UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
Army G-3/5/7
Readiness Reporting Update
AUSA Conference
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
Purpose
Army G-3/5/7
The purpose of this briefing is to provide an
update on the 2009 revision of AR 220-1. Units
will begin reporting on a single METL in the
USR effective 15 December 2009.
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
•
Army G-3/5/7
AR 220-1 is:
–
–
POLICY
•
–
•
Proponent for Standardizing METL. Standardized METL is a CSA/TRADOC initiative.
Proponent for specific deployability criteria or for manning and equipping requirements.
ARFORGEN synchronization mechanism
C-Levels are:
–
READINESS
LEVELS
Authoritative policy for readiness reporting IAW Congressional, OSD, Joint Staff, and Army
readiness reporting requirements.
Unifies Army unique and externally directed readiness and information reporting
requirements into a single report .
AR 220-1 is not:
–
–
–
•
What Readiness Reporting is and is not
Assessments based on the status of resources available and training conducted in the unit
measured against its wartime/designed capabilities.
Army units are designed to possess capabilities across the spectrum of conflict – CRatings represent this.
C-Levels are not:
–
–
–
An assessment of capabilities for only a portion of the spectrum of the conflict.
A comparison of unit capabilities over time (organizational documents, i.e. MTOEs change
on a routine basis).
METL assessments. METL assessment support the training level determination.
Don’t push complex analysis to unit commanders. AR 220-1 sets the reporting
requirements (input) and the DRRS-Army system facilitates analysis (output).
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
THE BIG CHANGE (AR 220-1)
Army G-3/5/7
THE USR IS ONE REPORT
CORE/DESIGNED MISSION
READINESS
C-Level
Commanders
Unit Status Report
(CUSR)
ASSIGNED MISSION
READINESS
One Report contains both
designed and assigned
mission assessments
A-Level
(feeds JS PCTEF data requirement)
How well a unit is resourced and
trained, measured against the core
functions of the unit.
How well a unit is resourced and
trained measured against the
“assigned mission” requirements of
the unit.
Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements
(supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk
Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments)
Army Only Changes in AR 220-1 Revision
Core Functions = MTOE/TDA
Personnel
Equipment on
Hand
Equipment
Serviceability
Training
Single METL
Commanders always report this assessment monthly
FY 09 Revision is the 5th update to Army
readiness reporting since 2001.
Assigned Mission
Manning
Assigned Mission
Equipping
Commanders report this assessment when
assigned a mission IAW Trigger criteria.
A-Level Reporting Trigger. Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met:
1. When mission is assigned or when directed.
2. When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment.
3. Beginning at LAD minus 180 days
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
The METL Reporting Process
Army G-3/5/7
THE SINGLE METL CONCEPT
• One METL
• Standardized FSO METL or Standardized CMETL for selected Operating Force units at BDE level
and above
• “As Designed” METL for remaining units (Operating and Generating Force)
• Additive tasks (possible for “out of design missions” ONLY)
THE SINGLE METL PROCESS
OF?
YES
METL
Standardized
by TRADOC?
NO
NO
The Single METL
YES
Standardized
FSO METL or CMETL
(42 unit types: About 200 units BDE
& Above)
METL
based on MTOE design & aligned
with the METL of the next higher
command)
(5000+ BDEs, BNs & Sep CO/DET)
METL reflecting
Core functions / designed
capabilities
(800+ GF units)
THE
KEY
ISSUE
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S
ARMY:
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE
STRENGTH
OF NATION
THE NATION
THE STRENGTH
OF THE
Proposed Milestones for AR 220-1
(Based on Final Manuscript Including FSO METL )
Agenda
Army
G-3/5/7
Army G-3/5/7
15 AUG 09
USR Policy &
Procedures
1 SEP
15 SEP
Global
Readiness
Conference
Army METL
Review Board
(AMRB)
2 - 3 SEP 09
15 -17 SEP 09
NetUSR
Software
Deliverable
FOUO / Predecisional
15 OCT
1 NOV
OTJAG Legal
Review
Develop FSO METL Reporting Concept
AR 220-1 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
NetUSR
Development
Schedule
1 OCT
Army
Readiness
Council
1 DEC
15 DEC
1 JAN
Review, Authentication and Publication by APD
Final
Manuscript
to Field &
WARNORD
20-22 OCT 09 1 NOV 09
TRADOC
Input
15 NOV
1 NOV 09 – 31 JAN 10
AR 220-1
Implementation
ALARACT
Based on Final
to Field
Manuscript
15 NOV 09
AR 220-1 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
15 DEC 09
Implement
DRRS-ARMY USER TRAINING
1 SEP 09 – 25 NOV 09
(NetUSR Test
& Evaluation)
Distribute
NetUSR
(Full Dress version. 2.3 to
the Field
Rehearsal 1)
T&E
FDR 1
6–7 OCT 09
9–12 NOV 09
24 NOV 09
Units Report
FSO METL Using
NetUSR version. 2.3
15 DEC 09
This is what the implementation of the FY 09 AR 220-1 delivers: FSO
METL, A-Level with AMM & AME, Operational Environment, New S-Page
with Enhanced Accountability Features, New P-Page with the New Medical
Readiness Classifications & New PME Status Reporting Requirements and
New ARFORGEN Force Pools/Force Types & C-5 Reporting Requirements.
UNCLASS/FOUO
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
Army G-3/5/7
QUESTIONS