ADC PRIVATIZATION
ASCA PRESENTATION
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS
CHARLES L. RYAN
DIRECTOR
December 2011
1
1
ADC Privatization
• ADC has approximately 600 contracts that are managed along
with all other Department single requirement purchases.
• ADC uses private contractors for many functions, although it is
prohibited from using private contractors for functions as
identified in Arizona state law (A.R.S. § 41-1609.P):
– Calculating inmate release dates.
– Awarding sentence credits.
– Approving inmate work assignments, inmate work wages,
and sentence credits given to inmates engaging in the work.
– Granting, denying or revoking sentence credits.
– Placing an inmate under less or more restrictive custody.
– Taking any disciplinary actions.
2
ADC Privatization
• The Department uses private contractors to provide a
variety of services, including:
– Privately operated prisons that house state inmates in
Arizona
– Inmate food service
– Inmate telephone service
– Inmate commissary services
– Correctional Officer Training Academy foodservice
– Inmate Career Training Education (vocational training
provided through Arizona Community Colleges).
• Many of these contracts represent contract relationships
with the private sector going back decades.
3
ADC History of Privatization
4
1986 to FY 2011
• 1986: Food Service: ADC began privatizing its food services in 1986
and completed a comprehensive RFP for the privatization of all
institutional food services in 1997, which remains in place to date.
– Food service contracts were $44,348,351 for FY 2011.
• 1992: Prison Security System Maintenance: ADC first contracted for
Prison Security System Maintenance in 1992. The current contract was
effective on May 1, 2009, expiring 2011.
– Prison Security contracts totaled $1,576,954 for FY 2011.
• 1994: Private Prisons: ADC began contracting with private prisons in
1994. As of August 5, 2011, ADC had five (5) private prison contracts
and 6,146 (15 percent) of its 40,168 inmates in private prisons, making
ADC one of the highest consumers of private prison beds in the nation.
– Private prison contracts totaled $112,356,100 for FY 2011.
5
1986 to FY 2011
• 1996: COTA Food Service: ADC Correctional Officer Training
Academy (COTA) Food Service was privatized in 1996. The current
contract was effective on December 13, 2009, for five consecutive
years, expiring December 13, 2014. COTA food service contract totaled
$450,000 for FY 2011.
• 1999: Inmate Telephone Service: ADC Inmate phone service was
privatized in 1999. The current contract awarded in 2007 expires
October 18, 2014. ADC received commissions for the ADC Special
Services Fund of $3,884,803 for FY 2011.
• 2001: Career Training Education: ADC contracts with seven (7)
Arizona Community Colleges to provide Career Training Education
(CTE) programs designed to assist offenders in gaining marketable
employment skills. CTE contracts totaled $2,942,007 for FY 2011.
6
1986 to FY 2011
• 2004: Inmate Commissary Service: ADC’s commissary services
were privatized in 2004. ADC is currently in a new RFP process for
commissary services for a 5-year term. ADC received commissions for
the ADC Inmate Store Proceeds Fund of $3,977,320 for FY 2011.
• 2006: Re-Entry/Transition Services: ADC contracts with five (5)
vendors to provide inmate Re-Entry/Transition Services, including the
Transition Program for Non-Violent Offenders (A.R.S. § 31-281 et.
seq.); the Community Accountability Program (A.R.S. § 41-1609.05);
the Residential Behavioral Modification Program; the Residential
Substance Abuse Treatment; and the 2010 Prisoner Re-entry Initiative.
Transition services contracts totaled $1,550,044 for FY 2011.
• 2007: Polygraph Services: ADC Polygraph Services were first
contracted in 2007. The current contract was effective on March 17,
2009, expiring 2011. Polygraph service contracts totaled $8,750 for FY
2011.
7
Oversight Authority
• To ensure sound operational practices and maintain public
safety, the Department has acted to ensure that contract
oversight is as efficient and cost-effective as possible.
• The Department, through written policy, requires that each
contracted program be assigned a Department Program
Administrator.
– The Program Administrator is responsible for developing and
managing contracted services.
– Contract management is specific to the terms, conditions, and
requirements of each contract, and is conducted in compliance with
all applicable statutes, administrative rules, Department Orders,
and Director’s Instructions.
