , 19 th ,

26 th Amendments as well as the Voting Rights Act (1965)

POLITICAL CULTURE, CONTINUED

• Rights

• Freedom of Speech

• Most support in theory, but are often intolerant in practice.

• Fringe groups often targeted – like Communists during the Cold War

POLITICAL CULTURE, CONTINUED

• Rights, continued

• Freedom of Religion

• Increased tolerance during the 20 th century

• Some groups still targeted – Muslims

• Religious Right tends to be intolerant of non-Christian belief.

THE POLITICS OF

VOTING

VOTER TURNOUT

• Comparison to Other Countries

• The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among industrialized democracies.

• Below 50% in 1996, 55% in 2004, and 62% in 2008, 58% in 2012

• Turnout is even lower in midterm elections

• 2010=40%

VOTER TURNOUT

• Reasons for low voter turnout

• Voting is not mandatory.

• Voter fatigue

• Party dealignment

• Weaker parties (less mobilization, etc)

• Declining trust in government

• Increase in minority groups and young voters

• Larger electorate

• NOT ACCEPTABLE – Apathy, cynicism, loss of efficacy

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS THAT

AFFECT VOTER TURNOUT

• Demographics characteristics that can be used to divide a population into smaller groups

• Important demographic factors in the United States that impact voter turnout include:

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS THAT

AFFECT VOTER TURNOUT

• Age

• Older voters have greater turnout.

• Education

• The more educated one is the more likely they are to vote

• Region

• The area of a country someone lives in has no significant impact of voter turnout.

• Income

• The more someone earns, the more likely they are to vote.

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS THAT

AFFECT VOTER TURNOUT

• Gender

• Women are more likely to vote than men.

• Race – BE CAREFUL

• When adjusted for other factors (income, education, etc.) minorities have a higher voter turnout than whites.

• Political Efficacy - Not a demographic characteristic, but citizens with a high political efficacy vote more often.

Political efficacy is the sense that your participation is important and makes a difference.

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

• Considering all elections at all levels of government, which of the following best describes electoral behavior in the United States?

• (A) Primary elections tend to elicit a higher voter turnout than do general elections.

• (B) The majority of the electorate does not vote in most elections.

• (C) Voter turnout plays an insignificant role in election outcomes.

• (D) Adult citizens under the age of 30 tend to have the highest rate of voter turnout.

• (E) Voters with strong party identification vote less regularly than do independents.

HOW PEOPLE VOTE

(LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE)

• Age

• Americans tend to get more conservative as they age

• Education

• Evidence used to show that the more education one had the more liberal they were. Evidence is not at strong today

• Region

• Rural and Southern voters tend to be more conservative; Urban, West coast and Northeasterners tend to be more liberal

• Income

• Working class Americans tend to be more liberal.

HOW PEOPLE VOTE

(LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE)

• Race – Again BE

CAREFUL

• African-Americans and

Latinos tend to vote liberal (Latinos less so).

• Gender

• Women are overwhelmingly liberal

• This is referred to as the gender gap

• Party Identification

• Even though the numbers of party identifiers has decreased it is the best predictor of how someone will vote.

• 2012

• 38% Independent

• 32% Democrat

• 27% Republican

TYPES OF POLITICAL

PARTICIPATION

VOTING

• Voting is the most common form of political participation in the

U.S.

• It is easy to study and quantify.

OTHER FORMS OF POLITICAL

PARTICIPATION

• Litigation • Hold office

• Contact public officials

• Contact the media

• Work on campaigns

• Work on voter registration drives

• Contribute money

• Run for office

• Political discussion

• Join a political organization

• Protest

• NOT Violence

DECLINE OF TRUST AND

CONFIDENCE IN THE

GOVERNMENT

LESS TRUST SINCE THE 1950

S

• Reasons

• Vietnam

• Watergate

• Iran-Contra

• Clinton-Lewinsky

DIVIDED GOVERNMENT

• Divided government

• Since 1968, government institutions have often been controlled by different parties.

