Kinetics versus kinematics for analyzing coordination during

advertisement

Biomechanics of Walking

D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB

Biomechanics, Laboratory,

School of Human Kinetics,

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Quantitative Domains

Temporal

– Phases (stance/swing) and events

(foot-strike, toe-off), stride rate

Kinematic (motion description)

– stride length, velocity, ranges of motion, acceleration

Kinetic (causes of motion)

– ground reaction forces, joint forces, moments of force, work, energy and power

Temporal Analysis

Stride time

Stride rate = 1/rate

Stride cadence = 120 x rate (b/min)

Instrumentation

– Photocells and timers

– Videography (1 frame =

1/30 second)

– Metronome

EMG

Motion Analysis Tools

Cine or

Video camera

Force platform

Bortec system

Electromyography

Noraxon system

Delsys electrodes Mega system

Kinematic Analysis

Study of motion without consideration of its causes

Motion description

Based on Calculus developed by Newton and Leibnitz

Isaac Newton, 1642-1727

Kinematic Analysis

Manual goniometer

• Linear position

– Ruler, tape measure, optical

Angular position

– Protractor, inclinometer, goniometer

Linear acceleration

– Accelerometry, videography

Angular acceleration

– Videography

Miniature accelerometers

Motion Analysis

High-speed cine-camera

Cinefilm, video or infrared video

Subject is filmed and locations of joint centres are digitized

Videocamera

Infra-red camera

Computerized Digitizing

(APAS)

Stick Figure Animation

Kinetic Analysis

Causes of motion

Forces and moments of force

• Work, energy and power

Impulse and momentum

• Inverse Dynamics derives forces and moments from kinematics and body segment parameters (mass, centre of gravity, and moment of inertia)

Force Platforms

Kistler force platforms

Steps for Inverse Dynamics

Space diagram of the lower extremity

Divide Body into Segments and

Make Free-Body Diagrams

Make free-body diagrams of each segment

Add all Known Forces to FBD

Weight (W)

Ground reaction force (F g

)

Apply Newton’s Laws of

Motion to Terminal Segment

Start analysis with terminal segment(s), e.g., foot or hand

Apply Reactions of Terminal

Segment to Distal End of Next

Segment in Kinematic Chain

Continue to next link in the kinematic chain, e.g., leg or forearm

Repeat with Next segment in

Chain or Begin with Another Limb

Repeat until all segments have been considered, e.g., thigh or arm

Normal Walking Example

Female subject

Laboratory walkway

Speed was 1.77 m/s (fast)

IFS = ipsilateral foot-strike

ITO = ipsilateral toe-off

CFS = contralateral foot-strike

CTO = contralateral toe-off

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power

• Dorsiflexors produce dorsiflexion during swing

• Plantiflexors control dorsiflexion

• Large burst of power by plantiflexors for push-off

10

Dorsiflexion

0

-10

Plantar flexion

100

Dorsiflexors

0

-100

Plantar flexors

Trial: 2SFN3

Ang. velocity

Moment

Power

100

Concentric

0

-100

Eccentric

-200

CFS ITO

0.0

0.2

IFS CTO

0.4

0.6

Time (s)

0.8

CFS ITO

1.0

1.2

Knee angular velocity, moment of force and power

• Negative work by flexors to control extension prior to foot-strike

• Burst of power to cushion landing

Negative work by extensors to control flexion at push-off

10

Extension

0

-10

Flexion

100

Extensors

0

-100

Flexors

Trial: 2SFN3

Ang. velocity

Moment

Power

100

Concentric

0

-100

Eccentric

-200

CFS ITO

0.0

0.2

IFS CTO

0.4

0.6

Time (s)

0.8

CFS ITO

1.0

1.2

Hip angular velocity, moment of force and power

• Positive work by flexors to swing leg

• Positive work by extensors to extend thigh

• Negative work by flexors to control extension

10

Flexion

0

-10

Extension

100

Flexors

0

-100

Extensors

100

Concentric

Trial: 2SFN3

Ang. velocity

Moment

Power

0

-100

Eccentric

-200

CFS ITO

0.0

0.2

IFS CTO

0.4

0.6

Time (s)

0.8

CFS ITO

1.0

1.2

Solid-Ankle, Cushioned Heel

(SACH) Prostheses

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of SACH foot prosthesis

• Power dissipation during weight acceptance and push-off

• No power produced during push-off

10.

Dorsiflexing

0.

-10.

100.

Plantar flexing

Dorsiflexor

0.

-100.

100.

Plantar flexor

Concentric

Trial: WB24MH-S

Ang. velocity

Net moment

Power

0.

-100.

Eccentric

-200.

ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Time (s)

FlexFoot Prostheses

(Energy Storing)

Original model

Recent models

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of FlexFoot prosthesis

• Power returned during push-off

10.

Dorsiflexing

0.

-10.

100.

Plantar flexing

Dorsiflexor

Trial: WB13MH-F

Ang. velocity

Net moment

Power

0.

-100.

250.

Plantar flexor

Concentric

0.

-250.

Eccentric

-500.

0.0

ITO

0.2

IFS CTO

0.4

0.6

Time (s)

0.8

CFSITO

1.0

1.2

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of person with hemiplegia

(normal side)

• Power at push-off is increased to compensate for other side

10.

Dorsiflexing

0.

-10.

100.

Plantar flexing

Dorsiflexor

0.

Trial: WPN03EG

Ang. vel.

Net moment

Power

-100.

100.

Plantar flexor

Concentric

0.

-100.

-200.

0.0

Eccentric

IFS CTO

0.2

CFS ITO

0.4

Time (s)

0.6

IFS

0.8

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of person with hemiplegia

(stroke side)

• Reduced power during push-off due to muscle weakness

• Increased amount of negative work during stance

10.

Dorsiflexing

0.

-10.

Plantar flexing

100.

Dorsiflexor

Trial: WPP14EG

Ang. vel.

Net moment

Power

0.

-100.

Plantar flexor

100.

Concentric

0.

-100.

Eccentric

-200.

IFS CTO

0.0

0.2

CFS ITO

0.4

Time (s)

0.6

IFS

0.8

Answers?

Questions?

Comments?

Download