8
ADC State-Run and
Private Prisons
9
ADC Facilities by Security Level/Mission
DUI = DUI
GP = General
Population
M = Medical
MH = Mental
Health
PS = Protective
Segregation
R = Reception
Physical Security
Levels:
5 = Highest
(maximum)
4 = High (close)
3 = Moderate
(medium)
2 = Low
(minimum)
ADC Owned & Operated Prison
ADC Contracted Private Prison
MTC
GP 3 2
Winslow
GP 4 3 2
Perryville
All 5 4 3 2
Geo
DUI 2
Lewis
PS 4 3 2
Yuma
GP 4 3 2
Phoenix
R, MH 5 4 3 2
MTC
GP 2
Tucson
M, MH 5 4 3 2
Florence/Eyman
GP 5 4 3 2
Geo (2)
GP 3 2
Safford
GP 3 2
Douglas
GP 3 210
10
CACF
GEO
1 Unit
Florence
West
GEO
1 Unit
Phoenix
West
GEO
1 Unit
Kingman
MTC
Complex
Douglas
5 Units
Eyman
5 Units
ADC Prison System Services
To all Prisons (A.R.S.41-1609.01)
Private Prison
Hualapai
Unit
ADC
Administration
Armory
Business/Procurement/Banking
Communications Center
Food Service
Health Services
Inmate Education/Programming
Inmate Work programs
Mail & Property
Occupational Health
Perimeter Security
Records/Release Processing
Sanitation/Maintenance
Tactical Support
Training
Transportation/Fuel
Warehouse/Supply
Visitation Processing
Waste Water/
Infrastructure
Cerbat
Unit
Marana
MTC
1 Unit
Classification (custody level, housing);
Inmate Discipline; Inmate Grievances;
Inmate Releases; Investigations; Prison
Labor Classification; PREA
Investigations; ACJIS/ACIC/NCIC
ADC Central Services
To Private Prisons
Private Prison Contract
Development;
Compliance & Service
Monitoring & Auditing
State and ADC Central Services
Accounting; ACI; Business
Services; Director’s Office; Canine
Oversight; Education Services
Oversight; Engineering Facilities;
Food Services Management;
Health Services Oversight; Human
Resources; Information
Technology; Inmate Programming
Oversight; Inmate Work Oversight;
Inspector General; Offender
Operations Oversight; Payroll;
Planning, Budget, Research;
Procurement; Radio
Communications; Religious
Services Oversight; Risk
Management; Staff Training;
Telecommunications
Yuma
5 Units
Florence
6 Units
ADC Complex
Administration
Armory
Business/Procurement/Banking
Communications Center
Food Service
Health Services
Inmate Education/Programming
Inmate Work Programs
Mail & Property
Occupational Health
Perimeter Security
Records/Release Processing
Sanitation/Maintenance
Tactical Support
Training
Transportation/Fuel
Warehouse/Supply
Visitation Processing
Waste Water/
Infrastructure
Lewis
8 Units
Perryville
8 Units
Phoenix
2 Units
Safford
3 Units
Tucson
9 Units
Winslow
3 Units
11
Prison Operating Capacity
• October 31, 2011 total ADC Prison System Operating Capacity
(Rated Beds plus Temporary Beds): 42,393
– ADC State-Run Prison Operating Capacity: 35,855 (85%)
– Private Prison Operating Capacity: 6,538 (15%)
• The 6,538 current private beds consist of:
– 3,750 minimum custody beds (22% of all minimum custody
prison system beds):
• 1,250 DUI/Substance Abuse/Return To Custody
• 2,500 General Population
– 2,788 medium custody beds (17% of all medium custody
prison system beds):
• 1,280 Sex Offenders
• 1,508 General Population
12
Prison Population Distribution
• On October 31, 2011, the Department had jurisdiction over
a total of 45,925 inmates and offenders:
– 33,659 inmates incarcerated in Department prisons,
including 3,609 females and 96 minors.
– 6,444 inmates incarcerated in contracted private
prisons.
– 5,822 offenders on community supervision (inmates
who have been paroled or statutorily released from
prison before their entire sentence has been served.)