• More Partisanship

• Decline of the middle

• Political moderates are starting to be frozen out

• Politicians appeal to the base

• Congress more polarized now than anytime since the

Civil War

• Results

DIVIDED GOVERNMENT,

CONTINUED

• Frustration

• Slows the confirmation process

• Gridlock

ROLE OF MONEY IN POLITICS

• Candidates spend too much time fundraising

• Increased power of interest groups and lobbyists (Abramoff

Scandal)

• Keeps good people from running

• Perception of wasteful spending

CONSEQUENCES OF THE

DECLINE OF TRUST

• More protest

• Decline in voting

• Increase in the number of independents

• Non-partisan community action

• APATHY does not count!

NOMINATIONS AND

CAMPAIGNS

PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES

• Primaries

• More common than caucuses (38/50 states)

• New Hampshire is the 1 st primary

• Primaries weaken party control

• Increase in the number of primaries one result of the 1968

Democratic National Convention

• Increase the number of people involved in choosing the candidate – greater citizen input.

• Got rid of backroom deals and weakened party bosses

PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES,

CONTINUED

• Primaries, continued

• Primary voters more affluent, educated, and ideological than general election voters.

• Open vs. Closed Primaries

• Caucuses

• More participatory

• Iowa holds the first caucuses

CONVENTIONS

• Conventions

• Held in the summer before the presidential election

• Mostly a reward for loyal party supporters

• Delegates again more educated, affluent, and ideological than the average voter

• McGovern-Fraser Commission

• Increased the number of female and minority delegates to the

Democratic convention

• The Democratic Party later added superdelegates to give part leaders greater control over the nomination process.

ELECTIONS

• Primaries and caucuses are nominating elections – they are the process used to select candidates for the general election

• A general election is the election in which voters select which candidate they actually want to serve in each office.

ELECTIONS

• How the votes are counted – Presidential election

• Electoral College forces presidential candidates to compete in “swing states”

• These are states that are competitive and have relatively large populations

• Winner Take All System helps create swing states

• Electoral College does give more weight to smaller states because of the 3 vote guarantee.

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Elections in the U.S. are First-Past-the-Post/ Single-Member

District contests

• Members of Congress represent a specific geographic area

• Winners do NOT need a majority, only a plurality in order to win

• This marginalizes third parties in American politics

• Candidates only need a plurality to win, not a majority

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE

• An electoral system based on single-member districts is usually characterized by

• (A) strong, centralized political parties and a weak executive

• (B) higher rates of voter turnout than are common in other systems

• (C) legislative representation of each party in proportion to the number of votes it receives

• (D) domination of the legislature by two political parties

• (E) ideological rather than mass-based parties

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Incumbents enjoy a huge advantage in winning elections

• Advantage is greater in the House than the Senate

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Congressional Districts

• Redistricting

• District boundaries are drawn by state legislatures

• Usually done every 10 years after the census

• Gerrymandering is drawing districts to give one party an advantage over the other

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE

• Congressional district boundaries are usually redrawn every ten years by the

• (A) Bureau of the Census

• (B) state legislatures

• (C) President

• (D) House Rules Committee

• (E) Federal Elections Commission

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Congressional Districts, continued

• The SCOTUS has created some basic rules about redistricting

• Districts should be roughly equal in population

• Districts should be “compact and contiguous”

• Race can be a factor but not the primary factor

• Should keep “communities of interest” together

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE

• Which of the following is generally true of gerrymandering of congressional districts?

• (A) It results in more Democrats being elected in the House.

• (B) It results in more Republicans being elected to the House.

• (C) It guarantees that all minority parties will be equally represented.

• (D) It creates districts that favor one political party over another.

• (E) It violates the principle of one-person, one-vote.

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Congressional Districts, continued

• In districts with large numbers of non-English speakers, voting materials must be provided in native languages according to the Voting Rights Act (1965)

ELECTIONS, CONTINUED

• Critical Elections

• Critical Elections result in party realignment

• Realignment is when the basic supporters of a party have changed

• For example, the South used to be controlled by the

Democrats. Today it is solidly Republican

• Proof of long term shifts rather than “nature of the times” shifts.

• Some critical elections include 1932 and 1968

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE

• The concept of “critical elections” is most closely associated with

• (A) the electoral college process

• (B) elections during wartime

• (C) the nomination process

• (D) economic recession

• (E) party realignment

MONEY AND CAMPAIGNING

FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT

(1974)

• Created the Federal Election Commission (FEC)

• In charge of administering campaign finance laws

• Led by a bipartisan commission

• Requires disclosure

• Candidates must file quarterly reports detailing where the money came from and where it went

• Political Action Committees (PACs)

• PACs are a tool to track union and corporate donations

• A PAC can contribute $5000/candidate per cycle

• The number of PACs has grown tremendously over the past 30 years

SAMPLE MULTIPLE CHOICE

• Which of the following is a correct statement about political action committees (PAC’s)?