13
ADC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & COMMITTED POPULATION
for the MONTH ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2011
Total
Operating Capacity
Rated Beds +
Temporary Beds =
Operating Capacity
(R+T=OC)
Arizona State Prison
Douglas
Eyman
Florence
Lewis
Perryville (Female)
Phoenix*
Safford
Tucson*
Winslow
Yuma
Total Rated Beds
Total Temporary Beds
MAX Beds
CLOSE Beds
MED Beds
MIN Beds
Rated
Temp.
Rated
Temp.
Rated
Temp.
Rated
Temp.
Operating
Capacity Beds
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(A-H)
0
1,632
1,074
48
228
247
0
36
0
0
3,265
0
312
0
0
72
137
0
0
0
0
0
400
0
1,956
298
125
0
1,073
400
800
5,052
521
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0
803
1,992
1,144
1,600
960
150
250
1,886
400
2,050
11,235
30
124
795
547
478
0
0
81
515
0
0
1,252
0
1,426
1,000
2,716
30
1,203
1,754
826
1,500
11,707
2,540
399
0
248
152
0
25
385
0
216
80
1,505
ASPC Total
Special
Inmate
Inmate
Total
Use
Beds
Population
in Operating
Population
in Special
Inside
Inmate
Beds
Beds
Population
2,578
5,131
4,439
5,234
4,274
714
1,919
5,294
1,842
4,430
31,259
4,596
89
264
96
275
58
9
55
291
51
175
2,382
4,736
4,329
4,752
3,414
592
1,725
4,807
1,508
4,052
65
200
74
197
17
7
29
229
24
139
2,447
4,936
4,403
4,949
3,431
599
1,754
5,036
1,532
4,191
35,855
1,363
32,297
981
33,278
Contracted In-State Private Prisons
Central AZ Correc.
Facility (GEO)
Florence-West (GEO)
Phoenix-West (GEO)
Kingman (MTC)
Marana (MTC)
Total Rated Beds
Total Temporary Beds
0
0
0
1,000
280
0
0
1,280
40
1,267
10
1,277
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
2,400
0
0
108
0
600
400
2,000
450
3,450
150
100
0
50
0
300
750
500
3,508
500
5,850
688
25
20
153
10
666
494
3,331
498
10
5
130
0
676
499
3,461
498
0
In-State Private Total
ALL TOTAL
0
0
388
0
0
0
0
2,400
388
3,450
300
6,538
248
6,256
155
6,411
3,265
521
5,052
30
13,635
2,928
15,157
1,805
42,393
1,611
38,553
1,136
39,689
Out to Court / Out to Medical
414
TOTAL PRISON INMATE POPULATION
40,103
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION OFFENDERS
5,822
ADC TOTAL
45,925
*ASPC-Phoenix has 20 Rated Female Beds/2 Female Special Use Beds; ASPC-Tucson/SACRC has 144 Rated Female Beds/2 Special Use Female Beds
14
Private Prisons
• ASP-Central Arizona Correctional Facility/CACF (GEO):
– Medium Custody/1,280 Beds
– Current Sex Offense/Conviction/Sex Offender Treatment
– Moderate Medical/Mental Health Needs
• ASP-Phoenix West (GEO):
– Minimum Custody/500 Beds
– DUI Offenders/DUI Offender Treatment
– Health Care Cost Limit Per Inmate ($10,000 Cap)
– Moderate Medical/Mental Health Needs
• ASP-Florence West (GEO):
– Minimum Custody/750 Beds
– DUI Offenders/DUI Offender Treatment
– Return to Custody Inmates
– Moderate Medical/Mental Health Needs
15
Private Prisons
• ASP-Kingman Hualapai Unit (MTC):
– Medium Custody/1,508 Beds
– Restricted General Population (Lower Risk Inmates; No Life
Sentences, No Murder, No Escape History, No Sentences over 20
Years)
– Moderate Medical/Mental Health Needs
• ASP-Kingman Cerbat Unit (MTC):
– Minimum Custody/2,000 Beds
– Restricted General Population (Lower Risk Inmates; No murder, No
Escape History)
– Moderate Medical/Mental Health Needs
• ASP-Marana (MTC):
– Minimum Custody/500 Beds
– Lower Risk Drug & DUI Offenders/Substance Abuse Treatment
– Health Care Cost Limit Per Inmate ($10,000 Cap)
– Low Medical/Mental Health Needs
16
PRIVATE PRISONS
CACF
Marana
GEO Group
Male
Medium
Sex Offenders
Operating Capacity: 1,280
MTC
Male
Minimum
Drug/DUI
Operating Capacity: 500
Florence West
GEO Group
Male
Minimum
DUI
Operating Capacity:
750
ADC
Classification