• (A) The number of PAC’s has remained stable over the past decade.

• (B) Most PAC money is distributed to challengers in an effort to unseat hostile incumbents.

• (C) The amount of money that a PAC can contribute directly to an individual candidate is limited by law

• (D) PAC’s are illegal in most states.

• (E) PAC’s rarely attempt to influence legislation through lobbying activities.

FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT

(1974), CONTINUED

• Created Matching funds for presidential campaigns

• Once a presidential candidate reaches certain thresholds, the federal government will match funds raised by that candidate

• If a candidate took federal money, they agreed to federal limits

• Recent candidates have not accepted federal funding

• Created limits on how much could be given to a candidate – hard money

• Did not address soft money

• Soft money was money donated to parties for GOTV and grassroots campaigns

BUCKLEY V. VALEO (1976)

• SCOTUS ruled that an individual could spend as much of their own money on their political campaign.

• SCOTUS said is was a free speech issue

INDEPENDENT

EXPENDITURES

• Spending independent of campaigns by outside groups, usually known as 527s, is also protected as free speech

• Circumvented the ban on soft money – spent $254 million in

2008

• These are called independent expenditures

THE BIPARTISAN CAMPAIGN REFORM

ACT (M

C

CAIN-FEINGOLD) 2002

• Eliminated soft money – money given to parties is now subject to limits - $32,400

• Was meant to create a more level playing field

• Required more disclosure and transparency

• Raised the limit on hard money to $2000

• Indexed for inflation - $2600 in 2013-2014

THE BIPARTISAN CAMPAIGN REFORM ACT (MCCAIN-

FEINGOLD) 2002, CONTINUED

• Limits on independent expenditures

• Could not identify a candidate for federal office 60 days prior to general election

• Corporation or unions could not use general funds to pay for independent expenditures

• These restrictions were overturned by Citizens United v. FEC

(2010)

Sample FRQ – 2011

• Nominees for the presidency of the two major parties are chosen by delegates at national conventions. How these delegates are chosen varies across states and between the political parties.

• a. Define each of the following methods used by states to choose delegates to party conventions.

• Open primary

• Caucus

• b. Republican Party rules permit winner-take-all primaries. Describe one consequence of this rule for the Republican nomination process.

• c. The Democratic Party has used superdelegates in the presidential nominating process since

1984. Explain why the use of superdelegates increases the influence of party leaders in the

Democratic nomination process.

• d. Explain why a candidate’s strategy to win the nomination is often different from the strategy developed to win the general election.

Sample FRQ – 2011

• 5 points

• Part (a): 2 points

• One point is earned for a correct definition of open primary: a primary election in which any voter can cast a ballot in any party’s primary.

• One point is earned for a correct definition of caucus: a meeting or gathering of members of a political party where members deliberate and choose from the list of those seeking the presidential nomination.

Sample FRQ – 2011

• 5 points

• Part (b): 1 point

• One point is earned for an acceptable consequence for a winner-take-all primary, which can include the following:

• Shortens the timeframe for candidates wrapping up the nomination.

• Affects strategic decisions (e.g., allocation of funds, time).

• Advantages those with more prominence or better name recognition early in the process.

Sample FRQ – 2011

• Part (c): 1 point

• One point is earned for an acceptable explanation of how superdelegates increase the power of party leaders, which can include the following:

• Party leaders are now assured a role in the nomination process, regardless of which candidate they support.

• Party leaders can cast the deciding vote in close nomination contests.

• Superdelegates are unpledged and therefore can change their minds on candidates as the process unfolds.

Sample FRQ – 2011

• Part (d): 1 point

• One point is earned for an acceptable explanation for why campaign strategies often differ between primary and general elections, which can include the following:

• The electorate in the primary election is different from the electorate in the general election.

• A candidate’s opponents in the primary are fellow partisans, whereas opponents in the general election are from other parties.

• There are differences in financing, media coverage and current events leading up to the general election.

Download