(custody level, housing);
Inmate Discipline;
Prison Labor Classification;
Inmate Grievances;
Criminal Investigations;
PREA Investigations;
Inmate Releases;
ACJIS/ACCIC/NCIC;
Contract Development;
Contract Compliance;
Service Monitoring;
Auditing
MTC
Male
Lower Risk
Minimum/Medium
Operating Capacity:
3,508
Phoenix West
GEO Group
Male
Minimum
DUI
Operating Capacity: 500
FY 2011
Kingman
Hualapai Unit
Male
Medium
Lower Risk
General Population
Operating Capacity:
1,508
Cerbat Unit
Male
Minimum
Lower Risk
General Population
Operating Capacity:
2,000
Kingman is operated under a Complex Model
17
Significant Events
Affecting Privatization
FY 2010 - FY 2012
18
FY 2010
• Privatization: Arizona Laws 2009 mandated major
correctional privatization Initiatives:
– Lease-purchase agreements for the privatization of
state-run ADC prisons (Concession Agreement).
– 5,000 new minimum/medium private prison beds.
– Privatization of all correctional health services provided
in state-run ADC prisons.
• Escape: July 30, 2010 Private Prison Escape at MTC
Prison in Kingman Arizona.
19
Concession Agreement
20
Concession Agreement
• The law originally sought to privatize the operations of
nine (9) ADC state-run prison complexes through a
Concession Agreement. This included prisons housing
Maximum, Close, Medium, and Minimum custody
inmates
• ADC was successful in working with the legislature to
exclude any complex that housed maximum or close
custody beds, finally reducing the number of
complexes that could be considered for privatization to
two (2) rural prisons that housed only Medium and
Minimum custody inmates (ASPC-Douglas and ASPCSafford/Ft. Grant).
21
Concession Agreement
• On February 1, 2010, ADC released a Request for
Information (RFI) to gauge interest from private
companies in these two (2) rural state-run prison
complexes. Based upon the responses to the RFI,
ADC concluded that privatization was not feasible.
• On June 15, 2010, the law was repealed and the
privatization effort was abandoned.
22
5,000 Private Prison
Beds
23
5,000 Private Beds
• The law required ADC to issue a Request for Proposal for 5,000 new
minimum/medium private prison beds.
•
• On February 23, 2010, ADC released the RFP.
• On May 28, 2010, four (4) bidders responded:
– Emerald Management Corporation
– Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)
– Management & Training Corporation (MTC)
– The GEO Group, Inc.
• On September 1, 2010, in response to the ASP-Kingman escape and
given the priority of public safety, ADC cancelled the RFP in order to
revise and strengthen the RFP.
24
Private Prison
RFP & Contract Changes
•
Future requests for proposals (RFPs) and contracts for private prisons, including the
5,000 Private Prison Bed contract, will contain new or expanded provisions:
–
Expanded and better defined RFP evaluation criteria.
–
More comprehensive information regarding a contractor’s past performance and
past occurrences.
–
Annual re-certification of all security systems.
–
Staff mechanisms to report problems.
–
Private prison coverage of costs incurred by federal and other jurisdictions.
–
Enhanced contract performance auditing guidelines, required performance
outcomes and measures, and reporting requirements.
–
Contract monitoring general requirements.
–
Additional monetary offsets and sanctions that can be when exigent
circumstances occur.
25
5,000 Private Beds
• On January 24, 2011, ADC released the revised RFP
 On February 24, 2011, five (5) bidders responded:
 Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)
 Emerald Management Corporation
 The GEO Group, Inc.
 LaSalle Correctional Management
 Management & Training Corporation (MTC)
26
ADC Facilities by Security Level/Mission
DUI = DUI
GP = General
Population
M = Medical
MH = Mental
Health
PS = Protective
Segregation
R = Reception
Physical Security
Levels:
5 = Highest
(maximum)
4 = High (close)
3 = Moderate
(medium)
2 = Low
(minimum)
ADC Owned & Operated Prison
ADC Contracted Private Prison
Proposed Private Prison Site (RFP)
MTC
GP 3 2
Winslow, 2 3
1,000 Beds
Winslow
GP 4 3 2
Perryville, 2 3
2,000 to 5,000 Beds
Geo
DUI 2
Perryville
All 5 4 3 2
Phoenix
R, MH 5 4 3 2
Lewis
PS 4 3 2
MTC
GP 2
Yuma
GP 4 3 2
Yuma, 2 3
2,000 to 3,000 Beds
Eloy, 2 3
1,500 to 4,500 Beds
Tucson
M, MH 5 4 3 2
Coolidge, 2 3
3,000 to 5,000 Beds
Florence/Eyman
GP 5 4 3 2
Geo (2)
GP 3 2
Safford
GP 3 2
Douglas
GP 3 2 27
27
5,000 Private Beds
 ADC evaluated the proposals between March – August 2011. As a
result of the evaluation, ADC identified various bed combinations,
selected the proposals for site hearings, and made notifications as
required by A.R.S. § 41-1609.02.
 Five (5) Site Hearings were held between August 9 and August 18,
2011:
 CCA: Eloy, Arizona
 GEO: ASPC-Perryville, Goodyear, Arizona
 LaSalle: Winslow, Arizona
 GEO and MTC: ASPC-Yuma, Yuma, Arizona
 MTC: Coolidge, Arizona
 ADC is currently completing the evaluation process necessary to
make a final site(s) determination(s) for the private incarceration
facility(ies).
28
A.R.S § 41-1609.01
 ADC is in the process of conducting the first Arizona
comprehensive biennial comparison of “private versus
public provision of services,” required by Arizona state law.
• A.R.S. § 41-1609.01(K) requires that for executed private
prison contracts, the Department Director conduct a
biennial comparison of the private contractor’s provision of
services to the state’s provision of services for a similar
facility. The purpose of the comparison is to determine if
the contractor is providing the same quality of services as
the state at a lower cost or services superior in quality to
those provided by the state at essentially the same cost.
29
A.R.S § 41-1609.01
•
A.R.S. § 41-1609.01(K) identifies ten (10) service areas that the
Department Director shall consider when conducting the biennial
comparison. They include nine (9) required service areas and allow
for additional discretionary services areas as determined by the
Department Director:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Security
Inmate Management and Control
Inmate Programs and Services
Facility Safety and Sanitation
Administration
Food Service
Personnel Practices and Training
Inmate Health Services
Inmate Discipline
Other matters relating to services as determined by the Department
Director
30
A.R.S § 41-1609.01
• Pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1609.01(M), the service
comparison is limited to contractors who exclusively
contract with the Department. In addition, the Department
is required to submit to the Joint Legislative Budget
Committee (JLBC) for its review each completed service
comparison.
 The first comparison report will be completed on or before
January 2012.
31
Privatization of Inmate
Health Services
32
Health Services Privatization

On February 19, 2010, ADC issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to privatize
all correctional health services, in all state owned and operated ADC facilities,
at a cost below the FY 2008 costs for these services.

On May 24, 2010, six (6) susceptible proposals submitted.

On June 2010, the ADC FY 2010 actual health care cost of $122,171,259 was
$15.2 million less than the FY 2008 actual health care cost of $137,375,452.

On December 14, 2010, ADC presented its findings to the Arizona Joint
legislative Budget Committee in Executive Session.

On March 25, 2011, prior to award, ADC cancelled the RFP in anticipation of
new legislation related to privatization of Correctional Health Services.

On April 27, 2011, a new law was passed that required a new Correctional
Health Services Request for Information (RFI) and Request for Proposal (RFP)
process and removed the original requirement requiring ADC to award a
Contract at a cost below the ADC FY 2007-2008 total cost.
33
Health Services Privatization
 On May 27, 2011, the new RFI was released.
 On June 27, 2011, responses were received from ten (10)
vendors.
 On July 22, 2011, an ADC evaluation team met and evaluated
the responses to the RFI.
 On July 28, 2011, in JLBC Executive Session, ADC presented
the RFI responses. JLBC gave the matter a favorable review,
allowing ADC to proceed with the RFP.
 On October 25, 2011, ADC issued the RFP with responses due
December 21, 2011.
 ADC intends the new Contract to be fully operational and all
services fully transitioned by June 30, 2012.
34
ASP-Kingman Escape
And
ADC Response
35
36
ASP-Kingman Escape
July 30, 2010
•
2045 – 2115 hours (8:45-9:15 PM): Inmates McCluskey, Province, and Renwick,
with the help of accomplice Welch, escaped; exiting the perimeter of the prison
complex on the East side and walking to the North and East of the prison.
•
2230 hours (10:30 PM): MTC notified Mohave County Sheriff’s Office. This and
all subsequent notifications were later than appropriate.
•
2337 hours (11:37 PM): ADC was officially notified of the escape 2 hours after
MTC positively identified the inmates had escaped. ADC initiated immediate
response action and notified Arizona Governor.
•
2337-2350 hours (11:37-11:50 PM): ADC dispatched K9 teams, activated ADC
Central Office Emergency Operations Center, and assumed Incident Command.
•
0254 hours (2:54 AM): ADC sent out media advisory of the escape.
•
0800 hours (8:00 AM): ADC staff arrived on scene in Kingman and took over as
on-scene commander. Kingman was directed to immediately enhance perimeter
patrols.
•
1400 hours (2:00 PM): ADC accepted offer from US Marshal’s Service to assist in
the man hunt.
37
ASP-Kingman Escapees Captured
August 2010
• August 1, 2010: Inmate Renwick was captured in Rifle,
Colorado.
• August 8, 2010: Inmate Province was captured in
Wyoming, near Yellowstone National Park.
• August 19, 2010: Inmate McCluskey and accomplice
Welch were captured at a campground near Sunrise Ski
Resort, in Arizona, by a tactical-response team of
Apache County, Arizona sheriff's deputies, with the help
of the Arizona Department of Public Safety and United
States Forest Service.
38
ADC Response and Action
•
July 30, 2010: Movement ceased by ADC Director Ryan. ASPKingman population the day after the escapes (July 31, 2010) was
3,390.
•
August 2010 – February 2011:
– ADC conducted a series of targeted Kingman on-site inspections,
assessments, and audits. Over 170 serious deficiencies were identified,
which required corrective action.
– ADC also initiated the most aggressive and comprehensive security
reform measures in the history of the Department, conducting state-wide
reviews of both private and state-run prisons using a new comprehensive
inspection program (GAR/Audit).
•
September 21, 2010: ADC imposed new inmate restrictions,
prohibiting inmates with current or prior convictions for murder,
inmates serving life sentences, and inmates with a history of escape,
and transferred 238 inmates from ASP-Kingman to other medium
custody and minimum custody state prisons.
•
March 14-17, 2011: MTC was deemed to have substantially cured all
deficiencies. Loading of inmates resumed.
39
Work Ahead
40
Work Ahead
•
ADC is committed to improving performance and efficiency through
responsible and viable initiatives that reduce costs, cut bureaucracy, eliminate
duplication, and improve customer service.
•
ADC believes this includes the fiscally responsible use of private partners and
continues to explore additional privatization, including:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Statewide ADC Radio Communication System: Privatization of ADC radio
services.
Structured Release Programs: Use of day reporting services and/or residential
work centers (half-way houses) for released offenders.
Inmate Banking System: Privatization of all or part of the Inmate Trust Account
System, bank reconciliation, which accounts for and distributes monies collected
from inmates for state and federal filing fees and court ordered restitution.
Employee Background Investigations: Contracting with a service to conduct
employee screenings and background checks.
Storage of Criminal Investigation Evidence: Contracting with an evidence
depository to maintain chain of possession of evidentiary materials.
Medical Records Management/Imaging Medical Records: Contracting some of
the current medical records functions performed by ADC staff.
Occupational Health Services: Partial privatization of occupational health
services, specifically TB testing and Hepatitis B immunizations.
Collection of Inmate Fees: Contracting for the collection of fees owed by or
accrued by released offenders.
41
Questions?
1601 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
602-542-5225
http://www.azcorrections.gov
42